23509012
23509012
23509012
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Hebrew Union College Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Hebrew Union College Annual
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Miracle of the Cruse of Oil
A popular view among historians considers the famous Hanukkah story of the
cruse of oil, which appears in the Talmud and seemingly also in the Scholium of
MegillatMegillat Tacanit, as evidence of the determination of the Sages to erase the memory
of the Hasmoneans.
A careful examination of the traditions about Hanukkah in the Scholium of
Megillat Megillat Tacanit demonstrates, however, that the story, as it appears in the Baby
Ionian Talmud, is a secondary form. The two extant versions of the Scholia offer
different traditions in explaining the celebration of Hanukkah. Scholium O makes
no mention of finding any oil and offers other reasons for the establishment of
the festival. Scholium P does present, among other traditions, an early version
of the story, which does not mention any miracle with regard to the finding of
the oil. This same episode appears later in the Babylonian Talmud after it had
evolved and crystallized, and when all other traditions had been rejected. The
Babylonian Talmud is, in fact, the only source for the legend of the bit of oil that
lasted eight days. The supernatural basis of this story, as well as its introduction
as the only explanation for the celebration of Hanukkah, is a Babylonian manip
ulation, motivated by literary rather than historical purposes.
B.Sabb.B.Sabb. 21a. The version presented below is based on the edition of the Talmud print
Venice in 1520. A selection of alternative versions is presented from the following m
scripts: Toronto, Friedberg 002-9 (Jerusalem, Jewish National and University Library, Inst
of Microfilmed Flebrew Manuscripts [hereafter: IMHM], F 70583), hereafter: T; Oxford
(IMHM,F18347), hereafter: O; London Or. 5558 n\50 (IMHM, F6519-20), hereafter: L; Va
127 (IMHM, F8606), hereafter: V; Munich 95, hereafter: M.
MegillatMegillat Tacanit is a short Aramaic document from Second Temple times which lists
thirty-five days during the year on which fasting, and in some cases even delivering
gies for the dead, is prohibited because of festive events and victories which occurre
these dates. On Megillat Tacanit and its commentary, the Scholium, see Vered Noam, Megi
Tacanit:Tacanit: Versions, Interpretation, History (Heb.) (Jerusalem: Yad Itzhak Ben Zvi, 2003). Se
Noam,"The Scholion to Megillat Tacanit: Towards an Understanding of its Stemma" (H
Tarbiz 62 (1993) 59-99, and the bibliography in the footnotes, 55-58; Noam, "Two Tes
19!
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
192 VERED NOAM 2
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
3 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 193
15 1 Macc 4:36-60.
16 2 Macc 1:9,18; 10:6. The author includes the eighth d
akhic ruling of the Sages which stressed that it was "a
and parallel sources).
17 2 Macc 10:1-6.
18 Ant. 12:325.
19 1 Macc chap. 3,4; Ant. 12:287-315. Note especially Judas' words (1 Macc 4:36, and the parallel
in Ant. 12:316): "Now our enemies have been defeated. Let us go purify the sanctuary and
restore it."
20 This aspect is emphasized in the ritual texts of Hanukkah, such as Al Hanisim and Hanerot
Halalu;Halalu; see n.46 below.
21 One of the main twentieth-century proponents of the theory involving the differences and
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
194 VERED NOAM 4
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
5 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 195
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
VERED NOAM
10 +קילדהל אלא
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
7 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 197
30חבזמה תכנח יכ ינש חבזמה תכונח יכ ינש חבזמה תכונח יכ ינש 30
43ןוי ימיב אלא םילכה לכ ואמט ןוי תוכלמ ימיב אלא 43
+ 44יאנ+ומשח ינב וסנכנ קילדהל המב !חש היה אלו יאנומשח ינב וסנכנש 44
45ןידופש העבשו תיבה רהל תוכלמ ורבגשכו םידופש העבש לכיהל 45
46ויה לזרב לש ךפ ואצמ °יאנומש°ח תיב לזרב לש 46
47ץעבב םורבחו םהידיב לודג !הכ לש ומתוחב דחא ץעב םופחו םדיב 47
continues
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
198 VEREDVERED NOAM 8
48 םהב ןיקסעתמ ויהו הנממ וקילדהו םנ השענו תורנה תא םהב וקילדהו 48
50 םהב רומגל ואר המו והונקתו רותס חבזמ ואצמו 50ןהב רומגל ואר המו
53 העושת לכש ךדמלל ]]ח[[בזמה תכנ°ח התיהו העושת לכש אלא 53
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 199
80 80 ךלוהו ףיסומ
88 88 ןידירומ ןיאו
89 89 התקלדה תוצמ
3 and [on which] eulogiz- [on which] eulogizing [on which] eulogizing
ing the dead is forbidden the dead is forbidden the dead is forbidden
continues
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
200 VERED NOAM 10
3,4 And when the Hasmonean And when the Hasmoneans 3,4
dynasty dynasty prevailed, overpowered
sufficient sufficient
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
IX THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 201
28 performed by Solomon Fr
only was
30,31 As is stated: "for [they As is stated: "for [they As is stated: "for they 30,
observed] the dedication observed] the dedication observed the dedication
of the altar seven days of the altar seven days" of the altar seven days
32 and the feast seven days." and the feast seven days." 32
34 for eight [days]? And eight [days] when for eight days? 34
the House of Lebanon
was taken(?)
continues
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
202 VERED NOAM 12
43 Because in the days of they defiled all the vessels Because in the
Greece Greek kingdom
44 the Hasmoneans entered and there was no oil in when the Hasmoneans 44
what what to kindle. entered
45,46 the Temple Mount and And when the Hasmonean the Temple, seven iro
seven iron spits dynasty prevailed they spits
found found one cruse
47 did they have in their with the seal of the High did they have in their 47
hands, and they (joined) Priest hand and they overlaid
[overlaid] them with tin them with tin
48 and they were occupied And a miracle was and kindled the
with it wrought and they kindled therein.
[the[the lights] from it
53 To teach that for each And there was the dedi- Because for each
and every cation of the altar. every
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
13 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 203
continues
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
204 VERED NOAM 14
in Sidon,
should correspond
bullocks of the Festival
89 It is incumbent to kindle it 89
99 o from sunset 90
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
15 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 205
92 And it is incumbent to 92
place it by the doo
99 it is sufficient to place it 99
on the table.
Each of the two original versions of the Scholium (P, O) incorporates several
traditions regarding Hanukkah, while the hybrid version contains all of them.
The following are the topics appearing in each of the versions:
The The miracle of the cruse of A comparison with the The miracle of the cru
oil oil (1-15) dedications of Moses and oil (1-15)
Solomon (18-34)
A comparison with the The miracle of the cruse of A comparison with the
dedications of Moses and oil (36-49) dedications of Moses and
Solomon (18-34) Solomon (16-34)
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
206 VERED NOAM 16
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
17 the miracle of the cruse of oil 207
31 M.Meg. 3:6
32 For the reference see Louis Ginzberg, The Legend
Publication Society, 1946) 6:79 n.420.
33 Pesikta Rabbati 6 (ed. Meir Friedmann [Vienna: se
PekudeiPekudei 11; Midrash Tanhuma (ed. Solomon Buber
bar bar Rabbah, Naso 13.1 (51a).
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
208 VERED NOAM 18
chieftains occurred on
the Sabbath;35 howeve
under discussion.
As to Scholium O, the
corrupt, thus making
sion. Perhaps Scholium
that had been celebrate
been discontinued, wit
former days the dedi
tion of Moses [was cel
18-29). These Hanukka
moneans [was to be cel
to Scholium P, Scholiu
ication and the dedica
pose pose a question ab
ing this explanation, S
ber "eight" (in contras
tion. It would appear t
the mention of the nu
dedication of the Hou
lium O, "And eight [d
may be a vestige of an
relating to Solomons
eighth eighth day they he
seven days, and the f
the Lord, and the king
sent the people away..
lium O to find suppor
tion. Possibly, it was c
the dedication of the
may have taken place o
of Lebanon" (i.e., the k
that the "House of Le
itself, as is commonly
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
19 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 209
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
210 VERED NOAM 20
In summary, Scho
In spite of this, th
in 2 Maccabees, w
dedications of th
which appears to
in an eight-day de
than is Scholium
days of the Hasm
her tradition kno
sive work on whi
allel version in the
in Beresit Rabbah.
40 Pesikta Rabbati 2 (ed. Friedmann, 7a) lists "seven dedications." But the
is not listed there at all, nor are the eight days of the Hasmonean Han
Hanukkah mentioned in that context.
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
21 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 211
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
212 VERED NOAM 22
occupied with it
P, is rather surp
candelabrum out
does not appear
the reconstructe
of the introduc
the historical co
days of Greece
that this passage
in the Scholium
is celebrated spec
incorporated a sh
an answer to the
they determine t
to the end of the
it for eight days.
תרש ילכו הנמש לכAll eight [days] and the service vessels
חבזמה תכנח התיהוAnd there was the dedication [ ]תכנחof the altar.
This tradition is found only in Scholium O (lines 50-54), and it has no parallel
version, either in Scholium P or anywhere else throughout rabbinic literature!
It should be emphasized that in the few places where we did find explicit ref
erence by the Sages to the reason for establishing the festival of Hanukkah46
there is no mention of the dedication of the altar as an explanation for Hanuk
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
23 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 213
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
214 VERED NOAM 24
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
25 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 215
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
216 VERED NOAM 26
HALLEL
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
27 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 217
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
218 VERED NOAM 28
האדוהו ללהב
For when the Greeks entered the Because the heathens defiled
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
29 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 219
they made search and found only they searched it and foun
one cruse of oil oil
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
220 VERED NOAM 30
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
31 THE MIRACLE OF THE CRUSE OF OIL 221
For when the Greeks entered the Temple, they defiled all the vessels, and
there was no oil in what to kindle, and when the Hasmonean dynasty
prevailed, they found one cruse with the seal of the High Priest, and a
miracle was wrought and they kindled [the lights] from it up to eight days.
This is the complete account of the "miracle of the cruse of oil." The wording of
the incident, however, was corrupted: It is not "oils" ( )םינמשthat were defiled,
as in the talmudic story of the cruse of oil, but instead, "all the vessels." Gen
erally, the meaning of the word "vessels" ( )םילכin the context of the Temple
service refers to the Temple service vessels and not containers for storage of
oil. The next sentence is syntactically incorrect. It states, "There was no oil
in what to kindle" ( )קילדהל המב ןמש היה אלinstead of "There was no oil with
which to kindle" ()וב קילדהל ןמש היה אל. The citation about Hanukkah taken
from Scholium O67 by the author of Or Zaruca in the name of his rabbi, which
was referred to earlier, differs from the extant Scholium O (below), particularly
with regard to those sentences which appear to relate to the miracle of the
cruse of oil:
67 The quoted text that appears before and after the unit under discussion clearly indicates that
the citation is from Scholium O. Compare the complete passage in Or ZaruFa, as presented
above, with the version appearing in Scholium O in the chart at the beginning of this article.
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
222 VERED NOAM 32
Scholium Scholium O —
לודג ןהכ לש ומתוחב דחא ךפ ואצמ ץעננ םופחו לזרב ידופש העבש ואינה
For when the Greeks entered the Because the Greeks entered the
Temple, they defiled all the vessels Temple and defiled all the vessels
and there was no oil in what to and they had nothing in which to
kindle kindle kindle the oil.
they found they found one cruse with the seal of they brought seven iron s
And And a miracle was wrought and they and began to kindle,
kindled [thekindled [the lights] from it for up to
The version of Megillat Tacanit (i.e., Scholium O of Megillat Tacanit) that was
quoted by R. Isaac of Vienna in Or Zaruca and his rabbi, R. Judah Sir Leon,
contained the incident of the iron spits, and not the story of the cruse ofoil\ Or
ZarucaZaruca cites the miracle of the cruse of oil from the Talmud. R. Judah Sir Leon's
previously-mentioned attempt to reconcile the contradicting traditions of the
dedication of the altar in Megillat Tacanit and the miracle of the cruse of oil
in the Talmud, indicates that the story of the cruse of oil did not appear at
all in his Megillah, but only in the Talmud. His Scholium O contained only the
incident of the spits. Today s extant Oxford manuscript is clearly not an orig
inal version. It does not refer to "oils" ( )םינמשthat were defiled, as in the story
of the miracle of the cruse of oil, but "all the vessels" ()םילכה לכ, including the
candelabrum. The syntactically incorrect sentence "there was no oil in what
to kindle" ( )קילדהל המב ןמש היה אלis an intentional distortion of the origi
nal sentence: "and they had nothing in which to kindle the oil" (םהל היה אל
)ןמש קילדהל המב. It was not oil that was missing, but rather a candelabrum. The
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
33 the miracle of the cruse of oil 223
The hybrid version of the Scholium closely follows the structure of Scholium
P with regard to Hanukkah. Incorporated in between the units of Scholium P
is an episode from Scholium O (the repairing of the altar). This, typically, is
one of the methods used by the redactor for combining the two versions.68 In
the case of the miracle of the cruse of oil, the hybrid version replaces the ver
sion found in Scholium P with the Babylonian version. This too does not
in any way constitute a departure from normal practice. The redactor of this
compilation repeatedly incorporated units from the Babylonian Talmud and
even replaced original passages of the Scholium with parallel passages from
the Talmud.69 The end of the Scholium also contains several units which were
taken from the Babylonian Talmud.70 However, in the case of the cruse of oil,
the dependence of the author of the hybrid version on the Babylonian Talmud
led to an erroneous belief that was widely held and firmly entrenched among
scholars, i.e., that the miracle of the cruse of oil is presented in both the Bab
ylonian Talmud and Megillat Tacanit. In fact, it appears only in the Talmud,
from which it was later copied into the hybrid version of the Scholium.
An indirect outcome of comparing the traditions regarding Hanukkah in
the Babylonian Talmud and in the Scholia is that we obtain an indication of the
value and origins of Scholium O and Scholium P. These two extant scholia,
although fragmented and corrupt, preserve authentic and important tradi
tions. The tradition in Scholium O involving the building of the altar and the
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
224 VERED NOAM 34
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
35 the miracle of the cruse of oil 225
Conclusion
The story of the miracle of the cruse of oil illustrates several of the impe
that rabbinic literature places in the way of the attempt to reveal the "a
of the Sages" to a particular subject: the multitude of variations appea
this literature; the dynamic and fluid way in which it is transmitted; th
neering influence of the Babylonian Talmud over parallel or earlier tr
— all of which may contribute to the creation of a distorted picture.
The extant versions of the Scholia offer three different traditions that
why we celebrate Hanukkah:
Of the three explanations, the tradition of the iron spits is the only one
common to both Scholium O and Scholium P. Both scholia also make a com
72 Even though they also emphasize the showbread and the incense, the festival is connected spe
cifically to the dedication of the altar. It should also be noted that all of the activities involved
in the purification of the Temple, as recounted in 1 and 2 Maccabees, were not known to the
authors of the two Scholia. Even though 2 Maccabees alludes to the dedications of Moses and
Solomon as the reason for the eight days of Hanukkah, Scholium O is not familiar with the
explanation given in 2 Maccabees that the eight days are a substitute for Sukkot. This is further
evidence for the impression I get that the versions of the scholia have no direct connection
with 1 and 2 Maccabees.
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
226 VERED NOAM 36
This content downloaded from 129.98.42.36 on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:00:30 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms