Principles of Economics
Principles of Economics
Principles of Economics
1. Write an essay on the main purposes of how economics work, and the relations
between the main economic players and institutions.
2. Describe developed, undeveloped and developing Economies.
3. All economies face three fundamental or basic central economic problems. What are
they. Explain.
4. Define price elasticity of demand and explain the formula for calculating price
elasticity?
5. Describe the advantages of a Socialist Economy.
6. Explain the defects of Capitalism.
3.All economies face three fundamental or basic central economic problems. What are
they. Explain.
Fundamental Problems of an Economy
From the investigation of the basic procedures of an economy, doubtlessly some principal issues
emerge whatever the kind of the economy.
An economy exists in view of two fundamental certainties: Firstly, human needs for goods and
services are unlimited; and besides, beneficial assets with which to deliver products and
enterprises are scarce.
Needs being boundless and our assets being restricted, we can't fulfil full scale needs. That being
in this way, an economy needs to choose how to utilize its rare assets to give the most extreme
conceivable fulfilment to the individuals from the general public.
In doing as such, an economy needs to take care of some essential issues called Central
Problems of an economy, which are:
• What to produce.
• How to produce.
• For Whom to produce.
Whatever the type of the economy or economic system, these problems have to be solved
somehow. Whether it is a capitalist economy of the U.S.A. or a socialist economy of the U.S.S.R.
or a mixed economy of India, every economy has to make decisions in regard to what, how and for
whom to produce. These problems are basic and fundamental for all economies. However,
different economies may solve these problems differently. For instance, the socialist economy of
Soviet Russia tackles these problems in a different way from that of capitalist America. We shall
now explain each of the above three problems in some detail.
• What to produce:
The issue 'what to produce' can be isolated into two related inquiries. To start with, which products
are to be delivered and which not; and second, in what amounts those goods, which the economy
has chosen to create, are to be created. In the event that beneficial assets were boundless, we
could deliver the same number of quantities of merchandise as we loved and, thusly, the inquiry
"What products to be created and so forth" would not have emerged. But since assets are in
certainty rare in respect to human needs, an economy must pick among various elective
accumulations of merchandise and ventures that it should deliver.
On the off chance that the Society chooses to create specific goods in a bigger amount, it should
pull back assets from the generation of some different products. Further, an economy needs to
choose how much assets ought to be designated for the creation of purchaser good and how
much for capital products. At the end of the day, an economy needs to choose the individual
amounts of customer merchandise and capital products to be delivered.
The decision between buyer goods and capital products includes the decision between the
present and what's to come. In the event that the general public chooses to deliver more capital
merchandise, a few assets should be detracted from the generation of purchaser products and.
along these lines, the generation of customer products would need to be chopped down. Be that
as it may, more noteworthy measure of capital goods would make conceivable the generation of
bigger amounts of purchaser products later on. Consequently, we see that some present utilization
must be relinquished for more utilization later on.
• How to produce:
The issue of 'how to produce' implies which mix of assets is to be utilized for the generation of
merchandise and which innovation is to be made utilization of underway. When the general public
has chosen what products and ventures are to be delivered and in what amounts, it should then
choose how these goods will be created. There are different elective strategies for creating a
decent and the economy needs to pick among them.
For example, cloth can be produced either with automatic looms or with power looms or with
handlooms. Fields can be irrigated (and hence wheat can be produced) by building small irrigation
works like tube-wells and tanks or by building large canals and dams. Therefore, the economy has
to decide whether cloth is to be produced by handlooms or power looms or automatic looms.
Similarly, it has to decide if the irrigation has to be done by minor irrigation works or by major
works. Obviously, it is a problem of the choice of production techniques.
Different methods or techniques of production would use different quantities of various resources.
For instance, the production of cloth with handloom would make use of more labour and less
capital. Production by handloom is, therefore, called labour-intensive technique of production.
Production of cloth with power loom or automatic loom would utilise less labour and more capital.
Production with power looms is, therefore, called capital-intensive technique of producing cloth.
Thus, the economy has to choose whether it wants to use for production labour-intensive methods
or capital-intensive methods of production.
Obviously, the choice between different methods would depend on the factor-supply situation and
the prices of the factors of production. The criterion, it is obvious, must be the cost of production- It
is well known that the resources are scarce. But some resources are scarcer than others. It is in
society’s interest that those methods of production are employed that make the greatest use of the
relatively plentiful resources or, conversely, economies are much as possible on the relatively
scarce resources.
(iii) For whom to produce:
Once the problems of ‘what’ and ‘how’ to produce are solved, the goods are then produced.
Because the resources and the resulting output of goods are limited, the third basic economic
decision, which must be taken, is ‘for whom to produce’. ‘For whom to produce’ means how the
national product is to be distributed among the members of the society. In other words, for whom
to produce means that should get how much of the total amount of goods and services produced
in the economy.
Thus, the third problem is the problem of sharing of the national product. Distribution of the
national product depends on the distribution of national income. Those people who have larger
incomes would have larger capacity to “buy goods and hence will get greater share of goods and
services
Problems of Efficiency and Growth:
Besides the three fundamental problems explained above, there are two other problems of an
economy to which economists of today attach considerable importance. They are the problems of
efficiency and growth of the economy. Now a word about each of them.
Efficiency of Resource-use:
A very important question that can be asked about the working of an economy is: Are the
resources being used efficiently? Since resources are scarce, it is obviously desirable that they
should be most efficiently used, i.e., the production and distribution of the national product should
be efficient. Production is said to be efficient, if it is not possible to produce more of one good
without reducing the output of any other goods in the economy. Similarly
the distribution is efficient if it is not possible to make any one person/persons better off without
making any other person/persons worse off through any redistribution.
Growth of Productive Capacity:
It is also important to know whether the productive capacity, of an economy is increasing,
static or declining. The increase in productive capacity of an economy over time is called
economic growth. Obviously, for under-developed economies, their basic problem is how to
accelerate the pace of their economic growth.
Even developed countries would not like to rest on their oars. In fact, it has been observed
that they are able to achieve higher annual rate of growth than the under-developed ones. The
problem of growth is thus not peculiar to the under-developed countries, but is of importance to all
countries, whether developed or undeveloped, whether free-market or centrally planned.
Solution of the Fundamental Economic Problems in a Capitalist Economy:
It is the price mechanism that helps in the solution of the fundamental problems of the
economy. Price mechanism means a set of equilibrium price of individual commodities and factors
of production determined through the forces of demand and supply in the various markets.
The main problems, are what to produce, how to produce and for whom to produce. In all
these cases, price is the indicator of the direction of profitable investment. Those commodities will
be produced for which demand prices are high and are therefore profitable to produce; those
techniques or factors of production will be employed which cost less as indicated by the prices of
factors and the commodities will be produced for those sections of the people who have good
incomes and are in a position to pay their price.
Hence, in a free capitalist economy, it is the price mechanism which solves the central
problems of the economy. Price-mechanism establishes an equilibrium price ‘both in the
commodity market and in the factor market. Equilibrium prices in the commodity markets and fact
markets are determined through the forces of demand and supply in the various markets.
4.Define price elasticity of demand and explain the formula for calculating price elasticity?
Price elasticity of demand (PED or Ed) is a measure used in economics to show the
responsiveness, or elasticity, of the quantity demanded of a good or service to a change in its
price, ceteris paribus.
When the price elasticity of demand for a good is relatively inelastic (-1 < Ed < 0), the percentage
change in quantity demanded is smaller than that in price. Hence, when the price is raised, the
total revenue increases, and vice versa.
We could comprehend the connection among interest and cost. Reiterating the dialog quickly, The
Law of Demand expresses that Other things continuing as before the interest for an item
increments when its cost falls and it diminishes when its cost increments. Along these lines as
indicated by the law of interest there is an opposite connection among cost and amount requested,
different things continuing as before. These different things which are thought to be steady are
taste or inclination of the shopper, wage of the purchaser, costs of related merchandise and so on.
If these elements experience a change, at that point the opposite relationship may not hold great.
Anyway, we likewise see that for wares like salt or rice we don't see quite a bit of an adjustment
sought after while in the event of products like Air conditioners, Cars and so on even with a little
change there is significant increment popular. The Law of interest while expressing the connection
among interest and value makes reference to just the course of progress sought after yet does not
make reference to anything about the extent of the change which is extremely fundamental in
basic leadership process for the maker and Government. For instance
"If I lower the price of my product, will the sale increase?"
"If I raise the price, will it affect my profit?"
“If sales tax rate is increased will it have an effect on the revenue collection?"
are questions that need to be answered. This information as to how much or to what extent the
quantity demanded of a good will change as a result of a change in its price is provided by the
concept of Elasticity of Demand.
Elasticity of Demand refers to the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to the changes
in the determinants of demand.
There are mainly three quantifiable determinants of demand: -
1. Price of the Good
2. Income of the Consumer
3. Price of the Related Goods
Types of Elasticity of Demand
As we have seen above there are three quantifiable determinants of demand, hence elasticity of
demand can be of three types
1. Price Elasticity of Demand
2. Income Elasticity of Demand
3. Cross Elasticity of Demand
4. Price elasticity of Demand
Concept of Elasticity of demand Alfred Marshall introduced the concept of elasticity in 1890 to
measure the magnitude of percentage change in the quantity demanded of a commodity to a
certain percentage change in its price or the income of the buyer or in the prices of related goods.
In this section we look at the sensitivity of demand for a product to a change in the product's own
price. Since Price Elasticity of Demand is predominantly used in economic analysis it is
alternatively referred to as Elasticity of Demand. Definition
Price Elasticity of demand is the degree of responsiveness of demand to a change in its price. In
technical terms it is the ratio of the percentage change in demand to the percentage change in
price. Thus,
Ep = Percentage change in quantity demanded/Percentage change in price
In mathematical terms it can be represented as: Ep =(∆q/∆p) (p/q)
From the definition it follows that
1. when percentage change in quantity demanded is greater than the percentage change in
price then, price elasticity will be greater than one and, in this case, demand is said to be elastic.
2. when percentage change in quantity demanded is less than the percentage change in price
then, price elasticity will be less than one and, in this case, demand is said to be inelastic.
3. when percentage change in quantity demanded is equal to the percentage change in price
then price elasticity will be equal to one and in this case, demand is said to be unit elastic.
Since the Elasticity of Demand is less than one Demand is inelastic. In other words, we can say
that for a 14% increase in price, demand has declined only by 4%. The negative sign indicates the
inverse relationship between demand and price.
Diagrammatic representation Of Price Elasticity of Demand