Position and Competency Profile: Rpms Tool For Teacher I-Iii (Proficient Teachers)
Position and Competency Profile: Rpms Tool For Teacher I-Iii (Proficient Teachers)
Position and Competency Profile: Rpms Tool For Teacher I-Iii (Proficient Teachers)
(Proficient Teachers)
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary/Early Childhood
Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18 units in Education
Experience None Required
Eligibility RA 1080
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
Page 1 of 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: RONALD F. CUEVAS Name of Rater: EVELYN C. SALIENTE
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
District/School: HINGATUNGAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA Very Satisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Timeliness
2. Used a range of Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies that
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, was shown
enhance learner writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
achievement in Quality numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills 5
literacy and as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
numeracy skills. 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
7 6 5 4
May 2018
to April 7.5% Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No 5 0.375
2019 least 4 learner- least 3 learner- least 2 learner- learner-centered acceptable
centered lessons centered lessons centered lessons lesson as evidence
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV evidently shown was shown
1 and supported 1 and supported 1 and supported in any 1 of the
Efficiency
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the given MOV 5
other MOV given other MOV given other MOV given
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
strategies to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
thinkling, as well Quality other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as 5
as other higher- shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills.
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons as least 3 lessons as least 2 lessons as lesson as acceptable
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 of the given was shown
Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV 5
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
classroom management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
AND DIVERSITY structure to
engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
engage learners, in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks
OF LEARNERS individually or in Quality 5
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
groups, in 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
meaningful 7 6 5 4
explanation, May 2018
discovery and to April 7.5% 5 0.375
hands-on activities 2019 Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
within a range of least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson supported acceptable
supported by supported by supported by by any of the evidence
physical learning
environments. Efficiency MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 acceptable MOV was shown 5
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: RONALD F. CUEVAS Name of Rater: EVELYN C. SALIENTE
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
District/School: HINGATUNGAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA Very Satisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Page 1 of 4
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of evidence
AND DIVERSITY constructively by
learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior was shown
applying positive that promote that promote that promote that promote
OF LEARNERS and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
discipline to violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
ensure learning-
Quality
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV 5
focused submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
environments. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No
least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the of the given acceptable
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as evidence
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only was shown
Efficiency least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND PLANNING developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
implemented
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced was shown
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced learning process learning process learning process learning process
teaching and Quality as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV 5
learning 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
processes to meet 7 6 5 4
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
May 2018 least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
to April 7.5% developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence 5 0.375
2019 sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown
teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of
shown in MOV 1 and supported by and supported by the given MOV
Efficiency
and supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other 5
any 1 of the other given MOV given MOV
given MOV
3. 7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning
processes to meet
INDIVIDUAL
curriculum PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
requirements and
Name of Employee: varied teaching
RONALD F. CUEVAS Name of Rater: EVELYN C. SALIENTE
contexts.
Position: Teacher I May 2018 Position: Principal I
District/School: HINGATUNGAN NATIONAL to April 7.5% SCHOOL
HIGH Date of Review: October 2018 5 0.375
2019
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA Very Satisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Timeliness
Page 2 of 4
3. CURRICULUM 8. Participated in Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
AND PLANNING LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence
discussions that
meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to was shown
use teacher and discuss discuss discuss discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
practice.
Quality
enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction
5
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 No
least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ acceptable
FGDs/meetings meetings as meetings as meeting as evidence
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
Efficiency the given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
4.
Name of Employee: 10. Designed, F. CUEVAS
RONALD Name of Rater: EVELYN C. SALIENTE
selected,
Position: organized
Teacher I and Position: Principal I
used diagnostic,
District/School: HINGATUNGAN
formative and NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: summative
May 2018 to April 2019
assessment
strategies
consistent with TO BE FILLED OUT
curriculum TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
requirements.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
May 2018 WEIGHT ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
7.5%
to April PER KRA Very Satisfactory RESULTS 5
SCORE
0.375
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
2019
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool acceptable
assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools as evidently evidence
as evidently as evidently as evidently shown in any of was shown
shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of the acceptable
Efficiency the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable MOV 5
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Page 3 of 4
4. ASSESSMENT 11. Monitored and Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No
evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable
AND evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evidence
REPORTING progress and
progress and progress and progress and and achievement was shown
achievement achievement achievement achievement using learner
using learner
attainment data.
Quality using learner
attainment data
using learner
attainment data
using learner
attainment data
attainment data
as shown in MOV
5
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable evidence 5
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No
related performed performed performed various related acceptable
various related various related various related works/activities evidence
works/activities
works/activities works/activities works/activities that contribute to was shown
that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to the teaching-
the teaching-
learning process
Quality the teaching-
learning process
the teaching-
learning process
the teaching-
learning process
learning process
as shown in the
5
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
May 2018 MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
to April 10% 5 0.500
2019
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
least 4 different different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable acceptable
Efficiency kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV evidence 5
acceptable MOV was shown
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: RONALD F. CUEVAS Name of Rater: EVELYN C. SALIENTE
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
District/School: HINGATUNGAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA Very Satisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
QET Outstanding (5)
(4)
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Approving Authority:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES
(MOV) QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. CONTENT 1. Applied knowledge of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No
content within and and/or inter-observer agreement form about of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its acceptable
KNOWLEDGE integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within evidence
AND PEDAGOGY across curricuoum knowledge of content within and across subject
across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas and across subject was shown
teaching areas. areas as shown in MOV1 as shown in MOV1 as shown in MOV1 areas as shown in
Quality
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV1 with a rating
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed of 4
highlighting integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 the No
content and its integration in other subject areas leassons using MOV leassons using MOV leassons using MOV given MOV acceptable
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by evidence
any 1of the other any 1of the other any 1of the other was shown
Efficiency given MOV given MOV given MOV
4. Performance tasks/test materials highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
teaching strategies and/or inter-observer agreement form about different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
that enhance learner teaching strategies that enhance learner
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, was shown
achievement in achievement in literacy and numeracy skills writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
skills. Quality shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
highlighting learner-centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials highlighting learner- Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 learner- No
centered strategies that promote literacy and/or learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered centered lesson as acceptable
lessons as shown in lessons as shown in lessons as shown in evidently shown in evidence
numeracy skills
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given was shown
Efficiency supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
teaching given given given
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching strategies to and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable
that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence
develop critical and teaching strategies to develop critical and
and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative was shown
creative thinkling, as creative thinking, as well as other higher-order and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS thinking and/or other
well as other higher- thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 HOTS as shown in
order thinking skills. Quality with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching of 4
highlighting learner-centered strategies that
develop critical and creative thinking, and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials highlighting different Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 lesson No
teaching strategies that develop critical and lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by acceptable
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 any 1 of the given evidence
creative thinking, and/or other HOTS
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV was shown
Efficiency any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
given MOV given MOV given MOV
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed classroom 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
structure to engage and/or inter-observer agreement form about management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
AND DIVERSITY learners, individually managing classroom structure that engages
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in was shown
or in groups, in learners in various activities activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
OF LEARNERS meaningful Quality shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
explanation, discovery 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting various a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
and hands-on classroom management strategies that engage
activities within a learners in activities/tasks in different physical
range of physical learning environments
learning
environments. 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No
lessons supported supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of acceptable
by MOV 1 and any 1 and any 1 of the and any 1 of the the acceptable MOV evidence
Efficiency of the other other acceptable other acceptable was shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES
(MOV) QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner evidence
AND DIVERSITY constructively by teacher management of learner behavior using
behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that was shown
applying positive and the following strategies: promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and promote positive
OF LEARNERS non-violent discipline non-violent discipline non-violent discipline non-violent discipline and non-violent
1. Providing motivation Quality
to ensure learning- as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV discipline as shown
focused submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a in MOV submitted
environments. 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
4. Ensuring learner's active participation Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies acceptable
5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only evidence
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson was shown
Efficiency 4 lessons lessons lessons
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
6. Used differentiated, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied No
developmentally and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies differentiated acceptable
to address learner to address learner to address learner teaching strategies evidence
appropriate learning using differentiated, developmentally
diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in to address learner shown
experiencce to appropriate learning experiences Quality MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating diversity as shown
address learner's of 7 of 6 of 5 in MOV 1 with a
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed rating of 4
strengths, interests highlighting differentiation in content, product,
and experiences. process, learning environment or others
according to learners' gender, needs, strengths, Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 No
interests and experiences differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in evidence
3. Instructional materials highlighting differentiation in at least 2 leassons in at least 2 lessons in at least 2 lessons only 1 lesson as shown
in content, product, process, learning as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the No
environment or others according to learners' Efficiency supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV acceptable
gender, needs, strengths, interests and of the other of the other of the other evidence
experiences acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV was shown
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, managed 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
and implemented and/or inter-observer agreement form about implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND PLANNING developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
developmentally using developmentally sequenced teaching and
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching was shown
sequenced teaching learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning
and learning Quality as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in
processes to meet 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
curriculumrequirement highlighting developmetally sequenced of 4
s and varied teaching instruction that meet curriculum goals and varied
contents. teaching contexts
Timeliness
3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 No
least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ meeting acceptable
FGDs/meetings as meetings as meetings as as evidently shown evidence
Efficiency evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in any 1 of the given was shown
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given MOV
MOV MOV MOV
8. Participated in
collegial discussions
that use teacher and
learner feedback to
enrich teaching
practice.
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES
(MOV) QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 9. Selected, developed, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Developed and used 6Developed and 6Developed and 6Developed and No
organized, and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about varied teaching and used varied teaching used varied teaching used varied acceptable
AND PLANNING learning resources and learning and learning teaching and evidence
appropriate teaching using appropriate teaching and learning
including ICT, to resources including resources including learning resources was shown
and learning resources, including ICT address learning ICT, to address ICT, to address including ICT, to
resources, including Quality goals as shown in learning goals as learning goals as address learning
ICT, to address Examples: Activity sheets/tasks sheets/work MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with goals as shown in
learning goals. sheets, powerpoint presentations, video clips, of 7 a rating of 8 a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
module, SIMs-Strategic Intervention Matertials, of 4
Other
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with apprropriate Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No
instructional materials appended varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource evidence
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as was shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Efficiency MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
4. ASSESMENT AND 10. Designed, selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No
organized and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used acceptable
REPORTING diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, evidence
diagnostic, formative using diagnostic, formative and summative
and summative and summative and summative formative and was shown
and summative assessment startegies assessment assessment assessment summative
assessment strategies strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent assessment
consistent with 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum strategies
highlighting appropriate use of formative Quality
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as consistent with
requirements. assessment strategies shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 requirements as
3. Develop diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed shown in MOV 1
by superior; (b) with sample accomplished with a rating of 4
questionaire/answer sheets
4. Develop summative tests: (a) with TOS Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as acceptable
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence
accomplished questionaire/answer sheets
shown in any 1 of any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the was shown
Efficiency the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
5. Develop performance tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of learner's written work with Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored No
evaluated learner summary of results and with signature of monitored and and evaluated monitored and and evaluated acceptable
evaluated learner learner progress and evaluated learner learner progress evidence
progress and parents
progress and achievement using progress and and achievement was shown
achievement using achievement using learner attainment achievement using using learner
learner attainment Quality
2. Formative/summative assessment tools with learner attainment data as shown in learner attainment attainment data as
data. data as shown in MOV submitted data as shown in shown in MOV
TOS and frequency of errors with identified least
MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
mastered skills
12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No
promptly and clearly the same 3 learners innthe same learning area prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear acceptable
communication of communication of communication of communication of evidence
the learner's needs, with parents' or guardians' signature and date of
the learner's needs, the learner's needs, the learner's needs, the learner's needs, was shown
progress and receipt progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement to key 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher
achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
stakeholders, conferences in all quarters with proof of Quality stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ parents'/guardians' attendance including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown
3. Report cards with parent's or guardian's in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
signature in all quarters supported by minutes of submitted submitted submitted submitted
meeting
4. Communication with parents/guardians using Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No
various modalities combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV evidence
acceptable MOV was shown
12. Communicated
promptly and clearly
the learner's needs,
progress and
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Submitted a Very Satisfactory
Submitted a Satisfactory
Submitted a Unsatisfactory
Submitted Poor
any 1 of No
combination of(5)
at combination of(4)
3 of combination(3)
of 2 of the given MOV(2) (1)
acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV evidence
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter acceptable MOV was shown
6. Other documents showing learner needs, Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
progress and achievement submitted to other were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in acceptable
Timeliness across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter evidence
stakeholders
was shown
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No
related performed various performed various performed various various related acceptable
works/activities that 2. Certificate of Training related related related works/activities that evidence
works/activities that works/activities that works/activities that contribute to the was shown
contribute to the 3. Certificate of Speakership contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching-learning
teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning process as shown in
process 4. Committee involvement Quality
process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in the MOV submitted
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
6. Book or Journal Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable MOV acceptable
8. Coaching and mentoring learners in Efficiency acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence
competitions was shown
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
4. ASSESMENT AND 10. Designed, selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
REPORTING organized and used sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
diagnostic, formative about using diagnostic, formative and
and summative summative assessment startegies
assessment strategies
consistent with 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs
curriculum highlighting appropriate use of formative
requirements. assessment strategies
4. ASSESMENT AND 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of learner's written work with
REPORTING evaluated learner summary of results and with signature of
progress and parents
achievement using
learner attainment
2. Formative/summative assessment tools
data.
with TOS and frequency of errors with
identified least mastered skills
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
related
works/activities that
contribute to the
teaching-learning
process
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5 3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
4
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. 5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organizational goals and objectives.
3 Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good
grooming and communication. 4 3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies based on DepEd strategies and
1
directions.
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improves systems and 5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further
help others improve their effectiveness. enhance service delivery.
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
5 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization. 5
or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may to succeed with minimal resources.
include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer
satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY 4.00
RATINGS
rfcuevas2019
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A. Functional Competencies
Feedback:
MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV TARGET
PER KRA RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
SIGNATURE
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN (Rater/Ratee)
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1□ 2□ 3□ 4□
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation.
Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas
OTHER COMMENTS:
Note: For schools with only one observer (i.e., Principal), this form serve as the final rating sheet.
Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2□ 3□ 4□
OTHER COMMENTS:
Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3
RONALD F. CUEVAS
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2□ 3□ 4□
OBSERVATION: 1□ 2□ 3□ 4□
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: