Two Radio Pulsars With Magnetar Fields
Two Radio Pulsars With Magnetar Fields
Two Radio Pulsars With Magnetar Fields
V. M. Kaspi
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
I. H. Stairs
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
R. N. Manchester, G. Hobbs
ATNF – CSIRO, Epping, Australia
F. Camilo
Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Both of these pulsars were discovered in the Parkes Multibeam Pulsar Sur-
vey (see e.g. Manchester et al. 2001). PSR J1847−0130 has a spin period of 6.7 s
and inferred surface dipole magnetic field1 of 9.4×1013 G. PSR J1718−37184 has
a period of 3.4 s and magnetic field of 7.4 × 1013 G. The magnetic fields of both
pulsars are well above the “quantum critical field” ≃ 4.4 × 1013 G above which
some models predicted radio emission should not occur (Baring & Harding 1998).
1
Calculated
p via the standard magnetic dipole formula (Manchester & Taylor 1977) B = 3.2 ×
1019 P Ṗ G.
1
2 M. A. McLaughlin et al.
Both pulsars have average radio luminosities, indicating that photon splitting
does not suppress pair production at these magnetic field strengths.
In Table 1, we compare the spin-down properties, distances and X-ray lu-
minosities of the high-field pulsars and the AXPs. Using archival ASCA data,
we measure an upper limit to the X-ray luminosity of J1847−0130 that is lower
than the luminosities of all but one AXP. We have analyzed a Chandra obser-
vation with J1718−37184 in the field and detect the pulsar with a soft, thermal
spectrum and with an X-ray luminosity much lower than that of any of the
AXPs. H-atmosphere spectral fits yield a temperature that is consistent with
standard neutron star cooling curves (Kaminker et al. 2001).
Name P B D L (2 – 10 keV)
(s) (1014 G) (kpc) (1033 ergs s−1 )
1E 1048.1−5937 6.5 5.0 ≥ 2.7 ≥5
1E 2259+586 7.0 0.59 4−7 40 − 100
4U 0142+61 8.7 1.3 ≥ 1.0 or ≥ 2.7 ≥ 10 or ≥ 70
RXS J1708−40 11.0 4.6 ∼8 ∼ 500
1E 1841−045 11.8 7.1 5.7−8.5 20 − 50
PSR J1718−37184 3.4 0.74 3−5 0.0009
PSR J1847−0130 6.7 0.94 6 − 11 < 3−8
It is unclear how the high-field pulsars and AXPs can have such similar
spin-down parameters but such different emission properties. One possibility is
that high-field pulsars and AXPs have similar dipole magnetic fields but AXPs
have quadrupole (or higher) components. Finding more high-field radio pulsars
is essential for understanding the relationship between these two populations
and constraining the pulsar emission mechanism. Because of selection effects
against the detection of long-period radio pulsars, there may be many more of
these objects than are currently known. Finally, the discovery of radio emission
from these two pulsars shows that there is no reason, a priori, why the AXPs
cannot be radio emitters. While searches for radio emission from the currently
known AXPs have so far been unsuccessful or unconfirmed (but see Malofeev et
al., these proceedings), this may simply be the result of unfavorable beaming.
References