Group3 - Sec C - Zensar
Group3 - Sec C - Zensar
Group3 - Sec C - Zensar
Submitted by
Section C - Group 03
Hariharan A 2013PGP151
Zensar describes its culture as large enough deliver but Small enough to care.
Their CEO Ganesh Natarajan has fostered “family culture” at Zensar and the company prides
itself on process and people innovation.
Employees consider Ganesh as a leader with a high emotional quotient who knows each
individual. He had the ability to connect with people at all levels.
Despite the emotional connection with employees he was performance oriented.
He was at ease with both micromanaging and complete empowerment.
Ganesh used to collect feedback on his ideas and sometimes he used to create conflict and
openly acknowledge opposing views so that they don’t keep their views to themselves.
They wanted to be among top 15 IT and BPO services firms based in India.
Become a $500 million organization.
Become the preferred second tier vendor for the clients.
1
Engagement with employees
Objective: To share business updates, industry scenario and allay any fears amongst employees
Description: This meeting, considered the largest amongst all, was conducted on a quarterly basis to
share key information to all employees.
Benefit: Employees being updated on the key internal affairs of the company and external scenario
is important to ensure that they feel associated and linked to the happenings and growth of the
company.
Objective: To hear from the employees themselves the issues that they face and the improvements
they would want to see
Description: These meetings were conducted by the senior management team in an informal
environment with 12 to 14 randomly selected employees. These meetings were held 2 to 3 times a
month. Questions and responses obtained in the meeting were recorded and uploaded on the
intranet.
Benefit: The direct interaction of the employees with senior managers would remove the fear of
any repercussions, allowing them to freely interact and voice their opinion. By, uploading the
questions and responses and allowing a forum for discussion amongst other employees, the senior
management would be able to get a greater insight into the issues and suggestions to resolve them.
Objective: To enable an associate meet his or her manager’s manager without an intermediary
Benefit: The direct interaction with the seniors in the same division or line without the interaction of
the manager will allow employees to discuss their careers
Durbar-e-Khas
Objective: To give individuals an opportunity to consult with senior management member regarding
personal issues, grievances and seek guidance.
Description: This was one on one interaction in which each employee was assigned half an hour slot
well in advance to consult with senior management member. Twelve hours per month were set
aside for these meetings.
Benefit: It helps to build trust in employees mind about top management. If there are some serious
issues which are not been taken care of can be consulted.
2
Problem statement
Along with achieving its growth target, the company wanted to know how the Visual Community
(VC) would serve the purpose of a larger Zensar and how it would connect employees spread across
the Globe. The management also wanted to decide the new structure for VC.
Vision Communities
Vision Community was an inclusive forum for innovation and strategy formulation, based on a
unifying theme. It was incorporated in Zensar in 2001 by Ganesh Natarajan, its tagline being: “If you
have an idea, we have a platform.”
Timeline
3
4. Phase 4: Strategy Implementation
Presently, the VC’s have evolved into a focused and disciplined team, which would
implement the strategic ideas they develop.
The Vision Community process started with the launch meet and continued till the idea generated
would be implemented. The process can be outlined as follows:
1. Launch
The launch of the process begins with an official communication about the theme for the
year and inviting all employees to attend the launch meeting in Pune.
The meeting started with the CEO addressing the gathering about the theme of the year
and the industry backdrop.
Ideas generated by all were categorized
Based on nominations provided by every member, 7 or 8 teams of 25-30 are formed.
Mentors, usually senior managers were assigned to each team
2. Idea Generation
The second phase of the process, the Idea generation phase involved generating and
developing ideas.
Teams selected their own leaders and held several rounds of meetings to generate and
develop ideas
The reasons for dropping an idea by the team was also supposed to be stated
They had to narrow the list to eight ideas based on few criteria
During this month long process, a number of workshops and seminars were conducted.
3. Idea Short-listing
Each team presented their top 8 ideas to the management council in a 30 minutes
presentation, where the council selected the top 3 ideas.
4. Implementation
A detailed project report, which would include budget, assessment of support required from
the organization was done. To ensure implementation does happen, functional leaders are
appointed to each group right from the beginning.
4
Future of Vision Communities
Need for change
As Zensar continued to grow, the challenge it was facing was to adapt the VC process to serve the
needs of a larger, more dispersed organization. As the company continues to expand geographically
and add new products and services by expanding business verticals, it would face increasing
challenges in implementing the model in the present format. Would the model work if the
organization grows to 10000 employees in three years?
Advantages:
The process has been effective and delivered results since the last 9 years
Managers and employees alike are likely to be comfortable with the present process
Disadvantages:
With a growing global workforce, it was difficult for people far from Pune to attend the
meeting
It could capture and develop only a small number of ideas
Having only 1 meet in a year, the process was calendar bound, allowing employees a single
window to express their ideas and be part of the process.
Option 2: Online VC
Advantages:
Disadvantage
However this would reduce the level of engagement and enthusiasm among employees
Since the very essence of a VC is employees sitting and debating together in a room, by
having an online VC, these factors were getting compromised
5
Recommendations:
Clearly there are advantages and disadvantages amongst both the options mentioned above. We do
not recommend the moving of the VC to an online form, as it surely dilutes the very purpose of the
community. The engagement amongst employees desired would drastically reduce. As mentioned
VC meets allowed employees to interact with multiple senior executives, which an online platform
would not be able to implement. Keeping in mind the importance of family culture promoted in the
company, the present basic form of the VC should be maintained. However, we recommend the
following changes in the structure and processes followed by the present VC:
Biannual VC meets at Pune – A biannual meet would provide not only the employees but
also the company with 2 windows to interact with each other. Employees get an opportunity
to present ideas 2 times a year.
VC meets at Global locations – Zensar can look at having VC meets in locations abroad to
tap ideas amongst their foreign employees. As mentioned, the US alone contributes to 50%
of the revenue, followed by Europe, which contributes 25%. The company can have one VC
meet in US and one in Europe
Create area specific VC - this would generate ideas relevant to specific geographies and will
be easy to handle. The Management Council can convene meetings of the really good ideas
with the rest on the heads on a bi-annual basis.
If the online initiative gets a nod, it can be tweaked a little by creating an online competition like the
"Mahindra - Spark the rise". It will have preconceived categories and participants have to give their
idea specific to the category. These entries are checked and filtered and only the really good ones
are accepted and those people are further called for future VCs. As only selected ideas are discussed,
it will be easier to handle and participation from across the globe can be taken.