Law CHP 2 Notes

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Common Law and Equity

1. Customs
These are rules of behavior which develop ion a community without being deliberately

invented There are two main types of custom: genera; customs and local customs.

(a)           General Customs

Historically these are believed to have been very important in that they were, effectively,

the basis of our common law. It is thought that following the Norman Conquest the judges

appointed by the kings to travel around the land making decisions in the King’s name based

on at least some of their decisions on the common customs.

It is accepted that general customs have long since been absorbed into legislation or case

law and are no longer a creative source of law.

(b)          Local Customs

This is the term used where a person claims that he is entitled to some local right, such as a

right of way or a right to use land in a particular way because this is what has always

happened locally. Such customs are an exception to the general law of the land and will only

operate in that particular area.

Since there were exceptions to the general common law, the judges from the earliest times,

established as series of rigorous tests of hurdles that had to be passed before they

recognized any local customs. The tests are as follows:

(i)           The customs must have existed since ‘time immemorial’.

(ii)          The custom must have been exercised peaceably, openly and as of right

(iii)         The custom must be definite as to locality, nature and scope

(iv)         The custom must be reasonable

Although customs may develop, they are not part of the law until recognized by the courts;

it is the judges who decide which customs will be recognized as enforceable at law.
2. Common Law
Even in Anglo Saxon times there were local courts which decided disputes, but it was not

until after the Norman Conquest of 1066 that a more organized system of courts emerged.

The first Norman king, William the Conqueror, set up Curia Regis and appointed his own

judges. The nobles who has a dispute were encouraged to apply to have the king or his

judges decide the matter.

As well as this central court, the judges were sent to major towns to decide any important

cases. In the time of Henry II these tours became regular and Henry divided up the country

into ‘circuits’ or areas for the judges to visit. Over a period of time it is believed that the

judges on their return to Westminster in London would discuss the laws or customs they

had used and the decisions they had made with each other. Gradually the judges selected

the best customs and these were then used by all the judges throughout the country. This

had the effect that the law became uniform or ‘common’ through the whole country and it

is from here that the phrase ‘common law’ seems to have developed.

Definition of Common Law:             It is unwritten law that developed from customs and

judicial decisions. The phrase ‘common law; is still used to distinguish laws that have been

developed by judicial decisions from the laws that have been created by statute or other

legislations. Common Law also has another meaning, in that it is used to distinguish

between rules that were developed by the common law courts and the rules of Equity which

were developed by the Lord Chancellor and the Chancery courts.

3. Equity
The word equity means ‘fairness’. The system of Equity developed because of problems in

the common law. Only certain types of case were recognized. The law was also very

technical; if there was an error in the formalities the person making the claim would lose the

case.

Another major problem was the fact that the only remedy the common law courts could

give was damages. In some cases this would not be the best method of putting matters right

between the parties.

People who could not obtain justice in the common law courts appealed directly to the king.
Most of the cases were referred to the king’s Chancellor who was both a lawyer and a

priest, and who became known as the keeper of the king’s conscience. This was because the

Chancellor based his decisions on principles of natural justice and fairness, making a

decision on what seemed ‘right’ in the particular case rather than on the strict following of

previous precedents. He was also prepared to look beyond the legal documents, which were

considered legally binding by the common law courts, and to take account of hat the parties

had intended to do.

Lord Chancellor developed new remedies which were able to compensate plaintiffs more

fully than the common law remedy of damages. The main equitable remedies are as follow:

(a)           Injunction:

An injunction is an order to one of the people involved in the case to do something or not to

do something. Where the court orders one of the parties to do something, it is called a

mandatory injunction; where the order is to refrain from doing something it is called a

prohibitory injunction.

An injunction can also be granted to protect one party’s rights while waiting for the case to

be heard. This is called interlocutory injunction.                   

Case Law: Warner Brothers v. Nelson (1937)


(b)          Specific Performance

This is an order that a contract should be carried out as agreed. It is only granted in

exceptional circumstances where the court feels the common law remedy of damages could

not adequately compensate the plaintiff. Specific performance is never granted to order

someone to carry out personal services, nor it is granted for a breach of contract where one

of the parties is a minor.

(c)           Rescission

This is another remedy in contract cases and it aims to return the parties as far as possible

to their pre-contractual position.


(d)          Rectification

Under this the court will order that, where a mistake has accidentally been made in a

document so that it is not a true version of what the parties agreed, that document should

be altered to reflect the parties’ intention.

Even in the twentieth century the courts were still developing new equitable remedies.

These were the freezing order and the search order.

Apart from the above remedies, certain rights were also initiated by Equity. Concepts such

as mortgaged and trusts are founded on the idea that one person owns the legal interest in

property but has to use that property for the benefit of another. This other person is said to

have an equitable interest in the property.

Moreover, over the period of time a series of maxims were developed which formed the

basis of the rules on which equity operated. Many of the rules on which equity is based are

expressed in a series of sayings. The most important of these maxims are as follows:

1. Equity looks to the intention and not the form (case: Berry v. Berry 1929)
2. He who comes to equity must come with clean hands (case: D&C Builders Ltd.
v. Rees 1965)
3. Delay defeats equity (case: Leaf v. International Galleries 1950)

4. Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy