Historical Overview of Agricultural and Rural Development in China
Historical Overview of Agricultural and Rural Development in China
Historical Overview of Agricultural and Rural Development in China
DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA
L.X. Zhang
Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy
Chinese Academy of Sciences
ABSTRACT
This chapter looks at the various reforms in China since the 1950s and their impacts on
agricultural and rural development. Among other things, this chapter discusses the major
achievements of economic developments and the changing role of agriculture in the country.
In the last section, major challenges and opportunities are identified for the further
development of the agricultural sector in China.
Historical overview of agricultural and rural production would be a way to compensate for the
development in China weakness. The initial idea was to run some kind of
cooperative services in production in which small
For a long time after the founding of the Peoples households were formed to help each other during
Republic of China in 1949, China adopted the formal busy seasons. This kind of arrangement can be
Soviet model. This process of the adoption has gone categorized as labor exchange.
through several stages.
The second phase of the collective movement was the
Before 1949, Chinas economy was no different from concentration of all the medium and large sized farm
that of any other developing country, with respect to production tolls. Individual households were provided
private ownership of properties and private run with collective services for certain farm work. Not long
businesses. However, large disparities in living after this, an even larger scale of merging took place in
standards and access to resources pervaded society. This the rural areas. All lands owned by individual
was especially true in rural areas. Agrarian reform in households were merged under a collective land
the early 1950s enabled more than 80 per cent of the ownership. All means of production also became
rural poor households to gain access to land resources, collective. The commune system was established, under
which had been previously controlled by less than 20 which the production team was the smallest production
per cent of the wealthy. Until then, agricultural unit. The production brigade was at a level above and
production had been carried out by individuals in rural the commune was at a higher level still. Such a system
China. existed for nearly 30 years, until the late 1970s, when
the economic reforms started. Although there was
The collective movements started in the 1950s. The not much change in the institutional setting in rural
basic argument for the move was that small farms areas, major changes in agricultural policies did take
and individual households would not be able to cope place. The following table is a summary of the major
with natural disasters or other kind of shocks. Thus, political as well as agricultural policy changes before
a certain level of collective management in the reform.
1958-62 “Great Leap Forward” movement Compulsory commandism for demand and supply
No free market
Grain self-sufficiency for major agricultural products
1963-65 Readjustment period Very low prices for agricultural products
Commune system
Policies during 1963-65 similar to those in the early reform period
1966-78 Cultural revolution
Economic reforms were introduced in China in the late Fig. 1. Changes in structure of economy – GDP Percentage.
1970s. In rural areas, the reform process started with
the introduction of the household responsibility system. 90 –
80 –
The initial aims of the reforms were to expand
70 –
agricultural production, to diversify the rural economy,
60 –
to improve the rural standard of living and to promote
50 –
the innovation and diffusion of new technologies. The 40 –
40.0
major contents of the reform included: a) institutional 30 –
30.0 27.1
reform by the introduction of the household 20 – 17.7 16.0
responsibility system; b) marketing reform that freed 10 –
most agricultural commodities from Government 0–
1970 1980 1990 1999 2000
control, and brought about huge increases in the prices
of major agricultural commodities; and c) Agriculture Ind/Service
encouragement of rural sidelines, or other non-farming
activities, and allowing for labor mobility between
regions and between rural and urban areas. This was However, the basic characteristics of agriculture still
accompanied by changes in the political system in rural remains namely farms are all small scale with
areas. individual households operating the production
system. An important structural difference between
The reform shifted the Chinese economy from a Chinas agriculture sector and those from developed
planned system, to a market-oriented system and countries and many other developing countries is that
towards a more open economy. Consequently, there the agriculture sector in China is characterized by
was an overall improvement of the economy, which is an equitable distribution of cultivated land among
reflected in various indicators as shown in Table 2 and households. In essence, such a land tenure system
Fig. 1. provides rural households with a basic means of
2 Agricultural Development and the Opportunities for Aquatic Resources Research in China
Table 2. The annual growth rates (%) of China’s economy, 1970-2000.
Note: Figure for GDP in 1970-78 is the growth rate of national income in real term. Growth rates are computed using regression
method. Growth rates of individual and groups of commodities are based on production data; sectoral growth rates refer to
value added in real terms.
Source: Adapted from CCAP working paper (Huang and Rozelle 2001).
living, and so serves as a substitute for welfare and The majority of rural farmers are semi-subsistence.
insurance systems in the rural areas. While such an Although the performance in the agricultural sector has
arrangement may reduce production efficiency, it is been well recorded, the relative role of agriculture in
an important factor contributing to rural welfare and the national economy is changing. This is discussed in
social stability. the next section.
GDP Ag GDP
4 Agricultural Development and the Opportunities for Aquatic Resources Research in China
Table 3. Changes in structure percentage of China’s economy, 1970-2000.
Share in employment
Agriculture 81 69 62 60 52 50
Industry 10 18 21 21 23 22.5
Services 9 13 17 19 25 27.5
Share in Export
Primary Products Na 50 51 26 14 10
Foods Na 17 14 11 7 5
Share in Import
Primary Products Na 35 13 19 18 21
Foods Na 15 4 6 5 2
Source: Adapted from a CCAP working paper by Jikun Huang and Scott Rozelle, 2001.
to increase, but at the much slower pace of 3 per cent a The overall achievement in the economy brought
year. This was due mainly to the stagnation of significant reduction in rural poverty. The significant
agricultural production after the reforms. With non- reduction in the number of poor people, especially
farm income as an increasingly large proportion of rural during the first decade, was a fact widely recognized
income, the increase in overall income started to both at home and abroad. In China, poverty is
accelerate from 1990 and continued throughout the considered to be primarily a rural phenomenon
subsequent decade. (Fig. 6). According to Chinas official poverty lines,
Chinas rural poor decreased dramatically in the past
Fig. 5. Per capita rural income change. 20 years, from 260 million in 1978 to 128 million in
1984 (Fig. 7). After slowing down in the late 1980s, the
Per Capita Income rapid fall in the poverty head count continued in the
1100 1990s, declining to 42 million in 1998 and about 30
1000 million in 2000. The incidence of rural poverty (poor
Yuan per perron (1990 prices)
900
800
as proportion of rural population) also decreased
700 sharply during the period. The incidence of poverty
600
fell from 32.9 per cent in 1978 to 15.1 per cent in 1984,
500
400 and then to 3 per cent in 2000.
300
200
100
1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996
1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997
0.08
0.08 –
0.07 –
0.06 –
0.05
0.05 –
0.04 –
0.03 –
0.1 - 1.9 0.02 –
1.9 - 4.7 0.01 –
4.7 - 7.5
7.5 - 12.8 0–
12.8 - 27.4 1995 2030
Fig. 7. Rural poor as a percentage of rural population. Fig. 9. Trend of the fall in shallow groundwater tables.
Number of Rural Poor 74 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998
19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
200 20
150 30
100 40
50 50
0 Bailuobao Station (Feixiang Country)
1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 Jiuzhou Station (Ren Country)
1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997
Longhua Station (Baixiang Country)
6 Agricultural Development and the Opportunities for Aquatic Resources Research in China
Fig. 10. Gini coefficient. of investment in agricultural research has declined since
the early 1980s and reached the dangerously low level
of 0.44 in 1999. At the same time, the increasing
evidence of overlapping remits, inefficiency, over-
0.35
staffing, and inappropriate technology make
fundamental reform of the current research system an
0.3
essential task.
Index
0.25
Having discussed some issues and challenges above,
there are also opportunities associated with the WTO
0.2
1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 entry and development potentials with Government
1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 efforts. Studies have revealed that investment by the
Government still plays significant roles in promoting
the overall economic development. This is especially
true for investments in agricultural R&D and rural
Agricultural technology development has been education (Fig. 11). The questions related to it are how
regarded as the primary engine for economic to prioritize investment and how to encourage further
development and the major factor for poverty investment in agricultural R&D and rural education.
reduction. China has a strong agricultural research Also, various studies conclude that although grains, as
system that has generated technologies adopted by a land-intensive commodity, do not have a comparative
millions of farmers to meet the increasing demand of advantage in the world market, other commodities that
food and agricultural products in the most populous are more labor-intensive do. These commodities include
country in the world. All previous studies consistently livestock, horticultural as well as aquatic products. The
show that research-led technological change is the main key for all of these sectors is to improve the quality or the
engine of agricultural growth. Technology produced standards of the products. And the ultimate, overriding
by Chinas agricultural research system accounts for question is how to balance trade-offs between growth,
most of the rise in the total factor productivity of the poverty and environment in the development process.
cropping sector between 1980 and the late-1990s.
Despite this past record, China faces considerable References
challenges. Although, as a publicly funded agricultural
research system, it functioned well and addressed many Fan, S.L. Zhang and X. Zhang. 2002. Growth, Inequality,
and Poverty in Rural China: the Role of Public
important problems, its expenditures have been tied
Investments, IFPRI Research Report No.125,
to public budgets. Falling fiscal support has taken its International Food Policy Research Institute, April, 2002.
toll. Currently, there is much concern that the intensity Huang, J. and H. Ma. 2000. A Comparison of Production
Costs of Major Agricultural Products Between China and
the Main International Competitors, Chinese Rural
Economy (Chinese), No. 5 (2000): 17-21.
Fig. 11. Agricultural research investment intensity and Huang, J. and R. Hu. 2000. Agricultural R&D Investment
poverty by region in 1999. System and Pattern: Current Situation and International
Comparison, Management World (Chinese), No.3 (2000):
0.5 – –8 170-179.
▼7.3
0.45 – 0.43
–7
Huang, J. and S. Rozelle. 2001. Trade Liberalization, WTO
0.4 – 0.36 and Chinas Food Economy in the 21st Century: Larger,
0.33 –6
0.35 – 0.3 0.3 Modest, or Little Impacts?
–5
0.3 – 0.26
▼3.9 Huang, J., R. Hu, L. Zhang and S. Rozelle. 2000. The
0.25 – –4 Economy of Chinas Agricultural R&D Investment, China
0.2 – –3 Agricultural Press (Chinese), Beijing, 2000.
0.15 –
▼ –2 Wang, J., J. Huang and S. Rozelle. 2000. An Innovation of
0.1 –
0.05 –
1.3 –1 Property Rights in the Groundwater Irrigation System
0– –0 and Its Theoretical Explanation, Economic Research
Western Central Eastern Journal (Chinese), No.4 (2000): 66-74.
▼ Yao, S. and D. Colman, 1990 Oxford Agrarian Studies,
ARII: local ARII: total Poverty incidence
Vol.18, no.1, 1990, 23-34 p.