Coal News From Ccai 30.04.2020 PDF
Coal News From Ccai 30.04.2020 PDF
Coal News From Ccai 30.04.2020 PDF
2020
POWER
FINANCIAL EXPRESS
Demand for power is likely to fall by 1 per cent in the current fiscal with discom losses widening by
almost Rs 20,000 crore as the coronavirus lockdown continues to impact economic activities, says Icra.
According to the rating agency, thermal plant load factor (PLF) is also expected to decline to 54 per cent
in FY 2021 from 56 per cent in FY 2020.
“Assuming resumption of full operations by industrial and commercial establishments from July 2020,
while May and June continue to witness partial activity, the demand for power is likely to decline by one
per cent in FY2021,” it said.
According to the agency, electricity consumption from high tariff paying industrial and commercial
consumers has significantly declined due to the lockdown.
“This has in turn impacted revenues and cash collection by discoms from these high tariff paying
consumers as well as other customer segments. As a result, the book loss level for the discoms at all India
level is likely to increase by Rs 20,000 crore in FY2021, ” it said.
Icra further noted that any extension in the lockdown period would have further downside risk for the
demand growth.
“The decline in thermal PLFs would further delay the resolution of stressed thermal assets, a majority of
which are impacted by lack of long-term power purchase agreements,” Icra Group Head and Senior Vice
President – Corporate Ratings Sabyasachi Majumdar said.
On the other hand, delay in collection by discoms would aggravate the payment delays by them to power
generation companies, which are already reeling under large payment dues of more than Rs 92,000 crore
as of February 2020.
BUSINESS LINE
Considering the difficulties faced by the industries during the Covid-induced lockdown, the TS
regulator suo-moto passed orders providing relief measures for industrial consumers under Section 108
of the Electricity Act, 2003.
The industrial associations have represented to the government that the industrial units work on a
precarious state of finances and any minor disruptions in their regular flow of works will upset their
production and cash flows and their overall financial health is affected.
While the loss and difficulties of workers and employees is predictable, it is equally difficult for units and
businesses to pay the salaries and wages by taking additional loans while foregoing the production and
revenues. The industrial associations have informed that the Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises (MSME)
units with zero/minimum financial reserves may be worst hit by the current prevailing situation and
requested for relief measures to save the MSME sector in the State.
The requests of the industry associations were discussed in the State Cabinet meeting held on April 19
and Chaired by Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao. After detailed discussions, the government decided
to extend the following relief measures to the industries in the State.
It had decided that the “electricity bills during the lockdown period will be collected as per actual
consumption only and the fixed charges for the same period shall be deferred till May 31 without any
penalty and interest. Further, those industries which pay the bills within due date shall get one per cent
rebate of billed amount.”
The Electricity Regulatory Commission chaired by T Sriranga Rao, Chairman, accepted the directions of
the government for implementation of these relief measures to various industries.
BUSINESS LINE
Addressing the media by an online platform, Raut said that for the next three months, industrial and
commercial consumers will not have to pay fixed charges. There will be no increase in tariff for agriculture
consumers, and those using power derived from solar roof sources will not have to pay any additional
charges, he added.
Other measures
The power tariffs of Adani Electricity, Tata Power, BEST Undertaking and MSEDCL has already been
reduced after interacting with the management of the companies. Solar energy grid support charge has
been reduced to zero, which will make it possible to promote the solar energy sector. The State
government is also trying to increase the subsidy cap for Marathwada and Vidarbha for the growth of
industries in the State and for the rest of Maharashtra, Raut said.
The decision to reduce power tariff by coordinating with the power companies and the State Electricity
Regulatory Commission will go a long way in boosting the industry and business in the state, the Energy
Minister added.
Companies falling under essential services will be billed according to their usage. Meter readings for the
households will not be conducted. The electricity bill will be generated from the average bill of the
previous month. The March bill will have to be paid by May 15 and the April bill by May 31, he said.
Uninterrupted power
The companies should also take precautions to maintain power supply in their areas. They will have to
prepare a contingency, keeping in mind the month of Ramzan, higher power requirement in summer and
forth-coming monsoon. It has also been decided to honour the best-performing employees who have made
a significant contribution to the uninterrupted power supply during this period, Raut said.
The report covers market share and shipment rankings across the Indian solar supply chain in 2019.
During the calendar year (CY) 2019, India installed 7.3 GW of solar power across the country,
consolidating its position as the third-largest solar market in the world, it said.
India also had a robust pipeline of utility-scale projects under development of 23.7 GW at the end of 2019,
with another 31.5 GW of tenders pending auction, it added.
"The solar market leaders have changed in almost every category compared with last year. With a tough
year ahead, we expect strong, resilient, and innovative companies continue to do well," said Raj Prabhu,
CEO of Mercom Capital Group, in the statement.
The report reveals that the top ten large-scale project developers account for 68 per cent market share in
2019.
ReNew Power was the top utility-scale developer during 2019, while Azure Power owns the largest
project pipeline, the report said.
There are around 29 large-scale solar developers with a project pipeline of 100 MW or more in India.
Large-scale solar installations in 2019 accounted for 85 per cent with 6.2 GW. Also, solar accounted for
41 per cent of new power capacity additions in 2019 behind coal which accounted for 44 per cent.
Companies offering engineering, procurement, construction (EPC) services saw a lot of projects moved
to 2020 due to delays caused by general elections, land, and evacuation issues, among others, the report
said.
Tata Power Solar had the largest cumulative rooftop portfolio, followed by CleanMax Solar, the report
said.
At the end of 2019, the top ten rooftop solar installers represented 34 per cent of the total rooftop solar
market share.
In 2019, the rooftop solar market growth came down by 33 per cent compared to CY (calendar year) 2018.
Huawei led the solar inverter market in India in 2019, followed by Sungrow. Other top string inverter
suppliers included Growatt, Solis Inverters, and Delta Power Solutions.
At the end of December 2019, Trina Solar was the leading module supplier to India in terms of cumulative
shipments, while Waaree Energies, Adani, and Risen Energy held the top spot in CY 2019. The top ten
module suppliers accounted for over 62 per cent of the market in 2019.
Ganges Internationale was the top supplier of solar mounting structures in 2019, followed by Purshotam
Profiles and Strolar. Scorpius Trackers was the top supplier of solar trackers in 2019.
Rays Power Experts and CleanMax Solar were the top open access developers as of December 2019.
Ecoppia was the top supplier of solar robotic cleaning systems as of December 2019, it added.
HOME
BUSINESS LINE
This is according to data compiled by the Mining and Mineral Statistics Division of Indian Bureau of
Mines. It functions as the nodal agency for statistics on mineral sector and releases this information.
During in February 2020, coal production was at 780 lakh tonnes (lt), lignite at 47 lt, natural gas (utilised)
was at 2257 million cubic metres, petroleum (crude) at 24 lt, and bauxite at 21.9 lt.
During the month under review, chromite production was at 3.95 lt, copper concentrate at 5,000 tonnes,
gold at 162 kg, iron ore at 239 lt, and lead concentrate at 0.32 lt.
Compared to February 2019, higher mineral production was reported by zinc concentrate (33.2 per cent),
iron ore (31.3 per cent), chromite (18.2 per cent), lead concentrate (14.2 per cent), coal (11.7 per cent),
limestone (4.5 per cent), manganese ore (3.3 per cent), lignite (2.6 per cent) and bauxite (1.3 per cent).
Lower production was reported by copper concentrate (minus 60.7 per cent), gold (minus 29.6 per cent),
natural gas (utilised) (minus 9.6 per cent), petroleum (crude) (minus 6.4 per cent) and phosphorite’ (minus
1.8 per cent).
With the UK government keen to support locally-owned businesses first, fund infusion from Tata Sons
was expected to be a fallback option for Tata steel’s European businesses. But support from the Indian
parent now seems unlikely.
The UK arm of Tata Steel has reportedly sought an estimated £500 million ( ₹4,750 crore) from the British
government to survive the coronavirus lockdown period, according to UK media reports.
Tata Sons has to assign funds to meet several other financial commitments and Tata Steel will essentially
have to fend for itself, officials said.
But Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran had warned early this year that the Indian entity cannot keep
funding losses.
Tata Sons plans to keep a war chest ready of over $5 billion (₹38,000 crore), as per the sources cited. The
immediate priority is to keep ready funds of around $1.5 billion (₹11,400 crore) for urgent infusions into
some businesses such as the airlines companies (Vistara and AirAsia) and Tata Motor's loss-making
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR ) unit.
“European steel demand has sharply reduced compared to normal conditions and many of our customers
paused production, including European car manufacturers. We therefore reduced production at some of
our European mills to match this lower demand. Our European business is focused on preserving cash and
liquidity to tide it over during the challenging period,” a Tata Steel spokesperson told ET.
Though Tata Steel’s India operations are the most profitable in the industry, Tata Steel Europe has burnt
free cash flow of nearly ₹26,000 crore between FY14 and FY19. However, some of that is masked by the
debt arrangement between the parent company and Tata Steel Europe.
Post the Corus acquisition in 2007, Tata Steel had set up an off-balance sheet arrangement in order to
effectively shield Tata Steel shareholders from the high debt levels incurred by the European assets.
However, in the face of mounting losses and continued cash burn at Tata Steel Europe (TSE), Tata Steel
management has, in order to stem some of the cash losses, replaced over time most of the external debt
on TSE’s books with inter-group debt.
Anil Singhvi, chairman of corporate advisory firm Ican Investment Advisors, says Tata sons will do well
not to put good money after bad. “Most of their overseas venture and tieups have been money-guzzlers,
be it Docomo or Corus,” he said.
Since the acquisition in 2007, the UK business has not been able to generate profits. Analysts say at least
₹30,000 crore capital has been deployed in the Europe and UK operations since 2007. This has raised
concerns of a major impairment or write-down in Tata Steel’s book and criticism over why should such
bleeding businesses be supported by Tata Sons.
Tata Steel saw a significant increase in its overall debt in FY19, primarily because of the Bhushan Steel
and Usha Martin acquisitions. But it has reduced its consolidated gross debt to ₹1,09,900 crore in the
December 2019 quarter from ₹1,11,600 crore in September 2019.
Net debt stood at ₹1,04,600 crore at the end of December 2019. In January, the company repaid $500
million (about ₹3,500 crore) of debt and refinanced 1.75 billion (₹14,000 crore) of loan at better terms
and better prices.
“Most of the subordinated inter-company debt, roughly £4.3 billion (₹40,700 crore) of the £5.3 billion
(₹50,200 crore) inter-group debt at the end of FY19 on TSE’s balance sheet, is effectively equity – while
Tata Steel Europe accrues interest on sub-ordinated debt of £4.3 billion, TSE doesn’t pay cash interest on
these loans,” said Satyadeep Jain, analyst, Ambit Capital.
BUSINESS LINE
Ruias-led private ports operator, Essar Ports Ltd, said it is expecting to sustain a reasonable performance
in the current fiscal, despite the ongoing crisis.
Rajiv Agarwal, MD & CEO, Essar Ports Ltd, said the company posted 23.5 per cent growth in cargo
handling during 2019-20, and “with all our terminals operational, we expect to sustain a reasonable level
of performance in the ongoing financial year".. Essar Ports has four terminals with a combined handling
capacity of 110 million tonnes per annum.
The company has its key customers in steel, oil and power industries, which manufacture products under
the essential services category. “Given that we facilitate the cargo requirements of these businesses, we
have sustained operations even during this crisis,” said Agarwal adding that the company faced some
lockdown-related issues in operations and manpower availability but the supply chain and operations
remained unaffected.
In an e-mail response to BusinessLine queries, Agarwal said that on account of lower throughput
following disruptions in cargo movement, the ports sector was facing liquidity and cashflow issues, loss
of business/ revenue and delay in projects and commissioning of new facilities.
“The revival is also expected to be gradual. To overcome the challenges, the Centre needs to look at
several measures which will not only boost demand but also provide relief for the industry players to
function in smooth manner,” Agarwal said.
Pointing to measures like reduction in interest rates, moratorium from repayment of principal and interest,
waiver on payment of royalty & licence fees by concessionaires, and waiver of fixed energy charges, he
expressed hope that these would help in overcoming the problems plaguing the sector.
On the measures announced by the government Agarwal said, “through different Ministries and the RBI,
the government has been prompt in introducing measures time and again to boost the economy, and to
ensure the industry is running with minimal impact.”
The 250,000 tonnes of sales are expected to be deferred until later in the year. There is now no sales
forecast for June.
Stanmore anticipates its unit costs per tonne to increase accordingly, from $107 per tonne sold (ex-royalty)
to $109 per tonne.
The company adjusted its underlying earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation
(EBITDA) guidance from $92–$100 million to $80–$85 million for the current financial year.
Stanmore is also faced with a significant fall in coking coal prices, with Platts premium low-volatile (PLV)
hard coking coal prices falling from $US163.5 ($251.2) per tonne in mid-March to $US118.5 per tonne
as at April 24.
“Although this recent fall in prices is significant, it will not impact 2020 financial year underlying
EBITDA materially, given the company sells largely on contract prices which are 50 per cent set for the
June quarter,” Stanmore stated in an ASX announcement.
Stanmore’s production guidance remains on track at 2.35 million tonnes. The company operates the Isaac
Plains complex in the Moranbah town of Queensland, which generates coking coal and thermal coal.
Earlier this month, Singapore-based Golden Investments made a takover offer for all of the shares in
Stanmore that it did not already own or control.
Days later Golden Investments acquired more than 50 million Stanmore shares, giving the former a 51
per cent interest in the company.
Stanmore previously stated that the takeover offer represented a “compelling opportunity,” given the
declining prices of Stanmore’s shares since July last year and the potential impact of coronavirus
pandemic on global economies.
Climate Change was a major concern, with 70 per cent of those polled saying they were concerned about
climate change in Queensland.
“These results show that Queenslanders are concerned about the threat of climate change and support
more government investment in clean energy solutions. The Government should listen to these concerns
and pave the way for more renewable energy jobs and investment,” said Ellen Roberts, Solar Citizens’
National Director.
These polling results come as state and federal politicians debate the need and viability of a new coal-
fired power station in North Queensland.
The Federal Government has provided $4 million for a feasibility study into a new coal-fired power station
in Collinsville, despite the Queensland Energy Minister, Anthony Lynham, expressing deep concern over
the project.
“Building a new coal-fired power station in Queensland would require extensive government subsidies
and it’s clear that the majority of Queenslanders don’t support the idea,” Ms Roberts said.
“Queensland Opposition Leader, Deb Frecklington, is staying silent on the issue, but 65 per cent of LNP
voters polled said they support spending on renewable energy ahead of coal-fired power.”
Further results showed that 22 per cent of people surveyed were unsure who they’d vote for when
Queensland heads to the polls in October. A majority of those who were unsure of their voting intention
rated a negative association with coal-fired power and coal mining.
“Queenslanders clearly support more investment in clean energy projects and if governments take action
now it will boost the struggling economy,” said Ms Roberts.
“Renewables can unlock the energy trifecta for Queenslanders: lower bills, less pollution and more
regional employment.
“We can utilise our impressive solar and wind resources to produce an abundance of cheap electricity and
help revive Australian manufacturing.”
The government of president Cyril Ramaphosa – who is consulting the country over which activities
should resume when South Africa’s lockdown eases from level 5 to 4 on 1 May – should consider
renewables’ contribution to electricity supply and economic recovery, the associations said.
In their missive, the organisations argued the green energy sector is already “accustomed to operating in
a controlled environment” and has enacted “strict health [and] safety protocols”. Any additional
requirements can be “easily accommodated” if construction resumes, the letter said.
To bolster their case, SAPVIA and the other associations pointed at the 2.23GW large-scale enewable
pipeline they said currently lies under construction. According to their records (see table below), solar
accounts for a 800MW-plus share of that total.
There is also, the letter said, the separate 800MW pipeline of embedded generation projects to consider.
These privately-owned facilities “provide mitigation to the high risk of load shedding as the economy
reopens,” the associations claimed.
South Africa’s plans for a phased reopening of its economy in May follow the roll-out of strict lockdown
measures on 27 March. The quarantine has paralysed the work of solar EPCs – Spain’s Gransolar included
– and brought delays to the processing of IPP project applications.
In South Africa, the COVID-19 pandemic comes after bumpy years for its REIPPP renewables
procurement programme, launched in 2011. In early 2019, the government said it was mulling the
renegotiation of existing PPAs to ease the financial burdens of offtaker and state-run utility Eskom.
Renewable players – who have faced off a REIPPPP legal challenge from coal truckers – hailed last
October the government’s allocation of a new 6GW of solar, coupled the following month by plans for
three new ”fast-tracking” renewable energy zones.
The European Commission tackled this pervading sense of uncertainty in its roadmap towards lifting
coronavirus containment measures that was published on 15 April 2020. The Committee for European
Construction Equipment (CECE) was keen to share this with its members this week, pointing out how the
European Union (EU) plans to lift border controls and re-start economic activity.
The plan is to ease travel restrictions between border regions for cross-border and seasonal workers, and
then between European areas with low coronavirus infection rates. External borders can later be reopened
with access by non-EU residents to the EU scheduled for a second stage. To re-start economic activity the
EU recommends, again, a phased approach focusing on sectors that are ‘essential’ to facilitate economic
activity such as transport. The commission says it will also create a rapid alert function to identify supply
and value chain disruptions, relying on existing networks such as Enterprise Europe Network (EEN),
clusters, chambers of commerce and trade associations, small and medium enterprise (SME) envoys and
more. Whether the EU can actually coordinate a return to normality following its poor response in aiding
Italy at the start of the European outbreak of coronavirus remains to be seen. Yet, its historical roots as an
economic community dating back to the Treaty of Rome in 1957 suggests it may be more successful when
coordinating technical aspects of trade.
Detailed above are the views and plans of just one supplier and one continental organisation, although
they are both prominent. The takeaway from this is that uncertainty is a major problem so far for the
cement industry in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak. Companies have faced a cash crunch in the short
term as economies slowed down and they are reluctant to release cash until the future becomes clearer.
Large parts of the cement industry and its suppliers are very international, which exposes it to even more
uncertainty. Different countries enforcing different restrictions and different easing strategies at different
times create a major headache for everyone and a block to investment. Making cement is undeniably an
essential industry and this realisation by legislators can be seen in some countries that at first shut down
their plants before understanding that they needed them open after all! Suppliers should benefit from this
too, although at reduced activity levels. We don’t know what kind of recovery will come – hopefully one
releasing plenty of pent up demand. Yet one thing is certain. The work of the regional cement associations
and those representing suppliers is going to be crucial in the coming months.
******