K01582 - 20180302121452 - Lab Manual
K01582 - 20180302121452 - Lab Manual
DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY
FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS
This course will offer you opportunities to improve your applied science skills in your
future undertakings. The goal of this class is for students to make scientific measurements
of some of the important chemical reactions occurring in foods.
Students successfully completing this class will:
1. Recognize the important reactions in food chemistry and their consequences.
2. Be familiar with methods to measure these reactions.
3. Be capable of reporting their results in an appropriate format.
4. Be capable of designing and conducting an experiment to understand a simple food
science problem.
More importantly, food science experiments very often do not work out as we planned. In
chemistry labs the chemicals are pure, the conditions are controlled and you can be
expected to get a “right” answer. In food science we often have poorly defined starting
materials and many reactions occurring in parallel under non-ideal conditions.
Unsurprisingly the data we get is often noisy and hard to interpret. Wherever you go in life
you will be trying to make difficult decisions on poor data. The machine is broken – you
don’t have a good schematic or time to pull it apart but its making a squeaking noise and
drawing too much power. Can you infer the cause and propose a solution without a more
thorough diagnosis? Developing this type of skill should be a benefit of this class.
Come to the lab prepared – know what you will be asked to do and have an idea of the
results you expect. Be observant – what do your samples look like? What do they smell
like? Do you think your measurement technique is capable of giving meaningful results for
your sample? Be thorough – record your observations. Make sure you get the data you
were asked for but note your other observations. Be imaginative – once you have your
observations can you construct a scientific explanation including not only what you
expected (and why) but also what happened (and why). Have fun – remember there isn’t a
final!
Academic Integrity: The measurements you make as a working scientist will be used by
yourself and others to make decisions that will affect the profitability of companies and the
lives of individuals. It is therefore essential that you truthfully and accurately report both
what you did and what you saw and measured. You are encouraged to work together
within your research group to conduct laboratory exercises and discuss the interpretation
of results but the actual presentation of the report is your individual responsibility and you
are not permitted to copy each others’ work.
Safety Considerations: You will be working with materials and techniques that could be
harmful to you and others in the lab. Instructors will attempt to inform you of unusual
• You must wear a lab coat, safety glasses, and close toed shoes at all times
• Dispose of waste carefully. Many reagents can be washed down the sink with plenty
of water but organic solvents and some other materials must be put in designated
storage bins for safe disposal. If in doubt, ask your instructor.
• Other classes use the lab. At the end of each exercise you must leave all your
glassware clean and put away and the bench surfaces cleaned down.
• No mouth pipetting
• Label all reagents (name/date/contents)
• No eating or drinking allowed in the laboratory
Pre-Labs. To get the most of the lab you must come prepared. This will include carefully
reading the lab manual and the relevant sections of food science textbook. You should
arrive at each lab knowing what you plan to do, why, and what results you can expect.
Page
References .............................................................................................................................................................. 32
Experiment 1.
(c) To each tube, using a dropping pipette, add three drops of iodine solution. Shake the
tube (sideways, not up and down) to mix the contents. Look for any colour changes apart
from the yellow colour of iodine itself. Copy the table below and record the results in your
notebook.
1% starch solution
1% albumen solution
water
1. The substances selected for testing are examples of three of the principle chemical
substances in cells, sugar (glucose), starch, protein (albumen). With which of these
substances did iodine react to give a colour change?
2. Does your result indicate that there is, for example, no sugar and no protein that
will give a colour change with iodine?
3. What experiments would you have to carry out in order to give a confident answer
to question 2?
4. Does the result indicate that starch will always react with iodine solution to give a
colour change?
5. What was the point of the water in tube 4?
PRECAUTION. Experiment 1 showed that the starch test is sensitive, so if you use a test-
tube for more than one experiment, make sure it is thoroughly cleaned out each time or
else traces of starch from one food sample may remain on the sides and give a positive
result for a sample which, in fact, contains no starch. For the same reason, the mortar and
pestle must be washed between each test.
(a) Label six test-tubes 1~6. Copy the table given below into your notebook.
(b) Crush a 1 cm cube, or equivalent quantity, of the first food sample in a mortar with
about 10 cm3 water (50mm in a test-tube).
(c) Pour the mixture into a clean test-tube and, using a test-tube holder, heat the mixture
in a small flame of a Bunsen burner till it boils for a few seconds, shaking the tube gently all
the time.
(f) Record your results in the table in your notebook and repeat the experiment with the
next food sample.
We can adjust the magnitude of the electrostatic interactions by titrating the protein
through its isoelectric point and the hydrophobic interactions by denaturing the protein.
Globular proteins can be thermally denatured by heating above a characteristic
temperature. The globule unfolds and exposed some of the hydrophobic core amino acids
to the aqueous solvent. If the structure does not regenerate, there will be a pressure to
aggregate to reduce the hydrophobic interaction. Based on these simple rules of protein
behavior we can try to understand the functional properties of whey proteins in film.
Firstly to form a solid gel, a protein must aggregate and form a continuous (i.e.,
percolating) structure throughout the container. This can be seen as a partial precipitation
of the protein because there are strong protein-protein interactions yet not so strong that
they exclude interaction with solvent.
Experiment 1. The test for protein
4. Add to this about 5 mm dilute copper sulphate solution. Shake the tube sideways to
mix the contents.
5. Return the tubes to the rack, leave for a few seconds and record the resulting
colours in your notebook.
Table 1.
* CARE. Sodium hydroxide is caustic and dissolves clothing, skin and bench tops. It is
destructive rather than dangerous so if any is spilt on the bench, neutralize it at once with
an equal volume of dilute hydrochloric acid and wipe dry. If spilt on clothing do the same
but follow with a wash in as much water as possible. If spilt on the skin do not add acid but
wash under the tap until the 'soapy' feeling is removed.
Discussion
1. The substances selected for testing are examples of three of the principal types of
chemical substances in cells; starch, sugar (glucose), protein (albumen).
2. With which of these samples did the reaction give a purple colour ?
3. The substance which gave a purple colour was a single example of its class of
substances. Would you expect all other samples of this class to give the same reaction?
NOTE This test is called the ‘biuret’ test. ‘Biuret’ is the name of the compound which gives
the purple colour.
In Part 1, you will precipitate casein from milk using an acid. This method is used to make
cottage cheese. In Part 2, you will coagulate casein from milk using the enzyme rennin. This
method is used for manufacturing cheese. In Part 3, you will coagulate soy protein from
soymilk, using magnesium sulfate. This method is used to make tofu.
Materials Required
Distilled white vinegar (acetic acid), 5% acidity
Hot plate/Bunsen burner
Pasteurized whole milk
Beakers
Soymilk
Graduated cylinder
Rennet tablets (Junket)
Balance
Epsom salt (magnesium sulfate)
Thermometer
Cheesecloth
Foil
Rubber bands
Hammer
Stirring rod/wood Popsicle sticks
Eyedroppers
Heatproof gloves
Heatproof pad
Weigh boats
Experimental Procedure
1. Weigh the empty beaker and record the weight. Weigh and record the weight of 120
milliliters (1/2 cup) of milk in the beaker. Record the weight of the milk in the data
table (weight of beaker with milk – weight of beaker = weight of milk).
2. Place the beaker with the milk on a hot plate. Heat the milk to 21°C (70°F). Turn off
the hot plate and remove the beaker.
3. Add 11 milliliters (2 teaspoons) of vinegar to the warm milk and stir for 2 minutes,
then allow the milk to sit for 5 minutes. The casein will precipitate into heavy white
curds.
4. Cut out a piece (2-3 layers) of cheesecloth large enough to cover the top and 2
inches down the sides of a beaker. Using the rubber band, fasten the cheesecloth
over the top of the beaker. Pour the curdled milk into the beaker, collecting the
curds (casein) in the cheesecloth and allowing the vinegar and whey to drain off
into the bottom of the beaker.
6. Squeeze the casein until almost dry, then spread out the cheesecloth to let the
casein dry for 5 minutes.
7. Weigh the precipitate. (Do not weigh the cheesecloth with the precipitate). Record
your results.
1. Place 1/2 of a crushed rennet tablet into a beaker. To crush the tablet, place it
between two pieces of foil and hit the tablet with a hammer.
2. Weigh the empty beaker and record the weight. Weigh and record the weight of 120
milliliters (1/2 cup) of milk in the beaker. Record the weight of the milk in the data
table (weight of beaker with milk – weight of beaker = weight of milk).
3. Place the beaker with the milk on a hot plate. Heat the milk to 43°C (110°F). Pour
the hot milk over the rennet tablet, stir for 2 minutes, and allow the milk to sit on
the lab bench for 5 minutes.
4. Collect the curds by pouring the curds and liquid into a beaker covered with
cheesecloth (2-3 layers) (see step 4 in Part 1). Gather up the cheesecloth and
squeeze out the liquid whey from the curds. Spread out the cheesecloth to allow the
curds to dry for 5 minutes.
5. Weigh the curds. (Do not weigh the cheesecloth with the curd.) Record your results.
Variations:
Test the effect of low temperature on the activity of rennet. Repeat the experiment with
cold milk at 4°C (40°F). Record your results.
Test the effect of high temperatures on the activity of rennet. Repeat the experiment with
hot milk heated to 70°C (160°F). Record your results.
1. Weigh the empty beaker and record the weight. Weigh and record the weight of 120
milliliters (1/2 cup) of soymilk in the beaker. Record the weight of the soymilk in
the data table (weight of beaker with soymilk – weight of beaker = weight of
soymilk).
3. Bring the soymilk to a boil and turn off the heat. Monitor this step closely; do not
allow the soymilk to boil over the top of the beaker.
6. Fasten a piece (2-3 layers) of cheesecloth over the top of a beaker with a rubber
band. Pour the soy curds and liquid into the beaker, collecting the curds in the
cheesecloth and allowing the liquid to drain into the bottom of the beaker.
7. Gather up the cheesecloth and squeeze out as much water as possible. Spread out
the cheesecloth to allow the curds to dry for 5 minutes.
8. Weigh the curds. (Do not weigh the cheesecloth with the curd.) Record your results.
Variations:
Test to see if rennet can coagulate soy protein. Add 1/2 rennet tablet to 120 milliliters (1/2
cup) of warm soymilk (43°C). Record your results.
Test to see if Epsom salt can coagulate casein. Add 1.6 grams (1/4 teaspoon) of Epsom salt
to 120 milliliters (1/2 cup) of boiled milk. Record your results.
Questions
1. Compare the weights of the curds from the milk (acid and rennet) with that from
the soymilk.
2. Why did the casein that was coagulated with the rennet weigh more than the casein
that was precipitated with the acid?
3. Compare the amount of acid casein precipitated from the whole milk with the
amount of soy protein coagulated from the soymilk. How do your results compare
with the Nutrition Facts label for each product?
2 Alcohol alone 4
CLEANING THE TUBES. Keep the oily tubes separate from the others and clean them with
hot water and liquid detergent.
Discussion
1. What was the only difference between the contents of tubes 1 and 2 ?
2. What was the visible difference between tubes 3 and 4 after adding the contents of
tubes1 and 2 to the water in them?
3. How would you attempt to explain the appearance of the liquid in tube 3?
4. What difficulties can you foresee in using this test with samples which contain both
lipids and water?
5. Water and alcohol mix in all proportions. What precautions must be taken in
selecting the alcohol for use in this experiment and why is this precaution
necessary?
6. How would you design an experiment to find out the sensitivity of this test for fats?
Experimental Procedure
Chocolate chips
Potato chips
Sunflower seeds
Chocolate
chips
Potato
chips
Sunflower
seeds
(weight of beaker with raw food) – (weight of beaker) = weight of raw food
(weight of beaker with raw food) – (weight of beaker with dried food) = weight lost from food
(weight lost from food / weight of raw food) x 100 = % lipid extracted
Chocolate chips
Potato chips
Sunflower seeds
Questions
1. How can you tell that the dark wet spot on the paper towel is fat and not water?
2. Rank from most to least the percentage of lipid extracted from all three foods. Look
at the Nutrition Facts label on the packages of all three foods and rank them. Did
your ranking agree with the ranking of the product labels?
3. Determine which lipids contained saturated and unsaturated fatty acids in this
experiment, based on your descriptions of the fats in the Petri dishes.
*Note. The acid in the fruit juice may turn the DCPIP from blue to red but it is the point at
which the dye becomes colourless which counts. Coloured fruit juices, however, will not
give a colourless solution. The end point is when the blue (or red) colour disappears and
the original colour returns.
Eye protection
Conical flask (100 cm3)
Boiling tube
Measuring cylinder (50 cm3)
Access to a balance (1 dp)
Cotton wool
Sticky labels
Warm water 30–40 °C
Glucose (Low Hazard), 5 g
Yeast (as fast acting as possible), 1 g
Limewater
Procedure
1. A source of warm water is required. Larger conical flasks can be used, but this
dilutes the carbon dioxide concentration, and makes testing for carbon dioxide with
limewater more difficult.
2. Put 5 g of glucose in the conical flask and add 50 cm3 of warm water. Swirl the flask
to dissolve the glucose. (Fig.1)
3. Add 1 g of yeast to the solution and loosely plug the top of the flask with cotton
wool.
5. Remove the cotton wool and pour the invisible gas into the boiling tube containing
limewater. Take care not to pour in any liquid as well.
6. Gently swirl the limewater in the boiling tube and note what happens.
1. Remove the cotton wool and note the smell of the solution.
2. Carefully decant or filter the solution into your distillation flask. (Significant
quantities of yeast will produce foaming and this can be carried over into the
product.)
3. Collect the fraction between 77–82 °C. (Ethanol boils at 78 °C.) This fraction should
burn easily compared with the non-flammable original solution.
4. The ethanol must be burnt or poured away immediately. It must not be kept or
used.
Figure 2
Yeast has an enzyme called zymase and this catalyses the fermentation process.
You are provided with a boiling tube containing a suspension of yeast in a solution of
glucose. DO NOT SHAKE THE TUBE at any stage of the experiment.
1. Set up a clamp stand, clamp, tripod, gauze and water bath as shown in Fig. 3. Clamp
the boiling tube securely in the water bath.
2. Fit the manometer and syringe assembly as shown in the diagram ensuring that the
bung makes an air-tight seal in the mouth of test- tube and the tap is open (turned
upwards).
Coloured liquid
termometer
Figure 3
3. Use a dropping pipette to fill the reservoir of the manometer about three quarters
full of coloured liquid. If the liquid does not flow into the capillary, close the tap
(horizontal) and raise the syringe plunger. Air bubbles in the column can be
expelled by using the syringe to push the liquid and trapped air back to the
reservoir.
4. Turn the tap downwards, push the syringe plunger to the bottom of the barrel and
open the tap (vertically upwards). Move the marker on the capillary tube to indicate
the level of liquid.
5. Record the temperature of the water bath, note the time and close the tap
(horizontal). Leave the tap closed for one minute and keep withdrawing the syringe
plunger to bring the liquid back to the marker. After one minute bring the liquid
level exactly back to the mark, open the tap (upwards) and record in your table the
volume indicated on the syringe.
Prior to the end of WWII (1945) frozen food was a rarity and far too expensive for the
common folk (who didn't have a freezer to put it in anyway). While canning had been
around since the early 1800's, its mechanism of preservation was not understood nor was
the significance of the canning temperature appreciated until the late 1800s. The bottom
line is that a lot of ate a lot of rather bad food; stuff we would today gag at and toss in the
nearest dumpster.
Maintaining a safe food supply is a never ceasing struggle. It was only since the 1930s
when a book by Sinclair Lewis exposed the filthy conditions in the country's slaughter
houses that the Federal Government (USA) began to regulate food safety. Even today there
are those who feel that our food supply is over regulated and that there is little reason for
concern about the safety of our food supply. What do you think? Many of you have worked
in the food service industry. Do you think that removing the safety rules and regulations
would result in a significant change in the quality of our food?
In the past few years the Northwest region has suffered more than its share of serious food
borne bacterial disease caused by a new strain of E. coli, O157:H7. This virulent pathogen
has killed many people and left a number severely injured for life. This bacterium has been
found most commonly in ground meats like hamburger. However, it has also been detected
in a variety of other foods including apple cider, fruit juices and produce. Although a lot of
research has been done to pinpoint the source of this organism, it is still not known. Beef
cattle seem to be one of the prime carriers of E. coli, O157:H7, but other animals may also
be involved. The danger is such that anyone who eats poorly cooked ground meat must
be considered at risk for contracting this disease.
Most of you have been told by your mother to store foods in the refrigerator and to wash
your hands before handling food, either for eating or in preparing them. In this exercise
you will estimate the bacterial contamination in some hamburger purchased at a local
supermarket. You will see the effect on improper storage on the numbers of bacteria in the
food and you will observe how high salt or sugar concentrations inhibit the growth of
many bacteria.
Below are some microbes associated with food; some good, some very bad characters.
Materials
Procedure:
1. Obtain a 1:10 dilution of the sample of the hamburger from the instructor (20 gm +
180 ml of sterile water). Record the history of the samples; a sample that has been
stored in the refrigerator since its purchase and the other sample that was left out
at room temperature overnight.
2. Obtain, per pair, 4 plates of count media, a 100 ml dilution blank, disposable plastic
pipettes, a spreading rod and a beaker of ethanol.
4. Remove 1.0 ml from the 1:10 sample and transfer it into the dilution bottle and mix
thoroughly. This will give you a 1:1000 dilution of the original sample.
5. Place the dilutions on the respective plates. Work backwards starting with the
MOST HIGHLY diluted sample first.
o Add 0.1 ml of the sample from the dilution bottle (1:1000 dilution) to the
center of the #4.4 plate (1:10,000 dilution) and then 1.0 ml of the same
sample to the #4.3 plate (1:1,000 dilution). Using the same pipette repeat
the process with the UNDILUTED sample to the #4.2 & #4.1 plates
respectively.
6. Remove the glass spreading rod from the ethanol breakers and pass it through the
flame. DO NOT HOLD IT IN THE FLAME. The ethanol will catch fire. Allow it to
burn off AWAY FROM THE BEAKER. Hold it for about 30 seconds until it cools.
7. Successively spread the plates in EXACTLY the following order: the 1:10,000 plate
first; the 1:1,000 plate second; the 1:100 plate third and the 1:10 plate last. Do not
flame the spreading rod between plates.
8. Incubate the cultures at 37oC until the next lab and then count the number of
colonies per plate. Plates with greater than 300 isolated colonies are to be labelled
TNTC (= Too Numerous To Count). Prepare a table relating the dilution to the
number of colonies and calculate the number of bacteria per gm in the original
sample. Place your result on the board with your team names under the appropriate
sample heading. Compared your results with others testing the same sample and
with the results from the other sample.
1. Obtain 4 broth tubes per pair with the following concentrations of salt or sugar:
Salt- 0, 1%, 5%, 15% or sugar- 0, 5%, 25%, 50% (percentage by weight; i.e. for a
50% sugar solution add the dried medium (for 100 ml of medium) to 50 gm of
sucrose and add enough water to bring the solution to 100 ml final volume).
3. Inoculate each tube with 10 drops of the original meat suspension (allow the large
chunks of meat to settle out first).
4. Mix well.
6. Estimate the amount of growth in each tube following incubation, assuming that the
growth in the control tube was 4+ and no growth is (-).
1. Explain why cuts of meat like steak are not considered as dangerous for bacterial
infection as is hamburger.
2. What are the symptoms of E. coli, O157:H7 infection?
4. How can you tell if your hamburger is cooked properly? (Sending it to a lab for
testing is not the correct answer)
5. Using information LEARNED PREVIOUSLY in the course, determine how you might
test specifically for E. coli, O157:H7 bacteria in the meat so that you could rapidly
detect only a few 100 bacteria per gram?