Upendra Baxi On Crisis in The Indian Legal System
Upendra Baxi On Crisis in The Indian Legal System
Upendra Baxi On Crisis in The Indian Legal System
A legal system consists of (a) the rules or norms of social as well as official behaviour; (b) rule-
making authorities such as legislatures, government, courts and other statutory and corporate
bodies which have powers of subordinate legislation: (c) dispute-settling institutions such as
courts, tribunals, panchayats, arbitrators, etc.; (d) law enforcing agencies such as police, prison,
civil service, government, etc.; (e) functionaries such as lawyers, judges, etc. According to
Upendra Baxi, the Indian Legal System (ILS), which is a continuation of the British Indian Legal
System (BILS), has failed and even obstructed the transformation of Indian society towards a
democratic and egalitarian society.
Upendar Baxi defines crisis in his book- ‘Crisis in the Indian Legal system’ (1982) as a
situation where "the structure of a social system allows fewer possibilities for problem solving
than are necessary for the continued existence of the legal system". A situation of crisis might
arise where people desire change but are unable to initiate or attain it. In his book he delves
upon the Concept of Rule of law and pointed out some basic contradictions in the ILS at that
particular time.
1) While the basic model of the Constitution and the ILS is legal liberalism, the ILS' in its
institutional dimensions displays weak adherence to legalism and the justice values of
the rule of law.
2) The Constitution envisages a revolutionary break with the past, whereas the ILS retains
considerable continuity with the colonial past. The only exception to such continuity is
provided by Article 13 which says that all laws in force immediately before the
commencement of the Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the
provisions of Part III (fundamental rights) shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be
void.
3) The Constitution stresses decentralisation of political power through the principle of
federalism. But in actual practice, the institutional operations of the ILS are
predominantly marked by centralisation of political power, thus going against the
concept of federalism.
4) The workings of the law/legal system is such that it restricts and even prevents the
elementary forms of access to law, access to information, to courts and to law making
bodies.
His basic concern at that particular time was the legal system that was created by the
Constitution and other laws, did not cater to certain pertinent issue of a well-established legal
system. Upendra Baxi's discourses on the legal system are doubtless a significant contribution
to socio-legal literature. It has focused attention on the urgent need to make the ILS more
responsive to the needs and aspirations of the people. - He tells us most emphatically that what
the ILS needs is a thorough restructuring.
However, since that time a lot has changed in the Indian Legal system. There have been great
and significant steps taken by the government to bolster the Indian Legal System like, Right to
Information Act, Environment Protection Act, and Sexual Harassment of Women at
Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act. In fact even the Judiciary has played
an important role by contributing to the legal system by playing an activist role leading to the
growth of Public Interest Litigation, wide interpretation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution
(right to privacy, right to sleep, right to live with human dignity etc.)