0% found this document useful (0 votes)
840 views13 pages

Introduction FreeSpanningPipelinesDNV RP F105

This document provides an introduction to DNV-RP-F105, which provides guidelines for assessing the fatigue safety of free-spanning pipelines. It summarizes the historical development of standards and models for vortex-induced vibration, including key research projects. The recommendation presents a multidisciplinary approach to free span assessment, covering environmental conditions, loading mechanisms, structural response, and acceptance criteria. It aims to make the guidelines more user-friendly and aligned with state-of-the-art methods through inclusion of recent research findings. Failure modes addressed include fatigue limit state due to vortex-induced vibration and wave loads, as well as ultimate limit state due to over-stress. A calculation tool is introduced to facilitate application of the complex design

Uploaded by

Nabil37
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
840 views13 pages

Introduction FreeSpanningPipelinesDNV RP F105

This document provides an introduction to DNV-RP-F105, which provides guidelines for assessing the fatigue safety of free-spanning pipelines. It summarizes the historical development of standards and models for vortex-induced vibration, including key research projects. The recommendation presents a multidisciplinary approach to free span assessment, covering environmental conditions, loading mechanisms, structural response, and acceptance criteria. It aims to make the guidelines more user-friendly and aligned with state-of-the-art methods through inclusion of recent research findings. Failure modes addressed include fatigue limit state due to vortex-induced vibration and wave loads, as well as ultimate limit state due to over-stress. A calculation tool is introduced to facilitate application of the complex design

Uploaded by

Nabil37
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

introduction to

DNV-RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines

Introduction

presented by

Olav Fyrileiv
Principal Engineer
Det Norske Veritas
Slide 1 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
Historical Perspective - VIV

• Maximum allowable span length


Implicitly assumes natural frequency f0 controlled by free span length.
Do not account for free span scenario, loading phenomenon or environment
70ties • Fatigue Criteria for In-line
True ULS accounting for stress amplitude and number of cycles (η=0.1)
Arbitrary models and SN-curves applied. Effect of waves?

80ties • Onset criteria for Cross-flow


Cross-flow VIV not allowed. OK for “short” spans and current conditions
Do not account for stress ranges and time to failure if exceeded.
1998 • Fatigue Criteria for Cross-flow
True FLS accounting for stress amplitude and number of cycles
Provides robust decision criteria.
Other failure modes may be governing (in-line fatigue, over-stress)
Slide 2 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
Historical Perspective - VIV

1998 • DNV Guideline (GL14)


‘Free Spanning Pipelines

Updated and released as

2002 • DNV Recommended Practice (RP-F105)


‘Free Spanning Pipelines’

Slide 3 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK


Free Span Assessment -
Multidiscipline

• Environmental conditions
– Flow conditions from combined wave and current
– Local topography
• Loading Mechanism
– Vortex Induced Vibration (in-line & cross-flow)
– Direct wave loads & Proximity Effects
• Structural Response
– Soil-pipe interaction
– Non-linearities (geometrical, static/dynamic properties)
• Acceptance criteria
– SN-approach (weld, defects, …)

Slide 4 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK


Basis for GL14/DNV-RP-F105
VIV Models based on experience • Allows for state-of-the-art fatigue
from R&D projects & pipeline design analyses
• Links in-line VIV and wave loads
• MULTISPAN Project (1994-1996) • Allows cross-flow vibrations
– Response Model for In-line VIV • Safety philosophy in compliance
– On-set criteria for cross-flow with DNV-OS-F101
– Reliability based calibration • Introduces consistent link between
• GUDESP PROJECT (1989-1994) analysis models and safety
– Cross-flow Response model factor(s)
– Effect of Waves
• Research projects • Applied in numerous projects in
– SVS full scale test – North Sea
– MASPUS lab test – Persian Gulf
• DHI/Statoil study – South East Asia
– GOM
Slide 5 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
DNV GL 14 Æ DNV-RP-F105 - why update?
• Include experience feed-back from projects
• Include recent R&D effort:
– Pipe in trench
– VIV response model updates
– Hydrodynamical coefficients
– Structural response estimates
– Soil stiffness
– Force model (frequency domain)
– Recommended SN curves
• Make it more user-friendly:
– screening (on-set) criterion
– make criteria and calculation methods more complete
– restructure document
Slide 6 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
Failure Modes

Fatigue Limit State Ultimate Limit State


.. accumulated damage from .. over-stress (local buckling)
stress cycles caused by: due to:

• Vortex Induced Vibrations


(in-line & cross-flow) (RP-F105) • Static Bending (weight &
current) (DNV OS-F101)
• Direct Wave Loads (RP-F105)
• VIV & Wave Loads (RP-F105)
• Pressure Effects (DNV OS-F101)
• Axial Force (DNV OS-F101)

• Trawl interference (GL 13)

Slide 7 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK


Calculation Tool

• Free span assessment complex


• Require detailed knowledge in several disciplines:
– hydrodynamics, VIV and load models
– environmental conditions, long-term statistics
– fatigue calculations
– structural response incl. geotechnical aspects
• DNV-RP-F105 still complex (and difficult?) to use
• Need for a calculation tool to:
– make it easier to apply the RP
– enable a cost-efficient span assessment

Slide 8 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK


Slide 9 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
LEVEL 1 SPANS OPTIONS 2002-06-10 Program by:

LEVEL 2 SPANS USER HELP


FATFREE Current Vers. 9.0 Kim Mørk (Kim.Mork@dnv.com )
FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF FREE SPANNING PIPELINES Olav Fyrileiv (Olav.Fyrileiv@dnv.com)
LEVEL 3 SPANS PRINT RESULTS DNV version Expiry date: 2002-12-31 Release Note Deep Water Technology
FATFREE COMPLETED Project: Date: 2002-06-10 Calculations by
No Wave Case References: Verified by
Calculation Options
Analysis Level 3
Current Modelling
Uc Histogram Flat sea-bed
FatFree Main Sheet
Free Span Scenario Response Data
User Defined User Defined
Damping SN-Curves
F2 (CN 30.4)
Safety Factors
NORMAL
Code Wave Modelling h [m] 200 fo(in-line) 0.722 ζstruc 0.000 m1 3 η 0.50
RP-F105 L [m] 50 fo(cr-flow) 2.000 ζsoil (in-line) 0.000 m2 3 γk 1.30
Return Period Values Directionality e [m] 3.00 Ain (in-line) 186 ζsoil (cr-flow) 0.000 Log(C1) 11.630 γf 1.20
Automatic Generated Discrete - C dir. d [m] 0 Acr (cr-flow) 186 ζh,RM 0.000 Log(C2) 11.630 γS 1.05
UPDATE S HEET Environmental Data θpipe 0.0 λmax 484 logNsw 8.00 γon 1.10
Wave-template D [m] 0.500 δ/D 1.52 KS(in-line) 0.00 S0 [MPa] 0.00
CALCULATE Current L/D 100 Seff/PE 0.13 KS(cr-flow) 0.00 SCF 1.00
Leff,vs/L Soil stiffness ΨR 1.00
Leff,v/L Sand - Medium
KV 1.907E+07 Well Defined Span
KL 1.430E+07
KV,S 5.300E+05
FATIGUE LIFE cross-flow direction DYNAMIC STRESS [MPa] in-line direction EXTREME CONDITIONS
In-line (Response Model) 2.10E+00 yrs Peak Stress V. Mises Stress Peak Stress V. Mises Stress Current Waves
In-line (Force Model) - yrs σx(1 year) 0.0 319.8 σx(1 year) 22.0 113.7 UC(1 year) 0.76 US(1 year) 0.00
In-line (Combined) - yrs σx(10 year) 0.0 319.8 σx(10 year) 22.0 113.7 UC(10 year) 0.76 US(10 year) 0.00
Cross-Flow 8.33E+05 yrs σx(100 year) 0.0 319.8 σx(100 year) 22.0 113.7 UC(100 year) 0.76 US(100 year) 0.00
Damage distribution vs direction pdf for omnidirectional current
RM (In-Line)
FM (In-Line) RM(cross-flow)*4
Cross-Flow RM(inline)*10
Comb.(In-Line)

θ
velocity
0 20 40 60 80 100 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00

STRUCTURAL MODELLING
2 3
Static Stress [MPa] Transfer values Areas [m ] Functional Loads Pipe Dimensions [m] Constants Densities [kg/m ]
σh 48.0 EIsteel 1.80E+08 Αi 0.16619 Heff [N] 0.00E+00 Ds 0.5000 ν 0.30 ρsteel 7850
σN 6.8 me 472 Αsteel 0.03016 p [bar] 60 tsteel 0.0200 α [oC-1] 1.17E-05 ρconcrete 0
σM,cr 299.9 q 670 Αcoating 0.00000 ∆T [oC] 0 tconcrete 0.0000 E [N/m2] 2.07E+11 ρcoating 0
σM,in (100y) 66.6 Seff -3.99E+05 Αconcrete 0.00000 Coating data tcoating 0.0000 CD(current) 1.00 ρcont 200
Slide 10 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
Ca 1.00 Ae 0.19635 kc 0.00 ρwater 1027
CSF 0.00 fcn (MPa) 45
ρs/ρ 1.34
Experience with DNV-RP-F105
• Slight relaxation compared to Guideline 14.
• Pipe-in-trench effect significant, relevant for free spans due to
scouring.
• Effect of thick concrete coating significant.
• Updated boundary condition coefficients provides good
estimates for the structural response of single free spans.
• DNV-RP-F105 allows significantly longer spans than older
codes.

DNV-RP-F105 represents state-of-art in free span design


and minimise the costs related to seabed correction and
span intervention work.
Slide 11 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK
API RP 1111 (1999)

DNV GL14Æ Updated and released as DNV-RP-F105


Slide 12 2/9/2005 DNV RP-F105 Free Spanning Pipelines MANAGING RISK

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy