1726 Uniform Judicial System
1726 Uniform Judicial System
1726 Uniform Judicial System
This charter issued to the company by King George I on 24th Sept 1726.
This turns in the evolution of judicial institutions in the three presidency
towns.
The charter 1726 introduced uniformity of approach in each presidency
town, similar judicial systems was established.
The charter established civil and criminal courts in the presidency towns
which derived their authority not from the company but from the British
crown. These courts therefore designated as royal courts.
The status of courts prior to 1726 was very vague and indefinite.
The advantage of having royal courts in India was that their decisions were
authoritative as those of courts in England because the source of authority
for both the courts was the same.
Further, charter of 1726 initiated system of appeals from the courts in India
to the Privy Council in England and thus established a bridge between
English and the Indian legal systems.
MAYORS COURT-1726
The company’s Charter of 1687 established a Mayor’s Court at Madras. It
consisted of a Mayor, twelve Aldermen and sixty or more Burgesses. The first
Mayor and Aldermen were nominated by the Charter. The Mayor holds office for
one year. Aldermen elected the Mayor annually. The Mayor and Aldermen
selected Burgesses whose strength was not to exceed 120. The Mayor and three
Aldermen were to be English servants of the company and others were to be from
any nation.
A man learned law called Recorder was attacked to Mayor’s Court. (Court of
reward). The Mayor court tried,
All civil cases up to the value of 3 pagodas.
All criminal cases with the help of jury and punished the offenders by fine or
imprisonment.
Appeals were allowed to the Admiralty Court. In civil matters, the Admiralty
Court had decided more than the value of 3 pagodas. In criminal cases, it had
decided when the punishment was to lose life or limbs.
Appeals from the Mayor’s Court and Admiralty Court were heard by Governor and
Council.
The Charter of 1726 established Mayor’s Court at Madras, Bombay and Calcutta
consisted of a Mayor and 9 Aldermen. Mayor and 7 Aldermen were to be English
and the rest were subjects of princely Indian States friendly with Britain. The
Mayor holds office for one year. The Aldermen hold office for lifelong. Every
year the outgoing Mayor and Aldermen elected a new Mayor out of the Aldermen.
The Mayor and Aldermen filled up the vacancy of Aldermen from among the
inhabitants of the Presidency Town. The Governor in Council could dismiss the
Aldermen on reasonable ground.
This court tried only civil matters. It granted probation of wills and letters of
administration in case of intestate. During the proceedings the parties were
required to take oath produce and examine witnesses and plead their cases.
Sheriff was appointed by Governor and Council. It is his duty to produce the
defendant in the court if a written complaint was filed by an aggrieved party. He
executed judgments as in English Law.
Governor in Council heard appeals from the Mayor’s Courts up to the value of
1000 pagodas.
Privy Council:
If the value of the suit was more than 1000 pagodas a second appeal was permitted
to this court.