Scribd
Upload
115 views1 page

Tabel 1. Konduktivitas Termal Beberapa Jenis Batuan (Saptadji, 2002)

The document presents a table showing the thermal conductivity values of various rock types based on measurements from 11 different sources. The table lists the thermal conductivity in W/mK for rock types including sandstone, claystone, mudstone, shale, kaolinite, glauconite, siltstone, limestone, marl, dolomite, halite, chert, quartzite, granite, basalt, tuff, conglomerate and coal. The thermal conductivity values listed vary between sources and include the average and standard deviation for some rock types.

Uploaded by

dody24
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
115 views1 page

Tabel 1. Konduktivitas Termal Beberapa Jenis Batuan (Saptadji, 2002)

The document presents a table showing the thermal conductivity values of various rock types based on measurements from 11 different sources. The table lists the thermal conductivity in W/mK for rock types including sandstone, claystone, mudstone, shale, kaolinite, glauconite, siltstone, limestone, marl, dolomite, halite, chert, quartzite, granite, basalt, tuff, conglomerate and coal. The thermal conductivity values listed vary between sources and include the average and standard deviation for some rock types.

Uploaded by

dody24
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

29

Tabel 1. Konduktivitas termal beberapa jenis batuan (Saptadji, 2002).

Sources
Lithology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Sandstone 7.1 4.2 ± 1.4 3.1 ± 1.3 3.7 ± 1.2 2.8 3.7 ± 1.2 4.7 ± 2.8
Claystone 2.9 2.0 1.8
Mudstone 2.9 2.0 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.4
Shale 2.9 1.5 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 0.4 1.4 2.1 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 1.2
Kaolinite 1.8 ± 0.3
Glauconite 0.5 ± 0.2
Siltstone 2.9 2.7 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 1.3 2.7 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.9 2.7 ± 0.2
Limestone 3.1 2.9 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 0.9 2.21 2.8 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 3.0 2.8 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.6
Marl 3.2 2.1 ± 0.7 3.0 ± 1.1 2.7 ± 0.5 2.4 ± 0.5
Dolomite 5.0 ± 0.6 3.1 ± 1.4 4.7 ± 0.8 4.8 ± 1.5 4.7 ± 1.1 3.7 ± 1.8
Halite 5.5 ± 1.8 5.7 ± 1.0 5.4 ± 1.0 5.4 ± 0.3 5.9
Chert 4.2 ± 1.5 1.4 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.5
Quartzite 6.0 5.0 ± 2.4 5.9 ± 0.8 3.5 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 1.9
Granite 3.4 ± 1.2 3.5 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.6
Basalt 1.8 1.7 1.7 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.2 1.5
Tuff 1.7 ± 0.3
Conglomerate 2.4 ± 0.8 3.2 ± 1.8 2.1 ± 1.0
Coal 0.3 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.04 0.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1
Loose sand 2.44 ± 0.8
*Matrix conductivity values, only representing bulk conductivity when ϕ = 0
Sources: 1 = Beardsmore (1996), 2 = Majorowicz and Jessop (1981), 3 = Beach, Jones, and Majorowicz (1987), 4 = Raznjevic (1976), 5 = Reiter and Jessop (1985),
6 = Taylor, Judge, and Allen (1986), 7 = Roy et al. (1981), 8 = Reiter and Tovar (1982), 9 = Touloukian et al. (1970), 10 = Drury (1986), 11 = Barket (1996).

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy