Man's Perfectibility
Man's Perfectibility
Man's Perfectibility
“Man… day by day builds himself up through his many free decisions; and so he knows,
loves and accomplishes moral good by stages of growth.”1 Man is not born knowing all things.
His whole life is a moment of learning and exploration of new things and of truth. Confucianism
concerns were mainly about political contexts and moral doctrines. Confucius (Kongzi c. 551- c.
479 BCE), the recognized founder of Confucianism, gave attention and observed the life of man.
He focused on man that humanism became the central theme in Confucianism. Unlike others in
his time, who were interested in cosmocentric philosophies and theocentric philosophies, and the
reality of death, Confucius was attracted in studying everyday concerns. He is known with his
principle, “We do not yet know how to serve man, how can we know serving the spirits?” “We
don’t know yet about life, how can we know about death?”2
Most of Confucius works were mainly about issues related to man, family, morals, and
the purpose of a good ruler. Confucius was able to relate the purpose of man to a good society.
The importance of man a member of a family which is a part of a bigger society. He believed
that man is first formed by his family and it is only after then he can contribute to a larger state,
the society. Confucius made use of Ren (humanity or humaneness as translated in English) as the
head or the highest Confucian principles — Yi (honesty and uprightness), Zhi (knowledge and
wisdom), Xin (faithfulness and integrity), and Li (propriety). Ren, which is humanity, is the
complete Virtue of the mind.3 Confucius was against the idea that some men are born superior to
others. He believed in the perfectibility of man. He rejects the notion that man’s superiority was
determined by his nobility or by the status where he belongs. He believed that all men are
perfectible by personal and communal endeavor which on the latter part became his concept of
self-cultivation. Blood has nothing to do with man’s superiority rather being moral makes him
superior not to other beings but to himself. Confucius was interested on what we can become for
human being is not something we are; it is something we do and become.4
1
John Paul II, Familiaris Consortio, (November 1981) accessed on March 12, 2019. Vatican.va.
no.34.
2
Cofucius, Roger T. Ames, and Henry Rosemont. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical
Translation. (New York: Ballantine Pub. Group, 1998), p. 144.
3
Wing-tsit Chan, trans. Neo-Confucian Terms Explained (New York: Columbia University Press,
1986), p. 75.
4
Analects, 12.1.
Man is perfectible to through ren, which encompasses zhi (knowledge and wisdom) and
the other Confucian principles, when cultivation of this virtue is manifested. It is when one is
able to know what is right and what is wrong yet the principle of knowledge is in it 5 and also the
presence of the other virtues. One cannot become a person by oneself and so we are irreducibly
social. Ren is the foremost process of growing (sheng). Confucius viewed man as perfectible
being in a sense that he is teachable and improvable and not in a sense that he is faultless or
blameless. This perfectibility is a continuous lifelong self-cultivation:
“The master said, “from fifteen, my heart-and-mind was set upon learning; from thirty I took
my stance; from forty I was no longer doubtful; from fifty I realized the propensities what the
world is and how it is (tian); from sixty my ear was attuned; from seventy I could give my
heart-and-mind free in without overstepping the bounderies.”” 6
Self-cultivation is not selfishness. Man is perfectible through the society and his
perfectibility is for the society, his community. What makes this concept interesting is that it
expresses the virtue of hope. Perfectibility of man is basically a hope to what he can really
become. Confucius advocates that man are endowed with authentic potentiality to develop
himself as a moral person but through the cognitive and affective functions of the mind. Man’s
perfectibility is a self-cultivation to serve as a motivation for everyone to be able to form a
society in harmony. Self-cultivation is not an egocentric act for it starts with oneself and ends for
the society. Man is a being capable of learning and his refinement of knowledge lies in the study
of things. And there could only be pure intentions when one has a refined knowledge. Having
pure intentions are only hearts and mind rectified. And when the hearts and minds rectified one
may now cultivate his personal life; and when he is cultivated, the family where he belongs
becomes in order. Families that are in order causes states be governed and with this a
harmonious society is made possible. Self-cultivation, on the other hand, is a responsibility of
everyone since no one lives on his own. It is a mutual responsibility informed by a transcendent
vision. With the manifestation of ren in the process of self-cultivation, our society may achieve
impeccable harmony.
5
Ibid, p. 70.
6
Analects, 2.4.