Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 330 views

    CESPES Form No. 003-A - PCRF 2 Blank

    Uploaded by

    Simon Zgd
    This document is a rating form used to evaluate the performance of career executive service personnel in the Philippines. It contains sections to assess: [1] how an individual's outputs align with the agency's organizational outcomes; [2] the individual's performance against commitments and accountability measures; and [3] any innovative accomplishments beyond mandated functions. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with ratings in sections 1 and 2 weighted to calculate an overall performance contract rating. The form requires signatures from the ratee and superior to certify the accuracy of accomplishments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CESPES Form No. 003-A - PCRF 2 Blank

    Uploaded by

    Simon Zgd
    330 views2 pages
    This document is a rating form used to evaluate the performance of career executive service personnel in the Philippines. It contains sections to assess: [1] how an individual's outputs align with the agency's organizational outcomes; [2] the individual's performance against commitments and accountability measures; and [3] any innovative accomplishments beyond mandated functions. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with ratings in sections 1 and 2 weighted to calculate an overall performance contract rating. The form requires signatures from the ratee and superior to certify the accuracy of accomplishments.

    Original Description:

    CESPES Form No. 003-A_PCRF 2 blank

    Original Title

    CESPES Form No. 003-A_PCRF 2 blank

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a rating form used to evaluate the performance of career executive service personnel in the Philippines. It contains sections to assess: [1] how an individual's outputs align with the agency's organizational outcomes; [2] the individual's performance against commitments and accountability measures; and [3] any innovative accomplishments beyond mandated functions. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with ratings in sections 1 and 2 weighted to calculate an overall performance contract rating. The form requires signatures from the ratee and superior to certify the accuracy of accomplishments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    330 views2 pages

    CESPES Form No. 003-A - PCRF 2 Blank

    Uploaded by

    Simon Zgd
    This document is a rating form used to evaluate the performance of career executive service personnel in the Philippines. It contains sections to assess: [1] how an individual's outputs align with the agency's organizational outcomes; [2] the individual's performance against commitments and accountability measures; and [3] any innovative accomplishments beyond mandated functions. Performance is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with ratings in sections 1 and 2 weighted to calculate an overall performance contract rating. The form requires signatures from the ratee and superior to certify the accuracy of accomplishments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    CAREER EXECUTIVE SERVICE BOARD


    No. 3 Marcelino St., Holy Spirit Drive, Diliman, Quezon City
    Tel. Nos. 951-4981 local 110, 111 & 126; 951-4986 (telefax)

    CAREER EXECUTIVE SERVICE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM


    RATING FORM FOR SUPERIOR
    CESPES Form No. 003-A
    Performance Rating Period __________________

    NAME OF RATEE:

    POSITION TITLE/DESCRIPTION: (As Indicated in DBM-CSC Form No. 1)


    Regional Director
    Agency/Department: Work Station:

    1. ALIGNMENT OF RATEE’S OUTPUT WITH AGENCY/ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOME


    1.1. Organizational Outcome: (Dropdown as indicated in the National Expenditure Program)

    a. Operations

    Program/Subprogram/ Outcome/Output Indicators Target Actual Accomplishment


    Service (As reported in BAR No.1)
    (Pre-Encoded as (Pre-Encoded as indicated in
    indicated in the NEP) the NEP)

    b. Support to Operations (Based on OPCR)

    Service/Projects/ Performance Indicator Target Actual Accomplishment


    Activities

    c. General Administration and Support (Based on OPCR

    Service/Projects/ Performance Indicator Target Actual Accomplishment


    Activities

    II. INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY

    Program Output and Process Process Output Performance Target Accomplishment Performance
    Requirements Indicator Rating
    (Quality/Quantity/
    Timelines

    Page 1 of 2
    Total

    III. Innovating and Intervening Accomplishments


    (Identify all outputs/outcomes achieved beyond your mandated functions and responsibilities)

    Innovating and Intervening Output Quality Quantity Timeliness Average

    Total

    IV. Performance Evaluation on Accomplishments (90%)

    Rating for Individual Performance Commitment (IPC) __________ x .80 =__________


    Rating of Innovating and Intervening Accomplishments (IIA) __________ x .20 =__________
    Performance Contract Rating (IPC+IIA) __________

    V. Certification

    I hereby certify that all the stated outcomes and accomplishments are true and correct.

    Signature over Printed Name of Ratee-Official


    Date

    Attested by:

    Signature over Printed Name of Superior Rater


    Date

    Rating Scale

    5 – Outstanding – Performance represents an extraordinary level of achievement and commitment in terms of quality and time,
    skills and knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and initiative.
    4 – Very Satisfactory- Performance exceeded expectations. All goals, objectives, and targets were achieved above the established
    standards.
    3 – Satisfactory – Performance and expectations in terms of quality of work, efficiency and timeliness. The most critical goals are
    met.
    2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance failed to meet expectations, and/or one or more of the critical goals were not met
    1 – Poor – Performance was consistently below expectations, and/or reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made.
    Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.

    Page 2 of 2

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy