TMT Bars
TMT Bars
TMT Bars
2009-2010
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Emergence of steel (Dayarathnam P, 2004)
Concrete has been most extensively used in buildings ever since Joseph Aspdin invented and
patented Portland cement, about one hundred sixty years ago. At its face value, concrete is a
simple material close to the natural one. However, it is lot more complex and can be source of
strength or weakness to the user depending on how well the quality assurance is built into it. It is
robust and reasonably durable one, with compressive strength going up to 150 N/mm 2 under
controlled conditions in suitable combinations of the components. However, its tensile strength is
far below the compressive capacity, so reinforcement is required to resist tensile forces.
Laboratory practices have not been able to device a direct method of evaluating the tensile
capacity, even though indirect tests are available to extrapolate the tensile strength. Many
structures are subjected to bending or combined bending compressive forces. Members such as
ties, pipes and tanks that are subjected to direct tensile forces require reinforcement. Steel bars or
wires are embedded in concrete in the tensile zone, thus reinforcing the tension capacity of the
concrete. The reinforcement is not only used to resist tensile forces but also to resist even
compressive force as in the case of struts, columns etc. Steel is equally good in resisting tension
and compression and its strength is measured by yield or proof strength in uniaxial tension test.
Steel being ductile, it also helps in making the brittle concrete a ductile material to a limited
extent depending on detailing of the reinforcement. The mild steel has a percentage elongation of
the order of 24 percent with yield strength of 250 N/mm 2. The deformed reinforcement bars
either cold twisted or hot rolled do not have a clear yield point like the one in mild steel,
therefore the strength of such high yield steel is specified by proof strength. The proof strength is
the stress that is measured at a preassigned permanent set, normally taken in the range of 0.2
percent. (Most commonly used high yield strength deformed bars have proof strengths of 415
N/mm2 and 500 N/mm2.)
Steel bars of proof strength 550 N/mm2 are also available in the market and used is limited
extent. Even though steel of strength more than 550 N/mm 2 can be produced at reasonable cost,
but not used as reinforcement because of the strain limitations of the concrete. The ultimate
tensile strain in plain concrete is of the order of .00015 and crushing strain is of the order of .
0035.Where as the tensile strain in commonly used high yield strength steel is of the order of
fifteen percent, corresponding to a strain of 0.15. Even though the high strength steel is ductile,
its ductility and strength can not be totally imparted to the brittle concrete without causing
apparent or real damage to the concrete structure as a whole. To avail the advantage of the high
strength of the steel, higher strains in concrete create wide cracks in tension zone and also lead to
crushing under compression. To make the reinforced concrete behave as reasonable
homogeneous material, the embedded reinforcement must be integrated to act along with the
concrete both in compression and tension. Therefore, the bond between the two materials is
equally important to ensure the achievement of the designed strength. That is how the plain bars
in construction were replaced by the deformed bars during sixties. The high strength or even
medium grade concrete must have the high yield deformed bars to ensure integrated action and
eliminate slip between the concrete and steel. The word deformed bar is a misnomer, because
there is really no deformity in the reinforcement in the real sense. The deformation introduced in
the production of the bars aids to enhance the bonding between the two materials and provides an
integrated reinforced concrete.
There are other important points one must pay attention to, regarding reinforcement besides its
strength and bond. The durability of a structure depends on the quality of steel, surface treatment,
and the exposure conditions. Even though concrete provides an alkaline environmental
protection, but in an aggressive exposure condition, the steel reinforcement must be protected
with proper surface treatment of the bars. The level of protection to the reinforcement depends
on the aggressiveness of the exposure. Surface treatment and galvanizing the bars are commonly
used methods besides using the stainless steel reinforcement bars in the most aggressive
exposure condition.
Detailing of reinforcement is another important parameter in establishing the strength and
durability of a structure. The location of the laps and splices, and curtailment of the bars are
important not only from the point of strength but also from durability and constructability angles.
In framed building construction, the beam-column joints are critical, and bar bender has
tendency to provide bar laps and splices at such locations, the percentage of reinforcement is
high and is on both the faces of the members. Providing laps at joints congests the reinforcement
thus resulting in voids or even honeycombing.
Reinforcement is necessary in all reinforced construction not only for strength, but also to
minimize the micro-cracking due to secondary effects such as shrinkage, creep, moisture and
thermal variations. The minor discontinuity in concrete at the reinforcement bar level has a
tendency to change the stress distribution pattern from the assumed simple beam, column and
plate theories. The size of the crack in concrete, either due to bending or tension or due to
secondary effects depends on the diameter of the bar and its location with reference to the
surface of the member. Smaller diameter bars spaced at closure workable spacing are preferred
to large diameters. However, one has to balance between the bar size and volume of the
reinforcement. Just because the reinforcement strengthens the concrete, one should not under the
impression that more reinforcement means more strength. There is always a maximum workable
volume of reinforcement for optimal construction, performance and even for cost. For durability
and good performance, design and construction must take precautions of protection and detailing
of reinforcement bars, in addition to the design considerations.
Concrete structures subjected to dynamic loads such as wind, cyclonic weather and earthquake
undergo repeated reversal stresses. Such loads cause micro cracking and increase the brittleness
of the concrete. Reinforcement is required for protection against cracking of concrete and also to
provide ductility to the structure. Lack of proper reinforcement detailing and enforcement of
quality assurance in buildings have lead to disasters in the recent earthquakes. Therefore the
design and detailing of the reinforcement must be looked into a holistic manner rather than
following simple strength consideration.
techniques, steel reinforcements or the so called rebars play a very important role, comparable to
the bones in the human body.
Pain concrete has very poor tensile and bending strength. Steel reinforcements in RC and PSC
make up this deficiency.
In spite of this, reinforced concrete, though not suitable, is used for beams, which are normally
subjected to tensile stresses. Often cold twisted deformed (CTD) bars are used as reinforcement,
which are prone to accelerated corrosion. With a view to improve durability and cost
effectiveness, steel-intensive structures are increasingly being built using load bearing beams of
steel with RC slab/floor for buildings or PSC deck for bridges/flyovers by adopting technology
of steel-concrete composite construction.
2.2 STEEL BARS/ RODS FOR REINFORCEMENT
Concrete has high compressive strength but low tensile strength. Therefore, steel reinforcement
used in these zones of a concrete structure that develop tensile stresses due to bending, shear or
even compressive loads as in beams, slabs and long columns. However reinforcement action is
efficient only to the extent of bond strength between the reinforcing steel bars and the
surrounding concrete as well as the end hook anchorages. Because of difference in modules
elasticity of steel and concrete, the latter develops tensile cracks. Major cracks can be avoided by
using ductile mild steel and by improving the local bond all along the bar. The bond is improved
by ensuring a non smooth surface, that is, by providing ribs of certain profile and depth on the
surface of the bars and by using deformed bars with ribs and ridges. Further, well distributed
steel reinforcements help in reducing temperature and shrinkage effects in the concrete.
2.3 TYPES OF REINFORCING BARS (Vishwanatha C.S, 2004)
Fig.2.1 Fig.2.2
a. Plain mild steel bars (Fig.2.1): Have yield strength of 250 N/mm 2 and it is used as
reinforcement for the concrete construction industry up to 1965.
b. Square Twisted bars (Fig.2.2): They were brought into market by IRC steels. As these bars
were not efficient enough, they were phased out from the Indian market in very short -period.
Fig.2.3 Fig.2.4
c. Cold twisted bars (Fig.2.3): In 1967, Tor Isteg Steel Corporation of Luxumberg introduced in
India, Cold twisted deformed circular bars of proof stress 420 N/mm 2, which is subsequently
became popular as Tor 40 rebars.
d. Hot rolled bars (Fig.2.4): In this strength of about 420 N/mm 2 from 250 N/mm2 is achieved
by incorporating alloys like nickel and vanadium in the molten metal, while producing the
billets. The billets are subsequently passed through stands resulting in high strength
deformed hot rolled rebars.
Fig.2.5 Fig.2.6
e. Torkari rebars (Fig.2.5): In contrast to the cold twisting, a new procedure for manufacturing
high strength deformed rebars was developed by Germans, branded as Torkari rebars. It is
possible for production of rebars of proof strength up to 550 N/mm 2. The manufacturing
procedure essentially comprises of simultaneous cold reduction of and cold ribbing of wire
rods. This process restricts diameters up to 11 mm.
f. Special reinforcing bars (Fig.2.6): For durability consideration, there is a corrosion resistant
rebars (CRS) from Tata steel.
g. Coated reinforcing bars: The two main categories of factory produced rebars in the Indian
market are, galvanized and epoxy coated rebars. Ex:The galvanized rebars were used in
Bahai’s temple at New Delhi. Epoxy coated rebars are used in bridge structures in coastal
belt around the country.
Fig.2.7
h. Thermo processed (TMT) rebars (Fig.2.7): Between 1980 and 1985, new type of rebars
termed TMT, a Thermo Mechanically Treated bars were developed around the world, for the
benefit of RC constructions. Notable amongst them were Torsid from France, Tempcore
from Belgium and Thermex from East Germany. The first to produce TMT rebars in India
were Tata steel by about 1992 through Tempcore technology. Later Vizag steel came on line
followed by SAIL through technology. In the initial years, the production was restricted to
bars having diameter higher than about 16mm.
Elegant TMT bar is produced by thermo-mechanical treatment and not by cold twisting.
Therefore, there are no torsional residual stresses in the bar.
Bending
TMT Bars exhibit very high bendability and also re-bendability due to lower carbon content and
higher elongation. They can withstand bending and re-bending with internal diameters of 1D and
4D respectively, where D is the diameter of the Bar. It is easier to work with these TMT Bars
due to easy bendability.
Weldability
The materials which do not suffer from loss of strength at the weld joints are said to have
excellent weldabilty. Surprisingly in TMT bars there is no loss of strength due to its low carbon
content and can be easily welded with CTD bars. Further no pre-heating or post-heating is
necessary during welding.
Others
The significance of TMT bars is that it shows a combination of toughness, hardness, excellent
straightness, high strength and high fatigue resistance on dynamic loading.
3.3 INDIAN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TMT BARS
The IS-1786 (1985) stipulates the percentages of some of the constituents of TMT bars.
Table3.1 Composition of TMT bars (IS-1786)
Constituent Percent, Maximum TMT(Fe 415/FE
500/Fe 550)
TMT Fe TMT Fe TMT Fe
415 415 500 500 550 550
Carbon 0.25 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.2
Sulphur 0.05 0.0 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.055 0.045
6 5
Phosphorus 0.05 0.0 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.045
0 6 5
Sulphur and Phosphorus 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.1 0.1 0.09
1 5
Corrosion Resistant - - - - - - 0.75 min
Elements
Carbon Equivalent - - - - - - 0.53 max
Upto
28mm dia)
& 560
N/mm.sq.)
(above 28
mm dia)
are commercially available in strengths of 415, 500 and 550MPa. Considerable care has to be
exercised in the application of water quenching as improper application can lead to brittle and
hard rebars.
Fig.3.3 TMT bar showing soft core of ferrite-pearlite with strong and tough case of martensite
product is the familiar cold twisted deformed (CTD) bars. Although stretching and cold twisting
results in a residual strain in the steel, it also results in an increased proof strength. Upon
reloading, the steel follows a linear elastic path (with the same modulus of elasticity, ES as the
original mild steel) up to the point where the unloading started the new raised yield point.
compression. In case of TMT grade steel by virtue of definite yield point, design strength in axial
compression is 400 N/sq. mm. This design strength further divided by factors of 1.15 and 1.1,
gives strength of 400/1.15x1.1=316.2 N/sq.mm in place of 285.105 N/sq.mm corresponding to
CTD bars. In other words, an additional strength of 31 N/sq.mm is available if CTD bars are
replaced by TMT bars. This, in turn increases the load carrying capacity of a column of the given
cross-section and concrete grade with TMT bars in place of CTD bars. The following typical
example illustrates that, there are savings of steel by weight in a doubly reinforced beam, as the
definite yield point in TMT bars results in saving of compressed steel as compared to CTD bars.
This fig illustrates improper quenching treatment. There is a non-uniform hard periphery
signifying that the quenching has not taken place all round the periphery. Such bars are very
frequently noticed in India in mills that have made their quenching lines. Such bars should be
avoided by civil engineers.
3. Because of corrosion resistance TMT bars are employed in construction exposed to coastal,
marine or underground environment.eering
prope
rties and can be
4 PRODUCTION
4.1 QUALITY
Basically the desired properties of a thermo processed bar are
i. Minimum Yield strength 500 N/mm2 (or more)
ii. Minimum Tensile strength 10% more than yield strength subject to minimum 560 N/mm2.
iii. Stress Ratio (TS/YS) 1.10(generally 1.15 to 1.25)
iv. Minimum A5 Elongation 16 (generally 18 to 22).
v. Weldability
Basically, TMT is a good quality material if it is manufactured properly. (Dr.Vishwanatha,
2002). According to him the concern is the mills, capability to control the temperature of the bar
that gets into the cooling tube .The temperature of the bar that gets into the cooling tube must be
about 850-900 degrees, plus or minus 30-40 degrees. But if any particular mill cannot control the
temperature of the bar that gets into the cooling tube, then we don’t get a good product. Most of
the secondary sector rerolling mills in the country come in the category of cross country mills,
which are not that sophisticated and that refined as the major plants. In most of these mills, they
are not able to control the temperature of reinforcing bars when it gets into the cooling tube, if at
all they have installed that technology. When the temperature can not be controlled properly, the
product that comes out invariably is non uniform, and it can not satisfy the requirements. So, the
market is flooded with substandard material.
4.2 AVAILABILITY
TMT rebars are commercially available in strengths of 500 and 550 MPa. The brands from the
renowned manufactures like SAIL, TISCO, IISCO, RINL, VIZAG STEEL PLANT etc are
within the purview of desired limits on the chemical composition of steel given in IS 1786.
Dept. of Civil Engg.
22
THERMO MECHANICALLY TREATED[TMT] BARS
2009-2010
Various brands of TMT bars available in the market are SAIL TMT, SAIL TMT HCR, and
VIZAG TMT etc. The TMT reinforcing bars are available in almost all sizes: 8mm, 10mm,
12mm, 14mm, 16mm, 18mm, 20mm, 22mm, 25mm, 28mm, 32mm, 36mm, 40mm in standard
lengths & specific lengths up to a length of 20 meters.
As per today’s scenario there is an availability of some international brands namely THERMEX,
TEMPCORE. These bars are being manufactured to have greater strengths and good ductility so
that there is saving in steel coupled with safety. These are by far stiffer than that specified by IS:
1786-1985.
4.3 MARKETING
Production of TMT bars is not simple. It requires huge investments, expertise and stringent
process controls apart from quality inputs. Actual quality of steel gets deteriorated, unless proper
treatments are done. We find untreated re-bars are available in the market and being offered as
TMT bars made by integrated steel plants. These products are having very low physical
properties due to the absence of thermo-mechanical treatment and hence it very dangerous to use
these materials in construction activities.
The main steel plants produce about 1.5 million tones each year of what they strangely call TMT
rebars - this includes the Thermex bar production of SAIL at Durgapur and Bhilai steel plants.
Presumably we are talking Q&T rebars such as Thermex-as explained earlier, every mill in India
is legally making TMT bars. The Q&T rebars will become the preferred choice and it is expected
that by 2010 they will constitute 80 to 85% of the rebars made in the country against the present
50 to 55%. The CTD bars are definitely being phased out.
Some builders because of the lack of knowledge insist on CTD where inconsistency is very high,
because ultimately the strength is imparted by twisting the bar, which is a manual process.
Awareness of TMT bars is the order of the day.
coatings to steel, a change in the metallurgy of steel itself is finding its way now. A new
development on steel front is production of corrosion resistant steel, called CRS. Carbon content
in this steel is restricted to 0.18%, Manganese is absent, silicon is 0.45% and the percentage of
corrosion resistant elements such as chromium is as high as 1.5%... SAIL and TISCO have taken
great strides in this direction.
Further research towards production of fusion bound epoxy coated reinforcement steel and
corrosion resistant low alloy steel is under way. To meet with the increasing demand of electrical
industry SAIL has intensified its efforts to produce sophisticated silicon steel. Interesting results
in this direction are expected soon.
5 DISCUSSIONS
A versatile material, steel has played a vital role in the construction industry. With its multitude
of features like superior strength, toughness and ductility, high strength to cost ratio, improved
safety in construction and operation and greater flexibility, it has become the preferred material
in construction. However, the non-availability of the right quality, cost effective steel and
absence of corrosion resistance technology has been one of the major hurdles in its growing
popularity.
The Cold Twisted Deformed (CTD) bars did meet the demand for low-cost, high-strength
reinforced steel bars and were cheap alternatives to costly alloying elements such as Cr, Ni, Ti
etc. But these bars sacrificed two essential properties of weldability and elongation. The search
for a process better than CTD led to the development of TMT bars. With their high-strength,
high-ductility properties, TMT bars overtook the popularity of CTD bars.
However, there is a great concern on non-availability of quality TMT bars. The factors, as per
the TMT bars are considered, are raw materials, rolling mill and treatment process. Bar which is
manufactured without sacrificing any one of the above factors undoubtedly ensures a quality
TMT bar. Moreover, there is hardly any difference in appearance between standard and sub-
standard bars. Due to this there is a misguidance and confusion among clients and users. Hence it
is the responsibility of civil engineers to adopt a detailed examination for requisite properties and
verification of source which carries a paramount importance as per today’s scenario.
REFERENCES
1 C.S.Vishwanatha, “History in prospective- A journey through Indian reinforcing bars”,
The Indian concrete journal, Jan 2004, vol.78, pp14-18
2 S.R.Mediratta, “Steel reinforcement-Demand, quality and new application in India”, The
Indian concrete journal, Jan 2004, vol.78, pp.9-13.
3 P.Dayaratnam, “Guest editorial comments”, The Indian concrete journal, Jan 2004,
vol.78, pp.3-4.
4 C.S.Vishwanatha, “The ABC of TMT bars”, The Master builder, Oct-Nov 2004, vol.6,
pp.41
5 HY-TUF STEELS PVT LTD, www.hytuf.com
6 Jagvir Gaoyal, “Latest Developments on steel front”, www.tribuneindia.com
7 Kaushik.S.K. and Singh.B. “Influence of steel-making processes on the quality of
reinforcement”, The Indian concrete journal, July 2002, vol.76, pp.407-412.
8 Prabir C, Basu, Shylamoni P and Roshan A.D, “Characterization of steel reinforcement
for RC structures, An overview and related issues”, The Indian concrete journal, Jan
2004, vol.78, pp.22
9 Mary Land Metrics, http.mdmetric.com
10 SAIL, www.sail.co.in