History: Art and The Criticism of Computer-Generated Images
History: Art and The Criticism of Computer-Generated Images
History: Art and The Criticism of Computer-Generated Images
Art Criticism
History of and the
Computer-Generated
Images
JamesElkins ABSTRACT
As thefieldof computer
graphics expands, ittendsto be
taughtina manner thatis increas-
inglyisolated fromthehistory of
In science, engineering and architecture it is of- aspect of my claim-that our ways art.Theauthor showshowcom-
ten said that computer graphics is an aid to visualization: it of thinking about space have also putergraphics canreconnect to
widersourcesof meaning inthree
helps us understand complicated shapes such as enzymes, the been changing. We have been arenas:(1)continuous traditions
trajectories of spacecraft, architecture and paintings. Behind moving awayfrom complexity and spanning Western painting and
this explanation is the notion that "spatialthinking," "visual- toward an ideal of rapid commu- contemporary rendering tech-
ization" and related capacities are more or less given-"hard nication and schematic clarity. niques,(2)linear perspective, and
wired" is the computer term-independently of history or of Our pictures are simpler, both in (3)
(3)drawing.
drawing. The
Thecomparisons
comparisons are
are
usedto demonstrate thatthehis-
the technology in question. Computer graphics only verifies the fine arts and in scientific illus- toryof artis intimately associated
that assumption when it produces calculated facsimiles of the tration. There is a practical rea- withtheexploration of computer-
world. There is truth to this, but I would like to argue that we son for this, since it is no longer assistedimagery, eventhough it
obtain it by ignoring the richer meanings that our computer- necessary to create complicated remains largely absentfromits
networks of lines in order to place pedagogy.
pedagogy.
generated pictures might have.
There are two intertwined components to this notion: one three-dimensional (3D) objects
has to do with history, the other with technology. Computer on flat surfaces (computers and
graphics is inextricably linked to the history of Western pic- photographs do that invisibly). But I do not want to imagine
ture-making. The expressive meanings, artistic strategies and practice as the enigmatic cause of the history of seeing. Artists
conventions of that genre continue to underwrite develop- and illustrators have been interested in avoiding intricate con-
ments in computer graphics, especially when they are not ac- structions in part because the way we imagine space itself has
knowledged. The result, I will suggest, is that we have come to changed. The lumpy, crowded spaces of Western painting
respond to our creations in an especially narrow way, exclud- have been replaced by the sheer, limitless spaces of contempo-
ing historical and expressive meanings or rewriting them as rary graphics.
matters of physics, neurophysiology or personal, ahistorical In each of these themes it is tempting to see a gradual im-
"artisticjudgment."
This would then be a reason to say that our discourse about James Elkins (educator), Department of Art History, Theory and Criticism, School of
the Art Institute of Chicago, 37 S. Wabash, Chicago, IL 60603, U.S.A.
pictures has changed since the advent of computers. I would Received 9 February 1993.
add that the gradual specialization of thinking about pictures
An abbreviated version of this paper was delivered at the joint meeting of the Ameri-
is a larger phenomenon bound up with modernism itself. But can Historical Association and the History of Science Society in Washington, D.C.,
it is also possible to argue-and this is the second, technical chaired by Barbara Stafford, in December 1992.
Fig. 1. Francisco de
Zurbaran, Bodeg6n Camb6,
oil on canvas, 0.5 x 0.8 m,
1633-1640 [24]. (Madrid,
Museo del Prado) Like
other simple, geometric
still lifes, Zurbaran's are
plausible historical ante-
cedents for contemporary
practices in computer
graphics. From Martin
Sebastian Soria, The Paint-
ings of Zurbardn(London:
Phaidon, 1953), Plate 13.
? 1994 ISAST LEONARDO, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 335-342, 1994 335
perspectivists tended . :
preting pictures have changed. But I do
not think that is entirely the case. I also not to emphasize the
sense of infinity so
want to explore some ways that both pic-
central to contempo-
tures and the space they posit have al-
rary virtual reality
tered along with the development of and other computer
computers. imaging.
The twentieth century has seen an ex-
ponential rise in the literature on space,
so much so that it would require a com-
pact monograph just to define the kinds
of space that have proliferated in psy-
chology, philosophy, physiology, art his-
tory and art practice. There is objective
space and subjective space, ideal space,
imaginary space, surveyor's space, ki-
netic space, psychological space and psy-
chophysiological space. There are meta-
phorical spaces, such as legal space,
institutional space and social space.
Each of these has been investigated us-