Introduction To Landscape Architecture
Introduction To Landscape Architecture
syllabus
[please feel free to contact the instructor through e-mail to arrange office
hours.]
course description: this course will give some insight into the design approach used by landscape
architects. It will explore the theories that influence our work and the manner in which these theories are
transformed into physical environments.
The course will be divided into two phases. The first phase will offer a theoretical and historical
understanding of the landscape architecture profession; the second will introduce students to the design
process through the development of a landscape architecture design project.
course objectives:
grading:
[late work will be automatically marked down by 10 points each day, unless prior
arrangements have been made with the instructors. Missing more than one class will affect
the participation/attendance grade.]
special needs: every effort will be made to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please notify the
instructors during the first week of class so that any necessary accommodations can be arranged.
reading assignment: students are required to read all the texts indicated in the bibliography and
any additional materials added by the instructors. Students are expected to speak about the
assigned readings and contribute to class discussions.
writing assignment: for classes 2 through 6, students will prepare a brief one to two page
response to the assigned texts. This response should include the following:
_a. a brief summary of the author’s intention or main idea nested within an original thesis.
_b. your reaction to the ideas presented in the readings and any resulting questions that will help
stimulate in-class discussion. Please refrain from using extensive quotations from the text or
posing questions such as, “X asserts such and such, do you agree with that?” Make a concise and
cogent argument.
class discussion: active participation is essential to foster stimulating exchange of ideas and is expected
of all students.
case study assignment: each student is expected to complete a case study assignment. Each
class from week 2 through week 8, students will present a case study that will supplement the
assigned readings and the in-class lecture.
The students presenting case studies for each class should become ‘experts’ on the topic of
study. They will present a brief summary of their case study and will prepare questions. Their
independent investigation should be tied in to the class theme and their questions and expertise
will stimulate and guide the discussion.
Students will self-select a case study from a list provided on the first day of class. Visual material
is essential for the presentation of the case studies. Power Point presentations are highly
recommended (any other format should allow the images to be visible to all the class.)
[re: case study presentations. Power Point or other digital media should be e-mailed to the
instructors by noon on Monday prior to the presentation.]
texts:
(the reader and book contain all the required readings shown in the bibliography)
_course reader: Introduction to Landscape Architecture – USP 510 available @ Clean Copy
bibliography:
Jackson, John B, “The Word Itself,” in Landscape in Sight: Looking at America. H.L. Horowitz, editor. (New
Haven: Yale University Press, 2000), p.299-306
Spirn, Ann, “Constructing Nature: The Legacy of Frederick Law Olmsted,” in Uncommon Ground:
Rethinking the Human Place in Nature (New York: W.W. Norton & Company,1996), 91-113
Smithson, Robert, “Frederick Law Olmsted and the Dialectical Landscape,” in Robert Smithson: Collected
Writings. Jack Flam, editor. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), p.157-171
Forman, Richard T, “The Missing Catalyst: Design and Planning with Ecology Roots,” in Ecology and Design:
Frameworks for Learning (Washington: Island Press, 2002), p.85-109
Del Tredici , Peter. “Brave New Ecology,” in Landscape Architecture Magazine. February 2006. p. 46-52
“Brave New Ecology – or Same Old Mistakes?” Subsection of letters to the Editor. Landscape Architecture
Magazine. April 2006. p.17-25
Class#5: The Working Landscape
Thayer, Robert, “Gray World, Green Heart,” in Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader (Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), p.189-196
France, Robert, “Green World, Gray Heart,” in Harvard Design Magazine, Spring/Summer 2003: p. 31-36
Hill, Kristina, “Green Good, Better, and Best,” in Harvard Design Magazine, Spring/Summer 2003: p. 37-40
Jackson, John B. “ A Sense of Place, a Sense of Time,” in A Sense of Place, A Sense of Time (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1994), p.150-163
Frampton, Kenneth, “ Towards a Critical Regionalism,” in The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture.
Hal Foster, editor. (New York: The New Press, 1998), p.17-34
Lewis, Pierce, “American Landscape Tastes,” in Modern Landscape Architecture: A Critical Review (Cambridge:
MIT Press, 1993), p.2-17
Halprin, Lawrence, “The RSVP Cycles” in Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader (Philadelphia: University
of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), p.43-48
Descombes, George, “Shifting Sites: The Swiss Way, Geneva,” in Recovering Landscape: Essays in
Contemporary Landscape Architecture (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1999), p.78-85
Corner, James, Stan Allen, “Emergent Ecologies,” in CASE: Downsview Park Toronto (Munich: Prestel Verlag,
2001), p.58-65
Olin, Laurie. “Form, Meaning, and Expression in Landscape Architecture,” in Landscape Journal, Fall 1988, vol.
7, no. 2., p. 149-168
Latz, Peter, “Landscape Park Duisburg-Nord: the Metamorphosis of an Industrial Site,” in Manufactured Sites:
Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape (Londpm: Spon Press, 2001), p. 150-165
Young, William, “Fresh Kills landfill: the Restoration of Landfill and Root Penetration,” in Manufactured Sites:
Rethinking the Post-Industrial Landscape (London: Spon Press, 2001), p. 178-192
schedule [subject to change]