Cooperative Learning
Cooperative Learning
Characteristic features
1. Has two important components:
o A cooperative incentive structure- one where two or more individuals are interdependent
for a reward.
o A cooperative task structure- a situation in which two or more individuals are allowed,
encouraged or required to work together on some tasks, coordinating their efforts to
complete the task.
2. Students work in teams to tackle academic tasks.
3. Reward systems are group-oriented rather than individually-oriented.
4. The interactions within the group are controlled by the members themselves.
5. Teams are made up of mixed abilities – high, average and low achievers.
6. Each individual learner is accountable for his/her learning.
7. The group reflects on and evaluates the group process they underwent.
Tutoring arrangements
a. Instructional Tutoring. Older students help younger ones on a One-to-one or one-to-a-
group basis.
b. Same age Tutoring. Children who can act as an interactive pairs, more able ones to
assist the less able.
c. Monitorial Tutoring. The class may be divided into groups and monitors are assigned to
lead each group.
d. Instructional Tutoring. Older students help younger ones on a One-to-one or one-to-a-
group basis.
e. Same age Tutoring. Children who can act as an interactive pairs, more able ones to
assist the less able.
f. Monitorial Tutoring. The class may be divided into groups and monitors are assigned to
lead each group.
Instructional characteristics
1. The tutees receive individualized instruction.
2. The tutees receive more instruction.
3. Rapport between tutor and tutee may be readily established considering that they belong
more or less to the same age group.
4. The teacher is free at the same time to do other classroom chores while the members are
being handled by the tutors.
5. Reduces a large class into smaller working groups.
6. Discipline problems are lessened because there are more assistants looking after small
groups.
7. The spirit of cooperation, camaraderie and reciprocity are highlighted.
8. The tutors stand to gain more since teaching is excellent learning situation.
9. The tutors can likewise improve their own self-concept.
Partner learning
Learning with partner
“study buddy”
Inductive Method
• Opposite of deductive method.
• Also called indirect instruction
• (Inquiry method or problem solving method and project methods).
Advantages
• The learners are more engaged in the teaching-learning process.
• Learning becomes more interesting at the outset because we begin with the experiences
of our students.
• It helps the development of our learners’ higher order thinking skills (HOTS).
Disadvantages
• It requires more time and so less subject matter will be covered.
• It demands expert facilitating skills on the part of the teacher.
Other Approaches
1. Blended Learning
Is learning that is facilitated by the effective combination of different modes of delivery,
models of teaching and styles of learning, and is based on transparent communication
amongst all parties involved with a course (Heinze, A.; C Procter. 2004)
2. Reflective Teaching
Students/ Teachers learn through an analysis and evaluation of past experiences. Without
analysis, no new learning and ideas can be constructed.
Guidelines for Effective Reflective Teaching/Learning
• Allocate sufficient time for reflection. Time must be considered in planning the learning
activity.
• Schedule a short briefing activity as to recapture the experience and think about.
• The teacher serves as a facilitator and guide in developing the skill in analyzing a past
learning experience.
• Encourage the students to recount the experiences to others, thereby strengthening the
insights gained.
• Attend to feelings especially the positive and pleasant ones.
• Evaluate the experience in the light of the learners.
Things to ask
1. Did I motivate them enough to continue on?
2. Are the students learning from the activity? If so, why? If not, why?
3. Am I relating the lesson to their knowledge and interest? How can I do better?
4. How good was my classroom management skill?
5. 5. Did anything significant occur? If so, describe. Why did it happen?
6. 6. Was the strategy I used the most effective one? What other strategies might have been
effective?
7. 7. Did I exhibit flexibility in modifying my lesson according to their responses?
8. 8. What I have learned about my own teaching? Have I become a better teacher?
Van Linden and Fertman (1998)
Make sure each group understands the goals, procedures, tasks and methods of
evaluation. The experiential learning process of reflection-looking back at what you have
learned, gaining useful insight from the analysis, and applying this new knowledge to
daily work- helps students to understand the meaning and effect of their contribution.
Lambert (2003)
Schools are increasingly using reflection tools for learning and assessment, whether in
the forms of portfolios, journals, dialogue, or products and performances resulting from
problem-based learning. Rather than discussing only data relating to test scores, as is the
norm these days, we need also to discuss data that emerges from reflection as legitimate
measures of success and to include students in any dialogue.
Summing Up
Learning that results from reflective teaching is best described as one borne or
experiences that have been deeply thought of, analyzed and evaluated.
Reflection is inseparable from experience. Experience is not yet best learning, reflection
is.
Metacognitive Approach
• Meta = beyond
• Therefore, a metacognitive approach is an approach that goes beyond cognition.
• It has something to do with our students monitoring their own cognitive processes as they
are engaged in their cognitive task.