Compass AR 2014 LR
Compass AR 2014 LR
Compass AR 2014 LR
OPPORTUNITIES
FOR GROWTH
Annual Report 2014
COMPASS GROUP PLC PROVIDES
GREAT FOOD AND SUPPORT SERVICES
TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AROUND
THE WORLD EVERY DAY. OUR CORE
STRATEGY IS UNCHANGED AND
CONTINUES TO DELIVER. WE REMAIN
POSITIVE ABOUT THE STRUCTURAL
GROWTH POTENTIAL IN FOOD AND
SUPPORT SERVICES GLOBALLY.
Strategic report
6 Sectors and services
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
8 Our regions
78 Directors’ responsibilities
10 Chief Executive’s statement
79 Independent auditor’s report
12 Market perspective
81 Consolidated financial statements
14 Business model
92 Notes to the consolidated financial
16 Strategy for growth statements
18 Key performance indicators
20 Regional reviews PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Corporate governance
46 Our Board
50+
500,000+
Parent Company financial statements
We employ more than 500,000 great people
REVENUE UNDERLYING OPERATING UNDERLYING BASIC UNDERLYING OPERATING REPORTED PROFIT DIVIDEND PER ORDINARY
(£M) MARGIN EARNINGS PER SHARE PROFIT BEFORE TAX SHARE
(%) (PENCE) (£M) (£M) (PENCE)
1,147
17,557
16,905
17,058
26.5
1,265
1,245
48.7
24.0
47.7
1,178
789
7.2
42.6
6.9
21.3
7.1
721
Shareholder information
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014
28
POSITION IN FTSE 100 INDEX AS OUR VALUES
AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014 (2013: 30) OPENNESS, TRUST
AND INTEGRITY
PASSION FOR
QUALITY
WIN THROUGH
TEAMWORK
COMPASS SHARE COMPASS GROUP SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE V THE FTSE 100 INDEX
PRICE PERFORMANCE (PENCE) CAN DO SAFELY
V FTSE 100
OVER LAST 3 YEARS
FTSE (REBASED)
RESPONSIBILITY
(%)
61.20
COMPASS
2013 2014
1,100
1,050
29.70
1,000
14.10
950
900
850
800
1 YEAR 2 YEARS 3 YEARS S O N D J F M A M J J A S
Strategic report
I am very pleased to report, in my first statement as Chairman, that with constant currency earnings. This year, the Board is proposing
Compass has had another successful year with growth in constant a final dividend of 17.7 pence for payment on 23 February 2015.
currency revenue and operating profit. Cash flow has remained strong, This brings our total dividend for 2014 to 26.5 pence, a year on year
continuing to underpin our commitment to shareholder value and increase of 10.5%.
enabling us to make a significant return of cash to shareholders during
As well as our commitment to a progressive dividend policy,
the year.
the ongoing strength of our business and our cash flows, and our
We have continued to deliver a strong performance in North America confidence in our future performance, mean we have been able
Corporate governance
and in the Fast Growing & Emerging region, where emerging markets to make a Return of Cash of £1 billion to shareholders accompanied
are growing at a double digit rate. The culture of outsourcing is strong by a Share Consolidation. This was completed in July of this year.
in all our regions, but we are seeing particularly robust growth in The £500 million share buyback programme announced in
North America, where the already strong trend is accelerating, and November 2013 is ongoing and is expected to complete during 2015.
a structural shift to outsourcing in the emerging economies. Economic
conditions in Europe & Japan have somewhat improved over the year LEADERSHIP
and the investments we have made in the sales and retention teams During the year, Carol Arrowsmith joined the Board as a non-executive
are being reflected in an encouraging pipeline. director. Carol was appointed Chairman of the Remuneration
Our Management and Performance (MAP) framework continues to Committee, succeeding Sir Ian Robinson who stepped down from the
have a significant impact on driving growth and margin across the role in June. Sir Ian remains the Group’s Senior Independent Non-
business. The focus on efficiencies within the MAP framework is Executive Director. Carol is also a member of the Audit, Nomination
and Corporate Responsibility Committees. Carol was previously a
6 8
1. NORTH AMERICA .........................48%
2. EUROPE & JAPAN......................... 34%
3. FAST GROWING & EMERGING...... 18%
32
> £17bn
WHAT IS OUR BUSINESS MODEL? WHAT IS OUR STRATEGY
FOR GROWTH?
We deliver sustainable value and Our principal aim is to
competitive advantage by: grow organically and
efficiently, focusing on
food and developing a
ORGANIC REVENUE GROWTH
targeted support services
offer across our wide
geographic base.
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES
14 16
48.7
47.7
driver and we see exciting which we believe best reflect
42.6
opportunities across all the our strategic priorities.
sectors in which we operate.
37 40
Strategic report
Framework enables us to deliver a range of Live – helps us to educate young people about and mining and construction industries,
support services to the highest standard, at the how to have a happy, safe and healthy lifestyle operating in some of the most demanding
best value, on an international scale. while contributing to a sustainable world. environments in the world. For our defence
sector clients, we are a partner who
meets the challenges of running efficient
operations outside areas of conflict.
Corporate governance
We are specialists in helping hospitals in Operating at some of the world’s most
the public and private sectors on their journey prestigious sporting and leisure venues,
of managing efficiency and enhancing quality exhibition centres, visitor attractions and
across a range of services. With a significant major events, we have an enviable reputation
presence in the growing senior living market, for providing outstanding hospitality and
we also provide services to residential homes true service excellence.
and home meal delivery services.
£8,199m
REVENUE
(2013: £8,150M)
North America is the core growth engine for the Group.
We have a market leading business there, which delivers
excellent levels of growth and steady margin expansion.
Having first established the business in 1994, we are now
the 11th largest private sector employer in the USA and
48%
% OF GROUP
Corporate governance
serve around six million meals a day. REVENUE
(2013: 47%)
£666m
UNDERLYING
OPERATING PROFIT
(2013: £657M)
£5,716m
REVENUE
(2013: £6,039M)
Despite difficult economic conditions in Europe, our teams
there are doing an excellent job in mitigating the impact
and we see good medium term growth opportunities across
the region. We continue to see steady progress in our
business in Japan.
34%
% OF GROUP
REVENUE
(2013: 34%)
Find out more on page 24
£409m
UNDERLYING
£3,143m
REVENUE
(2013: £3,368M)
The Fast Growing & Emerging region offers excellent
growth potential and is likely to become a larger part
of the Group as we expand our presence in these markets.
Revenue has doubled and profits quadrupled since 2006
and we are making significant investment in management
18%
% OF GROUP
and infrastructure to support our growth. REVENUE
(2013: 19%)
Shareholder information
£226m
UNDERLYING
OPERATING PROFIT
(2013: £242M)
STRATEGY
FOCUS ON FOOD
Food remains our core business. The structural opportunity in the
outsourced food service market, estimated at more than £200 billion,
is a key growth driver. With only around 50% of the market currently
outsourced, it represents a significant opportunity. We believe the
benefits of outsourcing will become ever more apparent as economic
conditions and regulatory changes put increasing pressure on
organisations’ budgets. As one of the largest providers in all of our
sectors, we are well placed to benefit from these trends.
Corporate governance
Our geographic strategy remains unchanged. Over the last ten years USES OF CASH AND BALANCE SHEET PRIORITIES
the Group has evolved significantly from a predominantly European The Group’s cash flow generation remains strong and it will continue
based business with just over £11 billion of revenue to the £17 billion to be a key part of the business model. Going forward, our priorities
global business today. During this time we have halved the number for how we use our cash are the same: (i) we will continue to invest
of countries in which we operate. in capital expenditure to support organic growth where we see good
returns; (ii) we remain committed to growing the dividend broadly
We expect North America (48% of Group revenue) to remain the
in line with constant currency earnings; (iii) we look to make small to
principal growth engine for the Group. We have a market leading
medium sized infill acquisitions. After making these investments, we
business with excellent management teams delivering high levels of
will maintain an efficient balance sheet through returns to shareholders
growth and steady margin expansion. The outsourcing culture is
whilst continuing to target strong investment grade credit ratings.
vibrant and the addressable market is significant.
2
SERVICE
>£400bn
Numbers relating to market size and penetration
rates are based on management estimates and
a range of external data
OUR
PEOPLE
Corporate governance
OPE
OWTH RA
EFF
ORGANIC REVE
ICIEN
SHAREHOLDER
CIES
VALUE
CO
M PE TA GE
T I T I V E A DVA N
participation and spend in our has become an embedded part of our The increase in organic revenue
restaurants. As the trend to outsourcing culture. As well as delivering good growth and efficiencies means we can
accelerates around the world, we see levels of margin improvement, it invest in the business to support future
exciting opportunities for growth enables us to reinvest in the exciting performance, therefore completing the
in all our regions and sectors. growth opportunities around virtuous circle.
the Group.
PROOF POINTS
We estimate that the global
food service market is around
£200 billion, around 80%
of which is either self operated
or in the hands of small
regional providers, presenting
a significant structural growth
opportunity (see page 12).
MAP 1: CLIENT SALES AND MARKETING MAP 2: CONSUMER SALES AND MARKETING
We have increased our investment in sales and retention teams A contributor to organic revenue growth is like for like volume
across our geographies. In North America we have delivered which is heavily influenced by the number of people at a
exceptionally strong net new business and in the emerging markets client’s site. This reflects macroeconomic conditions and, in
we have been able to harness the structural shift to outsourcing, particular, employment levels. Whilst we continue to see economic
growing significantly against a backdrop of tough economic conditions in some of our markets impact volumes, we are making
conditions. In Europe & Japan we are driving an improved organic good progress with intelligent marketing programmes and training
performance through this increased MAP 1 focus with a pipeline schemes as we work hard to attract and satisfy our customer base
of new business which gives us increased confidence in the future. with strong consumer propositions.
Corporate governance
SERVICES FAST GROWING AND SUPPLEMENTED BY FOR EFFICIENCIES
EMERGING MARKETS INFILL ACQUISITIONS
We also provide a range of Our international presence The main engine of growth is We generate savings through
soft support services such as in over 50 countries gives organic and we are investing in adopting a systematic approach
cleaning, reception and some us a good geographical mix the business to capture future to our supply chain and better
building maintenance. Our and diversifies our revenue growth opportunities. Organic managing our labour and
strategy differs by country sources. It allows us to serve revenue is supplemented with above unit overheads. These
and by sector where attitudes multinational businesses, small to medium sized infill efficiencies enable us to grow
to support services vary ensuring consistency of quality, acquisitions in food or support the margin and to reinvest
significantly. We are therefore service and standards across services where they add either in the significant growth
MAP 3: COST OF FOOD MAP 4: IN UNIT COSTS MAP 5: ABOVE UNIT OVERHEADS
Food makes up around one third of In unit costs are made up predominantly Having reduced costs considerably
our costs. In addition to the benefits of labour. We focus on getting the right when MAP was first introduced by
of our purchasing scale, we are able to people in the right place at the right time. creating a simpler organisational model
Shareholder information
manage the cost of food by careful menu By using labour scheduling techniques with fewer layers of management and less
management and through rationalising and improving productivity, we are able bureaucracy, we now strive to leverage
the number of products we buy and the to deliver the right level of service in the those gains by maintaining costs at a
suppliers we buy from. most efficient way. constant level whilst still growing revenue.
priorities of growth, efficiency business and maintain appropriate pricing levels in light of input
cost inflation. The operating profit margin is an important measure
and shareholder returns of the efficiency of our operations in delivering great food and support
services to our clients and consumers.
underpinned by safe and
responsible working practices.
7.2
6.9
7.1
4.3
4.1
18.2
760
from underlying free cash flow. income tax at the underlying rate of the
741
Corporate governance
measure greenhouse gas emissions to assess our progress.
7.3
7.2
6.3
GROUP REVENUE
48%
REVENUE BY SECTOR
5
4 1
3
1. BUSINESS & INDUSTRY .........................29%
2. HEALTHCARE & SENIORS.......................29%
3. EDUCATION.............................................24% 2
4. DEFENCE, OFFSHORE & REMOTE ............3%
5. SPORTS & LEISURE ................................15%
REVENUE ORGANIC REVENUE GROWTH UNDERLYING OPERATING PROFIT UNDERLYING OPERATING MARGIN
Corporate governance
wins and excellent retention rates. Like for like
volume has remained broadly flat.
Operating profit increased by £49 million on a constant currency Good organic revenue growth in the Education sector was driven by
basis to £666 million (2013: £617 million). Continued progress on increased participation and strong new business wins, including food
Strategic report
The outsourcing culture in
Corporate governance
North America is vibrant and
we have market leading positions
across all sectors.
North America remains our core growth We have an excellent pipeline of contracts The growth of the business is underpinned
engine. Revenue has grown from $6 billion across all sectors. Importantly, our largest by the successful sales and retention processes
6m
e serve six million meals
W
a day across the US
GROUP REVENUE
34%
REVENUE BY SECTOR
5
4
3
1
1. BUSINESS & INDUSTRY .........................55%
2. HEALTHCARE & SENIORS.......................16% 2
3. EDUCATION.............................................12%
4. DEFENCE, OFFSHORE & REMOTE ............7%
5. SPORTS & LEISURE ................................10%
REVENUE ORGANIC REVENUE GROWTH UNDERLYING OPERATING PROFIT UNDERLYING OPERATING MARGIN
Corporate governance
Japan totalled £5.7 billion (2013: £6.0 billion),
an organic decline of 1.5%, half the rate of
the previous year.
The investment in, and focus on, MAP 1 sales and retention processes The rate of like for like volume decline has slowed compared to 2013
are starting to deliver, with good levels of new business seen in the and the decline in organic revenue is now around half the level seen last
he fundamentals of our
T
Shareholder information
Strategic report
DELIVERY
Corporate governance
is large and underpenetrated. The ongoing
need for organisations to reduce their costs
underpins the outsourcing proposition.
The fundamentals of our businesses in The ongoing need for organisations to take
Europe & Japan are good. Lower costs, an out costs is a keystone of the outsourcing
Shareholder information
<50%
Proportion of food service market currently
outsourced
GROUP REVENUE
18%
REVENUE BY SECTOR
5
1
4
1. BUSINESS & INDUSTRY .........................40%
2. HEALTHCARE & SENIORS.........................8%
3. EDUCATION...............................................5% 2
3
4. DEFENCE, OFFSHORE & REMOTE ..........45%
5. SPORTS & LEISURE ..................................2%
REVENUE ORGANIC REVENUE GROWTH UNDERLYING OPERATING PROFIT UNDERLYING OPERATING MARGIN
Corporate governance
by the slowdown in the Australian offshore and remote
sector. Therefore, the region as a whole delivered
organic revenue growth of 8.1% with revenue of
£3.1 billion (2013: £3.4 billion).
Overall, operating profit increased by £16 million on a constant Strong organic revenue growth in Turkey was driven by new business
currency basis to £226 million (2013: £210 million). As a result wins and like for like revenue growth. New contracts include the food
HIGH STANDARDS
a significant increase in their working
Strategic report
important to our clients and is critical to the
populations, income per capita and
wellbeing of our colleagues and consumers.
discretionary spend. Our exposure to these
IN DEMANDING
We operate a global Health, Safety and
markets has almost trebled over the last
Environmental (HSE) Management System
decade and they now represent 18% of Group
supported by policies, standards and metrics.
ENVIRONMENTS
revenue. We have a strong presence in key
This system underpins consistent operating
markets such as Brazil and Turkey, and
standards across all of the diverse markets
we are growing rapidly in India and China.
in which we operate. The Corporate
With over 70% of the market currently Responsibility Committee of the Board
estimated to be self operated, the structural reviews the HSE policies annually, supported
Health and safety dynamics are attractive and we’re seeing an by our global HSE forum, which brings
Corporate governance
operational priority of growth maintained well into the future. In
order to maximise these opportunities, we’re
The forum is responsible for defining policies,
setting standards, measuring compliance
and a clear differentiator investing in management and systems with
a clear focus on quality, sustainable growth.
and sharing best practice. As a result of our
for our business. dedicated focus on health and safety, our
global Lost Time Injury Rate has improved
by 51% compared to the 2008 baseline.
31%
Shareholder information
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Increase/
2014 2013 (Decrease)
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Revenue
Constant currency £17,058m £16,380m 4.1%
Reported £17,058m £17,557m (2.8)%
Organic growth 4.1% 4.3%
Total operating profit
Constant currency £1,245m £1,176m 5.9%
Underlying £1,245m £1,265m (1.6)%
Reported £1,217m £802m 51.7%
Operating margin
Constant currency 7.2% 7.1% +10bps
Underlying 7.2% 7.1% +10bps
Reported 7.1% 4.5% +260bps
Profit before tax
Underlying £1,159m £1,188m (2.4)%
Reported £1,147m £721m 59.1%
Basic earnings per share
Constant currency 48.7p 44.1p 10.5%
Underlying 48.7p 47.7p 2.1%
Reported 48.8p 23.3p 109.4%
Free cash flow
Constant currency £741m £767m (3.4)%
Underlying £741m £834m (11.1)%
Reported £683m £762m (10.4)%
TOTAL GROUP INCLUDING
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Basic earnings per share 49.0p 23.5p 108.5%
Full year dividend per ordinary share 26.5p 24.0p 10.5%
SEGMENTAL PERFORMANCE
2014 has been another year of Revenue
2014 2013
Revenue growth
Constant
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
North America 666 657 8.1% 8.1%
Europe & Japan 409 420 7.2% 7.0%
Fast Growing & Emerging 226 242 7.2% 7.2%
Unallocated overheads (65) (64) – –
Excluding associates 1,236 1,255 7.2% 7.1%
Associates 9 10
Underlying 1,245 1,265
Amortisation of intangibles arising
on acquisitions (25) (25)
Acquisition transaction costs (3) (3)
Adjustment to contingent
consideration on acquisition – 1
European exceptional – (59)
Goodwill impairment – (377)
Total 1,217 802
Corporate governance
Profit before tax from continuing operations was £1,147 million
OPERATING PROFIT (2013: £721 million). On an underlying basis, profit before tax
Underlying operating profit from continuing operations was from continuing operations decreased by 2.4% to £1,159 million
£1,245 million (2013: £1,265 million), a decrease of 1.6%. (2013: £1,188 million).
The impact of currency movements on the results for the year has
been significant. If we restate 2013’s result at the 2014 average INCOME TAX EXPENSE
exchange rates for the year, revenue would reduce by £1,177 million Income tax expense from continuing operations was £279 million
or 6.7% and underlying operating profit would reduce by £89 million, (2013: £287 million).
or 7.0%. On an underlying basis, the tax charge on continuing operations was
On a constant currency basis, underlying operating profit has therefore £293 million (2013: £309 million), equivalent to an effective tax rate
increased by £69 million, an increase of 5.9%. A total of £65 million of 25% (2013: 26%). We expect the tax rate to continue to average out
1 Constant currency restates the prior year results to 2014’s average exchange rates. 7 Underlying basic earnings per share excludes European exceptional cost, goodwill
2 Total operating profit includes share of profit of associates. impairment, profit on disposal of US businesses, profit on disposal of interest in
3 Underlying operating profit and margin excludes European exceptional cost, associates, amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition, acquisition
Shareholder information
goodwill impairment, amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition, acquisition transaction costs, adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition, hedge
transaction costs and adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition. accounting ineffectiveness, change in the fair value of investments, the tax
4 Operating margin is based on revenue and operating profit excluding share of profit attributable to these and the exceptional recognition of tax losses in prior years.
of associates. 8 Underlying cash flow adjusts for the £58 million of European exceptional cash costs
5 Underlying net finance cost excludes hedge accounting ineffectiveness and the (2013: £72 million of European exceptional cash costs).
change in the fair value of investments and non-controlling interest put options. 9 Organic revenue growth is calculated by adjusting for acquisitions (excluding current
6 Underlying profit before tax excludes European exceptional cost, goodwill year acquisitions and including a full year in respect of prior year acquisitions),
impairment, profit on disposal of US businesses, profit on disposal of interest disposals (excluded from both periods) and exchange rate movements (translating
in associates, amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition, acquisition the prior year at current year exchange rates) and compares the current year results
transaction costs, adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition, against the prior year.
hedge accounting ineffectiveness and change in the fair value of investments.
Corporate governance
as at 30 September 2014 was 14% (2013: 8%). currency risks arising from the Group’s operations. The Group does
not trade in financial instruments. The Group’s treasury policies are
At the end of the year, net debt was £2,331 million (2013: £1,193 million). designed to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and
exchange rates and to manage the Group’s financial risks. The Board
LIQUIDITY RISK approves any changes to the policies.
The Group finances its borrowings from a number of sources including
the bank, the public and the private placement markets. The Group FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
has developed long term relationships with a number of financial The Group’s policy is to match as far as possible its principal projected
counterparties with the balance sheet strength and credit quality cash flows by currency to actual or effective borrowings in the same
to provide credit facilities as required. The Group seeks to avoid currency. As currency cash flows are generated, they are used to
a concentration of debt maturities in any one period to spread its service and repay debt in the same currency. Where necessary, to
refinancing risk. The maturity profile of the Group’s principal implement this policy, forward currency contracts and cross currency
FINANCING – MATURITY PROFILE OF PRINCIPAL BORROWINGS The borrowings in each currency can give rise to foreign exchange
AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014 (£M) differences on translation into sterling. Where the borrowings are
2015 either less than, or equate to, the net investment in overseas operations,
these exchange rate movements are treated as movements on reserves
2016
and recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income
2017
rather than in the income statement.
2018
Non-sterling earnings streams are translated at the average rate of
2019
exchange for the year. Fluctuations in exchange rates have given and
2020
will continue to give rise to translation differences. The Group is only
2021 partially protected from the impact of such differences through the
Strategic report
The Board continues to take a proactive approach to recognising
and mitigating risk with the aim of protecting its employees and
consumers and safeguarding the interests of the Company and its
shareholders in the constantly changing environment in which
Corporate governance
it operates.
As set out in the Corporate Governance section on pages 48 to 76, The Group faces a number of operational risks on an ongoing
the Group has policies and procedures in place to ensure that risks are basis such as litigation and financial (including liquidity and credit)
Shareholder information
BIDDING Each year, the Group could bid for a large number A rigorous tender review process is in place, which includes
of opportunities. a critical assessment of contracts to identify potential risks
(including social and ethical risks) and rewards, prior to
approval at an appropriate level in the organisation.
SERVICE DELIVERY The Group’s operating companies contract with a large Processes are in place to ensure that the services delivered
AND CONTRACTUAL number of clients. Failure to comply with the terms of to clients are of an appropriate standard and comply with the
COMPLIANCE these contracts, including proper delivery of services, required contract terms and conditions.
could lead to loss of business.
COMPETITION We operate in a competitive marketplace. The level We aim to minimise this by continuing to promote our
of concentration and outsource penetration varies by differentiated propositions and focusing on our points of
country and by sector. Some markets are relatively strength, such as flexibility in our cost base, quality and
concentrated with two or three key players. Others are value of service and innovation.
highly fragmented and offer significant opportunities
for consolidation and penetration of the self-operated
market. Aggressive pricing from our competitors could
cause a reduction in our revenues and margins.
PEOPLE
RISK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLES OF MITIGATION
RECRUITMENT Failure to attract and recruit people with the right The Group aims to mitigate this risk by efficient, time critical
skills at all levels could limit the success of the Group. resource management, mobilisation of existing, experienced
The Group faces resourcing challenges in some of its employees within the organisation and through offering
businesses due to a lack of industry experience amongst training and development programmes.
candidates and appropriately qualified people, and the
seasonal nature of some of our business.
RETENTION AND Retaining and motivating the best people with the right The Group has established training, development,
MOTIVATION skills, at all levels of the organisation, is key to the long performance management and reward programmes to retain,
term success of the Group. develop and motivate our best people.
The Group has a well established employee engagement
initiative, Your Voice, which helps us to monitor, understand
and respond to our employees’ needs.
Corporate governance
COST INFLATION Our objective is always to deliver the right level of As part of our MAP framework, we seek to manage inflation
service in the most efficient way. An increase in the through continuing to drive greater efficiencies through menu
cost of labour or food could constitute a risk to our management, supplier rationalisation, labour scheduling and
ability to do this. productivity. Cost indexation in our contracts also gives us
the contractual right to review pricing with our clients.
POLITICAL STABILITY We are a global business operating in countries and The Group remains vigilant to future changes presented by
regions with diverse economic and political conditions. emerging markets or fledgling administrations and we try
Our operations and earnings may be adversely affected to anticipate and contribute to important changes in
by political or economic instability. public policy.
Strategic report
The Group’s strategy and our corporate responsibility (CR) approach
are well aligned as we improve the business operating model to reflect
more sustainable practices. CR is a keystone of our commitment to
provide the highest quality service to our customers. Within CR, the
Corporate governance
safety of our colleagues and consumers is our number one operational
priority. Our Safety First programme is built on one powerful idea:
everyone in our business takes ownership for safety – every day.
During the year, we revisited our CR strategy with our stakeholders continues to underpin our long term success as a business.
to ensure that we continue to address those business impacts that are Our approach is simple; to create alignment, understanding
important to them. These insights help us to better understand and commitment in all our markets around four areas that are
emerging issues and progressively refine our CR strategy so it fundamental to our success.
PROGRESS
Overall, we have made good progress against our CR commitments, products. Our success as a business is dependent on us having a well
including greater visibility of performance data which is helping us to trained, motivated workforce and, in response to stakeholder feedback,
better assess our business impacts, control our non-financial risks and we have further developed our approach to measuring and reporting
make more informed decisions. our people focused indicators: employment opportunities, engagement,
diversity and human rights.
Increasingly, our customers are seeking assurances that the products
they consume come from safe, ethical and sustainable sources. Working For a summary of our achievements, please go to pages 42 to 45 or
with colleagues from around the world, we have further developed our for a more detailed review of our performance visit our CR site at
global Supply Chain Standards to include improved controls, designed www.compass-group.com/cr14.
to protect the integrity of our supply chain and the provenance of
Shareholder information
INCREASE IN HEALTHY EATING OPTIONS EMPLOYEES SURVEYED WHO BELIEVE THE IMPROVEMENT IN OUR LOST TIME INJURY GHG INTENSITY IN 2014
OFFERED TO CONSUMERS (SINCE 2011) COMPANY IS A GOOD CORPORATE CITIZEN RATE PERFORMANCE (SINCE 2008) (GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS)
2013–2014
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2013–2014 TARGET PERFORMANCE
INNOVATE WELLBEING2 The number of units providing Balanced Choices (or Report % improvement
equivalent healthy eating programmes) to their
consumers
% of units offering nutritional advice to consumers Report % of units
% of countries operating a sugar, salt and fat Report % of countries
reduction programme
SOURCE SUPPLY CHAIN % of countries adopting our global Supply Chain 100% implementation
Standards by 2015
INTEGRITY1, 2 % of countries with programmes in place to support: Report % of countries
• sustainable fish/seafood
• Fairtrade and ethically sourced products
• locally sourced products
PREPARE ENERGY Reduction in total Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions 20% reduction by 2017
The health and wellbeing of our consumers is important to us. We provide guidance and advice to help them make 100% of units providing Balanced
informed choices about how to achieve a healthier lifestyle. Choices or similar healthy eating
programmes to their consumers
We are the only food service company to have signed up to all seven of the food service pledges of the UK
by 2015
Government’s Responsibility Deal, and we take an active role in the Responsibility Deal Plenary Group.
Corporate governance
We have also implemented improved consumer signposting on allergens, ahead of the new EU Regulations effective
December 2014.
We have refreshed our global Supply Chain Standards to provide greater emphasis on supplier assurance and product 100% implementation by 2015
traceability. The new standards are being progressively rolled out across all markets.
Increasingly, our customers are seeking assurances that the products they consume are sourced ethically and Report % of countries with
sustainably. In 2014, we collated and analysed data from countries to form our baseline and we will report on our programmes in place to support:
progress in 2015.
• sustainable fish/seafood
• Fairtrade and ethically sourced
products
• locally sourced products
This year, we collated and analysed data from countries to form our baseline against this KPI. We will report on our Report % of expenditure on tea,
progress in 2015. coffee, sugar and bananas from
ethical or Fairtrade sources
The trend across our operations is positive and we continue to show improvements in intensity being achieved against 20% reduction by 2017 (against
the 2008 baseline ratio of 7.8. 2008 baseline)
We have calculated our Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions since 2008 and this year, we further enhanced our environmental Report total direct GHG emissions
reporting by implementing a new web-based system which supports greater transparency and accuracy of data. – metric tonnes
GHG emissions have been calculated in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting
Standard (revised edition), together with the latest emission factors from recognised public sources including, but not
GHG intensity has increased by 17% since 2012-2013, as a result of improved reporting of our carbon emissions
data. Checking of our historical data identified minor errors in the 2012 and 2013 emissions data for the US and UK
businesses. The corrected absolute emissions and intensity figures are reflected in the data reported above.
The reporting of GHG emissions covered 93% of consolidated Group revenue and we are seeking continuous
improvement in data entry and completeness in future years.
140 9.0
8.5
120
8.0
(tCO²e/£M REVENUE)
Shareholder information
100 7.5
GHG EMISSIONS
GHG INTENSITY
(tCO²e)(000’S)
80 7.0
6.5
60 6.0
40 5.5
5.0
20 ORIGINAL SCOPE
4.5 ADDITIONAL SCOPE
0 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 4.0 EMISSIONS INTENSITY
2013–2014
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2013–2014 TARGET PERFORMANCE
EFFICIENCY2
WASTE % of units where cooking oil is recovered/recycled Report % of units where cooking
REPORTING2 oil is recovered/recycled
PROVIDE FOOD SAFETY1 Global Food Safety Incident Rate (FSIR) Report % improvement
HEALTH AND
SAFETY1
% of employees surveyed in our global Your Voice n/a n/a
survey who believe the Company places
a high priority on health and safety
EMPLOYEE Employee retention rate for all employees: Report % improvement of:
Strategic report
performance statistics on our CR website at
www.compass-group.com/cr14
We are making good progress in reducing our water consumption and continue to invest in water efficiency equipment 20% reduction by 2017 (against
and practices. In addition, we continue to employ web-based training programmes to improve the environmental 2008 baseline)
awareness of our colleagues around the world. We have deployed a new reporting system which provides greater
functionality to enable countries to extend their scope of reporting. Looking forward, this will include additional
locations where Compass has direct control, such as laundries and central production units.
Corporate governance
This year, we collated and analysed data from countries to form our baseline against this KPI. We will report on our 25% increase in spend on
progress in 2015. concentrated chemicals as a %
of total chemical spend by 2015
In 2014, we focused on improving the accuracy of data reported by countries, including the composition of our waste 25% improvement by 2017
by collaborating with our waste contractors. This enables us to track progress on the proportion of waste being recycled. (against 2011 baseline)
This year, we collated and analysed data from countries to form our baseline against this KPI. We will report on our Report % of units where cooking
progress in 2015. oil is recovered/recycled
This year, we extended the implementation of our food waste reduction programmes from our top 20 to our top 100% implementation of food
30 countries. waste reduction programmes across
our top 30 countries by 2015
We achieved further improvement in our global Lost Time Injury Rate, with a reduction of 51% in the number of Report % improvement (against
incidents compared to the 2008 baseline. Our ongoing commitment to implement programmes to improve safety 2008 baseline)
leadership and culture underpins this success. This year, we introduced our Safety First portal, which enables
countries to share and implement best practice initiatives more easily, to support employee engagement in the
reduction of incidents.
We are pleased that so many of our employees (80% of employees surveyed in 2013) believe that health and safety Report % improvement (against
is our number one operational priority (2011: 79%). The next survey takes place in 2015. 2013 survey)
Sadly, we had two work related employee fatalities as a result of motor vehicle accidents.
This year, we achieved an employee retention rate of 83% (2013: 82%). Report % improvement (against
23% of our global leadership team positions are held by women (22% in 2013). Report % increase
In accordance with the Companies Act 2006, you will find more information on employee diversity on page 58. Report % of female representation
in the global workforce
We are pleased that so many of our employees (76% of employees surveyed in 2013) believe that the Company Report % improvement (against
embraces diversity. The next survey takes place in 2015. 2013 survey)
All our countries have access to the independently operated Speak Up whistleblowing programme, which enables Measure and report concerns with
employees to report material concerns for review and follow up. There is a clear escalation process in place to consider 100% follow up
each concern raised. Where appropriate, a full investigation and remedial actions are taken.
Shareholder information
We conduct a global Your Voice employee survey every two years – the next survey will take place in 2015. Report % participation rate
Report % engagement rate
of Scottish Power plc. He is a former non-executive Pension Plan and the Compass Retirement Income
director of ASDA plc, RMC plc, Scottish & Newcastle Savings Plan. He was previously Group Company
plc and Siemens Holdings plc. Secretary and General Counsel of Wolseley plc COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
and Company Secretary of Enterprise Oil plc and ● Audit
CURRENT EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS Rotork plc.
Member of the Takeover Panel and Fellow of the Corporate Responsibility
Royal Academy of Engineers. CURRENT EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS ■ Disclosure
Member of the Upper Tribunal, Tax and Executive Board
Chancery Chamber. General Business
Nomination
◆ Remuneration
c
Denotes Chairman
s
Denotes Secretary
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
49 Governance and Directors’ Report
59 Directors’ Remuneration Report
Strategic report
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT The Chairman, Paul Walsh, joined the Board as an independent
The directors present their Annual Report and the audited consolidated non-executive director on 1 January 2014 and succeeded Sir Roy Gardner
accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries for the year ended who retired as Chairman at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting
30 September 2014. This Corporate Governance Report and other statutory (AGM) held on 6 February 2014. Carol Arrowsmith joined the Board as an
disclosures set out on pages 49 to 58 make up the Directors’ Report. independent non-executive director on 1 June 2014.
This Directors’ Report also contains information required to be disclosed All of the non-executive directors are considered by the Board to be
under the UK Listing Authority’s Listing Rules and under the Disclosure independent of management and free of any relationship which could
and Transparency Rules. To the extent necessary, certain information is materially interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement.
incorporated into this Report by reference. The Board considers that each of the non-executive directors brings their
own senior level of experience, gained in each of their own fields, mainly
in international operations.
UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE COMPLIANCE
Corporate governance
Responsibility for good governance lies with the Board. The Board is Biographical details of the directors currently in office are shown on
accountable to shareholders and is committed to the highest standards pages 46 and 47. The Company’s policy relating to the terms of
of corporate governance as set out in the UK Corporate Governance appointment and the remuneration of both executive and non-executive
Code 2010 and 2012 (the Code). The Code can be found on the Financial directors is detailed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report which is on
Reporting Council (FRC) website at www.frc.org.uk. This Corporate pages 59 to 76.
Governance Report, together with the Directors’ Remuneration Report
The Board meets regularly during the year as well as on an ad hoc basis,
set out on pages 59 to 76, describes how the Board has applied the
as required by business need. The Board met eight times during the year
main principles of good governance set out in the Code during the year
and director attendance for each meeting is shown in the table on page 51.
under review.
Each director also attends the AGM to answer shareholder questions.
The FRC published a revised Code on 17 September 2014, applicable
to financial reporting periods beginning on or after 1 October 2014. Where RESPONSIBILITIES
BUSINESS
COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE dishonestly. The Company has also arranged appropriate insurance cover
BOARD
in respect of legal action against its directors and officers.
The roles of Chairman and Group Chief Executive are separate and
THE BOARD clearly defined, with the division of responsibilities set out in writing and
agreed by the Board.
COMPOSITION
As at 30 September 2014, and as at the date of this Report, the board
of directors was made up of 10 members, comprising the non-executive
Chairman, four executive directors and five non-executive directors.
DIRECTOR EFFECTIVENESS AND TRAINING that, following the appointment of Paul Walsh as Chairman, a revised
In accordance with best practice, the Chairman addresses the approach towards long term succession at Board level was being adopted.
developmental needs of the Board as a whole, with a view to further This has initially seen the appointment of Carol Arrowsmith as both an
developing its effectiveness as a team, and ensures that each director independent non-executive director and Chairman of the Remuneration
refreshes and updates his or her individual skills, knowledge Committee on 1 June 2014.
and expertise.
It was also the view of the Board that each of the non-executive directors
Meetings between the non-executive directors, both with and without brings considerable management expertise and an independent perspective
the presence of the Group Chief Executive, are scheduled in the Board’s to the Board’s deliberations and they are considered to be independent of
annual programme. Board meetings are also held at Group business management and free from any relationship or circumstance that could
locations to help all Board members to gain a deeper understanding of the affect, or appear to affect, the exercise of their independent judgement.
business. This also provides senior managers from across the Group with Overall, the Board considered the performance of each director to be
the opportunity to present to the Board as well as to meet the directors effective and concluded that both the Board and its committees continue
on more informal occasions. to provide effective leadership and exert the required levels of governance
and control. The Board will continue to review its procedures, effectiveness
Succession planning is a matter for the whole Board, rather than for a
and development in the year ahead.
committee. The Company’s Articles of Association provide that one third
of the directors retire by rotation each year and that each director will seek
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
re-election at the AGM every three years. However, in accordance with
As part of their ongoing development, the executive directors may seek
the Code, all directors submit themselves for annual re-election by
one external non-executive role on a non-competitor board, for which
shareholders. New directors may be appointed by the Board, but are
subject to election by shareholders at the first opportunity after their they may retain the remuneration in respect of the appointment. In
appointment, as is the case with Carol Arrowsmith who will seek election order to avoid any conflict of interest, all appointments are subject to
at the AGM on 5 February 2015. The Articles of Association limit the the Board’s approval and the Board monitors the extent of directors’
number of directors to not less than two and not more than 20 save where other interests to ensure that its effectiveness is not compromised.
shareholders decide otherwise. Non-executive directors are normally Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006)
appointed for an initial term of three years which is reviewed and may be to avoid a situation in which he or she has or can have a direct or
extended for a further three years. It is Board policy that non-executive indirect interest that conflicts or possibly may conflict with the interests
director appointments should last for no more than nine years.
of the Company. This duty is in addition to the obligation that he or
A formal, comprehensive and tailored induction is given to all she owes to the Company to disclose to the Board any transaction or
non-executive directors following their appointment, including visits arrangement under consideration by the Company. The Company’s
to key locations within the Group and meetings with members of the Articles of Association authorise the directors to approve such
Executive Board and other key senior executives. The induction also situations and to include other provisions to allow conflicts of interest
covers a review of the Group’s governance policies, structures and business, to be dealt with. The Board follows an established procedure when
including details of the risks and operating issues facing the Group. deciding whether to authorise an actual or potential conflict of interest.
Sir Ian Robinson is the Company’s Senior Independent Director. His role Only independent directors (i.e. those who have no interest in the
includes providing a sounding board for the Chairman and acting as an matter under consideration) will be able to take the relevant decision,
intermediary for the non-executive directors, where necessary. The Board and in taking the decision the directors must act in good faith and
believes that Sir Ian continues to have the appropriate experience, in a way they consider will be most likely to promote the Company’s
knowledge and independence to continue in this role. success. Furthermore, the directors may, if appropriate, impose limits
The Chairman ensures that the Board maintains an appropriate dialogue
or conditions when granting authorisation.
with shareholders. Although the non-executive directors are not formally Any authorities are reviewed at least every 15 months. The Board
required to meet the shareholders of the Company, their attendance at considered and authorised each director’s reported actual and
presentations of the interim and annual results is encouraged. potential conflicts of interest at its July 2014 Board meeting and
considers changes on an ad hoc basis throughout the year.
BOARD EFFECTIVENESS
A performance evaluation of the Board and of its committees is carried out COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
annually to ensure that they continue to be effective and that each of the The Board has established a number of committees to assist in the
directors demonstrates commitment to his or her respective role and has discharge of its duties and the formal Terms of Reference for the principal
sufficient time to meet his or her commitment to the Company. committees, approved by the Board and complying with the Code, are
Last year, in compliance with the Code, the performance evaluation was available from the General Counsel and Company Secretary and can also
conducted by independent external facilitators, EquityCommunications be found on the Company’s website at www.compass-group.com. Their
Limited. Terms of Reference are reviewed annually and updated where necessary.
Membership and details of the principal committees are shown on pages
This year, an internal performance evaluation was conducted, taking into 51 and 52.
account the principal themes which had emerged from the preceding
external evaluation, notably enhancing the approach to the strategy The General Counsel and Company Secretary acts as Secretary to all
formulation process and continuing to focus on succession planning. Board committees.
Having conducted its evaluation, the Board noted that enhancement of
timetabling and processes had been achieved during 2014, enabling more
productive use of the Board’s time for discussion of strategic issues, and
Corporate governance
Gary Green 8 of 8 – – – – process conducted by Egon Zehnder International. She was subsequently
Andrew Martin 8 of 8 – – – – recommended to the Board for appointment on the basis that she met
Susan Murray 8 of 8 4 of 4 3 of 3 2 of 2 4 of 4 the criteria required, including having sufficient time to discharge the
Don Robert 8 of 8 4 of 4 3 of 3 2 of 2 4 of 4 requirements of the role. During the year, the Nomination Committee also
Sir Ian Robinson 8 of 8 4 of 4 3 of 3 2 of 2 4 of 4 considered (and recommended to the Board) the reappointment of John
Paul Walsh3 6 of 6 – 2 of 2 1 of 1 – Bason for a further three year term.
1 Carol Arrowsmith joined the Board on 1 June 2014 In the year ahead, the Nomination Committee will continue to assess
2 Sir Roy Gardner retired from the Board on 6 February 2014 the Board’s composition and how it may be enhanced and will consider
3 Paul Walsh joined the Board on 1 January 2014 diversity (gender and experience) and geographic representation and use
independent consultants as appropriate to ensure a broad search for
The table shows the number of meetings attended out of the number of
suitable candidates.
meetings which each director was eligible to attend. Directors who are not
members of individual Board committees have also been invited to attend
the appointment of new directors and senior executives with due regard (Chairman), Paul Walsh, Dominic Blakemore, Richard Cousins,
to diversity and gender. Prior to making an appointment, the Nomination Mark White (General Counsel and Company Secretary), Jane Kingston
Committee will evaluate the balance of skills, knowledge, independence, (Group Human Resources Director) and all of the non-executive directors
experience and diversity on the Board and, in the light of this evaluation, in office at the date of this Report. The Corporate Responsibility
will prepare a description of the role and capabilities required, with a view Committee met three times during the year and the director members’
to appointing the best placed individual for the role. attendance is shown in the table above. Our Corporate Responsibility
In identifying suitable candidates, the Nomination Committee: Report 2014 is available at www.compass-group.com/cr14 as well as on
pages 40 to 45 of this Report.
• uses open advertising or the services of external advisers to facilitate
the search
DISCLOSURE COMMITTEE the Audit Committee may require reports on matters of interest in addition
The Disclosure Committee ensures accuracy and timeliness of public to the regular items. The Audit Committee met four times during the year
announcements of the Company and monitors the Company’s obligations and members’ attendance at the meetings is set out in the table on page 51.
under the Listing Rules and Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the The Audit Committee invites Paul Walsh (Chairman), Richard Cousins
UK Listing Authority. (Group Chief Executive), Dominic Blakemore (Group Finance Director),
Meetings are held as required. At the date of this Report, the Disclosure Sarah Sergeant (Head of Financial Reporting and Control) and Trevor
Committee comprises Dominic Blakemore, Mark White, the Head of Gelnar (Director of Group Internal Audit), together with senior
Financial Reporting and Control and the Head of Investor Relations. representatives of the external auditor, to attend each meeting although,
from time to time, it reserves time for discussions without invitees being
present. Other senior management are invited to present such reports as
EXECUTIVE BOARD are required for the Audit Committee to discharge its duties.
The Executive Board is the key management committee for the Group
and comprises the executive directors of the Company, Andrew Furlong The Chairman of the Audit Committee attends the AGM to respond
(Regional Managing Director, Central Asia, Middle East, Africa & to any shareholder questions that might be raised on its activities. The
Turkey), Philippe Op de Beeck (Regional Managing Director, Asia remuneration of the members of the Audit Committee and the policy with
Pacific), Johnny Thomson (Regional Managing Director, Latin America), regard to the remuneration of the non-executive directors are set out on
Mark White and Jane Kingston. pages 68 and 74.
The Executive Board meets regularly and is responsible for developing
ACTIVITIES DURING THE YEAR
the Group’s strategy and capital expenditure and investment budgets and
The matters reviewed and evaluated by the Audit Committee during the
reporting on these areas to the Board for approval, implementing Group
year are set out below:
policy, monitoring financial, operational and customer quality of service
performance, health and safety, purchasing and supply chain issues, FINANCIAL REPORTING
succession planning and day to day management of the Group. • the appropriateness of the interim and annual financial statements
(including the announcements thereof to the London Stock Exchange)
with both management and the external auditor, including:
AUDIT COMMITTEE ––at the Board’s request, whether the Annual Report and Accounts,
OBJECTIVES taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides
The Audit Committee’s key objectives are the provision of effective the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s
governance over the appropriateness of the Group’s financial reporting, performance, business model and strategy
including the adequacy of related disclosures, the performance of both the ––the clarity of disclosures and compliance with financial reporting
internal and external audit functions, and the management of the Group’s standards and relevant financial and governance reporting
systems of internal control, business risks and related compliance activities. requirements
The Audit Committee’s Terms of Reference can be found at ––discussing the critical accounting policies and use of assumptions and
www.compass-group.com. estimates, as noted in section B of the accounting policies on page 87 of
this Annual Report, and concluding that the estimates, judgements and
COMPOSITION assumptions used were reasonable based on the information available
The Audit Committee comprises all of the non-executive directors in office and had been used appropriately in applying the Company’s
at the date of this Report. Members of the Audit Committee are appointed accounting policies
by the Board following recommendations by the Nomination Committee ––considering the nature and quantum of the purchasing income earned
and the Audit Committee’s membership is reviewed by the Nomination by the Group during the financial year. It also assessed the extent to
Committee and as part of the annual Board performance evaluation. which the amounts recognised required estimation and reviewed the
recoverability of amounts accrued at the year end with reference to
Each member of the Audit Committee brings relevant senior level financial aged analyses and subsequent cash receipts. Nothing arose during the
experience. The expertise and experience of the members of the Audit course of this review to indicate that purchasing income had not been
Committee are summarised on pages 46 and 47. The Board considers that accounted for in accordance with the Group's accounting policies
each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the definition • the material areas in which significant judgements have been applied,
set out in the Code. The Audit Committee’s Chairman, John Bason, is namely:
considered by the Board to have significant, recent and relevant financial ––the consideration of any goodwill impairment assessments and how
experience as Finance Director of Associated British Foods plc. these were addressed. The judgement largely relates to the assumptions
All members of the Audit Committee receive an appropriate induction, underlying the calculation of the value in use of the cash generating
which includes an overview of the business, its financial dynamics and units (CGUs) being tested for impairment, primarily the achievement
risks. Audit Committee members are expected to have an understanding of the three year business plan for the CGUs and the macroeconomic
of the principles of, and recent developments in, financial reporting, assumptions (such as discount rates) underpinning the valuation
including the applicable accounting standards and statements of process. The Committee receives reports from management outlining
recommended practice, key aspects of the Company’s policies, financing, the basis for the assumptions used. Business plans are approved by the
internal control mechanisms, and matters that require the use of Board. In addition, the external auditor provides detailed written
judgement in the presentation of accounts and key figures as well as the assessments to the Audit Committee in this area
role of internal and external auditors. Members of the Audit Committee ––the level of provisioning for contingent and other liabilities (including
undertake ongoing training as required. tax) where management, accounting and legal judgements are
important. The Committee discusses with management the key
AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETINGS judgements made, including relevant legal advice. The external auditor
The Audit Committee meets regularly throughout the year and its agenda also reports on all material provisions to the Committee
is linked to events in the Company’s financial calendar. Each member of • Going Concern
Corporate governance
nature with a fee that is not significant in the context of the audit or are
• retendering process for the auditor ● audit related services.
• appointment of KPMG LLP and associated ● ●
terms and fees and handover process between Within the constraints of applicable UK rules, the external auditor has
Deloitte LLP and KPMG LLP traditionally undertaken some due diligence reviews and other pieces
• approval and review of proposed audit plan ● ● of non-audit work. The provision of non-audit services within such
and procedures constraints and the agreed policy is assessed on a case by case basis so
–– review of auditor effectiveness and ● that the best placed adviser is retained. Principal non-audit services
appointment provided by Deloitte LLP to 14 March 2014 and by KPMG LLP since
–– review of the policy and update of provision ● ● ● 14 March 2014 approved by the Audit Committee during the year ended
of non-audit services provided by the
30 September 2014 comprised assistance on tax matters (in the case
external auditor
of Deloitte LLP), IT related services and due diligence advice in respect
OTHER MATTERS
of potential acquisitions.
• litigation and contingent liabilities ● ● ●
effectiveness of the audit; any major issues which arise during the course
of the audit and their resolution; key accounting and audit judgements; the As planned and discussed in last year’s Annual Report, following extensive
level of errors identified during the audit; the recommendations made to due diligence and agreement of a detailed timetable and step plan, in 2013
management by the auditor and management’s response; and the auditor’s the Audit Committee approved the issue of a formal Request for Proposal
overall performance. (RFP) for the appointment of the Company’s external auditor, in
accordance with the requirement under the Code that the audit should be
The Audit Committee also ensures that key partners within the external
put out to tender at least every 10 years. Responses to the RFP were
auditor are rotated from time to time in accordance with applicable UK
received during December 2013, assessed against agreed criteria and
rules. The Audit Committee monitors the extent of non-audit work which
presentations were made to the Audit Committee by shortlisted candidates
the external auditor can perform, to ensure that the provision of those
in January 2014. The Audit Committee recommended to the Board that
non-audit services that can be undertaken by the external auditor falls
Corporate governance
and approves Group budgets and strategies in light of these. Control is of its Annual Report. The Annual Report and Accounts is available
exercised at Group, regional and business level through the Group’s to all shareholders and can be accessed via the Company’s website at
Management and Performance (MAP) framework and monthly www.compass-group.com. The Group’s annual and interim results are
monitoring of performance by comparison with budgets, forecasts and also published on the Company’s website, together with all other
cash targets, and by regular visits to Group businesses by the Group Chief announcements and documents issued to the market, such as trading
Executive and the Group Finance Director. updates, interim management statements, interviews and presentations
This is underpinned by a formal major risk assessment process which by the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director.
is an integral part of the annual business cycle. Each of the Group’s The Notice of Annual General Meeting is circulated to all shareholders at
businesses is required to identify and document major risks facing their least 20 working days prior to such meeting and it is Company policy not to
business and appropriate mitigating activities and controls, and monitor combine resolutions to be proposed at general meetings. All shareholders
and report to management on the effectiveness of these controls on a are invited to the Company’s AGM at which they have the opportunity to
biannual basis. These reports, together with reports on internal control put questions to the Board and it is standard practice to have the chairmen
A summary of the dividends on ordinary shares for the year ended The Company is not aware of any significant agreements to which it is
30 September 2014 compared with 2013 is shown below: party that take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control of the
Company following a takeover.
Year Dividend Pence per share
More detailed information relating to the rights and obligations attaching
2013 Interim 8.0
to the Company’s ordinary shares, in addition to those conferred by law,
2013 Final 16.0
are set out in the Company’s Articles of Association, which are available on
2013 Total 24.0
the Company’s website as well as on pages 24 and 25 of the Annual Report
2014 Interim 8.8
for the year ended 30 September 2007. The 2007 Annual Report is
2014 Final (recommended) 17.7
available on the Company’s website at www.compass-group.com.
2014 Total 26.5 (10.5% increase on 2013)
REPURCHASE OF SHARES
The 2014 interim dividend of 8.8 pence per share (2013: 8.0 pence) was On 21 November 2012, the Company announced its intention to
paid to shareholders on 26 June 2014. commence a £400 million share repurchase programme. This
Payment of the recommended final dividend, if approved at the AGM programme was completed on 9 January 2014. On 27 November 2013,
to be held on 5 February 2015, will be made on 23 February 2015 to the Company announced its intention to commence a £500 million share
shareholders registered at the close of business on 23 January 2015. The repurchase programme, to be executed over the 12 month period to the
shares will be quoted ex-dividend from 22 January 2015. end of 2014. This programme was temporarily suspended following
announcement on 14 May 2014 of the £1 billion Return of Cash and
During the year, the trustees of each of the employee benefit trusts which Share Capital Consolidation until after completion of this transaction on
operate in connection with the Company’s share plans waived their rights 29 July 2014. The programme recommenced on 31 July 2014 and is now
to receive dividends on any shares held by them. Details of the trusts can expected to be completed by the end of 2015.
be found on page 57 of this Report. The amount of dividends waived
during the year ended 30 September 2014 was £20,677 (2013: £39,643). From 1 October 2013 to 26 March 2014 21,352,881 ordinary shares
of 10 pence each were purchased and subsequently cancelled for a
A dividend reinvestment plan is available to eligible shareholders. Details consideration of £196 million (including expenses) (representing 1.18%
can be found on page 144. of the ordinary shares in issue on 1 October 2013). From 31 July 2014 to
30 September 2014 8,200,000 ordinary shares of 10 5⁄8 pence each were
SHARE CAPITAL purchased and subsequently cancelled for a consideration of £80 million
GENERAL (including expenses) representing 0.49% of the ordinary shares in issue
At the General Meeting (GM) held on 11 June 2014 members voted in on 8 July 2014. From 1 October 2014 to the date of this Report a further
favour of the Company’s proposals to return approximately £1 billion 6,100,000 shares of 105⁄8 pence each of the Company (representing
to shareholders by way of a cash payment of 56 pence per ordinary share 0.36% of the ordinary shares in issue on 1 October 2014) were purchased
of 10 pence each held as at the record time of 6.00pm on 7 July 2014. and subsequently cancelled for a consideration of £60.6 million
The cash return was accompanied by a share consolidation whereby (including expenses).
shareholders received 16 new ordinary shares of 10 5⁄8 pence each in the At the AGM a special resolution will be proposed to renew the directors’
Company for every 17 ordinary shares of 10 pence each held at the record limited authority to repurchase ordinary shares in the market, last granted
time. This share capital reorganisation was effective and the new shares at the GM held on 11 June 2014. The directors consider it desirable for
were admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange from 8 July 2014. these general authorisations to be available in order to maintain an
Full details of the Return of Cash and Share Capital Consolidation were efficient capital structure whilst at the same time retaining the flexibility
set out in a Circular to shareholders dated 19 May 2014 which is available to fund infill acquisitions.
on the Company’s website at www.compass-group.com.
The authority sets the minimum and maximum prices which may be
At the date of this Report, 1,667,980,436 new ordinary shares of 105⁄8 pence paid and it will be limited to a maximum of 10% of the Company’s issued
each have been issued, are fully paid up and are quoted on the London ordinary share capital calculated at the latest practicable date prior to
Stock Exchange. In addition, the Company sponsors a Level I American the publication of the Notice of AGM. Any purchases of ordinary shares
Depositary Receipt programme with BNY Mellon, under which the will be by means of market purchases through the London Stock Exchange
Company’s shares are traded on the over the counter market in the form and any shares purchased may be cancelled or placed into treasury
of American Depositary Shares. in accordance with the Companies (Acquisition of Own Shares) (Treasury
During the year ended 30 September 2014, 3,338,288 options were Shares) Regulations 2003. The Company currently holds no shares
exercised and 1,333,578 awards released pursuant to the Company’s share in treasury.
option schemes and long term incentive plans, resulting in the allotment
of 4,671,866 new ordinary shares. A further 394,502 new ordinary shares
ISSUE OF SHARES
At the AGM, the directors will ask shareholders to renew the authority
have been allotted under these schemes since the end of the financial year
last granted to them at the GM held in 2014 to allot equity shares
to the date of this Report.
representing approximately one third of the issued ordinary shares
There are no restrictions on the transfer of ordinary shares in the capital of calculated at the latest practicable date prior to the publication of the
the Company other than certain restrictions which may from time to time Notice of AGM (the section 551 authority) and, in accordance with the
be imposed by law, for example, insider trading law. In accordance with Investment Management Association Allotment Guidelines, the directors
the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority, certain employees again propose to extend this by a further one third of the Company’s
are required to seek the approval of the Company to deal in its shares. issued ordinary share capital provided that such amount shall only be used
The Company is not aware of any agreements between shareholders that in connection with a rights issue. If approved, the authority will expire no
may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities and/or voting rights. later than 15 months from the date on which the resolution is passed, or at
the conclusion of the AGM to be held in 2016, whichever is the sooner.
The Company’s Articles of Association may only be amended by special
resolution at a general meeting of shareholders.
Corporate governance
no present intention to issue ordinary shares, other than pursuant to the new CEC Agreement through a Special Negotiating Body, comprising
Company’s employee share schemes, and this authority will maintain the employee representatives from each of the countries in which the Group
Company’s flexibility in relation to future share issues, including any issues operates within the EEA.
to finance business opportunities, should appropriate circumstances arise.
Permanent UK employees are normally invited to join the Company’s
Details of issues of new shares made during the year, together with details defined contribution pension scheme, Compass Retirement Income
of options granted over unissued capital, are set out in note 24 to the Savings Plan (CRISP), on the completion of two years’ service (this
consolidated financial statements on pages 124 to 126. includes any service that may have transferred across under the Transfer
of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE)).
SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDINGS CRISP has a corporate trustee. Following the retirement of its independent
The following major shareholdings have been notified to the Company as chairman, Tony Allen, on 30 November 2013, Nigel Palmer, a current
at 30 September 2014 and the date of this Report. employee of the Group, was appointed chairman of the trustees. The other
five trustee directors are UK based employees of the Group, two of whom
Details of awards made during the year and held by executive directors as depending on the local environment. Priority is given to the training of
at 30 September 2014 are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report employees and the development of their skills is of prime importance.
on pages 59 to 76. Employment of disabled people is considered on merit with regard only
to the ability of any applicant to carry out the role. Arrangements to
Details of employee share schemes and grants made during the year ended
enable disabled people to carry out the duties required will be made if
30 September 2014 to, and extant awards held by, employees are disclosed
it is reasonable to do so. An employee becoming disabled would, where
in note 24 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 124 to 126.
appropriate, be offered retraining.
The Group continues to operate on a decentralised basis. This provides the DONATIONS AND POLITICAL EXPENDITURE
maximum encouragement for the development of entrepreneurial flair, Charitable objectives support the Company’s corporate responsibility
balanced by a rigorous control framework exercised by a small head office strategy and have primarily focused on improving the environment,
team. Local management teams are responsible for maintaining high education, health and wellbeing, community engagement and responsible
standards of health and safety and for ensuring that there is appropriate business practice. Donations have included employee involvement through
employee involvement in decision making. fundraising and financial support.
Our Code of Ethics was developed in consultation with the CEC and the 2013 6.7
Institute of Business Ethics and sets out clear standards of behaviour that 2014 6.5
we expect all of our people to demonstrate and adhere to. The Code of
Ethics, which is part of our Code of Business Conduct, underpins our Since 2004, shareholders have passed an annual resolution, on a
social, ethical and environmental commitments and sends a clear message precautionary basis, to approve donations to EU political organisations and
to our stakeholders of our commitment to responsible business practice. to incur EU political expenditure (as such terms were defined under the
The 10 principles of the United Nations (UN) Global Compact, to which then relevant legislation) not exceeding a monetary limit approved by
we are a signatory, underpin our own Code of Ethics. This UN initiative shareholders. The Board has consistently confirmed that it operates a policy
encourages companies to make human rights, labour standards, of not giving any cash contribution to any political party in the ordinary
environmental responsibility and anti-corruption part of their business meaning of those words and that it has no intention of changing that policy.
agenda. Our annual Communication on Progress can be viewed at www. No material amount of corporate funds or paid employee time has been
unglobalcompact.org. utilised during the year for political activities and, in accordance with the
Our people are instrumental to our success; we respect and value the Company’s Code of Business Conduct, employees must not engage in any
individuality and diversity that every employee brings to the Group. form of lobbying or have contact with political representatives, government
We base our relationship with our employees on respect for the dignity employees or public interest groups unless they are doing so legitimately
of the individual and fair treatment for all. and adhering to internal control processes. Further information regarding
the Code of Business Conduct can be found on page 54 of this Annual
As at 30 September 2014, there were 514,718 (2013: 506,699) people
Report and on the Company’s website at www.compass-group.com.
employed by the Group (average number of employees including directors
and part-time employees) of whom 288,242 were female (2013: 280,971) The directors propose to renew the authority granted at the AGM in 2014
and 226,476 were male (2013: 225,728). Of these, 762 were senior for the Group to make political donations and incur political expenditure
managers (575 male, 187 female) (2013: 541 male, 182 female) which (as such terms are defined in sections 362 to 365 of the CA 2006) until the
include members of our global leadership team and individuals who are Company’s next AGM, which they might otherwise be prohibited from
statutory directors of the corporate entities whose financial information making or incurring under the terms of the CA 2006 and which would not
is included in the Group’s consolidated accounts in this Annual Report. amount to ‘donations’ in the ordinary sense of the word. It is proposed to
In terms of the Company’s Board, as at 30 September 2014 there were maintain the limit of such authority at £100,000.
10 directors, eight of whom were male and two female. Prior to any
appointment to the Board the Nomination Committee gives due regard to CREST
diversity and gender with a view to appointing the best placed individual The Company’s ordinary shares and sterling Eurobonds are in CREST,
for the role. the settlement system for stocks and shares.
We seek to create a positive, open working environment wherever we
operate. Our employee policies are set locally to comply with local law DISCLOSURES REQUIRED UNDER UK LISTING RULE 9.8.4
within an overall Group framework and we monitor our employee There are no disclosures required to be made under UK Listing Rule 9.8.4.
satisfaction and engagement through a number of key performance
indicators, details of which can be found on pages 44 and 45 of the SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
Corporate Responsibility section of the Strategic Report. Details of services provided to shareholders can be found in the Shareholder
Information section on pages 144 and 145 and on the Company’s website.
We also consider the concerns of wider communities where we operate,
including national and local interests, utilising our relevant expertise to AGM
help contribute to the wellbeing of communities which are appropriate The Notice of Meeting setting out the resolutions to be proposed at the
to our business objectives. Furthermore, the Group supports the rights of AGM to be held on 5 February 2015, together with explanatory notes,
all people as set out in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights is set out on pages 146 to 151 of this Annual Report and is also available at
(UN Declaration) and considers carefully before doing any business in www.compass-group.com. The directors consider that each of the resolutions
countries that do not adhere to the UN Declaration. is in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders as a whole and
recommend that shareholders vote in favour of all of the resolutions.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REPORTING
The Company is required to state the annual quantity of emissions in On behalf of the Board
tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from activities for which the Group
is responsible, including the combustion of fuel and the operation of any
facility. Details of our emissions during the year ended 30 September 2014
are set out within the Corporate Responsibility section of the Strategic MARK WHITE
Report on pages 42 and 43 and form part of the Directors’ Report General Counsel and Company Secretary
disclosures. Further details of the actions which the Group is taking to 26 November 2014
reduce emissions can also be found in our online Corporate Responsibility
Report at www.compass-group.com/cr14. Compass Group PLC
Registered in England and Wales No. 4083914
Strategic report
ANNUAL STATEMENT 2013-2014 REMUNERATION REVIEW
The Committee has been considering the competitive positioning of
DEAR SHAREHOLDER remuneration for the Company’s executive directors for some time and
INTRODUCTION has revisited this during the last 12 months. The executive team is well
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the 2013-2014 Directors’ established and under the leadership of Richard Cousins has delivered
Remuneration Report. great value to shareholders in the form of outstanding Total Shareholder
Return (TSR) growth (455% in the eight years since Richard Cousins’
I was delighted to be appointed to the Compass Group PLC Board and appointment as Group Chief Executive), a progressive dividend and the
as Chairman of the Remuneration Committee in June of this year. My Return of Cash.
thanks go to Sir Ian Robinson, who served as Chairman of the Committee
from April 2013, for his support when I took over the role. This very strong performance means that Compass is now a much bigger
business and is far more valuable for shareholders. But over the same
Corporate governance
In my first annual statement to shareholders, I would like to share with period both bonus opportunities and LTIP awards have remained
you both the corporate performance and related incentive outcomes for unchanged at a maximum of 150% of salary, other than for Richard
2013-2014 and our thinking on our longer term approach towards Cousins who became eligible for an LTIP award at a maximum value
executive remuneration. We informed shareholders, when we published of 200% of salary in 2010.
the Company’s first remuneration policy last year, that we would present
a policy statement designed to operate for three years at the forthcoming The combination of this level of growth and the Company’s disciplined
Annual General Meeting (AGM), once we had reviewed our policy against and conservative approach to remuneration has meant that our
the needs of the business and emerging reporting practice. We believe that remuneration policy now falls significantly short of the market norm –
we have now reached that point and below I have set out the context for the most of our executive directors are in the lower quartile against their peers
changes that you will see in the following Policy Report. when we assess their total remuneration opportunity with companies of
our size. We are confident that our executives have and will continue to
PERFORMANCE IN 2013-2014 deliver great value to shareholders and that our performance measures are
relevant and appropriate, but the Committee now believes that this gap
During the last 12 months, we have been able to reward shareholders Finally, we will continue to seek to pay base salaries sensibly against the
through sustained growth in dividends, our ongoing share buyback market and to provide shareholders with as much visibility as we can for
programmes, and the £1 billion Return of Cash in July 2014. the year ahead. All executive directors’ salaries will be reviewed in January
going forward and our expectation is that most directors will be eligible for
The incentive outcomes, as presented in the Annual Remuneration pay awards in line with our employees in the relevant market. We have
Report on pages 59 to 76, reflect achievement against these key typically appointed new executive directors at pay levels below the market
performance factors. rate and then moved their pay up to reflect experience and performance
in the role. Dominic Blakemore was appointed as Group Finance Director
in February 2012 and this was his first role as a PLC finance director.
Dominic has performed very well and so his pay was increased by 9.4% in
Shareholder information
CONCLUSION
The principles underlying our executive remuneration philosophy remain
unchanged, namely a moderate approach, which enables our executives’
remuneration to reflect business performance. We believe that the
proposed changes will align our executives’ total opportunity with the
FTSE 50, where Compass now clearly sits, but remain in line with our
overall modest approach, given the size, international reach and
performance of the business. The Committee’s intent is that this revised
policy will be in place for at least three years and that shareholders will
vote on it and the accompanying changes in the LTIP rules at the AGM
next February.
I have joined Compass at an exciting time. I believe that our modified
approach to certain elements of executive remuneration will be in the
long term interests of the Company and shareholders, and I look forward
to participating in the implementation of our remuneration strategy for
the future.
I recommend the following Governance Summary, Policy Report and
Annual Remuneration Report to shareholders.
CAROL ARROWSMITH
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
26 November 2014
Corporate governance
personal contribution to the success of the business. The Committee directors and the Chairman
reviews the remuneration arrangements for Group employees whose • annual review of Terms of Reference for the Committee
salaries exceed a specified level and administers the Company’s share
incentive plans. The Committee also determines the Chairman’s STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OF DRR
remuneration, although the Board itself determines the level of fees paid As for last year, this DRR has been prepared on behalf of the Board by
to the non-executive directors. No directors are involved in determining the Committee in accordance with the requirements of the Companies
their own remuneration. The Committee maintains an active dialogue Act 2006 and the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups
with shareholder representatives and its full Terms of Reference are set (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (Regulations).
out on the Company’s website at www.compass-group.com. Because our financial reporting period ends on 30 September, we were
The Committee consists entirely of independent non-executive one of the first companies last year to prepare the DRR in accordance
directors, as defined in the UK Corporate Governance Code (the with the new Regulations, while best practice was still emerging. With
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE ACTIVITY DURING THE YEAR The information set out on pages 59 to 76 of this DRR represents the
The key activities of the Committee during the year ended auditable disclosures referred to in the auditor’s report on pages 79 and
30 September 2014 were: 80 as specified by the UK Listing Authority and the Regulations, save
for the total shareholder return graph, Group Chief Executive’s
• a review of the draft Directors’ Remuneration Report (DRR) for
remuneration history and remuneration percentage change tables,
2012-2013 following consultation with major shareholders and a
spend on pay table, details of advice provided to the Committee and
review of the 2013 AGM voting results
statement of shareholder voting.
• determination of the extent to which the performance measures
for the long term incentive and bonus plans were achieved
(including the treatment of the exceptional costs of the European
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
The voting outcome at the 6 February 2014 AGM in respect of the
restructuring programme) as well as approving the changed
DRR for the year ended 30 September 2013 is set out on page 76 and
performance criteria for the LTIP, following consultation with,
reflected very strong individual and institutional shareholder support.
and approval by, shareholders
During September 2014, major shareholders were consulted regarding
• annual review of directors’ share ownership against the
changes to the Remuneration Policy to take effect following approval
Shareholder information
REMUNERATION POLICY within the Group and is sensitive to these, to prevailing market and
economic conditions and to governance trends when assessing the level
REMUNERATION POLICY AND COMPONENTS of salaries and remuneration packages of executive directors and other
The Committee reviews the Company’s remuneration philosophy members of the Executive Board.
and structure to ensure that remuneration supports the Company’s The total remuneration package links corporate and individual
strategic objectives, is in line with best practice and can fairly reward performance with an appropriate balance between short and long term
individuals for the contribution that they make to the business. In elements, and fixed and variable components. The Policy is designed
doing this we have regard to the size and complexity of the Group’s to incentivise executives to meet the Company’s key objectives, such
operations and the need to motivate and attract employees of the that a significant portion of total remuneration is performance related,
highest calibre. based on a mixture of internal targets linked to the Company’s key
We have tried to develop our policy to maintain stability in the business drivers (which can be measured, understood and accepted
executive team and to ensure appropriate positioning against our by both executives and shareholders (with whom we consulted during
comparator groups. Overall, we believe that our policy (the Policy) the year)) and appropriate external comparator groups.
is now structured so that the executive directors are fairly rewarded, The Committee considers that the targets set for the different
with the aim to keep reward at or around median, in line with components of performance related remuneration are both appropriate
appropriate benchmarks for the markets in which the Company and sufficiently demanding in the context of the business environment
operates. We consider our approach to be moderate and that it will and the challenges with which the Group is faced as well as complying
stand the test of time. with the provisions of the Code.
The Group has more than 500,000 employees in over 50 different The Committee has the discretion to amend certain aspects of the Policy
jurisdictions which means that formal consultation with employees in in exceptional circumstances (as detailed below) when considered to be
respect of remuneration is impracticable. However, the Committee in the best interests of shareholders. Should such discretion be used, this
considers general pay and employment conditions of all employees will be explained and reported in the DRR for the following year.
BASE SALARY Base salaries are reviewed annually with any Whilst there is no prescribed None.
Reflects the individual’s increases normally taking effect on 1 January formulaic maximum, any increases
role, experience and of each year. Salaries are appropriately will take into account prevailing
contribution. Set at levels to benchmarked and reflect the role, job size and market and economic conditions
attract and retain individuals responsibility as well as the performance and and the approach to employee pay
of the calibre required to effectiveness of the individual. throughout the organisation.
lead the business.
Significant increases may occur
when an executive director
progresses in the role; gains
substantially in experience; there
is a significant increase in the
scale of the role; has been
recruited on a salary below the
market median.
Where changes in responsibilities
or significant variances to the
market exist, these will be
appropriately explained.
BENEFITS AND PENSION Benefits include, but are not limited to, The cost of providing these None.
To provide a competitive healthcare insurance for executive directors and benefits can vary in accordance
level of benefits. their dependants, limited financial advice, life with market conditions, which
assurance and car benefit. will, therefore, determine the
maximum value.
These are offered to executive directors as part
of a competitive remuneration package. For the Company’s defined
contribution pension scheme or
Executive directors are invited to participate
cash allowance, the maximum
in the Company’s defined contribution pension
annual contribution is 35% of
scheme or to take a cash allowance in lieu
base salary.
of pension entitlement.
Corporate governance
ANNUAL BONUS The annual bonus is earned by the achievement The target award for executive Performance is measured
Incentivise and reward of one year performance targets set by the directors (excluding the Group over the financial year.
the achievement of Committee at the start of each financial year Chief Executive) is 75% of base Performance measures
stretching one year key and is delivered in cash. salary, with a further maximum of are determined by the
performance targets set by 75% of base salary available for Committee each year and
The Committee retains the discretion to adjust
the Committee at the start enhanced performance. 0% of the may vary to ensure that they
the bonus outcomes to ensure that they reflect
of each financial year. bonus pays out for below threshold promote the Company’s long
underlying business performance. In particular,
performance but increases on a term business strategy and
adjustments may be made for acquisitions and
straight line basis to target payout. shareholder value.
disposals. Bonus measures dependent on
Adjusted Free Cash Flow (AFCF) are subject to Following consultation with major The bonus measures and
the caveat that AFCF should not be affected by shareholders in 2014, and subject their percentage weightings
Board approved capital expenditure or other to shareholder approval at the AGM may vary, depending upon
special or irregular timing differences. to be held on 5 February 2015, it a director’s area of
is proposed that the target award responsibility.
Component and link to strategy Operation of the component Maximum opportunity Performance measures
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) An annual conditional award of ordinary shares Following consultation with major Performance is measured
Incentivise and reward in the capital of the Company which may be shareholders, and subject to over three financial years.
executive directors for the earned after a single three year performance shareholder approval at the AGM
Performance measures are
delivery of longer term period, based on the achievement of stretching to be held on 5 February 2015,
AFCF, improvement in
financial performance and performance conditions. awards may be made with the
ROCE and TSR, each
shareholder value. following maximum levels:
Calculations of the achievement of the targets measure applying to one
Share based to provide are independently performed and are approved • Group Chief Executive: 250% third of an award.
alignment with shareholder by the Committee. In order to ensure continued • Other executive directors: 200%
Relative TSR is measured
interests. alignment between executive directors’ and
For performance measures relative to the companies
shareholders’ interests, the Committee also
other than TSR, 0% of the comprising the TSR
ADJUSTED FREE CASH FLOW reviews the underlying financial performance
award vests for below threshold comparator group at the
(AFCF) of the Group and retains its discretion to adjust
performance, increasing to 50% start of the period (the
The generation of cash is vesting if it considers that performance is
vesting on a straight line basis constituent members of
fundamental to the ongoing unsatisfactory.
for achievement of on target the FTSE 100, excluding
success of the Group and the
Subject to shareholder approval at the AGM on performance, increasing to financial services
use of AFCF as an LTIP
5 February 2015, in respect of awards made maximum vesting on a straight companies).
performance measure
from 2014-2015 onwards, executive directors line basis for achievement of
directly aligns to this. For awards made prior to
will be required to hold vested LTIP shares (net maximum performance.
7 February 2013, 50% of
of any shares sold to meet tax and social security
RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED The element of an award based on any award was based on
liabilities) for a period of two years post vesting.
(ROCE) relative TSR will vest in full for top AFCF over the three year
In parallel, ROCE supports Dividend equivalents may be accrued on the quartile performance achievement performance period and
the strategic focus on shares earned from any awards after the and 25% of that element of the 50% on the Company’s
growth and margins through 2015 AGM. award will vest if performance is at TSR over the same period
ensuring that cash is the median. Awards will vest on a relative to the companies
Malus and clawback rules operate in respect
reinvested to generate straight line basis between median comprising the TSR
of the LTIP. The Committee may decide at any
appropriate returns. and top quartile performance comparator group at the
time before an award vests, or for a period of
achievement. No shares will be start of the relevant period.
three years after an award vests, that any
RELATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER released for this element of an
participant will be subject to malus and/or LTIP targets are set with
RETURN (TSR) award if the Company’s TSR
clawback in the event of discovery of a material reference to internal
The third performance performance is below the median.
misstatement in the accounts or in the budgets and analysts’
measure of TSR provides
assessment of a relevant performance consensus forecasts, with
direct alignment between
condition, or where the action or conduct maximum payment requiring
the interests of executive
of a participant amounts to fraud or serious performance well ahead
directors and shareholders.
misconduct or has a detrimental impact on of budget.
the reputation of the Group.
Details of the targets for
Awards are delivered in shares. However, the LTIP awards vesting and
rules contain excepted provisions to deliver value granted are set out as
in cash if necessary (for example, because of required in the Annual
securities laws), subject to the discretion of the Remuneration Report
Committee, determined at any time up to on pages 72 and 73.
their release.
In the event of a change of control, any
unvested awards will vest immediately, subject
to satisfaction of performance conditions and
reduction on a time apportioned basis.
NOTES TO THE REMUNERATION POLICY TABLE – CHANGES FROM PRIOR REMUNERATION POLICY
• The Group Chief Executive’s annual bonus and LTIP opportunity have been increased to 200% (previously 150%) and 250% (previously
200%) of base salary respectively
• LTIP awards for the other executive directors have been increased to 200% (previously 150%) of salary
• The changes in incentive levels are proposed in order to maintain suitably competitive levels of remuneration for the senior executive
population and following consultation with our largest shareholders
• In addition, a two year holding period has been introduced into the LTIP which commences at the end of the three year vesting period.
This has been introduced to further strengthen the long term alignment of the executives’ remuneration packages with shareholders.
It also helps facilitate malus and clawback if required
The executive directors’ Remuneration Policy differs from that of other members of the Executive Board solely in respect of quantum of the
various components and remuneration. Members of the wider leadership team receive each of the components of remuneration awarded
to the executive directors. The wider employee population of the Group will receive remuneration that is considered to be appropriate in relation
to their geographic location, level of responsibility and performance.
Corporate governance
equal to the value of their base fee.
dilution under all plans should not exceed 10% over a 10 year period
in relation to the Company’s issued share capital (or reissue of For executive directors, the guideline shareholding may be achieved
treasury shares), with a further limitation of 5% in any 10 year by retaining shares received as a result of participating in the
period for executive plans. Company’s share plans. The guidance specifically excludes the need
to make a personal investment should awards not vest. Non-executive
The Committee monitors the position regularly and prior to the directors are expected to purchase shares equating to a minimum value
making of any award, to ensure that the Company remains within of one third of their net of tax fee each year until the guideline is met.
these limits. Any awards which are required to be satisfied by market The required level of shareholding is expected to be achieved within
purchased shares are excluded from such calculations. No treasury a four year period, commencing on 1 October 2010 or on date of
shares were held or utilised in the year ended 30 September 2014. appointment, if later.
As at 30 September 2014, the Company’s headroom position, If the guideline is not met within this timeframe, then the Committee
which remains within current Guidelines, was as shown in the
1
2
Shareholder information
ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE APPLICATION OF OUR Each bar gives an indication of the minimum amount of remuneration
REMUNERATION POLICY payable, remuneration payable at target performance and
The value and composition of the executive directors’ remuneration remuneration payable at maximum performance to each director
packages for the year ending 30 September 2015 at below threshold, under the Policy.
threshold (par or target) and maximum scenarios under the Policy to Each of the bars is broken down to show how the total under each
be voted upon at the forthcoming AGM are set out in the charts below. scenario is made up of fixed elements of remuneration, the annual
The graphs show an estimate of the remuneration that could bonus and the LTIP.
be received by executive directors under the Policy set out in
this Report.
Maximum 24% 34% 42% TOTAL £5.9M Maximum 28% 31% 41% TOTAL £2.6M
Target 37% 27% 36% TOTAL £3.7M Target 43% 23% 34% TOTAL £1.7M
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Maximum 29% 30% 41% TOTAL £3.6M Maximum 29% 30% 41% TOTAL £3.2M
Target 44% 23% 33% TOTAL £2.3M Target 44% 23% 33% TOTAL £2.1M
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
1 Note that Gary Green’s elements of pay are converted into sterling at an exchange rate of US$1.6579/£1.
2 Based on AFCF and ROCE performance measures vesting at 50% of maximum and the TSR measure paying out at 62.5% of maximum (midway between threshold and
maximum payout).
Corporate governance
and 250% of base salary in respect of the bonus and LTIP opportunity • Life assurance
• Financial planning advice
per annum respectively. However, in exceptional circumstances, the • 25 days’ paid annual leave
rules allow for a maximum of 400% of base salary to be utilised for the • Participation in annual bonus plan, subject to plan
LTIP opportunity. rules
• Participation in LTIP, subject to plan rules
Other arrangements may be established specifically to facilitate CHANGE OF • No special contractual provisions apply in the event of
recruitment of a particular individual, albeit that any such CONTROL a change of control
arrangement would be made within the context of minimising the cost NOTICE PERIOD • 12 months’ notice from the Company
to the Company. The policy for the recruitment of executive directors • 6 months’ notice from the director (12 months’ from
during the Policy Period includes the opportunity to provide a level of Richard Cousins)
compensation for forfeiture of bonus entitlements and/or unvested long TERMINATION Payment in lieu of notice equal to:
PAYMENT
term incentive awards from an existing employer, if any, and the • 12 months’ base salary
in its absolute discretion allow for awards to continue until the normal
vesting date and be satisfied, subject to achievement of the attendant
performance conditions. In such circumstances, awards vesting will
normally be prorated on a time apportioned basis, unless the
Committee determines otherwise.
Any such discretion in respect of leavers would only be applied by Subject to a cap on the maximum amount of fees payable to any
the Committee to ‘good leavers’ where it considers that continued non-executive director of £125,000 per annum, an additional fee of
participation is justified, for example, by reference to prior £22,000 per annum is payable where a non-executive director acts as
performance to the date of leaving. The malus and clawback Chairman of either the Audit or Remuneration Committee and
provisions would continue to apply in the event that such discretion £12,000 is payable to the Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility
was exercised. Committee. An additional fee of £27,000 per annum is also payable
for the director nominated as Senior Independent Director. None of
Service contracts outline the components of remuneration paid to the
these additional fees have been increased with effect from 1 October
individual but do not prescribe how remuneration levels may be
2014. Non-executive directors are not eligible for pension scheme
adjusted from year to year.
membership, bonus, incentive arrangements or other benefits, save
The senior executives who are members of the Executive Board, and reimbursement of travel costs.
who are referred to in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements
Non-executive directors have letters of engagement setting out their
on page 97, have similar service contracts.
duties and the time commitment expected. They are appointed for an
The executive directors have served on the Board for the periods initial period of three years, after which the appointment is renewable
shown below and have service agreements dated as follows: at three year intervals by mutual consent. In accordance with the
Length of Board Code, all directors offer themselves for annual re-election by
service as at shareholders. Details of non-executive directors’ appointments, which
Date of contract 30 Sep 2014
are terminable without compensation, are set out in the table below,
Dominic Blakemore 12 December 2011 2 years, 7 months
together with the dates on which their appointments have been
Richard Cousins 22 November 2007 8 years, 5 months
Gary Green 27 November 2007 7 years, 9 months
formally revised:
Andrew Martin 27 November 2007 10 years, 6 months Total length of
Original date of Letter of service as at
Non-executive director appointment engagement 30 Sep 2014
Corporate governance
responsibilities makes meaningful comparisons with any group of
TOTAL RETURN INDICES – COMPASS V FTSE 100 employees difficult and due caution should be exercised in this regard.
(SEPTEMBER)
Dominic Blakemore 510 480 16 16 688 608 1,217 – 179 168 2,610 1,272
Richard Cousins 970 966 42 44 1,303 1,224 3,643 2,960 340 338 6,298 5,532
Gary Green1 721 748 38 45 1,090 1,116 2,062 1,708 255 262 4,166 3,879
Andrew Martin 650 650 43 47 928 878 1,656 1,332 228 228 3,505 3,135
Total by component 2,851 2,844 139 152 4,009 3,826 8,578 6,000 1,002 996 16,579 13,818
1 Gary Green’s salary of US$1.950 million and his other emoluments are shown in sterling at an exchange rate of US$1.6579/£1 (2013: US$1.5652/£1).
2 Salary increases of 3% for Messrs Cousins and Green were implemented on 1 July 2014 and 1 January 2014 respectively. Dominic Blakemore received a salary increase of
9.4% on 1 January 2014 in recognition of his progression in the role and gain in experience.
3 Taxable benefits comprise healthcare insurance, limited financial advice, life assurance and car benefit.
4 Details of the performance measures and weighting as well as achieved results for the bonus and LTIP components are shown below.
5 LTIP 2014: Amount shown is the vesting value as at 26 November 2014 (the date of vesting) of LTIPs that have become receivable as a result of the achievement of conditions
relating to performance in the three years ended 30 September 2014, calculated in accordance with the Regulations.
6 LTIP 2013: Amount shown is indicative vesting value on 13 November 2013. The value subsequently received by Messrs Cousins, Green and Martin, based on the closing
share price on the day prior to release was £2,928,465, £1,689,922 and £1,317,798 respectively, equating to a total combined sum received of £5,936,185, or £64,000
less than the indicative value reported.
7 Pension: A supplement of 35% of base salary is paid in monthly instalments in lieu of pension participation.
The annual rate of base salaries of the executive directors for the year ended 30 September 2014 were:
Director Base Salary Effective Date Increase Reason
Dominic Blakemore £525,000 1 January 2014 9.4% Progression in the role; gain in experience
Richard Cousins £994,465 1 July 2014 3% Benchmarked v comparator group
Gary Green US$1,205,182 1 January 2014 3% Benchmarked v comparator group
Andrew Martin £650,000 1 January 2014 Nil Benchmarked v comparator group
The annual rate of base salaries of the executive directors from 1 January 2015 are:
Director Base Salary Effective Date Increase Reason
Dominic Blakemore £600,000 1 January 2015 14.3% Progression in the role; gain in experience
Richard Cousins £1,014,354 1 January 2015 2% Benchmarked v comparator group
Gary Green US$1,241,337 1 January 2015 3% Benchmarked v comparator group
Andrew Martin £669,500 1 January 2015 3% Benchmarked v comparator group
Non-executive directors receive fees only, which are shown on page 74, together with the Chairman’s fees and benefits. The aggregate total
amount of remuneration received by all directors during the year ended 30 September 2014 is shown below:
2014 2013
£000 £000
2013-2014 BONUS
PERFORMANCE MEASURE OUTCOMES
The financial targets for the bonus for the year ended 30 September 2014, and the extent to which they were achieved, were as set out below.
The achievement of targets is calculated on a straight line basis between Minimum and Par (target) and between Par (target) and Maximum.
As was the case for previous years, the measurement of the achievement of the AFCF and PBIT results is based on the underlying outcome
achieved in the financial year, so that charges, such as those related to the European exceptional and goodwill impairment, are excluded.
Financial Measures1 Minimum Par (target) Maximum Achieved
1 Financial measures for 2013-2014 bonus purposes are all set at 2014 budget rates, not actuals.
2 PBIT is underlying profit before interest and tax.
3 AFCF is adjusted free cash flow.
HSE Improvement 2013-2014 Target 2013-2014 achieved Target achieved
Corporate governance
1 MAWC is 12 months average working capital balance.
2 ORG is organic revenue growth.
3 Messrs Blakemore and Cousins waived their entitlements to any bonus related to the achievement of HSE related targets to recognise that the Group had suffered two fatalities
during the year, one in South Africa and the other in Mexico, which had occurred whilst each employee had been at work.
4 HSE for the North American business is measured through PBIT.
BONUS PAYOUT
The outcome of the annual bonus for the year ended 30 September 2014 was due to the strong underlying financial performance aligned with the
delivery of the Group’s long term strategy. The table below shows the resulting payout to each executive director in such capacity:
2013-2014 bonus payment
(as % of base salary) Value of bonus
No discretion was applied by the Committee in respect of directors’ bonuses for the year under review. The rules of the current annual bonus plan
do not include any deferment of payment of any element of the same.
2014-2015 BONUS
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The annual bonus elements for executive directors for the year ending 30 September 2015 are:
The Committee has set the targets for the annual bonus plan for the year ended 30 September 2015 but has chosen not to disclose the details
in this Report as it is the opinion of the Committee that it may be seriously prejudicial to the interests of the Company to do so, and our major
competitors do not disclose their targets or projected forecasts. However, the specific targets and the extent to which the targets have been met
will be disclosed in next year’s Report.
performance periods which will end on 30 September 2016, based on the achievement of stretching performance conditions. The maximum levels
achievable under these awards are set out in the table below:
LTIP award Face value of award1
Director (as a % of base salary) £000
1 Face value of award as at the date of grant on 29 November 2013 based on the market price of 921.00 pence per share on that day.
The table below sets out the performance measures for the awards:
Definition of measure Weighting
Adjusted FCF Adjusted FCF includes capital expenditure, net interest and net tax spend but excludes discontinued activities, acquisition spend,
disposal proceeds, and unusual or irregular timing differences. ¹⁄³
ROCE improvement The definition aims to measure the underlying economic performance of the Company. ROCE is calculated using constant
currency values for the underlying operating profit, net of tax at the underlying rate for the year, and after profit relating to non-controlling
interests. The capital employed figure excludes the post-employment benefit asset/liability, net of deferred tax, impaired goodwill, amortised
intangibles arising on acquisitions and the net assets relating to non-controlling interests. ¹⁄³
TSR Performance compared to that of constituent members of the FTSE 100 (excluding financial services companies). TSR is the aggregate of share
price growth and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment of those dividends in the Company’s shares during the three year performance period). ¹⁄³
In setting the performance targets, the Committee considers internal budgets and the Group’s strategic plan, market expectations and general
economic conditions. The table below shows the targets against which performance has been measured to determine the vesting of the grant of
awards for the year ended 30 September 2014 and forms part of the Policy detailed in the Policy Report on pages 62 to 68.
TARGETS FOR AWARDS VESTED IN RESPECT OF THE YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
AFCF TARGET
Level of performance Vesting % of each component AFCF
Threshold 0% £2,360m
Maximum 100% £2,478m
TSR TARGET
Level of performance Vesting % of each component
Below Median 0%
Median 25%
Upper Quartile 100%
The table below shows the targets against which performance will be measured to determine the vesting of the grant of awards for the year ending
30 September 2015 and forms part of the Policy detailed in the Policy Report on pages 62 to 68.
TARGETS FOR AWARDS PROPOSED TO BE MADE IN THE YEAR ENDING 30 SEPTEMBER 2015
AFCF AND ROCE TARGETS
Level of performance Vesting % of each component AFCF ROCE
Below Median 0%
Median 25%
Upper Quartile 100%
Such awards are proposed to be made after the AGM on 5 February 2015.
The vesting of the shares under each performance condition is independent. Therefore, the total vesting amount is based on the relevant percentage
achievement for each performance measure.
Awards vest on a straight line basis between threshold and par and between par and maximum. If performance under a component does not reach
the threshold level, vesting for that component will be nil. At the end of the performance period, the Committee will review the underlying financial
performance of the Company and retain its discretion to adjust vesting if it considers that financial performance is unsatisfactory.
The Committee will review annually whether the measures and targets described above remain appropriate and challenging. Calculations of the
achievement of the targets will be independently performed and approved by the Committee. The Committee will retain discretion to adjust for
material events which occur during the performance period and will make full and clear disclosure of any such adjustments in the DRR, together
with details of the achieved AFCF, ROCE and TSR performance, as determined by the above definitions, at the end of the performance period.
Corporate governance
The table below sets out the percentage of each LTIP award made to executive directors within the last five years which has vested and the
percentage of each extant award, had it vested on 30 September 2014:
TSR % vested on maturity or ROCE % vested AFCF % vested
Year of award Maturity date Performance conditions indicative vesting percentage on maturity on maturity
AFCF targets for each of the last three years are shown within note 25 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 126 to 130.
LTIP
As at Awarded during Released during Lapsed during As at Market price
30 Sep 2013: the year: the year: the year: 30 Sep 2014: at date
number of number of number of number of number of of award: Date of Maturity
Director shares shares shares shares shares pence award date
Notes:
50% of each award granted prior to 7 February 2013 is based on a three year AFCF target, and 50% is based on growth in the Company’s TSR relative to the FTSE 100, excluding
Shareholder information
PENSIONS
At 30 September 2014, there were no executive directors actively participating in any Compass Group defined benefit pension arrangements and
none of the executive directors was accruing additional entitlement to benefit under any arrangements that existed prior to their appointment as
executive directors.
Dominic Blakemore, Richard Cousins and Gary Green each receive a salary supplement equal to 35% of their base salaries in lieu of pension.
Andrew Martin has, since 6 April 2006, received a salary supplement equal to 35% of his base salary and has waived all rights to his final salary
pension, money purchase pension and unfunded unapproved pension relating to his employment prior to that date.
EXIT PAYMENTS
No executive directors left the Company during the year ended 30 September 2014 and therefore no payments for compensation for loss of office
were paid to, or receivable by, any director (30 September 2013: nil). No payments (other than regular pension benefits which were commenced in
previous years) were made during the year ended 30 September 2014 to any past director of the Company. No payment for compensation for loss
of office was paid to Sir Roy Gardner when he retired as Chairman and as a director on 6 February 2014.
EXTERNAL APPOINTMENTS
Executive directors may take up one non-executive directorship outside of the Group subject to the Board’s approval, provided that such
appointment is not likely to lead to a conflict of interest. It is recognised that non-executive duties can broaden experience and knowledge which
can benefit the Company. Dominic Blakemore, Richard Cousins and Andrew Martin received fees of €100,434, £56,000 and £60,000 during the
year in respect of their directorships of Shire plc, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and easyJet plc respectively, which they were permitted to retain.
Richard Cousins retired as a director of Reckitt Benckiser on 7 May 2014. As at the date of this Report, Richard Cousins had been appointed
a non-executive director of Tesco PLC with effect from 1 November 2014. Any remuneration received by Richard Cousins in respect of this
appointment will be reported in next year’s DRR.
1 Non-executive director fee of £81,000 per annum prorated from 1 January 2014 to 6 February 2014 plus Chairmanship fee of £475,000 per annum prorated from
6 February 2014 to 30 September 2014.
2 Benefits include healthcare insurance, limited financial advice, life assurance and car benefit.
3 Chairmanship fee of £432,806 per annum prorated from 1 October 2013 to 6 February 2014.
Details of the fees paid to each of the non-executive directors in office for the year ended 30 September 2014 are set out below:
2014 2013
£000 £000
Carol Arrowsmith1 34 –
John Bason 103 103
Susan Murray 93 93
Don Robert 81 81
Sir Ian Robinson2 121 103
Total 432 380
1 Carol Arrowsmith joined the Board as a non-executive director and Chairman of the Remuneration Committee on 1 June 2014.
2 Sir Ian Robinson became the Senior Independent Director and Remuneration Committee Chairman from 10 April 2013. He stepped down as Remuneration Committee
Chairman on 1 June 2014.
Corporate governance
Dominic Blakemore4 – – 285,586 207,496 1.5 x √
Richard Cousins 1,515,815 1,527,922 801,673 913,915 2x √
Sir Roy Gardner n/a 192,678 n/a n/a 1x √
Gary Green 471,725 619,198 458,864 522,874 1.5 x √
Andrew Martin 611,764 650,000 387,414 426,421 1.5 x √
Susan Murray 12,234 13,000 n/a n/a 1x √
Don Robert 28,235 30,000 n/a n/a 1x √
Sir Ian Robinson 14,117 15,000 n/a n/a 1x √
Paul Walsh 11,411 n/a n/a n/a 1x √
1 Following the Return of Cash and associated Share Capital Consolidation of 8 July 2014 whereby 17 ordinary shares of 10 pence each were replaced by 16 new ordinary shares
of 105⁄8 pence each in the Company.
2 As a multiple of base salary or fee.
There were no changes in directors’ interests between 30 September 2014 and 26 November 2014.
REMUNERATION ADVICE
experience of its members generally, including Carol Arrowsmith, Chairman of the Committee, who was formerly a remuneration consultant
with Deloitte LLP and Susan Murray who has recent experience of being a member of the remuneration committees of other quoted companies,
including one as Chair of the committee.
97.79% of the binding votes cast were for the approval of the Remuneration Policy, with 2.21% against (with 1.58% of the total number of votes
cast abstaining). For the advisory votes cast for the Annual Remuneration Report, 99.11% were in approval of the Resolution, with 0.89% against
(with 2.67% of the total number of votes cast abstaining).
Extensive consultation with shareholder bodies and a number of large institutional investors was conducted during the year in connection with
the proposed increase to maximum awards under and other changes to the LTIP which are subject to approval by shareholders, as detailed in the
Annual Statement and the Policy Report on pages 59 to 68. The Committee welcomed the endorsement of these proposals by shareholders and
took steps, wherever practicable, to understand shareholders’ concerns when withholding their support.
At the AGM on 5 February 2015, shareholders will be invited to vote on the Policy contained in the Policy Report and on the Annual
Remuneration Report for 2013-2014.
On behalf of the Board
CAROL ARROWSMITH
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
26 November 2014
Strategic report
CONTENTS 98 Financing income, costs and related 126 Share-based payments
78 Directors’ responsibilities for (gains)/losses 130 Business combinations
consolidated and Parent Company 99 US disposals 131 Reconciliation of operating profit
financial statements 99 Tax to cash generated by operations
79 Independent auditor’s report 101 Discontinued operations 131 Reconciliation of net cash flow
102 Earnings per share to movement in net debt
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Corporate governance
104 Dividends 132 Contingent liabilities
81 Consolidated income statement
104 Goodwill 133 Capital commitments
81 Analysis of operating profit
106 Other intangible assets 133 Operating lease and concessions
82 Consolidated statement of
107 Property, plant and equipment commitments
comprehensive income
108 Interests in associates 133 Related party transactions
83 Consolidated statement of
changes in equity 108 Other investments 133 Post balance sheet events
85 Consolidated balance sheet 109 Joint ventures 134 Exchange rates
86 Consolidated cash flow statement 109 Trade and other receivables 135 Details of principal subsidiary
111 Inventories companies
86 Reconciliation of free cash
flow from continuing operations 111 Cash and cash equivalents
87 Accounting policies 112 Short term and long term borrowings
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
The Annual Report and Accounts complies with the Disclosure and STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
Transparency Rules (DTR) of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct IN RESPECT OF THE ANNUAL REPORT AND THE
Authority and the UK Corporate Governance Code in respect of the FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
requirements to produce an annual financial report. The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and
The Annual Report and Accounts is the responsibility of, and has been the Group and Parent Company financial statements in accordance
approved by, the directors. with applicable law and regulations.
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge: Company law requires the directors to prepare Group and Parent
Company financial statements for each financial year. Under that
• the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced law they are required to prepare the Group financial statements
and understandable and provides the information necessary for in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and applicable
shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model law and have elected to prepare the Parent Company financial
and strategy statements in accordance with UK Accounting Standards and
• the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in applicable law (UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, Under company law the directors must not approve the financial
liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view
the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole of the state of affairs of the Group and Parent Company and of their
• the Annual Report and Accounts includes a review of the development profit or loss for that period. In preparing each of the Group and
and performance of the business and the position of the Company and Parent Company financial statements, the directors are required to:
the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them
together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that consistently
they face • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent
On behalf of the Board • for the Group financial statements, state whether they have been
prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU
• for the Parent Company financial statements, state whether
applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject
to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Parent
Company financial statements
• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless
MARK WHITE it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and the Parent
General Counsel and Company Secretary Company will continue in business
26 November 2014
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Parent Company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the
financial position of the Parent Company and enable them to ensure
that its financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006.
They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are
reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and
to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also
responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors’ Report,
Directors’ Remuneration Report and Corporate Governance
Statement that complies with that law and those regulations. The
directors have permitted the auditor to take whatever steps and
undertake whatever inspections it considers to be appropriate for
the purpose of enabling it to give its audit opinion.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of
the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s
website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and
dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation
in other jurisdictions.
Strategic report
OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARISING FROM OUR AUDIT TAXATION
Refer to page 52 (Governance and Directors’ Report), page 89 (accounting policy)
1 OUR OPINION ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IS UNMODIFIED and page 132 (financial disclosures).
We have audited the financial statements of Compass Group PLC for the
year ended 30 September 2014 which comprise the consolidated income • The risk: Provisions for direct and indirect tax contingencies require
statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the the directors to make judgements and estimates in relation to tax
consolidated and Parent Company balance sheets, the consolidated cash risks and exposures. This is one of the key judgemental areas that
flow statement, the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the our audit is concentrated on due to the Group operating in a number
accounting policies and the related notes. In our opinion: of tax jurisdictions, the complexities of transfer pricing and other
international tax legislation, as well as the time taken for tax matters
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the to be agreed with the tax authorities.
Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 30 September 2014 • Our response: In this area our audit procedures for direct and indirect
Corporate governance
and of the Group’s profit for the year then ended; taxes included, among others, the use of internal tax specialists to
• the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in analyse and challenge the assumptions used to determine provisions
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as using our knowledge and experience of the application of international
adopted by the European Union; and local legislation by the relevant authorities and courts, and
• the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared assessing whether the approach applied by the Group is supported
in accordance with UK Accounting Standards; and by custom and practice in the industry. We have examined the
• the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the calculations prepared by the directors and validated that they are
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group supported by appropriate underlying data, and that the judgements
financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. applied are reasonable considering the maximum potential exposure
and the likelihood of a payment being required. We have inspected
2 OUR ASSESSMENT OF RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
correspondence with relevant tax authorities to identify tax risk areas
In arriving at our audit opinion above on the financial statements the
and assessed third party tax advice received to ascertain whether it
risks of material misstatement that had the greatest effect on our audit
were also held with these component auditors and all other components
that were not physically visited.
At these visits and meetings, the findings reported to the Group audit
team were discussed in more detail, and any further work required by
the Group audit team was then performed by the component auditor.
4 OUR OPINION ON OTHER MATTERS PRESCRIBED BY THE COMPANIES ACT SCOPE OF REPORT AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2006 IS UNMODIFIED As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities statement
In our opinion: set out on page 78, the directors are responsible for the preparation
• the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true
properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006; and and fair view. A description of the scope of an audit of financial
• the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ statements is provided on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at
Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are www.frc.org.uk/auditscopeukprivate. This report is made solely to the
prepared is consistent with the financial statements. Company’s members as a body and is subject to important explanations
and disclaimers regarding our responsibilities, published on our website
5 WE HAVE NOTHING TO REPORT IN RESPECT OF THE MATTERS ON WHICH WE at www.kpmg.com/uk/auditscopeukco2014a, which are incorporated
ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT BY EXCEPTION into this Report as if set out in full and should be read to provide
Under ISAs (UK and Ireland) we are required to report to you if, based an understanding of the purpose of this Report, the work we have
on the knowledge we acquired during our audit, we have identified other undertaken and the basis of our opinions.
information in the Annual Report that contains a material inconsistency
with either that knowledge or the financial statements, a material
misstatement of fact, or that is otherwise misleading.
In particular, we are required to report to you if:
• we have identified material inconsistencies between the knowledge
we acquired during our audit and the directors’ statement that they
consider that the Annual Report and financial statements taken as ANTHONY SYKES
a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the (Senior Statutory Auditor)
information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s for and on behalf of KPMG LLP, Statutory Auditor
performance, business model and strategy; or Chartered Accountants
• the Audit Committee Report does not appropriately address matters 15 Canada Square, London E14 5GL
communicated by us to the Audit Committee. 26 November 2014
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in
our opinion:
• adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent
Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received
from branches not visited by us; or
• the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the
Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement
with the accounting records and returns; or
• certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not
made; or
• we have not received all the information and explanations we require
for our audit.
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
• the Directors’ statement, set out on page 36, in relation to going
concern; and
• the part of the Corporate Governance Statement on page 49 relating
to the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the 2010 UK
Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.
We have nothing to report in respect of the above responsibilities.
Strategic report
Before
exceptional Exceptional
Total items items1 Total
2014 2013 2013 2013
Notes £m £m £m £m
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Revenue 1 17,058 17,557 – 17,557
Operating costs before goodwill impairment 2 (15,850) (16,329) (59) (16,388)
Goodwill impairment 2, 10 – – (377) (377)
Operating profit 1 1,208 1,228 (436) 792
Share of profit of associates 1, 13 9 10 – 10
Total operating profit 1 1,217 1,238 (436) 802
Profit/(loss) on disposal of US businesses 1 (1) – (1)
Corporate governance
5
Profit on disposal of interest in associates 13 13 – – –
Finance income 4 5 8 – 8
Finance costs 4 (91) (85) – (85)
Hedge accounting ineffectiveness 4 – (3) – (3)
Change in the fair value of investments 2 – – –
Profit before tax 1,147 1,157 (436) 721
Income tax expense 6 (279) (303) 16 (287)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 1 868 854 (420) 434
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Profit for the year from discontinued operations 7 3 3 – 3
CONTINUING AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Profit for the year 871 857 (420) 437
Total Total
2014 2013
Notes £m £m
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Underlying operating profit before share of profit of associates 1,236 1,255
Share of profit of associates 9 10
Underlying operating profit1 1,245 1,265
Amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition 11 (25) (25)
Acquisition transaction costs 26 (3) (3)
Adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition – 1
Shareholder information
Operating profit after costs relating to acquisitions and before exceptional items 1,217 1,238
European exceptional 2 – (59)
Goodwill impairment 2, 10 – (377)
Total operating profit 1,217 802
1 Underlying operating profit excludes European exceptional and goodwill impairment, amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition, acquisition transaction costs and
adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition.
2014 2013
Notes £m £m
Profit for the year 871 437
Other comprehensive income
Items that are not reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Remeasurement of post-employment benefit obligations – loss (148) (80)
Return on plan assets, excluding interest income – gain 23 137 119
Tax on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income 6 3 (9)
(8) 30
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Currency translation differences (103) (80)
(103) (80)
Total other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year (111) (50)
Total comprehensive income for the year 760 387
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
Equity shareholders of the Company 754 379
Non-controlling interests 6 8
Total comprehensive income for the year 760 387
Strategic report
Attributable to equity shareholders of the Company
Share Capital Non-
Share premium redemption Own Other Retained controlling
capital account reserve shares reserves earnings1 interests Total
£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2013 as previously reported 180 400 55 (1) 4,374 (2,226) 9 2,791
Past service cost recognised in accordance
with IAS 19(R) – – – – – (1) – (1)
At 1 October 2013 as restated 180 400 55 (1) 4,374 (2,227) 9 2,790
Profit for the year – – – – – 865 6 871
Other comprehensive income
Currency translation differences – – – – (103) – – (103)
Corporate governance
Remeasurement of post-employment benefit
obligations – loss – – – – – (148) – (148)
Return on plan assets, excluding interest
income – gain – – – – – 137 – 137
Tax on items relating to the components of other
comprehensive income – – – – (3) 6 – 3
Total other comprehensive income – – – – (106) (5) – (111)
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – – (106) 860 6 760
Issue of shares (for cash) 1 6 – – – – – 7
Share issue expenses – (2) – – – – – (2)
B and C shares issued through capitalisation
of share premium 235 (235) – – – – – –
1 2013 has been restated for past service cost recognised in accordance with IAS 19(R).
2 Including stamp duty and brokers’ commission.
Own shares held by the Group represent 54,941 new ordinary shares in Compass Group PLC (2013: 161,622 ordinary shares). 38,743 shares are
held by the Compass Group Employee Share Trust (ESOP) and 16,198 shares are held by the Compass Group Long Term Incentive Plan Trust
Shareholder information
(LTIPT). These shares are listed on a recognised stock exchange and their market value at 30 September 2014 was £0.5 million (2013: £1.4 million).
The nominal value held at 30 September 2014 was £5,837 (2013: £16,162).
ESOP and LTIPT are discretionary trusts for the benefit of employees and the shares held are used to satisfy some of the Group’s liabilities to
employees for share options, share bonus and long term incentive plans. All of the shares held by the ESOP and LTIPT are required to be made
available in this way.
The merger reserve arose in 2000 following the demerger from Granada Compass plc.
1 2013 has been restated for past service cost recognised in accordance with IAS 19(R).
2 Including stamp duty and brokers’ commission.
Share-based
payment Merger Revaluation Translation Total other
reserve reserve reserve reserve reserves
OTHER RESERVES £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2012 156 4,170 7 112 4,445
Other comprehensive income
Currency translation differences – – – (80) (80)
Tax on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income – – – 2 2
Total other comprehensive income – – – (78) (78)
Total comprehensive income for the year – – – (78) (78)
Fair value of share-based payments 11 – – – 11
Release of LTIP award settled by issue of new shares (5) – – – (5)
Other changes – – – 1 1
At 30 September 2013 162 4,170 7 35 4,374
Strategic report
2013
2014 Restated1
Notes £m £m
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill 10 3,565 3,620
Other intangible assets 11 1,010 886
Property, plant and equipment 12 729 714
Interests in associates 13 114 84
Other investments 14 36 41
Trade and other receivables 16 67 83
Deferred tax assets* 6 246 265
Derivative financial instruments** 20 50 63
Corporate governance
Non-current assets 5,817 5,756
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories 17 270 255
Trade and other receivables 16 2,128 2,072
Tax recoverable* 32 32
Cash and cash equivalents** 18 431 1,006
Derivative financial instruments** 20 16 7
Current assets 2,877 3,372
Total assets 8,694 9,128
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Short term borrowings** 19 (297) (104)
Derivative financial instruments** 20 (4) (3)
1 2013 has been restated for past service cost recognised in accordance with IAS 19(R).
Approved by the Board of Directors on 26 November 2014 and signed on their behalf by
Shareholder information
2014 2013
Notes £m £m
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash generated from operations 27 1,442 1,485
One-off employer contributions to post-employment benefit obligations – (72)
Interest paid (77) (71)
Interest element of finance lease rentals – (2)
Tax received 24 24
Tax paid (268) (257)
Net cash from operating activities 1,121 1,107
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of subsidiary companies and investments in associated undertakings1 26 (176) (104)
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary companies and associated undertakings – discontinued activities1 7 (1) (1)
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary companies and associated undertakings – continuing activities1 66 8
Tax on profits from sale of subsidiary companies and associated undertakings (4) –
Purchase of intangible assets 11 (206) (191)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment2 12 (263) (276)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets 22 33
Purchase of other investments 14 (2) –
Proceeds from sale of other investments 14 3 9
Dividends received from associated undertakings 13 7 6
Interest received 6 8
Net cash used in investing activities (548) (508)
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital 5 9
Purchase of own shares3 (280) (446)
Net increase in borrowings 28 597 554
Repayment of obligations under finance leases 28 (5) (9)
Return of Cash to Compass shareholders 9 (1,000) –
Equity dividends paid 9 (444) (404)
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (5) (6)
Net cash used in financing activities (1,132) (302)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents 28 (559) 297
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year 28 1,006 728
Currency translation losses on cash and cash equivalents 28 (16) (19)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year 28 431 1,006
1 Net of cash acquired or disposed and payments received or made under warranties and indemnities.
2 Includes property, plant and equipment purchased under client commitments.
3 Includes stamp duty and brokers’ commission.
2014 2013
£m £m
Net cash from operating activities of continuing operations 1,121 1,107
One-off employer contributions to post-employment benefit obligations – 72
Purchase of intangible assets (206) (191)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (263) (276)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets 22 33
Purchase of other investments (2) –
Proceeds from sale of other investments 3 9
Dividends received from associated undertakings 7 6
Interest received 6 8
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (5) (6)
Free cash flow from continuing operations 683 762
Add back: Cash restructuring costs in the year 58 72
Underlying free cash flow 741 834
Strategic report
INTRODUCTION IFRS 11 ‘Joint arrangements’ requires joint arrangements to be
The significant accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the accounted for as a joint operation or as a joint venture depending
Group’s financial statements are set out below: upon the rights and obligations of each party to the arrangement.
Proportionate consolidation for joint ventures will be eliminated and
equity accounting will be compulsory. It is anticipated that the
A ACCOUNTING CONVENTION AND BASIS OF PREPARATION application of the standard (which is effective for the Group in the year
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
ending 30 September 2015) will result in a decrease to Group revenues,
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and International
expenses, assets and liabilities but will have no impact on the Group’s net
Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations
profit or net assets. Details of the Group’s joint venture arrangements are
as adopted by the European Union that are effective for the year ended
set out in note 15.
30 September 2014. They have been prepared under the historical cost
convention as modified by the revaluation of certain financial instruments. IFRS 12 ‘Disclosure of interests in other entities’ requires enhanced
Corporate governance
disclosures of the nature, risks and financial effects associated with the
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
Group’s interests in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures.
This is discussed in the Finance Director’s statement on page 36.
IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’ (not yet endorsed
In the current financial year, the Group has adopted:
by the European Union). The standard introduces a new revenue
•• IAS 19 (revised), Employee Benefits. The expected returns on pension recognition model that recognises revenue either at a point in time or
plan assets, previously calculated based on management’s expectation over time. The model features a contract based five step analysis of
of expected returns has been replaced by a credit on the pension plan transactions to determine whether, how much and when revenue is
assets calculated at the liability discount rate. Implementation of recognised. The Group is currently assessing the impact this standard
IAS 19 (revised) has increased the net interest expense for the year by would have on its consolidated results and financial position.
£9 million (2013: £nil). The prior year adjustment of £1 million arises
IAS 27 (revised) ‘Separate financial statements’
from the treatment of past service cost which was previously spread over
the remaining service lives of the related employees, but is recognised in IAS 28 (revised) ‘Associates and joint ventures’
Corporate governance
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences
arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interest in joint
INTER-SEGMENT TRANSACTIONS
ventures, except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the
There is little or no intra-group trading between the reported business
temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference
segments. Where such trading does take place it is on similar terms and
will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
conditions to those available to third parties.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance
H REBATES AND OTHER AMOUNTS RECEIVED FROM sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that
sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset
SUPPLIERS
to be recovered.
Rebates and other amounts received from suppliers include agreed
discounts from suppliers’ list prices and value and volume related rebates. Deferred tax is calculated at the enacted or substantially enacted tax
rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled
Income from value and volume related rebates is recognised based on
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is Goodwill arising on acquisitions before the date of transition to IFRS
recognised in the income statement except where it relates to items taken has been retained at the previous UK GAAP amounts subject to being
directly to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income or equity, tested for impairment at that date. Goodwill written off to reserves under
in which case it is recognised in the consolidated statement of UK GAAP prior to 1998 has not been reinstated and is not included in
comprehensive income or equity as appropriate. determining any subsequent gain or loss on disposal.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the
period, using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted
in respect of that period by the balance sheet date.
O ASSETS HELD FOR SALE The fair value of forward currency contracts is calculated by reference
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if to current forward exchange rates for contracts with similar maturity
the carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather profiles. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined by reference
than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only to market values for similar instruments.
when the sale is highly probable, management is committed to a sale For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as either fair
plan, the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition and value hedges when they hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value
the sale is expected to be completed within one year from the date of of a recognised asset or liability; or cash flow hedges where they hedge
classification. These assets are measured at the lower of carrying value the exposure to variability in cash flows that is either attributable to
and fair value less costs to sell. a particular risk associated with a recognised asset or liability or a
forecasted transaction.
P INVENTORIES In relation to fair value hedges (interest rate swaps) which meet the
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. conditions for hedge accounting, any gain or loss from remeasuring the
Cost is calculated using either the weighted average price or the first in, hedging instrument at fair value is recognised immediately in the income
first out method as appropriate to the circumstances. Net realisable value statement. Any gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged
is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less risk is adjusted against the carrying amount of the hedged item and
applicable variable selling expenses. recognised in the income statement. Where the adjustment is to the
carrying amount of a hedged interest bearing financial instrument, the
adjustment is amortised to the net profit and loss such that it is fully
amortised by maturity.
Corporate governance
and losses are recognised immediately in the consolidated statement of
to be an effective hedge is recognised directly in equity and the comprehensive income.
ineffective portion is recognised in the income statement.
Past service cost is recognised immediately.
When the hedged firm commitment results in the recognition of an asset
or liability, then at the time the asset or liability is recognised, the The pension obligation recognised in the balance sheet represents
associated gains or losses that had previously been recognised in equity the present value of the defined benefit obligation, and as reduced by the
are included in the initial measurement of the acquisition cost and fair value of scheme assets. Any asset resulting from this calculation is
carrying amount of the asset or liability. For all other cash flow hedges, limited to the present value of available refunds and reductions in future
the gains or losses that are recognised in equity are transferred to the contributions to the plan.
income statement in the same period in which the hedged firm
commitment affects the net profit and loss, for example when the future OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS
sale actually occurs. Some Group companies provide other post-employment benefits.
The expected costs of these benefits are accrued over the period of
1 SEGMENTAL REPORTING
The management of the Group’s operations, excluding Central activities, is organised within three segments: North America, the more
developed markets of Europe & Japan and our Fast Growing & Emerging markets. These, together with Central activities, comprise the Group’s
reportable segments. These segments comprise countries which are at similar stages of development and demonstrate similar economic characteristics.
Each segment derives revenue from delivery of food and support services.
Geographical segments
Fast
North Europe & Growing &
America Japan Emerging Total
REVENUES1 £m £m £m £m
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
External revenue2 8,199 5,716 3,143 17,058
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2013
External revenue2 8,150 6,039 3,368 17,557
Sectors
Defence,
Business Healthcare Sports Offshore
& Industry Education & Seniors & Leisure & Remote Total
REVENUES1 £m £m £m £m £m £m
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
External revenue2 6,783 2,815 3,515 1,857 2,088 17,058
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2013
External revenue2 7,121 2,820 3,559 1,784 2,273 17,557
Corporate governance
Less: Amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition (12) (5) (8) – (25)
Less: Acquisition transaction costs (2) (1) – – (3)
Add: Adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition 1 – (1) – –
Operating profit before associates – continuing 653 403 217 (65) 1,208
Add: Share of profit of associates 6 3 – – 9
Total operating profit – continuing 659 406 217 (65) 1,217
Profit on disposal of US businesses 1
Profit on disposal of interest in associates 13
Finance income 5
Finance costs (91)
Hedge accounting ineffectiveness –
Change in the fair value of investments 2
1 Operating profit before associates, exceptional items and costs relating to acquisitions is the profit measure considered by the chief operating decision maker.
Shareholder information
1 Non-current assets located in the UK, the Group’s country of domicile, were £1,786 million (2013: £1,730 million). Non-current assets located in the US were £2,921 million
(2013: £2,766 million). Non-current assets located in all foreign countries in which the Group holds assets were £4,048 million (2013: £4,026 million).
2 2013 has been restated for past service cost recognised in accordance with IAS 19(R).
Corporate governance
Geographical segments
Fast
North Europe & Growing & Central
America Japan Emerging activities Total
ADDITIONS TO PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT £m £m £m £m £m
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
Total additions to property, plant and equipment1 86 110 53 1 250
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2013
Total additions to property, plant and equipment1 85 82 111 – 278
Geographical segments
Fast
Geographical segments
Fast
North Europe & Growing & Central
America Japan Emerging activities Total
DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT £m £m £m £m £m
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
Geographical segments
Fast
North Europe & Growing & Central
America Japan Emerging activities Total
OTHER NON-CASH EXPENSES £m £m £m £m £m
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
Total other non-cash expenses3 3 4 4 2 13
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2013
Total other non-cash expenses3 3 3 2 3 11
1 Includes leased assets of £2 million (2013: £2 million) and creditor for capital creditors of £1 million (2013: £2 million).
2 Including the amortisation of intangibles arising on acquisition.
Shareholder information
2 OPERATING COSTS
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS
Before
exceptional Exceptional
Total items items1 Total
2014 2013 2013 2013
OPERATING COSTS £m £m £m £m
Cost of food and materials:
Cost of inventories consumed 5,101 5,289 – 5,289
Labour costs:
Employee remuneration (note 3) 7,794 8,072 59 8,131
Overheads:
Depreciation – owned property, plant and equipment 187 176 – 176
Depreciation – leased property, plant and equipment 4 5 – 5
Amortisation – owned intangible assets 128 118 – 118
Impairment of goodwill in subsidiaries1 – – 377 377
Property lease rentals 85 88 – 88
Other occupancy rentals – minimum guaranteed rent 62 74 – 74
Other occupancy rentals – rent in excess of minimum guaranteed rent 13 13 – 13
Other asset rentals 76 88 – 88
Audit and non-audit services (see below) 6 8 – 8
Other expenses 2,366 2,371 – 2,371
Operating costs before costs relating to acquisitions 15,822 16,302 436 16,738
Amortisation – intangible assets arising on acquisition 25 25 – 25
Acquisition transaction costs 3 3 – 3
Adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition – (1) – (1)
Total continuing operations 15,850 16,329 436 16,765
1 Impairment of goodwill recorded in the consolidated income statement £nil (2013: £377 million included in ‘Other Expenses’ related to European exceptional).
2014 2013
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES1 £m £m
AUDIT SERVICES
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements 0.5 0.4
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and their associates for other services to the Group:
The audit of the Company’s subsidiaries and joint ventures pursuant to legislation 3.7 3.9
Total audit fees 4.2 4.3
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Audit related assurance 0.3 0.2
Taxation compliance 0.3 0.2
Other tax advisory 0.2 2.7
Corporate finance services 0.1 0.1
Services relating to information technology 0.8 0.1
Other services 0.2 0.2
Total non-audit fees 1.9 3.5
TOTAL AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Total audit and non-audit services 6.1 7.8
1 The 2014 fees represent fees payable to the current auditor. The 2013 comparative represents fees payable to the previous auditor.
Corporate governance
In 2013, we continued with our actions to improve the operational efficiency of our operations in Europe which we had started in 2012 and took an
additional £59 million exceptional cost.
3 EMPLOYEES
2014 2013
AVERAGE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING DIRECTORS AND PART-TIME EMPLOYEES Number Number
North America 214,511 205,969
Europe & Japan 150,847 153,915
Fast Growing & Emerging 149,360 146,815
Total continuing operations 514,718 506,699
In addition to the pension cost shown in operating costs above, there is a pensions related net charge within finance costs of £7 million
(2013: net charge of £11 million).
The remuneration of directors and key management personnel1 is set out below. Additional information on directors’ and key management
1 Key management personnel is defined as the Board of Directors and five additional individuals making up the Executive Board. In 2013, 14 individuals were included in the table
which comprised the Board of Directors and four additional individuals who were part of the Executive Board.
Shareholder information
2014 2013
FINANCE INCOME AND COSTS £m £m
FINANCE INCOME
Bank interest 5 8
Total finance income 5 8
FINANCE COSTS
Interest on bank loans and overdrafts 11 8
Interest on other loans 69 60
Finance lease interest 1 2
Interest on bank loans, overdrafts, other loans and finance leases 81 70
Unwinding of discount on provisions 3 4
Interest on net post-employment benefit obligations (note 23) 7 11
Total finance costs 91 85
ANALYSIS OF FINANCE COSTS BY DEFINED IAS 391 CATEGORY
Fair value through profit or loss (unhedged derivatives) 4 2
Derivatives in a fair value hedge relationship (28) (24)
Derivatives in a net investment hedge relationship 3 5
Other financial liabilities 102 87
Interest on bank loans, overdrafts, other loans and finance leases 81 70
Fair value through profit or loss (unwinding of discount on provisions) 3 4
Outside of the scope of IAS 39 (net pension scheme charge) 7 11
Total finance costs 91 85
The Group uses derivative financial instruments such as forward currency contracts, cross currency swaps and interest rate swaps to hedge the risks
associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. As explained in section Q of the Group’s accounting policies, such
derivative financial instruments are initially measured at fair value on the contract date, and are remeasured to fair value at subsequent reporting dates.
For derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value are taken directly to
the income statement in the period.
1 Categorised as derivatives that are designated and effective as hedging instruments carried at fair value (IAS 39).
2 Categorised as ‘fair value through profit or loss’ (IAS 39).
3 Life insurance policies used by overseas companies to meet the cost of unfunded post-employment benefit obligations included in note 23.
Corporate governance
6 TAX Before
exceptional Exceptional
Total items items Total
RECOGNISED IN THE INCOME STATEMENT: 2014 2013 2013 2013
INCOME TAX EXPENSE ON CONTINUING OPERATIONS £m £m £m £m
CURRENT TAX
Current year 271 299 (26) 273
Adjustment in respect of prior years 1 (3) – (3)
Current tax expense 272 296 (26) 270
DEFERRED TAX
Current year 10 1 10 11
The income tax expense for the year is based on the effective United Kingdom statutory rate of corporation tax for the period of 22% (2013: 23.5%).
Overseas tax is calculated at the rates prevailing in the respective jurisdictions. The impact of changes in statutory rates in the prior year related
principally to the reduction of the UK corporation tax rate from 24% to 23% from 1 April 2013, 21% from 1 April 2014, and 20% from 1 April 2015.
These changes resulted in a deferred tax charge arising from the reduction in the balance sheet carrying value of deferred tax assets to reflect the
Shareholder information
2014 2013
TAX CREDITED/(CHARGED) TO OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME £m £m
Current and deferred tax credits/(charges) on actuarial and other movements on post-employment benefits 6 (11)
Current and deferred tax (charges)/credits on foreign exchange movements (3) 2
Tax credit/(charge) on items recognised in other comprehensive income 3 (9)
2014 2013
TAX CREDITED TO EQUITY £m £m
Current and deferred tax credits in respect of share-based payments 6 6
Tax credit on items recognised in equity 6 6
Pensions Net
and post- Self-funded short term
Tax employment insurance temporary
depreciation Intangibles benefits Tax losses provisions differences Total
MOVEMENT IN NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET/(LIABILITY) £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2012 12 (176) 160 21 58 181 256
(Charge)/credit to income (4) (10) (13) (1) 6 5 (17)
(Charge)/credit to equity/other comprehensive income – – (11) 1 – 3 (7)
Business acquisitions (1) (1) – – – – (2)
Other movements 2 – – – – (3) (1)
Exchange adjustment – 4 – – – (6) (2)
At 30 September 2013 9 (183) 136 21 64 180 227
At 1 October 2013 9 (183) 136 21 64 180 227
Credit/(charge) to income 4 (7) 7 1 3 (15) (7)
(Charge)/credit to equity/other comprehensive income – – (6) – – 1 (5)
Business acquisitions – (6) – – – 1 (5)
Other movements – – – 1 – – 1
Exchange adjustment – 5 (1) (2) – (6) (4)
At 30 September 2014 13 (191) 136 21 67 161 207
Net short term temporary differences relate principally to provisions and other liabilities of overseas subsidiaries.
2014 2013
NET DEFERRED TAX BALANCE £m £m
Deferred tax assets 246 265
Deferred tax liabilities (39) (38)
Net deferred tax asset 207 227
Unrecognised deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses and other temporary differences amount to £42 million (2013: £50 million). Of the total, tax
losses of £27 million will expire at various dates between 2014 and 2022. These deferred tax assets have not been recognised as the timing of recovery
is uncertain.
Corporate governance
The Group does not recognise any deferred tax liability on temporary differences relating to potentially taxable unremitted earnings of overseas
subsidiaries totalling £448 million (2013: £401 million) because it is able to control the timing of reversal of these differences. It is probable that no
reversal will take place in the foreseeable future.
7 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
The profit for the year from discontinued operations was £3 million (2013: £3 million) relating to a release of surplus tax provisions in respect of prior
year disposals.
2014 2013
2014 2013
NET ASSETS DISPOSED AND DISPOSAL PROCEEDS £m £m
Decrease in retained liabilities1 (1) (1)
Consideration (net of costs) (1) (1)
Cash outflow from disposals (1) (1)
1 Includes the utilisation of disposal provisions of £1 million in the year ended 30 September 2014 (2013: £1 million).
2014 2013
Earnings Earnings
per share per share
Corporate governance
pence pence
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE (PENCE)
From continuing and discontinued operations 49.0 23.5
From discontinued operations (0.2) (0.2)
From continuing operations 48.8 23.3
Amortisation of intangible assets arising on acquisition (net of tax) 1.0 1.0
Acquisition transaction costs (net of tax) 0.1 0.2
Adjustment to contingent consideration on acquisition (net of tax) 0.1 (0.1)
European exceptional (net of tax) (0.4) 2.4
Goodwill impairment – 20.6
(Profit)/loss on disposal of US businesses (net of tax) (0.1) 0.1
Profit on disposal of interest in associate (net of tax) (0.7) –
Hedge accounting ineffectiveness (net of tax) – 0.1
Shareholder information
9 DIVIDENDS
A final dividend in respect of 2014 of 17.7 pence per share, £296 million in aggregate1, has been proposed, giving a total dividend in respect of 2014
of 26.5 pence per share (2013: 24.0 pence per share). The proposed final dividend is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
on 5 February 2015 and has not been included as a liability in these financial statements.
2014 2013
Dividends Dividends
per share per share
DIVIDENDS ON ORDINARY SHARES pence £m pence £m
Amounts recognised as distributions to equity shareholders during the year:
Final dividend for the prior year 16.0p 287 14.1p 259
Interim dividend for the current year 8.8p 157 8.0p 145
Total dividends 24.8p 444 22.1p 404
1 Based on the number of shares in issue at 30 September 2014 (1,674 million shares).
In addition, a Return of Cash of £1 billion was paid to shareholders in the year and is described in more detail in note 24.
10 GOODWILL
During the year the Group made a number of acquisitions. See note 26 for more details.
GOODWILL £m
COST
At 1 October 2012 4,151
Additions 39
Disposals (5)
Currency adjustment (77)
At 30 September 2013 4,108
At 1 October 2013 4,108
Additions 39
Disposals (13)
Currency adjustment (87)
At 30 September 2014 4,047
IMPAIRMENT
At 1 October 2012 114
Disposals (3)
Impairment charge recognised in the year 377
At 30 September 2013 488
At 1 October 2013 488
Currency adjustment (6)
Impairment charge recognised in the year –
At 30 September 2014 482
NET BOOK VALUE
At 30 September 2013 3,620
At 30 September 2014 3,565
Corporate governance
Total Europe & Japan 1,856 1,886
Turkey 87 98
Rest of Fast Growing & Emerging 273 283
Total 3,565 3,620
The Group tests goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that goodwill might be impaired. The recoverable
amount of a CGU is determined from value in use calculations. The key assumptions for these calculations are long term growth rates and pre-tax
discount rates and use cash flow forecasts derived from the most recent financial budgets and forecasts approved by management covering a five year
period. Budgets and Forecasts are based on expectations of future outcomes taking into account past experience, adjusted for anticipated revenue
growth, from both new business and organic growth and taking into consideration external economic factors. Cash flows beyond the five year period
are extrapolated using estimated growth rates based on local expected economic conditions and do not exceed the long term average growth rate for
that country. The pre-tax discount rates are based on the Group’s weighted average cost of capital adjusted for specific risks relating to the country in
2014 2013
Residual Pre-tax Residual Pre-tax
growth discount growth discount
GROWTH AND DISCOUNT RATES rates rates rates rates
USA 2.5% 8.5% 2.2% 11.4%
Rest of North America 2.0% 7.9% 2.0% 10.4%
UK 2.0% 8.0% 2.0% 10.6%
Rest of Europe & Japan 1.3-2.8% 7.4-16.5% 0.9%-3.1% 8.9-15.0%
Fast Growing & Emerging 1.9-7.8% 7.8-17.5% 2.1%-7.8% 9.7-18.3%
During the year ended 30 September 2013, a goodwill impairment charge of £377 million was reported in relation to the Group’s business in the UK.
The impairment charge was primarily driven by an increase in the discount rate applied as a result of increases in UK gilt rates and reflecting the
normal year end review of the long term growth expectations.
Shareholder information
1 Contract related intangible assets, other than those arising on acquisition, result from payments made by the Group in respect of client contracts and generally arise where
it is economically more efficient for a client to purchase assets used in the performance of the contract and the Group funds these purchases. The intangible assets arising
on acquisition are all contract related.
Corporate governance
At 30 September 2013 360 1,029 536 1,925
At 1 October 2013 360 1,029 536 1,925
Additions1 29 141 80 250
Disposals (17) (81) (38) (136)
Business disposals – other activities – (12) (1) (13)
Business acquisitions 2 4 1 7
Reclassified – 8 (3) 5
Currency adjustment (16) (39) (26) (81)
At 30 September 2014 358 1,050 549 1,957
DEPRECIATION
At 1 October 2012 174 632 356 1,162
Charge for the year 21 112 48 181
The net book amount of the Group’s property, plant and equipment includes assets held under finance leases as follows:
Fixtures
Land and Plant and and
buildings machinery fittings Total
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT HELD UNDER FINANCE LEASES £m £m £m £m
At 30 September 2013 7 8 1 16
At 30 September 2014 7 6 1 14
Shareholder information
1 49% ownership in Quadrant Catering Limited entitles Compass Group to 50% of voting rights.
None of these investments is held directly by the ultimate Parent Company. All joint ventures provide food and/or support services in their respective
countries of incorporation and make their accounts up to 30 September. All holdings are in the ordinary shares of the respective joint venture company.
The share of the revenue, profits, assets and liabilities of the joint ventures included in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:
Corporate governance
2014 2013
JOINT VENTURES £m £m
SHARE OF REVENUE AND PROFITS
Revenue 217 196
Expenses (195) (175)
Profit after tax for the year 22 21
SHARE OF NET ASSETS
Non-current assets 7 6
Current assets 84 78
Non-current liabilities (7) (6)
Current liabilities (47) (44)
Net assets 37 34
The share of capital commitments, contracted but not provided for, at 30 September 2014 was £nil (2013: £nil).
2014
0-3 3-6 6-12 Over 12
Not yet months months months months
due overdue overdue overdue overdue Total
TRADE RECEIVABLES £m £m £m £m £m £m
Gross trade receivables 1,474 266 33 15 33 1,821
Less: Provision for impairment of trade receivables (4) (15) (18) (10) (28) (75)
Net trade receivables 1,470 251 15 5 5 1,746
2013
0-3 3-6 6-12 Over 12
Not yet months months months months
due overdue overdue overdue overdue Total
TRADE RECEIVABLES £m £m £m £m £m £m
Gross trade receivables 1,442 312 53 22 37 1,866
Less: Provision for impairment of trade receivables (7) (10) (30) (19) (35) (101)
Net trade receivables 1,435 302 23 3 2 1,765
Movements in the provision for impairment of trade and other receivables are as follows:
2014 2013
Trade Other Total Trade Other Total
PROVISION FOR IMPAIRMENT OF TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 101 11 112 99 8 107
Charged to income statement 20 1 21 38 1 39
Credited to income statement (27) (5) (32) (15) (1) (16)
Utilised (14) – (14) (12) – (12)
Reclassified (2) 21 19 (8) 3 (5)
Currency adjustment (3) (1) (4) (1) – (1)
At 30 September 75 27 102 101 11 112
At 30 September 2014, trade receivables of £276 million (2013: £330 million) were past due but not impaired. The Group has made a provision based
on a number of factors, including past history of the debtor, and all amounts not provided for are considered to be recoverable.
Corporate governance
2014 2013
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS £m £m
Cash at bank and in hand 274 316
Short term bank deposits 157 690
Cash and cash equivalents1 431 1,006
The Group’s policy to manage the credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents is set out in note 20. The book value of cash and cash
equivalents represents the maximum credit exposure.
2014
Gross Offset Net
£m £m £m
Cash and cash equivalents 602 (171) 431
2013
Gross Offset Net
£m £m £m
Cash and cash equivalents 1,225 (219) 1,006
Bank overdrafts (239) 219 (20)
Shareholder information
Bank overdrafts principally arise as a result of uncleared transactions. Interest on bank overdrafts is at the relevant money market rates.
All amounts due under bonds, loan notes and bank facilities are shown net of unamortised issue costs. Additionally, the Group adjusts the carrying
values of the bonds and loan notes that are designated in effective fair value hedge relationships, for fair value gains and losses (based on observable
market inputs) attributable to the risk being hedged.
The Group has fixed term, fixed interest private placements denominated in US dollar and sterling.
2014 2013
Carrying Carrying
value value
LOAN NOTES Nominal value Redeemable Interest £m £m
US$ private placement $105m Oct 2013 6.45% – 65
US$ private placement $15m Nov 2013 5.67% – 9
US$ private placement $162m Oct 2015 6.72% 102 104
Sterling private placement £35m Oct 2016 7.55% 36 36
US$ private placement $250m Oct 2018 3.31% 157 159
US$ private placement $200m Sep 2020 3.09% 123 123
US$ private placement $398m Oct 2021 3.98% 245 245
US$ private placement $352m Oct 2023 4.12% 223 220
US$ private placement $300m Sep 2025 3.81% 190 186
1,076 1,147
The €500 million 2023 bond and the £250 million 2026 bond were issued during the year. The £250 million 2014 bond is recorded at its fair value to
the Group on acquisition.
2014 2013
Carrying Carrying
value value
BONDS Nominal value Redeemable Interest £m £m
Sterling Eurobond £250m Dec 2014 7.00% 251 262
Euro Eurobond €600m Feb 2019 3.13% 485 510
Euro Eurobond €500m Jan 2023 1.88% 402 –
Sterling Eurobond £250m Jun 2026 3.85% 249 –
1,387 772
2014 2013
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
value value value value
CARRYING VALUE AND FAIR VALUE OF BORROWINGS (EXCLUDING FINANCE LEASES) £m £m £m £m
Bank overdrafts 37 37 20 20
Bank loans 306 306 305 305
Corporate governance
Loan notes 1,076 1,095 1,147 1,170
£250m Eurobond Dec 2014 251 253 262 267
€600m Eurobond Feb 2019 485 517 510 534
€500m Eurobond Jan 2023 402 403 – –
£250m Eurobond Jun 2026 249 259 – –
Bonds 1,387 1,432 772 801
Borrowings (excluding finance leases) 2,806 2,870 2,244 2,296
2014 2013
Present Present
Gross value Gross value
GROSS AND PRESENT VALUE OF FINANCE LEASE LIABILITIES £m £m £m £m
Finance lease payments falling due:
2014 2013
Finance Finance
Borrowings leases Total Borrowings leases Total
BORROWINGS BY CURRENCY £m £m £m £m £m £m
Sterling 835 – 835 599 – 599
US Dollar 1,040 1 1,041 1,111 2 1,113
Euro 904 13 917 520 13 533
The Group had the following undrawn committed facilities available at 30 September, in respect of which all conditions precedent had then been met:
2014 2013
UNDRAWN COMMITTED FACILITIES £m £m
Expiring between 1 and 5 years 1,000 700
Shareholder information
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
The Group continues to manage its interest rate and foreign currency exposure in accordance with the policies set out below. The Group’s financial
instruments comprise cash, borrowings, receivables and payables that are used to finance the Group’s operations. The Group also uses derivatives,
principally interest rate swaps, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps, to manage interest rate and currency risks arising from the
Group’s operations. The Group does not trade in financial instruments. The Group’s treasury policies are designed to mitigate the impact of
fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates and to manage the Group’s financial risks. The Board approves any changes to the policies.
LIQUIDITY RISK
The Group finances its borrowings from a number of sources including the bank, the public and the private placement markets. The Group has
developed long term relationships with a number of financial counterparties with the balance sheet strength and credit quality to provide credit
facilities as required. The Group seeks to avoid a concentration of debt maturities in any one period to spread its refinancing risk.
2014 2013
Against Against
Against Against Japanese Against Against Japanese
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: US Dollar Euro Yen US Dollar Euro Yen
IMPACT OF STERLING STRENGTHENING BY 10% £m £m £m £m £m £m
(Decrease)/increase in profit for the year (after tax) (2) 3 – 1 4 –
Increase in total equity 150 21 12 80 17 5
2013
Japanese
Corporate governance
Sterling US Dollar Euro Yen Other Total
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS £m £m £m £m £m £m
Increase in interest rate +1% +1% +1% +1% +1% n/a
Floating rate exposure – cash/(debt) 48 (109) (43) (53) 44 (113)
Decrease in profit for the year (after tax) – (1) – – – (1)
These changes are the result of the exposure to interest rates from the Group’s floating rate cash and cash equivalents and debt. The sensitivity gains
and losses given above may vary because cash flows vary throughout the year and interest rate and currency hedging may be implemented after the
year end date in order to comply with the treasury policies outlined above.
CREDIT RISK
The Group’s policy is to minimise its exposure to credit risk from the failure of any single financial counterparty by spreading its risk across a portfolio
of financial counterparties and managing the aggregate exposure to each against certain pre-agreed limits. Exposure to counterparty credit risk
HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The following section describes the derivative financial instruments the Group uses to apply the interest rate and foreign currency hedging strategies
described above.
2014 2013
Current Non-current Current Non-current Current Non-current Current Non-current
assets assets liabilities liabilities assets assets liabilities liabilities
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Interest rate swaps:
Fair value hedges1 11 34 – – 2 41 – (1)
Not in a hedging relationship2 – – (1) – – – (1) –
Other derivatives:
Forward currency contracts and
cross currency swaps 4 16 (3) (1) 5 21 (2) –
Others 1 – – – – 1 – –
Total 16 50 (4) (1) 7 63 (3) (1)
1 Derivatives that are designated and effective as hedging instruments carried at fair value (IAS 39).
2 Derivatives carried at ‘fair value through profit or loss’ (IAS 39).
2014 2013
Fair value Cash flow Fair value Cash flow
swaps swaps swaps swaps
NOTIONAL AMOUNT OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS BY CURRENCY £m £m £m £m
Sterling 220 – 220 –
US Dollar 615 472 680 395
Euro 741 27 393 38
Japanese Yen – 75 – 45
Other – 248 – 124
Total 1,576 822 1,293 602
2014 2013
Forward Effective Forward Effective
Gross currency currency of Gross currency currency of
EFFECTIVE CURRENCY DENOMINATION OF BORROWINGS borrowings contracts1 borrowings borrowings contracts1 borrowings
AFTER THE EFFECT OF DERIVATIVES £m £m £m £m £m £m
Sterling 835 (600) 235 599 (28) 571
US Dollar 1,041 623 1,664 1,113 (75) 1,038
Euro 917 (624) 293 533 (251) 282
Japanese Yen – 128 128 – 55 55
Other 30 482 512 20 275 295
Total 2,823 9 2,832 2,265 (24) 2,241
Corporate governance
Total fixed interest 250 100 35 – 615 1,406 2,406
Cash flow swaps (fixed leg) 278 442 102 – – – 822
Fair value swaps (fixed leg) (200) (59) (20) – (505) (792) (1,576)
Fixed interest liability 328 483 117 – 110 614 1,652
FLOATING INTEREST
Bank loans 4 52 250 – – – 306
Overdrafts 37 – – – – – 37
Total floating interest 41 52 250 – – – 343
Cash flow swaps (floating leg) (278) (442) (102) – – – (822)
Fair value swaps (floating leg) 200 59 20 – 505 792 1,576
Floating interest (asset)/liability (37) (331) 168 – 505 792 1,097
OTHER
Finance lease obligations 5 3 2 2 1 4 17
1 Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are reported via the currency translation gains/(losses) caption in note 28).
2 Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are reported via the other non-cash movements caption in note 28).
2014
Less than Between 1 Between 2 Between 3 Between 4 Over
1 year and 2 years and 3 years and 4 years and 5 years 5 years Total
PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST MATURITY ANALYSIS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
1 Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are reported via the currency translation gains/(losses) caption in note 28).
2 Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are reported via the other non-cash movements caption in note 28).
2013
Less than Between 1 Between 2 Between 3 Between 4 Over
1 year and 2 years and 3 years and 4 years and 5 years 5 years Total
PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST MATURITY ANALYSIS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Gross debt 100 249 139 286 1 1,424 2,199
Less: Overdrafts (20) – – – – – (20)
Less: Fees and premiums capitalised on issue (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (3) (9)
Less: Other non-cash items 4 8 13 1 – 1 27
Repayment of principal 82 256 151 286 – 1,422 2,197
Interest cash flows on debt and derivatives (settled net) 88 86 65 59 52 174 524
Settlement of forward currency contracts and cross
currency swaps – payable leg (140) – – – – – (140)
Settlement of forward currency contracts and cross
currency swaps – receivable leg 142 – – – – – 142
Repayment of principal and interest 172 342 216 345 52 1,596 2,723
Corporate governance
Social security and other taxes 280 – 280 279 – 279
Other payables 185 23 208 164 22 186
Deferred consideration on acquisitions1 13 21 34 17 6 23
Accruals2 1,041 34 1,075 990 47 1,037
Deferred income 257 – 257 248 – 248
Amounts owed to associates3 6 – 6 7 – 7
Trade and other payables 3,139 78 3,217 3,054 75 3,129
The directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates to their fair value. The current trade and other payables
are payable on demand.
22 PROVISIONS Provisions in
respect of
discontinued
and disposed Onerous Legal and Re-
Insurance businesses contracts other claims organisation Other Total
PROVISIONS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2012 217 52 79 105 94 56 603
Reclassified1 – (4) 4 1 (1) (4) (4)
Expenditure in the year (11) (1) (31) (5) (69) (18) (135)
Charged to income statement 23 – 4 10 46 12 95
Credited to income statement – – (4) (16) (6) (4) (30)
1 Including items reclassified between accrued liabilities and other balance sheet captions.
2014 2013
PROVISIONS £m £m
Shareholder information
The provision for insurance relates to the potential settlements in respect of claims under self-funded insurance schemes, primarily workers’
compensation schemes in the US, and is essentially long term in nature.
Provisions in respect of discontinued and disposed of businesses relate to estimated amounts payable in connection with onerous contracts and claims
arising from disposals. The final amount payable remains uncertain as, at the date of approval of these financial statements, there remains a further
period during which claims may be received. The timing of any settlement will depend upon the nature and extent of claims received.
22 PROVISIONS CONTINUED
Provisions for onerous contracts represent the liabilities in respect of short term and long term leases on unoccupied properties and other contracts
lasting under five years.
Provisions for legal and other claims relate principally to provisions for the estimated cost of litigation and other sundry claims. The timing of the
settlement of these claims is uncertain.
Provisions for reorganisation include provision for redundancy costs and these are expected to be utilised over the next two years.
Other provisions include environmental provisions. These are in respect of potential liabilities relating to the Group’s responsibility for maintaining
its operating sites in accordance with statutory requirements and the Group’s aim to have a low impact on the environment. These provisions are
expected to be utilised as operating sites are disposed of or as environmental matters are resolved.
Provisions are discounted to present value where the effect is material using the Group’s weighted average cost of capital.
UK SCHEMES
Within the UK there are now three main arrangements. The Compass Retirement Income Savings Plan (CRISP), the Compass Group Pension Plan
(the Plan) and the Company’s stakeholder pension arrangement.
CRISP was launched on 1 February 2003. This has been the main vehicle for pension provision for new joiners in the UK since that date but existing
members of the Plan had continued to accrue benefits under those arrangements up until 5 April 2010. CRISP is a contracted-in money purchase
arrangement whereby the Group will match employee contributions up to 6% of pay (minimum 3%). Within CRISP a new defined contribution
section was established from April 2006 known as the Compass Higher Income Plan (CHIP). Senior employees who contribute to CRISP will receive
an additional employer only contribution into CHIP. The amount of contribution and eligibility for CHIP are decided annually at the Company’s
discretion. The payment towards CHIP may be taken in part, or in whole, as a cash supplement instead of a pension contribution.
CRISP has a Corporate Trustee. The Chairman, Nigel Palmer, is a current employee of the Group and was appointed a Trustee Director on
30 May 2013. The other five Trustee Directors are UK based employees of the Group, two of whom have been nominated by CRISP members.
At the date of this Report, there is a vacancy for one further Member-Nominated Trustee Director.
The Plan is a defined benefit arrangement. Those UK employees who transfer from the public sector under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection
of Employment) Regulations 2006 are eligible to join the Plan, which has otherwise been closed to new entrants since 2003. Such transferees enter into
the GAD sections of the Plan and are known as ‘GAD members’. The Plan closed to future accrual for all existing members, other than GAD
members, on 5 April 2010. The affected members were offered membership of CRISP from 6 April 2010.
The Plan is operated on a pre-funded basis. The funding policy is to contribute such variable amounts, on the advice of the actuary, as achieves a
100% funding level on a projected salary basis. The actuarial assessments covering expense and contributions are carried out by independent qualified
actuaries. A formal actuarial valuation of the Plan is carried out every three years. The most recent valuation of the Plan took place as at 5 April 2013.
At the valuation date, the total market value of the assets of the Plan was £1,808 million which represented 92% of the benefits that had accrued to
members after allowing for expected future increases in earnings.
By agreement with the Trustees, the Company has agreed to eliminate the 5 April 2013 deficit over a period of six years and three months
to 31 December 2019 through monthly payments totalling £26 million per annum. The next triennial valuation is due to be completed as at
5 April 2016. The Plan is reappraised annually by independent actuaries in accordance with IAS 19(R) ‘Employee Benefits’ requirements.
The Plan has a Corporate Trustee. The Chairman, Peter Morriss to 11 October 2013 and Phillip Whittome from 11 October 2013, and one other
Trustee Director are independent. There are a further five Trustee Directors who are either UK based employees or former employees of the Group,
three of whom have been nominated by Plan members.
The Company became subject to the Pensions Automatic Enrolment Regulations for its workforce in the UK on 1 November 2012 but, in accordance
with the Regulations, deferred its staging date for automatic enrolment of eligible employees until 2 January 2013 in order to ensure that adequate
systems were in place and employees were not impacted over the Christmas period. Both the Plan and CRISP are compliant arrangements under
these Regulations and have been registered as such.
Employees who are not already in one of these registered compliant arrangements have been automatically enrolled into the National Employment
Savings Trust (NEST). The decision to appoint NEST as the Company’s partner for automatic enrolment was made following a comprehensive
selection process and the Company considers that NEST provides the right type of service, communication material and investment choice for our
employees and that it has the capabilities to support a company as large and diverse as Compass.
Corporate governance
for as defined contribution plans, as the information provided by the plan administrators is insufficient for them to be accounted for as defined benefit
plans. The Group made total contributions of £10 million in the year (2013: £10 million) to these arrangements.
The mortality assumptions used to value the UK pension schemes are derived from the S1NA generational mortality tables with improvements in line
with the projection model prepared by the Continuous Mortality Investigation of the UK actuarial profession, with no rating for males and +0.6 year
age adjustment for females, with a long term underpin of 1.25%. These mortality assumptions take account of experience to date, and assumptions for
further improvements in the life expectancy of scheme members. The Group estimates the average duration of the UK Plan’s liabilities to be 18 years
(2013: 18 years).
Examples of the resulting life expectancies are as follows:
2014 2013
LIFE EXPECTANCY AT AGE 65 Male Female Male Female
Member aged 65 in 2014 (2013) 22.5 24.4 22.4 24.4
Member aged 65 in 2039 (2038) 24.8 26.9 24.7 26.8
The other demographic assumptions have been set having regard to the latest trends in scheme experience and other relevant data. The assumptions
are reviewed and updated as necessary as part of the periodic actuarial valuation of pension schemes.
Shareholder information
For the overseas schemes, regionally appropriate assumptions have been used where recommended by local actuaries. The mortality assumptions used
to value USA schemes are derived from the RP2000 combined healthy table, generational BB2D scale. Examples of the resulting life expectancies are
as follows:
2014 2013
LIFE EXPECTANCY AT AGE 65 Male Female Male Female
Member aged 65 in 2014 (2013) 20.9 23.3 19.2 21.0
Member aged 65 in 2039 (2038) 22.9 25.5 21.0 22.1
ASSUMPTION Change in assumption Impact on scheme deficit 2014 Impact on scheme deficit 2013
UK
Discount rate Increase by 0.5% Decrease by £170 million Decrease by £159 million
Decrease by 0.5% Increase by £181 million Increase by £169 million
Inflation Increase by 0.5% Increase by £104 million Increase by £98 million
Decrease by 0.5% Decrease by £99 million Decrease by £94 million
CPI Inflation Increase by 0.5% Increase by £29 million Increase by £27 million
Decrease by 0.5% Decrease by £29 million Decrease by £27 million
Life expectations from age 65 Increase by 1 year Increase by £55 million Increase by £49 million
Life expectations – annual improvement rate Increase by 0.25% per annum Increase by £26 million Increase by £22 million
USA AND OTHER
Discount rate Increase by 0.5% Decrease by £18 million Decrease by £19 million
Decrease by 0.5% Increase by £19 million Increase by £20 million
Inflation Increase by 0.5% Increase by £4 million Increase by £5 million
Decrease by 0.5% Decrease by £4 million Decrease by £5 million
Life expectations from age 65 Increase by 1 year Increase by £8 million Increase by £6 million
The sensitivities above consider the impact of the single change shown, with the other assumptions assumed to be unchanged. The sensitivity analyses
have been determined based on a method that extrapolates the impact on the defined benefit obligations as a result of reasonable changes in key
assumptions occurring at the end of the reporting period. In practice, changes in one assumption may be accompanied by offsetting changes in
another assumption, although this is not always the case. The impact of a change in the UK inflation rate shown above includes the impact of a
change in both the RPI and CPI inflation rates.
The Group’s net pension deficit is the difference between the schemes’ liabilities and the schemes’ assets. Changes in the assumptions may occur at the
same time as changes in the market value of scheme assets. These may or may not offset the changes in assumptions. For example, a fall in interest
rates will increase the schemes’ liabilities but may also trigger an offsetting increase in the market value of certain assets so there is no effect on the
Group’s liability.
2014 2013
Corporate governance
MOVEMENTS IN THE FAIR VALUE UK USA Other Total UK USA Other Total
OF PLAN ASSETS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 1,772 250 127 2,149 1,546 224 129 1,899
Currency adjustment – – (6) (6) – (1) (2) (3)
Interest income on plan assets 78 10 3 91 67 14 5 86
Return on plan assets, excluding interest
income 122 14 1 137 109 10 – 119
Employee contributions – 15 2 17 – 14 3 17
Employer contributions 30 15 15 60 102 16 28 146
Benefits paid (58) (24) (14) (96) (52) (20) (23) (95)
Administration expenses paid from plan
assets – (1) – (1) – – – –
Disposals and plan settlements – – (44) (44) – (7) (13) (20)
2014 2013
MOVEMENT IN THE PRESENT VALUE OF DEFINED UK USA Other Total UK USA Other Total
BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 1,790 352 216 2,358 1,678 342 241 2,261
Currency adjustment – – (13) (13) – (1) (1) (2)
Current service cost 2 7 9 18 2 7 12 21
Past service cost – 1 (5) (4) – – – –
Interest expense on benefit obligations 78 14 6 98 74 16 7 97
Remeasurements – demographic assumptions 12 9 2 23 (44) – 6 (38)
Remeasurements – financial assumptions 96 15 11 122 119 – (13) 106
Remeasurements – experience – 1 2 3 13 1 (2) 12
Employee contributions – 15 2 17 – 14 3 17
2014 2013
PRESENT VALUE OF DEFINED UK USA Other Total UK USA Other Total
BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Funded obligations 1,878 301 107 2,286 1,750 273 150 2,173
Unfunded obligations 42 89 66 197 40 79 66 185
Total obligations 1,920 390 173 2,483 1,790 352 216 2,358
2014 2013
POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS RECOGNISED IN THE BALANCE SHEET £m £m
Present value of defined benefit obligations1 2,483 2,358
Fair value of plan assets (2,307) (2,149)
Post-employment benefit obligations recognised in the balance sheet 176 209
Shareholder information
1 As disclosed in section A, Accounting convention and basis of preparation, in the Accounting Policies, a past service cost of £1 million has been recognised in the balance sheet
as at 30 September 2013.
Certain Group companies have taken out life insurance policies and invested in mutual funds which will be used to meet unfunded pension
obligations. The current value of these policies and other assets, £27 million (2013: £24 million), may not be offset against pension obligations under
IAS 19(R) and is reported within note 14.
2014 2013
UK USA Other Total UK USA Other Total
£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Current service cost 2 7 9 18 2 7 12 21
Past service cost – 1 (5) (4) – – – –
Charged to operating expenses 2 8 4 14 2 7 12 21
Interest expense on benefit obligations 78 14 6 98 74 16 7 97
Interest income on plan assets (78) (10) (3) (91) (67) (14) (5) (86)
Charged to finance costs – 4 3 7 7 2 2 11
Total charged in the consolidated income
statement 2 12 7 21 9 9 14 32
The Group made total contributions to defined benefit schemes of £60 million in the year (2013: £146 million), including exceptional advance
payments of £nil (2013: £72 million) and expects to make regular ongoing contributions to these schemes of £65 million in 2015.
Corporate governance
At 30 September 178 180
The performance and vesting conditions are described in more detail in note 25.
2014 2013
Weighted Weighted
average average
Number of exercise Number of exercise
share price share price
EXECUTIVE AND MANAGEMENT SHARE OPTION PLANS options pence options pence
Outstanding at 1 October 21,107,790 577.50 21,774,335 469.17
Granted 128,800 922.00 4,650,560 869.56
Exercised (3,338,288) 397.11 (3,419,777) 342.63
Lapsed (following net settlement) (1,604,825) 570.53 (860,654) 557.50
Expired (381,300) 342.91 (323,450) 317.20
Lapsed (615,507) 658.71 (713,224) 443.15
Outstanding at 30 September 15,296,670 623.07 21,107,790 577.50
Exercisable at 30 September 6,118,190 438.93 7,632,895 371.03
2014 2013
Weighted Weighted
average average
Number of exercise Number of exercise
share price share price
UK SHARESAVE PLAN options pence options pence
Outstanding at 1 October – – 12,965 179.20
Lapsed – – (12,965) 179.20
Outstanding at 30 September – – – –
Corporate governance
made for the presence of performance conditions and the possibility of early exercise. In addition, a Monte Carlo simulation model was used to estimate
the probability of performance conditions being met. The inputs to the option pricing models are reassessed for each grant.
The expected volatility is calculated with reference to weekly movements in the Compass share price over the three years prior to the grant date.
The following assumptions were used in calculating the fair value of options granted under the CSOP 2010:
ASSUMPTIONS – OPTIONS 2014 2013
Expected volatility 15.3% 17.4%
Risk free interest rate 1.8% 1.0%
Dividend yield 2.6% 2.5%
Expected life 6.0 years 6.0 years
Weighted average share price at date of grant 921.00p 875.49p
Weighted average option exercise price 922.00p 869.56p
Target
Threshold Maximum
EXECUTIVE AND MANAGEMENT AFCF AFCF
SHARE OPTION PLANS Performance period £m % of award £m % of award
Granted on:
25 November 2011 and 17 May 2012 1 October 2011 – 30 September 2014 2,360 25% 2,478 100%
22 November 2012 and 16 May 2013 1 October 2012 – 30 September 2015 2,246 0% 2,482 100%
29 November 2013 1 October 2013 – 30 September 2016 2,423 0% 2,679 100%
Vesting of a proportion of LTIP awards is dependent on the Group’s total shareholder return (TSR) performance relative to a comparator group of
non-financial companies included within the FTSE 100 Index. This performance condition is treated as a market based condition for valuation
purposes and an assessment of the vesting probability is built into the grant date fair value calculations. This assessment was calculated using a Monte
Carlo simulation option pricing model.
Vesting of a proportion of LTIP awards is dependent on the achievement of the cumulative three year AFCF target. 100% of that element of the award
will vest if the maximum AFCF target is met, and a proportion of the award will vest if the threshold AFCF target is met, as set out in the table below.
Awards vest on a straight line basis between these two points.
Target
Threshold Maximum
AFCF AFCF
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS Performance period £m % of award £m % of award
Awarded during the year commencing:
1 October 2011 1 October 2011 – 30 September 2014 2,360 25% 2,478 100%
1 October 2012 1 October 2012 – 30 September 2015 2,246 0% 2,482 100%
1 October 2013 1 October 2013 – 30 September 2016 2,423 0% 2,679 100%
Vesting of a proportion of LTIP awards is dependent on the achievement of the ROCE improvement target over the performance period. 100% of that
element of the award will vest if the maximum ROCE improvement target is met, and a proportion of the award will vest if the threshold growth
target is met, as set out in the table below. Awards vest on a straight line basis between these two points.
Target
Threshold Maximum
ROCE ROCE
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS Performance period % % of award % % of award
Awarded year commencing:
1 October 2012 1 October 2012 – 30 September 2015 17.9% 25% 19.6% 100%
1 October 2013 1 October 2013 – 30 September 2016 18.4% 0% 20.1% 100%
The fair value of awards subject to AFCF and ROCE improvement performance targets was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The vesting probability of each element has been assessed based on a simulation model of the AFCF and ROCE improvement forecasts. The AFCF
performance targets relating to LTIP awards made in the years commencing 1 October 2009 and 1 October 2010 were met in full and the maximum
number of shares available were released to the participants.
The element of awards made in the year commencing 1 October 2009 dependent upon TSR performance targets also vested in full and the maximum
number of shares available were released to participants as the Company’s TSR performance was within the top quartile of the comparator group. For
awards made in the year commencing 1 October 2010, the Company’s TSR performance fell just outside the top quartile of the comparator group and
as a result 96.1% of that element of the award vested. The weighted average share price at the date of release for LTIP awards released during 2014
was 938.50 pence (2013: 720.51 pence).
The LTIP awards outstanding at the end of the year have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.5 years (2013: 1.1 years).
For the year ended 30 September 2014, LTIP awards were made on 29 November 2013 and 9 July 2014 for which the estimated fair value was
582.03 pence and 653.22 pence respectively. For year ended 30 September 2013, LTIP awards were made on 12 February 2013 and 18 February 2013
for which the estimated fair value was 601.42 pence and 608.28 pence respectively. These awards were all made under the terms of the 2010 LTIP.
The inputs to the option pricing model are reassessed for each award. The following assumptions were used in calculating the fair value of LTIP
awards made during the year:
ASSUMPTIONS – LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS 2014 2013
Expected volatility 15.5% 19.4%
Risk free interest rate 0.7% 0.5%
Dividend yield 2.4% 2.8%
Expected life 2.9 years 2.6 years
Weighted average share price at date of grant 986.23p 775.13p
Corporate governance
Vested and available for release at 30 September – –
2014 2013
Number Number
RESTRICTED SHARES (PHANTOM AWARDS) of shares of shares
Outstanding at 1 October 52,460 52,460
Outstanding at 30 September 52,460 52,460
Vested and available for release at 30 September – –
The phantom restricted shares were awarded on 25 November 2011 and will vest on 25 November 2014 subject to the achievement of a period of
service performance conditions. These awards are cash-settled and the fair value is reassessed at each balance sheet date. The carrying amount as
at 30 September 2014 is £0.5 million (2013: £0.3 million).
The weighted average share price at the date of release for restricted share awards released during 2014 was 997.93 pence (2013: 806.36 pence).
The fair value of bonus shares awarded is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model; however, no new awards were made in either 2014 or 2013.
The weighted average share price at the date of release for share bonus awards released during 2014 was 966.00 pence. No awards were released during
2013. The share bonus awards have all vested, although certain executives have elected to defer taking their entitlements for a further period of up to
3.3 years (2013: 4.3 years), the weighted average deferral period being 1.3 years (2013: 1.8 years).
Corporate governance
Decrease in provisions (64) (71)
Decrease in post-employment benefit obligations (45) (54)
Share-based payments – charged to profits 13 12
Operating cash flows before movement in working capital 1,458 1,383
(Increase)/decrease in inventories (18) 1
(Increase)/decrease in receivables (154) 3
Increase in payables 156 98
Cash generated by continuing operations 1,442 1,485
Gross debt
Total
Cash and Bank and overdrafts Derivative Total
cash Bank other and Finance financial gross Net
equivalents overdrafts borrowings borrowings leases instruments debt debt
NET DEBT £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2012 728 (58) (1,699) (1,757) (28) 84 (1,701) (973)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 297 – – – – – – 297
Cash inflow from issue of bonds – – (563) (563) – – (563) (563)
Cash outflow/(inflow) from other changes in
gross debt – 40 11 51 – (42) 9 9
Cash outflow from repayment of obligations
under finance leases – – – – 9 – 9 9
1 Excludes bonds, guarantees and indemnities in respect of self-insurance liabilities, post-employment obligations and borrowings (including finance and operating leases)
recorded on the balance sheet or disclosed in note 31.
OUTCOME
Although it is not possible to predict the outcome or quantify the financial effect of these proceedings, or any claim against the Group related thereto,
in the opinion of the directors, any uninsured losses resulting from the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the financial
position of the Group. The timing of the settlement of these proceedings or claims is uncertain.
Corporate governance
Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases and concessions agreements are as follows:
2014 2013
Operating leases Other Operating leases Other
Land and Other occupancy Land and Other occupancy
buildings assets rentals buildings assets rentals
OPERATING LEASE AND CONCESSIONS COMMITMENTS £m £m £m £m £m £m
Falling due within 1 year 53 46 55 49 46 55
Falling due between 2 and 5 years 141 63 74 128 61 73
Falling due in more than 5 years 76 6 53 84 6 44
Total 270 115 182 261 113 172
SUBSIDIARIES
Transactions between the ultimate Parent Company and its subsidiaries, and between subsidiaries, have been eliminated on consolidation.
JOINT VENTURES
There were no significant transactions between joint ventures or joint venture partners and the rest of the Group during the year.
ASSOCIATES
The balances with associated undertakings are shown in note 21. There were no significant transactions with associated undertakings during the year.
1 Average rates are used to translate the income statement and cash flow statement. Closing rates are used to translate the balance sheet. Only the most significant currencies
are shown.
Corporate governance
Crothall Services Group USA Support services to the healthcare market
Flik International Corp USA Fine dining facilities
Foodbuy LLC USA Purchasing services in North America
Levy Restaurants LP USA Fine dining and food service at sports and entertainment facilities
Morrison Management Specialists, Inc. USA Food service to the healthcare and senior living market
Restaurant Associates Corp USA Fine dining facilities
Wolfgang Puck Catering & Events, LLC (90%) USA Fine dining facilities
EUROPE & JAPAN
Compass Contract Services (UK) Ltd England & Wales Food and support services
Compass Group Holdings PLC England & Wales Holding company and corporate activities
Compass Group, UK & Ireland Ltd England & Wales Holding company
Compass Group Procurement Ltd England & Wales Purchasing services throughout the world
Compass Purchasing Ltd England & Wales Purchasing services in the UK and Ireland
Strategic report
2014 2013
COMPASS GROUP PLC Notes £m £m
FIXED ASSETS
Investments 2 985 976
CURRENT ASSETS
Debtors: Amounts falling due within one year 3 9,830 8,992
Debtors: Amounts falling due after more than one year 3 50 62
Cash at bank and in hand 118 672
Current assets 9,998 9,726
CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year 4 (6,492) (6,425)
Corporate governance
NET CURRENT ASSETS
Net current assets 3,506 3,301
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT LIABILITIES
Total assets less current liabilities 4,491 4,277
CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE AFTER MORE THAN ONE YEAR
Creditors: Amounts falling due after more than one year 4 (2,513) (2,142)
Provisions for liabilities and charges 5 (28) (28)
NET ASSETS
Net assets 1,950 2,107
CAPITAL AND RESERVES
Share capital 8, 9 178 180
Approved by the Board of Directors on 26 November 2014 and signed on their behalf by
RICHARD COUSINS, Director
DOMINIC BLAKEMORE, Director
Strategic report
1 PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT DISCLOSURES
The Company profit on ordinary activities after tax was £1,549 million (2013: £892 million).
The fee for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements was £0.5 million (2013: £0.4 million).
The Company had no direct employees in the course of the year (2013: none).
COST
Corporate governance
At 1 October 977 969
Additions – –
Share-based payments to employees of subsidiaries 15 13
Recharged to subsidiaries during the year (6) (5)
At 30 September 986 977
PROVISIONS
At 1 October 1 1
Additions – –
At 30 September 1 1
NET BOOK VALUE
At 30 September 985 976
3 DEBTORS
2014 2013
Falling due Falling due Falling due Falling due
within after more within after more
1 year than 1 year Total 1 year than 1 year Total
DEBTORS £m £m £m £m £m £m
Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings 9,813 – 9,813 8,984 – 8,984
Other debtors 1 – 1 – – –
Derivative financial instruments (note 7) 16 50 66 7 62 69
Current taxation – – – 1 – 1
Total 9,830 50 9,880 8,992 62 9,054
The deferred taxation asset arises on certain derivative financial instruments and will be recovered no later than the maturity dates of these instruments.
Shareholder information
4 CREDITORS
2014 2013
Falling due Falling due Falling due Falling due
within after more within after more
1 year than 1 year Total 1 year than 1 year Total
CREDITORS £m £m £m £m £m £m
Bank overdrafts 172 – 172 229 – 229
Bank loans – 300 300 – 298 298
Bank overdrafts and loans (note 6) 172 300 472 229 298 527
Loan notes – 1,076 1,076 74 1,074 1,148
Bonds 251 1,136 1,387 – 769 769
Loan notes and bonds (note 6) 251 2,212 2,463 74 1,843 1,917
Derivative financial instruments (note 7) 4 1 5 3 1 4
Accruals and deferred income 60 – 60 50 – 50
Current taxation 3 – 3 – – –
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings 6,002 – 6,002 6,069 – 6,069
Total 6,492 2,513 9,005 6,425 2,142 8,567
The Company has fixed term, fixed interest private placements denominated in US dollar and sterling.
2014 2013
Carrying Carrying
value value
LOAN NOTES Nominal value Redeemable Interest £m £m
US$ private placement $105m Oct 2013 6.45% – 65
US$ private placement $15m Nov 2013 5.67% – 9
US$ private placement $162m Oct 2015 6.72% 102 104
Sterling private placement £35m Oct 2016 7.55% 36 36
US$ private placement $250m Oct 2018 3.31% 157 159
US$ private placement $200m Sep 2020 3.09% 123 123
US$ private placement $398m Oct 2021 3.98% 245 245
US$ private placement $352m Oct 2023 4.12% 223 220
US$ private placement $300m Sep 2025 3.81% 190 186
Total 1,076 1,147
The Company also has sterling and euro denominated Eurobonds. The €500 million 2023 bond and the £250 million 2026 bond were issued during
the year. .
2014 2013
Carrying Carrying
value value
BONDS Nominal value Redeemable Interest £m £m
Sterling Eurobond £250m Dec 2014 7.00% 251 259
Euro Eurobond €600m Feb 2019 3.13% 485 –
Euro Eurobond €500m Jan 2023 1.88% 402 –
Sterling Eurobond £250m Jun 2026 3.85% 249 510
Total 1,387 769
Provisions for legal and other claims relates to provisions for the estimated cost of litigation and other sundry claims. The timing of the settlement of
Corporate governance
these claims is uncertain.
2014 2013
Bank Bank
overdrafts Loan notes overdrafts Loan notes
and loans and bonds Other1 and loans and bonds Other1
(note 4) (note 4) (note 7) Total (note 4) (note 4) (note 7) Total
MATURITY £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
1 Other includes the debtor and creditor amounts associated with derivative financial instruments (note 7).
8 SHARE CAPITAL
Details of the share capital, share option schemes and share-based payments of Compass Group PLC are shown in notes 24 and 25 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Shareholder information
Details regarding certain contingent liabilities which involve the Company are set out in note 29 to the consolidated financial statements.
Strategic report
CONTENTS
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
144 Shareholder information
146 Notice of Annual General Meeting
Corporate governance
Financial statements
Parent Company financial statements
Shareholder information
Corporate governance
Advice on protecting your Compass Group PLC shares:
On 11 June 2014, shareholders approved a Return of Cash of
•• Keep all Compass correspondence in a safe place, or destroy 56 pence per Existing Ordinary Share, which resulted in
correspondence by shredding approximately £1 billion being returned through the issue of one
•• When changing address, inform the registrar, Capita Asset Services. B or C Share to shareholders for each Existing Ordinary Share held
If a letter from Capita Asset Services is received regarding a change at 6.00pm on 7 July 2014. The Return of Cash was accompanied
of address and you have not moved, contact the registrar immediately by a consolidation of the Existing Ordinary Shares in the ratio
•• Consider having your dividends paid directly into your bank or building of 16 New Ordinary Shares for every 17 Existing Ordinary Shares.
society account. This will reduce the risk of the cheque being intercepted The New Ordinary Shares were admitted to trading on 8 July 2014.
or lost in the post. You can complete a Request for Payment of Interest The B and C shares were not admitted to trading.
or Dividends Form available from www.compass-group.com and send
The Base Cost Apportionment is in general terms based on
it to the registrar or register online at www.capitashareportal.com using
respective market values on the first day after the reorganisation
the Share Portal service. Additional information can be obtained from
on which a price for the New Ordinary Shares was quoted on the
the registrar
London Stock Exchange. Based on the New Ordinary Share price
•• On changing your bank or building society account, inform the
of 1,024.50 pence and the market value of a B Share and of a
Financial statements
registrar of the details of the new account and respond to any letters
C Share of 56 pence, and calculated using the ratio of 16 New
Capita Asset Services send you about this
Ordinary Shares and 17 B or 17 C Shares for every 17 Existing
•• When buying or selling shares, deal only with brokers registered in your
Ordinary Shares previously held, 94.51% of the base cost of the
country of residence or the UK
Existing Ordinary Shares is apportioned to the New Ordinary
Shares and 5.49% to the B and/or C Shares.
WARNING ABOUT SHARE FRAUD
Fraudsters use persuasive and high pressure tactics to lure investors The information provided above is only intended to provide general guidance to
into scams. They may offer to sell shares that turn out to be worthless UK shareholders and is not intended to be, and should not be construed to be,
or non-existent, or to buy shares at an inflated price in return for an legal or taxation advice to any particular UK shareholder. It states the position
upfront payment. as of 9 July 2014. If you are in any doubt as to your tax position, you are
recommended to seek your own tax advice from an independent professional
Whilst high profits are promised, if you buy or sell shares in this way, you adviser. This note must be read in conjunction with the Circular to Shareholders
Corporate governance
Company subject to the following conditions:
In accordance with section 439A of the Companies Act (the CA 2006),
21.1 the maximum aggregate number of ordinary shares hereby a separate Resolution on the Remuneration Policy part of the Directors’
authorised to be purchased is 166,950,000; Remuneration Report is required to be put to a vote by shareholders.
21.2 the minimum price (excluding expenses) which may be paid The vote is binding which means that payments cannot be made under
for each ordinary share is 10 5⁄8 pence; the Policy until it has been approved by shareholders.
21.3 the maximum price (excluding expenses) which may be paid
for each ordinary share in respect of a share contracted to be The Policy Report must be put to shareholders at least every three years,
purchased on any day, does not exceed the higher of (1) an unless during that time it is to be changed. The Company currently
amount equal to 105% of the average of the middle market intends to submit the Policy for approval by shareholders every
quotations for an ordinary share as derived from the London three years.
Stock Exchange Daily Official List for the five business days
immediately preceding the day on which the purchase is made RESOLUTION 3 – DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
and (2) the higher of the price of the last independent trade and In accordance with section 439 of the CA 2006, shareholders are
the highest current independent bid for an ordinary share as requested to approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report. The
Financial statements
derived from the London Stock Exchange Trading System; and Directors’ Remuneration Report is set out on pages 59 to 76 of the
21.4 this authority shall expire, unless previously renewed, varied or 2014 Annual Report and Accounts. The vote is advisory.
revoked by the Company, at the conclusion of the next Annual
General Meeting of the Company or 4 August 2016, whichever RESOLUTION 4 – FINAL DIVIDEND
is the earlier (except in relation to the purchase of ordinary The final dividend for the year ended 30 September 2014 will be paid on
shares, the contract for which was concluded prior to the expiry 23 February 2015 to shareholders on the register at the close of business
of this authority and which will or may be executed wholly or on 23 January 2015, subject to shareholder approval.
partly after the expiry of this authority).
RESOLUTIONS 5 TO 14 – ELECTION AND RE-ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
22. To authorise the directors to call a general meeting of the Company, Biographical details of all the directors standing for election or
other than an Annual General Meeting, on not less than 14 clear re-election appear on pages 46 and 47 of the 2014 Annual Report.
working days’ notice, provided that this authority shall expire at the
In line with the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association,
RESOLUTION 17 – DONATIONS TO POLITICAL PARTIES issued ordinary share capital in connection with a rights issue in favour
It is not Group policy to make donations to political parties. However, it of ordinary shareholders with a nominal value of up to £59,128,125
is possible that certain routine activities undertaken by the Company and (representing 556,500,000 ordinary shares of 10 5⁄8 pence each). Such
its subsidiaries might unintentionally fall within the wide definition of additional authority will be valid until the conclusion of the 2016 AGM.
matters constituting political donations and expenditure in the CA 2006.
If the Company uses any of the additional one third authority permitted
Any expenditure that is regulated under the CA 2006 must first be
by the Guidelines, the Company will ensure that all directors stand for
approved by shareholders and will be disclosed in next year’s Annual
re-election. The Company’s current practice is that all directors submit
Report. This Resolution, if passed, will renew the directors’ authority
themselves for re-election each year in accordance with the Code,
until the AGM to be held in 2016 (when the directors intend to renew
notwithstanding the provisions set out in the Guidelines.
this authority) to make donations and incur expenditure which might
otherwise be caught by the terms of the CA 2006, up to an aggregate The total authorisation sought by Resolution 19 is equal to
amount of £100,000 for the Company and for subsidiary companies. approximately two thirds of the issued ordinary share capital of the
Company as at 1 December 2014, being the last practicable date prior
RESOLUTION 18 – AMENDMENT TO LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN to publication of this Notice.
This Resolution seeks approval for the following changes to the Compass
Resolutions 1 to 19 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and require that more
Group PLC Long Term Incentive Plan 2010 (LTIP) to reflect the
than half of the votes cast must be in favour of a resolution for it to be passed.
Directors’ Remuneration Policy as set out in the Directors’ Remuneration
Report (see Resolution 2 above):
RESOLUTION 20 – DISAPPLICATION OF PRE-EMPTION RIGHTS
•• To increase the individual limit for the market value of shares subject to If the Company issues new shares, or sells treasury shares, for cash
awards which can be granted to executive directors in a financial year (other than in connection with an employee share scheme), it must first
from 200% to a maximum of 400% of annual basic salary (the latter offer them to existing shareholders in proportion to their existing
multiplier to be used only in exceptional circumstances) with the normal holdings. In accordance with investor guidelines, approval is sought
percentage being 250% of annual basic salary in the case of the Group by the directors to issue a limited number of ordinary shares for cash
Chief Executive and 200% for the other executive directors; without offering them to existing shareholders.
•• To renew and extend the circumstances in which malus or clawback can
Resolution 20 seeks to renew the directors’ authority to issue equity
be applied to awards made under the LTIP so that the provisions apply
securities of the Company for cash without application of pre-emption
both before an award vests and for the three years after vesting and apply
rights pursuant to Article 13 of the Company’s Articles of Association
in various circumstances, such as serious misconduct of a participant,
and section 561 of the CA 2006. Other than in connection with a rights,
including where the facts arise after termination of employment, with the
scrip dividend, or other similar issue, the authority contained in this
intention that the remedies are widened to include lapsing awards which
Resolution would be limited to a maximum nominal amount of
have not vested and forfeiting of vested awards with the right to reclaim
£8,868,688.
amounts from the affected participant;
•• To permit awards to be made which increase in line with dividends paid This represents 83,470,000 ordinary shares of 10 5⁄8 pence each in the
by the Company on its ordinary shares; capital of the Company, which is approximately 5% of the Company’s
•• To clarify the rules in respect of the use of existing rather than new issue issued ordinary share capital as at 1 December 2014 (being the last
shares to satisfy awards; and practicable date prior to the publication of this Notice). The authority
•• To enable the Remuneration Committee to impose a holding period would, unless previously renewed, revoked or varied by shareholders,
requirement of up to five years on participants whose awards have vested, expire at the conclusion of the AGM of the Company to be held in 2016
subject to the realisation of vested awards to discharge tax and social or on 4 May 2016, if earlier.
security requirements.
Save for issues of shares in respect of various employee share schemes
The rules of the LTIP showing the proposed amendments are available and any share dividend alternatives, the directors have no current plans
for inspection before and during the AGM, as noted on page 146 of this to utilise either of the authorities sought by Resolutions 19 and 20,
Notice of Meeting. although they consider their renewal appropriate in order to retain
maximum flexibility to take advantage of business opportunities as they
RESOLUTION 19 – DIRECTORS’ AUTHORITY TO ALLOT SHARES arise. In addition, and in line with best practice, the Company has not
The purpose of Resolution 19 is to renew the directors’ power to issued more than 7.5% of its issued share capital on a non-pro rata basis
allot shares. Resolution 19.1 seeks to grant the directors authority to over the last three years and the Board confirms its intention to follow
allot, pursuant to Article 12 of the Company’s Articles of Association best practice set out in the Pre-emption Group’s Statement of Principles
and section 551 of the CA 2006, relevant securities with a maximum which provides that usage of this authority in excess of 7.5% of the
nominal amount of £59,128,125. This represents 556,500,000 ordinary Company’s issued share capital in a rolling three year period would not
shares of 10 5⁄8 pence each in the capital of the Company, which is take place without prior consultation with shareholders.
approximately one third of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital
as at 1 December 2014 (being the last practicable date prior to the RESOLUTION 21 – PURCHASE OF OWN SHARES
publication of this Notice). The Company does not currently hold This Resolution authorises the directors to make limited on market
any shares as treasury shares. The authority would, unless previously purchases of the Company’s ordinary shares. The power is limited to a
renewed, revoked or varied by shareholders, remain in force up to maximum of 166,950,000 shares (just under 10% of the issued ordinary
the conclusion of the AGM of the Company to be held in 2016, or share capital as at 1 December 2014, being the last practicable date
4 May 2016, whichever is earlier. prior to the publication of this Notice) and details the minimum and
maximum prices that can be paid, exclusive of expenses. The authority
In accordance with the Investment Management Association Allotment
conferred by this Resolution will expire at the conclusion of the
Guidelines (the Guidelines), Resolution 19.2 seeks to grant the directors
Company’s next AGM or 18 months from the passing of this Resolution,
authority to allot approximately a further one third of the Company’s
whichever is the earlier.
Corporate governance
£1 billion Return of Cash to shareholders and associated Share Capital BR3 4ZF;
Consolidation until after completion of this transaction on 29 July 2014. •• going to www.capitashareportal.com and following the instructions
The £500 million share repurchase programme recommenced on for electronic submission provided there; or
31 July 2014 and is now expected to be completed during 2015. •• having an appropriate CREST message transmitted, if you are a
Beyond this programme, the directors have no present intention of user of the CREST system (including CREST personal members).
exercising the authority to purchase the Company’s ordinary shares but Please refer to the CREST manual on the Euroclear website
they consider it desirable to provide maximum flexibility in the management (www.euroclear.com/CREST) for further information.
of the Company’s capital resources. The directors would only purchase Return of the Form of Proxy will not prevent a shareholder from
shares if, in their opinion, the expected effect would be to result in an attending the Meeting and voting in person. However, if you do attend
increase in earnings per share and would benefit shareholders generally. the Meeting, any proxy appointment will be treated as revoked.
As at 1 December 2014 (being the last practicable date prior to the The electronic addresses provided in this Notice are provided solely
publication of this Notice), there were options to subscribe for ordinary for the purpose of enabling shareholders to register the appointment
shares issued by the Company outstanding over approximately of a proxy or proxies for the Meeting or to submit their voting
19,724,400 shares which represent 1.18% of the Company’s issued
Financial statements
directions electronically. You may not use any electronic address
ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) at that date. If the provided in the Notice of this Meeting to communicate with the
authority to purchase the Company’s ordinary shares was exercised Company for any purposes other than those expressly stated.
in full, these options would represent 1.31% of the Company’s issued
ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares). (ii) To be effective, the Form of Proxy must be completed in accordance
with the instructions and received by the Company’s registrar by
RESOLUTION 22 – NOTICE OF MEETINGS OTHER THAN ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS 12 noon on Tuesday 3 February 2015.
The Company’s Articles of Association allow the directors to call general To appoint a proxy or to give an instruction to a previously
meetings other than annual general meetings on 14 working days’ notice. appointed proxy via the CREST system, the CREST message must
However, under the Companies (Shareholders’ Rights) Regulations 2009 be received by the issuer’s agent (ID RA10) by 12 noon on Tuesday
(the Regulations), all general meetings must be held on 21 days’ notice, 3 February 2015. Please note, however, that proxy messages cannot
unless shareholders agree to a shorter notice period, and the Company be sent through CREST on weekends, public holidays or after
recommend that all shareholders vote in favour of all Resolutions, as the specifies that only those shareholders registered in the Register of
directors intend to do in respect of their own holdings. Members of the Company as at 6.00pm on Tuesday 3 February 2015
or, in the event that the Meeting is adjourned, in the Register of
Members 48 hours before the time of any adjourned meeting, shall be
entitled to attend or vote at the Meeting in respect of the number of
shares registered in their name at the relevant time. Changes to
entries on the Register of Members after 6.00pm on 3 February 2015
or, in the event that the Meeting is adjourned, less than 48 hours
before the time of any adjourned meeting, shall be disregarded in
determining the rights of any person to attend or vote at the Meeting.
Corporate governance
Tea and coffee will be available before the Meeting and light refreshments
VOTING AT THE AGM
will be served afterwards.
The Company proposes that all Resolutions to be proposed at the AGM
will be put to the vote on a poll. This will result in a more accurate
SHAREHOLDER ENQUIRIES
reflection of the views of all of the Company’s shareholders by ensuring
Capita Asset Services maintain the Company’s share register. If you have
that every vote is recognised, including the votes of shareholders who are
any enquiries about the AGM or about your shareholding, you should
unable to attend the Meeting but who have appointed a proxy for the
contact Capita Asset Services, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road,
Meeting. On a poll, each shareholder has one vote for each share held.
Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU.
After each Resolution is put to the Meeting, you will be asked to cast
your vote. All of the votes of the shareholders present will be counted, AMERICAN DEPOSITARY RECEIPT ENQUIRIES
and added to those received by proxy, and the provisional final votes will BNY Mellon maintains the Company’s American Depositary Receipt
be displayed at the Meeting. register. If you have any enquiries about your holding of Compass
American Depositary Shares, you should contact BNY Mellon,
The voting results, which will include all votes cast for and against each
Shareowner Services, Computershare, P.O. Box 30170, College Station
Resolution at the Meeting, and all proxies lodged prior to the Meeting,
TX 77842-3170, USA.
Financial statements
will be announced at the Meeting and published on the Company’s
website as soon as practicable after the Meeting. The Company will also
DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
disclose the number of votes withheld.
Your personal data includes all data provided by you, or on your behalf,
If you have already voted by proxy, you will still be able to vote at the which relates to you as a shareholder, including your name and contact
Meeting and your vote on the day will replace your previously lodged details, the votes you cast and your Reference Number (attributed to you
proxy vote. by the Company). The Company determines the purposes for which and
the manner in which your personal data is to be processed. The Company
Whomever you appoint as a proxy can vote or abstain from voting as he
and any third party to which it discloses the data (including the
or she decides on any other business, which may validly come before the
Company’s Registrar) may process your personal data for the purposes
AGM. This includes proxies appointed using the CREST service. Details
of compiling and updating the Company’s records, fulfilling its legal
of how to complete the appointment of a proxy either electronically or on
obligations and processing the shareholder rights you exercise.
paper are given in the notes to this Notice.
Parliament Street
Victoria Embankment
Shareholder information
Parliament
Dartmouth Street
Square
Queen Anne’s Gate. Lewisham Street
Parker St.
Matthew
St. Margaret’s
ary Houses of
ctu
Broadway Tothill Street an Parliament
dS
oa
Br Westminster
y
dwa
Abbey
Great Smith Street
St. James’s t
ee
Str
Broa
Park ia
tor
Tufton Street
New
Scotland Yard Vic
Abingdon Street
n
tio
Sta Gre
oria at C
V ict olle
To ge
Str
eet
Old Pye Street