Supplier APQP Requirements Matrix: D & C These Items To Be Included On Gap Analysis Sheet With Actions

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document tracks the progress of a supplier through the APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) process by listing targets and actual status for various elements on multiple pages.

The document is a supplier APQP requirements matrix that is used to track a supplier's progress and status through the APQP process for a particular part or program.

It tracks elements like design reviews, prototyping, testing, production preparation and other elements to ensure the supplier is on track for a successful launch.

Supplier APQP Requirements Matrix Latest Revision Date

MY/Program: Actual" status symbol O item meets target (Shift + letter "o" key)
Supplier Name: key: D item does not meet target; plans exist; low risk (Shift + "d" key)
Part Number(s) C item does not meet target with high risk (Shift + "c" key)
Part Name: N/A not applicable
Risk Assessment: note: D & C these items to be included on gap analysis sheet with actions
Supplier Champion:
phone/e-mail

Magna Mirrors Program Management Process (PMP) Stage


MSR 4.1- date xx/yy/zz MSR 4.2- date xx/yy/zz MSR 4.3 - date xx/yy/zz MSR 4.4 - date xx/yy/zz MSR 5 - date xx/yy/zz
Material Required Date Qty Material Required Date Qty Material Required Date Qty Material Required Date Qty Material Required Date Qty
Per Releases
APQP Elements Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Preliminary DFMEA created for supplier DFMEA reviewed and signed for DFMEA updated to current design level DFMEA updated to current design level
responsible components or supplier has supplier responsible components or
reviewed Magna Mirrors (MM) DFMEA. supplier has reviewed MM DFMEA.
High RPN’s have action plans with timing
High RPNs have action plans with
timing that meets tool kick-off date.
1. Design FMEA
Initial design review complete with 100% design concerns addressed. AIAG Design changes reviewed and 100% Design changes reviewed and 100% Design changes reviewed and 100%
supplier and MM per AIAG A-2 or A-2 checklist or equivalent complete and acceptable acceptable acceptable
2. Design Review) equivalent open issues resolved
Agreement with MM on performance and Prototype testing and measurement is All DV testing to specifications is initiated All DV testing complete. Test results
functional validation plan; Identify key 100% complete. per plan confirm product meets all requirements
dimensional characteristics for layout on
3. Design Verification Plan prototypes

Major program elements are documented Major program elements are Major program elements are documented Major program elements are documented
to meet the program deliverables. documented to meet the program to meet the program deliverables. to meet the program deliverables.
4. Master Timing Plan deliverables.
Tool lead time/maker concept Tool maker and lead time fixed w/ Tool tryout complete and problems Tool at current design release level
gauge and fixture design concepts schedule identified tooling issues 100% resolved
Capacity study complete Gauge plan complete and approved by Gauges complete and verified Machine/fixture issues 100% resolved
Supplier manufacturing facility identified MM Machine/fixtures complete and problems Maintenance PM implemented
Machine/fixture plan complete and identified with countermeasures Set up instructions/process parameters
approved AIAG checklist A-5 or equivalent initiated 100%
and open issues identified. Facility 100% ready per A-5.

5. Facilities, Tool and Gauges


Control plan contains DV test plan Prototype build issues fed back into pre-
elements and prototype layout launch control plan.
6. Prototype Build Control Plan requirements
Prototype build requirements are prototype parts delivered on time at
documented and agreed with MM quality level expected. Build issues have
7. Prototype Builds (quantity, dates, lead time) been addressed.

Surrogate test data submitted to MM DV failures were addressed in the


Engineering and QA if available DFMEA and corrective actions
incorporated into the design.
DVP&R includes requirements form
8. Design Verification Testing all pertinent specifications
preliminary list of critical characteristics layout information complete, process
identified and agreed with MM capability known and can meet drawing
Surrogate capability data reviewed with tolerances or actions in place to resolve
9. Prototype Part Layout and MM Engineering
MMS/MMC Ppk
CAD data reviewed for feasibility issues Drawings and specifications released and 100% design change implemented 100% design change implemented 100% design change implemented
and submitted to MM. verified against CAD data
Drawings contain appropriate material
and performance requirements
Drawings contain critical and safety
characteristics
10. Drawings and Specifications
11. Team Feasibility Team Feasibility Commitment has been
reviewed by team and signed off as
Signed off to current design level Signed off to current design level Signed off to current design level Signed off to current design level

Commitment approved
Initial process flow is complete; used to Process Flow complete and AIAG A-6 Process Flow complete and AIAG A-6 or Process Flow complete and AIAG A-6
develop PFMEA and Control Plan. AIAG checklist or equivalent complete with no equivalent checklist complete with no checklist or equivalent complete with no
checklist A-6 or equivalent initiated and open issues. Launch containment is open issues open issues
12. Manufacturing Process Flow open issues identified with actions addressed in flow.
Chart
PFMEA reviewed with Magna Mirrors and PFMEA complete and approved by PFMEA complete and approved by PFMEA complete and approved by
signed. High RPNs have action plans Magna Mirrors. AIAG checklist A-7 or Magna Mirrors. AIAG checklist A-7 or Magna Mirrors. AIAG checklist A-7
with timing. AIAG checklist A-7 or equivalent complete with no open issues. equivalent complete with no open issues. complete with no open issues. PFMEA
equivalent has been initiated and open Packaging, labeling and shipping are PFMEA updated based on PPAP and updated based on early production runs.
issues identified. included in analysis. early production runs. High RPN and high High RPN and high severity failures have
severity failures have action plans action plans completed.
completed.

13. Process FMEA


Plan for measurement of prototype parts Gauge R&R complete for prototype as Gauge R&R complete with actual Gauges and instructions updated to
exists and agreed with MM. agreed in phase 4.1. Concerns with operators. R&R over 10% has action current design level. Gauge R&R
Requirements for Gauge R&R agreed measurement system addressed in plans to address or Magna Mirrors complete with actual operators. R&R
with MM production gauge or fixture design. approval. Gauge instructions exist. A 10% or Magna Mirrors approval. Gauge
plan exists for gauge correlation study correlation study complete and
14. Measurement Systems with MM incoming inspection. acceptable.
Evaluation
Pre-launch control plan complete and Controls listed in pre-launch control plan
approved by MM. Launch containment is have been audited and open issues
documented in plan. AIAG checklist A-8 identified with actions and timing.
or equivalent is complete with no open
15. Pre-launch Control Plan issues.

Production ramp-up plan defined to Production schedules fixed in MRP No delivery issues during SOP
support Magna Mirrors pre-production systems including raw material and
and production requirements component releases to support Magna
16. Production Ramp-up Mirrors requirements. Requirements for
MMSC are agreed with MM
Schedule
Prototype packaging concept approved Production packaging plan reviewed with Packaging design complete and reviewed Testing complete with no open issues. No labeling or packaging issues during
17. Packaging Specifications with MM MM with MM. Testing plan established Packaging Declaration submitted and SOP
(PKG Declaration) approved by MM.

Production control plan complete and Process audit complete to control plan to
approved by MM. Launch containment is confirm effective implementation.
documented in plan. AIAG checklist A-8
or equivalent is complete with no open
18. Production Control Plan issues.

Plans exist for production trial run with Trial run complete with production
trained operators and production process. process, tooling and equipment.
AIAG checklist A-4 or equivalent Problems identified and corrective actions
updated. complete. Scrap rate and cycle time
Scrap rate and cycle time objectives vs. 100% to plan.
plan understood with action plans.
19. Production Trial Run
Part layout requirements agreed with MM Part layout complete and parts match MM
- number of pieces, dimensions, etc. drawing. Dimensional results approved by
20. Production Part Layout Plans exist to complete on-time. MM.

A launch readiness review has been A launch readiness review has been A launch readiness review has been A Run-at-Rate has been completed and Open issues from the Run-at-Rate have
conducted with MM to review status of conducted with MM to review status of conducted with MM to review status of open issues affecting SOP have been resolved
program and deliverables listed above program and deliverables listed above. program and deliverables listed above. adequate plans to meet program timing.
AIAG checklist A-4or equivalent initiated AIAG checklist A-4 or equivalent initiated
21. Launch Readiness Review and open issues identified with actions and open issues identified with actions
and timing. and timing.
Meeting
A plan exists for completing PpK studies PpK studies complete and meet PPAP
in support of PPAP requirements. Containment plans are in
place and documented on the control
22. Preliminary Process plan for PpK < 1.67 or unstable
processes.
Capability Study
A test plan exists for PV testing including Testing per plan. Plan updated to current Testing to all material and performance
specifications, tests, sample size, design level specifications is complete and product
23. Production Validation Testing requirements, and test facility meets requirements

Boundary sample plan reviewed with MM Boundary samples agreed and signed off
SQA by MM
24. Boundary Samples
25. Production Part Approval Requirement for Appearance Approval
(AAR) is agreed with MM. AAR is
PPAP status full approval PPAP status full approval

(PPAP) complete if applicable.


Production shipping schedules No critical delivery occurrences or
established to support MM requirements paperwork errors
Delivery and frequency method agreed
26. Production Part Delivery at with MM
MRD
Design has been reviewed for compliance IMDS complete. 'Received' number has IMDS complete to current design level.
to ELV requirements. Concerns have been provided to MM 'Received' number has been provided to
27. IMDS Data Entered into been reviewed with MM Engineering. MM
System
Supplier Management
Approval

* Overall program rating -


GREEN, YELLOW or RED

* Project Manager

* Top Management
Program Name: 0
Champion: 0 Worksheet Revision Date:

Key to "Status" symbols: "O" = item meets target (Shift + letter o); "D" = item does not meet target; plans exist; low risk (Shift + d); "C" = item does not meet target with high risk (Shift + c)
MSR Current
Stage APQP Element Target Actual Gap Explanation Counter Measure Responsibility Due Date Status
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy