Rangtong-Shentong

Rangtong and shentong are two distinctive views on emptiness (sunyata) and the two truths doctrine within
Tibetan Buddhism.

Rangtong (Wylie: rang stong; "empty of self-nature") is a philosophical term in Tibetan Buddhism that is used to
distinguish the majority Madhyamaka teaching on the nature of śūnyatā or "emptiness", namely that all
phenomena are empty of an enduring and/or unchanging essence or "self," and that this emptiness is not an
absolute reality, but a mere nominal characterisation of phenomena.[1] It is related to the prasangika approach,
which argues that no syllogistic forms of reasoning should be used to debate the notion of inherent existence, but
only arguments which show the logical implications and absurdity of positions based upon inherent existence. This
position is the mainstream Gelugpa interpretation of Madhyamaka, one of the main Mahayana schools, which
dominates Vajrayana Buddhism.

Shentong (Tibetan: གཞན་ ོང་, Wylie: gzhan stong, Lhasa dialect: [ɕɛ̀ t̃ ṍŋ], also transliterated zhäntong or
zhentong; literally "other-emptiness") is a position within Tibetan Madhyamaka. It applies śūnyatā in a specific
way, agreeing that relative reality is empty of self-nature, but stating that absolute reality
(Paramarthasatya)[2][note 1] is "non-dual Buddhajnana"[2][note 2] and "empty" (Wylie: stong) only of "other,"
(Wylie: gzhan) relative phenomena, but is itself not empty[3] and "truly existing."[4] This absolute reality is
described by positive terms, an approach which helps "to overcome certain residual subtle concepts"[5] and "the
habit [...] of negating whatever experience arises in his/her mind."[6] It destroys false concepts, as does
prasangika, but it also alerts the practitioner "to the presence of a dynamic, positive Reality that is to be
experienced once the conceptual mind is defeated."[6]

Shentong was systematized and articulated under that name by Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen (1292–1361), who
identified absolute reality with the Buddha-nature.[3] Shentong was suppressed by the dominant Gelug school for
several hundred years, equally for political reasons as doctrinal reasons. In 1658, the Gelug authorities banned the
Jonang school for political reasons, forcibly converting its monks and monasteries to the Gelug school, as well as
banning shentong philosophy and books, thus making the rangtong position the overwhelmingly majority one in
Tibetan Buddhism.[1]

After this suppression various shentong views were propagated mainly by Karma Kagyu and Nyingma lamas. The
19th century saw a revival of Shentong-views,[7] and continued with the Rimé movement. Nowadays Shentong is
present primarily as the main philosophical theory of the Jonang school, although it is also taught by the Sakya and
Kagyu schools,[8][9] where it is identified with centerless awareness.

Contents
Etymology
Rangtong
Shentong
Philosophy
 Origins and development
Criticisms and repression
Scholarly studies
See also
Notes
References
Sources
Further reading
External links

Etymology
The term rangtong is not an autonym but rather arose from the shentong theorist Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, who
coined the term "shentong" to characterise his own teachings and "rangtong" to refer to the teachings he
opposed.[1]

Shentong literally means "other-emptiness", "empty" (Wylie: stong) of "other" (Wylie: gzhan), i.e., empty of all
qualities other than its own inherent existent. Yet, the term shentong also refers to Yogacara teachings,[10] or
Yogacara Madhyamaka,[5] which includes the teachings of Śāntarakṣita. In the Gelugpa understanding of the
Svatantrika-Prasaṅgika distinction, Yogacara Madhyamaka is labeled as svatantrika, and set against a strict
prasaṅgika approach which rejects any inherent existence.
Another translation of shentong is "extrinsic emptiness,"[11] a term which is also used to refer to "Great
Mādhyamaka" (dbu ma chen po), a term which has also been used by Klong chen pa and Mipham to refer to
Prasaṅgika Madhyamaka, and Tsongkhapa has also used this term.[11]

Rangtong
Rangtong is the majority Tibetan teaching on the nature of śūnyatā or "emptiness", namely that all phenomena are
empty of a self-nature in both the relative and absolute sense, without positing anything beyond that.[1] This
position is the mainstream Tibetan interpretation of Madhyamaka, especially by the followers of Prasaṅgika
Mādhyamaka

Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), who also wrote in response to shentong, is the most outspoken defendant of rangtong.
He saw emptiness as a consequence of dependent designation, the teaching that no thing or phenomenon has an
existence of its own, but always comes into existence in dependence upon conceptual designation by a conscious
mind. (See Designation & "Conventional Truth")

Tsongkhapa's view on "ultimate reality" is condensed in the sort text In Praise of Dependent Arising[12] c.q. In
Praise of Relativity[13][14] c.q. The Essence of Eloquency.[14] It states that "things" do exist conventionally, but
ultimately everything is dependently arisen, and therefore void of inherent existence:[14]

Whatever depends on causes and conditions

Is empty of intrinsic reality
What excellent instruction could there be
 More marvellous than this discovery?[14]

This means that conventionally things do exist, and that there is no use in denying that. But it also means that
ultimately those things have no 'existence of their own', and that cognizing then as such results from cognitive
operations, not from some unchangeable essence.[15] Tsongkhapa:

Since objects do not exist through their own nature, they are established as existing through the force
of convention.[15]

It also means that there is no "transcendental ground," and that "ultimate reality" has no existence of its own, but
is the negation of such a transcendental reality, and the impossibility of any statement on such an ultimately
existing transcendental reality: it is no more than a fabrication of the mind.[14] Susan Kahn further explains:

Ultimate truth does not point to a transcendent reality, but to the transcendence of deception. It is
critical to emphasize that the ultimate truth of emptiness is a negational truth. In looking for
inherently existent phenomena it is revealed that it cannot be found. This absence is not findable
because it is not an entity, just as a room without an elephant in it does not contain an elephantless
substance. Even conventionally, elephantlessness does not exist. Ultimate truth or emptiness does
not point to an essence or nature, however subtle, that everything is made of.[15]
Shentong

Philosophy
33

Shentong views the two truths doctrine as distinguishing between

relative and absolute reality, agreeing that relative reality is empty of
self-nature, but stating that absolute reality is "empty" (Wylie: stong)
only of "other" (Wylie: gzhan) relative phenomena, but is itself not
empty.[3] This absolute reality is the "ground or substratum" which is
"uncreated and indestructible, noncomposite and beyond the chain of
dependent origination."[16] Dolpopa identified this absolute reality with
the Buddha-nature.[3] Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, an early
Tibetan exponent of the shentong
The shentong-view is related to the Ratnagotravibhāga sutra and the view.
Yogacara-Madhyamaka synthesis of Śāntarakṣita. The truth of sunyata
is acknowledged, but not considered to be the highest truth, which is
the empty nature of mind. Insight into sunyata is preparatory for the recognition of the nature of mind.

Hookham explains the Shentong position, referring to her Kagyu teacher Khenpo Tsultrim's Progressive Stages of
Meditation on Emptiness.[17] Khenpo Tsultrim presents five stages of meditation, which he relates to five different
schools or approaches:[18][19]
 "Sravaka meditation on non-self" - meditation on the emptiness of the skandhas and the non-existence of a
personal self;
"Cittamatra-approach" - meditation on the mind-stream, the ever-continuing process of perception, and the
non-duality of perceived and perceiver;
"Svatantrika-Madhyamaka approach" - meditation on all dhammas, which are empty of self-nature, and the
negation of any "substance";
"Prasangika-Madhyamaka approach" - meditation on "the non-conceptual (nisprapanca) nature of both the
appearance of phenomena and their self-emptiness." In this approach, all concepts are to be abandoned;
Shentong (Yogacara Madhyamaka) - meditation on Paramarthasatya ("Absolute Reality"),[2][note 1]
Buddhajnana,[note 2] which is beyond concepts, and described by terms as "truly existing."[5] This approach
helps "to overcome certain residual subtle concepts,"[5] and "the habit - fostered on the earlier stages of the
path - of negating whatever experience arises in his/her mind."[6] It destroys false concepts, as does
prasangika, but it also alerts the practitioner "to the presence of a dynamic, positive Reality that is to be
experienced once the conceptual mind is defeated."[6]

Origins and development

The notion of sentong grew out the Tibetan attempts to reconcile the contradiction between the Madhyama stance
on the emptiness of phenomena, and the later notion of an eternal Buddha-nature.[21]

The earliest shentong views are usually asserted to have been presented in a group of treatises variously attributed
jointly to Asanga and Maitreyanātha, especially in the treatise known as the Unsurpassed Continuum
(Uttaratantraśāstra, also called the Ratnagotravibhāga),[22] and in a body of Mādhyamaka treatises attributed to
Nāgārjuna (e.g., the Dharmadhātustava, "In praise of the Dharmadhatu").[23]
The first exposition of a shentong view is sometimes attributed to Śāntarakṣita ( 725–788), but most scholars argue
that his presentation of Madhyamaka thought is more accurately labeled Yogācāra-Svātantrika-Madhyamaka.
The eleventh-century Tibetan master Yumo Mikyo Dorje, a student of the Kashmiri scholar Somanatha, was
possibly the first Tibetan master to articulate a shentong view, after his experiences during a Kālacakra retreat.[24]

Shentong was systematized and articulated under that name by Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen (1292–1361),[25] who
originally was Sakya-trained lama, and joined the Jonang school with which shentong is strongly associated. In
1321 Dolpopa visited Tsurphu Monastery for the first time, and had extensive discussions with Rangjung Dorje
(1284–1339) about doctrinal issues. It appears that Rangjung Dorje almost certainly influenced the development of
some of Dolpopa's theories, possibly including his shentong method.[26][note 3] Dolpopa claimed to have
extraordinary insights,[note 4] and his meditational experience seems to have played a great role in the development
of his shentong-stance.[28] Dolpopa developed a new philosophical vocabulary, based on Sanskrit and Tibetan, to
express his insights, presenting provisional statements on absolute reality and Buddha-nature as statements of
definitive meaning, which didn't requite further interpretation.[29]

Chödrak Gyatso, 7th Karmapa Lama (1454–1506), and the Sakya scholar Sakya Chokden (Wylie: gSer mdog Pan
chen Sa kya mChog ldan, 1428–1507) were also important proponents of a shentong view.[30] In the Jonang
tradition, Tāranātha [1575–1635] is second in importance only to Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen himself. He was
responsible for the short-lived renaissance of the school as a whole in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth
centuries, and of the widespread revitalization of the shentong theory in particular. [31] Tāranātha wrote a
commentary on the Heart Sutra which asserts that the Sutra, and prajñāpāramitā, teaches the Shentong view. [32]
After the suppression of the Jonang school and its texts and the texts of Sakya Chokden by the Tibetan government
in the seventeenth century, various shentong views were propagated mainly by Karma Kagyu and Nyingma lamas.
In particular, the eighth Tai Situpa (1700–1774) and Katok Tsewang Norbu (1698–1755)—Karma Kagyu and
Nyingma lamas, respectively, and close colleagues—were very instrumental in reviving shentong among their sects.

Also instrumental was Situ Panchen (1700–1774), senior court chaplain in the Kingdom of Derge, a student of
Katok Tsewang Norbu. "In the end it would be Situ more than anyone who would create the environment for the
widespread acceptance of the Shentong theories in the next century.[33] This revival was continued by Jamgon
Kongtrul, a nineteenth-century ecumenical (rimé) scholar and forceful exponent of shentong. shentong views were
also advanced recently by the eminent Kagyu Lamas Kalu Rinpoche and Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche.

Criticisms and repression

Shentong views have often come under criticism by followers of all four of the main Tibetan Buddhist schools, but
particularly by the Gelug. Shentong was suppressed by the dominant Gelug school for several hundred years,
equally for political reasons as doctrinal reasons. In 1658, the Gelug authorities banned the Jonang school for
political reasons, forcibly converting its monks and monasteries to the Gelug school, as well as banning shentong
philosophy and books, thus making the rangtong position the overwhelmingly majority one in Tibetan
Buddhism.[1]

"Exclusive Rangtongpas", as the contemporary western Kagyu scholar S.K. Hookham would call them, have
claimed that shentong views are inconsistent with the basic Mahāyāna teaching of emptiness, because Shentongpas
posit an absolute. They sometimes label shentong Madhyamaka "eternalistic Madhyamaka."
The great fourteenth-century Sakya master Buton Rinchen Drub (1290–1364) was very critical of shentong views.
Gyaltsab Je and Khedrup Gelek Pelzang, 1st Panchen Lama, two of Gelug founder Je Tsongkhapa’s primary
disciples, were also particularly critical of the shentong views of their time.

Among Kagyupas and Nyingmapas, the noted nineteenth-century Nyingma lama Jamgon Ju Mipham Gyatso wrote
works both supportive and critical of shentong positions,[note 6] as did Mikyö Dorje, 8th Karmapa Lama.

Scholarly studies
According to Burchardi, limited attention given in academic studies to the various interpretations of gzhan
stong.[34]

The contemporary western Kagyu scholar Karl Brunnhölzl argues that there is no such thing as "shentong
Madhyamaka," but rather that orthodox Yogācāra philosophy (when understood properly) is entirely compatible
with Madhyamaka, and therefore shentong is not a novel position. He argues that Yogācāra has often been
mischaracterized and unfairly marginalized in Tibetan Buddhist curricula.

See also
Buddha-nature
Nondualism

Notes
1. According to Hookham, non-dual experience is Ultimate Reality.[20]
2. According to Hookham, "The Chinese Tathagarba schools describe Buddhajnana as the totality of all that is,
which pervades every part of all that is in its totality."[20] According to Hookham, for Shentong Buddhajnana is
"the non-dual nature of Mind completely unobscured and endowed with its countless Buddha Qualities
(Buddhagunas).[20]
3. See also Karl Brunnhölzl (2008), In Praise of Dharmadhatu, a translation of Rangjung Dorje's commentary on
the Dharmadhātustava, "I Parise of the Dharmadhatu," a treatise which is (incorrectly) attributed to Nagarjuna.
4. Dolpopa: "I discovered many profound essential points which have not been discovered, have not been
realized, and have not been mastered by egotistical scholars, most great meditators endowed with experience
and realization, and most of those who are arrogant as great upholders of secret mantra. Because a fine
realization burst forth from within, and because I have an exceptional certainty untainted by doubts, not only
most great meditators endowed with experience and realization, and those who are arrogant as great
upholders of secret mantra, but even the Buddha definitely could not turn me back from this."[27]
5. (Tib. rigs, Skt. gotta), synonymous with Buddha-nature
6. I.e., in his Lion's Roar of Extrinsic Emptiness (q.v. external link cited below) and in his Long Excursus on the
Core of Thus-Arrivedness i.e., tathãgatagarbha (bde-gshegs snying-po stong-thun chen-mo seng-ge'i nga-ro).
In the Long Excursus Mipham Rinpoche follows closely the gist of an historically much earlier discussion of the
subject of "lineage", [note 5] that of Longchenpa's Treasure of Philosophical Systems (grub mtha' mdzod).
There Mipham identifies two general extremes of interpretation, the nihilistic identification of Buddha-nature
with emptiness to the exclusion of form, and the identification of Buddha-nature as a substantially real entity
that is "empty-of-other" (gzhan-gyis stong-pa). Thus it appears that Mipham Rinpoche wished to distance
himself from both the Gelug/Sakya mainstream (e.g., rangtong or self-emptiness) interpretation as well as the
shentong mainstream. However, what Mipham refers to in the Long Excursus as shentong is only vaguely
defined as such, and to that extent, bears more resemblance to the stock misinterpretations of shentong as
given by its ideological opponents, than with any actual position held by classical Shentongpas themselves. In
the final analysis, both Longchenpa's and Jamgon Ju Mipham Gyatso's interpretations of Buddha-nature in the
aforementioned texts are substantially identical with most (though not all) of the most important philosophical
distinctions invoked by Dolpopa and others in propounding the superiority and definitude of shentong
approaches. Where Longchenpa and Mipham differ most obviously from self-identified Shentongpa
commentators is in not applying the shentong label to their positions, such as Great Madhyamaka of Other-
Emptiness" (gzhan-stong dbu-ma chen-po).

References
1. Stearns, Cyrus (2010). The Buddha from Dölpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master
Dölpopa Sherab Gyaltsen (https://books.google.fi/books?id=t9rlyjOHZ98C&lpg=PR4&ots=ZB4NCICYy9&dq
=%22The%20Buddha%20from%20D%C3%B6lpo%20%3A%20a%20study%20of%20the%20life%20and%20t
hought%20of%20the%20Tibetan%20master%20D%C3%B6lpopa%20Sherab%20Gyaltsen%22&pg=PP1#v=o
 nepage&q=autonym&f=false) (Rev. and enl. ed.). Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications. ISBN 9781559393430.
Retrieved 2 May 2015.
2. Hookham 1991, p. 21.
3. Stearns 1999, p. 3.
4. Hookham 1991, p. 12.
5. Hookham 1991, p. 22.
6. Hookham 1991, p. 23.
7. Stearns 2002, p. 76.
8. Pema Tönyö Nyinje, 12th Tai Situpa. Ground, Path and Fruition. Zhyisil Chokyi Ghatsal Charitable Trust.
p. 2005. ISBN 978-1877294358.
9. Hookham 1991, p. 13.
10. Brunholzl 2009, p. 446.
11. Pettit 1999, p. 113.
12. Alexander Berzin, In Praise of Dependent Arising (http://studybuddhism.com/en/tibetan-buddhism/original-text
s/sutra-texts/in-praise-of-dependent-arising)
13. Robert Thurman, Praise of Buddha Shakyamuni for his teaching of Relativity. The Short Essence of
Eloquence (http://www.bodhicitta.net/Essence%20of%20Eloquence.htm)
14. Patrick Jennings, Tsongkhapa: In Praise of Relativity; The Essence of Eloquence (http://thenonbuddhist.com/2
014/01/12/tsongkhapa-in-praise-of-relativity-the-essence-of-eloquence/) Archived (https://web.archive.org/we
b/20150518074106/http://thenonbuddhist.com/2014/01/12/tsongkhapa-in-praise-of-relativity-the-essence-of-el
oquence/) 2015-05-18 at the Wayback Machine
15. Susan Kahn, The Two Truths of Buddhism and The Emptiness of Emptiness (http://emptinessteachings.com/2
014/09/11/the-two-truths-of-buddhism-and-the-emptiness-of-emptiness/)
16. Stearns 1999, p. 82.
17. Hookham 1991, p. 19.
18. Hookham 1991, p. 19-26.
19. Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso 1994.
20. Hookham 1991, p. 37.
21. Stearns 1999, p. 1.
22. Hokham 1991.
23. Brunnhölzl 2008.
24. Stearns 1999.
25. Stearns 1999, p. 2.
26. Stearns 1999, p. 17, 47-48, 51-52, 61.
27. Stearns 1999, p. 54.
28. Stears 1999, p. 46-47.
29. Stears 1999, p. 48-49.
30. Stearns 1999, p. 60-63.
31. Stearns 1999 p.68
32. Tomlin 2017
33. Stearns, Cyrus (2003). The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen (https://books.google.com/books?id=zYiWkLTrU3oC&pg=PA75&dq=Situ+Panchen&
client=firefox-a#PPA76,M1). Motilal Banarsidass Publ. p. 76. ISBN 81-208-1833-4.
34. Burchardi, Anne (2007). A Look at the Diversity of the Gzhan stong Tradition. JIATS, no. 3 (December 2007),
THDL #T3128, 24 pp. 2007 by Anne Burchardi, IATS, and THDL. Source: [1] (http://www.thdl.org/collections/jo
urnal/jiats/index.php?doc=jiats03burchardi.xml&s=d0e287) (accessed: Sunday August 17, 2008) p.1

Sources
Brunnhölzl, Karl (2004), The Center of the Sunlit Sky: Madhyamaka in the Kagyu Tradition, Shambhala,
ISBN 1-55939-218-5
Brunnhölzl, Karl (2008), In Praise of Dharmadhatu, Shambhala
Brunnholzl, Karl (2009), Luminous Heart: The Third Karmapa on Consciousness, Wisdom, and Buddha
Nature, Snow Lion Publications
Burchardi, Anne (2007). A Look at the Diversity of the Gzhan stong Tradition. JIATS, no. 3 (December 2007),
THDL #T3128, 24 pp. © 2007 by Anne Burchardi, IATS, and THDL. Source: [2] (https://archive.is/2012091302
2245/http://www.thdl.org/collections/journal/jiats/index.php?doc=jiats03burchardi.xml&s=d0e287) (accessed:
Sunday August 17, 2008)
Cabezón, José Ignacio (2005), "Tsong Kha Pa", in Jones, Lindsay (ed.), MacMillan Encyclopedia of Religion,
MacMillan
Cabezón, José Ignacio; Dargyay, Geshe (2007). Freedom from Extremes: Gorampa's "Distinguishing the
Views" and the Polemics of Emptiness. Wisdom Publications. ISBN 9780861715237.
Ven. Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso, Rimpoche. Progressive Stages Of Meditation On Emptiness, ISBN 0-
9511477-0-6
Hookham, S.K. (1991), The Buddha within : Tathagatagarbha doctrine according to the Shentong
interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhaga, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-
0791403587
 Jeffrey Hopkins (translator); Kevin Vose (editor) : Mountain Doctrine:Tibet’s Fundamental Treatise on Other-
Emptiness and the Buddha Matrix. Snow Lion, Ithaca (2006). - a translation of Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen's Ri
chos nges don rgya mtsho.
Roger Jackson.(2007) The Great Debate on Emptiness (http://www.snowlionpub.com/samples/Buddhadharma
BookReview.pdf): Review of The Essence of Other-Emptiness by Taranatha and Mountain Doctrine:Tibet’s
Fundamental Treatise on Other-Emptiness and the Buddha Matrix by Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen in
Buddhadharma, Summer 2007 p. 75-76
Pettit, John Whitney (1999), Mipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great
Perfection, Boston: Wisdom Publications, ISBN 0-86171-157-2
Stearns, Cyrus (1999), The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-7914-4191-1
Stearns, Cyrus (2003), The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, Motilal Banarsidass Publ., ISBN 81-208-1833-4
Taranatha (auth.), Jeffrey Hopkins, (trans.) The Essence of Other-Emptiness. Wisdom Books (2007). ISBN 1-
55939-273-8
Tāranātha, Jetsun (2008). The Essence of Zhentong. Translation based upon the ‘Dzam thang edition of the
'Gzhan stong snying po'. Jonang Foundation’s Digital Library (http://www.jonangfoundation.org/library):
Ngedon Thartuk Translation Initiative. Source: [3] (https://web.archive.org/web/20111107152750/http://www.jon
angfoundation.org/files/jf_snying%20po_final.pdf) (accessed: Sunday August 17, 2008)

Tomlin, Adele Tāranātha's Commentary on the Heart Sutra. Library of Tibetan Works and Archives (2017).

Further reading
 Stearns, Cyrus (1999), The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen, State University of New York Press, ISBN 0-7914-4191-1
Hookham, S.K. (1991). The Buddha within : Tathagatagarbha doctrine according to the Shentong
interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhaga. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-
0791403587.
Karl Brunnhölzl (2008), In Praise of Dharmadhatu, Shambhala
Jeffrey Hopkins (2017), Mountain Doctrine: Tibet's Fundamental Treatise on Other-Emptiness and the Buddha
Matrix, Shambhala
Adele Tomlin (2017), Taranatha's Commentary on the Heart Sutra, Library of Tibetan Works and Archives
(2017).

External links
Overview

Nigel Wellings (2009), Is there anything there? – the Tibetan Rangtong Shentong debate (https://web.archive.
org/web/20150518063508/http://www.contemplativeforum.co.uk/wordpress/?p=204)
Adele Tomlin (2018), The Shentong View of Emptiness – A Short Introduction and Reader (https://www.shento
ngkalacakra.com/shentong-madhyamaka/the-shentong-view-of-emptiness-a-short-introduction-and-reader/)'
Alexander Berin, Self-Voidness and Other Voidness (https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/v
ipashyana/self-voidness-and-other-voidness)

An exposition of the two truths by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rimpoche (https://web.archive.org/web/20051017

214618/http://kagyu.org/buddhism/cul/cul03.html)

Jonang
 Jonang Foundation (http://www.jonangfoundation.org)
Michael R. Sheehy, Dzogchen & Zhentong (http://www.jonangfoundation.org/blog/dzogchen-zhentong),
Jonang Foundation
Adele Tomlin, [4] (http://www.shentongkalacakra.com)

Tsongkhapa

Patrick Jennings, Tsongkhapa: In Praise of Relativity; The Essence of Eloquence (https://web.archive.org/web/

20150518074106/http://thenonbuddhist.com/2014/01/12/tsongkhapa-in-praise-of-relativity-the-essence-of-eloq
uence/)
Susan Kahn, The Two Truths of Buddhism and The Emptiness of Emptiness (http://emptinessteachings.com/2
014/09/11/the-two-truths-of-buddhism-and-the-emptiness-of-emptiness/)

Vedanta

Acharya Mahayogi Sridhar Rana Rinpoche, Vedanta vis-a-vis Shentong (https://web.archive.org/web/2015031

1142817/http://www.byomakusuma.org/Teachings/VedantaVisAVisShentong.aspx)

Other

Scholarly disquisition on The Buddha Within (http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-PHIL/need.htm)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rangtong-Shentong&oldid=907697143"

This page was last edited on 24 July 2019, at 17:14 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By
using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.