Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 187 views

    Republic of The Philippines Department of Education Region I Pangasinan Division Ii

    Uploaded by

    Måřïä Ļà Ğŕëàtha
    The document is an evaluation tool for assessing guidance program implementation in schools in the Philippines. It evaluates several criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, including the guidance program work plan, counseling and career guidance services provided, record keeping, facilities, stakeholder linkages, and counselor training. Scores on each criterion are multiplied by weights to calculate an overall program implementation rating. The tool aims to promote effective delivery of guidance services that support students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Republic of The Philippines Department of Education Region I Pangasinan Division Ii

    Uploaded by

    Måřïä Ļà Ğŕëàtha
    187 views3 pages
    The document is an evaluation tool for assessing guidance program implementation in schools in the Philippines. It evaluates several criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, including the guidance program work plan, counseling and career guidance services provided, record keeping, facilities, stakeholder linkages, and counselor training. Scores on each criterion are multiplied by weights to calculate an overall program implementation rating. The tool aims to promote effective delivery of guidance services that support students.

    Original Description:

    Evaluation tool

    Original Title

    Guidance Evaluation Tool1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is an evaluation tool for assessing guidance program implementation in schools in the Philippines. It evaluates several criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, including the guidance program work plan, counseling and career guidance services provided, record keeping, facilities, stakeholder linkages, and counselor training. Scores on each criterion are multiplied by weights to calculate an overall program implementation rating. The tool aims to promote effective delivery of guidance services that support students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    187 views3 pages

    Republic of The Philippines Department of Education Region I Pangasinan Division Ii

    Uploaded by

    Måřïä Ļà Ğŕëàtha
    The document is an evaluation tool for assessing guidance program implementation in schools in the Philippines. It evaluates several criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, including the guidance program work plan, counseling and career guidance services provided, record keeping, facilities, stakeholder linkages, and counselor training. Scores on each criterion are multiplied by weights to calculate an overall program implementation rating. The tool aims to promote effective delivery of guidance services that support students.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Republic of the Philippines

    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    Region I
    PANGASINAN DIVISION II

    EVALUATION TOOL FOR GUIDANCE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

    District / Municipality: ________________________ School: ______________________________________________


    School Head: _______________________________________________________ Date of Evaluation: __________
    Guidance Counselor/Designate: _________________________________________ Position: __________________

    Rating Scale: 5 – Outstanding 4 – Very Satisfactory 3 – Satisfactory 2 – Fair 1 – Poor

    I. Guidance Program / Work Plan / Action Plan (10%)

    5 – Crafted the Work Plan with the following indicators:


    a. Objectives are SMART and anchored to DepEd’s Mission, Vision, and Core Values
    b. Provided program/s for each of the services specified in Roman Numeral II
    c. Programs cater to the needs of the learners
    d. Strategies are age-appropriate
    e. Activities facilitates development of 21st Century Skills
    4 – Crafted the Work Plan with four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 - Crafted the Work Plan with three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 - Crafted the Work Plan with two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 - Crafted the Work Plan with one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    II. Guidance Services and Programs (70%)

    A. Counseling / Coaching / Conference / Interview (20%)

    5 – Conducted counseling / coaching / conference / interview with the following indicators:


    a. Provided warm and friendly atmosphere thus, earned the trust and confidence of learners
    b. Attended to 75% - 100% of learners with “concerns”
    c. Managed cases accordingly and treated information with utmost confidentiality
    d. Communication procedures between guidance counselors / designates and teachers are satisfactory
    e. With up-to-date counseling / coaching / conference log and other related forms
    4 – Conducted counseling / coaching / conference / interview with four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 – Conducted counseling / coaching / conference / interview with three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 – Conducted counseling / coaching / conference / interview with two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 – Conducted counseling / coaching / conference / interview with one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.2 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    B. Inventory Record (10%)

    5 – Established Learner’s Inventory Record with the following indicators:


    a. Complete and updated Learner’s Individual Inventory record
    b. Security of files that ensures confidentiality of records
    c. Systematic filing of records
    d. The forms used are sufficient and appropriate
    e. The records are used for program development
    4 – Established Learner’s Inventory Record with four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 - Established Learner’s Inventory Record with three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 - Established Learner’s Inventory Record with two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 - Established Learner’s Inventory Record with one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    C. Homeroom Guidance Program (10%)

    5 – Conducted Homeroom Guidance Program with the following indicators:


    a. With HGP (CGP for SHS) modules / curriculum guide
    b. Reflected in the advisers’ Class Program
    c. Conducted Homeroom Guidance (up-to-date HGP / CGP Log)
    d. Learner’s journal / output
    e. Guidance Counselor / Designate provided technical assistance to class advisers in the conduct of HGP
    4 – Conducted Homeroom Guidance Program with four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 - Conducted Homeroom Guidance Program with three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 - Conducted Homeroom Guidance Program with two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 - Conducted Homeroom Guidance Program with one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    D. Career Guidance (10%)

    5 – Conducted Career Guidance with the following indicators:


    a. Conducted Career Guidance Activities during the celebration of Career Guidance Week
    b. Involved stakeholders in the conduct of Career Guidance activities
    c. Submitted narrative report on the conduct of Career Guidance Week
    d. Conducted career coaching / counseling to learners
    e. Incorporated Career Guidance concepts in the HGP
    4 – Conducted Career Guidance with four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 – Conducted Career Guidance with three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 – Conducted Career Guidance with two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 – Conducted Career Guidance with one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    E. Child Protection and Anti-Bullying (10%)

    5 – Provision of the following indicators for Child Protection and Anti-Bullying Program implementation:
    a. School-based Child Protection and Anti-Bullying Policy approved by the CPC (reviewed and revised)
    b. Established Child Protection Committee (CPC); directory printed in tarpaulin, posted in strategic place
    c. Integrated CPP and Anti - Bullying concepts in the HGP
    d. Managed cases accordingly (e.g.filled-up Intake Sheets, treated cases with utmost confidentiality)
    e. Employed positive discipline approach
    4 – Provision of four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 – Provision of three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 – Provision of two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 – Provision of one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    F. Drop Out Reduction Program (10%)

    5 – Provision of the following indicators for the School’s Drop Out Reduction Program:
    a. Reduced the number of drop outs by 2% for the last two years
    b. Conducted home visitation
    c. Implemented prevention / intervention programs for PARDO / SARDO
    d. Prepared / Furnished copy of report on DORP
    4 – Provision of three (3) of the specified indicators
    3 – Provision of two (2) of the specified indicators
    2 – Provision of one (1) of the specified indicators
    1–

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    III. Physical Structure (10%)

    5 – Provision of the following indicators:


    a. Room or space for Guidance Office / Guidance Corner / Guidance Nook
    b. Room or space for Counseling / Coaching / Conference Nook with privacy for confidentiality
    c. Filing cabinets for Guidance files and records
    d. Different forms used for the different Guidance services
    e. Bulletin / Information Board
    4 – Provision of four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 – Provision of three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 – Provision of two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 – Provision of one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.1 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    IV. Linkages (5%)

    5 – Provision of the following indicators:


    a. Directory of internal stakeholders
    b. Directory of external stakeholders
    c. Referral system
    d. Communication procedures between guidance counselor / designate and stakeholders are satisfactory
    e. Support of stakeholders to the School’s Guidance Program is evident
    4 – Provision of four (4) of the specified indicators
    3 – Provision of three (3) of the specified indicators
    2 – Provision of two (2) of the specified indicators
    1 – Provision of one (1) of the specified indicators

    Rating: ________ x 0.05 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    V. Training of Guidance Counselor / Designate (5%)

    For the last three (3) years, Guidance Counselor / Designate attended seminars / training:

    5 – At least one (1) Guidance-related International Seminar / Training


    4 – At least one (1) Guidance-related National Seminar / Training
    3 – At least one (1) Guidance-related Regional Seminar / Training
    2 – At least two (2) Guidance-Related Division Seminar / Training
    1 – At least two (2) District / School Guidance-related Seminar / Training

    Rating: ________ x 0.05 = __________________ (round off to two decimal places)

    VI. Plus Factors (not to exceed 10%)

    Rating to be given is upon the discretion of the Evaluators

    A. Guidance Corner in every classroom (2%)


    B. Case Study / Research (2%)
    C. Interventions / Preventions Program (2%)
    D. Outreach / Community Program (2%)
    E. Resource Person / Facilitator in a Guidance-Related Training (LAC, DLAC, INSET, Division, others) (2%)
    F. Conduct of activities for Adolescent Health (2%)
    G. Organized Peer Facilitators (2%)

    Summary of Rating:

    Multiplied by
    Criteria Rating Weight in Score
    Decimal
    I. Guidance Program / Work Plan / Action Plan (10%) 0.1
    II. Guidance Services and Programs (70%)
    A. Counseling / Coaching / Conference / Interview (20%) 0.2
    B. Inventory Record (10%) 0.1
    C. Homeroom Guidance Program (10%) 0.1
    D. Career Guidance (10%) 0.1
    E. Child Protection and Anti-Bullying (10%) 0.1
    F. Drop Out Reduction Program (10%) 0.1
    III. Physical Structure (10%) 0.1
    IV. Linkages (5%) 0.05
    V. Training of Guidance Counselor / Designate (5%) 0.05
    VI. Plus Factors (10%) 0.1
    TOTAL RATING

    _________________________________________
    Evaluator’s Signature Above Printed Name

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy