Ted Lesley - Psuedo-Psychometry
Ted Lesley - Psuedo-Psychometry
Ted Lesley - Psuedo-Psychometry
Search products…
Columnist:
Ted Lesley
The effect, as I’m sure you know, is that several spectators receive an envelope (or
some other type of container) from the mentalist. They are asked to put a personal
object into it. The envelopes are mixed by another spectator and returned to the per‐
former. As he removes the objects from the envelopes one by one, the performer
senses the personal vibrations of the owner and returns the objects to the correct
person.
The secret is simple and functional: The envelopes are secretly marked and are dis‐
tributed in a known order. Thus, their markings automatically identify the owners of
their contents.
This effect has become a classic, but as far as I’m concerned its no longer suitable
for today’s audiences. Let me explain. If Pseudo-psychometry is presented as a gen‐
uine feat of psychometry, in which you give each lender of an object a cold reading,
the effect becomes too long-winded for modern audiences seeking entertainment
(which mine are). And if the presentation is stripped down to a simple test of what
belongs to whom, it becomes a mere puzzle with a solution that is not terribly difficult
to guess.
There is another flaw, as I see it, in the idea of using Pseudo- psychometry as a plat‐
form for cold readings: In the context of theater corporate and banquet shows it is
seldom believable. In these venues you do not receive many family heirlooms and
long-held personal items. Instead you get lipsticks, combs, mascaras, purse mirrors,
pills, lighters, coins and other incidental items. (I have even received condoms and
tampons, and if you perform Pseudo-psychometry for long, you will too. Be prepared
to deal with them.) Few thinking persons will actually believe that such transitory
items can carry meaningful psychometric vibrations that could provide you with deep
insights into the lender’s history and personality. Of course, if a truly interesting item
comes my way, I will certainly capitalize on it – but most of the time the objects are
going to be trivial.
Over the years I have developed a presentation based on one by Tony Griffith,(1)
which discards cold reading while it dresses up – and therefore conceals – the identi‐
fication of the owners of the lent objects. I have five objects collected. More would
make the routine repetitious. For the first test I take one of the objects and pass it
before each of the five lenders, watching their expressions. From “tiny subconscious
responses” I determine the owner of the object. For the second test, I have each of
the four remaining subjects say the name of the object. Subtle inflections in their
voices tell me the owner of this item. For the third test, I have each of the remaining
lenders say “No” after which I detect the individual who has lied. This brings me to
the last two items. To avoid the pitfall of having the last item become anti-climactic, I
take the remaining objects, one in each hand, and ask their owners to look at them.
Then, from their gazes I am able to divine which object belongs to whom.
This series of varied presentation premises keep things interesting and entertaining–
as long as the pace is brisk and a bit of humor is applied. While I feel that this flurry
of presentation ploys misdirects strongly from the simple method behind it all, over
the years I have sought for better ways to conceal the identification method, making
it impossible for even a critical audience to discover the secret. Spectators know
more about magic and are much shrewder than they once were. Many intelligent
people who take the time after the performance to think about the Pseudo-psychom‐
etry effect can arrive at the correct solution – and that’s a pity. Here I offer two easy,
yet very deceptive methods that have worked extremely well for me.
TECHNICOLOR GRAPHOLOGY
EFFECT
The performer holds a small basket (like a simple bread-basket), which contains at
least fifty correspondence cards and envelopes. These are not neatly arranged, but
lie scattered in the basket. Five felt-tip pens are attached by their clips to the outer
rim of the basket.
Five spectators, preferably women, are each asked to remove from the basket a
card, a pen and an envelope. (The envelopes are of the self-sealing type, for consid‐
erations of hygiene and convenience.) The performer humorously compares the
selections to a lottery, emphasizing that the spectators can remove any card, any
envelope and any pen they wish; and he holds the basket in a way that makes it
easy for them to do so.
Each of the five spectators is asked to write a few words on her card, then insert the
card into the envelope and seal it. Another spectator is recruited to collect the
envelopes and bring them to the performer on stage. Once there he is asked to mix
them.
The performer now opens one envelope after another, studies the different handwrit‐
ings and, through his graphological knowledge, dramatically reveals various charac‐
teristics about each of the five persons, eventually identifying each individual from
her handwriting!
This handling would seem to leave no possibility for identification through secret
marks on the cards or envelopes, and has been designed to deceive well-posted
magicians as well as the public. The method is uncomplicated and utterly simple:
Neither the cards nor the envelopes are prepared – but the pens are.
They look identical but each has a different color of ink! Certain brands of felt-tip
pens can be found whose caps and cartridge tips alone indicate the color of ink they
contain. The bodies of the pens are identical. With a black permanent marker, color
the caps and cartridge tips to match. There is now only one way to tell the pens
apart: by writing with them. Fasten these prepared pens around the mouth of the
basket in a known order, such as red, green, blue, purple and black.
As you will quickly understand, this method is suitable only for a large group, as the
spectators you use must be widely separated. This prevents the secret of the differ‐
ent colored inks from being accidentally discovered. Of course the spectators can
select any pen, since you know the order of the pens and can mentally link the colors
with the spectators. Such memory word is not difficult, but if it seems so, you can
hold the pens in a known order against the side of the basket, and hand them to the
spectators in that order. That may seem a bit bold, but I assure you, no one will think
a thing about it.
Of course the cards must not be returned to the spectators afterward. Instead, casu‐
ally pocket them after you have done each psychometric reading.
Variant presentations are possible using this method. For instance, one can use
Gene Gloye’s Doodles theme,(3) having the spectators draw simple pictures or scrib‐
bles on the cards, which you then relate to the proper spectator. You cannot, of
course, display the doodles as you analyze them, for reasons of both size and
secret. However, you can duplicate them on a large sketch pad as you talk about
them.
CIMMERIAN PSYCHOMETRY
In this version we return to the principle of marked envelopes – but even the best-
informed onlooker will swear that marks could not account for what they have seen.
The result is a method that will convince any audience that you are truly gifted.
EFFECT
Each of five spectators seated in the audience freely takes a normal, self-sealing,
padded mailer from the ten to fifteen offered by the performer. They are then asked
to insert some personal object into their mailer and seal it. The mailers are mixed by
yet another spectator and brought on stage. This spectator proceeds to blindfold the
performer thoroughly, after which the volunteer opens the mailers and puts their con‐
tents on a tray. The performer does not touch the objects. Nevertheless, as he pass‐
es his fingertips over each item, sensing the vibrations it emits, he describes the
object and its owner!
PERFORMANCE
As has been remarked by several psychometry presentations offen suffers from one
weakness: When you reach the last object, the identification of the final spectator is
too obvious, creating an anticlimax when you wish to intensify the effect. He problem
in this context:
After you have been blindfolded, pick up the first of the mixed mailers and hand it to
your helper. It is at this instant that you feel the mark and identify the spectator to
whom the sealed object belongs. Have your helper open the mailer and place its
contents on a tray. You should try to be some distance from him at this time, yet dose
enough to recognize the object and remember as many details about it as possible.
You must manage this in an instant. (One reason I use the Osterlind blindfold is that
it enables you to glimpse the object with a sidewise glance, without turning your
head.) Immediately upon recognizing the object, turn your back to your helper. Next
extend one hand behind you and hold it over the object, pretending to sense its
vibrational pattem. Then proceed to describe the item and its owner. When you have
gone as far as you can with your reading, have your helper return the object to its
lender.
Hand your helper the next mailer and have him open it and place its contents on the
tray. As this is done, secretly read the mark on the mailer and glimpse the object.
Pretend to strain for some sense of the item, but after an apparent effort admit that
the aura of the object is too strong and confused for you to get anything meaningful
from it. Ask your helper to replace the item in its mailer, seal it shut and put it aside
for the moment.
Continue with the remaining three items, having the spectator place each on the tray
for you to read it, then returning it to its owner. One mailer remains: that with which
you experienced difficulty. Ask your helper to take this last mailer (which is still
closed) to its owner in the audience, then to take his seat again with your thanks.
You, now alone on stage, ask the person to concentrate on his object without taking
it from the mailer – and you proceed to describe the person and the object correctly.
Removing your blindfold, request that the spectator take the object from the mailer
and hold it high in the air, so that everyone can see that you have successfully
solved this difficult final challenge!
So much has occurred between the time the second object was placed on the tray
and the time you correctly identify it, the audience will most often forget that it was
ever out of the mailer, or that the mailer was in your hands.
If you practice this experiment well and present it correctly, I promise you that it can
be one of the strongest effects in your program.
(3) Published in Linking Ring, Vol. 36, No. 11, Jan. 1957, p. 76.
Follow Us
Related Posts:
PRODUCT CATEGORIES #
Accessories
Announcements
Antiques/Estate
Audio/Video
Back in Stock
Books
Clearance
Downloadable Products
Effects
Exclusives
Featured Items
FREE
Gambling
Gift Certificates
Halloween Products
Hypnotism
Mentalism Magic
On Sale
Pending Products
Pre-Sale
QR Code
Special-Pricing
Street Magic
Uncategorized
What's Hot
What's New
Article Search
Search
Follow Us
Interesting Products
Shawn Farquhar - Magic Masters Summit - DVD - FREE with Min. Purchase $55.00
$30.00 $0.00
$ 1-316-683-9582 % 1-316-686-2442
Contact Us
Tel: 1-316-683-9582
Fax: 1-316-686-2442
Contact SME
Joe’s Flash
Best Sellers
On Sale Now