Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 93 views

    Course Outline in Special Civil Actions

    Uploaded by

    luigi vida
    This document outlines various civil procedure rules that will be covered in a special civil actions course for the 2019-2020 academic year. It lists relevant case law references for rules on interpleader, declaratory relief, review of COMELEC and COA decisions, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, expropriation, foreclosure of real estate mortgages, and partition. The document provides an outline of topics and associated legal precedents that will guide discussion of special civil actions under the Rules of Court.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Course Outline in Special Civil Actions

    Uploaded by

    luigi vida
    93 views5 pages
    This document outlines various civil procedure rules that will be covered in a special civil actions course for the 2019-2020 academic year. It lists relevant case law references for rules on interpleader, declaratory relief, review of COMELEC and COA decisions, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, expropriation, foreclosure of real estate mortgages, and partition. The document provides an outline of topics and associated legal precedents that will guide discussion of special civil actions under the Rules of Court.

    Original Title

    course outline in special civil actions

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines various civil procedure rules that will be covered in a special civil actions course for the 2019-2020 academic year. It lists relevant case law references for rules on interpleader, declaratory relief, review of COMELEC and COA decisions, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, expropriation, foreclosure of real estate mortgages, and partition. The document provides an outline of topics and associated legal precedents that will guide discussion of special civil actions under the Rules of Court.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    93 views5 pages

    Course Outline in Special Civil Actions

    Uploaded by

    luigi vida
    This document outlines various civil procedure rules that will be covered in a special civil actions course for the 2019-2020 academic year. It lists relevant case law references for rules on interpleader, declaratory relief, review of COMELEC and COA decisions, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, expropriation, foreclosure of real estate mortgages, and partition. The document provides an outline of topics and associated legal precedents that will guide discussion of special civil actions under the Rules of Court.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    Course Outline

    Special Civil Action


    AY 2019-2020

    Rule 62
    Interpleader

    1. Wack Wack Golf & Country Club, Inc. vs. Won 70 SCRA 165, 169 (1976)
    2. Alvarez vs. Commonwealth of the Philippines 65 Phil 302 (1938)
    3. Beltran vs. People’s Homesite & Housing Corp. 29 SCRA 145 (1969)
    4. Lim vs. Continental Development Corp. 69 SCRA 349 (1976)
    5. Sy-Quia vs. Sheriff of Ilocos Sur and De Leon 46 Phil 400 (1924)
    6. Mesina vs. Intermediate Appellate Court 145 SCRA 497 (1986)
    7. Ocampo vs Tirona GR No. 147812, April 6, 2005
    8. RCBC vs. Metro GR No. 127913, Sept. 13, 2001

    Rule 63
    Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies

    1. Mirando vs. Wellington Ty & Bros. 81 SCRA 506 (1978)


    2. Delumen et al. vs. Republic of the Philippines 94 Phil 287, 289 (1954)
    3. Tolentino vs. Board of Accountancy et al. 90 Phil 83, 87, 88 (1951)
    4. Edades vs. Edades et al. 99 Phil 675 (1956)
    5. Tanda vs. Aldaya 98 Phil 244 (1956)
    6. De Borja vs. Villadolid 85 Phil 36 (1949)
    7. Araneta et al. vs. Hon. M. Gatmaitan et al. 101 Phil 328 (1957)
    8. Mejia vs. Gabayan GR No. 149765, April 12, 2005
    9. Salvacion vs. Central Bank 278 SCRA 27 (1997)
    10. Allied Broadcasting Center, Inc. vs. Republic 190 SCRA 782 (1990)
    11. Tambunting, Jr. vs. Sumabat 470 SCRA 92

    Rule 64
    Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the Commission on
    Elections and the Commission on Audit

    1. Aratuc vs. COMELEC 88 SCRA 251 (1979)


    2. Dario vs. Mison 176 SCRA 84 (1988)
    3. Garcia vs. Court of Appeals 259 SCRA 99 (1996)
    4. ABS-CBN vs. COMELEC 360 Phil 780
    5. Repol vs. COMELEC 428 SCRA 321
    6. Ambil, Jr. vs. COMELEC 344 SCRA 358 (2000)
    7. Bulilan vs. COA GR No. 130057, December 22, 1998
    8. Lokin vs. COMELEC GR No. 193808, June 26, 2012
    9. Reyna vs. COA 642 SCRA 210
    Rule 65
    Certiorari

    1. Meralco Securities Industrial Corp. vs.


    Central Board Assessment Appeals 114 SCRA 260 (1982)
    2. Nunal vs. Commission on Audit 169 SCRA 356 (1989)
    3. Tuason vs. Register of Deeds, Caloocan City 157 SCRA 613 (1988)
    4. Gold City Integrated Port Services, Inc. (INPORT) vs.
    Intermediate Appellate Court 171 SCRA 579 (1989)
    5. St. Peter Memorial Park, Inc. vs. Campos Jr. 63 SCRA 180 (1975)
    6. Valencia vs. Court of Appeals 184 SCRA 561, 567-568 (1990)
    7. National Electrification Administration vs. CA 126 SCRA 394 (1983)
    8. Uy Liao Eng vs. Nixon Lee GR No. 176831, January 15, 2010
    9. Romy’s Freight Service vs. Castro 490 SCRA 165 (2006)
    10. DBP vs. Pingol GR No. 145908, January 22, 2004
    11. Juliano-Llave vs. Republic 646 SCRA 637
    12. Tang vs. Subic Bay Distribution GR No. 162575, December 15, 2010

    Prohibition

    1. Matuguina Integrated Wood Products, Inc. vs. CA 263 SCRA 490 (1996)
    2. Morfe vs. Justice of the Peace of Caloocan 67 Phil 696-700 (1939)
    3. Vergara vs. Rugue 78 SCRA 312 (1977)
    4. Nacionalista Party vs. Bautista 85 Phil 101 (1949)
    5. Enriquez vs. Macadaeg 84 Phil 674 (1949)
    6. Asinas vs. Court of First Instance of Romblon
    and Asinas 51 Phil 665 (1928)
    7. Holy Spirit Homeowner’s Association vs
    Defensor GR No. 163980, August 3, 2006
    8. Versoza vs. Martinez 299 SCRA 100 (1998)
    9. Galicto vs. Aquino III 667 SCRA 150
    10. De Castro vs. JBC et. al. GR No. 191002, March 17, 2010
    11. Cutaran vs. DENR 350 SCRA 697 (2001)

    Mandamus

    1. Angchangco, Jr. vs. Ombudsman 268 SCRA 301 (1997)


    2. Kapisanan ng mga Mangagagawa sa Railroad
    Company Credit Union, Inc. vs. Manila Railroad Co. 88 SCRA 616 (1949)
    3. Carbungco vs. Amparo 83 Phil 638 (1949)
    4. University of San Carlos vs. CA 166 SCRA 570 (1988)
    5. Madrigal vs. Lecaroz 191 SCRA 20 (1990)
    6. University of the East vs. City of Manila and Aquino 96 Phil 316 (1954)
    7. Henares, Jr. vs. LTFRB GR No. 158290, Oct. 23, 2006
    8. Remando vs. Naguillan Emission Testing Center 677 SCRA 343
    9. Pacheco vs. CA GR No. 124863, June 19, 2000
    10. Antiquera vs. Baluyot GR No. L-3318, May 5, 1952

    Rule 66
    Quo Warranto

    1. Potot vs. Bagno 82 Phil 679 (1949)


    2. Abaya vs. Alvear 82 Phil 103 (1948)
    3. Teves vs. Sindiong 81 Phil 658 (1948)
    4. Serafin vs. Cruz 58 Phil 611 (1933)
    5. Lacson vs. Romero et al. 84 Phil 740 (1949)
    6. Acosta vs. Flor 5 Phil 18 (1905)
    7. Garcia vs. Perez 99 SCRA 328 (1980)
    8. Cruz vs. Ramos 84 Phil 226 (1949)
    9. Calleja vs. Panday GR No. 168696 Feb 28, 2006
    10. Feliciano vs. Villasin GR No. 174929, June 27, 2008
    11. Divinagracia vs. Consolidated Broadcasting System GR No. 162272, April 7, 2009
    12. Sison vs. Pangramuyen 84 SCRA 364
    13. Cristobal vs. Melchor 78 SCRA 175

    Rule 67
    Expropriation

    1. Barangay San Roque vs. Heirs of Pastor GR No. 138896, June 20, 2000
    2. NAPOCOR vs. Jocson 26 SCRA 520 (1992)
    3. City of Manila vs. Arellano Law Colleges 85 Phil 663 (1950)
    4. Visayan Refining Co. vs. Camus and Paredes 40 Phil 550 (1919)
    5. Municipality of Binan vs. Garcia 180 SCRA 576 (1989)
    6. Provincial Government of Rizal vs. Caro de Araullo 58 Phil 308 (1933)
    7. Republic vs. Vda de Castellvi 58 SCRA 336 (1974)
    8. Export Processing Zone Authority vs. Dulay 149 SCRA 305 (1987)
    9. City of Manila vs. Corrales 32 Phil 85 (1915)
    10. Benguet Consolidated, Inc. vs. Republic 143 SCRA 466 (1986)
    11. Lagcao vs. Labra 440 SCRA 279
    12. Hacienda Luisita, Inc. vs. PARC 670 SCRA 392
    13. LBP vs. Heirs Salvador Encinas 670 SCRA 52
    14. Yujuico vs. Atienza, Jr. 472 SCRA 463

    Rule 68
    Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage

    1. Seno vs. PEstolante and Barimbao 103 Phil 414 (1958)


    2. The Good Development Corp. vs. Tutaan 73 SCRA 189 (1976)
    3. Limpin vs. Intermediate Appellate Court 166 SCRA 26 (1970)
    4. Quimson vs. PNB 36 SCRA 26 (1970)
    5. Ramos vs. Mañalac and Lopez 89 Phil 270 (1951)
    6. Grimalt vs. Velasquez and Sy Quio 36 Phil 936 (1917)
    7. Sy vs. CA 172 SCRA 125 (1989)
    8. Tolentino vs. CA 106 SCRA 513 (1981)
    9. Ponce de Leon vs. Rehabilitation Finance Corp. 36 SCRA 289 (1970)
    10. Sps. Arquiza vs. CA GR No. 160479 June 8, 2005
    11. United Overseas Bank Phils. (formerly Westmont Bank)
    vs. Rosemoore Mining & Development Corp. GR No. 159699 & 163521
    March 12, 2007
    12. Samson vs. Rivera 428 SCRA 759
    13. Sps. Rosales vs. Sps. Alfonso GR No. 137792, August 12, 2003

    Rule 69
    Partition

    1. Russel vs. Vestil 304 SCRA 738 (1999)


    2. Ruguian et al. vs. Ruguian 9 Phil 527 (1908)
    3. Miranda vs. CA 71 SCRA 295 (1976)
    4. Municipality of Biñan vs. Garcia 180 SCRA 576 (1989)
    5. Notarte vs. Notarte 679 SCRA 378
    6. Lacbayan vs. Samoy 645 SCRA 677
    7. Heirs of Restar vs. Heirs of Cichon 475 SCRA 731
    8. Sepulveda vs. Pelaez GR No. 152195, January 31, 2005
    9. Gochan and Sons Realty Corp vs. Cañada 165 SCRA 207

    Rule 70
    Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

    1. Quinagoran vs. CA GR No. 155179 August 24, 2007


    2. Hilario vs. CA 260 SCRA 420 (1996)
    3. Reyes vs. Sta. Maria 91 SCRA 164 (1979)
    4. Consing vs. Jamandre 64 SCRA 1 (1975)
    5. Maninang vs. CA 314 SCRA 525 (1999)
    6. Arevalo Gomez Corp. vs. Lao Hian Liong 148 SCRA 372 (1987)
    7. Mara, Inc. vs. Estrella 65 SCRA 471 (1975)
    8. Cañiza vs. CA 286 SCRA 437 (1998)
    9. De Laureano vs. Adil 72 SCRA 148, 157 (1976)
    10. Valdez vs. CA GR No. 132424 May 2, 2006
    11. Encarnacion vs. Armigo GR No. 169793 September 15, 2006
    12. Dela Cruz vs. CA GR No. 139442, December 6, 2006
    13. Wilmon Auto Supply vs. CA 208 SCRA 108
    14. Arquelada vs. Philippine Veterans Bank GR No. 139137, March 31, 2000

    Rule 71
    Contempt

    1. Halili vs. Court of Industrial Relations 136 SCRA 112 (1985);


    140 SCRA 73 (1985)
    2. Slade Perkins vs. Director of Prisons 58 Phil 271 (1933)
    3. Lim Se vs. Argel 70 SCRA 378 (1976)
    4. Ang vs. Castro 136 SCRA 453, 458 (1985)
    5. In Re: Kelly 35 Phil 944, 950-951 (1916)
    6. In Re: Lozano and Quevedo 54 Phil 801, 805 (1930)
    7. People vs. Godoy 243 SCRA 64, 95 (1995)
    8. In Re: Sotto 82 Phil 595 (1949)
    9. Macrohon vs. Ibay November 30, 2006
    10. Regalado vs. Go GR No. 167988 February 6, 2007
    11. Judge Dolores Español vs. Atty. Formoso GR No. 150949, June 21, 2007
    12. SK Realty, Inc. vs. Uy 431 SCRA 239
    13. Encinas vs. National Bookstore GR No. 162704, July 28, 2005
    14. Re: Letter dated February 21, 2005
    of Atty. Noel Sorreda AM No. 05-3-04-SC, July 22,
    2005
    15. Robosa vs. NLRC GR No. 176085, February 8, 2012
    16. LBP vs. Listana 408 SCRA 328

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy