Scribd
Upload
435 views4 pages

Statistical Treatment Self Esteem

This document analyzes survey data from pregnant and non-pregnant teenagers. It provides demographic information like age, education level, and income for both groups. It also examines their levels of self-esteem using Rosenberg's scale. Statistical analysis shows pregnant teenagers have significantly lower self-esteem than non-pregnant peers. Based on these findings, the document proposes a personality development program called "Abante Babae!" to help female youth in the community.

Uploaded by

Christian Miranda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
435 views4 pages

Statistical Treatment Self Esteem

This document analyzes survey data from pregnant and non-pregnant teenagers. It provides demographic information like age, education level, and income for both groups. It also examines their levels of self-esteem using Rosenberg's scale. Statistical analysis shows pregnant teenagers have significantly lower self-esteem than non-pregnant peers. Based on these findings, the document proposes a personality development program called "Abante Babae!" to help female youth in the community.

Uploaded by

Christian Miranda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Statistical Treatment and Tables

1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of: look for mean and sd for age,
length of service and monthly salary – I don’t have the data eh?
a. Age (frequency, percentage, mean and sd) – Pregnant Teenagers

Age f %

13 to 15 10 26 %

16 to 20 29 74 %

Total 39 100%

a.2 Age (frequency, percentage, mean and sd) – Non-Pregnant Teenagers


Age f %

13 to 15 19 38 %

16 to 20 31 62 %

Total 50 100%

b. Educational level (frequency and percentage) – Pregnant Teenagers


Educational Attainment f %

Elementary level 2 5%

High School level 22 56 %

College level 15 39 %

Total 39 100%
b.2. Educational level (frequency and percentage) – Non-Pregnant Teenagers

Educational Attainment f %

Elementary level 0 0%

High School level 38 76%

College level 12 24%

Total 50 100%

c. Economic Status (I recommend Monthly Income not economic status) - Age (frequency,
percentage, mean and sd) Pregnant Teenagers

Monthly Net Income in Pesos F %

5,000 to 8,000 20 51 %

9,000 to 12,000 10 26 %

13,000 to 16,000 8 20 %

17,000 to 20,000 1 3%

Total 39 100%

c.2. Economic Status (I recommend Monthly Income not economic status) - Age (frequency,
percentage, mean and sd) Non-Pregnant Teenagers

Monthly Net Income in Pesos f %

5,000 to 8,000 24 48%


9,000 to 12,000 8 16%

13,000 to 16,000 3 6%

17,000 to 20,000 15 30%

Total 50 100%

2. What is the level of self-esteem among the respondents? (I scored this based on Rosenberg’s
Manual source: wwnorton.com/college/psych/psychsci/media/Rosenberg.htm
Scores between 26 and up (High)
15-25 (Average or Normal)
14 below (Low)

2.1.
Self-Esteem of Pregnant f %
Teens

Low 6 15.38%

Average 33 84.62%

High 0 0%

Total 50 100%

2.2
Self-Esteem of Non-Pregnant f %
Teens

Low 5 10%

Average 45 90%

High 0 0%

Total 50 100%
3. Are there any significant differences between the levels of self-esteem of pregnant teens in
comparison to non-pregnant teens. (Independent Samples t-test, we use only ANOVA for three
groups (you just have only 2 kaya t-test for independent samples)– you may want to explore the
relationship between self esteem and demographics – age, net income or educational attainment
–my wishful thinking)

Difference between Self-Esteem of Pregnant Teens to Non-Pregnant Teens

Variable N Mean SD t-cal t-crit df p Decision

Self Esteem of 39 16.56 1.83 -2.08 +/- 87 0.040384 Reject Ho


Pregnant Teens 1.9867

Self-Esteem of Non- 50 17.4 1.92


Pregnant Teens

The 39 pregnant teen’s self-esteem (M = 16.56, SD = 1.83) is significantly lower compared to


the self-esteem of 50 non-pregnant teens 28 participants (M = 17.4, SD = 1.92) demonstrated
significantly by their scores, t(87) =-2.08, p = .04.

4. What program can be designed and proposed to the Barangay San Isidro officials to help the
youth development?

Title:

Abante Babae!: A Personality Development Enhancement Program for Female Teenagers

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy