Optics Review
Optics Review
Optics Review
REVIEW OF OPTICS
by
August–December 2003
c C. D. Cantrell (06/2003)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Aerospace
Sensors, displays, targeting, and communications
• Industrial
Welding, machining & writing
Imaging and lithography
• Medical
Surgery, photodynamic therapy, ...
Monitoring
Telemedicine (requires broadband communications)
• Business and entertainment
Imaging and projection (increasingly digital, but requires analog optics)
Information storage and retrieval (DVDs, ...)
• Telecommunications
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Ray optics
Snell’s laws of reflection and refraction at dielectric interfaces
Total internal reflection
When can one use ray optics instead of wave optics?
Applications of ray optics will include slab and fiber waveguides
• Plane electromagnetic waves
Polarization
Refractive index
Phase-velocity dispersion
• Reflection coefficients of plane waves at dielectric interfaces
Fresnel’s formulas
Brewster’s angle
Applications will include polarizing prisms
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Imaging
Refraction at spherical surfaces; thin lenses
Numerical aperture
• Interference
2-slit interference (Young’s fringes)
Multiple-slit interference
Interferometers
Applications will include modulators, multiplexers and demultiplexers
• Diffraction
Single slit
Multiple slits and diffraction gratings
Applications will include pulse compression
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
Frequency
(Hertz) 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015
ELF VF VLF LF MF HF VHF UHF SHF EHF
Twisted Pair
Optical
Fiber
Coaxial Cable
Wavelength 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6
in space
(meters)
ELF = Extremely low frequency MF = Medium frequency UHF = Ultrahigh frequency
VF = Voice frequency HF = High frequency SHF = Superhigh frequency
VLF = Very low frequency VHF = Very high frequency EHF = Extremely high frequency
LF = Low frequency
PHASE VELOCITY
INDEX OF REFRACTION
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
PHASE-VELOCITY DISPERSION
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
SNELL’S LAWS
• The normal to a dielectric interface and the incident ray define the plane
of incidence
The incident (i), reflected (r) and refracted (transmitted) (t) rays are all
in the plane of incidence
Snell’s law of reflection:
θr = θi
Snell’s law of refraction:
n2 sin θt = n1 sin θi
sin θi n2 v1
= =
sin θt n1 v2
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
θi θr
n1
n2 n 2 > n1
θt
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Occurs when a ray passes from a more dense medium into a less dense
medium (n2 < n1)
From Snell’s law of refraction,
n1
sin θt =sin θi > sin θi
n2
When sin θt = 1, θt = 90◦ ⇒ refracted ray goes along the interface
When this happens, θi is equal to the critical angle θc, where
n2
sin θc =
n1
For rays such that θi > θc, there is no refracted ray
◦ All energy is reflected ⇒ total internal reflection
Main application: Guided waves in dielectric slabs and fibers
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Lenses are used for collimation and to focus light into fibers and waveguides
For a thin lens with spherical surfaces (radii of curvature R1 and R2), the
focal length is
1 1 1
= (n − 1) +
f R1 R2
where n is the refractive index of the lens material
The distances do and di of an object and the image formed by a thin lens
are given by the equation
1 1 1
+ =
do di f
◦ Linear magnification:
di 1
M= =
do (do/f ) − 1
◦ Angular magnification:
1 tan αi/2
=
M tan αo/2
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
1
θ
If n = 1, then 0 ≤ NA ≤ 1
◦ 0 means that no light gets into the system
◦ 1 means that all of the light propagating towards the system gets in
◦ Power into system ∝ (NA)2
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
WAVE OPTICS
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
MAXWELL’S EQUATIONS
∇·B=0 ∇·D=ρ
∂B ∂D
∇×E=− ∇×H=J+
∂t ∂t
• From the first line, the normal components of D and B are continuous across
a dielectric interface
• From the second line, the tangential components of E and H are continuous
across a dielectric interface
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Assumptions:
Homogeneous, isotropic, lossless, dielectric medium
Plane wave propagating in the +z direction
• Fields:
E = x̂E1 + ŷE2e ej(ωt−βz)
jψ
(E1, E2 real)
1 j(ωt−βz) 1
H= −x̂E2e + ŷE1 e
jψ
= ẑ × E
η η
The ratio of the magnitudes of E and H is the characteristic impedance
of the medium, µ
η=
Phase velocity: 1 ω
v=√ =
µ β
Time-averaged Poynting vector:
2 2
1 ∗ 1 E1 + E2
S = Re [E × H] = ẑ
2 2 η
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
POLARIZATION (1)
PLANE OF POLARIZATION
Y
E
X
Pla
Pol ne o
ari f
zat
ion
0 Z
5
10
15
1
0 X
-1
-1 0 1
Y
• Red curve: Tip of the E vector Blue curve: Tip of the H vector
The plane of polarization is the x − z plane
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
POLARIZATION (2)
• Circular polarization:
π
ψ=± , E2 = E1
2
Real components of E:
Ex = E1 cos(ωt − βz), Ey = ∓E1 sin(ωt − βz)
For fixed z, the E vector describes a circle in the x − y plane
◦ ψ = π2 (− sign on Ey ): Right circular polarization
◦ ψ = − π2 (+ sign on Ey ): Left circular polarization
◦ The terms “right” and “left” circular polarization are confusing, because
a right-circularly-polarized wave actually describes a left-handed screw
as the wave propagates in z
For right-circularly-polarized light, the tip of the E vector rotates
clockwise in the x − y plane, from the point of view of someone
looking toward the source (in the −z direction)
c C. D. Cantrell (03/2004)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
POLARIZATION (3)
• Elliptical polarization:
π
E2
= E1, or E2 = E1
±
and ψ = and ψ
= 0
2
Real components of E:
Ex = E1 cos(ωt − βz), Ey = E2 cos(ωt − βz + ψ)
For fixed z, the E vector describes an ellipse in the x − y plane
◦ Eliminating ζ = ωt − βz from the equations for Ex and Ey results in
2 2
Ex Ey Ex Ey
+ − 2 cos ψ = sin2 ψ
E1 E2 E1 E2
which is the equation of an ellipse that makes an angle θ with the x
axis, where
2E1E2 cos ψ
tan 2θ =
E12 − E22
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
POLARIZATION (4)
POLARIZATION (5)
POLARIZATION (6)
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
Er,x
V1,–
V1,+ V2,+ Ei,x Et,x
Z1 Z2
η1 η2
• Boundary conditions:
V and I are continuous at the transmission-line interface
Ex and Hy are continuous at the dielectric interface
• Voltage reflection coefficient:
Z2 − Z1
ρ=
Z2 + Z1
• Electric-field reflection coefficient:
η 2 − η1 n 2 − n 1
1 1
n2 − n1
ρ= = 1 1 =−
η2 + η1 n2 + n1
n2 + n1
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• For all angles of incidence except 0◦ (normal incidence), the reflection coef-
ficient of a plane wave depends on the wave’s polarization
The useful orthogonal states of polarization for this situation are called
TE and TM
◦ In TE (or ⊥) polarization, the E field is perpendicular to the plane of
incidence
The plane of incidence is the plane defined by the direction of the
incident field and the normal to the dielectric surface
◦ In TM (or ) polarization, the E field is in the plane of incidence
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Impedance analysis
Apply to the tangential components of E and H
◦ The tangential components are continuous at a dielectric interface, like
V and I in a transmission line
In the medium from which the wave is incident,
Ei,x Er,x
Z1, = =− = η1 cos θ
Hi,x Hr,x
Ei,y Er,y
Z2,⊥ = − = = η1 sec θ
Hi,y Hr,y
(the plane of incidence is the x − z plane)
Reflection coefficient for TM wave (for example):
Z2, − Z1, η2 cos θt − η1 cos θi
ρ = =
Z2, + Z1, η2 cos θt + η1 cos θi
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
FRESNEL FORMULAS
• The normal to a dielectric interface and the incident ray define the plane
of incidence
E components that are in (parallel to) the plane of incidence do not
interfere with field components that are perpendicular to the plane of
incidence
Transmission and reflection coefficients:
2n1 cos θi 2 sin θt cos θi
τ = =
n2 cos θi + n1 cos θt sin(θi + θt) cos(θi − θt)
2n1 cos θi 2 sin θt cos θi
τ⊥ = =
n1 cos θi + n2 cos θt sin(θi + θt)
n2 cos θi − n1 cos θt tan(θi − θt)
ρ = − =−
n2 cos θi + n1 cos θt tan(θi + θt)
n1 cos θi − n2 cos θt sin(θi − θt)
ρ⊥ = =−
n1 cos θi + n2 cos θt sin(θi + θt)
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
θB θr
n1
n2
θt
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
DICHROIC POLARIZERS
BREWSTER’S-ANGLE POLARIZERS
POLARIZING PRISMS
OPTICAL POWER
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFERENCE (1)
INTERFERENCE (2)
INTERFERENCE (3)
INTERFEROMETERS (1)
• Wavefront-splitting
Young’s 2-slit interference experiment
• Amplitude-splitting
Michelson interferometer
Mach-Zehnder interferometer
Fabry-Pérot interferometer
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
http://www.matter.org.uk/schools/Content/Interference/laserinterference.html
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
X
P
r2
x
s/2 r1
Z
–s/2 D
s 2 s 2
r1 = x+ + D2 + y 2, r2 = x− + D2 + y 2
2 2
⇒ r12 − r22 = 2sx
But r12 − r22 = (r1 − r2)(r1 + r2) ≈ (r1 − r2)2D
sx
⇒ r1 − r2 ≈
D
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• The difference of distances from the two slits to the observation point P is
sx
r 1 − r2 ≈
D
where x = position on screen
s = spacing between slits
D = distance from slits to observation screen
• Phase difference between waves arriving at P from the two slits:
2πn 2πns
δ= (r1 − r2) ≈ x = κx
λ0 λ0 D
This implies intereference fringes that are equally spaced in x
Use general formula for I, setting E1 = E2 and ê1 = ê2 since waves from
two slits have same amplitude and polarization
Result: Intensity I ∝ 1 + cos(κx)
c C. D. Cantrell (10/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
• Let δ be the phase difference between waves arriving from adjacent slits
2π
δ = s sin θ
λ
where θ is the angle that the waves make with the normal to the screen
• Intensity at P is
2
2
jδ sin(N δ/2)
I(P ) ∝ e + e2jδ + · · · + e(N −1)jδ =
sin 12 δ
This implies very sharp maxima when δ = 2mπ, i.e., when
s sin θ = mλ
The same analysis applies to simple diffraction gratings
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
GRATING FUNCTION
sin (N δ/2 ) 2
gN (δ) =
2
( )
sin( 12 δ)
2000
1500
N = 41
2
gN (δ)
1000
500
0
0 2 4 6 8
δ
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (2)
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (3)
1.00
insertion loss
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0
δ (radians)
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (4)
L L
Z1 Z2 Z3 η1 η2 η3
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (5)
L L
Z1 Z2 Z3 η1 η2 η3
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (6)
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
ANTI-REFLECTION COATING
π
• Substitute k2L = ⇒ cos(k2L) = 0
2
into the formula for the reflection coefficient,
ZL − η1 η2(η3 − η1) cos(k2L) + j(η22 − η1η3) sin(k2L)
ρ= = ,
Z L + η1 η2(η3 + η1) cos(k2L) + j(η22 + η1η3) sin(k2L)
to get
η22 − η1η3 n1n3 − n22
ρ= 2 =
η2 + η1η3 n1n3 + n22
The reflection coefficient is zero if η22 = η1η3, i.e. if
√
n2 = n1 n3
◦ This works only at one wavelength because L = 14 λ
√
◦ It may not be possible to find a material such that n2 = n1n3
◦ Example: The power (and intensity) reflection coefficient √ of a quarter-
wave MgF2 coating (n2 = 1.38) on glass (n3 ≈ 1.50, 1.50 ≈ 1.22)
is ρ2 = 0.01, versus ρ2 = 0.04 for uncoated glass in air (n1 = 1.00)
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (7)
• Fabry-Pérot interferometer
Entrance and exit media are the same (n3 = n1)
Electric-field reflection coefficient in the entrance medium:
(η22 − η12) sin(k2L)
ρ=j
2η1η2 cos(k2L) + j(η22 + η12) sin(k2L)
Power (and intensity) reflection coefficient in the entrance medium:
(η22 − η12)2 sin2(k2L) (ρ12ρ23)2 sin2(k2L)
|ρ| = 2 2
2
=1
4η1 η2 + (η2 − η1 ) sin (k2L) 4 (1 + ρ12ρ23)2 + (ρ12ρ23)2 sin2(k2L)
2 2 2 2
where
n1 − n2
ρ12 = , ρ23 = −ρ12
n1 + n2
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
INTERFEROMETERS (8)
• Fabry-Pérot interferometer
The transmission of the interferometer is a maximum when the phase
change k2L of a beam traversing the plate is an integral multiple of π
This example applies to GaAs and related compound semiconductors
1.0
Transmission
0.8
0.6
0.4
n1 = 1.0, n2 = 3.5
0.2
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0
k2 L (radians)
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
LONGITUDINAL MODES
• Fabry-Pérot interferometer
Transmission is a maximum when
2n2π λ
k2L = mπ ⇒ L = mπ ⇒ 2L = m
λ n2
i.e., when the round-trip distance in the interferometer is an
integral multiple of the wavelength in the medium
This is the condition for constructive interference of a wave that has just
entered the interferometer with a wave that has traversed the interferom-
eter once
The mth longitudinal mode has a wavelength λm and a frequency fm
2n2L c
λm = ⇒ fm = m
m 2n2L
Frequency spacing between adjacent longitudinal modes:
c
∆f =
2n2L
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
DIFFRACTION (1)
DIFFRACTION (2)
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
Notice the “Poisson bright spot” in the center of the geometrical shadow!
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
Note that the diffraction pattern is widest in the direction in which the
aperture is narrowest
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
FRAUNHOFER DIFFRACTION
• Plane-wave limit
• Criterion for destructive interference:
s sin θ ≈ mλ
For small angles (θ 1), and for the first minimum,
λ
θ≈
s
• Fraunhofer diffraction by a slit of width s:
Intensity
θ
s
c C. D. Cantrell (02/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
θ2
θ1
a sin θ2
a
a sin θ1
c C. D. Cantrell (10/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
ORDERS OF DIFFRACTION
c C. D. Cantrell (10/2002)
COORDINATES FOR THE DIFFRACTION INTEGRAL
–k2
q
k1
s
r ρ r1
s
r
c C. D. Cantrell (06/1997)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (10/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
0.8
0.7
Intensity = |E|2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
x
c C. D. Cantrell (10/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
BRAGG REFLECTION
• Plane-wave limit
• Bragg’s law for constructive interference of plane waves reflected from a
refractive-index grating:
2Λ sin θ = mλ/n̄
Λ is the grating period, m is an integer, and n̄ is the mean refractive index
of the medium
Λ sin θ
c C. D. Cantrell (08/2002)
The University of Texas at Dallas Erik Jonsson School
PhoTEC
c C. D. Cantrell (01/2002)