Assembly of Parts
Assembly of Parts
Assembly of Parts
PART -A
10 Mention the importance of geometric tolerancing. (N/D -15)
..s: f;z..L. €If ...i::n oU V.L oLu.~ J~~ t:WI tJ aJ,U:J t;K),.,_h1,# Vo·"'; a...h 0'-'
/o.e.hve.eA .f~~.
2. Define the following terms: (a) Interference fit (b) Running and sliding fit. (N/D - 15)
tal..L ~ i on Of tJ n.I- pov.-t J.b!J U~ e 'Z C.Cltul..LJ f1..t.- J:n foe "if'rvJ
~ at'l U :!A.J:;r fa'l' t..a f...u, ~ 1Y>A!j biz c(..td A..c..A1tJ U. (wr ("N,
___ •• _ o. _. __ ••
3. What is meant by assembly modelling? (M/J - 16)
~ ku. €.\I e.A- rn 0 A.6.- ,..,., a,.n 0 N... f'{) J...ur.~ j,.A. ._j}, ~ .5 tv ~
VJ~
5. List out four parameters which are calculated by mass property calculations. (N/D - 16)
b· Duw.~
c,.. V'o...u..vnc
c..OO .,g +-0011 ~ ~ eu> ~ (l.rf') ~ ~ h:j J.un p.l.tJ o.p t1l~" ffl_ tJtm ern b ~ •
1'1...L ... e. ...ta, ~ buw e.PP (U') ;OW:>eff> b LtJ ,."d.ih ~ ~ v.t otc-t,v p ~ J4 ~
M IJ J ~ . .../)r') p 0 ,-t-~ ~ c1. a.. t'N-,J-,J C() fI t£p +- be...A.t:nd ~ 4!I'n b .':!I N) c~ fJ .
1Y>Q4.(~ ~ ~.AL-r ~ t:I ./....em p.At y & m~rf-a.fc -rr«: J.J.a.,I1 Of) -d A4> oS a.r..J
a--n (HO h-1J ;..M ....t ~ tI-os ~. a..n €;'f) b A-CtA eo r-.6 •.c:.o ~ Of' +e......
'4>p yt) ttl c:.A ~ f'ncVl"" ,,~~ fN- ~../. 9 r» c!J,f ..1.~ aA'> ~ h~ ~
'11- o..il.ot-\d 0.. ('TO Je.cI ~.. ~ ~ ur pro atu.. V ~ pe-c..i fr CpJ,'O,J ~.
~ ~ ~~tJ o-p P l"'Oa (;), I:P r=clu. c."f oJ.,tA..I ~ "...in co tv cJo .ff.t,
CAO NY" ) cJ.,{o v.J-.d d..a I'rl b tAX~ ~ I~ r» ..fea.1'..d ~ 11'./0 riA tol"l CAA 'rr'~ ~
ol.<.A-~ J ~.i 0'-' tv /'B£J~ eo f....i).J_ ru. A-'n em b --4J ...t...~ ~ Jc.6
h~8 .J;.i;ntUJ.~.
7J.J._ a....<Uu.~ or € ~~
...e, ~ Q._u.<J ~ .
., \ F= m- c.n-mJ 1
I ,
f()
,...
'r1'l'1el 'X
~ L
'Z..
ell rt') 0.'X.
.t = I
1\
.>f ~ 4/) ~ iA f"N._fY..<) tJ P.MJ v...c. o(L!J ,tM ...e:,(;,.~ erJ cI..uJ..f S" ,j..uw &:...tal:::!
ill ~---
l\l
.-- -._"-:
,.J
VI.:fO
: ",I, 0
V\ ...
-LP
~,.o
K:::.'
-------- -- _-'"
-
s {~14/1? I e-h..
e:,'"T"5 e..,p.~ e'X-p...l.Jn rtN- .ft:,,U.o LO,.v..,9 ~".. oU. hon...1. Io.-&..'t'-eu? (..L ~.....Pp ~
[N(D _'15J
(t..) eo 0 + .f u.m S«tU-~
t:» to -IS]
r ,.. - -~
r
r
-,,
I
/
F
I
/
6'.
olu...t cA- ~ t:N'I 4 'No f-N_ P OJ Lb.iV l::J t>+ 4 .Ppe t.." {lue:J. ~ EUn b~ P lICK? -10.,.
jjJ ,.dm
m
ro
J> J j S d-'X. d'd' d.'1-
'X ~ ~
""1 ~ x :-
jJ S l-jdfY)
J'()
-
,..
J> Jj j ~. ctv
v
t--f ~ ~ ~
JJJ IY>
z.. of ro ,.. p
1J J ".1-. rJ"
\I
0.. .9 tve/' at. ?t;..to ..L:/J e.....~A1 }:# ~ pro du Cf 0+ I-N. m p...D t:A-ttJ. tft-t_ J. ~t'V..L
Unit – IV
Part – A
6. What are the issues that are to be considered before starting assembly design?
The three important points that are to be considered are
1. Identify the dependencies between the components of an assembly. 2. Identify the dependencies
between the features of each part. 3. Analyze the order of assembling the parts.
15. Define the following terms: a) Interference fit b) Running and sliding fit
Interference fit: A fit between mating parts having limits of size so prescribed that an interference
always result in an assembly
Running and sliding fit: A special type of clearance fit. These are intended to provide a similar running
performance with suitable lubrication allowance throughout the range of sizes.
Part – B
The designer usually has approach to models that others are functioning on
concurrently. For example, different people may be creating one machine that has
different components. New parts are extra to an assembly model as they are generated.
Every designer has approach to the assembly model, during a work in progress, and while
working in their own components. The design development is noticeable to everyone
participated. Based on the system, it might be essential for the users to obtain the most
recent versions saved of every individual component to update the assembly.
The personal data files defining the 3D geometry of personal components are
assembled together via a number of sub assembly levels to generate an assembly
explaining the complete product. Every CAD methods support the bottom-up
construction. A few systems, through associative copying of geometry between
components allow top-down construction. Components can be situated within the
assembly applying absolute coordinate position methods.
Mating conditions are defines of the relative location of mechanism between each
other; for example axis position of two holes or distance between two faces. The final
place of all objects based on these relationships is computing using a geometry constraint
engine built into the CAD package.
Every part is included into the active part making a component request and thus an
assembly. The component will be the child of the active part and then it will be the active part.
Hence an instance of the actual part is applied; it revises automatically if the archived part is
edited by activating.
Bottom up Hierarchy:
The ‘bottom up’ assembly design hierarchy of the basic assembly is shown in figure . All
the parts exist prior to Part1. When Part1 is generated, it becomes the active. It would utilize
the menu sequence to add Bracket and it becomes the active part.
Insert > Component
Or
Assembly Design Tool Bar >
In automated assembly schemes, most parts are assembled along with the principal
axis. Hence, to fine interference between parts while assembly, the projected technique
referred six assembly directions along with the principal assembly axis: +x, -x, +y, -y, +z, and -z.
But, the method could be improved, to think other assembly directions, as required. The
projected system uses projection of part coordinates onto planes in three principal axis (x, y ,z)
to find the obstruction between parts sliding along some of the six principal assembly axis. The
projections overlap between any two parts in a specified axis direction shows a potential
interference between the two parts, when one of the two parts slides along the specified
direction, with respect to the other. Vertex coordinates for overlapped
projections are then evaluated to find if real collisions would happen between parts with
overlapped projections. The planned process stores the determined interference data for
allocated assembly direction in a group of interference free matrices, for compatibility with
previous planners of assembly.
The swept volume interference and the multiple interference detection systems are
appropriate for three-dimensional interference determination between B-REP entities. But,
both techniques were developed for real-time interference detection between two moving
parts in a simulation environment. As a result, these two techniques are expensive in
computationally. For the assembly planning issue, actual collision finding capacity along
subjective relative motion vectors is not require. Instead, a efficient computational technique
is required for finding if two parts will collide when they are assembled in a specified order
along any one of the six principle assembly axis.
Tolerance stack-up
Tolerance stack-up computations show the collective effect of part tolerance with
respect to an assembly need. The tolerances ‘stacking up’ would describe to adding tolerances
to obtain total part tolerance, then evaluating that to the existing gap in order to see if the
design will work suitably. This simple evaluation is also defined as ‘worst case analyses’. Worst
case analysis is suitable for definite needs where failure would signify failure for a company. It
is also needful and suitable for problems that occupy a low number of parts. Worst case
analysis is always carried out in a single direction that is a 1-D analysis. If the analysis has part
dimensions that are not parallel to the assembly measurement being defined, the stack-up
approach must be edited since 2D variation such as angles, or any variation that is not parallel
with the 1-D direction, does not influence the measurement of assembly with a 1-to-1 ratio.
The tolerance stacking issue occurs in the perception of assemblies from
interchangeable parts because of the inability to create or join parts accurately according to
nominal. Either the applicable part dimension changes around various nominal value from
part by part or it is the act of assembly that directs to variation. For example, as two parts are
combined through matching holes pair there is not only variation in the location of the holes
relative to nominal centers on the parts but also the slippage difference of matching holes
relative to each other when safe.
Thus there is the opportunity that the assembly of such interacting parts will not move
or won’t come closer as planned. This can generally be judged by different assembly criteria,
say G1, G2,... Here we will be discussed with just one assembly criterion, say G, which can be
noted as a function of the part dimensions L1,...,Ln. A example is shown in Figure 4.7., where n
= 6 and is the clearance gap of interest. It finds whether the stack of cogwheels will locate
within the case or not. Thus it is preferred to have G > 0, but for performance of functional
causes one may also require to limit G.
G = L1 − (L2 + L3 + L4 + L5 + L6)
= L1 − L2 − L3 − L4 − L5 − L6
Fig. Tolerance Stack-up
As per the example, the required lengths ‘Li ‘may vary from the nominal lengths ‘λi’ by
a small value. If there is higher variation in the ‘Li’ there may well be important problems in
accepting G > 0. Thus it is sensible to limit these changes via tolerances. For similar tolerances,
‘Ti’, represent an ‘upper limit’ on the absolute variation between actual and nominal values of
the i th detail part dimension, it is means that |Li − λi| ≤ Ti. It is mostly in the interpretation of
this last inequality that the different methods of tolerance stacking vary.
The nominal value ‘γ’of G is typically computed by replacing in equation L1 − L2 − L3 − L4 − L5 −
L6, the actual values of Li’s by the corresponding nominal values of λi, that is γ = λ1 − λ2 − λ3 −
λ4 − λ5 − λ 6.
5. Write short notes on statistical method for tolerance analysis.
Typically Tstat assy is considerably smaller than T arith assy. For n=3, the scale of this variation
is simply visualized and valued by a rectangular box with side lengths T1, T2 and T3. To obtain
from one corner of the box to the diagonally opposite corner, one can cross the gap T21 + T22 +
T23 along that diagonal and follow the three edges with lengths T1, T2, and T3 for a total length
T= T1 + T2 +T3 as shown in figure .
Due to the manufacturing methods changing for various types of components, the
distribution moments vary as well. RSS only applies standard deviation and does not contain the
upper moments of skewness and kurtosis that describe the effects tool wear, form aging and
other classical manufacturing situations. Second Order Tolerance Analysis includes all types of
distribution moments as shown in figure 4.9
As shown in the figure . the axes do not create a best reference hence a small error in
squareness of the base of the cylinder origins the object to tilt away from the vertical axis.
An axis should always pass via a surface that is firmly linked with the bulk of the component. As
shown in the figure, it would be best to position the origin (Z=0) at the end of the component
rather than the fitting that is freely dimensioned virtual to the end.
Calculating Center of gravity location
The center of gravity of an object is:
described the ‘center of mass’ of the object.
the location where the object would balance.
the single point where the static balance moments are all zero about three mutually
perpendicular axis.
the centroid of object the volume when the object is homogeneous.
the point where the total mass of the component could be measured to be concentrated
while static calculations.
the point about where the component rotates in free space
the point via the gravity force can be considered to perform
the point at which an exterior force must be used to create translation of an object in space
Center of gravity location is stated in units of length along the three axes (X, Y, and Z).
These three components of the vector distance from the base of the coordinate system to the
Center of gravity location. CG of composite masses is computed from moments considered
about the origin. The essential dimensions of moment are Force and Distance. On the other
hand, Mass moment may be utilized any units of Mass times Distance. For homogeneous
components, volume moments may also be considered. Care should be taken to be confident
that moments for all parts are defined in compatible units.
Component distances for CG position may be either positive or negative, and in reality
their polarity based on the reference axis position. The CG of a homogeneous component is
determined by determining the Centroid of its volume. In practical, the majority of components
are not homogeneous, so that the CG must be calculated by adding the offset moments along all
of the three axes.