CBCT Third Eye in Dental Implant
CBCT Third Eye in Dental Implant
CBCT Third Eye in Dental Implant
Dental Implant
Presented By: Stephanie Chahrouk
Introduction
Disadvantages
the only major disadvantage is that a large amount of information provided by the CBCT
can lead to
o confusion or, even worse, may provide a false sense of security and override the
clinical chairside assessment for inexperienced clinicians.
The transfer of the information obtained on the virtual model to the real patient also can be
difficult.
“Principle of Action Of CBCT”
“The gantry bearing the x-ray source and detector rotates around the patient’s head in 360 degree arcs.”
" 2. Shape and size of the antra, including the position of the antral floor
and its relation to adjacent teeth"
"5. Quantity of alveolar crest/basal bone, allowing direct measuremtns of the height,
width and shape"
"5. capacity to correlate the imaged site with the clinical site"
In the maxilla:
• "Nasal floor",
• "naso-palatine canal",
• "anterior superior alveolar canal",
• "maxillary sinus and related structures,"
• "posterior superior alveolar canal,"
• "maxillary tuberosity, pterygoid plates."
In the mandible:
• "Lingual foramen",
• "incisive canal",
• "genial tubercles",
• "inferior alveolar nerve canal,"
• "mental foramina,"
• "retromolar foramen,"
• "sublingual fossa (lingual undercut),"
• "mylohyoid undercut,"
• "lingula of ascending ramus."
"Patient history"
"Examination "
"Individualized need"
"Implant placement
in an esthetic zone"
"Pre- and post-
grafting/augmentat
ion procedures"
"Post-implant
complications"
"Direct reconstruction provides jaw stability and tissue support for favorable
esthetic reconstruction of the face and adequate filling of the defect."
"Virtual shaping of the graft at the donor site helps to adequately fill the
defect created by tumor resection."
Planing Of implant insertion in the maxilla. To avoid a sinus floor
elevation procedure, an angulated implant position is chosen.
3D virtual planning of the bone graft and the implants
• "*Once the setup of the missing dentition is determined, the planning continues with
the selection of the type of donor graft."
The choice of the graft usually has several aspects.
• "*First, the graft has to anatomically fill the defect and provide sufficient support to
the implant-supported dental structure."
• "*Next, the blood supply of the graft has to be sufficient, with sufficient vessel length
for recirculation attachment."
• "*The distance of the graft to the acceptor vessels of the neck can be large, especially
when the reconstruction concerns a defect in the maxilla."
Preparation of the recipient jaw area
•"*In most large maxillofacial defects the bone needs to be shaped to fit the graft properly
without compromising the blood supply of the graft."
•"*This includes the shaping of the bony borders of the defect and the local soft tissue."
Once the model fits the defect, the transplant will fit as well
Axial tomographic slice of Safety distance around Bone depth assessment on a
maxillary arch demonstrating miniscrew outlined using sagittal tomographic slice.
anticipated miniscrew Dolphin 3D (Dolphin
position relative to incisive Imaging software).
canal.
II-IMAGING FOR POSTOPERATIVE IMPLANT TREATMENT PLANNING
The DICOM files from the scan can be imported into ProPlan; these
can then be superimposed on the original reconstruction plan
Postoperative CBCT scans can also be used to evaluate
consolidation of the graft bone segments to the defect edges
Reasons for a post-op insertion outcome evaluation
The misinterpretation of the images can be attributed to scatter radiation and alteration of
the screw dimensions on the scan.
This is a useful example of how findings from diagnostic imaging should be placed in the
perspective of clinical observations.
Clinician self-assessment.
The orthodontist placing miniscrews should evaluate if the implemented clinical protocol led
to the desired outcome or at least be aware of how close the final result came to the planned
“ideal insertion.”
This self-assessment is the primary and important approach to improve future TAD
insertions.
While a review of the final miniscrew position can be interesting, it is more meaningful if
compared with the virtually placed implant (Figure 18.12).