Experiment 5 Chem 26 Atq
Experiment 5 Chem 26 Atq
Experiment 5 Chem 26 Atq
A. M. C. F. ABLANG1
1National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, College of Science
University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
Date Submitted: 6 March 2019
Date Performed: 25 February 2019
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
2. What is the Ksp expression for Ca(OH)2? How was the Ksp determined through the
experiment conducted? What about s?
Harris (2010), Harvey (2000), and Skoog (2013) state the theoretical Ksp for Ca(OH)2 to be
6.5 x 10-6, given the expression in Equation 1. An average Ksp of 4.88 x 10-5 was experimentally
determined through using distilled water as the analyte in the experiment, calculating the ion
concentrations of both Ca2+ and OH- and utilizing the Ksp expression to obtain the solubility
product constant. At constant temperature for a saturated solution, Ksp is the product of the
concentration of constituent ions, each raised to the number of ions in one formula unit of the
compound (Harris, 2010; Petrucci, 2017).
Molar solubility s was obtained by representing the number of dissolved moles of Ca(OH) 2
per liter of saturated solution and substituting that in the Ksp expression. Both methods are also
done in Petrucci (2017), Whitten (2014), and Skoog (2013).
While the experimental Ksp obtained results in a percent error of approximately 651%,
this is rationalized by not taking into account ion activities by the components in equilibrium
(Petrucci, 2017).
3. After presenting your experimental results (Ksp and s) for the different equilibrium
systems examined, discuss the effects of common ions and increasing ionic strength on
the solubility of the Ca(OH)2 precipitate. Do they coincide with what was expected from
theory? Explain.
Adding CaCl2 to the solution resulted in a Ksp of 4.55484 x 10-5 and an s of 0.022494, which
are both slightly lower than the calculated values without the second solute. Le Châtelier's
principle posits that when the concentration of one reactant is increased, a mixture in equilibrium
will shift the mechanism to the direction that consumes it. In solubility experiments, this is
manifested through the lower solubility of sparingly soluble ionic compounds when in the presence
of a constituent ion. The addition of Ca2+ in the calcium hydroxide equilibrium shown in Equation 2
increases the concentration in the forward products, so the equilibrium shifts toward the reverse,
inducing precipitation of Ca(OH)2 and lowering its solubility (Petrucci, 2017; Harris, 2010;
Whitten, 2014).
4. What are the possible sources of errors and their effect on the calculated parameters?
Rationalize.
Incorrect standardization would have skewed the value of HCl molarity used in
calculations. Numerous personal errors also could have affected the experiment: titration is one,
wherein overtitration of the analyte would affect the accuracy of the calculated concentration, or
not cleaning or drying the buret well enough beforehand would have resulted in final volumes both
imprecise and inaccurate. Moreover, errors in weighing affect the experiment from titration to
final calculation, and improper solute transfer either adds impurities to the analyte or decreases
its amount. Parallax errors, wherein the volume reading is inaccurate if not read at eye level of the
liquid surface, could also have been committed during titration, affecting the final volume reading
of the titrant (Skoog, 2013).
REFERENCES
Harris, D. C. (2010). Quantitative chemical analysis. Macmillan.
Harvey, D. (2000). Modern analytical chemistry. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Bissonnette, C., & Madura, J. D. (2017). General chemistry: principles and
modern applications. Pearson.
Skoog, D. A., West, D. M., Holler, F. J., & Crouch, S. (2013). Fundamentals of analytical chemistry. Nelson
Education.
Whitten, K. W., Davis, R. E., Peck, M. L., & Stanley, G. (2014). Chemistry. Cengage Learning.