Leukaemias: A Review: Aetiology and Pathogenesis
Leukaemias: A Review: Aetiology and Pathogenesis
Leukaemias: A Review: Aetiology and Pathogenesis
Leukaemias: a review annum. The age-specific incidence is highest in infancy and fairly
uniform in all other age groups.
PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH --:- 1 Crown Copyright Ó 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Bhatnagar N, et al., Leukaemias: a review, Paediatrics and Child Health (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en septiembre 24, 2017.
j.paed.2017.08.007
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYMPOSIUM: HAEMATOLOGY
Table 1
insidious presentation. The clinical features are a result of i) bone Chest radiography is needed to detect a mediastinal mass or
marrow failure and ii) organ infiltration (see Table 2). pleural effusion. Examination of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
examination should be performed at the same time as diagnostic
Investigations bone marrow and may reveal the presence of leukaemic cells
Haematological investigations at leukaemia presentation may even though the patient lacks neurological symptoms. Diagnostic
reveal anaemia, abnormal total and differential white cell count investigations are summarised in Tables 3e5.
and thrombocytopenia. There may be profound neutropenia
(<0.5 109/litre). Coagulopathy can be life-threatening in AML, Treatment
especially in acute promyelocytic leukaemia, but is rarely seen in
ALL. The peripheral blood film typically shows a variable num- The goal of therapy is to completely eradicate the disease and
ber of blasts (Figure 1). The bone marrow aspirate is hyper- reduce the risk of relapse while limiting treatment related
cellular with more than 20% leukaemic blasts. The blasts are toxicity. The treatment is ‘risk stratified’ and ‘response adapted’.
further characterised by morphology, immunophenotyping and Patients are treated on standard or more intensive treatment
cytogenetic analysis. A bone marrow trephine is sometimes arms depending on their presenting risk features and their
required if aspiration is difficult due to a densely infiltrated treatment thereafter adapted according to the molecular
marrow or myelofibrosis. response of their disease assessed by minimal residual disease
Serum urate, phosphate and potassium are raised in patients (MRD).
with a large leukaemic cell burden and can cause renal impair- Immediate therapy includes supportive care measures such as
ment that is complicated further by tumour lysis when treatment blood product support, controlling tumour lysis syndrome (TLS),
begins. Hepatic and renal dysfunction may occur due to leu- preventing renal failure by careful attention to fluids and elec-
kaemic infiltration. trolyte balance and treatment of infection with broad-spectrum
antibiotics.
Figure 1 Peripheral blood blasts in acute leukaemia (a) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, (b) acute myeloid leukaemia, (c) acute promyelocytic
leukaemia, (d) myeloid-leukaemia of Down syndrome.
PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH --:- 2 Crown Copyright Ó 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Bhatnagar N, et al., Leukaemias: a review, Paediatrics and Child Health (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en septiembre 24, 2017.
j.paed.2017.08.007
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYMPOSIUM: HAEMATOLOGY
Table 3
Immunological markers for classification of acute Cytogenetic risk classification in childhood ALL
lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and acute myeloid
Good risk Hyperdiploidy or high hyperdiploidy (>50
leukaemia (AML)
chromosomes)
B-lineage ALL CD19, cCD22, cCD79a, CD10, TdT t(12;21)/ETV6-RUNX1
T-lineage ALL CD7, CD5, CD2, cCD3, TdT High risk Intrachromosomal amplification of
AML CD13, CD33, CD117, cMPO, CD14, CD15, chromosome 21 (iAMP21)
CD16, CD42, CD61 t(17;19)(q22;p13)/TCF3(E2A)-HLF
MLL rearrangement
Table 4 Near haploidy (<30 chromosomes) and Low
Hypodiploidy (30e39 chromosomes)
PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH --:- 3 Crown Copyright Ó 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Bhatnagar N, et al., Leukaemias: a review, Paediatrics and Child Health (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en septiembre 24, 2017.
j.paed.2017.08.007
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYMPOSIUM: HAEMATOLOGY
The duration of induction regimen in UKALL 2011 is typically the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are dexamethasone, methotrexate
4e5 weeks with: and cytarabine. Specific intrathecal treatment, most commonly
(i) dexamethasone. Several large studies have reported a methotrexate is required to prevent or treat CNS disease. Other
decreased relapse risk with the use of dexamethasone options include cytarabine and triple chemotherapy with meth-
rather than prednisolone. otrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone. In UKALL2011 the
(ii) vincristine. randomisation of high dose versus standard dose intravenous
(iii) asparaginase. methotrexate is being addressed with regard to reducing CNS
and additionally for NCI high-risk cases relapse.
(iv) anthracycline. Cranial irradiation is effective CNS therapy but it is now
In UKALL 2011, a randomisation between a short course (14 reserved for patients with CNS relapse due to substantial asso-
days) of higher dose versus the standard course (28 days) of ciated side-effects such as neurotoxicity, endocrinopathy and
standard dose dexamethasone is being addressed to determine secondary cancer.
treatment related burden. This randomisation stopped in 2017
and all patients are now receiving standard dose dexamethasone Treatment of specific ALL subtypes
for 28 days. Patients with a specific subtype of precursor B-cell ALL, Phila-
MRD assessment at the end of induction (EOI) using sensitive delphia chromosome positive ALL (Phþ) benefit from targeted
methods directs further therapy in order to reduce the risk of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The Phþ chro-
relapse and prevent over-treatment. mosome, t(9;22) leads to the fusion of the BCR and ABL1 genes
Consolidation, interim maintenance and intensification resulting in tyrosine kinase activation.
therapy Imatinib is a selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine ki-
The goals of the next three blocks of therapy are to further nase and can be used with multi-agent ALL chemotherapy
reduce the disease burden and give intensive CNS directed without excessive toxicity resulting in high response rates.
therapy. A wide variety of chemotherapy agents are used during Recently a novel subgroup of patients has been described as Ph-
post-induction consolidation. chromosome like or BCR-ABL like ALL; these patients lack the
UKALL 2003 examined the value of augmented Berlin- BCR-ABL1 fusion protein yet they have a gene expression profile
Frankfurt-Mu € nster (BFM) therapy in patients with MRD Risk at similar to that of BCR-ABL1 ALL and similarly are at high risk of
EOI. The 5-year EFS were significantly better for patients in the relapse. A subset of these Ph-like patients harbour tyrosine ki-
intensification arm when compared with the standard arms due nase activating gene fusions such as EBF1-PDGFRB and achieve
to a halving the risk of relapse. The improved EFS translated into good response when treated with Imatinib in combination with
a better OS without an increased risk of TRM. conventional ALL therapy.
These results have led to a change in the UKALL 2011 protocol
where patients with MRD Risk at EOI will all receive augmented AML: Specific therapy and prognosis
BFM consolidation. MRD will again be measured upon recovery During the past 40 years, survival rates for patients with AML
from consolidation at week 14. Patients with MRD less than 0.5% have risen from less than 10% to more than 50% because of
at week 14 will form the MRD Intermediate Risk group and will intensification of chemotherapy, use of SCT and improved
continue augmented BFM therapy. Patients with MRD Low Risk supportive care. All major national groups report similar out-
at EOI continue on a standard intensity regimen. comes in childhood AML with OS 65e70% and EFS 50e60%.
All patients now receive only one delayed intensification (DI) However, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) remains
block as no survival benefit was found with two DI blocks in high at 35e40% and is the major cause of death. The current
UKALL 2003. Patients with MRD 0.5% at week 14 form the international study of childhood AML, Myechild01, aims to
MRD High Risk group and are very unlikely to be cured with build on the international experience gained and reduce or
ongoing chemotherapy thus, these patients will be eligible for the intensify therapy on risk group stratification based on cytoge-
national relapse/refractory ALL trial with novel cytoreductive netic and molecular genetic characteristics as well as response
therapies and considered for HSCT. to induction therapy using MRD instead of morphological
Continuation (or maintenance) therapy response alone (Table 8). The trial aims to identify patients who
All treatment regimens for ALL include a phase of mainte- are at high risk of relapse and offers these patients a HCST in
nance therapy in which patients are treated with less-intensive first remission.
chemotherapy to complete 2 years in girls and 3 years in boys.
Phases of therapy for AML
This consists of weekly low-dose methotrexate and daily 6-
Induction
mercaptopurine. Intensification of maintenance through admin-
This is the first phase of chemotherapy and should be started
istration of vincristine and steroid “pulses” has been widely
as soon as the diagnosis of AML is confirmed with the goal of
used. UKALL 2003 did not specifically assess the toxicity of these
inducing remission. The backbone of induction treatment has
pulses however, they were found to be a significant source of
been the combination of anthracycline and cytarabine. Many
morbidity and burden of care when discussed with patients and
clinical trials have been conducted testing variations of this
parents. UKALL 2011 therefore aims to examine their role in
standard of care. Myechild01 aims to study the effect of
maintenance therapy.
intensifying anthracycline therapy in induction as this has been
CNS-directed therapy
reported to improve outcome in adult AML patients. In this
Treatment for subclinical or overt CNS leukaemia is an inte-
study, induction treatment is further intensified in with the
gral part of ALL. The main drugs given systemically which reach
PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH --:- 4 Crown Copyright Ó 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Bhatnagar N, et al., Leukaemias: a review, Paediatrics and Child Health (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en septiembre 24, 2017.
j.paed.2017.08.007
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYMPOSIUM: HAEMATOLOGY
PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH --:- 5 Crown Copyright Ó 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Bhatnagar N, et al., Leukaemias: a review, Paediatrics and Child Health (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en septiembre 24, 2017.
j.paed.2017.08.007
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SYMPOSIUM: HAEMATOLOGY
PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH --:- 6 Crown Copyright Ó 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Bhatnagar N, et al., Leukaemias: a review, Paediatrics and Child Health (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en septiembre 24, 2017.
j.paed.2017.08.007
Para uso personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.