CAPS

Guide to the
CIRRUS AIRFRAME PARACHUTE SYSTEM (CAPS™)

1
GUIDE TO CAPS
Dear fellow Cirrus pilot,

When Cirrus planned the original design requirements for the SR20, safety was always at the top of
the list. There is no perfect safety solution, but there is technology that can be implemented to make
aviation safer than it historically has been. What began as an idea of a whole airframe parachute
system, available to save the pilot and passengers in the event of an emergency, became our
requirement for the SR20 and SR22.

Safety, comfort, ease of use and performance drives our design philosophy at Cirrus Aircraft. But
even with intuitive avionics, a digital autopilot with a level button, a crashworthy structure, cuffed
leading edges, cockpit weather information, FIKI and many other safety features designed into the
airplane, it is still the pilot that must manage these systems and make the decisions that truly effect
the safety of flight. The only way to achieve the full safety and utility benefits available only in Cirrus
aircraft is through training, and that includes CAPS training.

At Cirrus we believe in continuous training. Continually improving our pilot skills allows us to achieve
the maximum performance and utility from any airplane. The Cirrus Airframe Parachute System
requires training as well. As Cirrus pilots, we need to think about scenarios in which we would use
the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System. We also need to make sure our passengers are aware of this
life-saving feature.

CAPS is available to you for the worst scenarios. It is there for us to use. And it works.

Dale Klapmeier
CEO & Co-founder

2
Introduction
This Guide is an introduction to the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS). It will discuss the history,
how it works, general deployment information, success stories, barriers contributing to pilot indecision
and tips on how to fly with CAPS. This information provides a foundation of knowledge for a pilot to build
upon during formalized CAPS training with a Cirrus Standardized Instructor Pilot (CSIP) or Cirrus Training
Center (CTC).

Activating CAPS is deceptively simple – reach up above the pilot’s shoulder and pull the red handle to
initiate the CAPS deployment sequence. Anyone in the airplane can do it. Yet there have been several
fatal accidents that could have been survivable had the pilot activated CAPS. It works, but Cirrus pilots
need to train so they are capable and prepared to use it when they need it. Every Cirrus pilot should
obtain CAPS training by completing the CAPS Training Syllabus. The following information is meant to
guide a pilot’s decision making regarding when and how to use CAPS in an emergency.

CAPS History
The Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS)
In 1985 Alan Klapmeier, a co-founder of Cirrus Aircraft, was training for his instrument rating. During a
training flight, Alan was involved in a midair collision. Although the pilot of the other airplane died, Alan and
his instructor were able to land safely. Instead of concluding that airplanes are dangerous and should be
more heavily regulated, he came away from this experience believing that “People are involved. People make
mistakes. There has to be another option.” The parachute system was an opportunity to save lives. From the
start, CAPS was considered standard equipment and became integrated into the original design of the first
Cirrus aircraft, and on every aircraft thereafter that Cirrus has delivered.

History of the whole airplane parachute

The idea of a whole airplane parachute has been around as long as airplanes. Many designs were
attempted but none were practical or useful. In 1982, Ballistic Recovery Systems (BRS) started
producing parachutes for ultra-light aircraft. In 1993, BRS created a parachute system for the Cessna
150/152 aircraft. As an add-on system, it was costly, heavy and took up valuable baggage space. Market
success for the Cessna 150 BRS system was elusive and the airplane manufacturer never promoted it.

Photo courtesy of Aerofiles.com

3
The Cirrus Vision of CAPS
A well-integrated parachute in all airplanes - “Safety is not an option”
Cirrus Aircraft knew that the CAPS had to have certain attributes to make it successful:

• Rapid Deployment - Most deployments are near the ground and every second counts.
• Reliable - Owners need to be able to trust that it will work in a wide range of emergency conditions.
• Simple – The pilot must be able to easily deploy it in an emergency.
• Small and light - It must be no heavier than a large suitcase and must not restrict baggage space.
• Company Support - To get the full safety benefit, CAPS has to be standard equipment and owners
need proper training.

The BRS system for the Cessna 150/152 was a good starting point, but the question remained whether
it could be scaled up for a faster and heavier 4-seat composite airplane like the SR20. The risks and
challenges in developing a parachute system were daunting:

• Parachute loads increase over 400%.

• Parachute size increase over 150%.
• Weight restrictions require new parachute materials and construction.
• A new rocket was required and needed to be powerful enough to handle the larger parachute.
• New production methods were required that would allow the system to be installed underneath the
sleek composite skin.

Designing the Original CAPS system

Computer Simulations
Computer simulated deployments were used to better understand how the
airplane would behave during a CAPS deployment. These simulations led
engineers to keep the rear aircraft attach harness short until after the parachute
was fully deployed. The shortened rear harness limited airplane pitch-up during
parachute opening, making for a smoother deployment.

Drop tests
Canopy strength drop tests were important to establish
the ultimate capability of the CAPS parachute. During the
development of the original CAPS parachute, Cirrus performed
over 45 drop tests from a C123 cargo airplane at speeds
approaching 175 kts.

Rocket Extraction Tests - Extraction tests were performed to establish rapid

and proper extraction of the parachute from the aircraft. The time from CAPS
handle pull to full extension of parachute lines is less than two seconds.

Ground Impact Drop Testing

Airframe drop tests onto a concrete floor were performed. Instrumented crash test
dummies were used to show that the impact forces on the pilot and passenger
were within acceptable limits.

4
 Inflight Tests
Numerous inflight deployments were made over a six-month period
that included deployments from a spin, stalls and speeds up to 133
KIAS. After each CAPS deployment the test pilot would release the
parachute and fly away so the airplane could be used for the next
inflight test.

Safety features that make a CAPS landing successful

Safety features that contribute to making a CAPS landing
survivable include 26G seats, composite landing gear,
and an airframe that is designed to absorb impact loads.
Additionally, there is a composite roll cage for added strength
and occupant protection.

Certification with Equivalent

Level of Safety and CAPS
During the certification of the SR20, Cirrus and the FAA
focused on a way to decrease the number of spin accidents.
Adopting a cuffed wing design developed by NASA reduces
the likelihood of a stall or spin occurring in the first place.
The outboard section of the wing is set at a lower angle
of attack, providing superior slow flight and stall handling
characteristics. Aileron authority is increased in a stall,
because the outboard wing’s airflow is better preserved in a
Cirrus Design Section 3
post stall condition.
SR22T Emergency Procedures

Unusual Attitude Emergencies

The NASA cuffed wing design and CAPS were developed
Inadvertent Spin Entry
1. CAPS ............................................................................. ACTIVATE
independently of each other, but when combined, provided
Amplification a potentially safer airplane than traditional standards for
• WARNING • certification regulated. The NASA cuffed wing design will help
In all cases, if the aircraft enters an unusual attitude from
which recovery is not expected before ground impact,
pilots to avoid stall/spin events, but if controls are misused
immediate deployment of the CAPS is required. and a spin is inadvertently entered, CAPS provides a way
The minimum demonstrated altitude loss for a CAPS
deployment from a one-turn spin is 920 feet. Activation at for the pilot to recover, even if they are not proficient in spin
higher altitudes provides enhanced safety margins for
parachute recoveries. Do not waste time and altitude trying to recovery procedures. Any time a Cirrus pilot experiences a
recover from a spiral/spin before activating CAPS.
loss of control or spin, the use of CAPS is required.
The aircraft is not approved for spins, and has not been tested or
certified for spin recovery characteristics. The only approved and
demonstrated method of spin recovery is activation of the Cirrus
Given that Cirrus had demonstrated enhanced low speed handling characteristics that will help pilots to
Airframe Parachute System (See CAPS Deployment, this section).
Because of this, if the aircraft “departs controlled flight,” the CAPS
avoid inadvertent spin entry and the presence of CAPS, the FAA granted Cirrus an Equivalent Level of
must be deployed.

Safety (ELOS) for the spin recovery requirement of the certification regulations. This ELOS is accepted
While the stall characteristics of the aircraft make accidental entry into
a spin extremely unlikely, it is possible. Spin entry can be avoided by
by all civil
using good aviation
airmanship: authorities
coordinated use of controlsthat have
in turns, proper certified the Cirrus SR20 and SR22.
airspeed control following the recommendations of this Handbook, and
never abusing the flight controls with accelerated inputs when close to
the stall (see Stalls, Section 4).
If, at the stall, the controls are misapplied and abused accelerated
inputs are made to the elevator, rudder and/or ailerons, an abrupt wing
drop may be felt and a spiral or spin may be entered. In some cases it
may be difficult to determine if the aircraft has entered a spiral or the
5
beginning of a spin.
CAPS Changes for the Generation 5 Cirrus Airframe – “The Most Cirrus Ever”
Cirrus Aircraft increased the maximum gross weight of the Generation 5 (G5) airframe by 200 pounds
to a new total of 3,600 pounds. This increase in weight required reengineering the CAPS system. The
G5 parachute has a larger diameter of 65 ft (19.8 m), compared to the 55 ft (16.7 m) diameter of the
original parachute. The increase in size and weight of the parachute meant the CAPS rocket size also
had to be increased. The G5 rocket incorporates an electronic ignition and still uses the same familiar
red activation handle. The line cutter fuses have been delayed to 10 seconds, allowing more time for the
larger parachute to inflate. The demonstrated parameters for the G5 were calculated from G5 parachute
drop tests simulating a 3600 pound airplane. The demonstrated altitude loss for the G5 is 561 feet from
straight and level, and 1081 feet from a spin. The G5 airplane and parachute descend at a slower rate
than the 3400 pound parachute. Generation 5 parachute development included over 70 drop tests.

How CAPS Works

CAPS Deployment Sequence

CAPS Activation - To activate the CAPS system, the pilot

or occupant removes the CAPS activation handle cover and
pulls the red handle located in the ceiling between the pilot
and co-pilot. The handle should be pulled with both hands
in a steady, deliberate, chin up motion. About 45 lbs (20.45
kilograms) of force and two inches of travel are required to
activate the system.

Rocket and Parachute Extraction - When the CAPS

activation handle is pulled, the cable causes the rocket to
ignite and dislodges the Rocket Assembly CAPS cover
located behind the baggage compartment. The rocket
extracts the deployment bag containing the packed
parachute from the airplane. The deployment bag protects
the parachute until it is away from the airplane and ensures
the parachute will deploy in an orderly fashion.

Line Extension, Initial Canopy Inflation and

Reefed Parachute - As the parachute inflates, the forward
harnesses are extracted out of from under the fuselage skin.
As air begins to fill the canopy, the initial loads cause the
aircraft to pitch up, providing some aerodynamic braking.
This pitch up also helps minimize altitude loss. The rear
harness length is kept short during this period to keep the
plane from over rotating. The parachute’s slider ring keeps
the parachute from fully opening until airspeed is reduced
to the point where the parachute can fully inflate without
generating excessive loads.

6
 Parachute Disreef – At the beginning of the deployment
sequence, the slider ring is positioned at the top of the
suspension lines, near the canopy. As inflation loads increase,
the slider moves down the suspension lines, allowing the canopy
to fully inflate. During the inflation process, the airplane will
transition from a nose-high attitude to a nose-low attitude, until
the line cutters extend the aft harness to its full length.

Snub Line Release and Touchdown - When the pyrotechnic

line cutter fuses have expired, the cutters will sever a snub line,
allowing the folded aft harness to extend to its full length and
support the aft load. The airplane will assume its touchdown
attitude to optimize occupant protection. The airplane will
descend under the canopy at less than 1700 fpm and ground
impact is expected to be equivalent to dropping from a height of
13 feet (about 4 meters). The airframe, seats and landing gear
are all designed to absorb the impact energy.

Demonstrated Deployment Parameters

400’ (561’ G5*) - Demonstrated loss of altitude from a straight and level CAPS deployment
920’ (1081’ G5*) - Demonstrated loss of altitude from a 1 turn spin
135 KIAS - VPD (SR20 G1/G2) - Maximum demonstrated deployment speed for CAPS
133 KIAS - VPD (SR20 G3/SR22/SR22T) - Maximum demonstrated deployment speed for CAPS
140 KIAS - VPD (SR22/SR22TG5) - Maximum demonstrated deployment speed for CAPS
*Demonstrated parameters for the G5 were calculated from G5 parachute drop tests simulating a 3,600 lbs airplane

CAPS Works - 69 Lives Saved To Date As of March 2013

CAPS Works - 85 Lives Saved To Date As of 01.10.14

ZERO Fatalities to date when CAPS has been

activated within demonstrated parameters As of 01.10.14

As of January 2014 there have been 85 lives saved when the pilot or passengers in a Cirrus aircraft
have activated CAPS. It has been used in many situations including medical issues, loss of engine
power and loss of control situations due to icing, turbulence, spins, control failure, VFR into IMC and
disorientation in IMC conditions.

When CAPS was activated within these demonstrated parameters,

• Speeds less than VPD
• Altitudes above 400’ in straight and level flight
• Altitudes above 920’ in a spin
there have been zero fatalities.

7
Possible CAPS Deployment Situations
CAPS should be activated in the event of a life-threatening emergency where CAPS deployment is
determined to be safer than continued flight and landing.

• Loss of Control - A loss of control is when the airplane does not respond as the pilot
expects and may result from flight control or system failure, turbulence, disorientation,
icing or pilot loss of situational awareness. If a loss of control occurs, CAPS should
be activated immediately.
• Engine Failure Not Over a Runway – If a forced landing is required onto any surface
other than a runway, CAPS activation is strongly recommended. If a forced landing over
rough or mountainous terrain, over water, in fog, at night, or in low IMC conditions is
required, CAPS activation is strongly recommended.
• Engine Failure Over a Runway - During engine failures within gliding distance of a
runway, the pilot must continually evaluate the situation.
- At 2,000 ft AGL, if the landing is assured the pilot may continue to the runway. If not
assured then activate CAPS.
- At 1,000 ft AGL, if the landing is still assured, the pilot may continue, recognizing that
the risks associated with landing short, runway overrun or low altitude loss of control
likely exceed those of a timely CAPS deployment. If the landing is not assured by at
least 400 ft (561 ft G5) AGL the pilot should immediately activate CAPS.
• Pilot Incapacitation - Pilot incapacitation may occur from a wide variety of causes,
ranging from a pilot’s medical condition to a bird strike that injures the pilot. If
incapacitation occurs and the passengers are not trained to land the aircraft, CAPS
activation is strongly recommended.
• Mid-Air Collision - A mid-air collision will likely render the airplane uncontrollable by
damaging the control system or primary structure. Unless it is apparent that structural and
control system damage has not occurred, CAPS activation is strongly recommended.
• Structural Failure - A structural failure has never occurred in a Cirrus aircraft. However, if
a structural failure were to occur, CAPS activation is strongly recommended.

The whole-airplane recovery system has gone into every Cirrus, and no
matter how you do the math, it’s clear that the system has saved lives.”
- Flying Magazine, October 2010
General Deployment Information
Speeds to Deploy CAPS
VPD, the maximum demonstrated parachute deployment speed, is not meant to be a limitation, much
like maximum demonstrated crosswind is not a limitation. VPD is the speed CAPS was demonstrated to
during certification. The parachute was demonstrated to survive 165kts deployments during ultimate
drop tests. The ultimate drop tests were accomplished at 125% of the airplane’s maximum gross weight
so it is possible that the parachute could survive deployments at higher speeds. There have been
several successful CAPS deployments at speeds above VPD.

• August 2010, Horton, United Kingdom – A pilot experienced a loss of control situation
and activated CAPS at 187 KIAS. The pilot and one passenger survived without injury.

8
 • September 2010, Mathias, WV – A pilot experienced a loss of control situation in
IMC, possibly due to wind and turbulence, and activated CAPS at 171 KIAS. The pilot and
passenger survived without injury, although they were both injured after exiting the aircraft,
which was suspended in trees, 20 feet above the ground.

• January 2011, Bennett, CO - While practicing approaches in VMC conditions, the pilot
became disorientated and activated CAPS at 187 KIAS. The pilot survived without injury.

Altitude to Deploy CAPS

No minimum or maximum altitude for deployment has been set. This is because the actual
altitude loss during any particular deployment depends upon the airplane’s attitude, altitude and speed
as well as other environmental factors. The altitude loss during a CAPS deployment depends primarily
on the direction that the airplane is traveling at the time of deployment. If the parachute is deployed in
a level attitude, much of the deceleration occurs over a horizontal distance, minimizing altitude loss. If
the parachute is deployed in a vertical descent, the deceleration occurs over a vertical distance, when
altitude loss is at its greatest.

If possible, the pilot should activate CAPS with enough time and altitude for a successful deployment;
therefore the decision to pull should be made as soon as possible. The pilot should have a minimum
altitude in mind to deploy CAPS. If CAPS is deployed too close to the ground, the chance of a
successful deployment greatly decreases. Whenever a pilot is in a situation in which no other survivable
alternative exists, CAPS should be activated regardless of altitude.

• December 2009, Hamilton, Australia - The pilot activated CAPS at 444 ft AGL during
a descent after an engine failure and saved his life.

A Pilot’s Indecision Can Become Fatal

While CAPS has proven to be effective when activated in a timely manner, it does not guarantee
success in all situations. A pilot’s indecision can result in a situation in which the airplane becomes too
fast or descends too low to the ground for CAPS to be effective. There have been 6 fatal accidents
involving CAPS activations as of May 2013.

• 5 low altitude deployments, just before ground impact. Proximity to the ground did not
allow the parachute time to inflate.

• 1 extremely high speed deployment, after icing caused a loss of control situation and the
pilot deployed CAPS at approximately 270 KIAS, well above VNE. The parachute failed
during this excessively high speed deployment.

CAPS Works, But Pilots Still Don’t Use It

“Don’t die with a perfectly good parachute behind you.”
Boris Popov - Founder of BRS
120 - “Fatalities to date, when pilots had a good or better chance
of living if they had activated CAPS” - Rick Beach

9
CAPS Success Stories
A common theme among pilots who have used CAPS to save their lives is that they
had received CAPS training and made the decision to use CAPS on the ground before
they departed.

Jeff Ippoliti
“I am very glad I was flying a Cirrus that day.”
Jeff flew quite often in his Cirrus for business to save travel time.
On April 10, 2004, Jeff picked up his airplane from Fort Lauderdale
after maintenance had been performed, and was returning back to
his home airport. While on an IFR flight plan shortly after takeoff
at 400 ft, Jeff entered IMC conditions. Soon after entering the
clouds his pitot-static instruments on the PFD failed and his
standby instruments were acting erratically. Jeff reported to ATC
that he was “losing gauges” and would be unable to execute an
ILS approach back to the departure airport. He then notified ATC
he was going to activate CAPS. His life was saved and his airplane
was repaired and still flying today. An investigation revealed that
water had entered the pitot-static system after the airplane was
washed, causing the erratic instrument indications.

Verle Wiita
“You may lose the aircraft, but I didn’t lose my life.”
Verle Wiita had been a pilot since June 2004, and often used his
Cirrus to visit his children or to travel to his cottage. On March
15, 2009, Verle was departing Gaithersburg, MD to return home
to Kalamazoo, MI. After departing Gaithersburg, Verle became
spatially disoriented and tried to recover the airplane without
success. Verle reported that the airplane “stalled and started to
spin” and he appropriately decided to use CAPS, saving his life
after a loss of control situation close to the ground.

Matt Richmond
“Let the parachute save your life.”
Matt Richmond had been a pilot since 1992. He is married and
the father of three girls. He worked as a commercial pilot and
instructor for a Greensboro, NC based company, flying clients
and employees all over the eastern U.S. On July 22, 2012, Matt
was returning to Greensboro from Atlanta with three passengers.
While in cruise flight at 9,000 ft the engine RPMs began to rise
rapidly and the oil pressure dropped. Matt began to troubleshoot
and attempted the engine restart procedures with no success.
Matt then diverted to the nearest airport, Pickens County Airport
(LQK). While gliding to the airport, Matt realized his landing was
not assured and decided to use CAPS. Today, Matt is a pilot for a
regional airline and is enjoying life with his family.

10
Pilots that could have used CAPS to save their lives but never did.

“I gotta get my act together here.”

Coconut Creek, FL
On January 15, 2005, an instrument rated pilot departed IFR from
Fort Lauderdale, FL enroute to Naples, FL. The pilot climbed into
IMC conditions soon after takeoff and misinterpreted a series of ATC
instructions. He reported to ATC, “I gotta get my act together here.”
Less than one minute later the pilot reported “avionics problems,”
and 40 seconds after that reported to ATC that he was “losing it.”
The pilot lost control of the airplane, but never used the CAPS.

Loss of control
Meadview, AZ
On October 25, 2006, an instrument rated pilot departed S. Lake
Tahoe, CA with his wife and three children en route to Grand
Canyon, AZ to go hiking. The pilot departed VFR, but picked up an
IFR clearance to his destination after noticing deteriorating weather
ahead. Shortly afterward, the pilot entered an area of convective
activity that contained icing conditions at his altitude of flight. The
pilot reported that he had an emergency due to icing conditions.
Data shows the airplane stalled and entered a spin for 14 rotations
and 45 seconds until impacting the ground. The pilot never activated
the CAPS to recover from the spin.

Attempted power-off landing

Morton, WA
On March 19, 2010, a pilot and passenger were in cruise flight
when the engine lost power. The pilot attempted to reach the
nearest airport, but the airplane collided with trees 2.5 miles short
of the runway, killing the pilot and severely injuring the passenger.
The pilot never activated the CAPS. Cirrus pilots have had a very
successful history when activating CAPS over trees. Most of the
airplanes have been rebuilt and are still flying today.

Barriers Contributing to CAPS Indecision

The U.S. Air Force experienced similar pilot indecision when ejection seats were first introduced.
Several fatal accidents occurred when the pilot never ejected. The culture and mentality among pilots
soon changed and they learned to use and accept the new safety feature that continues to save the
lives of our military personnel – arguably the most experienced pilots in the U.S. Like Air Force pilots in
the past, Cirrus pilots must adjust their mindset and habit patterns to use CAPS in emergencies.

11
Primacy Effect
“Primacy, the state of being first, often creates a strong, almost unshakeable impression.
The process of relearning is more difficult than initial learning.”
– FAA Aviation Instructor’s Handbook
Many Cirrus pilots may have started their flying careers in an airplane without a parachute system.
During initial emergency training for these pilots, CAPS was never an option and therefore never a part
of the emergency procedures checklist. Through proper Cirrus transition training, pilots can unlearn
previous emergency procedure training and develop new habits. Cirrus pilots can and must commit to
learning how to incorporate the CAPS appropriately into emergency situations.

Loss of Situational Awareness

During emergencies, a pilot often becomes fixated on one task and may lose awareness of the bigger
picture. This is especially true for a pilot that has not received or remained current with emergency
training. The pilot must be aware of his or her altitude and situation at all times to be able to activate
CAPS at the appropriate moment.

Hazardous Attitudes Create Obstacles Related to CAPS

Hazardous attitudes can create indecision for the pilot which can be deadly. In an emergency situation
the pilot must have the mindset that he or she will use CAPS, without hesitation, when needed in
an emergency.
• “Off airport landing is safer”
- 60 kts stall vs. 17 kts with CAPS = 12 times more energy to dissipate. After parachute
deployment, a Cirrus aircraft will be descending vertically at approximately 17 kts. During
an attempted landing into a field, the slowest touchdown speed is approximately 60 kts, the
stall speed of the aircraft. Potentially far less energy may be transferred to the airframe and
passengers in a CAPS landing than during an off airport landing at stall speed.
• “Save the Airplane”
- Why? Airplanes can be replaced; people cannot. If that is not convincing enough, many
insurance companies will waive deductibles for CAPS deployments as a reward for the use of
this safety device. They would rather keep you as a customer then deal with your estate.
• “Real pilots don’t need a parachute”
- Some pilots wrongly believe that their piloting ability can get them out of any emergency
situation safely, or that traditional emergency procedures are preferred over using CAPS.
The military’s installation of and use requirement for ejection seats provides an example of
professional, highly trained pilots using a different approach to save the pilot’s life, while
sacrificing the aircraft.

Tips on how to Fly with CAPS

CAPS Specific Training

All Cirrus pilots should receive CAPS specific training, using the Cirrus CAPS Syllabus as a guide from
a qualified Cirrus Training Center or Cirrus Standardized Instructor Pilot.

The CAPS Syllabus is divided into three distinct stages:

KNOWLEDGE CAPS
MUSCLE
& HUMAN DECISION
MEMORY
FACTORS MAKING

12
 • Knowledge & Human Factors - How CAPS works and a discussion of when
and how to use CAPS.
• Muscle Memory - Exercises that help make CAPS deployment automatic,
even in an emergency.
• CAPS Decision Making - Scenario based flights to achieve proficiency
with CAPS decision making.

“Learning is a Lifestyle, not an event.”

– Ian Bentley, Retired Cirrus Aircraft Vice President

Recurrent CAPS Training - Stay Proficient!

Recurrent training is critical to improving and maintaining a pilot’s skillset. Just like other flying skills,
Cirrus recommends that pilots receive recurrent CAPS training on an annual basis to
remain proficient with their CAPS decision making skills.

Initial CAPS Training

CAPS Recurrent Training

Passenger Briefing
All Cirrus pilots should perform a passenger briefing before any flight with passengers onboard.
Teaching passengers how to deploy CAPS in the event of pilot incapacitation can save the lives of both
the passengers and the pilot. The CAPS passenger briefing should teach the passengers to:

• Engage the autopilot using the level button (if equipped)

• Attempt to revive the pilot
• Follow the deployment procedures detailed on the CAPS placard
• Prepare for CAPS touchdown
• Follow egress procedures

13
Takeoff Briefing
A Cirrus pilot is more likely to deploy CAPS quickly during a total loss of engine power or other
emergency if a takeoff briefing is conducted prior to takeoff.

Height Above Ground Level (AGL) Recommended Response

0’ – 500’ (600’ G5) Land Straight Ahead*
500’ (600’ G5) – 2000’ Deploy CAPS Immediately
2000’ or Greater Troubleshoot, Use CAPS as Required
*Activate CAPS immediately if no other survivable alternative exists.

CAPS Deployment Procedures

Note: Always reference and use your current aircraft POH procedures

CAPS Deployment Procedure

1. Activation Handle Cover...................................................REMOVE
2. Activation Handle (Both Hands)......PULL STRAIGHT DOWN
Approximately 45 lbs of force is required to active CAPS. Pull the
handle with both hands in a chin-up style pull until the handle is
fully extended.
After Deployment:
3. Mixture ......................................................................................CUTOFF
4. Fuel Selector ..................................................................................OFF
5. Fuel Pump.........................................................................................OFF
6. Bat-Alt Master Switches.............................................................OFF
If time permits, declare the emergency and announce CAPS
activation prior to turning off the Bat and Alt switches.
7. Ignition Switch................................................................................OFF
8. ELT..........................................................................................................ON
9. Seat Belts and Harnesses ...............................................TIGHTEN
10. Loose Items .........................................................................SECURE
11. Assume emergency landing body position.
Reference the passenger briefing card for the correct emergency
landing body position.
12. After the airplane comes to a complete stop, evacuate
quickly and move upwind.
In high winds the parachute may inflate and drag the aircraft after
touchdown. Remain upwind of the aircraft.

14
Continued CAPS Learning

The Guide to CAPS is just an introduction to CAPS. Cirrus Aircraft

recommends that a pilot continues discussions and CAPS training
with a qualified CSIP or CTC on a regular basis. Associations
such as the Cirrus Owners and Pilots Association (COPA) provide
opportunities for any pilot to discuss and/or learn more about CAPS
through forums and Cirrus Pilot Proficiency Programs (CPPP).

To obtain a copy of the CAPS Syllabus and

receive more information about CAPS, please
visit cirrusaircraft.com/CAPS.

15
©2013, CIRRUS AIRCRAFT CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Part# 2013CAPS-4.18.2013

16