INTRODUCTION

The evolution and development of mankind began

thousands and thousands of years before. And today our intelligence,
our brain is a resultant of this long developmental phase.

Technology also has been on the path of development since

when man appeared. It is man that gave technology its present form.
But today, technology is entering a phase where it will out wit man in
intelligence as well as efficiency.

Man has now to find a way in which he can keep in pace

with technology, and one of the recent developments in this regard, is
the brain chip implants.

Brain chips are made with a view to enhance the memory

of human beings, to help paralyzed patients, and are also intended to
serve military purposes. It is likely that implantable computer chips
acting as sensors, or actuators, may soon assist not only failing
memory, but even bestow fluency in a new language, or enable
"recognition" of previously unmet individuals. The progress already
made in therapeutic devices, in prosthetics and in computer science
indicates that it may well be feasible to develop direct interfaces
between the brain and computers.

Dept. of CSE 1
 This technology is only under developmental phase,
although many implants have already been made on the human brain
for experimental purposes. Let’s take a look at this developing
technology.

EVOLUTION TOWARDS IMPLANTABLE BRAIN

CHIPS

Worldwide there are at least three million people living with

artificial implants. In particular, research on the cochlear implant and retinal
vision have furthered the development of interfaces between neural tissues
and silicon substrate micro probes. There have been many researches in order
to enable the technology of implanting chips in the brain to develop. Some of
them are mentioned below.

The Study of the Brain

The study of the human brain is, obviously, the most

complicated area of research. When we enter a discussion on this topic, the
works of JOSE DELGADO need to be mentioned. Much of the work taking
place at the NIH, Stanford and elsewhere is built on research done in the
1950s, notably that of Yale physiologist Jose Delgado, who implanted
electrodes in animal brains and attached them to a "stimoceiver" under the
skull. This device transmitted radio signals through the electrodes in a
technique called electronic stimulation of the brain, or ESB, and culminated in
a now-legendary photograph, in the early 1960s, of Delgado controlling a live
bull with an electronic monitor (fig-1).

Dept. of CSE 2
 Fig-1: A picture of Jose Delgado controlling a bull with the “stimoceiver”

According to Delgado, "One of the possibilities with brain

transmitters is to influence people so that they conform to the political system.
Autonomic and somatic functions, individual and social behavior, emotional
and mental reactions may be invoked, maintained, modified, or inhibited, both
in animals and in man, by stimulation of specific cerebral structures. Physical
control of many brain functions is a demonstrated fact. It is even possible to
follow intentions, the development of thought and visual experiences."

Delgado, in a series of experiments terrifying in their human

potential, implanted electrodes in the skull of a bull. Waving a red cape,
Delgado provoked the animal to charge. Then, with a signal emitted from a
tiny hand-held radio transmitter, he made the beast turn aside in mid-lunge and

Dept. of CSE 3
trot docilely away. He has [also] been able to “play” monkeys and cats like
“little electronic toys” that yawn, hide, fight, play, mate and go to sleep on
command. The individual is defenseless against direct manipulation of the
brain [Delgado, Physical Control].

Such experiments were done even on human beings. Studies in

human subjects with implanted electrodes have demonstrated that electrical
stimulation of the depth of the brain can induce pleasurable manifestations, as
evidenced by the spontaneous verbal reports of patients, their facial expression
and general behavior, and their desire to repeat the experience. With such
experiments, he unfolded many of the mysteries of the BRAIN, which
contributed to the developments in brain implant technology. For e.g.: he
understood how the sensation of suffering pain could be reduced by
stimulating the frontal lobes of the brain.

Delgado was born in Rondo, Spain, and interestingly enough he

is not a medical doctor or even a vet, but merely a biologist with a degree
from Madrid University. He, however, became an expert in neurobehavioral
research and by the time he had published this book (Physical Control of the
Mind ) in 1969, he had more than 200 publishing credits to his name. His
research was sponsored by Yale University, Foundations Fund for Research in
Psychiatry, United States Public Health Service1, Office of Naval Research2,
United States Air Force 657-1st Aero medical Research Laboratory3,
NeuroResearch Foundation, and the Spanish Council for Scientific Education,
among others.

Neural Networks:

Neural networks are loosely modeled on the networks of

neurons in biological systems. They can learn to perform complex tasks. They

Dept. of CSE 4
are especially effective at recognizing patterns, classifying data, and
processing noisy signals. They possess a distributed associative memory
which gives it the ability to learn and generalize, i.e., adapt with experience.

The study of artificial neural networks has also added to the data
required to create brain chips. They crudely mimic the fundamental properties
of the brain. Researchers are working in both the biological and engineering
fields to further decipher the key mechanisms of how man learns and reacts to
everyday experiences.

The physiological evidences from the brain are followed to

create these networks. Then the model is analyzed and simulated and
compared with that of the brain. If any discrepancy is spotted between the
model and the brain, the initial hypothesis is changed and the model is
modified. This procedure is repeated until the model behaves in the same way
as the brain.

When eventually a network model which resembles the brain in

every aspect is created, it will be a major breakthrough in the evolution
towards implantable brain chips.

Brain Cells and Silicon Chips Linked Electronically:

One of the toughest problems in neural prosthetics is how to

connect chips and real neurons. Today, many researchers are working on tiny
electrode arrays that link the two. However, once a device is implanted the
body develops so-called glial cells, defenses that surround the foreign object
and prevent neurons and electrodes from making contact.

Dept. of CSE 5
 In Munich, the Max Planck team is taking a revolutionary
approach: interfacing the nerves and silicon directly. "I think we are the only
group doing this," Fromherz said.

Fromherz is at work on a six-month project to grow three or four

neurons on a 180 x 180-transistor array supplied by Infineon, after having
successfully grown a single neuron on the device. In a past experiment, the
researcher placed a brain slice from the hippocampus of a monkey on a
specially coated CMOS device in a Plexiglas container with electrolyte at 37
degrees C. In a few days dead tissue fell away and live nerve endings made
contact with the chip.

Fig-2: The Max Planck Institute grew this 'snail' neuron atop an Infineon
Technologies CMOS device that measures the neuron's electrical activity,
linking chips and living cells.

Their plan is to build a system with 15,000 neuron-transistor

sites--a first step toward an eventual computational model of brain activity.

Dept. of CSE 6
 ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE FIELD

The achievements in the field of implantable chips, bio-chips,

so far are significant. Some of them are mentioned below:

Brain “Pacemakers”:

Researchers at the crossroads of medicine and electronics are

developing implantable silicon neurons that one day could carry out the
functions of a part of the brain that has been damaged by stroke, epilepsy or
Alzheimer's disease.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration have approved

implantable neurostimulators and drug pumps for the treatment of chronic
pain, spasticity and diabetes, according to a spokesman for Medtronic Inc.
(Minneapolis). A sponsor of the Capri conference, Medtronic says it is already
delivering benefits in neural engineering through its Activa therapy, which
uses an implantable neurostimulator, commonly called a brain pacemaker, to
treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease.

Surgeons implant a thin, insulated, coiled wire with four

electrodes at the tip, and then thread an extension of that wire under the skin
from the head, down the neck and into the upper chest. That wire is connected
to the neurostimulator, a small, sealed patient-controlled device that produces
electrical pulses to stimulate the brain.

These implants have helped patients suffering from Parkinson’s

disease to a large extent.

Dept. of CSE 7
 Fig-3: Computer chip model of neural function for implanted brain protheses

Retinomorphic Chips:

The famed mathematician Alan Turing predicted in 1950 that

computers would match wits with humans by the end of the century. In the
following decades, researchers in the new field of artificial intelligence
worked hard to fulfill his prophecy, mostly following a top-down strategy: If
we can just write enough code, they reasoned, we can simulate all the
functions of the brain. The results have been dismal. Rapid improvements in
computer power have yielded nothing resembling a thinking machine that can
write music or run a company, much less unlock the secrets of consciousness.
Kwabena Boahen, a lead researcher at the University of Pennsylvania's
Neuroengineering Research Laboratory, is trying a different solution. Rather
than imposing pseudo-smart software on a conventional silicon chip, he is
studying the way human neurons are interconnected. Then he hopes to build
electronic systems that re-create the results. In short, he is attempting to
reverse-engineer the brain from the bottom up.

Boahen and his fellow neuromorphic engineers are now

Dept. of CSE 8
discovering that the brain's underlying structure is much simpler than the
behaviors, insights, and feelings it incites. That is because our brains, unlike
desktop computers, constantly change their own connections to revamp the
way they process information. "We now have microscopes that can see
individual connections between neurons. They show that the brain can retract
connections and make new ones in minutes. The brain deals with complexity
by wiring itself up on the fly, based on the activity going on around it,"
Boahen says. That helps explain how three pounds of neurons, drawing hardly
any more power than a night-light, can perform all the operations associated
with human thought.

The first product from Boahen's lab is a retinomorphic chip,

which he is now putting through a battery of simple vision tests. Containing
nearly 6,000 photoreceptors and 4,000 synthetic nerve connections, the chip is
about one-eighth the size of a human retina. Just as impressive, the chip
consumes only 0.06 watt of power, making it roughly three times as efficient
as the real thing. A general-purpose digital computer, in contrast, uses a
million times more energy per computation as does the human brain.
"Building neural prostheses requires us to match the efficiency, not just the
performance, of the brain," says Boahen. A retinal chip could be mounted
inside an eyeball in a year or two, he says, after engineers solve the remaining
challenges of building an efficient human-chip interface and a compact power
supply.

Dept. of CSE 9
 Fig-4: This artificial eye contains working electronic versions of the
four types of ganglion cells in the retina. The cumbersome array of
electronics and optics surrounds an artificial retina, which is just
one-tenth of an inch wide.

Remarkable as an artificial retina might be, it is just a baby step

toward the big objective—reverse-engineering the brain's entire ornate
structure down to the last dendrite. A thorough simulation would require a
minutely detailed neural blueprint of the brain, from brain stem to frontal
lobes.

At Emory University – The Mental Mouse:

Dr. Philip R. Kennedy, an [sic] clinical assistant professor of

neurology at Emory University in Georgia, reported that a paralyzed man was
able to control a cursor with a cone-shaped, glass implant. Each [neurotrophic
electrode] consists of a hollow glass cone about the size of a ball-point pen tip.
The implants…contain an electrode that picks up impulses from the nerve
endings. Before they are implanted, the cones are coated with chemicals —
taken from tissue inside the patients’ own knees — to encourage nerve
growth. The implants are then placed in the brain’s motor cortex — which
controls body movement — and over the course of the next few months the
chemicals encourage nerve cells to grow and attach to the electrodes. A
transmitter just inside the skull picks up signals from the cones and translates
these into cursor commands on the computer.

Dept. of CSE 10
 Fig-5: Glass cone implants

The Lab-rat and The Monkey:

Rats steered by a computer…could soon help find buried

earthquake victims or dispose of bombs, scientists said [1 May 2002]. The
remote-controlled “roborats” can be made to run, climb, jump or turn left and
right through electrical probes, the width of a hair, implanted in their brains.
Movement signals are transmitted from a computer to the rat’s brain via a
radio receiver strapped to its back. One electrode stimulates the “feelgood”
center of the rat’s brain, while two other electrodes activate the cerebral
regions which process signals from its left and right whiskers. “They work for
pleasure,” says Sanjiv Talwar, the bioengineer at the State University of New
York who led the research team.… “The rat feels nirvana.” Asked to speculate
on potential military uses for robotic animals, Dr Talwar agreed they could, in
theory, be put to some unpleasant uses, such as assassination.

Photo of Remote-controlled rat

Dept. of CSE 11
 Scientists say they have developed a technology that enables a
monkey to move a cursor on a computer screen simply by thinking about it.…
Using high-tech brain scans, the researchers determined that small clump of
cells…were active in the formation of the desire to carry out specific body
movements. Armed with this knowledge, [researchers at the California
Institute of Technology in Pasadena] implanted sensitive electrodes in the
posterior parietal cortex of a rhesus monkey trained to play a simple video
game.… A computer program, hooked up to the implanted electrodes,…then
moved a cursor on the computer screen in accordance with the monkey’s
desires — left or right, up or down, wherever “the electrical (brain) patterns
tells us the monkey is planning to reach,” according to [researcher Daniella]
Meeker. [Dr. William Heetderks, director of the neural prosthesis program at
the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke,] believes that the
path to long-lasting implants in people would involve the recording of data
from many electrodes. “To get a rich signal that allows you to move a limb in
three-dimensional space or move a cursor around on a screen will require the
ability to record from at least 30 neurons,” he said.

Dept. of CSE 12
 BENEFITS OF IMPLANTABLE CHIPS

The future may well involve the reality of science fiction's

cyborg, persons who have developed some intimate and occasionally
necessary relationship with a machine. It is likely that implantable computer
chips acting as sensors, or actuators, may soon assist not only failing memory,
but even bestow fluency in a new language, or enable "recognition" of
previously unmet individuals. The progress already made in therapeutic
devices, in prosthetics and in computer science indicates that it may well be
feasible to develop direct interfaces between the brain and computers.

Computer scientists predict that within the next twenty years

neural interfaces will be designed that will not only increase the dynamic
range of senses, but will also enhance memory and enable "cyberthink" —
invisible communication with others. This technology will facilitate consistent
and constant access to information when and where it is needed.

The linkage of smaller, lighter, and more powerful computer

systems with radio technologies will enable users to access information and
communicate anywhere or anytime. Through miniaturization of components,
systems have been generated that are wearable and nearly invisible, so that
individuals, supported by a personal information structure, can move about
and interact freely, as well as, through networking, share experiences with
others. The wearable computer project envisions users accessing the
Remembrance Agent of a large communally based data source.

As intelligence or sensory "amplifiers", the implantable chip will

generate at least four benefits:

Dept. of CSE 13
 1) It will increase the dynamic range of senses, enabling, for
example, seeing IR, UV, and chemical spectra;
2) It will enhance memory;
3) It will enable "cyberthink" — invisible communication with
others when making decisions, and
4) It will enable consistent and constant access to information
where and when it is needed.

For many these enhancements will produce major improvements

in the quality of life, or their survivability, or their performance in a job. The
first prototype devices for these improvements in human functioning should
be available in five years, with the military prototypes starting within ten
years, and information workers using prototypes within fifteen years; general
adoption will take roughly twenty to thirty years. The brain chip will probably
function as a prosthetic cortical implant. The user's visual cortex will receive
stimulation from a computer based either on what a camera sees or based on
an artificial "window" interface.

Giving completely paralyzed patients full mental control of

robotic limbs or communication devices has long been a dream of those
working to free such individuals from their locked-in state. Now this dream is
on the verge of reality.

Dept. of CSE 14
 DRAWBACKS OF THE TECHNOLOGY

Ethical appraisal of implantable computer chips should assess at

least the following areas of concern: issues of safety and informed consent,
issues of manufacturing and scientific responsibility, anxieties about the
psychological impacts of enhancing human nature, worries about possible
usage in children, and most troublesome, issues of privacy and autonomy. As
is the case in evaluation of any future technology, it is unlikely that we can
reliably predict all effects. Nevertheless, the potential for harm must be
considered.

The most obvious and basic problems involve safety. Evaluation

of the costs and benefits of these implants requires a consideration of the
surgical and long term risks. One question, — whether the difficulties with
development of non-toxic materials will allow long term usage? — should be
answered in studies on therapeutic options and thus, not be a concern for
enhancement usages. However, it is conceivable that there should be a higher
standard for safety when technologies are used for enhancement rather than
therapy, and this issue needs public debate. Whether the informed consent of
recipients should be sufficient reason for permitting implementation is
questionable in view of the potential societal impact. Other issues such as the
kinds of warranties users should receive, and the liability responsibilities if
quality control of hard/soft/firmware is not up to standard, could be addressed
by manufacturing regulation. Provisions should be made to facilitate upgrades
since users presumably would not want multiple operations, or to be
possessors of obsolete systems. Manufacturers must understand and devise
programs for teaching users how to implement the new systems. There will be
a need to generate data on individual implant recipient usefulness, and
whether all users benefit equally. Additional practical problems with ethical
Dept. of CSE 15
ramifications include whether there will be a competitive market in such
systems and if there will be any industry-wide standards for design of the
technology.

One of the least controversial uses of this enhancement

technology will be its implementation as therapy. It is possible that the
technology could be used to enable those who are naturally less cognitively
endowed to achieve on a more equitable basis. Certainly, uses of the
technology to remediate retardation or to replace lost memory faculties in
cases of progressive neurological disease could become a covered item in
health care plans. Enabling humans to maintain species typical functioning
would probably be viewed as a desirable, even required, intervention,
although this may become a constantly changing standard. The costs of
implementing this technology need to be weighed against the costs of
impairment, although it may be that decisions should be made on the basis of
rights rather than usefulness.

Consideration also needs to be given to the psychological impact

of enhancing human nature. Will the use of computer-brain interfaces change
our conception of man and our sense of identity? If people are actually
connected via their brains the boundaries between self and community will be
considerably diminished. The pressures to act as a part of the whole rather
than as a single isolated individual would be increased; the amount and
diversity of information might overwhelm, and the sense of self as a unique
and isolated individual would be changed.

Since usage may also engender a human being with augmented

sensory capacities, the implications, even if positive, need consideration.
Supersensory sight will see radar, infrared and ultraviolet images, augmented

Dept. of CSE 16
hearing will detect softer and higher and lower pitched sounds, enhanced
smell will intensify our ability to discern scents, and an amplified sense of
touch will enable discernment of environmental stimuli like changes in
barometric pressure. These capacities would change the "normal" for humans,
and would be of exceptional application in situations of danger, especially in
battle. As the numbers of enhanced humans increase, today's normal range
might be seen as subnormal, leading to the medicalization of another area of
life. Thus, substantial questions revolve around whether there should be any
limits placed upon modifications of essential aspects of the human species.
Although defining human nature is notoriously difficult, man's rational powers
have traditionally been viewed as his claim to superiority and the center of
personal identity. Changing human thoughts and feeling might render the
continued existence of the person problematical. If one accepts, as most
cognitive scientists do, "the materialist assertion that mind is an emergent
phenomenon from complex matter, cybernetics may one day provide the same
requisite level of complexity as a brain." On the other hand, not all
philosophers espouse the materialist contention and use of these technologies
certainly will impact discussions about the nature of personal identity, and the
traditional mind-body problem. Modifying the brain and its powers could
change our psychic states, altering both the self-concept of the user, and our
understanding of what it means to be human. The boundary between me "the
physical self" and me "the perceptory/intellectual self" could change as the
ability to perceive and interact expands far beyond what can be done with
video conferencing. The boundaries of the real and virtual worlds may blur,
and a consciousness wired to the collective and to the accumulated knowledge
of mankind would surely impact the individual's sense of self. Whether this
would lead to bestowing greater weight to collective responsibilities and
whether this would be beneficial are unknown.

Dept. of CSE 17
 Changes in human nature would become more pervasive if the
altered consciousness were that of children. In an intensely competitive
society, knowledge is often power. Parents are driven to provide the very best
for their children. Will they be able to secure implants for their children, and if
so, how will that change the already unequal lottery of life? Standards for
entrance into schools, gifted programs and spelling bees – all would be
affected. The inequalities produced might create a demand for universal
coverage of these devices in health care plans, further increasing costs to
society. However, in a culture such as ours, with different levels of care
available on the basis of ability to pay, it is plausible to suppose that implanted
brain chips will be available only to those who can afford a substantial
investment, and that this will further widen the gap between the haves and the
have-not. A major anxiety should be the social impact of implementing a
technology that widens the divisions not only between individuals, and
genders, but also, between rich and poor nations. As enhancements become
more widespread, enhancement becomes the norm, and there is increasing
social pressure to avail oneself of the "benefit." Thus, even those who initially
shrink from the surgery may find it becomes a necessity, and the consent part
of "informed consent” would become subject to manipulation.

Beyond these more imminent prospects is the possibility that in

thirty years, "it will be possible to capture data presenting all of a human
being's sensory experiences on a single tiny chip implanted in the brain." This
data would be collected by biological probes receiving electrical impulses, and
would enable a user to recreate experiences, or even to transplant memory
chips from one brain to another. In this eventuality, psychological continuity
of personal identity would be disrupted with indisputable ramifications. Would
the resulting person have the identities of other persons?

Dept. of CSE 18
 The most frightening implication of this technology is the grave
possibility that it would facilitate totalitarian control of humans. In a prescient
projection of experimental protocols, George Annas writes of the "project to
implant removable monitoring devices at the base of the brain of neonates in
three major teaching hospitals....The devices would not only permit us to
locate all the implantees at any time, but could be programmed in the future to
monitor the sound around them and to play subliminal messages directly to
their brains." Using such technology governments could control and monitor
citizens. In a free society this possibility may seem remote, although it is not
implausible to project usage for children as an early step. Moreover, in the
military environment the advantages of augmenting capacities to create
soldiers with faster reflexes, or greater accuracy, would exert strong pressures
for requiring enhancement. When implanted computing and communication
devices with interfaces to weapons, information, and communication systems
become possible, the military of the democratic societies might require usage
to maintain a competitive advantage. Mandated implants for criminals are a
foreseeable possibility even in democratic societies. Policy decisions will arise
about this usage, and also about permitting usage, if and when it becomes
possible, to affect specific behaviors. A paramount worry involves who will
control the technology and what will be programmed; this issue overlaps with
uneasiness about privacy issues, and the need for control and security of
communication links. Not all the countries of the world prioritize autonomy,
and the potential for sinister invasions of liberty and privacy are alarming.
Nobody seems to intuitively have a problem with implantable devices for the
blind, deaf, and impaired. However, biochips may become a (literal) invasion
of privacy.

Dept. of CSE 19
 The Applied Digital Solutions "Guardian Angel" chip is
implanted in thousands of household pets. Recently, however, a surgeon
affiliated with the company implanted a chip in his arm and his hip to
demonstrate how people with pacemakers could be scanned from up to 4 feet
away.

Tracking stray cats was a promising beginning in the

implantable chip business, but dismayed by the potential flak from civil
libertarians, Applied Digital Solutions backed off from suggesting that its
chips be implanted in small children and elders with dementia; the company is
now marketing them (the chips, not the small children) as attachable devices.

Chips for pets haven't raised any hackles. But the idea of
injecting chips in humans disturbs anyone concerned about the shreds of
privacy we still hold. Implantable chips are the penultimate identifier, next to
DNA, which is what makes them scary. The technology isn't there yet, but it
will be. Future proposals to use chips to track prisoners, implantable devices
in the military to enhance the abilities of soldiers, and cyber implants allowing
information workers to communicate with machines will make current
concerns about digital privacy and medical information seem trifling. The
potential for totalitarian mind control may be far fetched, but future biobrain
implants could be like today's digital cable--all those channels, but nothing on.

In view of the potentially devastating implications of the

implantable brain chip should its development and implementation be
prohibited? This is, of course, the question that open dialogue needs to
address, and it raises the disputed topic of whether technological development
can be resisted, or whether the empirical slippery slope will necessarily result
in usage, in which case regulation might still be feasible. Issues raised by the

Dept. of CSE 20
prospect of implantable brain chips are hard ones, because the possibilities for
both good and evil are so great. The issues are too significant to leave to
happenstance, computer scientists, or the commercial market. It is vital that
world societies assess this technology and reach some conclusions about what
course they wish to take.

CHALLENGES FACED BY THE SCIENTISTS

Linking our bodies to machines isn't new. For example, millions

of Americans have pacemakers. Hawking depends on a machine to speak, as
he suffers from Lou Gehrig's disease, a degenerative disease of the nervous
system. However, chips and biosensors in development are beginning to blur
the line between in vitro and in silico. Implantable living chips may enable the
blind to see, cochlear implants can restore hearing to the deaf, and implants
might ameliorate the effects of Parkinson's or spinal damage. Thought-
operated devices to enable the paralyzed to manipulate computer cursors are
being tested.

Plenty of good may be accomplished with these inventions, but I

worry. Massively parallel biocomputers will consist of a puddle of cells in a
bioreactor. What will happen when your biocomputer gets the flu? And
"computer virus" will earn a whole new, literal meaning. (I don't even want to
think about the phrase, "The blue screen of death.") The potential downside to
biocomputing in the year 2030 may be eerily reminiscent of what often
happens to lunches stored in today's office fridge. If the power regulating the
temperature in the bioreactor gets cut off, or wild viruses infect the biofilm
coating your motherboard, or the office cleaning crew gets a little too
enthusiastic splashing the bleach around, your IT personnel will have to don
rubber gloves and hold their noses.

Dept. of CSE 21
 A researcher at Johns Hopkins University is using a collection
of VLSI chips to confirm new insights into how the neocortex of the human
brain unites information from the senses to create a coherent picture of the
world. Andreas Andreou of the university's Department of Computer Science
and Electrical Engineering has wired the chips together with optoelectronic
connections to build an image-processing module modeled on Boston
University neural theorist Stephen Grossberg's latest insights into brain
function.

Grossberg recently proposed what might be described as a "net-

centric" view of brain operation in which the communication channels
between the brain's processing modules perform a crucial blending of different
perceptual units. This view is essentially different from the conventional
model that likens brain operation to parallel processors found in digital
computers or analog distributed processing networks. Andreou is convinced
that the shift in emphasis from processor to network holds the key to solving
some of the difficult problems facing computer scientists.

"Despite the phenomenal success in engineering rudimentary

ears, eyes and noses for computers, our progress has not generalized to more
complex systems and harder tasks," Andreou said in a presentation at the
recent Critical Technologies for the Future of Computing conference, held last
month in San Diego. It is at the neocortex level of information processing,
where sensed information is assembled into a full picture, that current
technology seems to run into a brick wall.

The greatest challenge has been in building the interface

between biology and technology. Nerve cells in the brain find each other,
strengthen connections and build patterns through complex chemical signaling

Dept. of CSE 22
that is driven in part by the environment. Also, in a stroke patient, whose cells
are dying, we need to get surviving neurons to choose to interface with a
silicon chip. We also need to make the neural interface stable, so that walking
around or nodding doesn’t disrupt the connection.

Another challenge is to give completely paralyzed patients full

mental control over robotic limbs or communication devices. The brain waves
of such a person are very weak to accomplish this task.

Decreasing the size of the chip so that it can be implanted

subcutaneously, is yet another challenge. This will help the patient to adapt to
the implant more easily.

In July 1996, information was released on research currently

taking place into creation of a computer chip called the “Soul Catcher 2025.”
Dr. Chris Winter and a team of scientists at British Telecom’s Martlesham
Heath Laboratories, near Ipswich, are developing a chip that, when placed into
the skull behind the eye, will record all visual and physical sensations, as well
as thoughts. According to Winter, “This is the end of death… By combining
this information with a record of the person’s genes, we could recreate a
person physically, emotionally, and spiritually.”

Dept. of CSE 23
 CONCLUSION

"Neuroscience," wrote author Tom Wolfe in Forbes magazine a

couple years ago, "is on the threshold of a unified theory that will have an
impact as powerful as that of Darwinism a hundred years ago."

Wolfe is wowed by the combination of powerful imaging and

tracking technologies that now allow scientists not only to watch the brain "as
it functions"-- not only to identify centers of sensation "lighting up" in
response to stimuli, but to track a thought as it proceeds along neural
pathways and traverses the brainscape on its way to the great cerebral memory
bank, where it queues up for short- or long-term storage. Now that you know
what condition your condition is in, you know that such devices are only a
stopgap measure at best in the evolutionary story. The implants you get may
enhance your capabilities, but they will expire when you do, leaving the next
generation unchanged.

As we become more dependent on biotechnology, the standards

of what is "alive" will be up for grabs. Take a look at The Tissue Culture and
Art Project's semi living worry dolls, cultured in a bioreactor by growing
living cells on artificial scaffolds, or the Pig Wings project, which explores if
pigs could fly.

Deciding who or what, exactly, is human will be an incendiary

issue in the years to come as our genetic engineering technologies progress
and we go beyond implantables to actual germ-line genetic modification. We
are already creating chimerical creatures by combining genes from different
species. We will try to engineer improved human beings--not because we're so

Dept. of CSE 24
concerned about the intelligent machine life we are creating, but because we're
human, and it's embedded in our nature to explore, tinker, and create.

It will be several years before we see a practical application of

the technology we’ve discussed. Let’s hope such technologies will be used for
restoring the prosperity and peace of the world and not to give the world a
devastating end.

Dept. of CSE 25
 REFERENCES:

 http://members.tripod.com

 www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20020124S0026

 www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Bioe/BioeMcGe.htm

 www.mercola.com/2001/sep/12/silicon_chips.htm

Dept. of CSE 26
 CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. EVOLUTION TOWARDS IMPLANTABLE BRAIN CHIPS

 The Study of the Brain

 Neural Networks
 Brain Cells and Silicon Chips Linked Electronically

3. ACHIEVEMENTS

 Brain “Pacemakers”
 Retinomorphic Chips
 At Emory University – The Mental Mouse
 The Lab-rat and The Monkey

4. BENEFITS OF IMPLANTABLE BRAIN CHIPS

5. DRAWBACKS

6. CHALLENGES

7. CONCLUSION

8. REFERENCES

Dept. of CSE 27
 ABSTRACT

Computer scientists predict that within the next twenty years

neural interfaces will be designed that will not only increase the dynamic
range of senses, but will also enhance memory and enable "cyberthink" —
invisible communication with others. This technology will facilitate consistent
and constant access to information when and where it is needed.

The ethical evaluation in this paper focuses on issues of safety

and informed consent, issues of manufacturing and scientific responsibility,
anxieties about the psychological impacts of enhancing human nature, worries
about possible usage in children, and most troubling, issues of privacy and
autonomy.

Inasmuch as this technology is fraught with perilous

implications for radically changing human nature, for invasions of privacy and
for governmental control of individuals, public discussion of its benefits and
burdens should be initiated, and policy decisions should be made as to whether
its development should be proscribed or regulated, rather than left to
happenstance, experts and the vagaries of the commercial market.

The seminar initiated a discussion on the above topics, about

what all were the evolutionary events towards this technology, the
achievements attained till today in the field which included a number of
devices designed to help man to live a better life, the benefits of implanting

Dept. of CSE 28
chips, the disadvantages and drawbacks of using these prosthetic devices, and
the challenges being faced, which need to be dealt with.

Dept. of CSE 29