Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 306 views

    Motion To Revive

    Uploaded by

    AJA
    The motion requests that the court revive a case of estafa against Rosita Ranada that was previously dismissed due to a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and defendant. However, the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the agreement. As the motion was filed within the two year period allowed, the prosecution asks the court to revive the case and set a hearing date to allow for its speedy disposition.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Motion To Revive

    Uploaded by

    AJA
    306 views2 pages
    The motion requests that the court revive a case of estafa against Rosita Ranada that was previously dismissed due to a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and defendant. However, the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the agreement. As the motion was filed within the two year period allowed, the prosecution asks the court to revive the case and set a hearing date to allow for its speedy disposition.

    Original Title

    Motion to revive.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The motion requests that the court revive a case of estafa against Rosita Ranada that was previously dismissed due to a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and defendant. However, the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the agreement. As the motion was filed within the two year period allowed, the prosecution asks the court to revive the case and set a hearing date to allow for its speedy disposition.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    306 views2 pages

    Motion To Revive

    Uploaded by

    AJA
    The motion requests that the court revive a case of estafa against Rosita Ranada that was previously dismissed due to a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and defendant. However, the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the agreement. As the motion was filed within the two year period allowed, the prosecution asks the court to revive the case and set a hearing date to allow for its speedy disposition.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    FIRST JUDICIAL REGION


    REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
    BRANCH 28
    San Fernando City, La Union

    PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,


    Plaintif,
    CRIM. CASE NO. 9647
    FOR: ESTAFA
    - versus -

    ROSITA RANADA,
    Accused.
    x - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

    MOTION TO DE-ARCHIVE AND REVIVE

    The undersigned Trial Prosecutor unto this Honorable


    Court, respectfully avers THAT:

    1. On January 9, 2013, a Compromise Agreement was


    executed between the plaintiff and the accused
    which was duly approved by the Honorable Court
    on January 16, 2013;

    2. Consequently, the instant case was provisionally


    dismissed on the same date;

    3. However, the accused never complied with the


    terms of the agreement despite mutually and
    voluntarily concurring to the same;

    4. The order of dismissal was received by the Office of


    the City Prosecutor, San Fernando City, La Union
    on February 26, 2013 while the private
    complainant received his copy on March 8, 2013,
    thus, the filing of this motion to revive the instant
    case is still within the two-year period provided
    under Section 8, Rule 117 of the Revised Rule on
    Criminal Procedure;

    5. In view of which, the plaintiff moves that the


    instant case be revived and set the same for
    hearing for its speedy disposition.

    PRAYER
    WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, it is most
    respectfully prayed of this Honorable Court to issue an
    Order reviving the case and setting the same for
    hearing on February 19, 2015 at 8:30 o’clock in the
    morning.

    Other relief and/or remedies, just and equitable


    are likewise prayed for.

    San Fernando City, La Union, January 28, 2015.

    RODERICK R. AQUINO
    Trial Prosecutor
    Office of the City Prosecutor
    San Fernando City, La Union

    NOTICE

    The Clerk of Court


    RTC-Branch 28
    San Fernando City, La Union

    Please submit the foregoing motion for the


    consideration and approval of the Honorable Court and
    set the same for hearing upon receipt hereof.

    Thank you.

    RODERICK R. AQUINO

    Copy Furnished (by registered mail)

    Rosita Ranada
    Payucpoc Sur,
    Bauang, La Union

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy