The Global Sport Ecosystem PDF
The Global Sport Ecosystem PDF
The Global Sport Ecosystem PDF
Joe Bailey spent the first 25 years of his professional career associated with the
sport of American football (Dallas Cowboys and the NFL). When he joined one
of the world’s leading executive search and assessment firms, Russell Reynolds
Associates, in 1995, it was natural to begin by focusing on assignments in
functional areas in football (NFL and the CFL). He then broadened his client
base to include basketball (NBA), horseracing (Hong Kong Jockey Club), Olympic
sports (Salt Lake) and other competitions. Subsequently, he did work with
various media companies in the print sectors (The Sporting News), television
and radio (Vulcan Media), facilities (Reunion Arena/American Airlines Center),
and internet (Rivals.com). He expanded the practice to include companies that
provided goods and services such as accounting (PricewaterhouseCoopers) and
equipment (Wilson Sporting Goods).
The Global Sport Ecosystem (GSE) was first conceived in 1996 by Bailey as
a straightforward way to both explain and compare and contrast the “sports”
practice from the “media” practice and “entertainment “practice. The GSE has
been refined over some 20 years but its basic elements remain the same.
DECEMBER 2014 1
RESEARCH STUDY
From 1995 until 2005, Bailey conducted more than 250 assignments,
predominately within the GSE while continuing his operational experience by
simultaneously managing several offices for the firm, including the New York
flagship operation.
During the early stages of his service consulting career, he became aware of the
underlying differences among “sports,” “media, “and “entertainment” in both
their business models and in the leadership and management talent required
to execute the business. In order to correctly execute a search assignment, a
thorough understanding of the business model is required, followed by a clear
understanding of the role and responsibility of the position.
His career in sport got off to a great start in 1970 in the area of human
performance evaluation. His first position was as a player scout for the Dallas
The single most important Cowboys Football Club, reading, grading, and writing thousands of reports on
skill for any leadership college players. Missing the evaluation of a player was a fire-able offense.
consultant is the ability And, of course, each player was a “position” player, so not only were all scouts
to evaluate clients and judging players based on quantitative and qualitative measurements, the
candidates. This skill can department was also comparing and contrasting players against one another.
only be acquired by practice,
practice, practice—using
tools that are learned
EXECUTIVE TIP
coupled with countless
hours of interviewing and The prospective chief executive officer may be strong in many areas
writing. Evaluating a person and may be a good chemistry fit – it all boils down to competency and
incorrectly can be fatal to chemistry – but if prospective candidates cannot compete against
the very best, everyone loses. Bailey quickly learned that people are
your professional career.
the only form of a sustainable, competitive advantage. It is literally
impossible to compete over an extended period of time without the
best talent in critical positions.
Leaders also learn that they really only have ”full control” over two
areas of their business – talent and culture. Coaches know this also,
at least all the ones considered world class coaches and managers.
Attitude
Behavioral Motivation
Operating
IQ Medical Cultural Fit
Drive
DNA
Interpersonal Energy
Personal Ecosystem
talent competency Personal
& chemistry personal
Compensation
Additional Sensitivity
Special to Risk
Potential Relationships
Broad-gauged Reputation Habits
Personal Point of View
Experience Bias
Education
frame
the Deep knowledge General
world
Knowledge
Experience
Languages
International
Experience
Broad
Application
Relevant
Knowledge
DECEMBER 2014 3
RESEARCH STUDY
Bailey also began to analyze the characteristics of talent that populated the GSE,
Content which he divided into three distinct business-to-business sectors: Content,
Providers
Channels of Distribution, and Service Providers. For example, the “content”
businesses, their culture and the people seemed similar to the industrial
sector. There was a process mentality, a systems-based orientation, a belief
in executing fundamental tasks through continual execution, and union
relationships. Leaders tended to be resistant to change, risk-adverse, not
overly innovative, single-vision focused, hierarchical, turned inward into their
work and functioned in silos. They were mission-driven with a heavy reliance
Distribution
Channels on teamwork.
The “channel of distribution” talent and culture fell into two camps. The media
side was populated by bright risk-takers, mercurial personalities who were
self-assured to the point of arrogance, creative, entrepreneurial, but poor on
structure, process, and strategy. The second camp focused almost solely on
operations and margins with little regard for the end-user consumer.
The third business sector, “solution providers,” was appropriately titled. This
Goods & housed leaders who enjoyed multiple, complex challenges and opportunities.
Services
Providers They had a sales DNA, were optimistic, gregarious, personable, and relationship
driven. They respected structure but were very proactive, entrepreneurial, and
had specialized knowledge about their own areas.
EXECUTIVE TIP
DECEMBER 2014 5
RESEARCH STUDY
EXECUTIVE TIP
The second business sector is comprised of any entity whose primary business
is to distribute content on various platforms and channels. Some content
providers are also involved in distribution, which explains why these two
sectors overlap. Generally speaking, over-the-air/free TV, cable, internet,
satellite, radio, print and facilities of all kinds – arenas, big box stadiums, tracks,
sports complexes — all primarily exist to distribute content.
DECEMBER 2014 7
RESEARCH STUDY
Distribution Content
Channels Providers
Diversified Sport,
Entertainment,
PE-Backed Companies
Goods &
Services Providers
Viewers Participants
Watchers Male/Female
Readers Youth/Senior
Listeners Attendees Individual/Team
People attending events Amateur/Professional
Oxygen Required
The ecosystem does not function without the “citizens” of the ecosystem…the
consumer. To illustrate their importance, a distinct sector surrounds the three
overlapping sectors and provides the energy that allows the ecosystem to
breathe. This visually demonstrates how vital the consumer is to the system.
They are the sun in the ecosystem. It is, intellectually, a “no brainer” to see
the business-to-consumer and business-to-government connection, but our
visual emphasizes their importance, size, and diversity. We estimate that 77%
of the population of the United States contributes to the GSE in the U.S.
Through research, it seems that the clearest way to define the consumer is
to divide the category into five groups. Again, portions overlap and common If the purpose of marketing
sense dictates where and when it occurs. The first is the Participant Group. is to increase brand loyalty
This represents people who actually participate in a sport. The definition through retention and
is male/female, youth to senior, casual to rigorous exercise for wellness acquisition of new followers,
to competitive amateurs and professionals, individual sport to team sport, then the importance of
amateur to professional, Olympic to Paralympic. What is common to all? Sweat branding takes center stage
equity! It is why a famous sports writer named the business the “perspiring in order to protect attendance.
arts”.
Participants
The Participant Group is a key indicator of the health of a sport. For example,
despite its present popularity, participation in American football in the U.S. is
declining while a number of other sports are on the rise. What does this say
about its future and who is guarding the game?
DECEMBER 2014 9
RESEARCH STUDY
Attendees
The second consumer category is Attendees. To those that operate any content
provider, this should be the single most valuable group. If attendance is
declining, the sport, the teams, the leagues are in trouble. What does decreasing
attendance say about the value of the event and the sport? A studio-based
sport is one step from becoming an irrelevant sport. Could it be a result of
pricing, market conditions, or the customer experience?
Since sport delivers the most
If one of several factors required to create customer or fan happiness is missing, predictable audience in terms
attendance declines. Since attendees make the greatest personal commitment of numbers and demographics,
in time and money to your business, the care for this group cannot be media channels are paying
overemphasized. And with so many consumer alternatives, many of which are escalating ”rights fees” to
free or available “on demand,” customer expectations continue to rise. acquire this Observer Group.
EXECUTIVE TIP
Casuals
The next category is the Observer Group. It consists of viewers, watchers,
readers of sport, i.e., followers; passive but interested. This category is
served by the general sports media. Since sport delivers the most predictable
audience in terms of numbers and demographics, media channels are paying
escalating “rights fees” to acquire this Observer Group. Collegiate sports, in
an effort to capitalize on these rights fees, have created seismic shifts in their
own ecosystem. The decisions by leaders in the collegiate sport category have
been interesting. “Economics” in college athletics, just as in the global economy,
is playing an increasing role in major decisions such as alignment, revenue
versus non-revenue sports, etc. The media is changing the amateur scene in
increasingly negative ways.
Impact of Government
This “different way” brings us to the Government Group, and the business
to government relationship. In the U.S., the lack of direct government
involvement in the industry is an anomaly to the rest of the world. Even the
United States Olympic Committee’s charter has no government funding, but
plenty of oversight policies to be followed. While no national government
entity exists to oversee the industry, many U.S. cities recognize the economic
and psychological importance of the industry and have formed sports
commissions. Since the industry is “event-oriented,” enticing “events” has a
positive economic impact. In many countries, there is a senior-level cabinet
minister or government office responsible for the oversight of the sport
category. This office oversees and coordinates activities in sport that the
government supports financially and strategically.
The dilemma is that for the large-scale, world events such as the Olympics,
Paralympics, the Youth Games, the World Cup, World Championships, etc.,
the U.S. misses winning the competition to host them because it has no
coordinating body similar to other countries. Eventually, the U.S. government
will form a public, private partnership to enable the country to compete more
effectively for large scale events with massive economic benefits. This will
require enlightened leadership. In the meantime, governments around the
world are pouring money into the industry.
DECEMBER 2014 11
RESEARCH STUDY
EXECUTIVE TIP
EXECUTIVE TIP
DECEMBER 2014 13
RESEARCH STUDY
Threats
In any ecosystem, there are substantial threats that must be acknowledged
and combated. Whether global, national, or local in nature, since we have
a “global” ecosystem, the following areas are considered “real, serious, and
consequential” threats:
The Global Sport Leadership Practice of RSR Partners helps solve complex
talent issues for organizations involved in the sports ecosystem. Our
team of domain experts serves content providers; distribution channels,
including media and facilities; and solution providers from healthcare
providers and sporting goods manufacturers to construction and food and
beverage suppliers. Our capabilities include executive leadership searches
for commissioners, owners, chairmen, board members, head coaches,
managers, and senior management. We also provide assessment, team
effectiveness consulting and succession planning services.
CONTACT US
280 Park Avenue, 30th Floor–West Building, New York, NY 10017 I Phone: (212)-661-5725 www.rsrpartners.com