Ipv4/Ipv6 Transition Experience and The Features of Stateless Translation (Ivi)
Ipv4/Ipv6 Transition Experience and The Features of Stateless Translation (Ivi)
Ipv4/Ipv6 Transition Experience and The Features of Stateless Translation (Ivi)
2
AS-level (2)
3
After IPv4 exhaustion
• In 172 days
– Increase AS number from 3K 35K
– Make 99% of the content IPv6 available
– Mission impossible
4
Ready and not ready
Contents: Not ready Contents
172 days 6
Who will be mostly affected
• The existing IPv4-only users
– They are happy now, until there are IPv6-only
content/users
– Upgrade to dual stack is not very urgent
– Upgrade to dual stack should not degrade
their experience
• The new users
– They do NOT accept the service if they
cannot access the global IPv4 Internet.
7
SP should make a decision in 172 days
(IPv4+NAT44) IPv6
(IPv4+NAT44) + +
IPv6 translation-to-IPv4
8
IPv4/IPv6 transition standard roadmap
Solution Standard /Draft Standard note
roadmap
IVI (stateless) RFC6052* (addr-fmt), RFC6144* Est. Mar, IETF
(framework), RFC6145* (xlate), 2011 behave
RFC6147 (dns), WG
ivi*, [in IETF-editor queue]
NAT64 RFC6052* (addr-fmt), RFC6144* Est. Mar, IETF
(stateful) (framework), RFC6145* (xlate), 2011 behave
RFC6146 (stateful), RFC6147 (dns) WG
Dual Stack lite Dual-stack-lit-06 [AD Est. Q2, IETF
Evaluation::Revised ID Needed] 2011 softwire
WG
6RD RFC5969 Aug, 2010 IETF
softwire
WG
NAT444 nat444-03 Est. Not in
Unknown IETF WG
* CERNET authors/co-authors 9
If
IPv6
is
so
great,
how
come
it
is
not
there
yet?
• Applications
– Need upfront investment,
stacks, etc.
– Similar to Y2K, 32 bit vs.
“clean address type”
• Network
– Need to ramp-up
investment
– No “push-button”
transition
IPv4
IPv6-‐only
2,000
Universities
200
Universities
25,M
Users
2M
Users
11
To encourage transition
• CERNET (IPv4)
– Congested and charged.
• CERNET2 (IPv6)
– Light loaded and free of charge.
12
IPv4 and IPv6 traffic
IPv4 IPv6
13
So what are IPv6 traffics
• Mostly video
• Anything which cannot be accessed via
IPv4
• If both IPv4/IPv6 are available, the users
prefer to use IPv4 (better experience)
• Except EE and CS students
14
When will be the X’-day?
• We have asked our customers
– Can we turn off CERNET (IPv4) and only
provide CERNET2 (IPv6) services?
– The answer is absolutely NO! If there is a
single IPv4-only content in the global Internet,
we can not turn off IPv4.
• We have almost reached X-day (IPv4
address depletion)
• When will be the X’-day (turn off IPv4)?
15
The killer application
• Video?
• P2P?
• Internet of Things?
• The
intercommunication
with the IPv4 Internet
is the killer application
of IPv6.
16
We invented IVI
Global Global
IPv4 IPv6
IPv4-
accessible
servers/clients
17
Translation scenarios
xlate xlate
The IPv4 An IPv6 An IPv4 The IPv6
Internet Network Network DNS Internet
DNS
Scenario 1 “an IPv6 network to the IPv4 Internet” < NAT64 Scenario 3 “an IPv4 network to the IPv6 Internet” < NAT64
IVI { Scenario 2 “the IPv4 Internet to an IPv6 network” Scenario 4 “the IPv6 Internet to an IPv4 network”
xlate xlate
An IPv4 An IPv6 The IPv4 The IPv6
Network DNS Network Internet Internet
DNS
Scenario 5 “an IPv6 network to an IPv4network” < NAT64 Scenario 7 “the IPv6 Internet to the IPv4 Internet”
IVI { Scenario 6 “an IPv4 network to an IPv6 network” Scenario 8 “the IPv4 Internet to the IPv6Internet”
18
Stateless translation (IVI)
IPv6
IVI
IPv4
A subset of IPv6
addresses
Real IPv4 host mirrored IPv6 host mirrored IPv4 host Real IPv6 host
20
1:N IVI
• If R=256
• A /24 is equivalent to a /16
21
1:N dIVI
H0
DS
Hgw0
H2
Hgw2 DS
The IPv6
Internet HgwK HK
DS
22
Make things easy and simple
• Service Continuity
– Only upgrade core network to dual stack
– Keep the existing IPv4 access network running as
usual
• Minimal customer Impact
– Deploy IPv6-only data center with 1:1 IVI to move
content to IPv6 without loosing the IPv4 users
– Deploying new IPv6-only access network with 1:N
double IVI for new customers using shared IPv4
addresses
• Incremental investment
– Incremental deployment with direct returns.
23
Remarks (1)
• Dual stack and tunnel are coexistence
technologies
– 10 year experience indicates that we have not
achieved transition via dual stack and tunnel
• Let’s try translation now
– We need a single Internet, not two Internets
(IPv4 and IPv6)
– Due to the long tail, the transition cannot be
achieved in short time
24
Remarks (2)
• The competition is what type of translation
technologies we will use
IPv4 Internet IPv4 Internet
IVI
User
27