Preferences and Indifference Curves
Preferences and Indifference Curves
Table of Contents:
1. Introduction
2. Preferences
2.1 Axioms of Preferences
2.1.1 Complete
2.1.2 Reflexive
2.1.3 Transitivity
3. Utility
3.1 assigning utility
3.2 Positive Monotonic transformation
3.3 total and marginal utilities- one good case
4. Indifference Analysis
4.1 Well behaved Indifference curve
4.2 Properties of Indifference curves
4.2.1 Negatively sloped
4.2.2 Thinner lines
4.2.3 Convexity
4.2.4 Indifference curves don’t intersect
4.3 Well behaved preferences and Indifference curves
4.4 satiation point
4.5 Marginal Rate of Substitution
4.6 Special cases of preferences and their indifference curves
4.6.1 Neutral good
4.6.2 Perfect substitutes
4.6.3 Perfect Compliments
4.6.4 Cobb Douglas Preferences
4.6.5 Discrete goods
5. Summary
6. Exercises
7. Glossary
8. Appendix
9. References
Learning Outcomes:
After studying this chapter, a student should be able to:-
1. Introduction
Consumers are rational decision makers in the sense they know their preference over goods
and buy goods that get them maximum satisfaction. In this chapter we will assume
consumers to be rational and study preferences and utility derived from various bundles of
commodities. Only difference between actual consumer in the market and our study is that
here we would have calculus applied to the situations consumer faces in the market.
This chapter is divided into three sections. First section covers axioms of preferences. In the
second section, utility function is derived. In the last section, indifference curves are
detailed at length.
2. Preferences
If I ask you, what would you like to have in dinner: fried rice or chowmien? I would receive
three of these answers: (a) fried rice, (b) chowmein, (c) either of these. Irrespective of your
answer choice, I would conclude something about your preferences either you like fried rice
over chowmein or chowmein over fried rice or like both equally. As in this example
commodities are ordered/ranked so could be bundles of commodities.
Let us understand the notation used for it. ’>’ symbol is used when one bundle is strictly
preferred over other.’~’ symbol is used when two bundles give equal level of satisfaction to
the consumer. When consumer prefer or is indifferent between two bundles over other and
≥ symbol is used to compare two same bundles.
2.1.1 .Complete
Axiom of completeness states that two bundles can be compared. Assume two bundles 1
and 2; both comprising of gods x and goods y.
2.1.2 Reflexive
If a bundle is as good as itself then it follows reflexive. For example: a cold drink bottle on
left is as good as on the right. Both the bundles contain one cold drink bottle. For kid, this
sort of assumption could seen invalid but not for adult, at least.
2.1.3 Transitivity
If bundle 1 is preferred over bundle 2 is preferred over bundle 3. Suppose you prefer
studying in India over US and US over Australia, then it seen that given all three choices,
you must choose India
Example 1
Consider the following binary relation defined over where x is set of human beings. Check if
each of these relations satisfies reflexivity, completeness and transitivity.
A is at least as tall as B could be used in first & third instance or B is at least as tall as a
can be used is second & third instance. Since, this relation helps is comparing A & B. This
relation is complete.
This relation is not complete since is third case of same height this relation last be used. It
is not reflexive since A can’t be taller than her/herself.
If A is taller than B & B is taller than C then it follows that A is taller than C. So this
relation is transitive.
3. Utility
In the last section, consumer preferences were
Did You Know??
discussed, where in at a time two consumption
Utility is a concept that was
bundles were compared & ordered (ranked).
Indifferent, strictly preferred and weakly preferred,
introduced by Daniel
all are binary relationships defined over bundles of Bernoulli. He believed that
commodities. It would be easy if we cold assign for the usual person, utility
numeric values to the bundles in such a manner increased with wealth but at
that preserve the ordering of bundles.1 Preserving a decreasing rate.
the order of consumption bundles, refer to
assigning higher value to preferred bundle than
less-preferred bundles.
U: (x,y) →
a) Ordinal Utility
As the name suggests, ordinal is, only order mattes. Utility can be assigned to
different consumption bundles irrespective of the magnitude, as long as the ordering
of preference is maintained for a particular consumer. For ex: A consumer prefers
Bundle 1 to bundle 2 then, Utility assigned to bundle 1 can be 1, 10 or 1000
provided that every time bundle 2 has “7” and bundle 3 has 90 , then it could be
inferred that bundle 3 is most preferred bundle, nest to it is bindle 1 and least
preferred one is bundle 2 . But it cannot be inferred from the above information
that bundle 3 is 9 times better bundle than bundle 1.
b) Cardinal Utility
There are economists who hold that magnitude of utility is of significance. This is the
known as cardinal utility assignment to consumption bundles.
If is above example, it cold be said with precision that utility of bundle 1 is 10 and of
bundle 3 is 90 : then it means consumer like bundle 3 times be drawn if consumer is
ready to pay nine times the price of bundle 2, for bundle 3.
1
Here axiom of transitivity should be followed for consistency of values assigned.
Example:
1 9 3000 18 -18
2 10 4000 20 -20
3 11 5000 22 -22
In column 2, bundles are given utility in two digit column 3 bundle 1-3 are assigned utilities
in thousand but order of preference is bundle 3,2 and 1.U 1 and U2 are ordinal utilities where
preference of order is important. In column 4, positive monotonic transformation of U1
function is computed by doubling U1. This does not alter the order of preferences of bundle
1-3.But a negative monotonic transformation represented in column 5 by (-2 U1), reverse
the order of preference. Least preferred bundle 1 becomes most preferred; as -18 is greater
than -20 and -22.
When more of good is consumed ,total utilities goes on increasing .Ask yourself, would you
prefer two pair of shoes or one ?obviously , your answer would be two. But, when you buy
first shoe its utility is highest became that one is first one in your wardrobe. Another one
Later, the marginal-utility theory of value resolved the paradox. Water in total is much
more valuable than diamonds in total because the first few units of water are necessary
for life itself. But, because water is plentiful and diamonds are scarce, the marginal value
of a pound of diamonds exceeds the marginal value of a pound of water. It can be
assumed that for water we are at a point on MU curve at higher quantity and for
diamonds we are still at a point with less of Diamond (i.e. commodity on x-axis) is
consumed.
have some utilities but obviously less than first one and so on .These two argument are
consistent since former is in relation to total utility and latter to marginal utility. Total utility
always increase with increase in number of units consumed. While addition made to this
total utility falls.
x2-x1
If x2>x1, then U(x2)>U(x1), hence marginal utility is positive. Though it falls if x2 increases
to x32 that is MU’ is smaller than MU measure, where MU’ is
given by
MU'=U(x3)-U(x2)
x3-x2
There could be various consumption bundles amongst which a consumer is indifferent .For
example two serving of rice with three chapattis could give same satisfaction as three
serving of rice with two chapattis .All such a combination give same fixed level of utility to
2
Please see appendix to this chapter for the calculus treatment of it.
Let us assume that the above curve is locus of all consumption bundles at which consumer
has some constant utility throughout. There are upward sloping and downward sloping
sections3 of our assumed indifferent curve. A positively sloped indifferent curve would mean
that more of both commodities like at point B and less of both commodities like at point C
3
BC ,DE are upward sloping section and AB,CD, and downward sloping section of indifference curve here.
both commodities; give same level of utility to consumer. But is it consistent? No, strictly
more of both commodities should add utility for the consumer.4
So, now our indifferent cure would not be upward sloping. We can now have only indifferent
curve which is downward sloping .A downward sloping indifferent curve mean that as we
move along the indifference curve from point C to point D (in figure 3) would mean more of
goods x with less of goods y. So good y is sacrificed so that addition made to utility from
extra consumption of x, is equivalent to loss of utility due to reduction of y. CDE is
negatively sloped 5 but with D as point of inflexion6.
CD section of assumed indifference curve is convex to the origin while DE section is concave
to the origin.
Now, next have to examine whether indifference cure need be convex or concave or could
be both.Let us examine concave section DE, first. In figure 4, on x-axis change in units of x
is assumed to be 1 unit and change in y is due to change in x.
4
Though addition made would be declining (due to diminishing marginal utility), but both add to positive utilities.
Unless either good becomes ‘bad’, this is discussed in sections to come.
5
You can check its slope as negative or downward by drawing tangent at various points.
6
Point of inflexion is a point at a curve from where the curvature of a curve changes.
To increase consumption of x by 1 unit, change in y (along DE) goes on increasing. But from
our knowledge of marginal utility, marginal utility of a good is high at lower levels of
consumption and low at higher levels of consumption. So as we move from point 1 to 2 and
further towards E ; loss of marginal utility from reduced y is greater than additional of
marginal utility from increased x. The reason for the same being y is lost at greater pace
than addition made to x .So, indifference curve cannot be concave7.
Indifference curve, so assumed in figure 1 had a thicker section GHI reconstructed here. It
can have bundles 1 and 2 and many such bundles. Here bundle 2 contains more of both
goods compared to bundle 1 and hence have higher utility.8 So, assumption that these
points are on same indifference curve is violated.
7
Concave indifference curve can be observed and will be explained in coming sections.
8
This property is known as assumption of monotonicity.
So, indifference curve sections excluded from our assumed shape of indifference curve are
4.2.3 Convexity:
Indifference curve must be convex. Convexity would imply that fall in y- accompanied with
increase in x- should get smaller as more of x is added. Look at the following two diagrams
and the explanation that follows.
At point 1 on Indifference curve I0 ,x1 of x and y1 of y is consumed that yields utility of level
I0. Panel B of figure 6 shows corresponding utility achieved from these consumptions. When
one moves to point A, consumption of y decrease to y 2 and of x increases to x2.This leads to
increase in utility from TU to TU1 so MU1 is added. To compensate, there should be greater
fall in y (more than one unit) since fall in one unit of y decreases utility by MU 3(which is less
than MU1). So, y must fall by two units (since MU3 + MU2 = MU1). Further, if x is added then
TU3 is achieved and change is MU2 but now y must fall by less than a unit since again fall in
utility due to y (MU1) would be greater than rise in utility from x (MU2). A change in y
should be brought such that loss in utility equals MU2.
The second assumption for well behaved preferences is that averages are preferred to
extremes. Let (x1, y1) & (x2, y2) be on the same indifference curve in fig. 10. Then average
of these two extreme boundless lie above the curve. And, this average would be in a weakly
preferred set iff indifference curve is convex. Consider other (non convex) cases in panel b
& c of fig 10.
Figure 10
Highest level of utility is achieved is at ( 6,2) which is known as bliss point ( fig.12)
Indifference curve is downward sloping in quadrant ‘I’ showing that one good has to be
sacrificed to add extra unit of good to keep utility constant
In ‘II’, Good x (chapatti) becomes ‘bad’ i.e. add to disutility (you can think beyond this he
can have digestive order). But good on y – axis, tablets is yet a ‘good’. Indifference curve
is reproduced again in fig14. The disutility from addition of x is to be compensated by utility
from good y. Indifference curve I2, denotes higher utility than I1 and I0. At I2, y1 level of y
is combined with smaller level of bad x compared to Io, hence I2 shows greater utility.
For Scooby and Shaggy facing moster is a bad…. So to keep them at same utility velma needs
to offer Scooby Snax(good).
In ‘III’, good on y – axis becomes ‘bad’ & good x is yet ‘good’. The indifference curves are
reproduced in fig.15.
Figure15 y is ’bad’
In ‘IV’, both goods become ‘bad’. Indifference curves are negatively sloped but direction of
maximal increase is towards origin & indifference curves are concave to the origin as shown
in fig 16. The indifference curves are circles with satiation point at the centre.
The slope of indifference curve9 is known as marginal rate of substitution. The slope
indicates change in y when x changes by 1 unit. For indifference curve, it would mean that y
is substituted for x in a way that utility is held constant. And, as we saw in earlier sections;
at smaller levels of y, smaller sacrifice would be made as loss in utility from sacrificing 1
unit is high and at greater levels of y, larger sacrifice could be made. Hence, marginal rate
of substitution is diminishing10 along the indifference curve (assuming convexity and
monotonocity). Figure17 shows Δy is declining11 for 1 unit addition in good x.
9
Slope of indifference is different at at different points of indifference curve.Only for a straight line slope is
constant.
10
It is the abosulate number which is reffered here.
11
Also see appendix to this chapter for calculus treatment of it.
4.6.2Perfect substitutes
Two goods are substitutes if the consumer is willing to substitute one good for another at a
constant rate. Constant marginal rate of substitution means that indifference curves are
straight lines.
One ‘Ten rupee bank note’ is perfect substitute of two ‘five rupee bank note’. If ten rupee
note is denoted by y & five rupee note by x: then utility U = x + 2y.
Figure19
The trick to remember that what should be coefficient of x & y is utility function is: since, 1
unit of y gives twice the utility compared to 1 unit of x. Likewise , if ‘a’ units of y gives same
utility as ‘b’ units of x then utility function becomes: U = ax+by and MRS =-a /b
Indifference curves for perfect complements are hence L–shaped with kink at 45˚ line
(because of 1:1 ratio). Slope at vertical portions is infinity as Δx (denominator) is zero &
slope at horizontal portion is zero as Δy (numerator) is zero. If two teaspoons of sugar is
added to one cup of tea then indifference curves are as in panel A of fig 21. For a general
case, where ‘a’ units of x are consumed with & ‘b’ units of y indifference curves are as
shown in panel B of fig.21.
Figure 21: (a) 2 tps of sugar is taken with 1 cup of tea; (b) ‘a’ units of x is taken with ‘b’ units
Institute of Lifelong Learning, Delhi University
of y
Preferences And Indifference Curves
& U = Min { bx, ay}; if ‘a’ units of x are consumed with ‘b’ units of y.
MRS=-MUx/MUy =-axa-1yb/bxayb-1=-ay/bx
U(x,y) = v(x) + y. Here utility is equal to the height of indifference curve along the y-axis
i.e. when x is zero, utility is equal to consumption of y.
The indifference curves are just vertically shifted versions of one indifference curve.
The dashed lines connect indifferent bundles (though consumption at other than dots are
not possible). Strong lines show weakly preferred to (x 1,y1)
Summary:
(1)Three axioms of preferences viz. completeness, reflexivity and transitivity are made
about the consistency of consumers’ preferences.
(a) Negatively sloped, (b) convex to the origin, (c) curves are thin, (d) indifference curves
do not intersect and (e) higher the indifference curves higher the utility.
(4) Beyond a point /level of consumption of any good, disutility is generated i.e. too much
of a good or negative utility. At this level, utility is maximum and such a point is known as
satiation point.
(5)Well behaved preferences exhibit declining marginal rate of substitution i.e. sacrifice of y
each time when x is increased; keeps on declining.
(6) Indifference curves that are convex (but do not general smooth curve with declining
MRS) are for perfect substitutes, perfect compliments, and quasi-linear preferences and
even for discrete goods.
(6)Goods can be good, bad or neutral. If a good is good then it adds to utility when its
consumption is increased else add to disutility (negative utility) if bad and zero utility if
neutral.
Exercises
Q1. Sumit has Cobb –Douglas preferences and his utility function is given by U(x,y) =xy.
State true or false about the following statements considering sumit’s preferences:
a) (10,5)~ (5,10)
b) (20,5) ≥ (4,25)
c) (15,4) ≥ (7.5,7.5)
Q2. The marginal rate of substitution for sumit with utility function is U(x,y)=xy; is given
by:
a) x/y
b) y/x
c) x2/y2
d) y2/x2
i) x+y a) 1.5
ii) x+√y b) 1
iii) x0.5y0.5 c) 6
Q4. If the utility function is U(x,y) = x2-y2. Then what can you conclude about nature of
these goods:
Q7.If both good x and y are bads, draw and explain consumer’s indifference curves.
i) (10,20)~(20,10)
ii) (20,10)>(15,15)
a) U(x,y)= xy
b) U(x,y)= x2+y
Glossary
Indifference curve: A curve showing the locus of combinations of the amounts of
two goods such the consumer is indifferent between any combinations on that curve.
Marginal rate of substitution: It refers to the amount of one good that is required
to compensate the consumer for giving up an amount of another good such that the
consumer has same level of utility as before.
Perfect compliments: Perfect complements are goods that are consumed together
in fixed proportions.
Bad good: A good is said to be bad if addition in its quantity creates disutility even
at lower levels of consumption.
Neutral good: A good is said to be neutral if any quantity of a good can be added &
no change in utility is brought about.
Well behaved preferences: preferences are well behaved when indifference curves
are negatively sloped and convex to the origin.
Appendix
At various heights say α, a disc is seen (with point A' on it). Assume, this disc drops down
on x y plane; which then appears like in fig.A3. C' is the Bliss point where utility is
maximum. C' corresponds to point C in xy plane, which is satiation point.
U = f (x,y)
ΔU= Δx+ Δy
ΔU=MUx Δx +MUy Δy
Or, Δy/Δx=-MUx/MUy
As x increases MUx falls and as y declines MUy increases. Both of which imply that this
fraction falls as x increases. Hence we witness diminishing marginal rate of substitution
along the indifference curve.
References:
Hal R. Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, W.W. Norton and Company/Affiliated
East-West Press (India), 8th edition, 2010.
www.wikipedia.org