Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    In The Court Room

    Uploaded by

    jai purohit

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    In The Court Room

    Uploaded by

    jai purohit
    15 views1 page

    Original Title

    In the court room

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views1 page

    In The Court Room

    Uploaded by

    jai purohit

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    In the court room, explain the standard type of jury that would be legally acceptable.

    How can jury selection


    include errors?

    The standard and most ideal type of jury would be one that is open minded, free of bias and favoritism. This is
    because there are a wide range of cases and the personal preferences someone has can rig a case. Justice
    needs to be based on logical reasoning they use in day to day life without the biases. One choice of the jury
    has a huge impact on the person that is guilty or not. Jury selection can be erroneous in some ways when the
    voir dire process is aided by specialists that help attorneys. They may help the attorney that can rig the
    decision in the attorneys favor. In the courtroom, the process of voir dire is intended to detect bias or narrow-
    mindedness among potential jurors. Even when the jury chosen ends up having bias or even using there
    emotions rather than the facts presented.

    In the courtroom: What is the goal of the prosecutor? The defense attorney? Provide examples in order to
    clarify your discussion.

    The prosecutor’s goal is to charge the suspect with crimes and try to convict them in court, while the defense
    attorney is just there to defend the client, the suspect, and prevent conviction. The prosecutor must prove the
    crime beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defense attorney is not trying to prove anything just there to
    represent the client. An example of a prosecutor would be a lawyer charging a man with rape on a women and
    then killing her and he provides lots of DNA proof and witnesses from the night of the event. While the defense
    attorney, who the client has told that he did commit the crime, but the attorney continues to talk on behalf of this
    client, not trying to prove innocence but trying to show flaws in the opposing’s argument.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy