Autophagy: Fasting To Be Healthy: March 2018
Autophagy: Fasting To Be Healthy: March 2018
Autophagy: Fasting To Be Healthy: March 2018
net/publication/323880580
CITATIONS READS
0 139
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mosab Nouraldein Mohammed Hamad on 20 March 2018.
!"#$
%
"
!
&
' &
(
)*!
&
"
"*)+,-!
ϭ
Contents
Subject Page number
Dedication 3
Acknowledgement 4
Introduction 5
Mechanism of autophagy 8
Autophagy and diabetes 16
Autophagy and vitamin D 23
Autophagy and vitamin K 30
The role of autophagy in intracellular 32
pathogens nutrient acquisition
Role of autophagy in cancer 37
Autophagy and apoptosis 45
Autophagy and aging 55
Autophagy and fasting 61
Autophagy and exercise 67
References 72
Ϯ
Dedication
ϯ
Acknowledgement
ϰ
Introduction
Autophagy is an intracellular degradation system that delivers cytoplasmic constituents to the
lysosome. Despite its simplicity, recent progress has demonstrated that autophagy plays a wide
variety of physiological and pathophysiological roles, which are sometimes complex. Autophagy
consists of several sequential steps²sequestration, transport to lysosomes, degradation, and
utilization of degradation products²and each step may exert different function.
This process is quite distinct from endocytosis-mediated lysosomal degradation of extracellular
and plasma membrane proteins. There are three types of autophagy²macroautophagy,
microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy²and the term ³autophagy´ usually
indicates macroautophagy unless otherwise specified.
Autophagy is mediated by a unique organelle called the autophagosome. As autophagosomes
engulf a portion of cytoplasm, autophagy is generally thought to be a nonselective degradation
system. This feature is in marked contrast to the ubiquitin±proteasome system, which specifically
recognizes only ubiquitinated proteins for proteasomal degradation. It is therefore reasonable to
assume that the ubiquitin±proteasome system has numerous specific functions because it can
selectively degrade thousands of substrates.
Recent studies have clearly demonstrated that autophagy has a greater variety of physiological
and pathophysiological roles than expected, such as starvation adaptation, intracellular protein
and organelle clearance, development, anti-aging, elimination of microorganisms, cell death,
tumor suppression, and antigen presentation. Additionally, in some situations, the contribution of
autophagy seems to be very complicated. For example, it is very difficult to generalize the role of
autophagy in cancer and cell death. (1)
Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy), or µself-eating¶, is a conserved cellular pathway that
controls protein and organelle degradation, and has essential roles in survival, development and
homeostasis. Autophagy is also integral to human health and is involved in physiology,
development, lifespan and a wide range of diseases, including cancer, neurodegeneration and
microbial infection. Although research on this topic began in the late 1950s, substantial progress
in the molecular study of autophagy has taken place during only the past 15 years. This review
traces the key findings that led to our current molecular understanding of this complex process.
The term µautophagy¶ comes from the Greek words µphagy¶ meaning eat, and µauto¶ meaning
self. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process in eukaryotes by which cytoplasmic
cargo sequestered inside double-membrane vesicles are delivered to the lysosome for
ϱ
degradation. When autophagy was initially discovered more than 40 years ago, it was perplexing
as to why the cell would self-digest its own components. The simplest hypothesis was that
autophagy serves as a cellular rubbish-disposal mechanism. However, we have since learnt that
this µself-eating¶ process not only rids the cell of intracellular misfolded or long-lived proteins,
superfluous or damaged organelles, and invading microorganisms, but also is an adaptive
response to provide nutrients and energy on exposure to various stresses. Autophagy has been
connected to human pathophysiology, and continued expansion of our knowledge about
autophagy has had implications for fields as wide-ranging as cancer, neurodegeneration, immune
response, development and ageing. This timeline reviews the history of autophagy research with
a focus on the key events that occurred over the past 15 years, when our molecular understanding
of this process first began.
History of autophagy
More than four decades ago, Clark and Novikoff observed mitochondria from mouse kidneys
within membrane-bound compartments termed µdense bodies¶, which were subsequently shown
to include lysosomal enzymes. Ashford and Porter later observed membrane-bound vesicles
containing semi-digested mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum in the hepatocytes of rats that
had been exposed to glucagon, and Novikoff and Essner observed that the same bodies contained
lysosomal hydrolases. One year later, in 1963, at the Ciba Foundation symposium on lysosomes,
de Duve founded the field when he coined the term µautophagy¶ to describe the presence of
single- or double-membrane vesicles that contain parts of the cytoplasm and organelles in
various states of disintegration. He pointed out that these sequestering vesicles, or
µautophagosomes¶, were related to lysosomes and occurred in normal cells. The origin of the
membrane surrounding the autophagosome is still controversial; de Duve suggested that the
sequestering membranes are derived from preformed membranes, such as smooth endoplasmic
reticulum.
Cellular autophagy is observed in normal rat liver cells, but is enhanced in the livers of starved
animals6, and in 1967 de Duve and Deter confirmed that glucagon induces autophagy. Ten years
later, Pfeifer demonstrated the converse ² that insulin inhibits autophagy. Pioneering work by
Mortimore and Schworer further demonstrated that amino acids, which are the end products of
autophagic degradation, have an inhibitory effect on autophagy in rat liver cells. These early
lines of evidence are consistent with our current understanding of autophagy as an adaptive
catabolic and energy-generating process. Subsequently, Seglen and Gordon carried out the first
biochemical analysis of autophagy and identified the pharmacological reagent 3-methyladenine
as an autophagy inhibitor; they also provided the first evidence that protein kinases and
phosphatases can regulate autophagy.
These early studies of autophagy from the 1950s to the early 1980s were based on morphological
analyses. de Duve and others primarily examined the terminal stages of the process, the steps just
before or after fusion with the lysosome. Subsequent studies by Seglen's laboratory began to use
electro-injected radioactive probes to examine the early and intermediate steps of autophagy,
leading to the identification of the phagophore (the initial sequestering vesicle that develops into
ϲ
the autophagosome), as well as the amphisome (a non-lysosomal vesicle formed by the fusion of
autophagosomes and endosomes).
As early as the 1960s, de Duve suggested that most, if not all, living cells must employ a
mechanism for nonspecific bulk segregation and digestion of portions of their own cytoplasm in
the lysosome5, but also hinted at the need of a selective proteolytic mechanism acting on
abnormal cellular proteins or organelles. In 1973, Bolender and Weibel provided some of the
first evidence that a specific organelle (the smooth endoplasmic reticulum) can be engulfed by
autophagy. Four years later, Beaulaton and Lockshin suggested that mitochondria are selectively
cleared during insect metamorphosis. In 1983, Veenhuis demonstrated that superfluous
peroxisomes are selectively degraded by autophagy in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha15, and
five years later Lemasters and colleagues showed that changes in mitochondrial membrane
potential lead to the onset of autophagy16. Further evidence that autophagy can be selective was
provided by subsequent studies in yeast and higher eukaryotes. (2)
ϳ
Mechanism of autophagy
The term µautophagy¶, derived from the Greek meaning µeating of self¶, was first coined by
Christian de Duve over 40 years ago, and was largely based on the observed degradation of
mitochondria and other intra-cellular structures within lysosomes of rat liver perfused with the
pancreatic hormone, glucagon. The mechanism of glucagon-induced autophagy in the liver is
still not fully understood at the molecular level, other than that it requires cyclic AMP induced
activation of protein kinase-A and is highly tissue-specific. In recent years the scientific world
has µrediscovered¶ autophagy, with major contributions to our molecular understanding and
appreciation of the physiological significance of this process coming from numerous
laboratories. Although the importance of autophagy is well recognized in mammalian systems,
many of the mechanistic breakthroughs in delineating how autophagy is regulated and executed
at the molecular level have been made in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Currently, 32
different autophagy-related genes (Atg) have been identified by genetic screening in yeast and,
significantly, many of these genes are conserved in slime mould, plants, worms, flies and
mammals, emphasizing the importance of the autophagic process in responses to starvation
across phylogeny.
There are three defined types of autophagy: macro-autophagy, micro-autophagy, and chaperone-
mediated autophagy, all of which promote proteolytic degradation of cytosolic components at the
lysosome. Macro-autophagy delivers cytoplasmic cargo to the lysosome through the
intermediary of a double membrane-bound vesicle, referred to as an autophagosome that fuses
with the lysosome to form an autolysosome. In micro-autophagy, by contrast, cytosolic
components are directly taken up by the lysosome itself through invagination of the lysosomal
membrane. Both macro-and micro-autophagy are able to engulf large structures through both
selective and non-selective mechanisms. In chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), targeted
proteins are translocated across the lysosomal membrane in a complex with chaperone proteins
(such as Hsc-70) that are recognized by the lysosomal membrane receptor lysosomal-associated
membrane protein 2A (LAMP-2A), resulting in their unfolding and degradation. Due to recent
and increased interest specifically in macroautophagy and its role in disease, this review focuses
on molecular and cellular aspects of macro-autophagy (henceforth referred to as µautophagy¶)
and how it is regulated under both healthy and pathological conditions.
ϴ
ϵ
Additional regulatory proteins complex with Vps34 and Beclin-1 at the ER and nucleated
phagophore to either promote autophagy, such as UVRAG, BIF-1, Atg14L and Ambra, or to
inhibit autophagy, such as Rubicon and Bcl-2. Like Beclin-1, UVRAG has been shown to be
mono-allelically deleted in human cancer. The precise subunit composition of complexes at the
ER containing Vps34 and Beclin-1 is determined by signalling events in the cell that remain to
be fully elucidated but, in many instances, are sensitive to nutrient availability in the
microenvironment. One well-characterized regulatory event is the interaction of Beclin-1 with
Bcl-2, which disrupts the interaction of Beclin-1 with Vps34. Thus, Beclin-1 activity in
autophagy is inhibited by interaction with Bcl-2 (and Bcl-XL) at the ER. This interaction is
mediated by the BH3 domain in Beclin-1 and disrupted by Jnk1-mediated phosphorylation of
Bcl-2 in response to starvation-induced signalling, thereby allowing autophagy to proceed.
Thus, Bcl-2 plays a dual role in determining cell viability that may depend on its subcellular
localization: (a) a pro-survival function at mitochondria inhibiting cytochrome c release, thereby
blocking apoptosis; and (b) an autophagy-inhibitory activity at the ER, mediated by interaction
with Beclin1 that can lead to non-apoptotic cell death. The crosstalk between autophagy and
apoptosis extends beyond the regulation of Beclin1 and Bcl-2. For example, calpain-mediated
cleavage of Atg5 blocked its activity in autophagy, caused it to translocate to the mitochondria,
where its interaction with Bcl-XL resulted in cytochrome c release, caspase activation and
apoptosis. How the balance between autophagy and apoptosis is determined in the cellular
response to specific stresses is a research area of extreme interest given its relevance for disease
progression and treatment, but again is an area that is not resolved.
Atg5±Atg12 conjugation
There are two ubiquitin-like systems that are key to autophagy acting at the Atg5±Atg12
conjugation step and at the LC3 processing step (see below). In the first of these systems, Atg7
ϭϬ
ϭϭ
In general, autophagy has been viewed as a random process because it appears to engulf cytosol
indiscriminately. Electron micrographs frequently show autophagosomes with varied contents,
including mitochondria, ER and Golgi membranes. However, there is accumulating evidence that
the growing phagophore membrane can interact selectively with protein aggregates and
organelles. It is proposed that LC3B-II, acting as a µreceptor¶ at the phagophore, interacts with
µadaptor¶ molecules on the target (e.g. protein aggregates, mitochondria) to promote their
selective uptake and degradation. The best-characterized molecule in this regard is
p62/SQSTM1, a multi-functional adaptor molecule that promotes turnover of poly-ubiquitinated
protein aggregates. Mutation of p62/SQSTM1 is linked to Paget's disease, in which abnormal
turnover of bone results in bone deformation, arthritis and nerve injury. Osteoclasts in such
individuals show deregulated NF-ț%VLJQDOOLQJDQGDFFXPXODWLRQRIXELTXLWLQDWHGSURWHLQV
consistent with a key role for autophagy in normal bone development and function. Other
molecules, such as NBR1, function similarly to p62/SQSTM1 in promoting turnover of
ubiquitinated proteins, while in yeast, Uth1p and Atg32 have been identified as proteins that
promote selective uptake of mitochondria, a process known as mitophagy.
Fusion with the lysosome:
When the autophagosome completes fusion of the expanding ends of the phagophore membrane,
the next step towards maturation in this self-degradative process is fusion of the autophagosome
with the specialized endosomal compartment that is the lysosome to form the µautolysosome¶.
It has been variously suggested that fusion of the autophagosome with early and late endosomes,
prior to fusion with the lysosome, both delivers cargo and also delivers components of the
membrane fusion machinery and lowers the pH of the autophagic vesicle before delivery of
lysosomal acid proteases. This aspect of the process is relatively understudied but requires the
small G protein Rab7 in its GTP-bound state, and also the Presenilin protein that is implicated in
Alzheimer's disease. The cytoskeleton also plays a role in autolysosome formation, since agents
such as nocadazole, which are microtubule poisons, block fusion of the autophagosome with the
lysosome. Within the lysosome, cathepsin proteases B and D are required for turnover of
autophagosomes and, by inference, for the maturation of the autolysosome. Lamp-1 and Lamp-2
at the lysosome are also critical for functional autophagy, as evidenced by the inhibitory effect of
targeted deletion of these proteins in mice on autolysosome maturation. Interestingly,
inactivation of LAMP-2 is the causative genetic lesion associated with Danon disease in humans,
an X-linked condition that causes cardiomyocyte hyper-trophy and accumulation of
autophagosomes in heart muscle. Similar cardiac defects are observed in Lamp-2-null mice, as
well as skeletal abnormalities and periodontitis associated with inflammation arising from a
failure to eliminate intracellular pathogens in the oral mucosa.
Atg5/Atg7-independent autophagy:
Although Atg5- and Atg7-dependent autophagy has been shown to be critical for survival during
the starvation period in the first few days immediately following birth, recent evidence has
identified an alternative Atg5/Atg7-independent pathway of autophagy. This pathway of
autophagy was not associated with LC3 processing but appeared to specifically involve
ϭϮ
Selective autophagy:
Here, we focus in more depth on selective autophagy, given its significance for neuropathies,
cancer and heart disease. As briefly mentioned above, p62/SQSTM1 associates with
polyubiquitinated proteins and aggregates through its ubiquitin-binding domain (UBD), with
LC3B-II through its LC3-interacting Region (LIR), but also regulates NF-ț%VLJQDOOLQJWKURugh
interaction with Traf-6. When autophagy is defective, as in mice with targeted deletion of Atg7 ,
p62-associated poly-ubiquitinated aggregates accumulated in cells and the combined knockout of
Atg7 and p62 was observed to µrescue¶ the accumulation of these aberrant cytosolic inclusions.
p62 is the major constituent of Mallory bodies in the liver that accumulate in human
hepatocellular carcinoma, where recent work indicates that elevated p62 levels play an active
role in deregulating NF-ț%VLJQDOOLQJDQGLQGXFLQJLQIODPPDWLRQ-associated tumorigenesis.
Intracellular aggregate accumulation plays a particularly significant role in the etiology of
neurodegenerative diseases, including dementia, Alzheimer's, Huntington's, Parkinson's and
Creutzfeldt±Jakob/prion diseases. For example, polyglutamine-expansion repeats, as seen in
PXWDQWKXQWLQJWLQ+XQWLQJWRQ
VGLVHDVHPXWDQWIRUPVRIĮ-synuclein (familial Parkinson's
disease) and different forms of tau (Alzheimer's disease) are dependent on autophagy for their
clearance from neurons. Consistently, neuronal-specific inactivation of the key autophagy genes
Atg5 or Atg7 results in intracellular aggregate accumulation and neurodegeneration in mice. This
relatively recent link between autophagy and neuropathies has prompted interested in the
development of autophagy-inducing drugs to treat these debilitating diseases.
Autophagy-dependent degradation of mitochondria, termed mitophagy, is important for
maintaining the integrity of these critical organelles and limiting the production of reactive
oxygen species. The first protein identified to be involved in mitophagy was Uth1p, a yeast
protein that is required for mitochondrial clearance by autophagy, but it is unknown how Uth1
interacts with the autophagosome and mediates mitophagy, and there are no known mammalian
homologues. More recently, Atg32, a mitochondria-anchored protein, was found to be required
for mitophagy in yeast, where it functions through interaction with Atg8 and Atg11, suggesting
that it functions as a mitochondrial receptor for mitophagy. Atg32, like Uth1, has no known
homologues in mammals, but contains an amino acid motif, WXXI, that is required for
interaction with Atg8 and Atg11 and is conserved in the LIR of p62. Other molecules that are
implicated in mitophagy are BNIP3L, which is involved in mitochondrial clearance in
differentiating red blood cells, Ulk-1, which is the mammalian homologue of Atg1, and Parkin,
encoded by a gene that is genetically linked to Parkinson's disease. Parkin is an E3 ubiquitin
ligase that is located at the outer mitochondrial membrane, suggesting that key molecules at the
ϭϯ
ϭϰ
are likely mediated through TOR inhibition downstream of AMPK, REDD1 and Tsc1/Tsc2.
Given that hypoxia induces ER stress through the unfolded protein response, and that
mitochondria have reduced function in oxidative phosphorylation under hypoxia, the induction
of autophagy may allow the cell to eliminate portions of compacted ER and to reduce
mitochondrial mass at a time when oxygen is not available to accept free electrons from the
respiratory chain. This adaptive response to hypoxia would prevent wasteful ATP consumption
at the ER and limit production of reactive oxygen species at the mitochondria. Increased
autophagy would also allow the cell to generate ATP from catabolism at a time when ATP
production by oxidative phosphorylation is limited.
Specific HIF targets in autophagy include BNIP3 and BNIP3L that are non-canonical members
of the Bcl-2 superfamily of cell death regulators. Although linked to cell death, the normal
function of these proteins appears to be in mitophagy. As discussed, BNIP3L/NIX plays a
physiological role in mitochondrial clearance from maturing reticulocytes, while BNIP3 has a
similar role in cardiac and skeletal muscle in response to oxidative stress. The extent to which
BNIP3 and BNIP3L are functionally redundant is not resolved and differential regulation of their
expression may explain aspects of their non-redundancy in vivo. Various models have been
proposed to explain how BNIP3/BNIP3L function in mitophagy, including a role for BNIP3 in
derepressing Beclin-1 through disruption of its interaction with Bcl-2. However, a more direct
role for BNIP3L in promoting mitochondrial clearance through interaction with the LC3-related
molecule GABARAP has also been demonstrated, while BNIP3 interacts with Rheb, suggesting
an additional indirect role in hypoxia-induced autophagy.
Autophagy is known to induce cell cycle arrest and, while it appears that this may be largely
driven by nutrient deprivation-induced inhibition of TOR activity and downstream effects on
translation of key cell cycle genes, such as cyclin D1, it is not clear whether autophagy can
induce cell cycle arrest independent of TOR signalling. This is an area of research that will likely
be of increased interest moving forward, given its importance to understanding how and at what
stages autophagy acts in tumour progression. (3)
ϭϱ
ϭϲ
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin resistance and failure of pancreatic beta-cells
producing insulin. Mitochondrial dysfunction may play a role in both processes of diabetes.
Autophagy maintains cellular homeostasis through degradation and recycling of organelles such
as mitochondria. As dysfunctional mitochondria are the main organelles removed by autophagy,
we studied the role of autophagy in diabetes using mice with beta-cell-specific deletion of the
Atg7 gene. Atg7-mutant mice showed reduction in beta-cell mass and pancreatic insulin content.
Electron microscopy showed swollen mitochondria and other Ultrastructural changes in
autophagy-deficient beta-cells. Insulin secretory function ex vivo was also impaired. As a result,
Atg7-mutant mice showed hypoinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. These results suggest that
autophagy is necessary to maintain structure, mass, and function of beta-cells. Besides its effect
on beta-cells, autophagy may affect insulin sensitivity because mitochondrial dysfunction has
been implicated in insulin resistance and autophagy is involved in the maintenance of the
organelles. Furthermore, since aging is associated with impaired glucose tolerance, decline of
autophagic activity may be involved in age-associated reduction of glucose tolerance. (6)
$XWRSKDJ\LQGLDEHWHVȕ-cell dysfunction, insulin resistance, and complications:
Autophagy functions to degrade and recycle intracellular proteins and damaged organelles,
maintaining the normal cellular function. Autophagy has been shown to play an important role in
UHJXODWLQJQRUPDOIXQFWLRQRISDQFUHDWLFȕFHOOVDQGLQVXOLQ-target tissues, such as skeletal
muscle, liver, and adipose tissue. Enhanced autophagy also acts as a protective mechanism
against oxidative stress in these tissues. Altered autophagic activity has been implicated in the
SURJUHVVLRQRIREHVLW\WRW\SHGLDEHWHVWKURXJKLPSDLUHGȕ-cell function and development of
LQVXOLQUHVLVWDQFH,QWKLVUHYLHZZHRXWOLQHWKHQRUPDOUHJXODWLRQRIDXWRSKDJ\LQȕFHOOVDQG
insulin target tissues and explore the dysregulation of autophagy in diabetic animal models and
human subjects with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, we highlight the role of impaired autophagy
in the pathophysiology of diabetic complications, including nephropathy and cardiomyopathy.
Finally, we summarize how autophagy might be targeted as a therapeutic option in type 2
diabetes. (7)
The Role of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Nephropathy:
Diabetic nephropathy is a leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. The multipronged
drug approach targeting blood pressure and serum levels of glucose, insulin, and lipids fails to
fully prevent the onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Therefore, a new therapeutic
target to combat diabetic nephropathy is required. Autophagy is a catabolic process that degrades
damaged proteins and organelles in mammalian cells and plays a critical role in maintaining
cellular homeostasis. The accumulation of proteins and organelles damaged by hyperglycemia
and other diabetes-related metabolic changes is highly associated with the development of
diabetic nephropathy. Recent studies have suggested that autophagy activity is altered in both
podocytes and proximal tubular cells under diabetic conditions. Autophagy activity is regulated
by both nutrient state and intracellular stresses. Under diabetic conditions, an altered nutritional
state due to nutrient excess may interfere with the autophagic response stimulated by
intracellular stresses, leading to exacerbation of organelle dysfunction and diabetic nephropathy.
In this review, we discuss new findings showing the relationships between autophagy and
ϭϳ
diabetic nephropathy and suggest the therapeutic potential of autophagy in diabetic nephropathy.
(8)
ϭϴ
increased, but CTSD was decreased and very few lysosomes were detected ultrastructurally,
despite the abundance of autophagic vacuoles. AMPK activity was suppressed and ATP content
was reduced in type 2 diabetic hearts. These findings suggest the autophagic process is
suppressed at the final digestion step in type 2 diabetic hearts. Resveratrol, an autophagy
enhancer, mitigated diastolic dysfunction, while chloroquine had the opposite effects in type 2
diabetic hearts. Autophagy in the heart is enhanced in type 1 diabetes, but is suppressed in type 2
diabetes. This difference provides important insight into the pathophysiology of diabetic
cardiomyopathy, which is essential for the development of new treatment strategies. (11)
The Effects of Autophagy on Diabetic Cardiomyopathy:
Diabetes is a major predictor of heart failure. However, little is known regarding mechanisms
how it causes cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prolonged
exposure of cardiomyocytes to high glucose concentrations induces autophagy. For in vitro
study, H9c2 cells were cultured with high glucose for 3 days. Cell viability was determined by
trypan blue assay. Autophagic vacuoles were detected by MDC staining as well as immunoblot.
For in vivo study, diabetes mellitus was induced by streptozotocin, 60mg/kg of body weight,
intraperitoneally at 4-week-age in SD rats. Body weight and blood glucose level were monitored
and sacrificed at 2 and 5 weeks. Deprived glucose as well as high glucose within medium
induced a significant decrease of cell viability at 72hr. The conversion ratio of LC3 was
significantly increased by high glucose at the same time. However, glucose deprivation
dramatically converts LC3| to LC3|| at 12hr. Diabetic rats have shown the reduction of size of
LV with growth retardation (p<.05) and higher level of LC3 protein expression, suggesting that
autophagy was activated. Taken together, in vitro findings indicate that hyperglycemic oxidative
stress is inducible to autophagy. In vivo studies show progression of pathological remodeling of
heart development is associated with autophagy. Thereby, there might be potential role of
autophagy in pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyocytes. (12)
Autophagy and mitophagy in diabetic cardiomyopathy:
Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a heart muscle-specific disease that increases the risk of heart failure
and mortality in diabetic patients independent of vascular pathology. Mitochondria are cellular
power plants that generate energy for heart contraction and concurrently produce reactive oxygen
species that, if unchecked, may damage the mitochondria and the heart. Elimination of damaged
mitochondria by autophagy known as mitophagy is an essential process for maintaining normal
cardiac function at baseline and in response to various stress and disease conditions.
Mitochondrial structural injury and functional impairment have been shown to contribute to
diabetic heart disease. Recent studies have demonstrated an inhibited autophagic flux in the
hearts of diabetic animals. Surprisingly, the diminished autophagy appears to be an adaptive
response that protects against cardiac injury in type 1 diabetes. This raises several questions
regarding the relationship between general autophagy and selective mitophagy in the diabetic
heart. However, autophagy may play a different role in the hearts of type 2 diabetic animals. In
this review, we will summarize current knowledge in this field and discuss the potential
functional roles of autophagy and mitophagy in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
ϭϵ
This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Autophagy and protein quality control in
cardiometabolic diseases. (13)
Cardiac Autophagy in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy:
Autophagy is a process for bulk degradation and recycling of cytoplasmic components in
lysosomes. A low level of constitutive autophagy is cytoprotective by maintaining the quality of
proteins and organelles. It allows recycling of amino acids and removal of damaged organelles to
eliminate oxidative stress and promote remodeling for survival. In the heart, autophagy plays an
important role in cytoplasmic quality control and cardiac homeostasis under physiological and
pathological conditions. Down-regulation of autophagy would cause abnormal proteins and
organelles to accumulate, leading to apoptosis and cardiac dysfunction, the pathologies seen in
diseases such as myocardial hypertrophy, cardiomyopathy, and ischemic heart disease. However,
excessive induction of autophagy may destroy the cytosol and organelles and release apoptosis
related factors, triggering cardiomyocyte death and impairing cardiac function. Thus, there is
ongoing debate about whether up-regulated autophagy is the cause of cardiomyocyte death or
whether it is actually an attempt to protect cells against cardiac stress conditions, including
diabetes and ischemic heart disease.
Suppression of Cardiac Autophagy in Type 1 Diabetes:
Recently, we have established the role of autophagy in the development of diabetic
cardiomyopathy in type 1 diabetic animal models. At six months of age, OVE26 mice, an
established type 1 diabetic mouse model generated through targeted overexpression of
FDOPRGXOLQLQȕFHOOH[KLELWYHU\KLJKEORRGJOXFRVHFRQFHQWUDWLRQVUHGXFHGVHUXPLQVXOLQ
values, and elevated serum triglyceride levels, and they also exhibit cardiomyopathy
characterized by clear morphological abnormalities and impaired cardiac performance. Evidence
for diabetes-induced suppression of autophagic activity is uncovered by western blotting and
electron microscopy, which demonstrate that diabetes decreases accumulation of lipidated
microtubule-associated protein1 light chain 3 (LC3-II) and autophagosome formation in the
heart. Moreover, streptozotocin (STZ) - induced diabetes also suppresses cardiac autophagy and
impairs cardiac function.
Mechanistically, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity is significantly inhibited in
diabetic OVE26 mice, chronic activation of AMPK by metformin restores cardiac autophagy in
wild type diabetic hearts, but this effect is abolished in mLFHGHILFLHQWRI$03.ĮLQGLFDWLQJ
that AMPK regulates cardiac autophagy in diabetic cardiomyopathy. In addition, Diabetic hearts
display activation of the tuberous sclerosis complex mammalian target of rapamycin
(TSCmTOR) signaling pathway, as reflected by decreased phosphorylation of raptor, as well as
increased phosphorylation of mTOR and its downstream effectors, 4 E binding protein 1
(4EBP1) and p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (p70 S6K1). Activation of AMPK by metformin
inhibits the TSC-mTOR pathway and restores cardiac autophagy in OVE26 mice. Finally, we
demonstrate that AMPK activation attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy through regulation of the
switch between autophagy and apoptotic machinery (He C, et al. [3] unpublished data). This
effect is attributable to c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-mediated Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2)
ϮϬ
Ϯϭ
ϮϮ
Vitamin D deficiency is a critical factor in the pathology of at least 17 varieties of cancer, as well
as autoimmune diseases, diabetes, osteoarthritis, periodontal disease, and more. Vitamin D
receptor (VDR) is a nuclear receptor that mediates most biological functions of vitamin D3, the
active form of vitamin D. Activation of VDR signaling affects many processes, including
calcium metabolism, apoptosis, immunity, and autophagy. Autophagy influences various aspects
of disease progression, including stress adaptation, lifespan extension, development, immunity,
and cancer. There is increasing concern regarding the use of vitamin D as a cheap and
convenient supplement for disease prevention.
Vitamin D and VDR:
There are two biologically relevant forms of vitamin D. One is ergocalciferol, or vitamin D2, and
the other is cholecalciferol, or vitamin D3. The enzyme 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-
hydroxylase, which catalyzes 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 into 1, 25(OH) 2D3, is critical to the
production of the active form of vitamin D. After being taken up by target cells, vitamin D3
binds to its cognate receptor, VDR.
VDR is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. In mammals, VDR is highly expressed in
metabolic tissues, such as intestine, kidney, skin, and thyroid gland, and moderately expressed in
nearly all tissues. Moreover, VDR is expressed in many malignant tissues. Active VDR binds to
vitamin D response elements (VDREs) located in promoter regions of target genes, thereby
controlling the transcription of these genes. VDR affects the transcription of at least 913 genes in
human SCC25 cells (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line). The impacted biological
processes range from calcium metabolism to the expression of key antimicrobial peptides.
Therefore, it is not surprising that vitamin D3/VDR signaling is involved in mineral and bone
homeostasis, modulation of growth, cardiovascular processes, cancer prevention, and regulation
of immune responses, including autophagy. Dysfunction of VDR and vitamin D3 deficiency can
cause poor bone development and health, as well as increase the risk of many chronic diseases,
including type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn¶s disease, infectious diseases, and cancer.
Autophagy;
Ϯϯ
The housekeeping function of autophagy is to maintain cellular energy levels and cell survival by
recycling amino acids and fatty acids during periods of metabolic stress. Moreover, autophagy
protects the cell by degrading damaged proteins and organelles as well as intracellular pathogens.
The functions of autophagy include tumor suppression, antimicrobial defense, and inhibition of
cardiac hypertrophy, anti-aging, and others. Remarkably, the functions of autophagy overlap
with those of the vitamin D/VDR signaling.
Pathways Involved in Vitamin D3-associated Autophagy:
Autophagy can be induced by cellular stress, including starvation, hypoxia, biologic agents, and
chemicals. Some studies have reported autophagy induced by vitamin D3 and its analogs in
human myeloid leukemia cells, macrophages, breast cancer cells, and head and neck squamous
cancer cells. The signaling pathways regulated by vitamin D3 include Bcl-2, beclin-1,
mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex
(PI3KC3), cathelicidin, calcium metabolism, and cyclin-dependent kinase. These pathways are
critical in host defense and inflammatory responses. Hence, vitamin D3 and autophagy are
associated with innate immunity, inflammatory bowel diseases, infection, and cancer.
1. Vitamin D3 increases free cytosolic calcium and decreases mTOR induction in
autophagy:Vitamin D3 is a major regulator of calcium metabolism. Increased circulating
vitamin D3 activates VDR, leading to increased intestinal calcium absorption. In
excitable cells such as neurons, calcium is released from the sarcoplasmic or endoplasmic
reticulum (ER) to activate calcium-dependent kinases and phosphatases, thereby
regulating numerous cellular processes, including autophagy. ER calcium induces
autophagy when stimulated by vitamin D3. This process is inhibited by mTOR, a
negative regulator of macroautophagy, and induces massive accumulation of
autophagosomes in a beclin-1- and ATG7-dependent manner since they are not fused
with lysosomes. Vitamin D3 can down-regulate the expression of mTOR protein, thus
inducing autophagy by inhibiting the mTORC1 complex.
Ϯϰ
The Bcl-2 family also regulates autophagy. Vitamin D3 and vitamin D analogs
significantly induced the expression of Bcl-2 in psoriasis.
Vitamin D3 protected HL60 cells against apoptosis but down-regulated the expression of
the Bcl-2 gene also vitamin D3-induced apoptosis of Y79 cells was accompanied by a
reduction of Bcl-2 and increase of Bax protein.Bcl-2 inhibits autophagy by repressing
calcium signals, depending on Bcl-2¶s location. Bcl-2 inhibits autophagy only when Bcl-
2 resides in the ER, where it has been suggested to regulate cellular Ca2+ homeostasis.
2. Vitamin D3 regulates nucleation through beclin-1 and PI3KC3:
Beclin-1 sits at the core of autophagy regulation. It is a key component of the PI3KC3
complex, which is important for the localization of autophagic proteins to a pre-
autophagosomal structure. Beclin-1 is regulated by many factors, such as Bcl-2, NF-ț%,
vitamin D3, and vitamin D3 analogs. Inhibition of the VDR target gene cathelicidin
significantly weakens vitamin D3-enhanced beclin-1 expression and vitamin D3-induced
autophagy. However, the mechanism by which vitamin D3 increases beclin-1 expression
remains unclear.
Vitamin D3 can also increase beclin-1 expression through Bcl-2. Beclin-1 is a Bcl-2-
homology-3 (BH3)-only protein. Bcl-2 binds directly to a BH3 domain in beclin-1,
inhibiting beclin-1 and consequently autophagy. Silencing of endogenous Bcl-2 increases
the level of starvation-induced autophagy, possibly due to the release of beclin-1 from the
Bcl-2-beclin-1 complex, allowing a sufficient amount of beclin-1 to be recruited to bind
to PI3KC3.
Besides its effects on beclin-1, vitamin D3 signaling activates PI3K signaling pathway to
induce autophagy. PI3K represents a family of kinases that phosphorylate the 3-hydroxyl
group in phosphatidylinositol inositides .Vitamin D3 activates the PI3K pathway in THP-
1 cells, enhances the expression of beclin-1, and induces the expression of PI3KC3 in
leukemia cells.
Ϯϱ
Ϯϲ
Ϯϳ
On the other hand, vitamin D3 signaling may decrease autophagy through different
mechanisms, especially under certain stresses. Vitamin D3 may decrease the level of
NF-ț%71)-ĮRU,FN-ȖWKXVGHFUHDVLQJDXWRSKDJ\,QDGGLWLRQYLWDPLQ'
increases the level of p19INK4D, which protects cells from autophagy-induced death.
Ϯϴ
Ϯϵ
ϯϬ
studied previously, which suggested slight MK4-induced cell growth inhibition via apoptosis
induction and cell cycle arrest. On the contrary, histopathological findings showed a large
number of cells containing vacuoles in their cytoplasm, and electron microscopic findings
showed a large number of cytoplasmic autophagosomes and autolysosomes. These findings
suggested evidence of autophagy-related cell death. Fluorescence microscopy following acridine
orange staining revealed an increase in the number of cytoplasmic acidic vesicular organelles
characteristic of autophagy. Moreover, there were few cells forming autophagic vesicles in the
control group, while the percentage of cells containing vacuoles in the MK4-treated group
increased with the duration of culture. These results suggested that, unlike in leukemia, gastric
cancer, HCC, and other cancer cells, the antitumor effects of MK4 on CCC cells are induced via
autophagy formation. (18)
ϯϭ
Food and reproduction are basic necessities for life. Intracellular pathogens infect host cells and
are dependent on them for nutrients to propagate. While there is an abundance of food inside
host cells, molecules are mostly sequestered in complex compounds or structures such as
glycogen, lipid droplets, and proteins; forms that are not readily usable by microbial intruders.
Therefore, simply gaining access to the interior of a host cell and avoiding potent innate
antimicrobial host defenses is not sufficient to guarantee successful occupation and growth. Once
inside, pathogens must either stimulate host cell import of metabolites or degrade intracellular
storage molecules into compounds that can be transported and metabolized. There are multiple
mechanisms by which intracellular pathogens accomplish this goal. For example,
Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes proteins to degrade host-derived lipids, such as cholesterol,
for a carbon source. Pathogens can also take advantage of host signaling pathways to acquire
nutrients. Both Brucella abortus and Salmonella enterica thrive on the increased glucose that is
imported upon activation of various peroxisome proliferation-activated receptors (PPARs) in
alternatively activated monocytes. Recently, several pathogens have been demonstrated to
exploit host cell macroautophagy for nutrients. Autophagy is a critical mechanism that host cells
use to increase nutrient availability when stressed. Since infection should exert a wide range of
stresses on cells, it is not surprising that a diverse range of microbes have evolved strategies to
extract the products of autophagy.
Autophagy is a highly conserved, multi-faceted eukaryotic process that maintains cellular
homeostasis by degrading cytosolic material. Autophagy was noted as early as 1957 during the
characterization of kidney cells by transmission electron microscopy (Clark, 1957, Deter and de
Duve, 1967). In 1964, autophagy was identified as a mechanism to degrade cytosolic
components and mitochondria under starvation conditions (Malkoff and Buetow, 1964). Since
then, autophagy has been linked to a wide range of functions including antigen presentation
through major histocompatibility complex II (MHC-II), unconventional secretion of
inflammatory mediators, and cell viability.
Autophagy is divided into several subsets based on the components being degraded. Bulk
autophagy refers to non-specific cytoplasmic turnover while selective autophagy refers to
autophagic degradation of specific structures. There are several distinct types of selective
autophagy, which target specific cellular components such as mitochondria (mitophagy) or lipids
(lipophagy). During infections, intracellular microbes are recognized, targeted, and degraded
through a form of selective autophagy termed xenophagy. Although xenophagy is efficient at
destroying microbes that enter the cytosol, intracellular pathogens have developed numerous
evasion strategies to avoid destruction by xenophagy, including the degradation or inhibition of
autophagy components, camouflaging itself in host proteins, or blocking autophagosome
maturation.
ϯϮ
Several pathogens that evade xenophagic killing have incorporated autophagy into their
intracellular life cycle. These microbes exploit autophagy to sustain host cell viability, increase
nutrient production, and/or for non-lytic exocytosis. Viruses also use autophagy or autophagy
components for viral assembly and maturation.
Pathogens induce xenophagy
During infections, intracellular microbes are recognized, targeted, and degraded through a form
of selective autophagy termed xenophagy. Inhibition of mTOR induces xenophagy in response to
extracellular or phagocytosed microbes through Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs recognize
conserved microbial factors and initiate several anti-microbial processes, including xenophagy
via Myd88 and Trif interacting with Beclin 1. Cell to cell signaling can also induce autophagy.
Interferon gamma (IFN-ȖDFWLYDWHVDXWRSKDJ\WKURXJK,5*0LQKXPDQFHOOVZKLOH&'
ligation stimulates autophagy through PI3K and Rab7; priming cells to resist microbes.
After phagocytosis, many pathogens escape the phagosome to replicate within the cytosol. The
host cell mounts a xenophagic response to the membrane damage that occurs during phagosomal
escape. Once microbes reach the cytosol, they can be targeted for xenophagy through immune
surveillance or by causing cell stress. Several molecules, such as Nod-1 and Nod-2, identify
microbial components within the cytosol to target microbes for xenophagy. Nod-1 and Nod-2
induce xenophagy and microbial antigen processing in response to bacterial peptidoglycan.
Microbes also induce xenophagy through a number of cell stress mechanisms. B. abortus
secreted TcpB induces endoplasmic reticulum stress via the unfolded protein response (UPR)
pathway while Toxoplasma gondii increases intracellular calcium levels to induce autophagy.
Lastly, xenophagy can also be directly induced by microbial proteins. For example, Shigella
flexneri exported VirG polymerizes actin to propel the bacteria through the cytosol. ATG5 binds
to VirG and initiates autophagosome formation without upstream autophagy signaling. However,
S. flexneri also produces IcsB which blocks ATG5 from binding to VirG, thus inhibiting
xenophagy. Likewise, the viral protein NS4B in Hepatitis C virus (HCV) induces autophagy by
interacting with a Rab5/Beclin 1/VPS34 complex.
Pathogens have evolved complex xenophagy evasion mechanisms
Xenophagy is typically extremely effective at destroying microbes that enter the cytosol. For
example, some serotypes of Group A Streptococcus (GAS) invade host cells, escape into the
cytosol, and are then destroyed by xenophagy. Xenophagy effectively blocks these serotypes
from using the cytosol as a replicative niche. To defend themselves, most intracellular pathogens
have evolved mechanisms to either inhibit or evade xenophagy. Some GAS serotypes encode
SpeB, which degrades the xenophagy adaptor proteins p62 and NRB1. GAS serotypes that are
normally destroyed by xenophagy can be functionally complemented for xenophagy evasion and
intracellular replication by expressing SpeB.
To inhibit autophagy, pathogens frequently impair the function of xenophagy machinery. The
RavZ protein secreted by Legionella pneumophilia inactivates LC3, effectively blocking
ϯϯ
autophagy in infected cells. Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Herpes Simplex virus, and
Kaposis sarcoma herpesvirus inactivate Beclin 1 to inhibit autophagy at specific points in their
life cycle. Many viruses, such as Coxsackievirus, Hepatitis B virus, and HIV, inhibit
autophagosome-lysosome fusion, functionally inhibiting xenophagy. The exact mechanism by
which these viruses block autophagosome maturation is unknown, but many different RNA
viruses encode proteins that interact with LC3, p62, NDP52, or NRB1. These proteins have
several roles in xenophagy, but microbes may alter autophagosome maturation by manipulating
these proteins.
ϯϰ
autophagy produces energy for the cell to indirectly enhance viral replication. In addition to
energy production, Dengue virus modifies autophagosomes or amphisomes to form a replicative
niche. Rather than being degraded through xenophagy, autophagy contributes to the maturation
of infectious particles.
F. tularensis replicates in the cytosol of infected cells and induces an ATG5-independent, non-
canonical form of autophagy. F. tularensis harvests amino acids from ATG5-independent
autophagy for optimal intracellular replication. The amino acids are used for protein synthesis
and are also metabolized as a major carbon source. F. tularensis bacteria are frequently adjacent
to autophagosomes, indicating that F. tularensis is in the optimal physical location to compete
with the host for autophagy derived nutrients. Although F. tularensis bacteria are frequently
adjacent to autophagosomes, live bacteria are rarely degraded by xenophagy. O-antigen
contributes to F. tularensis xenophagy evasion, but other effectors are also likely to be involved.
A. phagocytophilum replicates in a vacuolar compartment and recruits autophagosomes directly
to its replicative inclusions. A. phagocytophilum induces autophagy with the type IV secretion
system (T4SS) effector Ats-1. Ats-1 binds to Beclin 1 and induces autophagosome nucleation
directly rather than signaling through mTOR. Ats-1 induced autophagosomes localize with the
inclusion membrane, suggesting that autophagosomes fuse with the inclusion body so that the
bacteria can acquire the by-products of autophagic degradation. Inhibition of autophagy
decreases A. phagocytophilum replication due to amino acid deficiency. Likewise, C. burnetti
induces autophagy to enhance replication. C burnetti enters cells upon phagocytosis and modifies
the phagosome to form a C. burnetti containing vacuoles (CCV). CCVs promiscuously fuse with
other CCVs, endosomes and autophagosomes using the T4SS effector Cig2 (Newton et al., 2014;
Winchell et al., 2014). When autophagy is impaired, CCVs do not fuse with one another and
there is a severe replication defect (Gutierrez et al., 2005; Newton et al., 2014). The
autophagosomes recruited to the CCV contain LC3, p62, and LAMP-1, suggesting that the
autophagosomes that are recruited to CCVs have already fused with lyosomes. Since artificially
enhancing autophagy further increases C. burnetti replication, the fusion of autophagosomes with
the CCV has been postulated as a nutrient and membrane acquisition mechanism.
T. gondii induces autophagy in infected host cells in a calcium dependent, mTOR independent
manner. Inhibiting autophagy decreases T. gondii replication and parasite replication is rescued
by supplementing with additional amino acids. Unlike its bacterial counterparts, fusion of T.
gondii containing parasitophorous vacuoles (PVs) with autophagosomes leads to parasite
destruction. T. gondii activates EGFR and AKT to inhibit PV-autophagosome fusion with EGF-
MICs, primarily MIC3 and MIC6.
Exploiting autophagy for nutrients is a recurrent theme in the pathogenesis of a diverse range of
microbes. Several other microbes have enhanced replication when autophagy is induced and
impaired intracellular replication when autophagy is inhibited, such as Chikungunya virus, B.
pseudomallei and L. amazonensis. B. pseudomallei encodes the protein BPSS0180, which
induces autophagy and is required for optimal intracellular replication. Similarly, L. amazonensis
ϯϱ
induces autophagy and has a replication defect when cells are deficient for autophagy. The role
of autophagy in enhancing replication of these pathogens is unknown, but nutrient acquisition is
a likely explanation for these phenotypes. (19)
ϯϲ
ϯϳ
apoptosis-defective tumour cells to a necrotic cell fate, generates chronically necrotic tumors.
This can corrupt a normal wound-healing response to support tumour growth, representing a
possible means by which autophagy defects provide a non-cell-autonomous mechanism for
stimulating tumorigenesis. In contrast to apoptosis, necrosis and cell lysis causes nuclear
HMGB1 to be released from cells, and this and other events stimulate the innate immune
response, the recruitment of inflammatory cells, cytokine production and nuclear factor-ț%
1)ț%DFWLYDWLRQZKLFKLQVRPHFDVHVLVOLQNHG to increased tumorigenesis. Indeed, blocking
autophagy with constitutive activation of Akt in apoptosis-defective cells results in necrosis in
response to metabolic stress in vitro, and in tumours in vivo this necrosis is coincident with NF-
ț%DFWLYDWLRQand promotion of tumorigenesis. How different cell-death processes interface with
the immune system and tumour micro-environment to modulate tumour growth is far from clear
and is an important area for future investigation.
How defective autophagy and compromised survival to stress can promote tumour progression
despite reduced cellular fitness is suggested by the increased rate of cellular damage
accumulation. In tumour cells in which cell-cycle checkpoints are inactivated, autophagy limits
the accumulation of genome damage and suppresses the mutation rate. This supports the role for
autophagy in protecting the genome in a cell-autonomous mechanism of tumour suppression. It
is currently unclear how autophagy limits genome damage, but this could involve maintaining
energy homeostasis or preventing the damaging effects of oxidative stress from defective
organelle and unfolded protein accumulation. As we begin to define the role of tumour cell
metabolism in response to stress, the rational ability to modulate the autophagy pathway in
cancer therapy is emerging.
Apoptosis and metabolic stress:
A common cellular response to metabolic stress is cell death by apoptosis, and in tumour cells in
particular this apoptosis is crucial to suppressing tumorigenesis. The tumour-suppressive role for
apoptosis is well known, originating with the realization that many tumours have apoptosis
suppressed by various mechanisms, including overexpression of the apoptosis inhibitor BCL2,
and that preventing apoptotic cell death allows tumour cells to survive the stress of oncogene
activation, uncontrolled proliferation and chemotherapy. Indeed, BCL2 antagonists have entered
the clinic as part of the armamentarium to functionally restore the apoptotic pathway to resistant
tumours.
There is an entire family of multidomain (BCL2 homology regions or BH1-4) anti-apoptotic
BCL2-homologous proteins that function to sequester the core pro-apoptotic regulators,
multidomain BAX and BAK. Pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins disrupt this BAX and BAK
antagonism by BCL2-like proteins and some might directly activate BAX and BAK to propagate
the death signal. Once activated, BAX and BAK oligomerize and permeabilize membranes,
particularly the outer mitochondrial membrane, to release pro-apoptotic factors such as
cytochrome c and SMAC/DIABLO. Cytochrome c is a cofactor for the apoptosome that activates
the cysteine protease caspase 9, whereas SMAC/DIABLO inhibits the caspase antagonists, the
inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). Together, this results in effector caspase activation and
widespread cellular protein substrate cleavage, causing cell death.
ϯϴ
Exactly how metabolic stress triggers apoptosis is not completely understood, but it is associated
with the induction of the pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein PUMA, requires the BH3-only protein
BIM, depends on either BAX or BAK, and is inhibited by BCL2. Once the apoptotic signal
reaches BAX and BAK, mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, caspase activation and cell
death occur in less than an hour and the process is extremely efficient and irreversible.
Neighboring cells or professional phagocytes engulf apoptotic cells, preventing the activation of
an innate inflammatory response. These attributes are the reasons why apoptosis defects are
selected for in tumours and why restoring the apoptotic response is desirable for cancer therapy.
Tumour cells with defects in apoptosis through either deficiency in BAX and BAK or gain of
BCL2 or BCL-XL (also known as BCL2L1) function are highly resistant to metabolic stress and
the properties of these µundead cells¶ are revealing insights into the mechanisms regulating m
Metabolic stress has a major influence on tumours in vivo, either as a stimulator of apoptosis to
limit tumour progression, or as a damaging insult in surviving apoptosis-defective tumour cells.
Tumours are frequently subjected to metabolic stress, arising from the initial lack of a blood
supply, vascular collapse in established tumours or therapeutic intervention. It is well known that
tumour cells can be reliant on the inefficient process of glycolysis, rather than the more
productive energy-generating process of oxidative phosphorylation, to support metabolism (the
Warburg effect). As such, tumour cells are particularly vulnerable to metabolic stress, which is
only exacerbated by the high energy demand of unrestrained cell growth and the potentially
reduced capacity to access the nutrient recycling activity provided by autophagy. How apoptosis-
defective tumour cells adapt to metabolic stress and if or how this facilitates tumour progression
has now been linked to autophagy.etabolic stress response.
Autophagy promotes survival
Evidence suggests that a constitutive, low level of basal autophagy in normal tissues provides an
important homeostatic, housekeeping function. Targeted deletion of Atg5 or Atg7 in the brain
causes the accumulation of polyubiquitylated protein aggregates and neuronal degeneration,
supporting a role for autophagy in protein quality control. Furthermore, ATG5 is required for
maintaining T-cell survival and proliferation37. Autophagy induction in response to stress and
starvation also has a crucial role in normal cells. For example, Atg5-deficient mice fail to live
through the neonatal survival period, during which tissues show signs of amino-acid depletion
and metabolic insufficiency. These findings support a prosurvival role for autophagy in both
normal tissues and in response to metabolic stress.
In cancer cells, metabolic stress robustly induces autophagy, which is sustained when apoptosis
is blocked. Importantly, autophagy is required for tumour cells to survive metabolic stress.
Genetic inactivation of autophagy, either indirectly by constitutive activation of the
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway or directly by allelic loss of Becnl or deficiency in
Atg5, or by RNA interference (RNAi), prevents survival in response to metabolic deprivation
even when apoptosis is inactivated. Presumably, in the absence of an external nutrient source the
catabolic capacity of autophagy can sustain viability, but the role of autophagy in cell damage
ϯϵ
control and mitigation in response to stress may be equally important. Amino-acid starvation,
glucose and oxygen deprivation, growth-factor withdrawal and cytotoxic cellular damage are
among the many stimuli that potently induce autophagy. In the example of nutrient starvation,
autophagy serves as a back-up energy reserve, whereas the autophagic response to cellular
damage probably facilitates adaptation through the removal of damaged proteins and organelles.
Autophagy regulation:
Autophagy is controlled mainly, but not exclusively, by the kinase mammalian target of
rapamycin (mTOR; also known as FRAP1), which is a downstream component of the PI3K
pathway. mTOR functions in part to suppress autophagy in response to nutrient and growth-
factor availability. Conditions of starvation cause the de-repression of autophagy, which initiates
isolation membrane or phagophore formation and the subsequent genesis of autophagosomes.
Autophagosomes are double-membrane vesicles that sequester cytoplasm and organelles. The
autophagy-regulated or Atg proteins are required for the activation of autophagy, the formation
of autophagosomes, the sequestration of intracellular constituents, and the targeting and fusion of
autophagosomes to lysosomes where the contents are degraded and recycled. For example, the
serine/threonine protein kinase ATG1 (also known as ULK1) is a candidate for activation by
mTOR de-repression that stimulates autophagy. ATG5 is required for autophagy and becomes
covalently conjugated to the ubiquitin-like protein ATG12 by the ubiqutin-activating enzyme
ATG7, but the specific role of this process in autophagy is not known. BECN1 is part of the class
III PI3K VPS34 complex that is also required for autophagy. ATG8 (also known as MAP1LC3)
is another ubiquitin-like protein that is cleaved, lipidated and becomes a component of the
autophagosome membrane, and this membrane translocation event is commonly used to monitor
autophagy.
The mechanics of phagophore and autophagosome formation and the recognition and capture of
autophagosome cargo are presently unclear. Autophagy may be a nonspecific, bulk degradation
process in some situations, and in others it may be specific for targeting mitochondria, catalase,
peroxisomes, endoplasmic reticulum, and aggregation-prone proteins and protein aggregates for
autophagy-mediated degradation. In the case of polyubiquitylated proteins, the multifunctional
adaptor protein p62/SQSTM1 might facilitate the specific autophagosome-targeting process. If
or how other aggregation-prone proteins, protein aggregates and organelles are recognized and
targeted by the autophagy machinery is yet to be determined.
Autophagy in cell survival or death:
In cancer cells, autophagy can, in some situations, increase apoptotic and caspase-independent57
cell death. However, autophagy has a more prominent role in sustaining cell viability in cancer
cells with defects in apoptosis. Apoptosis-defective tumour cells have the remarkable ability to
tolerate long-term metabolic stress, either by cytokine deprivation in dependent lymphoid cells
or by oxygen (hypoxia) and glucose deprivation in epithelial cells. Although the absence of pro-
apoptotic BAX and BAK or the gain of anti-apoptotic BCL2 or BCL-XL function adequately
explains why cells fail to die when deprived, it is insufficient to explain how cell viability is
maintained for weeks under the harsh metabolic stress conditions of nutrient deprivation in vitro
ϰϬ
and in vivo. It is now clear that surviving metabolic stress in vitro and in tumours in vivo is
dependent on autophagy.
The availability of cells with defects in apoptosis, with or without the capacity for autophagy
%HFQRU%HFQíDQG$WJ$WJíRU$WJííKDVDOORZHGDSURORQJHGHYDOXDWLRQ
of the cellular response to metabolic stress, the survival from which is autophagy-dependent.
Deprived epithelial and lymphoid cells using the autophagy survival function remain viable for
weeks, during which time they undergo a dramatic decrease in cell size through progressive
cellular consumption. Although BCL2 localized to the endoplasmic reticulum can interact with
BECN1 and inhibit autophagy, in the functional context in which the normally predominantly
mitochondrial BCL2 blocks apoptosis and confers tumorigenic growth, autophagy is efficiently
induced in response to metabolic stress. It remains possible that the regulation of BECN1 by
BCL2 is more subtle or context-dependent.
It is clear from the analysis of time-lapse microscopy of apoptosis-defective immortal epithelial
cells undergoing autophagy-mediated survival as a result of starvation that this is a complex,
poorly characterized and prolonged process. Initially, autophagy supports the continuation of cell
proliferation under metabolic stress, which is consistent with a role for autophagy in the
maintenance of homeostasis to support normal cell function during intermittent interruptions in
nutrient availability. This µmaintenance phase¶ might also be crucial for sustaining ATP levels
and cardiac function during the neonatal starvation period in mice.
Beyond two days of starvation cell division ceases, cells shrink markedly, motility is suppressed
and cells aggregate into small clusters. These aggregated clusters of starved cells often show
evidence of cells consuming other cells, or heterophagy, particularly when cells are in a confined
space such as spheroid growth in Matrigel. Whether these cells are dead or alive at the time of
consumption or if the persistence of these corpses reflects degradation failure due to defective
autophagy remains to be determined. Furthermore, if or how this contributes to viability of the
cell population is not determined. This µpreservation phase¶ is probably vital for controlling
cellular consumption and mitigating protein and organelle damage while suppressing metabolism
and energy use to prolong cell viability and enable recovery .
Autophagy enables stress recovery:
Remarkably, autophagy affords cells a resilient capacity for regeneration, whereby restoration of
nutrients results in an increase in cell size to that before starvation and resumption of cell
proliferation. This recovery process is rapid and efficient, and dramatically impaired by defects
LQDXWRSKDJ\%HFQíRU$WJíí7KXVDXWRSKDJ\-deficient cells not only fail to tolerate
metabolic stress but are also defective in the recovery process. Mitigation of the damaging
effects of stress, including damaged protein, DNA and organelle accumulation during this phase
is probably crucial for enabling recovery.
Following prolonged starvation and progressive autophagy, what defines the minimal cell that is
capable of recovery and what events eventually lead to cellular demise are currently unknown.
ϰϭ
This capacity for durable, long-term survival of metabolic stress through autophagy might be
vital for the survival of tumour cells that remain viable following treatment, for metastatic
tumour cells and possibly for stem cells. In cells using autophagy to survive metabolic stress
there is a gradual erosion of cell viability with time, but whether this is due to autophagic cell
death or eventual cellular attrition through atrophy is not clear. Finally, the interaction of cells
undergoing progressive autophagy, either dead or alive, with the immune system is unknown.
Autophagy and tumour dormancy:
One of the most daunting clinical problems is the frequent re-emergence of tumours following
treatment, often after prolonged dormancy59. How residual tumour cells cope with metabolic
stress and remain viable yet dormant needs to be determined, as elimination of these tumour cells
might be essential to achieving durable treatment responses. The survival of tumour cells through
autophagy may be a key mechanism to enable long-term tumour-cell survival and eventual re-
growth and relapse. Thus, autophagy may allow residual or metastasizing tumour cells to tolerate
metabolic deprivation with the flexibility to recover once growth conditions are favorable. This
dramatic capacity for recovery afforded by autophagy vaguely resembles the process of
sporulation in microorganisms, and its suppression may be essential to achieve efficient cancer
eradication.
Metabolic stress and necrosis:
Inactivation of autophagy, either by allelic loss of Becn1, deficiency in Atg5, RNAi knockdown
of expression of essential autophagy regulators, or constitutive activation of the PI3K pathway
and mTOR-mediated inhibition of autophagy, prevents cells surviving metabolic stress. In
apoptosis-defective cells this results in cell death by necrosis. What specifically triggers necrosis
is unknown, but insufficient ATP production to maintain plasma-membrane integrity resulting in
metabolic catastrophe and cell lysis is highly probable36. This is important because inhibition of
autophagy is a means for sensitizing tumour cells to metabolic stress that is effective even in
tumour cells with defects in apoptosis that would otherwise be difficult to eliminate. Although
diverting apoptosis-defective tumour cells to a necrotic cell fate may not be a benign cell death,
stimulation of acute necrotic cell death, if efficient enough, may be therapeutically useful.
Indeed, the mechanism of cell death induction by alkylating agents involves poly (ADP-ribose)
polymerase (PARP) activation and ATP consumption resulting in acute necrotic tumour cell
death, which probably accounts for their success in the clinic62. Combining autophagy inhibitors
with metabolic stress conditions might be a similarly effective means of promoting acute
necrotic tumour cell death.
Necrotic cell death stimulates inflammation:
Necrosis typically results from physical injury in which cell lysis and the release of intracellular
contents, including HMGB1, activate the innate immune system and a wound-healing response.
This recruitment of inflammatory cells provides cytokines, fostering cell growth to replace
damaged tissue while removing cell debris. Once the tissue damage is repaired, the wound-
healing response abates. Tumours, however, often show persistent, chronic necrosis and
inflammation in a corrupted version of a wound-healing response. Necrotic tumours are
ϰϮ
associated with poor prognosis and the persistent inflammatory infiltration and cytokine
production are thought to promote tumour growth. A high proportion of tumours have
constitutive activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase pathway, which inhibits the induction
of autophagy in response to metabolic stress, and many tumours also have defects in apoptosis.
This generates a necrotic cell-death response to metabolic stress. A chronic necrotic response to
persistent metabolic stress is created by rapid tumour growth and high metabolic demand that
outpaces ATP production by glycolysis, angiogenesis and nutrient availability. Thus, a necrotic
cell fate is a common event in tumorigenesis, and evidence suggests that this alters the tumour±
microenvironment interaction, although the mechanisms involved are poorly understood.
Autophagy and tumour suppression:
The role for autophagy as a survival mechanism in normal cells and in tumour cells seems to
contradict the observation that loss-of-function mutations in the autophagy pathway are
associated with tumour progression. Furthermore, constitutive activation of the PI3K pathway is
one of the most common events in human cancer, and the downstream kinase mTOR restricts
autophagy induction in response to starvation64. How loss of this autophagy-mediated survival
pathway promotes tumorigenesis was initially difficult to reconcile; however, two non-mutually
exclusive possibilities have emerged. One explanation is that stimulation of necrotic cell death
and inflammation caused by defects in apoptosis and autophagy provides a cell with non-
autonomous means of tumour promotion through induction of a chronic wound-healing response.
Another explanation is that proper management of metabolic stress through autophagy is
required in tumour cells to suppress the accumulation of deleterious mutations, perhaps caused
by the increased oxidative stress that can drive tumour progression. As such, overall cellular
viability is compromised in tumour cells with defects in autophagy, but this initial disadvantage
is overcome by an increased mutation rate resulting from failure of stress management in a cell-
autonomous mechanism of tumour promotion. This is analogous to the mechanism by which
defects in DNA repair cause sensitivity to DNA damage, yet the accelerated rate of mutation that
results from deficient DNA repair confers an increased incidence of tumour formation.
Autophagy limits genome damage:
Autophagy is required in stressed cells for maintaining protein and organelle quality control and
energy homeostasis. A possible reconciliation of the pro-survival and tumour suppression
functions of autophagy is that some aspect of the mismanagement of metabolic stress in
autophagy-deficient tumour cells leads to genome damage and tumour progression. This could
occur through protein, organelle and DNA damage, or insufficient ATP levels for essential
cellular functions that are required to maintain genome integrity, such as mitosis and DNA
replication and repair. This notion is supported by upregulation of the DNA damage response,
evidence of DNA double-strand breaks, and aneuploidy in autophagy-defective immortal
epithelial cells in association with increased tumorigenesis. This genome damage is manifested
most obviously in cells with a defect in apoptosis, which would otherwise eliminate most of
these damaged, abnormal cells, and is probably also facilitated by cell-cycle checkpoint
inactivation (immortalization through RB1 and p53 loss). Increased genome damage resulting
from an autophagy defect, however, does not require a defect in apoptosis, consistent with the
ϰϯ
tumour-prone state of Becn1-heterozygous mutant mice that have the apoptotic response intact.
The origin of the increased DNA damage in autophagy-defective cells is not yet known.
Malfunctioning organelles, accumulation of toxic protein aggregates, generation of reactive
oxygen species and oxidative stress, and failure of energy homeostasis are all potential
contributors to induction of genome damage when autophagy is defective.
Genetic instability and an enhanced mutation rate promote tumour-cell evolution and adaptation
to drive progression and resistance to therapy. It is the rare, adapted, resistant tumour cells,
which emerge typically following therapy, that are lethal. Autophagy deficient, immortal
epithelial cells show an increased rate of gene amplification, the most common mechanism of
oncogene activation in human tumours67, rendering this scenario plausible. Cancer is a disease
where it is often the case that what grows back kills you, and what grows back is a mutated and
more aggressive version of the original tumour generated by mutation, selection and genome
instability. Despite the reduced cellular fitness caused by deficient autophagy, the poor survival
but superior adaptation through an increased mutation rate might be the key advantage that
promotes tumorigenesis. Interestingly, autophagy is associated with longevity, suggesting a role
in the suppression of ageing phenotypes. As DNA damage accelerates both cancer and ageing,
this supports a general role for autophagy in protecting cellular and genome fitness to prevent
cancer and extend lifespan. (20)
ϰϰ
Autophagy is a cell survival process which is related to breaking down and reusing cytoplasm
components. Moreover, autophagy regulates cell death under certain conditions. Apoptosis has
the characteristics of chromatin agglutination and the shrinking of nuclear and apoptosis body
form. Even if the mechanisms of autophagy and apoptosis have differences, some proteins
modulate both autophagy and apoptosis. Crosstalk between them exists. This review highlights
recent advances in the interaction of autophagy and apoptosis and its importance in the
development of cardiovascular diseases.
1. Molecular Mechanisms of Autophagy:
Autophagy is a complex and evolutionarily conserved process. It is involved in the degrading of
abnormal proteins and organelles. Autophagy is significant for maintaining cellular homeostasis
under regular conditions, and is rapidly triggered by different stimuli such as nutrient starvation,
hypoxia, oxidative stress, pathogen infection and endoplasmic reticulum stress. There are mainly
three kinds of autophagy: (1) microautophagy, which directly sequesters and engulfs the
cytoplasmic constituents via indentation inwards of the lysosome membrane; (2) chaperone-
controlled autophagy, where cytosolic proteins with the KFERQ-like motif are recognized by
chaperones, then unfold and translocate into the lysosome through the lysosomal-associated
membrane protein type 2A; and (3) macroautophagy, which is characterized by formation of the
autophagosome (a double-membrane sequestering compartment) and fusing with the lysosome to
deliver the cytoplasmic cargo. The process of macroautophagy (hereinafter referred to as
autophagy) is as follows: induction, nucleation of the autophagosome precursor (phagophore),
phagophore expansion and autophagosome maturation, fusing with the lysosome, and recycling
of the degraded cargo.
Autophagy Induction: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) integrates nutrient signals
and cytokines from different pathways to inhibit autophagy and promote cell growth. Under
stress or nutrient starvation conditions, mTOR is inhibited, which initiates autophagy by
formation of the Unc-51-Like Kinase (ULK) complex including ULK, Autophagy-related
Protein 13 (Atg13) and FAK-family Interacting Protein of 200 kDa (FIP200). Then the ULK
complex phosphorylates Activating Molecule in Beclin-1-Regulated Autophagy (AMBRA1),
which activates the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) complex composed of Vacuolar Protein
Sorting 15 (VPS15), VPS34, Beclin-1 and AMBRA1. During autophagy initiation, Beclin-1 is
phosphorylated. Then Beclin-1 is separated from the dynein motor complexes, which are
positively regulated by AMBRA1.
Autophagosome Formation: Once autophagy is induced, phagophore assembling is initiated by
membrane nucleation. The membranes mostly originate from the mitochondria, endoplasmic
reticulum, trans-Golgi network, late endosomes, and plasma membrane. Elongation and
expansion of the phagophore membrane is an important stage in autophagosome formation. It is
modulated by two inter-related systems of Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 and Atg8. In Atg12-Atg5-Atg16,
Atg12 is initially triggered by the Atg7 in an ATP-dependent way. Then Atg12 is transferred to
ϰϱ
the E2-like conjugating enzyme Atg10 and forms the Atg12-Atg10 intermediate. Finally, Atg12
is covalently attached to Atg5. Further interplay between Atg5-Atg12 and the Atg16 homodimer
leads to formation of the Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 complex. This complex locating to the phagophore
is essential for autophagy. The second ubiquitin-like system induces the conjugation of
phosphatidylethanolamine to Atg8/microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), which
is subsequently processed by Atg4, Atg7 and Atg3. LC3-I is transformed into LC3-II. LC3-II is a
special marker for the autophagosome.
Autolysosome Formation and Recycling of the Degraded Cargo: Autolysosome formation
originates from the transmitting and fusion of the autophagosome to lysosome. It is regulated by
cytoskeleton and lysosomal membrane proteins. LAMP1/2 regulates autophagosome maturation.
Gene mutation of LAMP2 causes Danon disease. Autophagosome accumulation and
cardiomyocyte hypertrophy are characteristics of Danon disease. Once the autolysosome forms,
the inner cargoes are degraded by lysosomal hydrolases. Catabolic products such as amino acids
release into the cytoplasm for recycling and can be used as new resources.
2. Molecular Mechanisms of Apoptosis:
Apoptosis is a process characterized by chromatin condensation, nuclear
shrinkage and apoptosis body production. The apoptotic signaling cascade mainly
includes two pathways, intrinsic and extrinsic, and it gets triggered by different
mitochondrial stimuli or by molecules binding to the cell-membrane receptor. The
intrinsic apoptosis signaling is induced by various stimuli, such as hypoxia, DNA
damage, oxidative stress and deprivation of growth factor. It leads to
mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. The integrity of mitochondria is
regulated by different Bcl-2 superfamily members. They have the feature of the
BH3 (Bcl-2 Homology) domain. Bcl-2 proteins are divided into two
subcategories: pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic. Pro-apoptotic family members
contain Bak, Bax, Bid, Bad, Noxa and PUMA. The anti-apoptotic family
members include Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, Bcl-W and A1/Bfl-1. The multi-domain
pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Bak are essential for inducing apoptosis. In
response to stimulation of apoptosis, these proteins undergo conformational
changes. It leads to their oligomerization on the outer membrane of mitochondria.
Bcl-2 proteins block this pathway by interacting with Bax and Bak. It inhibits
mitochondria permeabilization and cell death. After mitochondrial
permeabilization, cytochrome c is released into the cytoplasm. Then cytochrome c
binds to apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1). It induces the
conformational change and oligomerization of Apaf-1. This leads to the forming
of a caspase-activating platform called the apoptosome. The apoptosome is
comprised of Apaf-1, caspase-9 and cytochrome c. The apoptosome recruits,
dimerizes and triggers caspase-9. Successively, it cleaves and induces caspase-3
and caspase-7. The last step of apoptosis is degrading DNA. The process is
regulated by Endonuclease G. Endonuclease G is translocated from mitochondria
to the nucleus and cleaves DNA.
ϰϲ
The extrinsic apoptosis pathway is initiated through activating the death receptors.
Death receptors bind to ligands and deliver apoptosis signaling. The cognate
extracellular death ligands refer to soluble molecules of tumor necrosis factor
(TNF). They are released as homotrimers and bind to the TNF-receptor (TNF-R).
The TNF-R family is comprised of Fas/CD95, TNF-R1, TRAIL receptors-1
(TRAIL-R1), TRAIL-R2, DR-3 and DR-6. Ligand-binding makes the cell
membrane receptors trimerize and activate [43]. TNF-Rs have a death domain
(DD) that can recruit other DD-associated proteins. The DD-associated proteins
include the Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD) and TNF-R type 1-
associated death domain protein (TRADD) these proteins bind to caspase-8 and -
10. Then the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) is activated. DISC
primarily activates caspase-8 and promotes the cell death outcome. Caspase-3 and
-7 are cleaved after induction of caspase-8 and -10, which causes cell degradation.
Emerging evidence suggests interactions among the crucial proteins of autophagy and apoptosis,
which underlie the molecular mechanism of the crosstalk between them.
3.1.Bcl-2/Beclin-1:
The B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family proteins inhibit cytochrome c releasing from the
mitochondria. It plays a critical role in the apoptosis process. Beclin-1 is a component of
the class III PI3K/Vps34 complex and is necessary for forming the autophagy vesicle.
Bcl-2 binds to Beclin-1 and segregates Beclin-1 away from class III PI3K, leading to an
inhibition of autophagic response. In contrast, mutations of either Beclin-1¶s domain or
the BH3 receptor domain within Bcl-2 will disrupt the Bcl-2-Beclin-1 complex, which
promotes autophagic activity. The interplay between Bcl-2 and Beclin-1 is essential to
regulate the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis.
Under the condition of sufficient nutrition, Beclin-1 and Bax/Bak bind to Bcl-2 or Bcl-
XL. It inhibits activation of autophagy and apoptosis, respectively. Under conditions of
starvation, autophagy is essential to guarantee cell survival. C-Jun N-terminal protein
kinase 1 (JNK1) is activated and phosphorylates various residuum (Thr69, Ser70, and
Ser87) of Bcl-2¶s regulatory loop. It leads to Bcl-2-Beclin-1 complex destruction, which
induces autophagy. After autophagy activation, death-associated protein kinase (DAPK)
phosphorylates the Thr119 of Beclin-1. It induces Beclin-1 separating from Bcl-2.
Moreover, phosphorylating Beclin-1 on Thr119 decreases the Bcl-XL-Beclin-1
combining. It promotes autophagosome formation. The cytosolic translocation of high
mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is another factor promoting Bcl-2/Bcl-XL separation
from Beclin-1. The intramolecular disulphide bridge (C23/45) of HMGB1 interacts with
Beclin-1, which causes HMGB-1 to replace Bcl-2. Undergoing a long period of
starvation cannot be relieved by autophagy. Phosphorylated Bcl-2 combines with Bax
ϰϳ
and inhibits apoptosis. The phosphorylated Bcl-2 protects cells against apoptosis through
preserving the mitochondrial membrane completeness and preventing the pro-apoptosis
proteins from releasing into the cytoplasm. However, in the situation of extreme
starvation, JNK1 promotes hyper-phosphorylation of Bcl-2. It promotes Bcl-2 separating
from Bax. Then it induces apoptosis via caspase-3-dependent pathways and,
subsequently, a safe cell death.
3.2.Atgs:
Autophagy-related proteins (Atgs) involved in various stages of autophagy have also
been shown to regulate the apoptotic pathway. Gene mutation or inhibition of these
specific Atgs may affect the apoptosis process. Atg3 is a non-canonical ubiquitination E2
enzyme regulating the conjugation of ubiquitin-like Atg8 to phosphatidylethanolamine in
the autophagy process. In addition, recent studies have shown that Atg12 covalently
conjugates to Atg3. The Atg3-Atg12 complex localizes to the mitochondrial outer
membrane, regulating mitochondrial homeostasis and cell death. Atg12 conjugation to
Atg3 sensitizes cells to mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. However, it has no effect on
death receptor±mediated apoptosis. Disturbing the complex formation, selective
mitochondrial autophagy (also called mitophagy) is reduced significantly, but it has no
effect upon non-selective autophagy.
Atg4 is a cysteine protease cleaving the C-terminus of LC3, which has an effect on the
covalent attachment of newly synthesized Atg8 to PE and on the delipidation of Atg8 at
the lysosomal fusion stage. Atg4D, a human Atg4 member, is cleaved by caspase3 and
generates two fragments in the apoptosis cell. The N-terminal fragment of Atg4D
FOHDYHVDQGGHOLSLGDWHVWKH$WJSDUDORJXHȖ-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated
protein-like 1 (GABARAP-L1), which leads to the decrease of autophagosome
formation. The C-terminal fragment with a putative BH3 domain is recruited to the
mitochondrial matrix, promoting the mitochondria-mediated apoptosis.
Covalent conjugation of the autophagy-related proteins Atg5 and Atg12 involved in an
ubiquitylation-like process is essential to autophagosome formation. Atg5 and Atg12 are,
therefore, integral parts of the autophagic machinery and are required for the induction
of autophagy. Hence, Atg5 and Atg12 are absolutely necessary for autophagic activity.
Interestingly, it has been found that Atg5 and Atg12 also participate in apoptosis
initiation in response to various stress signals. Moreover, non-conjugated forms of Atg5
and Atg12 have an effect on the induction of apoptosis, which indicates that their effect
on apoptosis is likely to be independent of their effect on autophagy. Atg5 has a double
role in regulating autophagy and apoptosis. One study reported that over-expression of
Atg5 made the tumor cells sensitive to chemotherapy, while silencing the Atg5 gene
with short interfering RNA made the cells partially resistant to chemotherapy. This study
showed that, during apoptosis, Atg5 was cleaved by calpains, producing an amino-
terminal cleavage product. Truncated Atg5 moved from the cytoplasm to mitochondria.
Then it interacted with Bcl-XL and promoted cytochrome c release and caspase
activation. Atg5 cleavage was found independent of the apoptotic stimulus and cell type.
It was indicated that calpain induction and Atg5 cleavage were universal phenomena in
apoptotic cells. On the contrary, without Atg5 in mitochondria, autophagy takes place.
ϰϴ
Atg12 has a dual function, participating in autophagy and apoptosis, which connects both of the
processes. Non-conjugated Atg12 can combine with and inhibit Mcl-1 and Bcl-2 by a BH3-like
motif, which positively regulates mitochondrial apoptosis. In the apoptosis cell, knockout of
Atg12 inhibits Bax induction and cytochrome c release. On the contrary, aberrant expression of
Atg12 represses the anti-apoptotic activity of Mcl-1. In addition, a recent study demonstrated
that free Atg12 was unstable. It could be broken down in a proteasome-dependent way. Atg12
could be directly ubiquitinated, which promotes the proteasomal degradation. Free Atg12 could
cause proteasome inhibitor±regulated apoptosis, indicating proteasome inhibitors might be
potential anticancer agents in clinical practice.
3.3.Caspases:
Caspases are both the initiators and effectors participating in apoptotic cascades.
Recently, it has been found that caspases participate in regulating the crosstalk between
autophagy and apoptosis. Various pro-apoptosis pathways can induce caspases to trigger
apoptosis. Moreover, activated caspases could cleave and break down the critical
autophagic proteins (such as Beclin-1, p62, Atg3, Atg4D, Atg5, Atg7, and AMBRA1). It
leads to an inactivation of their autophagic function. Surprisingly, some pro-autophagic
proteins can even be transformed into pro-apoptotic proteins to initiate apoptosis cell
death after being cleaved by caspases. In addition, autophagy can have an effect on
apoptotic cascades through modulating the caspases.
Caspase-2 is an important regulator of cascades in a context-dependent way. Recent
research reported that mice neurons in the absence of caspase-2 cannot execute
apoptosis, while autophagy is activated at an early stage. It causes a response to
rotenone-regulated mitochondrial oxidative stress. It has also been found that, in mouse
embryonic fibroblasts, a lack of caspase-2 contributes to an enhanced autophagy.
Caspase-3 is a predominant effector caspase in apoptosis. However, accumulating
studies have shown that caspase-3 is essential to autophagic activity. A study reported
that, during staurosporine-induced apoptosis, caspase-3 could cleave Beclin-1 on 124
and 149. It inhibited autophagy and activated apoptosis in HeLa cells. Another study
found that caspase-3, together with other caspases, cleaved Beclin-1 in the apoptosis
process. It regulated by IL-3 deprivation in culture medium, blocking autophagic activity
and promoting the pro-apoptotic stimulus. The Beclin-1 C-terminal fragment localized at
the mitochondria. Subsequently, it sensitized the cell to apoptosis.
Caspase-6 is also an effector caspase in apoptosis. It has been demonstrated that caspase-
6 cleaves p62 and Atg3, which suggests its importance in mediating autophagy.
Moreover, when melanoma cell lines suffer arginine withdrawal, TRAIL-induced
caspase-6 activation disrupts autophagy by cleavage of two crucial autophagy proteins,
Atg5 and Beclin-1.
Caspase-8 is an essential trigger involved in death receptor±induced apoptosis. The
increasing evidence indicates that caspase-8 also participates in regulating autophagy.
During the death receptor±triggered apoptosis, caspase-8 cleaves Atg3, targeting the
conserved LETD sequence (Atg3 amino acids 166±169), which inactivates the pro-
ϰϵ
Caspase-9 is also a key triggering caspase participating in intrinsic apoptosis. It has been
reported that caspase-9 interacts with Atg7 at the C-terminal region. It promotes LC3-II
formation and autophagy activity. The interplay between caspase-9 and Atg7 hinders the
recruiting and processing of caspase-9 in apoptosomes, inhibiting caspase-9 activation
and apoptosis. Moreover, in breast cancer MCF-7 cells, suppression of caspase-9 can
block the autophagic flux and induce the cell death by inhibiting cytoprotective
autophagy.
3.4.p53:
ϱϬ
protein, is released into the cytoplasm where it binds to and promotes the mitochondrial
redistribution of Drp1. The interplay promotes Drp1-regulated fission of mitochondria
and, subsequently, mitoptosis. An increasing number of studies indicate that disruption
of mitochondria can cause promotion of autophagy. Indeed, a study reported activation
of mitoptosis and the subsequent destruction of ATP was followed by the induction of
autophagy to maintain the energy. Another study found that clearing away abnormal
mitochondria may be either be done through autophagosome formation via selective
mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) or through the formation of mitoptotic bodies.
Then they are released into the extracellular space via atypical exocytosis.
3.7.Mitophagy:
Mitophagy is the process of recognizing and removing abnormal mitochondria via autophagy-
regulated degradation. Recent research has demonstrated that mitochondrial dynamics are
essential to mitophagy. Mitochondrial fission is regulated by the GTPase dynamin-related
protein 1 (Drp1). Mitochondrial fusion includes three GTPases: optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) induces
inner membrane fusion and mitofusins 1 and 2 (Mfn1 and Mfn2) regulate outer membrane
fusion. Mitochondria are divided into depolarized and polarized mitochondria after fission.
Depolarized daughter mitochondria are targeted by mitophagy, while polarized mitochondria
undergo fusion. Interestingly, accumulating evidence suggests that mitophagy undergoes
extensive crosstalk with apoptosis pathways. Mitochondrial dynamics are crucial for the
crosstalk between mitophagy and apoptosis. A study reported that Parkin underwent extensive
crosstalk with apoptosis pathways. Mitochondrial translocation of Parkin was inhibited by pro-
survival Bcl-2 proteins. It was triggered by BH3-only proteins under conditions of inhibited
caspase activity. Undergoing this condition for a long time, Parkin could promote apoptosis by
degrading anti-apoptosis Mcl-1. Another study also found that the mitochondrial deubiquitinase
USP30 opposed parkin-regulated mitophagy. Knockdown of USP30 could induce the
mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. These findings indicated that USP30 would make
mitochondria induce mitophagy rather than apoptosis. Furthermore, pre-promotion of Bnip3-
mediated mitophagy by constitutively activating the Bnip3 receptor ahead of tumor necrosis
factor (TNF) treatment inhibited effector caspase activation significantly. It suggested that the
activation of mitophagy or delayed induction of membrane permeabilization inhibited apoptosis.
However, diverse feedback between individual mitophagy programs and both pro-survival and
pro-death apoptosis pathways occurred at different time scales and underwent crosstalk.
4. The Relationship between Autophagy and Apoptosis in Cardiac Diseases:
In physiological conditions, autophagy and apoptosis play essential roles in cardiac health
and integrity. The structure and function of cardiac myocytes is closely related to
autophagic flux. Cardiac myocytes retain a limited ability to enter the cell cycle again. It
leads to a limited capacity for regeneration in the adult heart. As a consequence, there
exists a continuous process of cell renovation. It includes removal and replacement of
damaged tissue. In addition, autophagy is necessary for continual heart contraction. It is
also critical for large cytoplasmic calcium transients without disturbing cardiac function.
During heart development, apoptosis participates in the development of the embryonic
ϱϭ
ϱϮ
ϱϯ
ϱϰ
Autophagy, a highly conserved mechanism of quality control inside cells, is essential for the
maintenance of cellular homeostasis and for the orchestration of an efficient cellular response to
stress. The decrease in autophagic activity observed in almost all cells and tissues as organisms
age was proposed to contribute to different aspects of the aging phenotype and to the aggravation
of detrimental age-related diseases. The recent advances in our understanding of the molecular
mechanisms underlying autophagy and the identification of the subset of genes involved in this
process has enabled the use of genetic manipulations to start testing this hypothesis.
Cellular quality control, autophagy and aging:
All cells rely on surveillance mechanisms, chaperones and proteolytic systems to control the
quality of their proteins and organelles and to guarantee that any malfunctioning or damaged
intracellular components are repaired or eliminated. Molecular chaperones interact with unfolded
or misfolded proteins and assist in their folding. However, if the extent of protein damage is too
great, or the cellular conditions are not adequate for re-folding, the same molecular chaperones
often deliver proteins for degradation. Two proteolytic systems contribute to cellular clearance:
the ubiquitin-proteasome and the lysosomal systems. Chaperone malfunctions or alterations in
the components of the proteolytic systems result in intracellular accumulation of damaged
proteins and organelles and underlie the basis of different human pathologies. Accumulation of
damage is also characteristic of tissues in all organisms as they age and has been proposed to be
responsible for their functional loss in aging. Changes with age in both the ubiquitin-proteasome
and the lysosomal system have been described, but only recently has the contribution of these
changes to the aging phenotype started to be elucidated. The main reason for the recent advances
has been the improved molecular characterization of the different cellular degradative pathways.
The identification of the genes encoding effectors and regulators of intracellular clearance has
now enabled direct analysis of the consequences of downregulation of their activity to levels
similar to those observed in old organisms. Likewise, genetic manipulations to prevent the age-
related functional decline of some of these systems have confirmed the contribution of the
accumulation of intracellular damage to their functional failure in aging. Here, I review the
contribution of the lysosomal system to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis - through
autophagy- and the recent findings linking the autophagic system to life-span extension and to
different aspects of cellular and organismal aging.
Autophagy: the comeback of an old pathway:
Lysosomes are organelles fully devoted to degrading diverse macromolecules both from the
extracellular environment and from inside the cells. Lysosomes contain the highest cellular
concentration of hydrolases (i.e. proteases, lipases, glycases and nucleotidases) in their lumen, in
addition to permeases in their membrane for recycling the essential building blocks of the
degraded products (e.g. amino acids, fatty acids and cholesterol, sugars, etc.) to the cytosol. In
ϱϱ
this respect, lysosomes are real recycling compartments in which cellular structures are broken
into their individual components, which can then be reused for synthesis of new cellular
structures. Lysosomes degrade both intact (functional) proteins, to guarantee continuous renewal
of the cellular proteome, and damaged proteins that are no longer functional, to avoid their
accumulation inside cells. Lysosomes not only degrade soluble individual proteins but also
particulate structures and complete organelles. This feature makes the lysosomal system
particularly relevant under conditions when damaged proteins start to organize into irreversible
oligomers and aggregates.
The contribution of the lysosomal system to catabolism and intracellular clearance (autophagy)
has been known for more than half a century, since the description of this organelle by deDuve .
However, until recently, the understanding of the pathophysiology of autophagy advanced at a
very slow pace compared to that of other quality control mechanisms. The most important
propellers of the current advances in the autophagy field were three simultaneous yeast genetic
studies initiated 10 years ago, which identified the first autophagy related genes (ATG). The
numbers of ATG genes have escalated to include >30 and the majority are conserved throughout
evolution. The possibility of genetically manipulating autophagy - through knockouts, knock-
downs and overexpression of the ATG genes - has permitted, for the first time, investigation of
the cellular consequences of changes in the activity of this pathway and a link between
autophagic malfunction and different human diseases.
Autophagy and aging: before the genetic dissection:
A decrease in proteolytic activity has been considered responsible, at least in part, for the
accumulation of damaged cellular components in almost all tissues of aging organisms. Indeed,
age-dependent alterations in the lysosomal system and declined autophagic activity were
described long before the molecular basis for this process was fully understood. Most of the early
functional studies were performed in the liver, as this was also the organ in which the most
extensive characterization of the different autophagic pathways was available. However, the
morphological features of the aging lysosomal system (e.g. expansion of lysosomal
compartments, accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and deposition of undigested material inside
lysosomes in the form of an autofluorescent pigment termed lipofuscin) were also described in
non-dividing cells of many other tissues (e.g. brain, heart, muscle and kidney). Failure of the
quality control mechanisms are particularly detrimental in post-mitotic cells, in which
distribution of damaged components to daughter cells is not possible because their cells no
longer undergo cell division.
Measurement of autophagic activity (the rate of degradation of long-lived proteins) in rodent
livers revealed an age-dependent decrease in lysosomal-mediated degradation that correlated
with an increase in damaged proteins in this organ. The reasons for this reduced
macroautophagic activity with age, at least in the liver, seem to be twofold: a defect in the
clearance of autophagic vacuoles and problems in the hormonal regulation of this type of
autophagy. The half-life of newly formed autophagosomes most likely increases because of the
inability of the secondary lysosomes to fuse and/or degrade the autophagosome cargo. Failure of
the lysosomal hydrolases, as a result of the gradual increase of lipofuscin in lysosomes and of
ϱϲ
primary damage to this compartment by toxic protein products, has been proposed to underlie the
slow clearance of autophagosomes in the aging liver. Other studies in rodent liver have identified
alterations in the response of macroautophagy to changes in circulating levels of insulin and
glucagon with age. In young organisms, the increase in glucagon levels during starvation
upregulates macroautophagy, whereas insulin, secreted as nutrients are absorbed in the gut,
enhances the mTOR-mediated repression of this pathway. The inability of glucagon to
upregulate macroautophagy in aging livers has been proposed to result from the basal signaling
activity of the insulin receptor with age, which is also enhanced by oxidative stress in the
absence of insulin. Macroautophagy deregulation in old organisms could also be a consequence
of its persistent activation because of the gradual resistance to insulin, typical of aging cells.
Although increased autophagy could be initially beneficial, its maintained activation could lead
to chronic depletion of essential autophagic components and failure to upregulate this pathway
when needed.
Studies in rodent livers also provided the first evidence that caloric restriction, the only
intervention known to effectively decelerate aging, prevented the decline of macroautophagy
activity with age. Limited dietary intake decreases the incidence of age-related disorders and
increases life span in numerous experimental models from yeast and invertebrates to mammals
including primates. The logical connection between caloric restriction and autophagy stems from
the findings that that autophagy is a catabolic process upregulated during nutrient deprivation
and that tissues from calorically restricted animals contain markedly lower levels of damaged
components when compared to age matched ad libitum fed animals. Both roles of autophagy, as
an energy source when nutrients are scarce and as a process to remove cellular damage, fit well
with the beneficial effect of caloric restriction.
The age-related decrease in the other nutritionally regulated autophagy pathway - CMA - was
also described before its molecular components were identified. Early studies in cultured primary
human fibroblasts revealed that the degradation of a selective pool of cytosolic proteins in
lysosomes (through what is now known as CMA) was gradually impaired during passage in
culture. This decrease in CMA in aging human fibroblasts was later confirmed in different
tissues of old rodents.
The new connections between autophagy, aging and life span:
Genetic screens in yeast (in the case of macroautophagy) and novel biochemical approaches (in
the case of CMA) have helped to identify the subset of genes and protein products that
participate as effectors and modulators of these autophagic pathways. Manipulations in these
genes have confirmed the tight connection between autophagy, life span and aging.
The first genetic connection between autophagy and aging was established in the worm
Caenorhabditis elegans, an organism extensively used to analyze changes in protein degradation
with age, in addition to the identification of genes that mediate life-span extension. Mutations in
different genes that reduce signaling through the equivalent of the insulin-signaling pathway in
worms, such as daf-2, can extend longevity. Knock-down of essential autophagy proteins in daf-
2 mutants drastically reduced their life-span extension. Functional autophagy has also proven
ϱϳ
necessary to attain the maximal life-span extension mediated by deletion of other genes such as
those encoding mTOR or the tumor suppressor p53, which curiously represses macroautophagy
in mammals. Likewise, factors that promote longevity in invertebrates, such as the Foxo family
of Forkhead transcription factors, upregulate macroautophagy. Indeed, macroautophagy
activation is a common feature of all the long-lived mutant worms. In contrast to the well-
established role of autophagy in the µsuperlongevity¶ of these mutant worms, the requirement of
functional autophagy for normal life span remains a controversial matter in this model. Thus,
whereas mutation of essential autophagic genes shortened the life span of wild-type worms in
some of these studies, it had no effect in others. The reasons for these discrepant results remain
to be elucidated. Regardless of this controversy, accumulation of intracellular damage and signs
of cellular aging have been observed in both worms and flies defective for essential autophagy
genes.
The role of macroautophagy in life-span extension mediated by caloric restriction was recently
genetically confirmed in C. elegans. Macroautophagy is upregulated in feeding-defective worm
mutants used to model dietary restriction and disruption of essential autophagy genes shortened
their life span. This is an interesting finding because caloric restriction further increases life span
in the long-lived insulin-signaling mutants, indicating that both interventions influence aging by
different mechanisms. Macroautophagy, thus, reveals itself as a possible common effector of
both pathways, a role probably attributable to the dual regulation of macroautophagy by insulin-
signaling and mTOR. Mutations in the TOR pathway increase life span in invertebrates, but
these mutants no longer respond to caloric restriction, thereby supporting the idea that
attenuation of TOR signaling is part of the downstream mechanism involved in the beneficial
effects of caloric restriction. TOR is a negative regulator of macroautophagy that signals as a
downstream kinase of the insulin-signaling pathway. However, insulin-independent signaling
through TOR is possible because this kinase is also activated by nutrients and growth factors.
Blockage of this last signaling mechanism is probably responsible for maintained activation of
macroautophagy during caloric restriction. Interestingly, although macroautophagy is required
for life-span extension in all these long-lived worm mutants, at least in worms, it is not sufficient
and it probably acts in parallel with other downstream pathways.
The identification of the different molecular components of CMA has facilitated a better
understanding of the reasons for the declined activity of this type of autophagy with age. Indeed,
a step-by-step comparative analysis of CMA in livers of young and old rodents revealed that
substrate recognition by the cytosolic chaperones, targeting to the lysosomal membrane and
degradation in the lysosomal lumen are preserved until late in life. The problem, however, lies in
the binding and lysosomal translocation of the substrate proteins because of progressively lower
levels of the CMA receptor at the lysosomal membrane with age. This defect - also confirmed in
other tissues of old rodents and in human aging fibroblasts - is not because of transcriptional
downregulation of this receptor, but instead it is a consequence of instability of this protein once
it reaches the lysosomal membrane. Changes with age, probably in the lipid composition of the
ϱϴ
lysosomal membrane, are behind the instability of the CMA receptor, LAMP-2A, in old
organisms.
Consequences of autophagic failure in aging:
In light of the myriad of physiological functions of autophagy, it is easy to infer that the
described age-related decline in autophagic activity will affect normal cell functioning and
contribute to different aspects of the aging phenotype. Recent studies using tissue-specific
conditional autophagy-knockout mice have confirmed the important role of this catabolic process
in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis and proper response to stress. Thus far, changes in
life span and health span have not been analyzed in these rodents with impaired autophagy.
However, worms and flies with defective autophagy have decreased life span and earlier features
of cellular aging. An important limitation of the studies both in invertebrates and in mammals is
that autophagic blockage is induced early in life, whereas the age-dependent decrease in this
pathway does not begin in most organisms until middle age. It is, thus, possible that
compensatory mechanisms that can be activated early in life in response to the autophagic failure
are no longer possible late in life, resulting in even more dramatic consequences. In support of
this possibility, recent studies in mouse models with temporally controlled knockout of an
essential autophagy gene in the heart have revealed that autophagic impairment early in
development does not result in altered heart function, unless these animals are exposed to
additional stress. By contrast, autophagic blockage late in adulthood results in marked heart
failure, even under normal resting conditions. Future studies on the consequences of
macroautophagic decline with age should take into account these temporal differences.
The use of LAMP-2A knockdown in cultured fibroblasts to reproduce the age-related decline in
CMA activity has confirmed the importance of this pathway in the removal of altered cytosolic
proteins and as part of the cellular response to stress. However, selective blockage of CMA in a
whole organism, to analyze the functional consequences of the accumulation of damaged
products observed in the cultured cells, has not been possible yet. The main limitation in this
respect is the fact that LAMP-2A is one of the three spliced variants of the lamp2 gene and,
consequently, knockout of the whole gene would present a more complex phenotype than that
resulting only from defective CMA. The use of RNAi against LAMP-2A in animals could help
overcome this limitation in the future.
Recently, particular attention has been dedicated to the consequences of reduced
macroautophagy and CMA with age in the progression of the so called age-related disorders. The
fact that alterations in cellular homeostasis or in the cellular response to stress are common to
many of these late-onset disorders explains why alterations in autophagy are often found to
underlie the basis of these pathologies and/or act as aggravating factors in the course of the
disease.
ϱϵ
ϲϬ
Autophagy was first described in 1962 when researchers noted an increase in the number of
lysosomes (the part of the cell that destroys stuff) in rat liver cells after infusing glucagon. The
Nobel Prize winning scientist Christian de Duve coined the term autophagy. Damaged sub
cellular parts and unused proteins become marked for destruction and then sent to the lysosomes
to finish the job.
One of the key regulators of autophagy is the kinase called mammalian target of rapamycin
(mTOR). When mTOR is activated, it suppresses autophagy, and when dormant, it promotes it.
The same process also happens at a sub-cellular level. You don¶t necessarily need to replace the
entire car. Sometimes, you just need to replace the battery, throw out the old one and get a new
one. This also happens in the cells. Instead of killing off the entire cell (apoptosis), you only
want to replace some cell parts. That is the process of autophagy, where sub-cellular organelles
are destroyed and new ones are rebuilt to replace it. Old cell membranes, organelles and other
cellular debris can be removed. This is done by sending it to the lysosome which is a specialized
organelle containing enzymes to degrade proteins.
Nutrient deprivation is the key activator of autophagy. Remember that glucagon is kind of the
opposite hormone to insulin. It¶s like the game we played as kids ± µopposite day¶. If insulin goes
up, glucagon goes down. If insulin goes down, glucagon goes up. As we eat, insulin goes up and
glucagon goes down. When we don¶t eat (fast) insulin goes down and glucagon goes up. This
increase in this is in essence a form of cellular cleansing. The body identifies old and
substandard cellular equipment and marks it for destruction. It is the accumulation of all this junk
that may be responsible for many of the effects of aging. glucagon stimulates the process of
autophagy. In fact, fasting (raises glucagon) provides the greatest known boost to autophagy.
Fasting is actually far more beneficial than just stimulating autophagy. It does two good things.
By stimulating autophagy, we are clearing out all our old, junky proteins and cellular parts. At
the same time, fasting also stimulates growth hormone, which tells our body to start producing
some new snazzy parts for the body. We are really giving our bodies the complete renovation.
You need to get rid of the old stuff before you can put in new stuff. Think about renovating your
kitchen. If you have old, crappy 1970s style lime green cabinets sitting around, you need to junk
them before putting in some new ones. So the process of destruction (removal) is just as
important as the process of creation. If you simply tried to put in new cabinets without taking out
the old ones, it would be pretty fugly. So fasting may in some ways reverse the aging process, by
getting rid of old cellular junk and replacing it with new parts.
Autophagy is a highly regulated process. If it runs amok, out of control, this would be
detrimental, so it must be carefully controlled. In mammalian cells, total depletion of amino
acids is a strong signal for autophagy, but the role of individual amino acids is more variable.
ϲϭ
However, the plasma amino acid levels vary only a little. Amino acid signals and growth factor /
insulin signals are thought to converge on the mTOR pathway ± sometimes called the master
regulator of nutrient signalling.
So, during autophagy, old junky cell components are broken down into the component amino
acids (the building block of proteins). What happens to these amino acids? In the early stages of
starvation, amino acid levels start to increase. It is thought that these amino acids derived from
autophagy are delivered to the liver for gluconeogenesis. They can also be broken down into
glucose through the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. The third potential fate of amino acids is to
be incorporated into new proteins.
The consequences of accumulating old junky proteins all over the place can be seen in two main
conditions ± Alzheimer¶s disease (AD) and cancer. Alzheimer¶s disease involves the
accumulation of abnormal protein ± either amyloid beta or Tau protein which gums up the brain
system. It would make sense that a process like autophagy that has the ability to clear out old
proWhat turns off autophagy? Eating. Glucose, insulin (or decreased glucagon) and proteins all
turn off this self-cleaning process. And it doesn¶t take much. Even a small amount of amino acid
(leucine) could stop autophagy cold. So this process of autophagy is unique to fasting ±
something not found in simple caloric restriction or dieting.tein could prevent the development
of AD.
There is a balance here, of course. You get sick from too much autophagy as well as too little.
Which gets us back to the natural cycle of life ± feast and fast. Not constant dieting. This allows
for cell growth during eating, and cellular cleansing during fasting ± balance. Life is all about
balance. (23)
In the endless debates over what-to-eat and what-not-to-eat, consideration of when to eat too
often gets overlooked. This is unfortunate - research shows pretty convincingly that timing our
meals intelligently can produce remarkable health benefits.
I¶m referring specifically to fasting, defined loosely as the practice of abstaining from food for
periods ranging anywhere from 12 hours to several weeks.
Intermittent fasting (IF) - the practice of regularly reducing calorie intake to zero for periods of
12-24 hours - continues to gain popularity with many IF-practitioners experiencing dramatic (and
largely effortless) improvements in cognitive function and/or body composition. (24)
Muslims always fasting one month in a year for more than 12 hours with Zero intake of food so
cancers and Alzheimer¶s disease are not common among them.
For the past 4 years or so I¶ve been following the most popular version of IF; restricting (almost)
all of my calorie consumption to a 6-hour window each day (thus doing a daily 18-hour ³fast´).
The benefits of this practice are profound, and it¶s probably the single most impactful dietary
practice I¶ve adopted in the past 5 years.
ϲϮ
Recently, however, after diving into newer research elucidating the mechanisms behind the
benefits of fasting, I¶ve changed the timing and structure of my fasts a bit in an effort to
maximize the activity of these mechanisms.
The 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went to a Japanese gentleman by the name of
Yoshinori Ohsumi for his discoveries of the mechanisms behind autophagy, a cellular
maintenance process - stimulated by fasting - that is critical in disease resistance, longevity and
general body and brain vitality.
To vastly (but not inaccurately) oversimplify: healthy cells are actively autophagic, unhealthy
cells are not.
The changes I¶ve made to my own fasting protocol were specifically intended to increase
stimulation of autophagy. Before going into these let¶s first look at the ridiculously-long list of
beneficial metabolic and hormonal processes stimulated by fasting, which should make it pretty
clear why I consider fasting to be an indispensable practice for anyone that values body and brain
performance.
Improved Brain Health/Cognition - There are a set of metabolic processes neurologists will tell
you are essential for maintaining a healthy, high-performing brain, and fasting stimulates
essentially all of them.
Fasting increases circulating levels of several neurotrophic factors, biomolecules that support the
growth, survival, and differentiation of neurons. The result is enhanced network plasticity
(critical for learning), increased stress resilience and increased mitochondria (i.e. increased
cognitive energy). Fasting also reduces oxidative stress (and thus, inflammation) in the brain
both by stimulating the removal of damaged molecules and stimulating production of
ϲϯ
ϲϰ
toxic chemical soup that works by (hopefully) killing cancerous cells ever-so-slightly faster than
it kills the recipient. Why is this not more used in oncology?
At minimum, a fasting protocol should be used in addition to chemotherapy, as it has been
shown to preferentially protect non-cancerous cells from chemo drugs.
Autophagy deserves special attention here, as a case can be made it¶s the single most important
metabolic process to select for if the aim is to slow the aging process and promote a high-
performing body and brain. You don¶t win a Nobel Prize in medicine unless you¶re working on
something that legitimately has the potential to change humanity.
Autophagy is still relatively obscure outside the biochemistry/cell bio/endocrinology worlds, but
my intuition (and hope) is that it will receive increasing attention in mainstream natural health
and nutrition media over the next 5 years or so.
As Yoshinori Ohsumi and others have described, autophagy is the process by which cells
degrade and then recycle unneeded or dysfunctional proteins and organelles (via lysosomes).
If allowed to accumulate, dysfunctional proteins and organelles eventually lead to dysfunctional
cells that either die, persist as dysfunctional cells (contributing to poor tissue/organ function) or
become cancerous. Needless to say, all of these outcomes are in opposition to a youthful, vibrant,
high-performing body and brain.
In the brain, upregulation of autophagy is strongly neuroprotective while disruption of autophagy
causes neurodegeneration. In the liver, upregulation of autophagy increases lipolysis (fat usage)
and insulin sensitivity, while disruption of autophagy leads to prediabetes and metabolic
syndrome. The list goes on, but I think you get the point: autophagy is important.
Fasting To Maximize Autophagy
Fasting has been shown to be, far and away, the most effective way to stimulate autophagy in
both the body and brain. Despite this, there¶s not a clear consensus on exactly how long to fast
for to maximize autophagy.
I located a few studies that looked at the level of autophagy occurring in both the liver and brain,
and there were some clear patterns when looking at the data of each.
The level of autophagy activity can be measured by simply counting the number of
autophagosomes (the cellular organelles that degrade dysfunctional proteins), as these will
increase in number when autophagy is stimulated.
The study looking at liver cells found that the number of autophagosomes increased 300% after
24 hours of fasting, and a further 30% after 48 hours of fasting. Studies looking at
autophagosomes in brain cells had a similar findings.
In addition to looking at the number of autophagosomes in a cell, the brain study looked at a
handful of metabolic markers that are indicative of autophagy being stimulated. Almost of these
markers peaked between 24 and 36 hours, explaining why the increase in autophagosomes
between 24 and 48 hours is substantially less than between hours 0 and 24.
ϲϱ
My take-away from this is that while there is certainly value in fasting longer, there also seems to
be an element of diminishing returns once a fast passes the 36 hour mark. As such, I¶ve designed
my fasting protocol to get close to the 36 hour mark with as little stress and discomfort as
possible. More on this in a bit.
Psychological Benefits
A quick word on the utility and value of fasting. It feels incomplete to express the benefits of
fasting simply as ³stimulation of autophagy´ or ³increased neurotrophic factors´, etc.
Talk to anyone who fasts on a regular basis and it will be clear that there is more to derive from
the experience than simply an abstract understanding that you¶re ³doing something healthy.´
There is an undeniable physical and emotional high that comes with fasting. Almost everyone
gets this the day following a fast, and for a lot of people, there is a high in the fasting period that
outweighs the slight discomfort of an empty stomach.
I think the reason for this it two-fold - yes, stimulating dozens of vitality-promoting metabolic
processes surely contributes to the sense of wellbeing, but I think the psychological component is
even more important.
Fasting requires an element of self-mastery. Most of us are conditioned both psychologically and
hormonally to be eating multiple times during the day, and any deviation from this causes people
to get cranky. This is not healthy.
Fasting also requires us to be present with the initial discomfort of not stuffing our faces every
time we feel like it. This is a reversal of the typical power structure in body-brain relations. It
puts us in the position of consciously making the decision to eat or not to eat, rather than our
stomach (aka hormones) effectively making that decision for us.
Almost all of us would benefit hugely from consciously redefining our relationship to food, and
fasting is a powerful opportunity to do this redefinition. (24)
ϲϲ
ϲϳ
ϲϴ
fluorescent autophagy reporter has not been used extensively to study autophagy in the brain in
prior studies (despite widespread use in other tissues). However, we found that the use of
spectral unmixing (which separates the wavelengths of background auto-fluorescence from the
wavelength of GFP) allowed us to detect authentic GFP-LC3 puncta. We also confirmed this
finding by performing immunostaining with an anti-GFP antibody. Of note, we did not detect
significant increases in GFP-LC3 puncta in regions of the brain besides the cerebral cortex,
including the olfactory bulb, hypothalamus, midbrain or cerebellum (data not shown). We cannot
rule out the possibility that other methods of sample preparation, similar to those used in recent
reports that have detected increased GFP-LC3 puncta in the brains of mice subjected to
starvation, might be more sensitive and detect autophagy induction in other regions of the brain.
There are numerous additional questions that remain to be answered. For example, the precise
molecular mechanisms that cause altered glucose metabolism in autophagy-deficient mice
remain unknown. Another open question is whether exercise-induced autophagy contributes to
the beneficial effects of exercise on diseases other than diabetes, such as aging, cancer,
cardiovascular diseases, inflammatory diseases and neurodegenerative diseases. Based on our
new data that exercise can induce autophagy in certain regions of the brain, it will be important
to investigate the physiological consequences of this phenomenon. Of note, autophagy is an
important ³housekeeping´ mechanism that eliminates protein aggregates and damaged organelles
ϲϵ
in neurons, and exercise is an intervention that improves neuronal synaptic plasticity, promotes
adult neurogenesis, prevents cognitive decline in aging, and delays the onset of
neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, a crucial question is whether exercise-induced autophagy in
the brain mediates some of these neuroprotective effects. Another intriguing question is whether
the signals that trigger exercise-induced autophagy in the brain are cell-autonomous or derived
from extrinsic systemic cues. (25)
Want to Clean Up Cellular Garbage? Train Fasted!
Exercise is a stressor. It modifies the intra and extracellular milieu, impairs the energetic status
and stretches, sometimes even over-stretches the membranes. That certainly sounds as if you
want to avoid it at all costs, but as nature had it, it is this eustress (good stress) that is absolutely
essential for the remodeling of the muscle we are all working out for to happen - no stress no
reason to adapt. It's that simple and does still have one major caveat: Too much stress and the
adaptation turns into a constant and often insufficient repair process.
But who wants to "deconstruct" muscle, anyway?
Now, from the gymbro perspective the most important aspect of the training induced adaptation
processes would probably be protein synthesis. And while you can actually argue that this was
the case if things were just about "growing", a different picture emerges, when you look at health
benefits and the actual remodeling process which does necessarily begin with "demodeling", or
rather the demolution of old muscle tissue - when that's happening in a controlled self-induced
(by the cell) manner, scientists call this process autophagy.
Autophagy is one of the main reasons fasting is good for you
Now, when cells "kill" themselves, they usually do that for a reason. In fact, the process of
autophagy must be seen as part of the general housekeeping - a part with enormous importance,
as one of the possible consequences of its failure is cancer. Moreover, it has been demonstrated
only recently that autophagy is also an essential process for muscle adaptation:
"Autophagy is activated in skeletal muscle by numerous catabolic stimuli such as food
deprivation, denervation or sepsis. However, evidence for the necessity of basal autophagy level
in the maintenance of myofibrillar integrity has counterbalanced the vision of a system only
implicated in muscle wasting. Very recently, the activation of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway
has emerged as an essential process for skeletal muscle adaptation after endurance training.
In 2011 van Proeyen et al. observed that training fasted does not only increase the intramuscular
fatty acid oxidation in 20 healthy young volunteers, it did also and this may come as a surprise,
prevent "the development exercise-induced drop in blood glucose concentration, the same drop
in blood sugar that will make you feel exhausted and is a potential risk factor for an acceleration
of the metabolic downregulation that occurs, whenever you are dieting. One year before van
Proeyen et al. had already established that in times of high fat overfeeding (+30%kcal; 50% fat)
only fasted training was able to increase the AMPK levels (=anti-cancer, anti-diabetic, anti-
obesity effect) in young men.
ϳϬ
Said study by van Proyen was by the way the first to prove that fasted training is more potent
than fed training to facilitate adaptations in muscle and to improve whole-body glucose tolerance
and insulin sensitivity during hyper-caloric fat-rich diet. So, I suggest you remember it, when
you wake up tomorrow and think about whether you should go for a run now or rather after
filling up your belly with some delicious eggs or whatever it is that you have for breakfast. (26)
ϳϭ
References:
1-http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/21/22/2861.full
2-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616322/
3-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990190/
4-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900135
5-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20935516
6-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20649543
7-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25665094
8-https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/2013/193757/
9-https://academic.oup.com/mend/article/29/3/338/2556194/Minireview-Autophagy-in-
Pancreatic-Cells-and-Its
10-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24882754
11-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4590644/
12-http://www.fasebj.org/content/25/1_Supplement/1095.2
13-http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925443914001483
14-https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/cardiac-autophagy-in-diabetic-cardiomyopathy-
2167-7662.1000e110.php?aid=8123
15-http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2015.6322?journalCode=ars
16-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3285235/
17-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18376138
18-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17982686
19-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460576/
20-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866167/
21-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4813194/
22-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745226/
23-https://www.dietdoctor.com/renew-body-fasting-autophagy
24-https://besynchro.com/blogs/blog/the-profound-benefits-of-fasting-and-autophagy
25-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3463459/
26-http://suppversity.blogspot.com/2013/08/want-to-clean-up-cellular-garbage-train.html
ϳϮ
ϳϯ
View publication stats