11/5/2019 STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF TAXING STATUTES – LLB Notes

LLB Notes
LLB Notes LLM Notes LLB Past Paper

STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF
TAXING STATUTES

INTRODUCTION

Statutes imposing taxes or monetary burdens are to strictly construed. The logic
behind this principle is that imposition of taxes is also a kind of imposition of
penalty which can only be imposed if the language of the statute unequivocally says
so. Any kind of intendment or presumption as to tax does not exist. TAX AND FEE In
case of a fee, there is a specific service rendered to the fee payer. (Quid pro quo),
whereas for the tax payer no direct services are rendered but the service assumes
the form of public expenditure rendered to the public at large.

Rules of interpretation

Charging Section

The section that charges the tax must have clear words. Before taxing any individual
it must be clearly established that the person to be taxed falls within the purview of
the charging section by clear words. There is no implication of the law. If a person
cannot be brought within the four corners of the law, he is free from tax liability. In
Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Co. v Commercial Tax officer, the Supreme Court held
that in case of interpreting a taxing statute, one has to look into what is clearly
stated. There is no room for searching the intentions, presumptions or equity. In
Mathuram Agarwal v State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court held that words
cannot be added or substituted to find a meaning in a statute so as to serve the
intention
Privacy of This
& Cookies: the site
legislature. Every
uses cookies. taxing statute
By continuing must
to use this contain
website, three
you agree aspects;
to their use. subject
of tax,
To find person
out more, to behow
including taxed and the
to control ratesee
cookies, of here:
tax. Cookie Policy

Close and accept

https://lawnotes.wordpress.com/2015/05/18/strict-construction-of-taxing-statutes/ 1/4
11/5/2019 STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF TAXING STATUTES – LLB Notes

Strict and favourable construction

Taxing enactment should be strictly construed and the right to tax should be clearly
established. Equitable construction should not be taken into account. Courts should
not strain words and find unnatural meaning to fill loopholes. If the provision can
be interpreted in two ways, then the one favoring the assessee must be taken into
consideration. In Saraswati Sugar mills v Haryana State Board, The Supreme Court
held that every Act of the parliament must be read according to the strict natural
construction of its words.

Clear Intention to impose or increase tax

The intention to impose or increase tax or duty must be clear and in unambiguous
language.

Prospective operation

The cardinal principle of tax laws is that the law to be applied to assessee is the law
in force in the assessment year unless otherwise provided expressly or by necessary
implication. No retrospective effect to fiscal statute is possible unless the language of
the language of the statute is very clear and plain. In Reliance Jute Industries Ltd v
Commercial Tax officer, Fiscal Statute are generally not retrospective otherwise
expressly provide by necessary implications.

Meaning in common parlance.

In finding out the meaning of a taxing statute, the meaning in common usage,
parlance special in commercial and trade circles must be considered.

Machinery provision

Machinery provision means the procedure foe calculation and collection of tax. The
person
Privacy whoThis
& Cookies: claims an exemption
site uses has to establish
cookies. By continuing to use this it. In National
website, you agreeTag Traders
to their use. v
Commissioner
To find of Income
out more, including Tax, the
how to control Supreme
cookies, Court
see here: Cookieheld that a fiscal statute must
Policy be
construed strictly.
Close and accept

https://lawnotes.wordpress.com/2015/05/18/strict-construction-of-taxing-statutes/ 2/4
11/5/2019 STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF TAXING STATUTES – LLB Notes

No presumption as to tax

As regards to imposition of tax, no presumption exists. It cannot be drawn by

implication or analogical extensions. The presumption for equality and against
partiality of taxation exists. In Mohammed Ali Khan v Commissioner of Wealth Tax,
it was held that no tax can be imposed by inference, analogy or probing into the
intention of the legislature.

Fiscal statute to be read as a whole.

The entire provisions of a fiscal statute has to be read as a whole and not in
piecemeal to find out the intent of the legislature.

No spirit of law.

A person is no liable to tax on the spirit of law or logic or reason.

Substance of matter.

The tax authorities must consider the legal aspect of a particular transaction for levy
of tax. This is called ‘substance of the matter’.
Court fee Act If the court fee is high, then it affects the right of the aggrieved person
to seek remedy. In interpreting the court fee Act, the benefit of doubt always goes to
the assessee. Double taxation In interpreting a fiscal statute, if one meaning gives
rise to double taxation and other meaning gives rise to single taxation, then the
interpretation must be in favour of single taxation. Delayed payment of tax. Interest
is levied by tax authorities on delayed payment of tax. If provision exists, such
delayed payment is valid. Penalty- no criminal Act The penalty provision cannot be
equated with a criminal statute as a criminal act requires mens rea.
In short the general rule of construction is that in case of doubt, it is decided in
favour of the tax payer even if such a decision is detrimental to the government.

SHARE THIS:

       
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

RELATED:
Close and accept

https://lawnotes.wordpress.com/2015/05/18/strict-construction-of-taxing-statutes/ 3/4
11/5/2019 STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF TAXING STATUTES – LLB Notes

INTERNAL AID OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF Interpretation of statutes

INTERPRETATION INTERPRETATION Basic Knowledge
INTRODUCTIONStatute Introduction The term Statutory InterpretationHow
generally means the law or the interpretation means “To give Judges Read the Statute Laws
Act of the legislature authority. meaning to”. Governmental of Parliament Role of the
The general rule of the power has been divided into CourtsRecall the courts have
interpretation is that statutes three wings namely the two main roles To resolve
In "Interpretation of statutes" In "Interpretation of statutes" In "Interpretation of statutes"

PUBLISHED BY

Papoo Parmar
I am so simple and Like to do any special in my life in short way.
View all posts by Papoo Parmar 

 May 18, 2015  Papoo Parmar  Interpretation of statutes

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Close and accept

https://lawnotes.wordpress.com/2015/05/18/strict-construction-of-taxing-statutes/ 4/4