Deterministic Risk Analysis - "Best Case, Worst Case, Most Likely"
Deterministic Risk Analysis - "Best Case, Worst Case, Most Likely"
Deterministic Risk Analysis - "Best Case, Worst Case, Most Likely"
Worst case scenario – All costs are the highest possible value, and sales revenues are the lowest of possible
projections. The outcome is losing money.
Best case scenario – All costs are the lowest possible value, and sales revenues are the highest of possible
projections. The outcome is making a lot of money.
Most likely scenario – Values are chosen in the middle for costs and revenue, and the outcome shows making a
moderate amount of money.
It gives equal weight to each outcome. That is, no attempt is made to assess the likelihood of each
outcome.
Interdependence between inputs, impact of different inputs relative to the outcome, and other nuances
are ignored, oversimplifying the model and reducing its accuracy.
Yet despite its drawbacks and inaccuracies, many organizations operate using this type of analysis.
Normal – Or “bell curve.” The user simply defines the mean or expected value and a standard deviation to
describe the variation about the mean. Values in the middle near the mean are most likely to occur. It is
symmetric and describes many natural phenomena such as people’s heights. Examples of variables described
by normal distributions include inflation rates and energy prices.
Lognormal – Values are positively skewed, not symmetric like a normal distribution. It is used to represent values
that don’t go below zero but have unlimited positive potential. Examples of variables described by lognormal
distributions include real estate property values, stock prices, and oil reserves.
Uniform – All values have an equal chance of occurring, and the user simply defines the minimum and maximum.
Examples of variables that could be uniformly distributed include manufacturing costs or future sales revenues
for a new product.
Triangular – The user defines the minimum, most likely, and maximum values. Values around the most likely are
more likely to occur. Variables that could be described by a triangular distribution include past sales history per
unit of time and inventory levels.
PERT- The user defines the minimum, most likely, and maximum values, just like the triangular distribution.
Values around the most likely are more likely to occur. However values between the most likely and extremes are
more likely to occur than the triangular; that is, the extremes are not as emphasized. An example of the use of a
PERT distribution is to describe the duration of a task in a project management model.
Discrete – The user defines specific values that may occur and the likelihood of each. An example might be the
results of a lawsuit: 20% chance of positive verdict, 30% change of negative verdict, 40% chance of settlement,
and 10% chance of mistrial.
During a Monte Carlo simulation, values are sampled at random from the input probability distributions. Each set
of samples is called an iteration, and the resulting outcome from that sample is recorded. Monte Carlo simulation
does this hundreds or thousands of times, and the result is a probability distribution of possible outcomes. In this
way, Monte Carlo simulation provides a much more comprehensive view of what may happen. It tells you not
only what could happen, but how likely it is to happen.
Probabilistic Results. Results show not only what could happen, but how likely each outcome is.
Graphical Results. Because of the data a Monte Carlo simulation generates, it’s easy to create graphs
of different outcomes and their chances of occurrence. This is important for communicating findings to
other stakeholders.
Sensitivity Analysis. With just a few cases, deterministic analysis makes it difficult to see which variables
impact the outcome the most. In Monte Carlo simulation, it’s easy to see which inputs had the biggest
effect on bottom-line results.
Scenario Analysis. In deterministic models, it’s very difficult to model different combinations of values for
different inputs to see the effects of truly different scenarios. Using Monte Carlo simulation, analysts
can see exactly which inputs had which values together when certain outcomes occurred. This is
invaluable for pursuing further analysis.
Correlation of Inputs. In Monte Carlo simulation, it’s possible to model interdependent relationships
between input variables. It’s important for accuracy to represent how, in reality, when some factors
goes up, others go up or down accordingly.
Email Article
Feedback
Reprints
Share
Filed Under: Financial Theory, Insurance, Options
Research analysts use multivariate models to forecast investment outcomes to understand the
possibilities surrounding their investment exposures and to better mitigate risks. Monte Carlo analysis
is one specific multivariate modeling technique that allows researchers to run multiple trials and define
all potential outcomes of an event or investment. Running a Monte Carlo model creates a probability
distribution or risk assessment for a given investment or event under review. By comparing results
against risk tolerances, managers can decide whether to proceed with certain investments or projects.
(To learn more about Monte Carlo basics, see Introduction To Monte Carlo Simulation and Monte
Carlo Simulation With GBM.)
Multivariate Models
Multivariate models can be thought of as complex, "What if?" scenarios. By changing
the value of multiple variables, the modeler can ascertain his or her impact on the
estimate being evaluated. These models are used by financial analysts to estimate
cash flows and new product ideas. Portfolio managers and financial advisors use
these models to determine the impact of investments on portfolio performance and
risk. Insurance companies use these models to estimate the potential for claims and
to price policies. Some of the best-known multivariate models are those used to
value stock options. Multivariate models also help analysts determine the true drivers
of value.
Monte Carlo analysis is useful for analysts because many investment and business
decisions are made on the basis of one outcome. In other words, many analysts
derive one possible scenario and then compare it to return hurdles to decide whether
to proceed. Most pro forma estimates start with a base case. By inputting the highest
probability assumption for each factor, an analyst can actually derive the highest
probability outcome. However, making any decisions on the basis of a base case is
problematic, and creating a forecast with only one outcome is insufficient because it
says nothing about any other possible values that could occur. It also says nothing
about the very real chance that the actual future value will be something other than
the base case prediction. It is impossible to hedge or insure against a negative
occurrence if the drivers and probabilities of these events are not calculated in
advance. (To learn more about how to manage the risk in your portfolio, see our
Risk and Diversification tutorial.)
The art in developing an appropriate Monte Carlo model is to determine the correct
constraints for each variable and the correct relationship between variables. For
example, because portfolio diversification is based on the correlation between
assets, any model developed to create expected portfolio values must include the
correlation between investments. (To learn more, read The Importance of
Diversification.)
In order to choose the correct distribution for a variable, one must understand each
of the possible distributions available. For example, the most common one is a
normal distribution, also known as a bell curve. In a normal distribution, all the
occurrences are equally distributed (symmetrical) around the mean. The mean is the
most probable event. Natural phenomena, people's heights and inflation are some
examples of inputs that are normally distributed.
In the Monte Carlo analysis, a random-number generator picks a random value for
each variable (within the constraints set by the model) and produces a probability
distribution for all possible outcomes. The standard deviation of that probability is a
statistic that denotes the likelihood that the actual outcome being estimated will be
something other than the mean or most probable event. Assuming a probability
distribution is normally distributed, approximately 68% of the values will
fall within one standard deviation of the mean, about 95% of the values will fall within
two standard deviations and about 99.7 % will lie within three standard deviations of
the mean. This is known as the "68-95-99.7 rule" or the "empirical rule".
Examples
Let us take for example two separate, normally distributed probability distributions
derived from random-factor analysis or from multiple scenarios of a Monte Carlo
model.
Copyright © 2008 Investopedia.com
Figure 1
In both of the probability distributions (Figure 1), the expected value or base cases both equal 200.
Without having performed scenario analysis, there would be no way to compare these two estimates
and one could mistakenly conclude that they were equally beneficial. (To learn more, read Scenario
Analysis Provides Glimpse of Portfolio Potential.)
In the two probability distributions, both have the same mean but one has a standard deviation of 100, while the
other has a standard deviation of 200. This means that in the first scenario analysis there is a 68% chance that
the outcome will be some number between 100 and 300, while in the second model there is a 68% chance that
the outcome will be between 0 and 400. With all things being equal, the one with a standard deviation of 100
has the better risk-adjusted outcome. Here, by using Monte Carlo to derive the probability distributions, the
analysis has given an investor a basis by which to compare the two initiatives.
Monte Carlo analysis can also help determine whether certain initiatives should be taken on by looking at the
risk and return consequences of taking certain actions. Let us assume we want to place debt on our original
investment.
Copyright © 2008 Investopedia.com
Figure 2
The distributions in Figure 2 show the original outcome and the outcome after modeling the effects of
leverage. Our new leveraged analysis shows an increase in the expected value from 200 to 400, but
with an increased financial risk of debt. Debt has increased the expected value by 200 but also the
standard deviation. Before 1 standard deviation was a range from 100 to 300. Now with debt, 68% of
values (1 standard deviation) fall between 0 and 400. By using scenario analysis an investor can now
determine whether the additional increase in return equals or outweighs the additional risk (variability
of potential outcomes) that comes with taking on the new initiative.
Conclusion
Monte Carlo analyses are not only conducted by finance professionals but also by many other
businesses. It is a decision-making tool that integrates the concept that every decision will have some
impact on overall risk. Every individual and institution has different risk/return tolerances. As such, it is
important that the risk/return profile of any investment be calculated and compared to risk tolerances.
The probability distributions produced by a Monte Carlo model create a picture of risk. A picture is an
easy way to convey the idea to others, such as superiors or prospective investors. Because of
advances in software, very complex Monte Carlo models can be designed and executed by anyone
with access to a personal computer.
Robert Stammers, CFA, uncovers and analyzes stock and option trading opportunities as a senior
equity analyst at stock market education company BetterTrades. Previously, he was portfolio
manager for a $1 billion enhanced real estate fund, a public timber fund and multiple pension fund
separate accounts, while acting as a senior executive for several institutional fund managers. Mr.
Stammers holds The CFA Institute's Chartered Financial Analyst designation, a Bachelor of Arts in
economics from Connecticut College, and a Master of Business Administration with honors from
Emory University. Visit Bettertrades.com to learn more timely strategies and tactics for creating cash
flow with stocks and options.
The continuous rate associated with a holding period is found by taking the natural log of 1 + holding-
period return) Say the holding period is one year and holding-period return is 12%:
In other words, if 11.33% were continuously compounded, its effective rate of return would be about
12%.
Earlier we found that 12% compounded hourly comes to about 12.7496%. In fact, e (the
transcendental number) raised to the 0.12 power yields 12.7497% (approximately).
As we've stated previously, actual calculations of natural logs are not likely for answering a question
as they give an unfair advantage to those with higher function calculators. At the same time, an exam
problem can test knowledge of a relationship without requiring the calculation. For example, a
question could ask:
Q. A portfolio returned 5% over one year, if continuously compounded, this is equivalent to
____?
A. ln 5
B. ln 1.05
C. e5
D. e1.05
The answer would be B based on the definition of continuous compounding. A financial function
calculator or spreadsheet could yield the actual percentage of 4.879%, but wouldn't be necessary to
answer the question correctly on the exam.
Monte Carlo simulations are used in a number of applications, often as a complement to other risk-
assessment techniques in an effort to further define potential risk. For example, a pension-benefit
administrator in charge of managing assets and liabilities for a large plan may use computer software
with Monte Carlo simulation to help understand any potential downside risk over time, and how
changes in investment policy (e.g. higher or lower allocations to certain asset classes, or the
introduction of a new manager) may affect the plan. While traditional analysis focuses on returns,
variances and correlations between assets, a Monte Carlo simulation can help introduce other
pertinent economic variables (e.g. interest rates, GDP growth and foreign exchange rates) into the
simulation.
Monte Carlo simulations are also important in pricing derivative securities for which there are no
existing analytical methods. European- and Asian-style options are priced with Monte Carlo methods,
as are certain mortgage-backed securities for which the embedded options (e.g. prepayment
assumptions) are very complex.
A general outline for developing a Monte Carlo simulation involves the following steps (please note
that we are oversimplifying a process that is often highly technical):
1. Identify all variables about which we are interested, the time horizon of the analysis and the
distribution of all risk factors associated with each variable.
2. Draw K random numbers using a spreadsheet generator. Each random variable would then
be standardized so we have Z1, Z2, Z3... ZK.
3. Simulate the possible values of the random variable by calculating its observed value with Z 1,
Z2, Z3... ZK.
4. Following a large number of iterations, estimate each variable and quantity of interest to
complete one trial. Go back and complete additional trials to develop more accurate
estimates.
Historical Simulation
Historical simulation, or back simulation, follows a similar process for large numbers of iterations, with
historical simulation drawing from the previous record of that variable (e.g. past returns for a mutual
fund). While both of these methods are very useful in developing a more meaningful and in-depth
analysis of a complex system, it's important to recognize that they are basically statistical estimates;
that is, they are not as analytical as (for example) the use of a correlation matrix to understand
portfolio returns. Such simulations tend to work best when the input risk parameters are well defined.
Monte Carlo Simulation With GBM
by David Harper,CFA, FRM (Contact Author | Biography)
Email Article
Feedback
Reprints
Share
Filed Under: Financial Theory
One of the most common ways to estimate risk is the use of a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). For
example, to calculate the value at risk (VaR) of a portfolio, we can run a Monte Carlo simulation that
attempts to predict the worst likely loss for a portfolio given a confidence interval over a specified time
horizon - we always need to specify two conditions for VaR: confidence and horizon. (For related
reading, see The Uses And Limits Of Volatility and Introduction To Value At Risk (VAR) - Part 1 and
Part 2.)
In this article, we will review a basic MCS applied to a stock price. We
need a model to specify the behavior of the stock price, and we'll use one of the most common
models in finance: geometric Brownian motion (GBM). Therefore, while Monte Carlo simulation can
refer to a universe of different approaches to simulation, we will start here with the most basic.
Where to Start
A Monte Carlo simulation is an attempt to predict the future many times over. At the end of the
simulation, thousands or millions of "random trials" produce a distribution of outcomes that can be
analyzed. The basics steps are:
The formula for GBM is found below, where "S" is the stock price, "m" (the Greek mu) is the expected
return, "s" (Greek sigma) is the standard deviation of returns, "t" is time, and "e" (Greek epsilon) is the random
variable:
If we rearrange the formula to solve just for the change in stock price, we see that GMB says the change in stock
price is the stock price "S" multiplied by the two terms found inside the parenthesis below:
The first term is a "drift" and the second term is a "shock". For each time period, our model assumes the price
will "drift" up by the expected return. But the drift will be shocked (added or subtracted) by a random shock.
The random shock will be the standard deviation "s" multiplied by a random number "e". This is simply a way
of scaling the standard deviation.
That is the essence of GBM, as illustrated in Figure 1. The stock price follows a series of steps, where each step
is a drift plus/minus a random shock (itself a function of the stock's standard deviation):
Figure 1
In this case, let's assume that the stock begins on day zero with a price of $10. Here is a chart of the outcome
where each time step (or interval) is one day and the series runs for ten days (in summary: forty trials with daily
steps over ten days):
Figure 2: Geometric Brownian Motion
The result is forty simulated stock prices at the end of 10 days. None has happened to fall below $9,
and one is above $11.
If we stack the illustrated outcomes into bins (each bin is one-third of $1, so three bins covers the interval from
$9 to $10), we'll get the following histogram:
Figure 3
Remember that our GBM model assumes normality: price returns are normally distributed with
expected return (mean) "m" and standard deviation "s". Interestingly, our histogram isn't looking
normal. In fact, with more trials, it will not tend toward normality. Instead, it will tend toward a
lognormal distribution: a sharp drop off to the left of mean and a highly skewed "long tail" to the right
of the mean. This often leads to a potentially confusing dynamic for first-time students:
Summary
A Monte Carlo simulation applies a selected model (a model that specifies the behavior of an
instrument) to a large set of random trials in an attempt to produce a plausible set of possible future
outcomes. In regard to simulating stock prices, the most common model is geometric Brownian
motion (GBM). GBM assumes that a constant drift is accompanied by random shocks. While the
period returns under GBM are normally distributed, the consequent multi-period (for example, ten
days) price levels are lognormally distributed.
Check out David Harper's movie tutorial, Monte Carlo Simulation with Geometric Brownian Motion, to
learn more on this topic.
In addition to writing for Investopedia, David Harper, CFA, FRM, is the founder of The Bionic Turtle, a
site that trains professionals in advanced and career-related finance, including financial certification.
David was a founding co-editor of the Investopedia Advisor, where his original portfolios (core, growth
and technology value) led to superior outperformance (+35% in the first year) with minimal risk and
helped to successfully launch Advisor.
He is the principal of Investor Alternatives, a firm that conducts quantitative research, consulting
(derivatives valuation), litigation support and financial education.
Feedback
Share
11.18 - Risk-Analysis Techniques
It is important to keep in mind that when a company analyzes a potential project, it is forecasting
potential not actual cash flows for a project. As we all know, forecasts are based on assumptions that
may be incorrect. It is therefore important for a company to perform a sensitivity analysis on its
assumptions to get a better sense of the overall risk of the project the company is about to take.
There are three risk-analysis techniques that should be known for the exam:
1.Sensitivity analysis
2.Scenario analysis
3.Monte Carlo simulation
1.Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is simply the method for determining how sensitive our NPV analysis is to changes
in our variable assumptions. To begin a sensitivity analysis, we must first come up with a base-case
scenario. This is typically the NPV using assumptions we believe are most accurate. From there, we
can change various assumptions we had initially made based on other potential assumptions. NPV is
then recalculated, and the sensitivity of the NPV based on the change in assumptions is determined.
Depending on our confidence in our assumptions, we can determine how potentially risky a project
can be.
2.Scenario Analysis
Scenario analysis takes sensitivity analysis a step further. Rather than just looking at the sensitivity of
our NPV analysis to changes in our variable assumptions, scenario analysis also looks at the
probability distribution of the variables. Like sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis starts with the
construction of a base case scenario. From there, other scenarios are considered, known as the
"best-case scenario" and the "worst-case scenario". Probabilities are assigned to the scenarios and
computed to arrive at an expected value. Given its simplicity, scenario analysis is one the most
frequently used risk-analysis techniques.
Quantitative Analysis
Although quantitative analysis is a powerful tool for evaluating investments, it rarely tells a complete
story without the help of its opposite - qualitative analysis. In financial circles, quantitative analysts are
affectionately referred to as "quants", "quant jockeys" or "rocket scientists".
Monte Carlo Simulation
The bell curve is also known as a normal distribution. The bell curve is less commonly referred to as a
Gaussian distribution, after German mathematician and physicist Karl Gauss, who popularized the
model in the scientific community by using it to analyze astronomical data.
Mean
What Does Mean Mean?
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of
numbers can be computed in more than one way, including the arithmetic mean method, which uses
the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method. However, all of the primary
methods for computing a simple average of a normal number series produce the same approximate
result most of the time.
In contrast, the geometric mean would be computed as third root of the numbers' product, or the third
root of 137,700, which approximately equals $51.64. While the two numbers are not exactly equal,
most people consider arithmetic and geometric means to be equivalent for everyday purposes.
Arithmetic Mean
Winsorized means are expressed in two ways. A "k th" winsorized mean refers to the replacement of
the 'k' smallest and largest observations, where 'k' is an integer. A "X%" winsorized mean involves
replacing a given percentage of values from both ends of the data.
The geometric mean must be used when working with percentages (which are derived from values),
whereas the standard arithmetic mean will work with the values themselves.
2. A bond's average price is calculated by adding its face value to the price paid for it and dividing the
sum by two. The average price is sometimes used in determining a bond's yield to maturity where the
average price replaces the purchase price in the yield to maturity calculation.
2. Although the average price of a bond is not the most accurate method to find its YTM, it does give
investors a rough and simple gauge to find out what a bond is worth.
Moving Average - MA
What Does Moving Average - MA Mean?
An indicator frequently used in technical analysis showing the average value of a security's price over
a set period. Moving averages are generally used to measure momentum and define areas of
possible support and resistance.
Generally, when you hear the term "moving average", it is in reference to a simple moving average.
This can be important, especially when comparing to an exponential moving average (EMA).
Linearly Weighted Moving Average
What Does Linearly Weighted Moving Average Mean?
A type of moving average that assigns a higher weighting to recent price data than does the common
simple moving average. This average is calculated by taking each of the closing prices over a given
time period and multiplying them by its certain position in the data series. Once the position of the
time periods have been accounted for they are summed together and divided by the sum of the
number of time periods.
The linearly weighted moving average was one of the first responses to placing a greater importance
on recent data. The popularity of this moving average has been diminished by the exponential moving
average, but none the less it still proves to be very useful
To average these values, do a weighted average using the number of occurrences of each value as
the weight. To calculate a weighted average:
1. Multiply each value by its weight. (Ans: 20, 16, 5, 40, 24, 14, 68, and 0)
2. Add up the products of value times weight to get the total value. (Ans: Sum=187)
3. Add the weight themselves to get the total weight. (Ans: Sum=100)
4. Divide the total value by the total weight. (Ans: 187/100 = 1.87 = average value of a Scrabble
tile)
Price-Weighted Index
In this case, a change in the value of the $1 stock will not affect the index's value by a large amount,
because it makes up such a small percentage of the index.
A popular price-weighted stock market index is the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It includes a price-
weighted average of 30 actively traded blue chip stocks.
Dow Jones Industrial Average - DJIA
When the TV networks say "the market is up today", they are generally referring to the Dow.
Weighted Average Cost of Equity - WACE
In turn, an accurate measure of the cost of capital is essential when a firm is trying to decide if a future
project will be profitable or not.
Investopedia explains Weighted Average Cost of Equity - WACE
Here is an example of how to calculate the WACE:
First, calculate the cost of new common stock, the cost of preferred stock and the cost of retained
earnings. Lets assume we have already done this and the cost of common stock, preferred stock and
retained earnings are 24%, 10% and 20% respectively.
Now, you must calculate the portion of total equity that is occupied by each form of equity. Again, lets
assume this is 50%, 25% and 25%, for common stock, preferred stock and retained earnings
respectively.
Finally, you multiply the cost of each form of equity by its respective portion of total equity and sum of
the values - which results in the WACE. Our example results in a WACE of 19.5%.
What Does Standard & Poor's 500 Index - S&P 500 Mean?
An index of 500 stocks chosen for market size, liquidity and industry grouping, among other factors.
The S&P 500 is designed to be a leading indicator of U.S. equities and is meant to reflect the
risk/return characteristics of the large cap universe.
Companies included in the index are selected by the S&P Index Committee, a team of analysts and
economists at Standard & Poor's. The S&P 500 is a market value weighted index - each stock's
weight is proportionate to its market value.
Other popular Standard & Poor's indexes include the S&P 600, an index of small cap companies
with market capitalizations between $300 million and $2 billion, and the S&P 400, an index of mid cap
companies with market capitalizations of $2 billion to $10 billion.
A number of financial products based on the S&P 500 are available to investors. These include index
funds and exchange-traded funds. However, it would be difficult for individual investors to buy the
index, as this would entail buying 500 different stocks.
Free-Float Methodology
Calculated as:
Free-float methodology has been adopted by most of the world's major indexes, including the Dow
Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500.
Nasdaq
Stocks on the Nasdaq are traditionally listed under four or five letter ticker symbols. If the company is
a transfer from the New York Stock Exchange, the symbol may be comprised of three letters.
Investopedia explains Nasdaq
The term "Nasdaq" used to be capitalized "NASDAQ" as an acronym for National Association of Securities
Dealers Automated Quotation. The acronym is no longer used and Nasdaq is now a proper noun.
The Nasdaq is traditionally home to many high-tech stocks, such as Microsoft, Intel, Dell and Cisco.
What is the difference between the Dow and the Nasdaq?
Because of the way people throw around the words "Dow" and "Nasdaq," both terms have
become synonymous with "the market," giving people a hazy idea of what each term actually
means. In this question, "the Dow" refers to the famous figure that peppers almost all business
news reports: the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), an important index that many people
watch to get an indication of how well the overall stock market is performing. The Dow, or the
DJIA, is not exactly the same as Dow Jones and Company, the firm that publishes the Wall
Street Journal. However,the editors of the Wall Street Journal are the people who maintain the
DJIA, along with other Dow Jones indices. The Nasdaq is also a term that can refer to two
different things: first, it is the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations
System, which is the first electronic exchange, where investors can buy and sell stock. Second,
when you hear people say that the "the Nasdaq is up today," they are referring to the Nasdaq
Composite Index, which, like the DJIA, is a statistical measure of a portion of the market.
Both the Dow and the Nasdaq, then, refer to an index, or an average of a bunch of numbers
derived from the price movements of certain stocks. The DJIA tracks the performance of 30
different companies that are considered major players in their industries. The Nasdaq
Composite, on the other hand, tracks approximately 4,000 stocks, all of which are traded on the
Nasdaq exchange. The DJIA is composed mainly of companies found on the NYSE, with only a
couple of Nasdaq-listed stocks.
Remember, although both "the Dow" and the "Nasdaq" refer to market indices, only the Nasdaq
also refers to an exchange where investors can buy and sell stock. Furthermore, an investor
can't trade the Dow or the Nasdaq indexes because they each represent merely a mathematical
average that people use to try and make sense of the stock market. You can, however,
purchase index funds, which are a kind of mutual fund, or exchange traded funds, which are
securities that track the indexes.
Blue Chip
Blue chip stocks are seen as a less volatile investment than owning shares in companies without blue
chip status because blue chips have an institutional status in the economy. Investors may buy blue
chip companies to provide steady growth in their portfolios. The stock price of a blue chip usually
closely follows the S&P 500.