Santiago v. Garchitorena 228 SCRA 214 - GARCIA

WEEK 3 The 32 Amended Informations charge what is known as delito continuado or
#17 SANTIAGO V. GARCHITORENA “continued crime” and sometimes referred to as “continuous crime.”
G.R. No. 109266/ December 2, 1993
In the case, the original information charged petitioner with performing a single
criminal act—that of her approving the application for legalization of aliens not
qualified under the law to enjoy such privilege.
Topic: Delito continuado (continuing crime)
Petitioner: MIRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO The original information also averred that the criminal act: (i) committed by
Respondent: HON. JUSTICE petitioner was in violation of a law—Executive Order No. 324 dated April 13,
FRANCIS GARCHITORENA, SANDIGANBAYAN (First Division) and 1988, (ii) caused an undue injury to one offended party, the Government, and
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES (iii) was done on a single day, i.e., on or about October 17, 1988.
Ponente: QUIASON, J.
The 32 Amended Informations reproduced verbatim the allegation of the
original information, except that instead of the word “aliens” in the original
information each amended information states the name of the individual whose
FACTS: On May 1, 1991, petitioner was charged in Criminal Case No. 16698 of stay was legalized.
the Sandiganbayan with violation of Section 3(e) of R.A. No. 3019, as amended,
otherwise known as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, allegedly Likewise, the 32 Amended Informations aver that the offenses were committed
committed by her favoring "unqualified" aliens with the benefits of the Alien on the same period of time, i.e., on or about October 17, 1988. The strong
Legalization Program. probability even exists that the approval of the application or the legalization of
the stay of the 32 aliens was done by a single stroke of the pen, as when the
On May 24, 1991, petitioner filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition approval was embodied in the same document. Likewise, the public prosecutors
(Santiago v. Vasquez, 205 SCRA 162 [1992]), to enjoin the Sandiganbayan from manifested at the hearing the motion for a bill of particulars that the
proceeding with Criminal Case No. 16698 on the ground that said case was Government suffered a single harm or injury.
intended solely to harass her as she was then a presidential candidate. The
petition was dismissed on January 13, 1992. NOTES:
Court cited several sources regarding delito continuado.
On October 27, 1992, the Sandiganbayan (First Division), of which Presiding Cuello Calon (Spanish jurist): for delito continuado to exist, there should be a
Justice Garchitorena is a member, set the criminal case for arraignment on plurality of acts performed during a period of time; unity of penal provision
November 13, 1992. The Sandiganbayan (First Division) denied the motion to violated; and unity of criminal intent or purpose, which means that two or more
defer the arraignment. Petitioner filed a motion for a bill of particulars. violations of the same penal provisions are united in one and the same intent or
According to petitioner, unless she was furnished with the names and identities resolution leading to the perpetration of the same criminal purpose or aim.
of the aliens, she could not properly plead and prepare for trial.
Guevarra: in appearance, a delito continuado consists of several crimes but in
On March 14, 1993, the Sandiganbayan (First Division) promulgated a reality, there is only one crime in the mind of the perpetrator.
resolution, admitting the 32 Amended Informations and ordering petitioner to
post the corresponding bail bonds. Hence, the filing of the instant petition. Padilla: consisting of a series of acts arising from one criminal intent or
resolution.
ISSUE: W/N the petitioner is correctly charged with the 32 Amended
Informations?
RULING:
NO. The Court found that there was only one crime that was committed in the
case, and hence, there should only be one information to be filed against her.

Santiago v. Garchitorena 228 SCRA 214 - GARCIA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Santiago v. Garchitorena 228 SCRA 214 - GARCIA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Santiago v. Garchitorena 228 SCRA 214 - GARCIA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WEEK 3 The 32 Amended Informations charge what is known as delito continuado or

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.