Contact Pressure and Yield Stress

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Contact Pressure and Yield Stress

In the case of point contacts (round or elliptical) that we may not be


justified in using the Hertzian contact equations. For these to be true, it
is assumed that the contact is elastic, that the contact zone is flat, that
there are no shear stresses in the contact zone and that the contact
radius is much smaller than the radius of the ball or cylinder. This will not
be the case if the nominal contact pressure exceeds the yield stress of
one or other side of the contact. In this case, we cannot sensibly use the
Hertz equations and instead must use an elasto-plastic finite element
model to evaluate the contact conditions. Such models lead to the
perhaps slightly unexpected conclusion that increasing the load on our
ball or cylinder simply increases the size of the plastic zone. If the ball is
the harder surface, we simply have a brinell hardness test.

The mean pressure for FULL plastic contact (analogous to a hardness test)
is about 3Y where Y is the uni-axial yield stress. Initiation of plastic flow
starts at a lower pressure and occurs when the max shear stress reaches
the shear yield stress k for the material. The maximum shear stress in a
Hertz contact is buried at 0.47a below the surface and is approximately
0.47 * mean contact pressure. This all means that for a Tresca material
the mean contact pressure for initiation of yield is about 1.1Y. But note
that the surface material is still elastic - there is a miniscule plastic
enclave under the surface.

If we now add mechanical shear, because of sliding action, we would


expect a further decrease in either the applied load or temperature at
which yield occurs.

The upshot of all this, is confirmation of the general pointlessness, pun


intended, of running a matrix of tests with a ball on flat specimen
configuration at different loads and temperatures. We learn nothing if our
test simply produces the same result, regardless of test conditions. This is
equivalent to trying to run a tensile test in which we try to control the
load at levels in excess of the ultimate tensile strength of the material
sample; it does not matter what load we attempt to apply, we always get
the same answer.

 If you want to avoid plastic flow, do not exceed 1.1Y.


 If the contacts in your real application do not involve pressures
close to or in excess of the 3*Y, do not use conditions that produce
contact pressure in excess of 3*Y in your test system.
 If you choose to use test conditions that give contact pressures in
excess of 3*Y, don’t bother running a matrix of tests at different
loads.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy