Counselling Psychology in Medical Settings: The Promising Role of Counselling Health Psychology
Counselling Psychology in Medical Settings: The Promising Role of Counselling Health Psychology
Counselling Psychology in Medical Settings: The Promising Role of Counselling Health Psychology
Evangelos C. Karademas
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Greece
Evangelos C. Karademas,
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, 74100, Gallos, Rethymnon, Greece.
Abstract
During the second half of the 20 th century the field of human health and health
care was faced with significant changes and new challenges. Gentry (1984)
highlighted several aspects of this new environment in health and health care, such
as the failure of the biomedical model to fully explain health and illness, the shift to
chronic diseases as the main health problem, the realization of the role of
psychological and life-style factors in the manifestation and maintenance of health
problems, the development of sophisticated psychological theories about health.
These factors facilitated the formation of relatively new initiatives within the field of
psychological science, while new specialties and professional categories emerged.
During the ‟70s and ‟80s certain major national and international associations were
established with the aim to promote „behavioural medicine‟ or „health psychology‟,
whereas new relevant scientific journals were published (for a more detailed review,
Belar & Deardorff, 1995; Kaptein & Weinman, 2004). As a result, in the following
decades a new understanding of health and illness appeared, psychological research
on health and health related factors increased, and health problems, especially
chronic diseases, stopped being just a physician‟s job. Patients were increasingly
referred to psychologists for treatment and symptom management, while
psychologists were involved in the efforts for health maintenance and health
promotion in almost every population (e.g., Ayers et al., 2007; Bennett, 2000;
Sarafino, 1999). Thus, the role of health, clinical and counselling psychologists in
health care gradually became more important.
The purpose of the present article is to briefly present the multiple roles of
counselling psychologists in health and health care, discuss relevant training
demands, argue about ethical issues, as well as about the opportunities and
difficulties of working in medical settings. Of course the whole issue is vast.
Therefore, the present document intends to be only a brief discussion of issues
related to counselling health psychology.
counselling psychology in health care have been developed. For instance, within the
Society of Counselling Psychology of the American Psychological Association
(Division 17) a section of Counselling Health Psychology has been established. This
section is dedicated to the science and practice of counselling psychology in health-
related contexts through research, intervention, training of young students or
professionals, and development of health policy initiatives (for more information,
http://www.div17.org/sections_chp.html). Also, the Division of Counselling
Psychology of the British Psychological Society acknowledges the breadth of places
that a counselling psychologist may work, including medical settings (for more
information, http://www.bps.org.uk/dcop/). Indeed, the role of counselling
psychologists in such settings is fast growing.
Rutter & Quine, 2002). An interesting tool, which provides guidelines for the
development of intervention programmes, for the application of theory, as
well as for the transformation of theory into practice and the selection of
appropriate methods and strategies, is the Intervention Mapping (see, Kok &
Schaalma, 2004). Intervention Mapping may be really useful for practitioners,
especially at the beginning of their career.
In any case, psychologists must be cautious when selecting a strategy, as
they have to take into consideration issues like the effectiveness of each
strategy, possible interference with the physical functioning and possible
side-effects of the medical treatment, the cost/ effectiveness ratio, time limits
and so on. Counselling health psychologists should also follow all necessary
steps to secure an evidence-based practice, which is the best way to promote
patients‟ well-being (Spring, 2007; Walker & London, 2007).
Additionally, in recent years, the intervention role of counselling
psychologists is expanding to new fields, including genetic testing and
related counselling services (Wang, Gonzalez, & Merajver, 2004), telehealth
counselling services (Miller, 2006), and spiritual issues and health (Thoresen,
1999). As our understanding of the role of psychosocial and behavioural
factors in health deepens, more and more efficient intervention programs are
developed in favour of the patients and the health care system. The
implementation of these programs, however, requires for highly trained and
capable experts, an issue that I will refer to later on.
Gatchel and Oordt (2003) underlined the fact that the approaches for providing
psychological services fall on a continuum, depending on the characteristics of each
health service. According to the authors, within this continuous lie four major
models. These models were described in relation to primary health care, but I think
we can easily adopt them in relation to any health care setting. In the “collocated
clinics” model, the psychologist is usually with a traditional psychological clinic and
not integrated into the health care clinic. Actually, medical and psychological (or
psychiatric) clinics remain two different entities. In the second model, the
psychologist may act as a provider within the medical clinic. Accordingly, he/she
may provide counselling or therapy for both mental health and medical conditions.
The psychologist collaborates with the medical personnel, although he/she is still an
„independent provider‟ of health care. This model resembles the first one, but in this
case the psychological work is offered as part of the same clinic. In the third model,
the psychologist acts as a “behavioural health consultant”. She/he is a member of a
multidisciplinary team and responsible for the behavioural and psychological
aspects of treatment. The psychologist evaluates the patient and makes
recommendations to the case manager (the physician). She/he may see the patient
for a limited number of sessions (one or two) to monitor the implementation of the
recommendations or provide specific advice. In parallel, the psychologist can
provide targeted services to specific groups of patients (e.g., stress management to
heart attack patients). In case of more intense problems the psychologist may refer
the patient to other specialized psychological services. The final model refers to the
psychologist as the “staff adviser”, who consults only the medical staff. She/he has
no independent contact with the patients, but rather uses her or his expertise to assist
the medical staff with defining and treating the problem.
Each of the models presented by Gatchel and Oordt (2003) has advantages and
disadvantages and may be appropriate for one setting, but not for another. It lies
with the setting and the scientific staff to decide upon which model better fits their
needs. Of course, the models presented are not mutually exclusive (Gatchel & Oordt,
2003). A combination of these might be the most efficient and proper solution.
Likewise, Pruitt, Klapow, Epping-Jordon and Dresselhaus (1998) proposed a
stepped-care approach: the psychologist initially provides advice to the medical staff
in order to deal with a patient. Should no improvement occurs, the psychologist may
be engaged in a personal contact with the patient in order to make a more thorough
assessment and provide the appropriate treatment. If also no improvement is
achieved, then the psychologist may decide to provide a more extensive therapy or
refer the patient to another service.
I believe that counselling psychologists working within a medical setting should
(a) originally evaluate current conditions in the setting, (b) assess the needs of the
typical patients of that setting, as well as (c) of the medical personnel, (d) collaborate
with the other members of the scientific staff, and then (e) determine and finally
adopt the most appropriate model that will permit them to perform the necessary
diagnostic, intervention, consulting, training and research work.
At this point, I should emphasize the fact that especially in United Kingdom a
fast growing number of counsellors work in primary care and general practice. As
Foster (2000) reports, from almost no primary care counselling provision in 1980,
there were counsellors in 51% of the surgeries in England and Wales at the time “the
new National Health System” was launched. This expansion of counselling services
was rapid but, according to many, haphazard and fragmentary (Eatock, 2000; Melloc-
Clark, 2000). Still, the numbers of counsellors and counselling psychologists in
general practice are growing and the National Health System is probably the major
employer of counsellors in UK (Eatock, 2000). However, their work is primarily
focused on mental health issues. Although mental health is of great importance for
all medical patients and their survival and quality of life, working as a mental health
professional is different than serving as a „counselling health psychologist‟. For
instance, a mental health professional focuses on psychosocial issues and their
association with health. On the other hand, a „counselling health psychologist‟
focuses not only to mental health issues, but also on many more topics related to
physical health (e.g., adherence, physical symptoms management, life-style etc), even
when no mental health difficulty is present. It is my opinion that counselling
psychologists working within primary care in UK could also assume the role of a
„counselling health psychologist‟ with success and expand their responsibilities
within the health care system. After all, there is evidence suggesting that their
services are effective and the help they offer substantial (Baker, Allen, Gibson,
Newth, & Baker, 1998; Bower, Rowland, & Hardy, 2003), while their contribution to
the development of primary care is more than significant (e.g., Lenihan & Iliffe,
2000).
Ethical issues
Despite the opportunities that health care provides, and the significant
contribution that counselling psychology can make, only a relatively small number of
counselling psychologists seem to work in such services, while not many programs
provide systematic training for such a possibility. In fact, until early ‟90s only a small
percentage of counselling psychologists were working in the health domain (Good,
1992), despite the growing employment opportunities (see for example,
http://www.health-psychology.org.uk./menuItems/what_is_health_psychology.php).
Altmaier in 1984 reported that almost 60% of the counselling psychology training
programs in the USA had no health psychology course work, whereas more than half
reported practicum placements in health psychology. Furthermore, students
reported a moderate interest in the area. More recently, however, the interest in
health psychology practice appears to be increased, but not much. Neimeyer,
Bowman and Stewart (2001) reported data from 1989 to 1998 indicating that about
17% of graduates of counselling psychology programs in the US have been employed
in hospitals, whereas more than 80% were still placed in counselling and mental
health centres, in private practice, and in academia. In the same line, Stedman, Hatch,
Keilin, & Schoenfeld (2005) in their description of internship training of clinical and
counselling psychologists concluded that training still focus heavily on the
traditional clinical-provider role, while there is little evidence of innovation towards
new areas of research and practice (like health settings). In the United Kingdom, only
4% of the applied psychologists work with clients suffering from physical health
problems, according to recent surveys (BPS, 2007). On the other hand, about 40% of
the chartered counselling psychologists in England are employed at the National
Health System (BPS, 2005). Obviously, they work with mental health-related
problems. It is possible that the disadvantages of working in a physical health care
setting (i.e., coming to terms with the medical hierarchy, maintaining confidentiality,
as well as the difficulties in communicating with the medical personnel (Good, 1992)
are keeping young counselling psychologists from practicing their profession in such
settings, despite the existing advantages (e.g., the diversity of the roles a counselling
psychologist could assume). Moreover, the traditional focus of counselling
psychology and relevant training programs on the more typical mental difficulties
and psychosocial troubles, which usually does not include chronic diseases and
physical health, might be another significant reason for this trend.
Indeed, working within a medical setting might be really demanding and
complex. I will use the primary care services as an example. Primary care is defined
as the very first care provided to the patients when they enter the health care system
(Bray, 1996). As Gatchel and Oordt (2003) pointed out, psychologists working in such
settings usually have to give up some level of their autonomy. At the same time, they
have to see the entire population served by the clinic. As a result, they need to
develop specific skills for focused and quick assessments, provide brief practical
advice, do their job in very short times, make decisions with limited amount of data,
develop skills for enhancing motivation to change, use brief interventions,
communicate efficiently with the medical staff (i.e., avoid jargon, be brief and
focused), tolerate a rather low position in the hierarchy (physicians are usually the
„chief‟), be flexible in their hours and available to patients and medical staff
whenever there is need. Psychologists in primary care might also have to be quite
„creative‟ in their practice in order to be more effective (e.g., use telephone or web
conferences, use the phone of even the fax to provide advice, advise the other
members of the team in „unusual‟ opportunities, e.g., during lunch). Furthermore,
counselling psychologists sometimes have to work hard to spotlight their identity
and their skills, since there is still considerable confusion and lack of information
regarding their role in care provision (e.g., Lewis & Bor, 1998). All these can be quite
burdensome to the psychologists and significantly tax their abilities to adapt.
Consequently, they often avoid primary care settings.
On the other hand, medical settings may provide opportunities for the
counselling psychologists to display their unique knowledge and skills, as in the case
of cross-cultural health care. The ways a person perceives symptoms, reacts to illness,
thinks about health and behaves are routed in her/his culture and culture-related
belief system (Pedersen, 1997). A growing literature describes the strong associations
between differences in culture, and health, well-being, health related beliefs and
behaviours (e.g., Arrendondo et al., 1996; Marks, Murray, Evans, & Willig, 2000;
Salant & Lauderdale, 2003), while there is evidence that cultural differences are
associated with perceptions about the cause or the appropriate treatment of a disease
(e.g., Karasz, 2005). Culture is so important for health and illness that many diseases
seem to be „caused‟ by local cultural habits (e.g., Boirin, 1997; Schensul, Mekki-
Berrada, Nastasi, Saggurti, & Varma, 2006). Nevertheless, a major problem in the
medical setting is the difficulty of the medical personnel to take into consideration
the role of culture or cross-cultural variables (Atkinson, 2002; Prislin, Suarez,
Simpson, & Dyer, 1998). Therefore, it lies with the psychologists to help medical
personnel realize the significance of culture and cultural differences, and also
promote „cultural sensitive‟ or „cultural focused‟ intervention programs (Pedersen,
1997), in order to facilitate patients‟ adaptation and enhance well-being and health.
Even with these opportunities, there is still a possibility that some counselling
psychologists worry about counselling psychology losing its identity (Tyler, 1980).
For example, Bernard (1992) and Good (1992) are afraid that counselling
psychologists working in medical settings will alienate from their colleagues. On the
contrary, Altmaier, Johnson and Paulsen (1998) support that no alienation will occur
and counselling psychologists will keep their identity. In the same line, Mrdjenovich
and Moore (2004) believe that counselling health psychology will maintain ties with
the substantial area of counselling psychology and will not turn to be a „subspecialty‟
of health psychology. These authors define professional identity as the sense of
practice, train other health professionals, as well as consult health care personnel and
managers (Michie et al., 2004).
Alcorn (1998) proposed an integration of certain courses with the core curriculum
in counselling psychology. These courses are: introduction to health psychology,
medical aspects of disability, psychopharmacology, medical terminology,
neuropsychology, and community health. He also stressed the importance of the
integration of science and practice (which, nevertheless, is common ground among
counselling psychologists), as well as the necessity for training in the
multidisciplinary nature of the work in medical health settings.
Equally, if not more, important are the internship experiences in medical settings
and hospitals for the counselling psychologists interested in health psychology. Well-
designed internships in different medical clinics, rehabilitation centres, pain clinics,
medical schools or similar settings, under the supervision of experts, are essential for
a good practice. Internships should be designed in a way to help young trainees
adapt their knowledge and skills in the health setting, as well as prepare them to deal
with a variety of difficulties and problems. It should also be noted that internship in
specific settings (e.g., pain clinics) is a possible pathway through which professional
specialization can be achieved.
The specific form that training in counselling health psychology should take
depends on many factors: the educational system of each country, the form of the
health care system, history, needs, and special conditions. For instance, in the USA to
qualify for board certification in clinical health psychology, a doctoral degree in
psychology (e.g., in Counselling Health Psychology) is needed, among other
requirements regarding training, internship, continuing education and current
professional work (ABPP, 1999). Counselling psychologists seem to applaud the
development of health psychology as a post-doctoral specialty field (Alcorn, 1998).
Likewise, a post-doctoral training in health psychology-related issues might be a
solution for British counselling psychologists. (It should be noticed here that also the
European Association for Counselling Psychology (EACP) accepts as full members
only those counselling psychologists who are qualified at a doctoral level (see the
Statuses of the EACP, http://www.counselling-psychology.eu). Alternatively, as the
British educational system is flexible, the establishment of a „joint‟ counselling (and)
health psychology training program could be an answer to the question. A first step
might be the establishment of a special interest group within the Division of
Counselling Psychology of the BPS, which will encourage the development of these
efforts. Such a group is already operating within the Division of Clinical Psychology
since 1998 (http://www.bps.org.uk/dcp-facchp/). On the other hand, in countries
like mine, Greece, where PhD is strictly an academic title that requires no
professional training, other solutions appear to be more appropriate: the inclusion of
health psychology-related courses in the counselling psychology post-graduate
curricula, or internship in health settings and on-the-job training might fit better.
Conclusion
References
Aarø, L. E., Flisher, A. J., Kaaya, S., Onya, H., Fuglesang, M., Klepp, K., & Schaalma,
H. (2006). Promoting sexual and reproductive health in early adolescence in
South Africa and Tanzania: Development of a theory- and evidence-based
intervention programme. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 34, 150-158.
Altmaier, E. M., Johnson, B. D., & Paulsen, J. S. (1998). Issues in professional identity.
In S. Roth-Roemer, S.R. Robinson Kurpius, & C. Carmin (Eds.), The emerging
role of counselling psychology in health care (pp. 7-29). New York: W.W. Norton
& Company.
Ansseau, M., Dierick, M., Buntinkx, F., Cnockaert, P., De Smedt, J., Van Den Haute,
M., & Vander Mijnsbrugge, D. (2004). High prevalence of mental disorders in
primary care. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56, 49-55.
Arrendondo, P., Toporek, R., Brown, S. P., Jones, J., Locke, D. C., & Sanchez, J. (1996).
Operationalization of the multicultural counselling competencies. Journal of
Multicultural Counselling and Development, 24, 42-78.
Atkinson, S. (2002). Political cultures, health systems and health policy. Social Science
& Medicine, 55, 113-124.
Ayers, S., Baum, A., McManus, C., Newman, S., Wallston, K., Weinman, J., & West,
R. (2007). Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Baker, R., Allen, H., Gibson, S., Newth, J., & Baker, E. (1998). Evaluation of a primary
care counselling service in Dorset. British Journal of General Practice, 48, 1049-
1053.
Belar, C. D., & Deardorff, W. W. (1995). Clinical Health Psychology in Medical Settings.
A practitioner’s guidebook. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Bellg, A. J. (2004). Clinical cardiac psychology. In P. Camic & S. Knight (Eds.), Clinical
handbook of health psychology (pp.30-57). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Bennett, P., Conner, M., & Godin, G. (2004). Changing behaviour to improve health.
In S. Michie & C. Abraham (2004), Health psychology in practice (pp. 267-284).
Oxford: Blackwell.
Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Keefe, F. J., Davis, R.D., LaCaille, R. A., Carney, R.
M., Parekh P. I., Freedland, K. E., Trulock E., & Palmer, S. M. (2006).
Telephone-based coping skills training for patients awaiting lung
transplantation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 535-544.
Bor, R., & du Plessis, P. (1997). The impact of HIV/AIDS on families: An overview of
recent research. Families, Systems, & Health, 15, 413-427.
Bor, R., du Plessis, P., & Russell, M. (2004). The impact of disclosure of HIV on the
index patient‟s self-defined family. Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 167-192.
Bower, P., Rowland, N., & Hardy, R. (2003). The clinical effectiveness of counselling
in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological
Medicine, 33, 203-215.
British Psychological Society (2005). English survey of applied psychologists in health and
social care and in the probation and prison service. Leicester: The British
Psychological Society.
British Psychological Society (2007). New ways of working for applied psychologists in
health and social care. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Earll, L., & Bath, J. (2004). Consultancy: What is it, how do you do it, and does it
make any difference. In S. Michie & C. Abraham (2004), Health psychology in
practice (pp.230-250). Oxford: Blackwell.
Eatock, J. (2000). Counselling in primary care: past, present and future. British Journal
of Counselling, 28, 161-173.
Foster, J. (2000). Counselling in primary care and the new NHS. British Journal of
Guidance & Counselling, 28, 175-190.
Gatchel, R. J., & Oordt, M. S. (2003). Clinical health psychology and primary care.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gidron, Y., Davidson, K., & Bata, I. (1999). The short-term effects of a hostility-
reduction intervention on male coronary heart disease patients. Health
Psychology, 18, 416-420.
Griva, K., & Newman, S. (2007). Quality of life in end-stage renal disease and
treatments. In F. Anagnostopoulos & E.C. Karademas (Eds.), Special issues in
health psychology: A Greek perspective (pp. 97-130). Athens: Livani Publishing.
Kagan, N., Altmaier, E. M., Dowd, E. T., Hansen, J. C., Mills, D. H., Schlossberg, N.,
Sprinthall, N. A., Tanney, M. F., & Vasquez, M. J. (1988). Professional practice
of counselling psychology in various settings. The Counselling Psychologist, 16,
347-365.
Kent, G., & Keohane, S. (2001). Social anxiety and disfigurement: The moderating
effects of fear of negative evaluation and past experience. British Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 40, 23-44.
Khazam, A. (1996). You don’t have to die from cancer. Melbourne: Hill of Content.
Kunen, S., Smith, P.O., Niederhauser, R., Morris, J. A., & Marx, B. D. (2005). Race
disparities in psychiatric rates in emergency departments. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 116-126.
Lang, E. V., Benotsch, E. G., Fick, L. J., Lutgendorf, S., Berbaum, M. L., Berbaum, K.
S., Logan, H., & Spiegel, D. (2000). Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia
for invasive medical procedures: A randomised trial. The Lancet, 355, 1486-
1490.
Layard, R. (2005). Mental health: Britain‟s biggest social problem? Retrieved October
15, 2007 from:
http://www.strategy.gov.uk/downloads/files/mh_layard.pdf.
Lenihan, P., & Iliffe, S. (2000). Counselling the community: the contribution of
counselling psychologists to the development of primary care. Counselling
Psychology Quarterly, 13, 329-343.
Lewis, S., & Bor, R. (1998). How counselling psychologists are perceived by NHS
clinical psychologists. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 11, 427-437.
Marks, D. F., Murray, M., Evans, B., & Willig, C. (2000). Health Psychology: theory,
research and practice. London: Sage.
Michie, S., Abraham, C., & Johnston, M. (2004). Health psychology training: the UK
Model. In S. Michie & C. Abraham (2004), Health psychology in practice (pp. 7-
45). Oxford: Blackwell.
Mrdjenovich, A.J., & Moore, B.A. (2004). The professional identity of counselling
psychologists in health care: a review and call for research. Counselling
Psychology Quarterly, 17, 69-79.
Neimeyer, G. L., Bowman, J., & Stewart, A. E. (2001). Internship and initial job
placements in counselling psychology: A 26-year retrospective. The
Counselling Psychologist, 29, 763-780.
Nicolau, R., Toro, J., & Perez Prado, C. (1991). Behavioural treatment of a case of
psychogenic urinary retention. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental
Psychiatry, 22, 63-68.
Papadopoulos, L., Walker, C., Aitken, D., & Bor, R. (2000). The relationship between
body location and psychological morbidity in individuals with acne vulgaris.
Psychology, Health & Medicine, 5, 431-438.
Papas, R. K., Belar, C. D., & Rozensky, R. H. (2004). The practice of clinical health
psychology: Professional issues. In T. J. Boll, R. G. Frank, A. Baum & J. L.
Wallander (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology (vol. 3, pp. 293-319).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Prislin, R., Suarez, L., Simpson D. M., & Dyer, J. A. (1998). When acculturation hurts:
The case of immunization. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 1947-1956.
Pruitt, S. D., Klapow, J. C., Epping-Jordon, J. E., & Dresselhaus, T. R. (1998). Moving
behavioural medicine to the front line: A model for the integration of
behavioural and medical sciences in primary care. Professional Psychology:
Research and Practice, 29, 230-236.
Robinson Kurpius, S. E., & Vaughn Fielder, K. (1998). Ethical issues and the health
care setting. In S. Roth-Roemer, S. R. Robinson Kurpius, & C. Carmin (Eds.),
The emerging role of counselling psychology in health care (pp. 55-73). New York:
W. W. Norton & Company.
Roth-Roemer, S., Robinson Kurpius, S. R., & Carmin, C. (1998). The emerging role of
counselling psychology in health care. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Rutter, D. R., & Quine, L. (2002). Changing health behaviour: Intervention and research
with social cognition. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Schensul, S. L., Mekki-Berrada, A., Nastasi, B., Saggurti, N., & Verma, R. K. (2006).
Healing traditions and men‟s sexual health in Mumbai, India: The realities of
practiced medicine in urban poor communities. Social Science & Medicine, 62,
2774-2785.
Spira, J. L., & Reed, G. M. (2002). Group psychotherapy for women with breast cancer.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stedman, J. M., Hatch, J. P., Keilin, W. G., & Schoenfeld, L. S. (2005). The structure of
internship training: Current patterns and implications for the future of
clinical and counselling psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and
Practice, 36, 3-8.
Suls, J., & Rothman, A. (2004). Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: Prospects and
challenges for health psychology. Health Psychology, 23, 119-125.
Thoresen, C. E., & Eangleston, J. R. (1985). Counselling for health. The Counselling
Psychologist, 13, 15-87.
Tyler, L. E. (1980). The next twenty years. The Counselling Psychologist, 8, 19-21.
Walker, S. B., & London, S. (2007). Novel tools and resources for evidence-based
practice in psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 633-642.
Walsh, Y., Frankland, A., & Cross, M. (2004). Qualifying and working as a
counselling psychologist in the United Kingdom. Counselling Psychology
Quarterly, 17, 317-328.
Wang, C., Gonzalez, R., & Merajver, S. D. (2004). Assessment of genetic testing and
related counselling services. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1427-1442.