The Role of Delayed Cord Clamping in Improving The Outcome in Preterm Babies
The Role of Delayed Cord Clamping in Improving The Outcome in Preterm Babies
The Role of Delayed Cord Clamping in Improving The Outcome in Preterm Babies
Introduction
Before the mid-1950s, the term early clamping was defined as umbilical cord clamping
within 1 min of birth, and late clamping was defined as cord clamping more than 5 minutes
after birth [1,2]. Because of the several studies done on blood volume change after birth,
which reported that 80-100 ml of blood transfer from the placenta to the newborn in the
first 3 minutes after birth, and up to 90% of that blood volume The total number of babies included in the study was 160
transfer was achieved within the first few breaths in healthy preterm, where the protocol of DCC was applied on 79
term infants, the time between birth and cord clamping was preterm. With approval by the institutional review board,
shortened to be 15-20 seconds after birth [3-5]. prospective and retrospective data were extracted from
But recently several systematic reviews have suggested maternal and neonatal electronic medical records. The
that clamping the umbilical cord in all births should be prospective study period was 13 months, from Aug 2014. The
delayed for atleast 30–60 seconds, with the infant maintained study period for the historic cohort was also 13 months, from
at or below the level of the placenta because of the associated February 2014. Collected data included maternal demographics,
neonatal benefits, including increased blood volume, reduced obstetric complications, any antenatal steroid and magnesium
need for blood transfusion, decreased incidence of intracranial use, and other labor and delivery variables. Neonatal data
hemorrhage in preterm infants, and lower frequency of iron included gestational age, birth weight, sex, post-delivery data
deficiency anemia in term infants [2,4,6,7]. variables such as Apgar scores, resuscitation data, and the
infant’s temperature upon admission to the neonatal intensive
WHO recommendations 2012, based on several randomized
care unit. Other clinical variables included treatment with
controlled studies, for basic newborn resuscitation are, in newly
phototherapy, (intensive phototherapy defined as irradiance
born babies who do not require positive-pressure ventilation,
in the blue-green spectrum of at least 30 µW/cm2 per nm).
the cord should not be clamped earlier than 1 min after birth [6].
For all tests of significance, p-values less than 0.05 were
The aim of our study is to compare between immediate
considered statistically significant and were used as evidence
and delayed cord clamping in preterm infants less than 37
against the null hypothesis of no difference between DCC and
weeks, and its effect on the outcomes of such babies.
ICC participants. All statistical methods were performed using
the SAS software system (Release 8.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary,
Aim of the Study NC, USA).
To study the effect of delayed cord clamping on premature
infants. Results
During the prospective study period, after implementation
Patients and Methods of DCC protocol 79 infants were born at less than 37 weeks’
On average, our level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit gestation. After excluding multiple gestation infants, DCC was
cares for approximately 200 preterm inborn infants every performed on all of the 79 eligible infants per pre specified
year. The previous routine clinical practice was to clamp the protocol (DCC). During the retrospective study period, 81
umbilical cord immediately after the birth. The DCC process infants were born at less than 37 weeks’ gestation, all of these
was implemented starting August 2014. All infants born at infants received immediate umbilical cord clamping (ICC)
less than 37 weeks’ gestation were eligible for DCC, unless after birth. There were no significant differences in maternal
they met the following exclusion criteria: severe maternal characteristics. Artificial reproductive therapy and cesarean
illness that prompted immediate delivery, placental causes delivery numbers were not different between the groups.
(abruption or previa) or fetal causes (multiple gestation, major Similarly, there were no differences in other maternal variables
congenital anomalies, severe growth restriction, or hydrops such as chorioamnionitis, gestational hypertension or
fetalis). After birth, the infant was left unstimulated, attached diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, or poly- or oligohydramnios.
at or slightly below the level of placenta for 45 seconds. The Overall antenatal steroid administration and maternal
cord was then clamped and cut, and the neonatal team magnesium exposure were similar between the groups. There
initiated resuscitation efforts. Apgar timing was initiated at were no significant differences in baseline neonatal
the time of birth when the infant was delivered completely. characteristics between the two groups. Mean gestational
We placed the baby at or below the level of the placenta as age was 34 weeks in the ICC group compared with 34.1 weeks
feasible. Because most of the preterm deliveries in our in the DCC group; mean birth weight was 2250 g in the ICC
institution were cesarean sections, it was a challenge getting cohort compared with 2325 g in the DCC cohort. Male infants
the baby truly below the level of the placenta. Because good represented 35% in DCC group, compared to 38% in the ICC
evidence is emerging in more mature infants, the optimal group. There were no significant differences in 1- and
timing and positioning in a very preterm infant still must be 5-minute Apgar scores, admission temperature or Ph, PCO2,
explored. A large percentage of deliveries did not receive PO2 done at birth from the umbilical cord. However,
DCC because of our predefined narrow eligibility criteria. The significantly fewer infants in the DCC cohort were intubated in
question of DCC being beneficial or harmful in these higher the delivery room compared with the ICC cohort. Significant
risk excluded infants (such as multiple gestations, growth differences in glucose levels with those in the DCC group
restricted, and other vulnerable preterm groups) must be having higher initial glucose levels than those in the ICC
explored carefully in the future. We were aware of the different group. Red blood cell transfusion need in the first week of life
approaches reported in the literature like umbilical cord was significantly lower in the DCC cohort compared with the
milking and mobile trolley use that may minimize delay in ICC, although the use of pressor support or corticosteroids
resuscitation. was not different. Phototherapy in first week of life was
In our study, the number of babies who needed improved outcomes. In conclusion, we have implemented
phototherapy in the DCC group were significantly higher than DCC process successfully in a large delivery hospital. DCC, as
ICC group. One analysis found a very slight (2%) increase in performed in our hospital, was associated with a significant
jaundice among babies who received delayed cord clamping. reduction in IVH and early red blood cell transfusion. Further
However, according to the Thinking Midwife, “The only clinical studies are needed to optimize the timing and
studies available involve the administration of an artificial technique of DCC and to report the impact of this potentially
oxytocic (syntocinon or syntometrine) in the ‘delayed valuable procedure on long term neuro developmental
clamping’ group IV syntocinon is associated with jaundice. outcomes of the preterm infants.
Therefore, it could be the oxytocic making a difference here–
not the clamping. Other studies, found “that the difference References
between early and late cord clamping for clinical jaundice did
1. Ibrahim HM, Krouskop RW, Lewis DF, Dhanireddy R. Placental transfusion:
not reach statistical significance. Another concern sometimes umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2000; 20(6): 351-354.
mentioned is polycythemia, or blood that is too thick to
2. Yao AC, Lind J. Placental transfusion. Am J Dis Child. 1974; 127(1): 128–
properly oxygenate tissues. Researchers also looked at this 141. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1974.02110200130021
issue and did not find anything statistically significant [23,24].
3. Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and
In agreement with other studies, our study showed Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 543: Timing of umbilical cord
significantly lower number of pt with IVH and suspected NEC clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(6): 1522–1526. doi: 10.1097/01.
in DCC group. There is growing evidence that enhanced AOG.0000423817.47165.48
placental transfusion by delaying umbilical cord clamping 4. Linderkamp O. Placental transfusion: determinants and effects. Clin
(DCC) in preterm infants may improve hemodynamic stability Perinatol. 1982; 9(3): 559-592
after birth and decrease the incidence of major neonatal 5. Philip AGS, Saigal S. When should we clamp the umbilical cord? Neo
Reviews. 2004; 5(4).
morbidities, such as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and
necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) [24,25]. Delayed clamping also 6. WHO. Guidelines on basic newborn resuscitation. Geneva, World Health
Organization; 2012.
results in an infusion of “stem cells, which play an essential
role in the development of the immune, respiratory, 7. Al-Wassia H, Shah PS. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at
birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(1):
cardiovascular, and central nervous systems, among many
18–25. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1906
other functions. The concentration of stem cells in fetal blood
8. Jelin AC, Kupperman M, Erickson K, Clyman R, Schulkin J. Obstetrician’s
is higher than at any other time of life. ICC [immediate cord attitudes and beliefs regarding umbilical cord clamping. J Matern Fetal
clamping] leaves nearly one-third of these critical cells in the Neonatal Med. 2014; 27(14): 1457–1461. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.864275
placenta. Stem cells may also “help to repair any brain damage 9. Farrar D, Tuffnell D, Airey R, Duley L. Care during the third stage of labour:
the baby might have suffered during a difficult birth,” [26,27]. a postal survey of UK midwives and obstetricians. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth. 2010; 10-23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-23
This study has several limitations. This study reports
observational data of a process from a single center. Thus, 10. Ononeze AB, Hutchon DJ. Attitude of obstetricians towards delayed cord
clamping: a questionnaire-based study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29(3):
conclusions from this study are limited to associations.
223–224. doi: 10.1080/01443610802712918
Confounding of the results by other changes in practice is
11. Reynolds GJ. Beyond sweetness and warmth: transition of the preterm
also a risk. However, our practice did not change much during infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008; 93(1): F2–F3. doi: 10.1136/
the study period other than more widespread use of non adc.2007.120790
mechanical ventilation in very preterm infants. This might 12. Bell EF. Increasing the placental transfusion for preterm infants. Obstet
have had some impact on our lower intubation and surfactant Gynecol. 2011; 117(2): 203–204. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182056828
administration rates. The radiologists reading the cranial 13. Redmond D, Isana S, Ingall D. Relation of onset of respiration to placental
ultrasound scans were not blinded formally, but they were not transfusion. Lancet. 1965; 285(7380): 283–285. doi: 10.1016/S0140-
aware of the implementation of DCC. There is also the 6736(65)91025-1
question of generalizability because the data reported are 14. Kjeldsen J. Pedersen J. Relation of residual placental blood volume to
from a single center. Despite these limitations, we believe it is onset of respiration and respiratory distress syndrome in infants of
diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. Lancet. 1967; 289(7483): 180–184. doi:
important to share our observations, which more likely reflect 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)91823-5
the real world clinical practice and address some of the
15. Bound JP, Harvey PW, Bagshaw HB. Prevention of pulmonary syndrome
concerns that are impeding the widespread practice of DCC in of the newborn. Lancet. 1962; 280(7249): 1200–1203.
preterm infants.
16. Usher RH, Saigal S, O’Neill A, Surainder Y, Chua LB. Estimation of red
blood cell volume in premature infants with and without respiratory
Conclusion distress syndrome. Biol Neonate. 1975; 26(3-4): 241–248. doi:
10.1159/000240735
DCC, as performed in our institution, was associated with 17. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia.
significant reduction in incidence of IVH. DCC in preterm Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more
infants appears to be safe, feasible, and effective with no weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(1): 297–316.
adverse consequences. Our study demonstrates that 18. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD. et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis:
implementation of the DCC process with standardized therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978; 187(1):
1–7.
protocol in preterm infants is feasible and effective with