Facilities Management Information and Data Management
Facilities Management Information and Data Management
Facilities Management Information and Data Management
rics.org/standards rics.org/standards
Facilities management information and data
management
RICS information paper
1st edition (IP 25/2011)
Published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)
Surveyor Court
Westwood Business Park
Coventry CV4 8JE
UK
www.ricsbooks.com
No responsibility for loss or damage caused to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material included in this publication can
be accepted by the authors or RICS.
Produced by the Facilities Management Professional Group of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
ISBN 978 1 84219 7660
Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) December 2011. Copyright in all or part of this publication rests with RICS. No part of this work
may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means including graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or
Web distribution, without the written permission of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors or in line with the rules of an existing license.
Acknowledgments iv
RICS information papers 1
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Scope 2
1.2 Background 2
1.3 Information age and facilities management 3
2 Developing a facilities MI strategy 4
3 Defining facilities data and information requirements 5
4 Collecting facilities data from various sources 8
4.1 Sources of information 9
5 Analysing facilities data and management information 10
6 Reporting on facilities management information and data 12
7 Continuous improvement and innovation 13
8 Conclusion and summary 14
Appendices
1 Relationship modelling for key facilities stakeholders 15
2 Alignment to industry standards for reporting purposes 16
3 Reporting on facilities management information and data 17
Business drivers: refers to business demand by articulating the need; i.e. what information is needed to
achieve the business goals, e.g. customer service, safety, quality, growth, profit, environmental targets,
etc.
Scope and Targets: outlines scope that the deliverables are covered. Often MI strategies become
intrinsically linked to improvement projects. These may be to improve quality of services, enhance
facilities efficiency, competitiveness, accessibility to services based on user or stakeholder needs,
customer satisfaction, etc. as a few examples.
Governance and Information Handling Procedures: includes a defined and agreed set of principles for
the governance of the MI. For instance: security, ownership, accuracy, sanity, review, electronic
transmission rules, share of information guidance, and accessibility. For security of information, reference
and guidance from ISO 27001 Information Security Standards (BS7799-2 in the United Kingdom) can be
sought. Besides making information secure, procedures enable it to be readily accessible for those who
need it for operational or business purposes.
Technology: includes standard and type of technology that will be used – this often forms a
rationalisation to consolidate certain activity onto a standard technology toolset (e.g. a common
Computer Aided Facilities Management, data repositories, links with Enterprise Resource Systems, Space
Planning Tools and Software, etc).
People: covers people management, training standards and development
Costs: endeavours to set a cost for managing the information – this may often be in the form of a
business case or cost justification. The value gained by use of information should not exceed the cost of
its management, which may be measured in terms of cash or time.
Figure 4: A data mapping exercise – mapping existing facilities scope and definitions to industry-
standard scope
– Surveys (e.g. number of end users satisfied with Frequency Entries in a table contain frequency or
service). distributions. count of a value, event, or occurrences.
– Number of incidents over a period (e.g. number of
failures in a critical asset, security, health and safety
incidents).
– Average number of visits to a building over a month. Descriptive Means, standard deviations,
– Relation between building utilisation/NIA and service statistics. correlations demonstrating degree of
(e.g. cleaning) costs. relationship between two variables.
– Relation between closure of high priority jobs and
technician’s induction.
– Relation between customer experience and
satisfaction scores and changes in business/physical
environment.
– Predictive maintenance (possibility of asset failure Regression. Helps to understand how a dependent
under certain conditions). variable changes when any of the
– Maintenance cost of an asset over time (to make independent variables are changed.
replace or repair decisions).
– Explore impact of potential lower customer
satisfaction scores due to changes in service staff,
indoor air temperature, allocated space, lighting, etc.
rics.org/standards rics.org/standards