The Aging Face: January 2016
The Aging Face: January 2016
The Aging Face: January 2016
net/publication/303512351
CITATION READS
1 1,696
2 authors, including:
Bryan C Mendelson
Centre for Facial Plastic Surgery
94 PUBLICATIONS 2,080 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Bryan C Mendelson on 28 August 2019.
1
2 SECTION VIII - T H E F A C E – S U R G I C A L T R E A T M E N T
alf a millennium has passed since Leonardo da Vin- ding retinacular fibres cross the subcutaneous tissue layer in
The scalp is the basic archetype for understanding facial by the immobile retaining ligaments and immobile areas of
anatomy, as it contains the same tissue layers and planes, fascial condensation that contain important anatomical
without the complexity of the modified areas of function structures, in addition to the deep layer of mimetic muscles
found overlying the bony cavities of the face proper.1 extending from their periosteal origin.4
The skin provides the visible surface that undergoes in- With regard to facial aging, there are several clinically
trinsic changes as well as reflecting changes to the deeper important spaces within the fourth layer; the preseptal space
soft tissue layers of the face. Even in this first tissue layer, of the lower lid, the prezygomatic space, and the premas-
specialisations occur, with thick dermis containing addi- seter space. Each of these spaces has a floor formed by tis-
tional collagen over the less mobile areas, such as the nasal sue of the fifth layer, and a roof formed by tissue of the third
tip, and thin dermis over mobile anatomical areas, the layer. Each space has boundary structures that have a vary-
thinnest being on the eyelids (Figure 61-2).1 ing propensity for the development of laxity with aging.
The subcutaneous layer of the scalp and face is the sec- These spaces will be discussed with respect to age-related
ond layer and is formed by the subcutaneous fat and the changes visible on the regions of the face that they underlie.
retinacular cutis that connects the dermis with the underly- The fifth tissue layer is the deep fascia and periosteum.
ing galea aponeurotica and SMAS respectively. In the The periosteum of the skull and facial bones is confluent
scalp, the second layer has a uniform thickness and consis- with the “masticator” fascia and with the investing layer of
tency of fixation to the overlying dermis, while in the face the deep cervical fascia of the neck. In the neck, this layer
proper, there is considerable variation.1 of fascia invests sternomastoid and trapezius, while in the
The arrangement of the retinacular cutis fibres of the face, the muscles of mastication are invested; temporalis,
face is not homogenous. It varies in accordance with the masseter, and the lateral and medial pterygoids. The masti-
anatomy of the fourth layer (discussed later). Where retain- cator fascia over temporalis is known as the “temporalis
ing ligaments are located in the fourth layer, the correspon- fascia”, and over masseter as the “masseter fascia”.
CHAPTER 61 - T H E A G I N G F A C E 3
Figure 61-2. Fascial layers of the scalp and face. 1 - Skin. 2 - Subcuta-
neous tissue. 3 - SMAS. 4. Areolar tissue. 5. Periosteum. The common-
ly utilised surgical planes are shown in relation to the tissue layers.
The investing layer of deep cervical fascia affords pro- which begin as creases related directly to the contraction of
tection to the cervical plexus (deep) and the spinal accessory underlying muscles. With more advanced aging, additional
nerve (within the fascial investiture) as they course towards signs develop, not due to local contraction of an individual
their destinations. Similarly, the masseteric fascia affords muscle, but rather due to more diffuse movement of a tis-
protection to the zygomatic, buccal, and marginal mandibu- sue mass, combined with the tethering effects of the retain-
lar branches of the facial nerve as they course anteriorly, ing ligaments.
changing plane only when they approach the retaining liga-
ments of the fourth layer. It is this protection of the facial
nerve rami in the lateral face where they lie deep to layer five
that provides for safe dissection in the fourth layer spaces.
Expression lines and Wrinkles
The signs of facial aging are derived from anatomical overlying subcutaneous tissue and dermis (layers two and
changes across the various tissue layers. Among the first one). In youth, expression lines are perpendicular to the di-
noticeable changes are the expression lines and wrinkles rection of underlying muscle contraction and are present
4 SECTION VIII - T H E F A C E – S U R G I C A L T R E A T M E N T
only temporarily, during dynamic movement. However, Crow’s feet lines are orientated perpendicular to fibres
years of repetition of such muscular contraction along with of the underlying orbicularis oculi. As a result, the lines ra-
changes in the elastic quality of the skin and subcutaneous diate out from the lateral canthal region like the spokes of a
tissue leads to a permanence of the expression lines as they wheel. Repetitive action of the vertical orbicularis oculi fi-
become ‘etched’ in layers one and two and remain visible bres in the region of the lateral orbicularis raphe contribute
in repose. to the formation of crow’s feet lines at their most lateral ex-
The most conspicuous expression lines that contribute to tent.6 Consequently, the lines have a more horizontal orien-
the aged appearance of the face are; glabella frown lines, tation as they extend laterally (Figure 61-3).
crow’s feet lines, zygomatic smile lines, and perioral wrinkles. Zygomatic smile lines are immediately inferior to the
Glabella frown lines are the result of repeated move- more horizontally orientated crow’s feet lines. They are
ment of the mimetic muscles in the glabella region. Each is orientated perpendicularly to orbicularis oculi muscle fi-
fixed where it inserts in the dermis (first layer) under the bres over the lateral extent of the prezygomatic space,1 and
medial end of the eyebrow. The mimetic muscles produc- are associated with elevation of the ‘cheek’ tissues that re-
ing these lines are; the medial head of the orbital portion of sults from a temporary skin excess due to the simultaneous
orbicularis oculi, depressor supercilii, and the corrugator contraction of zygomaticus major (Figure 61-3).
supercilii (Figure 61-3).5 Perioral wrinkles arise perpendicular to the purse
Glabella frown lines are of three types. Vertical glabellar string-like contraction of the underlying orbicularis oris in
lines are produced by the transverse head of corrugator su- the same manner as the crow’s feet lines are related to the
percilii, while the oblique glabellar skin lines may be caused other major sphincter in the face, orbicularis oculi. In con-
by the oblique head of corrugator supercilii or one, or all, of trast with the expression lines at the corner of the eyes,
the three medial eyebrow depressor muscles. Transverse those around the mouth are located along the upper and
glabella lines are the result of action by procerus.5 lower edges as the soft tissues of the lip lack the stiffness of
Figure 61-3. Periorbital wrinkles. 1 - Oblique and vertical glabellar lines. 2 - Transverse glabellar lines. 3 - Zygomatic smile lines. 4 - Crow’s
feet lines. Lateral brow ptosis is also depicted.
CHAPTER 61 - T H E A G I N G F A C E 5
the lids provided by the tarsal plates, and do not have the
lateral stability provided by the medial and lateral canthal
tendons.
In general, specific correction of dynamic wrinkles, is
by use of a neurotoxin on the muscle, whereas static lines
require a tightening of the laxity of the soft tissues. The lat-
ter is usually sufficient to also camouflage the excess effect
of dynamic muscle contraction.
Expression lines develop perpendicular to underlying
superficial muscle contraction.
In youth the expression lines are only seen during mus-
cular contraction (dynamic expression lines). With aging
the expression lines persist as wrinkles during muscular re-
laxation (static expression lines).
An increase in the amount of soft tissue laxity in an area
results in a greater amplitude of soft tissue movement on
muscle contraction, which explains the increased promi-
nence of expression lines and wrinkles with aging.
The composite structure (layers one, two, and three) The midcheek skeleton also undergoes aging changes
over the temporal region has less integrity than it does over that have only recently begun to be appreciated for their
the forehead. The skin is thin and is not strongly fixed to important clinical consequences. There is a significant loss
the underlying temporoparietal fascia by the retinacular of projection of the body of the maxilla below the orbital
cutis as is the skin over the scalp and also of the midcheek rim in contrast to the prominence of the zygomatic body
(fixed by the zygomatic ligaments) and the lower face that appears not to regress. These changes of skeletal pro-
(mandibular ligament). This may explain why there is more jection are important contributors to the laxity and descent
superficial laxity, and why at times, a superficial (subcuta- of the medial cheek soft tissue.39
neous) temporal lift produces better skin re-draping over The preseptal space of layer four is the central structure
the lower temple and crows feet area than that achieved by of the lower lid and it extends for several millimetres infe-
a deep (composite subSMAS plane) lift. rior to the orbital rim, to where the orbicularis retaining lig-
Ptosis of the skin of the temporal region, which con- ament attaches below the rim (Figures 61-8 and 61-9) and
tributes to temporal hooding, can be corrected by an isolat- the attachment of the arcus marginalis.
ed temporal lift, without necessarily requiring a brow lift. The roof of the preseptal space (composite layers one to
Temporal hooding is the result of ptosis of the ROOF three) is the “anterior lamella” of the lid. It is formed by the
and tissue layers one, two and to a varying extent, layer upward extension of the cheek SMAS investing the orbicu-
three of the anterior part of the temporal region. laris oculi pars palpebrae.
The absence of frontalis over the lateral brow con- The floor of the preseptal space (layer five, the “poste-
tributes to temporal hooding. rior lamella”) is mainly formed by the septum orbitale,
Attenuation of the periorbital septum over the lateral with the lowest part formed by the inferior orbital rim (Fig-
part of the orbit allows further ptosis. ure 61-9). The septum orbitale is anatomically divided into
The combination of ptosis of the midcheek tissue and two parts: an upper, reinforced portion, where the septum is
partial tethering by the retaining ligaments is responsible supported by the capsulopalpebral fascia, and a lower por-
for the gradual appearance of separate soft tissue segments tion, which is not reinforced by the capsulopalpebral fascia.
delineated by a series of cutaneous grooves (Figure 61-6). The lower part is prone to distension, with bulging of the
CHAPTER 61 - T H E A G I N G F A C E 7
orbital fat over the lowest part of the floor. With less sup- because the anterior lamella covering it is now thinner and
port of the lower part of the septum orbitale and possibly a the cheek below has retruded.4
small amount of resorption of the bone of the inferior or- The shape and lower limit of descent of the lower lid bags
bital rim40, there is a greater tendency for it to weaken and is defined by the ORL which is the anatomic structure re-
allow the central lid fat to bulge. One reason for the appar- sponsible for defining the palpebromalar groove.4,43 The po-
ent thickness of the Asian lower eyelid may be the large sition and shape of the lid-cheek junction changes dramati-
area of unsupported orbital septum, which in the central cally with aging as it descends into the lid-cheek segment.
part averages 3 mm longer in Asian lids than it does in Cau-
casian lids.41
Lower lid bags become prominent over the lid-cheek
segment as the septum orbitale weakens and distends,
bulging over and then below the inferior orbital rim onto
the anterior surface of the maxilla. A small amount of pro-
lapsed orbital fat on top of the projection of the rim gives
an exaggerated look, suggestive of a larger volume than is
really present. At the same time, the roof of the preseptal
space (layer three) undergoes distension and allows a slight
descent of the thicker part of the roof off the same bony
prominence. On account of the posterior angulation of the
maxilla immediately inferior to the prominence, the de-
scended part of the upper midcheek loses projection. A
thinner part of the roof is now over the bony prominence.
The magnification of these small changes, caused by the
prominence of the orbital rim leaves the displaced lid fat Figure 61-7. The effect of loss of maxillary projection over a decade
projected as well as lower and at the same time ‘‘revealed’’ of aging on the position of the soft tissues over the upper mid-cheek.
8 SECTION VIII - T H E F A C E – S U R G I C A L T R E A T M E N T
Figure 61-10. Lower lid bags. Comparison between the youthful and aged lid. The blue line indicates the location of the bony orbital rim.42
This bulging convex contour alters the shape of the lower Accentuation of the nasojugal and palpebromalar
lid, giving the appearance of a ‘‘new’’ lid-cheek junction grooves occurs at the lower borders of the lid-cheek seg-
below the bulge. It is still referred to as the lid-cheek junc- ment. These signs of aging are the product of changes that
tion even though the ‘‘new’’ lid-cheek junction contour occur mostly in Layer four, at the lower boundary of the
transition has moved off the anatomical lower lid and into preseptal space, compounded by recession of the maxilla.4,45
the territory of what had previously been the upper cheek.4 Malar mounds, also called malar bags, and double bags
Medial orbital fat bulges, in contrast to those laterally, are of the lower lid, are the visible manifestation of aging
located several millimetres above the inferomedial orbital changes in and around the malar segment. The shape of
rim, held up by the unyielding character of the arcus margin- malar mounds, triangular with the apex medially, mirrors
alis reinforced lower edge of the septum orbitale in this loca- that of the underlying prezygomatic space, being defined
tion. Because of this and the deeper location of the septum, by the same ligamentous boundaries.1,4,41-43
medial fat bulges initially forward, not inferomedially, and The prezygomatic space overlies the body and maxil-
this tends to exaggerate the depth of the nasojugal groove.44 lary process of the zygoma1, and is separated from the pre-
• Lower lid bags are the result of herniated orbital fat, and septal space of the lower lid superiorly by the ORL.
ptosis of the orbicularis oculi. The roof of the prezygomatic space (layer three) is the
• The lower boundaries of lower lid bags are defined by SMAS investing the orbicularis oculi pars orbitale, deep to
the tethering effect of the orbicularis retaining ligament. which is a thin layer of adherent fat quite distinct from the
These well-defined boundaries are the nasojugal and preperiosteal fat by its fine lobulation and distinct yellow colour.
palpebromalar grooves. This is the sub-orbicularis oculi fat (SOOF) (Figure 61-9).1,4,43
Figure 61-13. Boundaries of the prezygomatic space. Orbicularis retaining ligament - ORL. Zygomatic cutaneous ligaments - ZL.
CHAPTER 61 - T H E A G I N G F A C E 11
The floor of the prezygomatic space (layer five) overlies which also serves to elevate the lateral ala. The middle sec-
the origins of the three lip elevator muscles overlying the in- tion of the crease is deepened by the action of levator labii
ferior part of the bone. Adhering strongly to this area of bone superioris.49,50 The inferior extent of the nasolabial crease is
is the preperiosteal fat that not only covers the exposed bone, accentuated by the action of zygomaticus major.46,49,51
but it also extends inferiorly between the muscles and covers Flattening of the nasolabial fold in the setting of facial
the origins and bellies of the muscles for some distance. The nerve palsy51-53 indicates that the action of the above-men-
floor is lined by a thin transparent membrane adherent to the tioned muscles contributes not only to the nasolabial crease,
preperiosteal fat and the muscles. As a result, the floor of the but also to the shape and apparent volume of the nasolabial
prezygomatic space extends lower than expected.1,4,43 The fold. Levator labii superioris, zygomaticus minor, and zygo-
boundaries of the space are depicted in Figure 61-13. maticus major are all deep to the fold on their course from
The boundaries of malar mounds are defined by the the zygoma to the orbicularis oris. Zygomaticus major con-
tethering effect of the orbicularis retaining ligament superi- traction exaggerates the fold by pulling the nasolabial
orly - separating the mounds from the lower lid bags, and crease beneath the fold, resulting in a concertina effect.53
of the zygomatic ligaments inferiorly. The effect of SMAS traction to elevate the nasolabial
Malar mounds are the result of laxity and ptosis of the fold is to directly reposition the composite layer (layers
orbicularis oculi over the prezygomatic space. This ptosis one, two, and three) of the fold and so it reduces the con-
is largely the result of laxity of fixation above by the orbic- certina effect caused by the action of the lip elevators on
ularis retaining ligament. the crease. This dynamic further demonstrates the interplay
The nasolabial segment (Figure 61-6) is separated from between ptotic tissue and structures tethering the dermis.
the laterally-placed lid-cheek segment by the nasojugal Compounding the aging changes in the nasolabial fold
groove, and below that from the malar mounds by the mid- and crease, is the malar fat pad. Within the composite struc-
cheek furrow, a continuation of the nasojugal groove down- ture of the nasolabial segment, which in other regions of
ward and outward.4 Fullness of the nasolabial fold, the me- the face behaves as an en bloc structure with respect to pto-
dial side of the nasolabial segment, is part of a complex sis, the malar fat pad (layer two) independently descends
change developing in concert with the development of these with age on the plane superficial to the SMAS-invested
furrows.46 The nasolabial fold has an upper and lower part. mimetic muscles.47 As such, the ptosis leading to increased
The upper part is partially attached to the underlying maxil- volume and positional change of the nasolabial fold occurs
la where it overlies the origins of the levator labii superioris across two planes. Given the significant contribution by the
and levator labii superioris alaequae nasi. This attached up- malar fat pad, correction of this alone may obtain a major
per part continues to the level of the alar crease. The major degree of improvement. Dissection of the underside of lay-
part of the nasolabial fold overlies the vestibule of the oral er two (deep subcutaneous plane) off the thin SMAS here
cavity and the buccal space and is accordingly mobile. On- can be readily performed (Figure 61-2).
ly the most lateral part of this mobile segment has a direct • The nasolabial crease is defined by the dermal inser-
fixation. This is where the strong zygomatic ligaments (re- tions of the lip elevators, and these insertions have a
sponsible for the midcheek furrow), aided by the upper mas- tethering effect on the nasolabial fold.
seteric ligaments suspend it from the body of the zygoma. • The nasolabial fold and crease are accentuated with age
The lower part of the fold continues into the lower cheek be- by ptosis of tissue layers one, two and three over the
yond the oral commissure where it contributes to the full- maxilla and the vestibule of the oral cavity.
ness of the labiomandibular fold as the buccal fat pad dis- • The malar fat pad contributes substantial volume to the
tends the lower border of the buccal space with age.1,4,46 nasolabial fold.
The nasolabial fold is separated from the medially The jowl and labiomandibular fold appear with the onset
placed peri-oral region by the nasolabial crease, which, of facial aging. In this, they differ fundamentally from other
with aging, develops into the nasolabial furrow.4,46,47 facial landmarks, such as the nasolabial crease and the lid-
The subcutaneous fat (layer two) in the nasolabial fold cheek junction, the presence of which are integral to the shape
is both thicker and more mobile than the subcutaneous lay- of the youthful face, although they deepen with aging.54
er over the midcheek segments lateral to the midcheek fur- The jowl and labiomandibular fold are the result of ptosis
row.27 Because of its thickness and defined boundaries, the of the roof of the premasseter space. The mandibular ligament
subcutaneous fat of the fold appears as a distinct entity, tethers the dermis at the anteroinferior corner of the space. In
commonly referred to as the malar fat pad47, which is a mis- youth, the (weaker) masseter cutaneous ligaments at the ante-
leading term because the malar fat pad does not overlie the rior border of the space provide further fixation, but this fixa-
zygoma (malar segment) as its name suggests. It actually tion does not result in visible cutaneous tethering.
overlies the maxilla.4,43,48 The shape of the premasseter space reflects the shape of
The nasolabial crease is the result of two anatomical fac- the floor, which is based on the deep fascia investing the mas-
tors; the abrupt transition of subcutaneous thickness between seter muscle (layer five).7,54 The roof of the space is formed
the medial border of the malar fat pad and the lip, and the by the SMAS investing the platysma (layer three).1,7,28,54 The
mimetic muscle action via slips which insert into the dermis roof is lined by a membrane which reflects deeply at the
of the crease.49 At its superior extent, the crease is accentuat- boundaries of the space and lines the floor as well.54 The
ed by the action of the levator labii superioris alaeque nasi, boundaries of the space are shown in Figure 61-15.
12 SECTION VIII - T H E F A C E – S U R G I C A L T R E A T M E N T
The lower masseteric cutaneous ligaments at the anteri- The jowl and labiomandibular fold are the end result of
or boundary of the space undergo considerable attrition, re- ptosis of the composite tissue layers one, two and three
sulting in more laxity of the boundary and weakened at- over the premasseter space.
tachment of the platysma roof. The nearby mandibular lig- The labiomandibular crease results from the tethering
ament remains strong and its tethering effect becomes more effect of the fascia of depressor anguli oris on the overlying
apparent. dermis.
When significant aging changes are present, the buccal Ptosis of the buccal fat pad contributes to the volume of
fat may extend down so low as to bulge into and distend the the labiomandibular fold, and if profound, can also con-
anterior boundary of the premasseter space (where it is an- tribute to the volume of the jowl.
gled obliquely forward above the jowl extension). Buccal Traditionally, it has been regarded that a subcutaneous
fat in this area contributes to the heaviness of the labio- plane for facelifting is the safest plane on account of it be-
mandibular fold and in cases of major descent may also ing remote from the facial nerve. However, the subcuta-
contribute to fullness of the jowl.54 neous plane is vascular, compared to dissecting within the
It is the laxity of the superficial fascia (platysma) ‘avascular’ soft tissue spaces, which are also safe spaces as
where it overlies the jowl extension of the premasseter there are no facial nerve branches within.
space immediately above the mandibular ligament that Recontouring the face, rather than tightness of the skin, is
allows fullness of the labiomandibular fold to develop. the objective of modern rejuvenation surgery. In fact, con-
This laxity contrasts with the labiomandibular crease, touring requires an avoidance of the flattening effect of ex-
which defines the medial extent of the fold and results cessive skin tension. Contouring of the lower face can be
from the tethering from the line of fibrous adhesion be- achieved in either of two ways. Indirectly, by re-draping the
tween the fascia on depressor anguli oris and the overly- en bloc composite flap following subSMAS dissection (layer
ing dermis.54 3) or by direct contouring of the subcutaneous layer using lo-
14 SECTION VIII - T H E F A C E – S U R G I C A L T R E A T M E N T
cal plication sutures following superficial subcutaneous dis- 14. Campiglio GL, Candiani P. Anatomical study on the temporal
section (layer 2). fascial layers and their relationships with the facial nerve. Aes-
Understanding the anatomy along the lower border of the thetic Plast Surg 1997; 21: 69-74.
15. Davidge KM, van Furth WR, Agur A, Cusimano M. Naming the
premasseter space is important for the surgeon. When the
soft tissue layers of the temporoparietal region: unifying anatom-
roof of the premasseter space is tightened, the benefit extends ic terminology across surgical disciplines. Neurosurgery 2010;
well inferior to the lower boundary of the space and beyond 67: 120-129; discussion 9-30.
the jowl into the upper neck, on account of the absence of lig- 16. Babakurban ST, Cakmak O, Kendir S, Elhan A, Quatela VC.
amentous fixation of the entire lower boundary, i.e., between Temporal branch of the facial nerve and its relationship to fascial
the PAF posteriorly and the mandibular ligament anteriorly. layers. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12: 16-23.
This is the reason why the limited dissection MACS lift56 and 17. Coscarella E, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF, Seoane E, Zabramski JM.
SMASectomy57 procedures work well for lower face lifting. Subfascial and submuscular methods of temporal muscle dissec-
tion and their relationship to the frontal branch of the facial
The avoidance of the risk of mandibular branch injury is an nerve. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2000; 92: 877-880.
additional bonus. Below the mandible, the platysma can be 18. Ammirati M, Spallone A, Ma J, Cheatham M, Becker D. An
similarly re-draped without the need for preliminary dissec- anatomicosurgical study of the temporal branch of the facial
tion using an external plication through Layer 2 of the mobile nerve. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 1038-1043; discussion 44.
platysma to the fixed Lore’s fascia (PAF).55 19. Ridgway JM, Larrabee WF. Anatomy for blepharoplasty and
brow-lift. Facial Plast Surg 2010; 26: 177-185.
20. Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the lig-
amentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast
Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 1475-1490; discussion 91-98.
CONCLUSION
21. Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Wolfe SA. Anatomy of
An understanding of the concentric layered structure of the the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the tem-
facial soft tissues provides the basis for understanding the poral fat pad. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83: 265-271.
effects of the aging process, and for a logical comparison of 22. Salas E, Ziyal IM, Bejjani GK, Sekhar LN. Anatomy of the fron-
the various planes used in facial rejuvenation procedures. totemporal branch of the facial nerve and indications for interfas-
cial dissection. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 563-568; discussion 8-9.
23. Hing DN, Buncke HJ, Alpert BS. Use of the temporoparietal free
fascial flap in the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81:
References 534-544.
24. Trussler AP, Stephan P, Hatef D, Schaverien M, Meade R, Barton
1. Mendelson BC. Facelift anatomy. In: Aston SJ, Steinbrech FE. The frontal branch of the facial nerve across the zygomatic
Walden J, ed. Advances in aesthetic surgery; 2008. arch: anatomical relevance of the high-SMAS technique. Plast
2. Schafer E. Quain’s Anatomy. 11 ed. London: Longmans, Green Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1221-1229.
and Co.; 1915. 25. Owsley JQ, Agarwal CA. Safely navigating around the facial
3. Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of nerve in three dimensions. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35: 469-477.
eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1321-1333. 26. Psillakis JM, Rumley TO, Camargos A. Subperiosteal approach
4. Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: as an improved concept for correction of the aging face. Plast Re-
facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg constr Surg 1988; 82: 383-394.
2008; 35: 395-404; discussion 393. 27. Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system
5. Knize DM. Muscles that act on glabellar skin: a closer look. Plast (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;
Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 350-361. 58: 80-88.
6. Lemke BN, Stasior OG. The anatomy of eyebrow ptosis. Arch 28. Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the super-
Ophthalmol 1982; 100: 981-986. ficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and ag-
7. Accioli de Vasconcellos JJ, Britto JA, Henin D, Vacher C. The ing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 441-449; discussion 50-51.
fascial planes of the temple and face: an en-bloc anatomical study 29. Ghassemi A, Prescher A, Riediger D, Axer H. Anatomy of the
and a plea for consistency. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56: 623-629. SMAS revisited. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27: 258-264.
8. Krayenbuhl N, Isolan GR, Hafez A, Yasargil MG. The relation- 30. Gray H. Gray’s Anatomy. 16th ed. London: Studio Editions;
ship of the fronto-temporal branches of the facial nerve to the fas- 1994.
cias of the temporal region: a literature review applied to practi- 31. Horowitz JH, Persing JA, Nichter LS, Morgan RF, Edgerton MT.
cal anatomical dissection. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30: 8-15. Galeal-pericranial flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Anato-
9. Heinrichs HL, Kaidi AA. Subperiosteal face lift: a 200-case, 4- my and application. Am J Surg 1984; 148: 489-497.
year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 843-855. 32. Kirolles S, Haikal FA, Saadeh FA, Abul-Hassan H, el-Bakaury
10. Abul-Hassan HS, von Drasek Ascher G, Acland RD. Surgical AR. Fascial layers of the scalp. A study of 48 cadaveric dissec-
anatomy and blood supply of the fascial layers of the temporal re- tions. Surg Radiol Anat 1992; 14: 331-333.
gion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77: 17-28. 33. Ozersky D, Baek SM, Biller HF. Percutaneous identification of
11. Tolhurst DE, Carstens MH, Greco RJ, Hurwitz DJ. The surgical the temporal branch of the facial nerve. Ann Plast Surg 1980; 4:
anatomy of the scalp. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 603-612; 276-280.
discussion 13-14. 34. Tellioglu AT, Tekdemir I, Erdemli EA, Tuccar E, Ulusoy G. Tem-
12. Tremolada C, Candiani P, Signorini M, Vigano M, Donati L. The poroparietal fascia: an anatomic and histologic reinvestigation
surgical anatomy of the subcutaneous fascial system of the scalp. with new potential clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg
Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 8-14. 2000; 105: 40-45.
13. Agarwal CA, Mendenhall SD, 3rd, Foreman KB, Owsley JQ. The 35. Schmidt BL, Pogrel MA, Hakim-Faal Z. The course of the tem-
course of the frontal branch of the facial nerve in relation to fascial poral branch of the facial nerve in the periorbital region. J Oral
planes: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 532-537. Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 178-184.
CHAPTER 61 - T H E A G I N G F A C E 15
36. Micheli-Pellegrini V. Surgical anatomy and dynamics in face 47. Owsley JQ, Fiala TG. Update: lifting the malar fat pad for cor-
lifts. Facial Plast Surg 1992; 8: 1-10. rection of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;
37. Furnas DW. Landmarks for the trunk and the temporofacial divi- 100: 715-722.
sion of the facial nerve. Br J Surg 1965; 52: 694-696. 48. Yousif NJ, Mendelson BC. Anatomy of the midface. Clin Plast
38. Davison SP, Mesbahi AN, Clemens MW, Picken CA. Vascular- Surg 1995;22:227-40.
ized calvarial bone flaps and midface reconstruction. Plast Re- 49. Barton FE, Jr., Gyimesi IM. Anatomy of the nasolabial fold. Plast
constr Surg 2008; 122: 10e-18e. Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 1276-1280.
39. Pessa JE, Desvigne LD, Lambros VS, Nimerick J, Sugunan B, 50. Pessa JE, Brown F. Independent effect of various facial mimetic
Zadoo VP. Changes in ocular globe-to-orbital rim position with muscles on the nasolabial fold. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1992; 16:
age: implications for aesthetic blepharoplasty of the lower eye- 167-171.
lids. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999; 23: 337-342. 51. Yamamoto Y, Sasaki S, Sekido M, et al. Alternative approach us-
40. Shaw RB, Jr., Kahn DM. Aging of the midface bony elements: a ing the combined technique of nerve crossover and cross-nerve
three-dimensional computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr grafting for reanimation of facial palsy. Microsurgery 2003; 23:
Surg 2007; 119: 675-681; discussion 82-83. 251-256.
41. Kakizaki H, Malhotra R, Madge SN, Selva D. Lower eyelid 52. Galli SKD, Valauri F, Komisar A. Facial reanimation by cross-fa-
anatomy: an update. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63: 344-351. cial nerve grafting: report of five cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2002;
42. Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams WP, Jr. Surgical anatomy 81: 25-29.
of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral can- 53. Mendelson BC. SMAS fixation to the facial skeleton: rationale
thus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 873-884; discussion 897- and results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 1834-1842; discus-
911. sion 43-45.
43. Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP, Jr. Surgical anatomy 54. Mendelson BC, Freeman ME, Wu W, Huggins RJ. Surgical anato-
of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; my of the lower face: the premasseter space, the jowl, and the
110: 885-896; discussion 897-911. labiomandibular fold. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 185-195.
44. Mendelson BC. Herniated fat and the orbital septum of the lower 55. Labbe D, Franco RG, Nicolas J. Platysma suspension and
lid. Clin Plast Surg 1993; 20: 323-330. platysmaplasty during neck lift: anatomical study and analysis of 30
45. Mendelson BC, Hartley W, Scott M, McNab A, Granzow JW. cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 2001-2007; discussion 8-10.
Age-related changes of the orbit and midcheek and the implica- 56. Tonnard PL, Verpaele A, Gaia S. Optimising results from mini-
tions for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31: 419- mal access cranial suspension lifting (MACS-lift). Aesthetic
423. Plast Surg 2005; 29: 213-220; discussion 21.
46. Mendelson BC. Correction of the nasolabial fold: extended 57. Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar
SMAS dissection with periosteal fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg facelifts: indications and techniques. Clin Plast Surg 2008;35:
1992; 89: 822-833; discussion 34-35. 533-550, vi.