COMMERCIALSPACETRAVELANDSPACETOURISM
COMMERCIALSPACETRAVELANDSPACETOURISM
COMMERCIALSPACETRAVELANDSPACETOURISM
net/publication/282752474
CITATION READS
1 4,265
4 authors, including:
Rama Murali G K
Indian Space Research Organization
10 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rama Murali G K on 20 April 2016.
2
Another problem is that today’s rocket engines can partly only reusable, and has a less perfect safety
only be operated for 10 minutes or so before major record.
maintenance activities or new motors are required.
Jet engines, as used in modern airliners, last for 3.4 Space Planes- a feasible option for space
month with no technical issues. transportation:
A choice has to be made in the following basic With the current status of technological
questions: development it is possible to design and develop
• Free-flying vehicle vs orbital facility space planes which can take-off and make a perfect
• One vs Two stages return from orbit on auto pilot only, whether it is
• Rockets vs combination with air-breathing night or day and regardless of weather conditions.
• Horizontal vs Vertical takeoff/landing Conceptually a Space plane [2] is three
vehicles combined into one. During launch it is a
3.2 Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) in space rocket, depending on the thrust of its powerful
transportation: engines to gain sufficient altitude and to accelerate
A truly reusable launcher that is easy to to the orbital velocity. In space, the space plane is a
maintain is needed to lower the price of launching satellite, kept in orbit by balance between Earth’s
passengers and cargo into space. Preferably, the gravity and the centrifugal force caused by the
system should involve only one single stage vehicle vehicle’s circular movement around the planet. To
without expendable tanks or boosters. come back to Earth, the bigger engines are fired
The launcher could be designed to have combined opposite to the flight direction, slowing the space
rocket/jet engine that can use oxygen in the plane down so that it falls back into atmosphere.
atmosphere while flying at relatively low altitudes. The vehicle changes into airplane, with its wings
This would mean less onboard propellant, smaller creating sufficient lift for a smooth glide back to
tanks and, therefore a smaller, lighter vehicle. Earth’s surface.
Development of Launchers that fit all of the The technology and challenge will be to combine
stringent space-travel requirements is of primary the relative simplicity of expendable rockets with
importance. the reliability and safety of airplanes, to end up
As long as launches are expensive, the number of with a safe, economic launch vehicle.
satellites and people to be launched each year During step-wise test campaigns similar to those of
remains small. Reusable launchers only become commercial or military aircraft, space planes could
economical at high launch rates, so their be tested much more thoroughly than ordinary,
development and operation are not justified for expandable rockets. They could have higher safety
such a limited market. Expendable launchers margins and more backup systems, and enable safe
therefore remain in use, launch cost remain high aborts during the entire launch phase. The Space
and, in turn, the satellite market stays small. Shuttle, with its various abort scenarios, is partly a
Space tourism may help out, as it offers a clear, space plane, but still depends on expendable rocket
large market worth billions of dollars per year [2], technology.
where success depends on efficient, reusable Future space planes should promise dramatic
vehicles that are making numerous flights. increases in space flight safety levels for launch, re-
Reusable launchers developed for space tourism entry, and landing. They should constantly be
can reduce launch costs dramatically, enabling not under full control, be able to come back from space
only regular tourist flights but also cheap satellite at almost any time (day, night, even in bad
launches. This would offer an enormous boost for weather), need not rely on rescue teams and
the exploration of the solar system, the colonization parachutes for recovery. Moreover, space planes
of the planets, the construction of space factories should offer safe abort possibilities during almost
and solar power-generating satellites, and other all flight phases. Just as airliners are generally safer
possibilities which many have probably not yet than balloons, parachutes, and fighter aircraft, true
been identified. space planes could also improve safety levels for
Development of Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) human spaceflight. Advanced space planes should
would be a major drive for space tourism. be designed to be just as safe as modern airliners,
thus making mass space tourism a possibility.
3.3 Space Shuttle for space transportation:
The Space Shuttle is an incredible machine. It 4. SAFETY MEASURES AND REGULATIONS
is the first and only reusable spacecraft, a heavy lift In USA, the space planes operated by Orbital
launch vehicle that can also return heavy cargos, a Destinations are all subject to the rules of the
spacecraft that, to date, has delivered three times Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which
more people to orbit and brought them back than certifies the passenger launch vehicles and license
all other launchers combined, and has the most companies operating these spacecraft. The FAA
efficient rocket engines ever produced. However, it regulations for space planes are an extension of
is also complex, labour-intensive, very expensive, those for airplanes and have been established to
3
ensure the reliability of the vehicles and operators commercial space transportation in the US FAA is
and the safety of the passengers. The FAA is an US already working in this direction, including
government organization, to prevent commercial studying the extension of air traffic control to Earth
interests from becoming more important than safety Orbit and medical guidelines for space travel
standards. They also supervise the Air and Space passengers.
Traffic Control during atmospheric flight With a total of about 240 human space missions to
The exposure to microgravity is short for suborbital date, the average fatal accident is 1 per 60 flights.
flights so the effects on endovascular, This is extremely high when compared to
neurovestibular, and musculoskeletal systems are commercial aviation: taking a plane to go on
small. Effects of radiation and space motion holidays exposes to only 1 in 2 million probability
sickness are also limited due to short term nature of of not arriving at the destination. Even parachuting
the flight. This means that medical requirements is very safe in comparison, with only about one
can be nominal and a set of guidelines, rather than fatal accident per 100,000 jumps [2].
selection criteria, can be set up for passengers. A new type of rocket is usually declared
Crew medical standards will be based on what operational after only one or two flights, while
exists for commercial airline pilots and astronaut typically 1000 test flights are made with one single
pilots, taking into account maximum radiation plane before a new airliner goes to service.
exposure limits. Mass space tourism will probably require a safety
Radiation is everywhere, also on Earth. It not only level close to that of today’s airlines; otherwise the
comes from space but also out of ground. The market will be too small. Not many people will be
average dose of radiation picked up on the surface comfortable making a spaceflight that is more
of Earth is about 2.6 milli-Sieverts per year [2]. dangerous than flying on an airliner. Moreover, the
However, radon gas coming from the ground or out insurance fees would be prohibitively high
gassed from concrete in new buildings can result in
levels that are five times higher. Spacecraft can be 5. COMMERCIAL ASPECTS OF SPACE
shielded from this normal background radiation by TOURISM
dense materials, such as metals but also by water Growing work on the feasibility of developing
tanks. However, only a limited amount of shielding a passenger space travel industry analogous to air
can be applied otherwise spacecraft would be too travel shows that it has potentially great economic
heavy to launch value; that it would be a very popular service and
Personnel working in nuclear plants are allowed requires far less investment than space agencies
annual dose of some 10 times higher than the already receive; and that substantially funding for
normal exposure on Earth [2]. Using this as a work on this possibility is very desirable from
standard for space tourism would result in a many points of view, economically, socially,
maximum total spaceflight duration of 10weeks per politically and internationally.
year. This should fit with nearly anyone’s annual Surveys performed in Japan, Canada, USA,
holiday schedule, but for the staff of space tourism Germany and England all has a similar pattern,
operators it would be a severe limitation. Probably with most people being keen to make a visit to
space planes pilots and other space tourism workers space.
would be required to rotate between space and It seems probable that popular space travel services
earth based jobs, working most of the year on the can grow throughout 21st century much as air
ground to reduce the radiation effect. Total lifetime travel services grew during 20th century. Indeed, in
radiation dose restrictions may also result in limited view of the growth and globalization of the world
orbit career durations. However, during solar flares economy and financial system over the past 100
phenomenon a result in doses of thousands of milli years, it seems possible that while the air travel
Sieverts, up to 20,000, which can be fatal. took about 100 years from its start in 1903 to reach
In the past, astronauts had estimated 1 in 250 a turnover of $1 trillion/year, space travel might
chance of not surviving a Space Shuttle mission reach that figure within 50 years [3].
[2]. Although at that time this was “par for the In recent years, many small firms have been
course”, a similar reliability figure today would emphasising that it is much more attractive to start
mean one unacceptable Orbital Destinations space with suborbital space tourism, because:
plane crash each year. The corresponding figure for • The required technology is much less
Commercial airline passengers is only 1 in 2 complex
million [2]. Therefore, every effort is to be made in • Ticket costs are much lower
both the design and the operation of the space • The up-front investments are more in the
planes to minimize risks and also the insurance range of millions, not billions
costs. As a successful orbital space tourism business, the
A range of regulations are needed, notably in order Space Shuttle would be far too expensive.
to preserve public safety and enable the insurance Assuming that a passenger module for 74 space
industry to play its role efficiently. The office of tourists could be installed in the Cargo bay of the
4
Orbiter and that 12 flights per year could be made, capability of companies to deliver them.
the ticket price would be around $3.6 million [2]. Unconventional sources of financing may be
While there are probably a number of people required to overcome the difficulties of risk and
willing to pay such an amount for a space flight payback period.
experience, flying 74 of them at the same time In summarizing the future visions of space tourism,
would very shortly deplete the limited available we place no limits to our imaginations. Until the
market. Moreover, the Shuttle turnaround time of humanity’s strong will to keep exploring and
around 3 months would be unacceptable for a large developing the technologies goes on, anything is
scale space tourism operation. possible. Nevertheless, we must face realities of the
To start with, sub-orbital passenger space travel known understanding of the physics of the
can start using existing technology. The key to universe, monetary allocation to projects, political
reducing launch costs is not developing new and societal will, and time. We live in an ambitious
technology but addressing a sufficiently large period; we are at a threshold of opening space for
market. people who dream to see, hear, feel, taste, and
The key issue for reducing launch costs is not experience what wonders the cosmos has to offer.
technical but commercial-to target a market which Space tourism will become a reality. The barriers
can grow large enough to amortise the vehicle that prevents Space Tourism is financing of
development cost, and to generate sufficiently development cost of new launch vehicles.
voluminous operating statistics to achieve Technologically, there are no major concerns in
acceptable levels of reliability and safety. developing sub-orbital planes for Space Tourism.
In order to realize passenger space travel as soon as Space Tourism can play a seminal role in future
possible, collaborations could make most effective because it represents a huge market. More surveys
use of existing technologies. Space agencies’ of and studies are required to determine the size of the
expenditures of some $20 billion/year, if invested market, but current studies indicate that Space
commercially, could generate revenues growing by Tourism can provide the necessary launch volume
some $29 billion/year, earning 10% annual return to achieve cheap access to space. For these reasons,
profits on their investment, or some $2 billion governmental role in funding for development of
annual profits, and creating of the order of 1 new launch vehicles and providing a good,
million new jobs/year [3]. stringent legal framework for the industry becomes
The only way in which enormous investment in important.
space technology can start to earn an economic
return is through the development of a space References:
tourism industry. Economically, general public
space travel and tourism is the most attractive [1] Reggestad, Kemper, Mendell, “Space
paradigm for post-cold war, 21st century space Tourism-from dream to reality”, , International
activities. 51st International Astronautical Congress 2-6
It seems that space tourism will grow into a viable Oct 2000/Rio de Janerio, Brazil
business and a major economical factor as the [2] Pelt, Michel, “Space Tourism-Adventures in
limited market surveys done so far indicate that the Earth and Beyond”, Van-Copernicus
many people are interested in going into space. One books, New York
survey [2] concluded that about 70 percent of the [3] Daniel O’Neil, Ivan Bakery, John Mankins,
Japanese want to make such a trip and that most of Thomas Rogers and Eric Stallmer, “General
them are willing to pay at least three months of Public Space Travel and Tourism-Volume-1
salary to make a flight. A recent market study by Executive Summary”, NASA Summary of a
Futron Corporation indicates that commercial space Space Act agreement study, Washington DC,
tourism could generate over $1 billion revenues by February 19-21, 1997
2021 [2]. A good promotional campaign, with [4] F Ellingsfeld, D Schaetzler, “The cost of
advertisements and publicity stunts like flying capital for Space Tourism Venture”, 51st
famous people into space, should increase the International Astronautical Congress 2-6 Oct
popularity of space tourism 2000/Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
[5] P Collins, “Public Choice Economics and
6. CONCLUSION Space Policy: Realising Space Tourism”, 51st
For space tourism to open up as a visible international Astronautical Congress 2-6 Oct
commercial venture the most likely starting point 2000/Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
will be from private aerospace development [6] M Livingston, “Space Tourism and RLVs: You
companies. In terms of investment in a space can’t have one without the Other!”, 51st
tourism start-up company, there is a gap between International Astronautical Congress 2-6 Oct
requirements of potential investors and the 2000/RiodeJaneiro,Brazil