New 1
New 1
New 1
INTRODUCTION
In most heat exchangers, heat transfer between fluids takes place through a
separating wall or into and out of a wall in a transient manner. In many heat
exchangers, the fluids are separated by a heat transfer surface, and ideally they do not
mix or leak. Such exchangers are referred to as direct transfer type, or simply
respirators. In contrast, exchangers in which there is intermittent heat exchange
between the hot and cold fluids—via thermal energy storage and release through the
exchanger surface or matrix— are referred to as indirect transfer type, or simply
regenerators. Such exchangers usually have fluid leakage from one fluid stream to the
other, due to pressure differences and matrix rotation/valve switching. Common
examples of heat exchangers are shell-and tube exchangers, automobile radiators,
condensers, evaporators, air preheaters, and cooling towers.
If no phase change occurs in any of the fluids in the exchanger, it is sometimes
referred to as a sensible heat exchanger. There could be internal thermal energy
sources in the exchangers, such as in electric heaters and nuclear fuel elements.
Combustion and chemical reaction may take place within the exchanger, such as in
boilers, fired heaters, and fluidized-bed exchangers. Mechanical devices may be used
in some exchanges such as in scraped surface exchangers, agitated vessels, and stirred
tank reactors. Heat transfer in the separating wall of a remunerator generally takes
place by conduction. However, in a heat pipe heat exchanger, the heat pipe not only
acts as a separating wall, but also facilitates the transfer of heat by condensation,
evaporation, and conduction of the working fluid inside the heat pipe. In general, if the
fluids are immiscible, the separating wall may be eliminated, and the interface
between the fluids replaces a heat transfer surface, as in a direct-contact heat
exchanger.
2
fin and convected (and/or radiated) from the fin (through the surface area) to the
surrounding fluid, or vice versa, depending on whether the fin is being cooled or
heated. As a result, the addition of fins to the primary surface reduces the thermal
resistance on that side and thereby increases the total heat transfer from the surface for
the same temperature difference. Fins may form flow passages for the individual
fluids but do not separate the two (or more) fluids of the exchanger. These secondary
surfaces or fins may also be introduced primarily for structural strength purposes or to
provide thorough mixing of a highly viscous liquid. Not only are heat exchangers
often used in the process, power, petroleum, transportation, air-conditioning,
refrigeration, cryogenic, heat recovery, alternative fuel, and manufacturing industries,
they also serve as key components of many industrial products available in the
marketplace. These exchangers can be classified in many different ways.
To increase the heat transfer area, appendages may be intimately connected to the
primary surface to provide an extended or indirect surface. Thus, heat is conducted
through the fin and convected (and/or radiated) from the fin (through the surface area)
to the surrounding fluid, or depending on whether the fin is being cooled or heated.
As a result, the addition of fins to the primary surface reduces the thermal
resistance on that side and thereby increases the total heat transfer from the surface for
the same temperature difference. We will classify them according to transfer
processes, number of fluids, and heat transfer mechanisms.
3
1.2. CLASSIFICATION:
In an indirect-contact heat exchanger, the fluid streams remain separate and the
heat transfers continuously through an impervious dividing wall or into and out of a
wall in a transient manner. Thus, ideally, there is no direct contact between thermally
interacting fluids. This type of heat exchanger, also referred to as a surface heat
exchanger, can be further classified into direct-transfer type, storage type, and
fluidized-bed exchangers.
4
1.2.1.2. Direct-Transfer Type Exchangers
In this type, heat transfers continuously from the hot fluid to the cold fluid
Through a dividing wall. Although a simultaneous flow of two (or more) fluids is
required in the exchanger, there is no direct mixing of the two (or more) fluids because
each fluid flows in separate fluid passages. In general, there are no moving parts in
most such heat exchangers. This type of exchanger is designated as a recuperative heat
exchanger or simply as a recuperate. Some examples of direct transfer type heat
exchangers are tubular, plate-type, and extended surface exchangers.
5
1.2.2.1.Tubular Heat Exchangers
6
1.2.2.2.Shell-and-Tube Exchangers.
Cylindrical shell with the tube axis parallel to that of the shell. One fluid flows inside
the tubes, the other flows across and along the tubes. The major components of this
exchanger are tubes (or tube bundle), shell, frontend head, rear-end head, baffles, and
tube sheets, and are described briefly later in this subsection. A variety of different
internal constructions is used in shell-and-tube exchangers, depending on the desired
heat transfer and pressure drop performance and the methods employed to reduce
thermal stresses, to prevent leakages, to provide for ease of cleaning, to contain
operating pressures and temperatures, to control corrosion, to accommodate highly
asymmetric flows, and so on.
7
Fig 1.3.shell and tube heat exchanger
8
such as using the Ramachandra K. Patil (et al.) method from India and the Scott S.
Haraburda method from the United States.
However, these are based upon assumptions of estimating inside heat transfer
coefficient, predicting flow around the outside of the coil, and upon constant heat flux.
Yet, recent experimental data revealed that the empirical correlations are quite in
agreement for designing circular and square pattern HCHEs. During studies published
in 2015, several researchers found that the
boundary conditions of the outer wall of exchangers were essentially constant heat
flux conditions in power plant boilers, condensers and evaporators; while convective
heat transfer conditions were more appropriate in food, automobile and process
industries.
9
1.2.3. Based on flow:
1.2.3.1. Parallel and Counter flow
The most common arrangements for flow paths within a heat exchanger are
counter-flow and parallel flow. A counter-flow heat exchanger is one in which the
direction of the flow of one of the working fluids is opposite to the direction to the
flow of the other fluid. In a parallel flow exchanger, both fluids in the heat exchanger
flow in the same direction. The directions of fluid flow in the parallel and counter-
flow exchangers. Under comparable conditions, more heat is transferred in a counter-
flow arrangement than in a parallel flow heat exchanger. The temperature profiles of
the two heat exchangers indicate two major disadvantages in the parallel-flow design.
First, the large temperature difference at the ends causes large thermal stresses. The
opposing expansion and contraction of the construction materials due to diverse fluid
temperatures can lead to eventual material failure. Second, the temperature of the cold
fluid exiting the heat exchanger never exceeds the lowest temperature of the hot fluid.
This relationship is a distinct disadvantage if the design purpose is to raise the
temperature of the cold fluid.
The design of a parallel flow heat exchanger is advantageous when two fluids
are required to be brought to nearly the same temperature. The counter-flow heat
exchanger has three significant advantages over the parallel flow design. First, the
more uniform temperature difference between the two fluids minimizes the thermal
stresses throughout the exchanger. Second, the outlet temperature of the cold fluid can
approach the highest temperature of the hot fluid (the inlet temperature). Third, the
10
more uniform temperature difference produces a more uniform rate of heat transfer
throughout the heat exchanger.
11
1.3. HEAT TRANFER:
Heat transfer is the exchange of thermal energy between physical systems. The
rate of heat transfer is dependent on the temperatures of the systems and the properties
of the intervening medium through which the heat is transferred. The three
fundamental modes of heat transfer are conduction, convection and radiation.
Heat transfer, the flow of energy in the form of heat, is a process by which a
system changes its internal energy, hence is of vital use in applications of the First
Law of Thermodynamics. Conduction is also known as diffusion, not to be confused
with diffusion related to the mixing of constituents of a fluid.
The direction of heat transfer is from a region of high temperature to another
region of lower temperature, and is governed by the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Heat transfer changes the internal energy of the systems from which and to which the
energy is transferred. Heat transfer will occur in a direction that increases the entropy
of the collection of systems. Thermal equilibrium is reached when all involved bodies
and the surroundings reach the same temperature. Thermal expansion is the tendency
of matter to change in volume in response to a change in temperature.
1.3.1. Convection:
12
mass transfer. Bulk motion of fluid enhances heat transfer in many physical situations,
such as (for example) between a solid surface and the fluid. Convection is usually the
dominant form of heat transfer in liquids and gases. Although sometimes discussed as
a third method of heat transfer, convection is usually used to describe the combined
effects of heat conduction within the fluid (diffusion) and heat transference by bulk
fluid flow streaming. The process of transport by fluid streaming is known as
advection, but pure advection is a term that is generally associated only with mass
transport in fluids, such as advection of pebbles in a river. In the case of heat transfer
in fluids, where transport by advection in a fluid is always also accompanied by
transport via heat diffusion (also known as heat conduction) the process of heat
convection is understood to refer to the sum of heat transport by advection and
diffusion/conduction. Free, or natural, convection occurs when bulk fluid motions
(streams and currents) are caused by buoyancy forces that result from density
variations due to variations of temperature in the fluid.
Fig 1.6.CONVECTION
13
1.3.2. Conduction:
14
1.3.3. Radiation:
Fig 1.8.RADIATION
15
1.3.4 APPLICATIONS OF HEAT EXCHANGER
16
1.4.2 PREPARATION OF NANOFLUIDS
Nano fluids with volume concentrations of 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% were prepared
by dissolving a calculated amount of Al2O3 nanoparticles in the base fluid namely
water. With the goal of obtaining harmonized dispersion and steady suspension
throughout which regulates the final properties of Nano fluids these were undertaken
with the help of a magnetic stirrer and an ultrasonic vibrator capable of producing
ultrasonic pulses of around 100 W. Thermal properties of Al2O3–water Nano fluid By
assuming that Al2O3 nanoparticles (qp = 3600 kg m_3 and Cp = 773 J/kg K) are well
mixed within the base fluids(distilled water& ethylene glycol).
17
1.5 INTRODUCTION TO CREO
The parametric nature of CREO enhances the design intent lf a model with
tremendous ease. CREO as solid modeler powered by featured-based, associative
and parametric based. It also allows to work in a 3-d environment and calculate the
mass properties directly from the created geometry and to switch on to different
display modes like wire frame, shaded, hidden and no hidden at any time with ease
as it only changes the appearance of the model.
18
1.5.1 DRAWING
19
1.6 INTRODUCTION TO ANSYS
Today computer technology helps solving most complex problems. It is
effectively used not only for structural analysis but also for a wide range of
phenomenon such as static(structural ,creep ,fatigue ,fracture), dynamic(linear and
non-linear), vibration and noise, heat transfer, fluid flow ;in addition to manufacturing
processes such as injection molding and metal forming.
As CAD/CAM/CAE technology is much advanced, ANSYS, evolved as the
most popular and complete CAE package with its highly powerful capabilities to
help us understand the real world functionality of a design
CFD software were performed for the heat transfer enhancement in Helical Coil
Type Heat Exchanger and comparison with other types of heat exchanger and factors
or parameters affecting the performance of helical coil. The specification of a constant
temperature or constant heat flux boundary condition for an actual heat exchanger
does not yield proper modelling. Hence, the heat exchanger is analyzed considering
conjugate heat transfer and temperature dependent properties of heat transport media.
An experimental setup is fabricated for the estimation of the heat transfer
characteristics. The experimental results are compared with the CFD calculation
results using the CFD package FLUENT. Based on the experimental results a
correlation is developed to calculate the inner heat transfer coefficient of the helical
coil. The mathematical model is developed to analyze the data obtained from CFD and
experimental results to account for the effects of different functional dependent
variables such as gap between the concentric coil, tube diameter and coil diameter
which affects the heat transfer.
20
Optimization is done using Numerical Technique and it is found that the new
correlation for heat transfer coefficient developed in this investigation provides an
accurate fit to the experimental results within an error band of 3–4%.
21
Fig 1.11 example for CFD
22
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
where they presented a review about the enhancement of heat transfer by using
Nano fluids .they concluded that Heat transfer rate is directly proportional to the
Reynolds number and peclet number of Nano fluid. Increasing volume Concentration
of nanoparticles increases the pressure drop of Nano fluids.
23
The fine grade of Nanoparticles increases the heat transfer rate but it’s having
poor stability. Increasing size of nanoparticles (diameter of NP) led to decreasing in
heat transfer because area per unit volume decreases.
24
Due to the turbulence created and swirl flow generated, the convective heat
transfer obtained from the tube with twisted wire brush inserts is higher than that with
the plain tube without twisted wire brush inserts.
He was found that the concept of helical coils and their enhanced heat transfer
characteristics have better heat and mass transfer than straight tubes. In most of the
literature, a CFD modeling is used to investigate the heat transfer through helical
tubes. In this work, the optimization of helical coil heat exchanger takes place. We
have taken only one variable or parameter to optimize the helical coil heat exchanger
i.e. helical coil pitch.Entail setup cost may approximately 45 Lakh Indian rupees. Due
to this reason, we cannot fabricate this setup but instead of this, we simulate the
25
experiment with CFD software. In this experiment, the helical coil heat exchanger has
a constant coil pitch i.e. 30 mm coil pitch. Due to high cost, we can’t modify this
experimental setup but instead of this, we use the CFD simulation and change only
one parameter i.e. coil pitch of 20 mm. We can easily simulate the parameters of
helical coil heat exchanger in CFD software without any modification in experimental
setup. Although the application of CFD in the thermal based industries and power
plants will benefit the understanding of the dynamics and physics of a thermal
analysis operation and thus aid in the optimization and design of existing equipment,
constraints are the requirement for faster, easier and less expensive CFD techniques.
In CFD software development will turn automatic design and optimization in realities
and the development of web based CFD will allow more people to access the
technology. All these developments will contribute CFD to becoming a mature
discipline and a powerful engineering tool. As a result, more widespread and rapid
adoption of the use of CFD in the thermal engineering will take place in future.
26
the thermal conductivity. An average reduction of 10% to 15% were registered as the
EG concentration increases from 40% to 60%. It also observed similar pattern of
thermal conductivity of 0.1% Al2O3 dispersed in base fluids.
27
CHAPTER 3
PARAMETERS OF MATERIAL
Length 1000mm
No of coil 20
28
TABLE-3.2: MATERIAL SELECTION:
S.NO NAME OF THE COMPONENT MATERIAL USED
29
TABLE-3.4: PROPERTIES OF SILICON OXIDE (SIO2):
PROPERTIES SI/METRIC UNIT
Thermal conductivity 0.42 W/mk
30
CHAPTER 4
RESULT AND DISCUSION
The typical modeling process is performed by the creo. We are using the design
modeler workbench for modeling of any geometry in ANSYS 15.0.There are two
different parts in the assembly of helical heat exchanger in which one is cylindrical
wall with inlet and outlet opening for cold fluid and other one consists of helical steel
coil in which cold fluid flows.
31
4.2 MESHING OF DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER:
Meshing is the initial step in doing analysis for any geomentry after doing the
meshing analysis is done in ansys CFD. The mesh defines the model for analysis.
Simulation CFD automatic mesher chooses element sizes based on local curvature and
edge length for all values. Here fig 4.2 shows the meshing in this heat exchanger.
32
4.3 VELOCITY IN THE DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER:
33
4.4 PRESSURE IN THE WATER DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER:
34
4.4 TEMPERATURE IN THE WATER DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER:
35
4.6 PRESSURE IN WATER-SIO2 DOUBLE PIPE HEAT EXCHANGER:
36
4.7 TEMPERATURE IN IN WATER-SIO2 DOUBLE PIPE HEAT
EXCHANGE:
37
4.8 CALCULATION:
The temperature distributions of hot and cold fluid and the tank for constant
mass flow rates are recorded in the first experiment with flow rate and the inlet
temperature of the hot water was kept 70-75 °C and the atmospheric temperature is
320C.
=336 k
area of helical pipe (a):
π
a = ∗ d2
4
π
= ∗ (0.04)2
4
=0.00125 m2
inner size of helical pipe ( A ):
A = πdLρ
= π ∗ 0.04 ∗ 3.5 ∗ 8.96
= 3.940 m2
38
mass flow rate ( m ):
m=a∗v∗ρ
= 0.00125 ∗ 1.007 ∗ 8.96
= 0.112 kg/s
heat transfer rate ( Q ):
Q = m ∗ cP ∗ ∆T
= 0.0112 ∗ 2.008 ∗ 33
= 0.742 Kw
Q
hi =
A∗(Taverage of wall −Tmean )
1.223
=
3.940∗(340−336)
=0.047 Kw/m2k
=326.5 k
39
area of helical pipe (a):
π
a = ∗ d2
4
π
= ∗ (0.04)2
4
=0.00125 m2
inner size of helical pipe ( A ):
A = πdLρ
= π ∗ 0.04 ∗ 3.5 ∗ 8.96
= 3.940 m2
mass flow rate ( m ):
m=a∗v∗ρ
= 0.00125 ∗ 1.007 ∗ 8.96
= 0.112 kg/s
Q
hi =
A∗(Taverage of wall −Tmean )
1.223
=
3.940∗(350−326)
=0.84 Kw/m2k
40
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
From the literature review, it was found that the concept of helical coils and
their enhanced heat transfer characteristics have better heat and mass transfer than
straight tubes. In most of the literature, a CFD modeling is used to investigate the heat
transfer through helical tubes.
In this work, the optimization of helical coil heat exchanger takes place. We
have taken only one variable or parameter to optimize the helical coil heat exchanger
i.e. helical coil with nanofluid. Due to the high cost for fabricating heat exchanger
setup , we simulate the experiment with CFD software. In this experiment, the helical
coil heat exchanger has a constant coil pitch i.e. 30 mm coil pitch. We found that the
heat transfer rate is higher in water with nano fluid than water alone.
Although the application of CFD in the thermal based industries and power
plants will benefit the understanding of the dynamics and physics of a thermal
analysis operation and thus aid in the optimization and design of existing equipment,
constraints are the requirement for faster, easier and less expensive CFD techniques.
In CFD software development will turn automatic design and optimization in realities
and the development of web based CFD will allow more people to access the
technology. All these developments will contribute CFD to becoming a mature
discipline and a powerful engineering tool. As a result, more widespread and rapid
adoption of the use of CFD in future.
41
CHAPTER 6
REFERENCE
5. Kharad B.N.,. Bhagat G.P, April 2014 , ―Heat Transfer Enhancement Using Nano
Fluids- An Overview”, Volume 3, Special Issue 4
6. Yulong Ding, Liang Wang, “Heat Transfer Intensification Using Nanofluids” 41, 55–
67.
42
8. J.S. Jayakumar, S.M. Mahajani, J.C. Mandal, P.K. Vijayan, and Rohidas Bhoi, 2008,
Experimental and CFD estimation of heat transfer in helically coiled heat exchangers ,
Chemical Engg Research and Design, 221-232.
9. Rajput R.K., 2011, Heat and Mass Transfer, S. Chand & Company ltd., pp.563,
chap.10
10.Rahul Kharat, Nitin Bhardwaj, R.S. Jha, 2009, Development of heat transfer
coefficient correlation for concentric helical coil heat exchanger, International Journal
of Thermal Sciences, 48, 2300–2308
11.Rennie, T.J. and Raghavan, V.G.S., 2006, Numerical studies of a doublepipe helical
heat exchanger. Appl Thermal Eng, 26, 1266–1273.
12.Timothy John Rennie, 2004, Numerical And Experimental Studies of a Double pipe
Helical Heat Exchanger, Dept. of Bio-resource Engg. McGill University, Montreal.
13.Vimal Kumar, Supreet Saini, Manish Sharma, K.D.P. Nigam, 2006, Pressure drop and
heat transfer study in tube-in-tube helical heat exchanger , Chemical Engineering
Science, 61, 4403 – 4416.
43