OP-ED Consolidated Vol 8
OP-ED Consolidated Vol 8
OP-ED Consolidated Vol 8
Consolidated vol. 8
Maggubhai Op-ed bulletin
Date – 24/06/2019
Using its economic power to meet non-economic objectives is not new for the
US. Yet, the present administration has taken the stick of economic power to new
levels. President Trump’s constant demand for a border wall between the US and
Mexico has led to derision. But the need to stem the flow of people is real.
China, the second biggest trading partner after Mexico has begun accusing
the US of ‘economic terrorism.’ This is meant to encompass the whole range of
Trump’s measures against China. This includes specific company targets such as
2
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
Huawei, considered a spying threat, as also broad tariff measures. Chinese
scientists face a greater level of scrutiny when they apply for visa. Chinese
companies find it difficult to acquire technology-related businesses, and so on.
China has begun to retaliate by advising its citizens about travel to the US,
limiting rare-earth exports, and preparing a blacklist of companies that disrupt
supplies for non-commercial reasons.The WTO was meant to develop a global level-
trading field. But when the two biggest economies bypass the WTO, and use their
economic power to satisfy national non-economic goals, we are seeing a new
version of the Cold War.
3
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
focus now shifting from bitcoin to so-called stablecoins, such as Facebook's Libra,
that are backed by real-world assets.
Even as the micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME) sector continues to
face challenges including the inability to get skilled manpower, infrastructure-related
bottlenecks and difficulty in raising timely finance at economical rates, the
government is keen on creating an enabling ecosystem for the under-served sector.
With the government beginning to take baby steps in ensuring that easy, quick
and affordable capital and finance channels are available to them, lenders who have
been supporting MSMEs say that digitisation and data driven decisions have been
helping drive profitable lending and access to finance for MSMEs.
The fintech lenders are providing MSMEs access to newer sources of credit,
mostly at lower rates than earlier. Some of them have partnered with banks and
NBFCs to lend to customers. The lenders have also upped the bar on customer
experience in terms of process ease as well as turn-around-time involved in credit
decisioning and disbursement.
Expert panel suggests ways to achieve $5 trillion economy target: Niti Aayog
4
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
economy target. Improvement of governance in PSU banks, enhancing growth rate of
exports & employment generation were some of the key areas identified.
It’s not just the surge of bank NPAs (non-performing assets) that is
scandalous. Imperfections prevailed on the market side too, where the private sector
tends to raise much of its debt in the private-placement window and lack of progress
in developing a vibrant corporate bond market.
All of these make it imperative for India to overhaul its financial system. A few
developments that India needs to track and absorb in its internal dynamics while
planning for the future could include: rising inequalities in income and earnings
globally; rise of global value chains and the prospects for surge in corporate
economic power, declining productivity and stagnation in labour wages; rising
indebtedness at the corporate and individual levels; decelerating trends in global
economic growth, competing for a dominant share in the shift of global economic
power; emergence of newer endeavours of economic cooperation (such as Belt and
5
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
Road Initiative); restrictions in labour mobility; and growing tensions and disputes in
world trade.
MUDRA bad loans rise in FY19, even as NPAs decline across banking system
MUDRA NPAs work out to 5.28 per cent of the total disbursements of Rs
311,811 crore as of March 2019, when compared to 3.96 per cent of total
disbursements of Rs 246,437 crore in the previous year, as per MUDRA’s figures.
However, bad loans under the MUDRA scheme are much lower than the total
system-wide NPAs. Bankers blamed a host of reasons from demonetisation to loan
waivers for the rise in MUDRA NPAs
MUDRA loans are given by commercial banks, rural reserve banks, small
finance banks, cooperative banks, microfinance institutions and NBFCs to the non-
corporate, non-farm small and micro enterprises. These loans are refinanced by
MUDRA, with allocation from the Centre.
Under the aegis of the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY), MUDRA has
created three products, namely Shishu, Kishor and Tarun. Under Shishu scheme,
loans up to Rs 50,000 are offered. Under Kishor scheme, loans above Rs 50,000 and
up to 5 lakh are given to borrowers. Tarun .scheme covers loans above Rs 5 lakh
and up to Rs 10 lakh
Capital markets regulator Sebi is right to move the Supreme Court to seek
clarity over who gets to deal with fraudulent deposit cases following its reported turf
war with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The SC must clear the air to
end the dispute. Sebi, without a doubt, has the powers to clamp down on Ponzi
schemes where gullible investors are tapped by unscrupulous operators.
6
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
In the specific case, Sebi had passed an order to attach the assets of a New
Delhi-based company and the promoters who allegedly raised cash from scores of
individuals through a scheme but defaulted on repayment. Reportedly, facing delay in
recovery, investors moved the NCLT that admitted their petition. Holding that the
insolvency and bankruptcy law overrides the Sebi Act, it asked Sebi to hand over the
assets to an insolvency professional. This merits a review. The need is to also ensure
that Sebi does a professional and speedy job of investigation. This will prevent
depositors from moving insolvency courts for redressal of their problem.
States set to lose Rs 45,000 crore share in corporate tax as Centre leans on
surcharges, cess
State governments are set to lose Rs 45,000 crore in their share in the
corporate tax to be collected by the Union government in 2019-20. Successive
central governments have leaned on surcharges and cesses to shore up their
revenues. However, this
practice is unfair to state
governments as surcharges
and cesses are not
considered part of the
divisible pool and
consequently not shared
with the state governments
as per the formula devised
by the finance commission.
The 14th finance commission headed by former RBI governor YV Reddy had
increased the share of states in the divisible pool from 32% to 42%. Its
recommendations are applicable for a period of five years from 2014-15 to 2019-20.
Basic calculations suggest that according to this formula, states would lose over Rs
7
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
45,000 crore in the current fiscal on account of their share in corporate tax alone as
nearly 15% of the Union government’s projected corporate tax earning in this year
will be through surcharges and cesses to be paid by the companies on their
corporate tax liability.
Supreme Court order opens way for naming more wilful corporate defaulters
Banks are looking to intensify the drive to name and shame more wilful
corporate defaulters.This has come after the Supreme Court last month said a person
had no right to be represented by a lawyer in in-house proceedings initiated by banks
or financial institutions to declare him or her a wilful defaulter. In September 2016, the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said some lending institutions were indiscriminately
publishing the photographs of defaulters/guarantors in newspapers. It said a lending
institution could consider publishing the photographs of only the borrowers declared
wilful defaulters, following the mechanism set out in the RBI instructions of July 2015.
Recently, Kolkata-based public sector lender UCO Bank published the name
of Yashovardhan Birla, along with his photograph, in newspapers as a wilful defaulter
because of his firm Birla Surya failing to repay Rs 67.65 crore.
8
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
Indiabulls Housing-Lakshmi Vilas Bank merger gets CCI approval
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Friday lifted the ban imposed on fund transactions
by the Manipur government due to an overdraft. The development comes hours after
Chief Minister N Biren Singh said that the overdraft was neutralised and restrictions
on the financial transactions by the top central bank would be lifted soon.
On Thursday, the Chief Minister had announced that the Finance Ministry agreed to
raise the open market borrowing for Manipur till Rs 795 crore. Singh had also said
that as an immediate relief to overcome the draft, which had reached Rs 315 crore on
Thursday, the state will borrow Rs 400 crore.
Nearly 50% of All NPAs Due to Loans Taken by Top 100 Borrowers
Nearly 50% – or Rs 4.5 lakh crore – of the total value of India’s non-performing
assets (NPAs) are due to loans taken out by the top 100 borrowers. The Reserve
Bank of India (RBI) said that as of December 31, 2018, loans taken by the top 100
borrowers created NPAs worth Rs 4,46,158 crore. This means that on average, each
of the top 100 borrowers is responsible for NPAs worth Rs 4,461 crore. The RBI
refused to provide details on who these top 100 borrowers are.
9
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
The central bank said that it collects information regarding debt under Section 27(2)
of the Banking Regulation (BR) Act 1949 and under Section 28 of the RBI Act, 1934.
The RBI’s response said: “As per Section 28 of the BR Act, RBI can only disclose
information collected under Section 27 (2) of the Act in such consolidated manner as
it deems fit.”
In its recent judgement, the Supreme Court had directed the RBI to furnish
details of its annual inspection reports and regarding its show-cause notices. But the
RBI has violated the Supreme Court’s directive and refused to provide this
information.
The fintech revolution has spread far and wide across the world with both
developed and developing countries taking giant strides in adoption. Among the
Asian countries, Singapore is fast emerging as the leading hub for fintech activities
with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Not one to be left behind, Chinese
banks are investing heavily in fintech and launching services to counter competition
from internet giants, such as Baidu, Alibaba Group Holding, Tencent Holding and
JD.com. Similarly, the Bank of England set up a permanent FinTech Hub last year as
a nodal authority and to help integrate fintech into the Bank’s functions. In the US,
banks are investing heavily in developing open APIs, which allow different software
applications to communicate with each other and exchange data directly, unravelling
options for value-added services linked to bank accounts.
10
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
India cannot afford a trade tiff with the US
Without doubt, the scale in the two cases (US-China and US-India) is vastly
different. China has the economic and political clout to deal with the US; but India is
certainly not in that league. While US trade deficit with China runs into a few hundred
billion dollars, with India it is minuscule at about $20 billion.
Be that as it may, India cannot afford an extended tariff war with the US as the
stakes are substantial. It is critical to recognise that a large number of merchandise
exports from India to the US are labour intensive. The Indian government is riding on
the horns of a dilemma. On the one hand it faces economic and political compulsions
at home to protect and advance domestic interests and, on the other, accommodate
the demands of the country’s largest trading partner. So as per the author
negotiations are the best options.
11
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807
maintained. UPI is primarily used for P2P payments and is slowly shifting towards
merchant transactions.
As per Raghuram Rajan it is important to enhance the quality and stability (in
PSB boards) through further streamlining appointment process, succession planning
and compensation. These aspects could be evaluated by bank boards and reviewed
by the Banks Board Bureau. The government, as a majority shareholder, should
make this happen.
But what needs to be done quickly is to vest ownership of all banks in a single
holding company, assign BBB as its board and leave it to appoint the PSB boards.
The government can continue to be a majority owner with 51% stake, and the
balance can come in as private capital that includes foreign capital. The holding
company can tap the market for funds and raise large doses of capital for infusion
into banks. This will help banks grow so they can lend more and get the wheels of
the economy moving. The compensation for senior bankers should also hinge on
performance. Large chunks of their salary must be linked to the bank’s performance
over a longer period of time, and, of course, with clawback provisions.
The creation of a holding company for banks should come as a part of the Budget
announcement.
12
For more details WhatsApp to +91 98281 45807